Stability of imipenem in Mueller-Hinton agar stored at 4 degrees C

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: now that the storm is finally here, how will timely detection help us fight back?

Acquired carbapenemases of the Ambler Classes A, B and D have gradually disseminated over the past decade among isolates of the Enterobacteriaceae family. Located on highly mobile genetic elements, these enzymes have established their presence in successful bacterial clones, signaling the prelude to a novel endemic era in the hospital setting. In such a context, prompt detection of carbapenemase-producing microorganisms seems warranted, not only for the selection of an appropriate antibiotic regimen, but also for organizing and implementing effective surveillance and infection control measures. However, issues regarding detection, confirmatory testing and characterization persist. Determination of carbapenemase production via susceptibility pattern interpretation may not always be feasible, confirmatory testing remains debatable and precise characterization is a challenge for the clinical laboratory. We aim to review the current situation from a laboratory point of view, highlighting the tools that have been proposed in an effort to help outline reliable screening and detection procedures, with inhibitor-based phenotypic testing as the cornerstone of these strategies, and discuss the necessity for implementing identification of possible producers in the everyday workflow.

Comparative evaluation of a prototype chromogenic medium (ChromID CARBA) for detecting carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in surveillance rectal swabs

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are an increasing problem worldwide, and rectal swab surveillance is recommended as a component of infection control programs. The performance of a prototype chromogenic medium (chromID CARBA) was evaluated and compared with media tested by four other screening methods: (i) overnight selective enrichment in 5 ml tryptic soy broth with a 10-μg ertapenem disk followed by plating onto MacConkey agar (CDC-TS), (ii) short selective enrichment in 9 ml brain heart infusion broth with a 10-μg ertapenem disk followed by plating onto chromID ESBL medium (ESBL-BH), (iii) direct plating onto chromID ESBL, and (iv) direct plating onto MacConkey agar supplemented with meropenem (1 μg/ml) (MCM). The screening methods were applied to detect CPE in 200 rectal swab specimens taken from different hospitalized patients. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility were performed by the Vitek 2 system. Carbapenem MICs were checked by Etest. Carbapenemase production was confirmed using the modified Hodge test, combined-disk tests, and PCR assays. In total, 133 presumptive CPE strains were detected. Phenotypic and genotypic assays confirmed 92 strains to be CPE (56 KPC-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae, 29 VIM-positive K. pneumoniae, and 7 KPC-positive Enterobacter aerogenes strains) recovered from 73 patients, while the remaining 41 strains were confirmed to be CPE negative (19 ESBL producers and 22 nonfermenters). chromID CARBA, ESBL-BH, and chromID ESBL exhibited the highest sensitivity (92.4%), followed by CDC-TS and MCM (89.1%) (P = 0.631). The specificity was greater for chromID CARBA (96.9%) and ESBL-BH (93.2%) than for CDC-TS (86.4%), MCM (85.2%), and chromID ESBL (84.7%) (P = 0.014). In conclusion, chromID CARBA was found to be a rapid and accurate culture screening method for active CPE surveillance.

Heteroresistance to meropenem in carbapenem-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii

The characteristics of carbapenem heteroresistance were studied in 14 apparently carbapenem-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. The MICs for carbapenems were determined, and the isolates were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and sequence typing (ST). Population analysis, testing of the stability of the heteroresistant subpopulations, and time-killing assays were performed. The agar dilution MICs of both imipenem and meropenem for the native isolates ranged from 0.25 to 4 mg/liter. The isolates belonged to nine PFGE types and exhibited seven ST allelic profiles. Population analysis revealed subpopulations that grew in the presence of imipenem at concentrations of up to 8 mg/liter and meropenem at concentrations of up to 32 mg/liter. The meropenem-heteroresistant subpopulations of 11 isolates exhibited stable resistance with MICs that ranged from 16 to >32 mg/liter; their PFGE profiles were identical to those of the native isolates. Time-kill assays with meropenem revealed less pronounced killing for 10 isolates. These findings indicate that meropenem pressure can produce meropenem-heteroresistant subpopulations that might subsequently select for highly resistant strains.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of carbapenems: multicenter validity testing and accuracy levels of five antimicrobial test methods for detecting resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

From January 1996 to May 1999, Project ICARE (Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology) received 448 nonduplicate clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa that were reported to be imipenem intermediate or resistant. However, broth microdilution (BMD) confirmatory testing at the Project ICARE central laboratory confirmed this result in only 11 of 123 (8.9%) Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 241 of 325 (74.2%) P. aeruginosa isolates. To investigate this overdetection of imipenem resistance, we tested 204 selected isolates from the Project ICARE collection plus five imipenem-resistant challenge strains at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention against imipenem and meropenem by agar dilution, disk diffusion, Etest (AB BIODISK North America, Inc., Piscataway, N.J.), two MicroScan WalkAway conventional panels (Neg MIC Plus 3 and Neg Urine Combo 3) (Dade MicroScan, Inc., West Sacramento, Calif.), and two Vitek cards (GNS-116 containing meropenem and GNS-F7 containing imipenem) (bioMérieux Vitek, Inc., Durham, N.C.). The results of each test method were compared to the results of BMD testing using in-house-prepared panels. Seven imipenem-resistant and five meropenem-resistant isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and 43 imipenem-resistant and 21 meropenem-resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa were identified by BMD. For Enterobacteriaceae, the imipenem and meropenem test methods produced low numbers of very major and major errors. All test systems in the study produced low numbers of very major and major errors when P. aeruginosa was tested against imipenem and meropenem, except for Vitek testing (major error rate for imipenem, 20%). Further testing conducted in 11 of the participating ICARE hospital laboratories failed to pinpoint the factors responsible for the initial overdetection of imipenem resistance. However, this study demonstrated that carbapenem testing difficulties do exist and that laboratories should consider using a second, independent antimicrobial susceptibility testing method to validate carbapenem-intermediate and -resistant results.

Discrepancies in susceptibility test results for imipenem employing different in vitro test methods and DIN 58,940 breakpoints

During the first half of 1993, bacteria that were isolated from clinical materials and found to have intermediate susceptibility by an agar dilution breakpoint method were collected in a large service laboratory in Germany. All of these isolates were gram-negative bacteria. They were re-tested employing full-scale agar dilution, broth microdilution, E-test and agar diffusion procedures. The results obtained indicated that 76.9% of the isolates were actually susceptible upon re-testing with a reference agar dilution technique. The reason for the discrepant results remained largely unclear. There was a high correlation between agar dilution and E-test results while the agreement with broth microdilution and agar diffusion was less satisfactory. It is suggested that the breakpoint between susceptible and intermediate categories currently recommended by DIN 58,940 (standard set by Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V.) be raised to reduce erroneous interpretations of minimum inhibitory concentrations.

Pharmacodynamic effects of extended dosing intervals of imipenem alone and in combination with amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro model

The pharmacodynamic effects of extended imipenem dosing intervals were studied against two strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853 and an imipenem-resistant mutant, 27853R) in an in vitro model of infection. Imipenem was administered as monotherapy (simulated 1-g bolus every 8 or every 12 h) and in combination with amikacin (7.5-mg/kg bolus every 12 h or a 15-mg/kg bolus once). Monotherapy with imipenem administered every 8 h was equally bactericidal at 24 h compared with regimens combined with amikacin for ATCC 27853. Imipenem administered every 12 h against the sensitive strain and both imipenem monotherapy regimens against the resistant strain demonstrated regrowth at 24 h. Although both amikacin regimens administered as monotherapy resulted in rapid bacterial killing activity with respect to time to a 99.9% reduction in log10 CFU/milliliter, regrowth at 24 h was observed at levels reaching or exceeding the initial inoculum. All combination regimens resulted in no detectable growth by 24 h regardless of dosing interval for either drug or initial susceptibility to imipenem. Results from this study indicate the potential for several novel dosing regimens against P. aeruginosa. Monotherapy with imipenem, 1 g every 8 h, was effective against a sensitive strain of P. aeruginosa. Combination therapy with imipenem and once-daily or twice-daily amikacin resulted in increased killing activity against imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. Once-daily or twice-daily amikacin in combination therapy, regardless of P. aeruginosa susceptibility, allowed for extension of imipenem dosing intervals.

Pseudoresistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resulting from degradation of imipenem in an automated susceptibility testing system with predried panels

During the use of a single lot of custom breakpoint panels (Sensititre; Radiometer America Inc., Westlake, Ohio), imipenem susceptibility declined from 70 to 44% for clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. With a new lot, susceptibility increased to 73%. Subsequent evaluations with P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 revealed a similar susceptibility pattern and an increase in the MIC of imipenem when determined in panels with increasing ages. Imipenem concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography by using 11 different lots of MIC and breakpoint panels (139 to 893 days of age). The amount of imipenem remaining declined from 94.4 to 13.8% (r = 0.9225) over the age range of the panels. These data suggest that imipenem in Sensititre MIC and breakpoint panels degrades over time and that the decrease in imipenem may be largely responsible for the decline in P. aeruginosa susceptibility.

Descriptive statistical analyses of serial dilution data

The serial dilution assay (for example, an in vitro antimicrobic susceptibility test or a serum antibody titer assay) is an important technique in biomedical research. The structure of the experiment forces grouping of the threshold concentrations into intervals. Statistical methods to analyse threshold concentrations from a batch of serial dilution assays should account for the grouping of the data. Many traditional subject area analyses, however, ignore the grouped nature of the data. This article discusses the discrepancy between the traditional subject area approach and the usual statistical approach for analysing such grouped data.