In vitro efficacy of sulbactam combined with ampicillin against anaerobic bacteria

Three decades of beta-lactamase inhibitors

Since the introduction of penicillin, beta-lactam antibiotics have been the antimicrobial agents of choice. Unfortunately, the efficacy of these life-saving antibiotics is significantly threatened by bacterial beta-lactamases. beta-Lactamases are now responsible for resistance to penicillins, extended-spectrum cephalosporins, monobactams, and carbapenems. In order to overcome beta-lactamase-mediated resistance, beta-lactamase inhibitors (clavulanate, sulbactam, and tazobactam) were introduced into clinical practice. These inhibitors greatly enhance the efficacy of their partner beta-lactams (amoxicillin, ampicillin, piperacillin, and ticarcillin) in the treatment of serious Enterobacteriaceae and penicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections. However, selective pressure from excess antibiotic use accelerated the emergence of resistance to beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Furthermore, the prevalence of clinically relevant beta-lactamases from other classes that are resistant to inhibition is rapidly increasing. There is an urgent need for effective inhibitors that can restore the activity of beta-lactams. Here, we review the catalytic mechanisms of each beta-lactamase class. We then discuss approaches for circumventing beta-lactamase-mediated resistance, including properties and characteristics of mechanism-based inactivators. We next highlight the mechanisms of action and salient clinical and microbiological features of beta-lactamase inhibitors. We also emphasize their therapeutic applications. We close by focusing on novel compounds and the chemical features of these agents that may contribute to a "second generation" of inhibitors. The goal for the next 3 decades will be to design inhibitors that will be effective for more than a single class of beta-lactamases.

Ureidopenicillins and beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations

Although research and development of new penicillins have declined, penicillins continue to be essential antibiotics for the treatment and prophylaxis of infectious diseases. The most recent additions are the ureidopenicillins and beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations. This article reviews the spectrum of activity, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and clinical uses of the ureidopenicillins, and the beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination agents.

The role of beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors in the management of mixed infections

Microbiological studies show that the in vitro antimicrobial activity of sulbactam-ampicillin encompasses not only gram-positive and gram-negative aerobes, but also anaerobes. Such a broad spectrum of activity suggests its suitability as monotherapy for the empiric management of polymicrobial infections. Typical mixed infections, which are frequently life-threatening, include those occurring in the abdomen or pelvis, diabetic foot infections, and brain abscess. Numerous comparative clinical studies have revealed the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of sulbactam-ampicillin to be comparable to that of imipenem cilastatin and the second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin and cefotetan. In addition, other studies have demonstrated that sulbactam-ampicillin monotherapy is cost-beneficial. A reduction in the duration of hospitalization, the lack of potentially toxic side-effects, and lower drug costs associated with monotherapy all contribute to the cost-effectiveness of sulbactam-ampicillin.

The penicillins

The penicillin family of antibiotics remains an important part of our antimicrobial armamentarium. In general, these agents have bactericidal activity, excellent distribution throughout the body, low toxicity, and efficacy against infections caused by susceptible bacteria. The initial introduction of aqueous penicillin G for treatment of streptococcal and staphylococcal infections was an important pharmacologic landmark. The emergence of penicillinase-producing Staphylococcus aureus prompted the development of the penicillinase-resistant penicillins (for example, methicillin, oxacillin, and nafcillin), in which an acyl side chain prevented disruption of the beta-lactamase ring. Subsequently, the aminopenicillins (ampicillin, amoxicillin, and bacampicillin) were developed because of the need for gram-negative antimicrobial activity. Their spectrum initially included Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Shigella, Salmonella, Listeria, Haemophilus, and Neisseria. The search for a penicillin with additional antimicrobial activity against the Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa led to the development of the carboxypenicillins (carbenicillin and ticarcillin) and the ureidopenicillins (mezlocillin, azlocillin, and piperacillin). Finally, the combination of a beta-lactamase inhibitor (clavulanic acid, sulbactam, or tazobactam) and an aminopenicillin, ticarcillin, or piperacillin has further extended their antibacterial spectra by inhibiting certain beta-lactamases (non-group 1) of resistant bacteria. The development of an ideal penicillin that is rapidly bactericidal, nonsensitizing, nontoxic, bioavailable, and resistant to beta-lactamases and that has a high affinity for penicillin-binding proteins remains the goal.

Antibiotic selection in obstetric patients

Penicillin and ampicillin are valuable antibiotics in obstetrics because of their excellent activity against group A and group B streptococci. In addition, ampicillin is the treatment of choice for enterococcal infections, particularly urinary tract infections. Limited spectrum cephalosporins are of primary value as prophylactic agents. Ceftriaxone, an intermediate spectrum agent, is an excellent drug for treatment of infections caused by N. gonorrhoeae. Extended spectrum cephalosporins, penicillins, and carbapenems provide sufficient coverage against pathogenic organisms to be used as single agents for treatment of polymicrobial infections such as chorioamnionitis and puerperal endometritis. Alternatively, combination regimens such as clindamycin or metronidazole plus an aminoglycoside or aztreonam are also highly effective in this clinical situation. Erythromycin and azithromycin have value primarily for treatment of endocervical chlamydial infections and mycoplasma pneumonia in obstetric patients and for intrapartum prophylaxis against group B streptococcal infection in patients who are allergic to beta-lactam antibiotics.

A five-year multicenter study of the susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates to cephalosporins, cephamins, penicillins, clindamycin, and metronidazole in the United States

Over 2800 clinical strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group were collected during a 5-year period from ten geographically separate sites and tested for their susceptibility to various antimicrobial agents using a broth microdilution method. Among the cephalosporins, ceftizoxime was the most active (13% resistance) and importantly exhibited relatively equal activity against both B. fragilis species and non-B. fragilis species. Cefotaxime exhibited similar activity with an overall resistance rate of 18%. Both ceftriaxone and cefoperazone were appreciably less active cephalosporins especially against non-B. fragilis species. With regard to cephamycins, cefoxitin (MIC90, 32 micrograms/ml) was more active than cefotetan (MIC90, > or = 256 micrograms/ml) and cefmetazole (MIC90, 64 micrograms/ml). Non-B. fragilis species were highly resistant to cefotetan and cefmetazole. Imipenem was highly active against all strains with the exception of four strains of B. fragilis. Ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam, and cefoperazone-sulbactam were all highly active with resistance rates < 2%. No resistance was detected to metronidazole, whereas 14% of isolates were resistant to clindamycin. When compared with other studies, these findings underscore the wide variability in susceptibility patterns reported nationwide and the need to continue monitoring these patterns to aid in choosing the most active compounds for therapy.

Cross-resistance to beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and clindamycin among cefoxitin-resistant and cefoxitin-susceptible strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group

In the present study the cross-resistance rates of cefoxitin-resistant and cefoxitin-susceptible strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group were compared with regard to beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and clindamycin. Piperacillin-tazobactam was the most active agent tested with an overall resistance rate of 0.2% and no resistance among cefoxitin-resistant strains. Ticarcillin-clavulanate was the least active combination with an overall resistance rate of 1.6% but a resistance rate of 13.1% among cefoxitin-resistant strains. For ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and clindamycin resistance, rates of cefoxitin-resistant versus cefoxitin-susceptible strains were 9.1% and 0.4%, 8.3% and 0.9%, and 28% and 12.9%, respectively.

Penicillins. A current review of their clinical pharmacology and therapeutic use

The penicillins are a large group of bicyclic ring compounds which contain a 4-membered beta-lactam ring (penams) fused to a 5-membered thiazolidine ring. Benzylpenicillin (penicillin G) was the first natural penicillin with potent activity against all Gram-positive pathogens, Gram-negative cocci and some spirochaetes and actinomycetes. For the last 50 years benzylpenicillin has been the mainstay of therapy for serious pneumococcal, streptococcal, meningococcal and gonococcal infections. However, the past decade has seen the emergence of resistance in certain parts of the world, initially among the gonococci, and more recently among the pneumococci and meningococci. Discovery of the 6-aminopenicillinamic acid nucleus has led to considerable manipulation of the basic ring structure, resulting initially in the synthesis of ampicillin, and subsequently the other aminopenicillins, analogues, esters and prodrugs. These drugs have the advantages of improved oral bioavailability and superior activity against Haemophilus influenzae, certain Gram-negative bacilli, salmonellae, enterococci and Listeria monocytogenes, making these agents popular in the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections and urinary tract infections. The increasing spread of bacterial resistance, particularly among Enterobacteriaceae and H. influenzae, has curtailed the usefulness of these drugs in these clinical settings. To counteract this problem, a number of agents combining a penicillin and a beta-lactamase inhibitor (e.g. clavulanic acid, tazobactam and sulbactam) have been developed. These inhibitors have no intrinsic antibacterial activity, but combining them with a penicillin (e.g. amoxicillin/clavulanic acid) confers greater stability to beta-lactamases and hence a broader spectrum of activity. The emergence of penicillinase-producing staphylococci that rendered benzylpenicillin ineffective also stimulated the search for penicillinase-resistant penicillins--methicillin and nafcillin, followed by the acid-stable isoxazolyl penicillins. These agents are now the principle antistaphylococcal treatment. Methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci are currently a major cause of hospital sepsis, and are resistant to these latter agents. Enteric Gram-negative bacilli have been the predominant cause of serious hospital infections during the last 30 years. Further manipulation of the penicillin structure has resulted in compounds with broader activity against Gram-negative bacilli, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa, while retaining activity against Gram-positive pathogens. The carboxypenicillins were the first step in this direction, but have been largely superseded by the ureidopenicillins. These agents have better activity against P. aeruginosa, and are still effective against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, including enterococci and anaerobic organisms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Efficacy of a beta-lactamase inhibitor combination for serious intraabdominal infections

A double-blind trial was conducted in 385 patients with suspected bacterial intra-abdominal infections to compare the efficacy and safety of ampicillin-sulbactam with cefoxitin. Patients were randomized to receive either 3 g ampicillin-sulbactam (2 g ampicillin-1 g sulbactam), or 2 g cefoxitin, every 6 hours. To be evaluable, patients had to demonstrate positive culture evidence of peritoneal infection at the time of operation. A total of 197 patients were evaluable for clinical efficacy. The two treatment groups were comparable in demographic features and in the presence of risk factors for infection. Clinical success (absence of infection and of adverse drug reaction) was observed in 86% of patients in the ampicillin-sulbactam group and 78% in the cefoxitin group. Eradication of infection occurred in 88% of the ampicillin-sulbactam group and 79% of the cefoxitin group. There were no differences in the nature or frequency of side effects observed in the two groups. Ampicillin-sulbactam demonstrated no difference in safety or efficacy when compared with cefoxitin in the treatment of serious intra-abdominal infections of bacterial origin.

Inhibitory and bactericidal activity of selected beta-lactam agents alone and in combination with beta-lactamase inhibitors compared with that of cefoxitin and metronidazole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group

The inhibitory activity of five beta-lactam agents, alone and in combination with a beta-lactamase inhibitor, was compared with that of cefoxitin and metronidazole against 300 beta-lactamase producing Bacteroides fragilis group isolates. Each of the beta-lactamase inhibitors significantly potentiated the activity of the respective beta-lactam. In the presence of clavulanate, the MIC90 (minimum inhibitory concentration) values of amoxicillin and ticarcillin were reduced 64-fold and 32-fold, respectively. Similarly, sulbactam enhanced the activity of ampicillin and cefoperazone 16-fold and 8-fold, respectively, whereas tazobactam potentiated the activity of piperacillin 16-fold. Few strains were resistant to the beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and were comprised of strains of B. fragilis, B. thetaiotamicron, and B. distasonis. Of the strains, 7% were resistant to cefoxitin, and none to metronidazole. Using time-kill kinetic studies, the bactericidal activity of the various beta-lactam agents, with and without beta-lactamase inhibitors, was determined and compared with that of cefoxitin and metronidazole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of the B. fragilis group. Overall, metronidazole was the most bactericidal agent with all isolates being killed with less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml at 24 hr. Ampicillin-sulbactam was the next most bactericidal agent with all isolates being killed with less than or equal to 16/8 micrograms/ml of ampicillin-sulbactam at 24 hr. Amoxicillin-clavulanate and cefoperazone-sulbactam had bactericidal activity similar to that of ampicillin-sulbactam. Piperacillin-tazobactam and ticarcillin-clavulanate were bactericidal at higher concentrations with all isolates killed with 64 micrograms/ml of piperacillin and 128 micrograms/ml of ticarcillin combined with their respective beta-lactamase inhibitors. None of the beta-lactam agents alone was able to kill more than 19 of the 26 isolates. We conclude that beta-lactam agents combined with beta-lactamase inhibitors have both inhibitory and bactericidal activity against cefoxitin-resistant members of the B. fragilis group provided that the concentrations achieved for these combinations are at the upper limits for maximum recommended dosing. Although isolates of the B. fragilis group have been reported to produce unusual beta-lactamases that are refractory to beta-lactamase inhibitors, none of the cefoxitin-resistant isolates tested in this study were resistant to the beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

The penicillins

The penicillin family of antibiotics remains an important part of our antimicrobial armamentarium. In general, these agents have bactericidal activity, excellent distribution throughout the body, low toxicity, and efficacy against infections caused by susceptible bacteria. The initial introduction of aqueous penicillin G for treatment of streptococcal and staphylococcal infections was an important pharmacologic landmark. The emergence of penicillinase-producing Staphylococcus aureus prompted the development of the penicillinase-resistant penicillins (for example, methicillin, oxacillin, and nafcillin), in which an acyl side chain prevented disruption of the beta-lactam [corrected] ring. Subsequently, the aminopenicillins (such as ampicillin and amoxicillin) were developed because of the need for gram-negative antimicrobial activity. Their spectrum included Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Shigella Salmonella, Listeria, Haemophilus, and Neisseria. The search for a penicillin with additional antimicrobial activity against the Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa led to the development of the carboxypenicillins (carbenicillin, ticarcillin, and temocillin) and the ureidopenicillins (mezlocillin, azlocillin, piperacillin, and apalcillin). Finally, the combination of a beta-lactamase inhibitor (clavulanic acid or sulbactam) and an aminopenicillin or ticarcillin has further extended their antibacterial spectra. The development of an ideal penicillin that is rapidly bactericidal, nonsensitizing, nontoxic, bioavailable, resistant to beta-lactamase, and without inoculum effect and that has a high affinity for penicillin-binding proteins remains the goal.

Effect of beta-lactamase inhibitors on the activities of various beta-lactam agents against anaerobic bacteria

The in vitro activities of several new beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (piperacillin plus tazobactam, ceftizoxime and cefonicid with sulbactam and clavulanic acid, and ampicillin plus 8 micrograms of sulbactam per ml) were tested with anaerobic bacteria and compared with known beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and other potent antianaerobe agents. All the combinations tested (except for the cefonicid-inhibitor combinations) were active against almost all strains of the Bacteroides fragilis group. This report indicates that beta-lactamase inhibitors may improve the activity of beta-lactam agents with marginal activity against the B. fragilis group.

Spiral gradient endpoint method compared to standard agar dilution for susceptibility testing of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli

More efficient and reproducible alternative methods of performing agar dilution susceptibility testing are desirable, particularly for anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobes generally grow more reliably on solid media than they do in broth microdilution wells. A new method, the revised spiral gradient endpoint (SGE) method, was evaluated against the standard agar dilution (SAD) method by using a wide variety of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli (161 strains) and eight antimicrobial agents. For the SGE method, a spiral plater was used to set up a concentration gradient of an antimicrobial agent within an agar plate across which bacterial strains were inoculated as radial streaks. After incubation, the MIC of the antimicrobial agent was calculated from the radial endpoint location where bacterial growth ceased along the streak. The MICs for 90% of strains tested (in micrograms per milliliter) and the cumulative percentages of susceptible strains at the breakpoints for the SGE and SAD methods, respectively, and for all 161 strains were as follows: for metronidazole, 2 and 100 versus 2 and 100; for imipenem, 1 and 99 versus 0.5 and 98; for ampicillin-sulbactam, 8 and 97 versus 8 and 98; for clindamycin, 4 and 90 versus 4 and 91; for cefoxitin, 32 and 95 versus 32 and 95; for mezlocillin, 256 and 88 versus greater than 128 and 86; for ampicillin, greater than or equal to 256 and 51 versus greater than 64 and 51; and for penicillin (in units per milliliter), greater than or equal to 512 and 71 versus greater than 64 and 65. The excellent agreement of these data and the greater sensitivity reproducibility, and efficiency of the revised SGE method warrant further evaluations. Assuming that these advantages are confirmed, the revised SGE method should be a useful alternative test method when detailed susceptibility data are desired.

Broth-disk elution tests to predict the susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to the ampicillin-sulbactam combination

The ampicillin-sulbactam Wilkins-Chalgren agar dilution MICs (2 ratios) were compared with the results of broth-disk elution (BDE) tests using various numbers of disks corresponding to elution breakpoints of less than or equal to 8:8 micrograms/ml, less than or equal to 16:8 micrograms/ml, and less than or equal to 16:16 micrograms/ml. This study showed that a 2:1 ratio MIC test and a 16:8 micrograms/ml BDE breakpoint were best for anaerobic organisms; a recommendation consistent with susceptibility testing criteria for rapidly growing aerobic species. The addition of four ampicillin disks (10 micrograms) and four ampicillin-sulbactam discs (10:10 micrograms) to 5 ml of thioglycolate broth was recommended. This test would achieve greater than 99% comparative accuracy to MICs determined with the reference National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards agar dilution method.

A multicentre study to evaluate the effect of sulbactam/ampicillin combination on anaerobic micro-organisms

Ampicillin combined with the beta-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam was compared with ampicillin alone, cefoxitin and metronidazole against 569 clinical strains of anaerobic organisms. The strains included 289 species of Bacteroides, 160 strains of Clostridium and 120 strains of various species of Streptococcus/Peptostreptococus, Fusobacterium, Veillonella, Eubacterium, Bifidobacterium, Actinomyces and Propionibacterium. Sulbactam/ampicillin was as effective as cefoxitin and metronidazole against all anaerobic species tested, inhibiting more than 90% of strains at the breakpoints (16, 32 and 32 mg/l, respectively). Sulbactam/ampicillin was also significantly more active than ampicillin against strains of Bacteroides, the minimal inhibitory concentration being at least four-fold lower. In contrast, the activity of the combination did not differ from that of ampicillin alone against Fusobacterium species and Gram-positive rods and cocci.

Kinetics of Antimicrobial Activity of Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid and Metronidazole against β-Lactamase-Producing Bacteroides fragilis Group

Bacteroides fragilis group are the most common anaerobic bacteria isolated in clinical specimens. The use of a beta-lactam with a β-lactamase inhibitor should result in a marked increase in the group's sensitivity to the β-lactams. Since the activity (MIC) shown by the amoxicillin + clavulanic acid combination against Bacteroides fragilis group is good, other parameters of in vitro activity have been studied. This study was also done with metronidazole. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined in 26 strains of Bacteroides fragilis group (14 B. fragilis; 5 B. thetaiotaomicron; 4 B. vulgatus; 3 B. distasonis). Likewise, the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), the killing curve, the sub-MIC and post-antibiotic effect were determined. The MIC ranged between 0.5 and 32 mg/l. The MBC was two- to four-fold the MIC for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, and one- to two-fold the MIC for metronidazole for most strains. The killing curve showed a continuous decrease, sloping most sharply between 0-2 hours and 6-8 hours. Amoxicillin + clavulanic acid showed a post-antibiotic effect between 2 and 4 hours. The inhibitory minimum antibiotic concentration was one-half the MIC for most strains.

Sulbactam/ampicillin versus metronidazole/gentamicin in the treatment of post-cesarean section endometritis

Sixty-seven patients diagnosed with post-cesarean-section endometritis were studied in a prospective comparative randomized trial of sulbactam/ampicillin, a new beta-lactamase inhibitor drug combination, versus treatment with metronidazole/gentamicin. The success rate was 91% for each antibiotic regimen. Mycoplasma spp. or Ureaplasma spp. were isolated from all treatment failures. Endometrial cultures revealed 2.3 aerobes as well as anaerobes per patient, with Enterococcus faecalis, Bacteroides bivius, and Escherichia coli the most frequently reported bacterial isolates in 64, 40, and 28% of all patients, respectively. Positive blood cultures were noted in 11 (15%) patients with Mycoplasma sp. the most commonly found isolate (45.5%). Sulbactam/ampicillin appears to be safe and equally effective as a metronidazole/aminoglycoside drug regimen in the treatment of postpartum endometritis.

Clinical pharmacology of antibiotics. Sulbactam/ampicillin

Sulbactam/ampicillin appears to be effective in the treatment of gynecologic and intra-abdominal infections, and infections of skin and skin structures. However, until more data is available from well-controlled, comparative studies, it is difficult to determine the most appropriate place of sulbactam/ampicillin in the therapy of these and other infections. Sulbactam/ampicillin is similar to other agents in the prophylaxis of infectious complications secondary to gastrointestinal and gynecologic surgery, and may have a role in surgical prophylaxis as it is well tolerated by most patients and is cost-effective. Indeed, the discovery of sulbactam provides us with yet another useful compound. Additional study is clearly needed so as to best use sulbactam to its fullest advantage.

Evaluation of in vitro methods for testing susceptibility of anaerobes to ampicillin-sulbactam and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid

A total of 97 anaerobic bacteria were tested for susceptibility to ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid by broth microdilution and disk elution methods, the results of which were compared with those of the reference agar dilution method. With the broth microdilution method, approximately 95% of MICs were within 1 dilution of those of the reference agar method, with a definite (0.6 to 0.7 dilution) trend toward lower MICs. The disk elution test performed satisfactorily, but additional anaerobic isolates resistant to ampicillin-sulbactam and/or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (currently rare) are needed to assure the predictability of resistance by the disk elution test.

In vitro activity of cefotetan compared with that of other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria

The activity of cefotetan against 430 strains of anaerobic bacteria was compared with that of cefoxitin, ceftizoxime, clindamycin, metronidazole, and chloramphenicol. Percent susceptible values for the Bacteroides fragilis group were 60, 80, 29, 86, 100, and 100%, respectively. Percent susceptible values for the B. fragilis species were 91, 92, 46, 98, 100, and 100%, respectively. Non-B. fragilis-group Bacteroides species were inhibited very well (90 to 100%) by all drugs except ceftizoxime (80%). Cefotetan and metronidazole were the most active agents against Clostridium difficile. Percent susceptible values for all strains were 72, 79, 44, 82, 93, and 98%, respectively.

In vitro activity of cefoperazone plus sulbactam compared with that of other antimicrobial agents against anaerobic bacteria

The activity of two cefoperazone-sulbactam combinations against anaerobic bacteria was tested and compared both with that of cefoperazone alone and with that of other commonly used antimicrobial agents. Imipenem was the most active of the tested agents, followed by chloramphenicol, metronidazole, and cefoperazone-sulbactam (90 to 100% of bacterial growth inhibited). Clindamycin and cefoxitin inhibited approximately 80%, cefoperazone inhibited 63%, and penicillin G inhibited 47% of the strains tested. The agents were variable in activity against the Bacteroides fragilis group, with percents susceptible as follows: cefoperazone-sulbactam, imipenem, metronidazole, and chloramphenicol, 99 to 100%; cefoxitin and clindamycin, approximately 80%; cefoperazone, 49%; and penicillin G, 15.5%.

Use of new beta-lactam antibiotics for surgical infections

The availability of beta-lactam antibiotics with extended spectra of activity against organisms commonly seen in surgical infections suggests that aminoglycoside-based therapy is no longer needed for most such community-acquired infections. The primary problems with specific beta-lactams are lack of activity against Bacteroides species and variable activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterococci. The pharmacokinetic properties of the newer beta-lactams vary considerably. This variation suggests specific settings in which these properties may be taken advantage of to improve clinical outcome.

Clinical and pathological evaluation of sulbactam/ampicillin for treatment of experimental bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis

An experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of sulbactam/ampicillin for treatment of bovine pneumonic pasteurellosis. Twenty-one Hereford calves were experimentally infected with bovine herpesvirus-1 and an ampicillin-resistant strain of Pasteurella haemolytica, then treated for three days with either sulbactam/ampicillin, chloramphenicol, or a placebo. The treatments were evaluated by comparing clinical illness scores, total sick days, weight changes, mortality rates, and postmortem lung scores between treatment groups. Both antibiotics were highly effective in reducing respiratory disease in the experimentally infected calves. The clinical response to sulbactam/ampicillin treatment was comparable with that of chloramphenicol and was significantly improved compared with the response to the placebo treatment. These findings suggest that the efficacy of sulbactam/ampicillin may be comparable to that of chloramphenicol for treatment of pneumonic pasteurellosis involving ampicillin-resistant strains of P. haemolytica.

Sulbactam/ampicillin versus cefotaxime as initial therapy in serious soft tissue, joint and bone infections

In an open, randomised comparative study, 23 patients with bone, joint or soft tissue infections were treated with ampicillin 2g plus sulbactam 1g 3 times a day or cefotaxime 2g 3 times a day as an initial 2-week therapy. Monoinfections with Staphylococcus aureus were the most common bone or joint infections. Clinical cure or improvement 2 weeks after the end of therapy was observed in all 13 patients treated with sulbactam/ampicillin and in 7 of the 8 patients evaluated for efficacy after treatment with cefotaxime. Most organisms identified before the onset of therapy were susceptible to the antibiotic randomly selected for therapy, although the majority of infections due to beta-lactamase-producing staphylococci could not have been treated with ampicillin without sulbactam. Treatment failed to eradicate S. aureus in 1 patient from each group. In addition, S. aureus infection recurred in 2 patients in the cefotaxime group within 2 weeks after the end of therapy. No serious side effects were observed.

Beta-lactamase inhibitors from laboratory to clinic

beta-Lactamases constitute the major defense mechanism of pathogenic bacteria against beta-lactam antibiotics. When the beta-lactam ring of this antibiotic class is hydrolyzed, antimicrobial activity is destroyed. Although beta-lactamases have been identified with clinical failures for over 40 years, enzymes with various abilities to hydrolyze specific penicillins or cephalosporins are appearing more frequently in clinical isolates. One approach to counteracting this resistance mechanism has been through the development of beta-lactamase inactivators. beta-Lactamase inhibitors include clavulanic acid and sulbactam, molecules with minimal antibiotic activity. However, when combined with safe and efficacious penicillins or cephalosporins, these inhibitors can serve to protect the familiar beta-lactam antibiotics from hydrolysis by penicillinases or broad-spectrum beta-lactamases. Both of these molecules eventually inactivate the target enzymes permanently. Although clavulanic acid exhibits more potent inhibitory activity than sulbactam, especially against the TEM-type broad-spectrum beta-lactamases, the spectrum of inhibitory activities are very similar. Neither of these inhibitors acts as a good inhibitor of the cephalosporinases. Clavulanic acid has been most frequently combined with amoxicillin in the orally active Augmentin and with ticarcillin in the parenteral beta-lactam combination Timentin. Sulbactam has been used primarily to protect ampicillin from enzymatic hydrolysis. Sulbactam has been used either in the orally absorbed prodrug form as sultamicillin or as the injectable combination ampicillin-sulbactam. Synergy has been demonstrated for these combinations for most members of the Enterobacteriaceae, although those organisms that produce cephalosporinases are not well inhibited. Synergy has also been observed for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Haemophilus influenzae, penicillinase-producing Staphylococcus aureus, and anaerobic organisms. These antibiotic combinations have been used clinically to treat urinary tract infections, bone and soft-tissue infections, gonorrhea, respiratory infections, and otitis media. Gastrointestinal side effects have been reported for Augmentin and sultamicillin; most side effects with these agents have been mild. Although combination therapy with beta-lactamase inactivators has been used successfully, the problem of resistance development to two agents must be considered. Induction of cephalosporinases can occur with clavulanic acid. Permeability mutants could arise, especially with added pressure from a second beta-lactam.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Optimal dilution susceptibility testing conditions, recommendations for MIC interpretation, and quality control guidelines for the ampicillin-sulbactam combination

The ampicillin-sulbactam combination was evaluated in vitro to determine the optimal susceptibility testing conditions among five combination ratios and four fixed concentrations of sulbactam. The organisms tested were markedly resistant to aminopenicillins and most other beta-lactams. The ratio of 2:1 is recommended to assure recognition of the ampicillin-sulbactam spectrum and minimize false-susceptible results among strains known to be resistant to this combination. Proposed MIC breakpoint concentrations were compatible with levels in serum achieved with recommended clinical doses. Cross-resistance analyses comparing ampicillin-sulbactam and amoxicillin-clavulanate showed comparable activity and spectra. However, the major interpretive disagreement was sufficient to require separate testing of these aminopenicillin-inhibitor combinations. The recommended ampicillin-sulbactam MIC susceptibility breakpoints are as follows: (i) less than or equal to 8.0/4.0 micrograms/ml for tests against members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, anaerobes, nonenteric gram-negative bacilli, staphylococci, Haemophilus influenzae, and Branhamella catarrhalis; (ii) the ampicillin MICs alone interpreted by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards criteria should predict ampicillin-sulbactam susceptibility for the enterococci, streptococci, and Listeria monocytogenes. MIC quality control ranges were determined by multiple laboratory broth microdilution trials for the ampicillin-sulbactam 1:1 and 2:1 ratio tests.

In vitro activity of ampicillin plus sulbactam against anaerobes compared to ampicillin and cefoxitin

The antimicrobial susceptibility of 195 recent clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria was studied to ampicillin alone, ampicillin + 1 mg/l sulbactam, ampicillin + 5 mg/l sulbactam, and cefoxitin by means of agar dilution tests. The ampicillin-sulbactam combinations were the most effective drugs against species of the Bacteroides fragilis group, the MIC90 of ampicillin + 5 mg/l sulbactam for B. fragilis being less than 1 mg/l, compared to 256 mg/l of ampicillin, 4 mg/l of ampicillin + 1 mg/l sulbactam, and 8 mg/l of cefoxitin. No significant difference between ampicillin alone and in combination with sulbactam was observed against gram-positive anaerobic rods, Peptococcus spp. and Peptostreptococcus spp. with MIC's less than 2 mg/l.

Sulbactam/ampicillin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use

Sulbactam is a semisynthetic beta-lactamase inhibitor which when combined with certain beta-lactam antibacterials extends their activity against bacteria that are normally resistant to the antibiotic due to production of beta-lactamases. In combination with ampicillin it extends the antibacterial activity of ampicillin to include beta-lactamase-producing strains which are otherwise resistant, including Bacteroides fragilis, and increases the susceptibility of many sensitive strains. Sulbactam is poorly absorbed after oral administration and sulbactam/ampicillin is therefore administered parenterally, although another linked sulbactam-ampicillin compound, sultamicillin, has been developed which is well absorbed after oral administration. The basic pharmacokinetic characteristics of sulbactam after parenteral administration are similar to those of ampicillin. Multiple-dose therapy with sulbactam/ampicillin is clinically and bacteriologically effective in infections of the urinary tract, skin and soft tissue, bones and joints, respiratory tract, ears, nose and throat, as well as intra-abdominal and obstetric and gynaecological infections and septicaemia. In addition, single intramuscular doses of sulbactam/ampicillin administered with oral probenecid are therapeutically effective in gonorrhoea, including infections due to penicillinase-producing and/or ampicillin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. In the prophylaxis of infectious complications of surgery sulbactam/ampicillin is superior to placebo and appears to be similar in efficacy to several alternative antibacterial regimens. Further studies involving larger numbers of patients are needed to clarify the comparative therapeutic and prophylactic efficacy of sulbactam/ampicillin and alternative antibacterial drugs. Nonetheless, sulbactam/ampicillin improves the therapeutic and prophylactic efficacy of an antibacterial of familiar safety, and must be seen as a worthwhile advance.

A review of the role of beta-lactamase-producing bacteria in obstetric-gynecologic infections

beta-Lactam antibiotics are the most commonly used antibiotics in obstetrics and gynecology. However, they are susceptible to inactivation when attacked by beta-lactamase, an enzyme produced by many bacterial species. During the past three decades, numerous penicillins and cephalosporins have been made with a stable beta-lactam ring that resists enzyme attack. More recently enzyme inhibitors have been discovered that inactivate beta-lactamase. The combination of an enzyme inhibitor with a beta-lactam antibiotic, such as ampicillin, restores the antimicrobial activity of the beta-lactam against formerly resistant strains of staphylococci, Haemophilus influenzae, Enterobacteriaceae, and Bacteroides fragilis.

Comparative activity of beta-lactamase inhibitors YTR 830, clavulanate, and sulbactam combined with beta-lactams against beta-lactamase-producing anaerobes

The in vitro activities of the beta-lactamase inhibitors YTR 830, clavulanate, and sulbactam combined with six beta-lactams against 88 beta-lactamase-producing anaerobes were determined. When combined with the beta-lactams, the three beta-lactamase inhibitors showed no synergy against the 10 Bacteroides fragilis homology group II strains. When the beta-lactams were combined with the inhibitors, their geometric mean MICs against the remaining 78 strains were reduced from 4.2 to 150.2 micrograms/ml to 0.2 to 12.9 micrograms/ml. The activity of the beta-lactams combined with the beta-lactamase inhibitors was significantly greater than that of the beta-lactams alone against all groups except B. fragilis homology group II, with 76 to 100% of the strains susceptible to ampicillin plus inhibitor and greater than or equal to 90% susceptible to the other combinations.

Sulbactam/ampicillin for treatment of polymicrobial pelvic infections

The increasing number of beta-lactam antibiotic-resistant bacteria observed in many strains of aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including Bacteroides species, has been well documented. Semisynthetic synthesis of penicillins and cephalosporins with increased resistance to beta-lactamase enzyme hydrolysis has not solved the problem. An alternative to therapy with newer agents is combination of an irreversible, suicide-type, beta-lactamase enzyme inhibitor such as sulbactam with a beta-lactam antibiotic such as ampicillin. Women with a variety of acute polymicrobial pelvic infections have been treated with the above combination, metronidazole or clindamycin combined with aminoglycoside, or cefoxitin in prospective trials. The clinical efficacy of 92.4%, in vitro bacteriological efficacy of 96.6%, and safety of sulbactam/ampicillin were comparable to that observed in women given comparative therapy. Penetration of pelvic tissues by sulbactam and ampicillin was excellent. Sulbactam/ampicillin is a viable alternative for the treatment of women with acute pelvic infections.