Serum bactericidal rate as measure of antibiotic interactions

Phytochemical Profiling of Lavandula coronopifolia Poir. Aerial Parts Extract and Its Larvicidal, Antibacterial, and Antibiofilm Activity Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Infections associated with the emergence of multidrug resistance and mosquito-borne diseases have resulted in serious crises associated with high mortality and left behind a huge socioeconomic burden. The chemical investigation of Lavandulacoronopifolia aerial parts extract using HPLC-MS/MS led to the tentative identification of 46 compounds belonging to phenolic acids, flavonoids and their glycosides, and biflavonoids. The extract displayed larvicidal activity against Culex pipiens larvae (LC50 = 29.08 µg/mL at 72 h). It significantly inhibited cytochrome P-450 monooxygenase (CYP450), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and carboxylesterase (CarE) enzymes with the comparable pattern to the control group, which could explain the mode of larvae toxification. The extract also inhibited the biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by 17-38% at different Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) (0.5-0.125 mg/mL) while the activity was doubled when combined with ciprofloxacin (ratio = 1:1 v:v). In conclusion, the wild plant, L.coronopifolia, can be considered a promising natural source against resistant bacteria and infectious carriers.

Pharmacodynamic Properties of Antibiotics: Application to Drug Monitoring and Dosage Regimen Design

The goal of antimicrobial chemotherapy is to effectively eradicate pathogenic organisms while minimizing the likelihood of drug-related adverse effects. In this era of cost containment, consideration should also be given to performing this task with the smallest total dose of drug and the shortest duration of therapy. Determination of the appropriate dose and dosing interval of an antimicrobial requires knowledge and integration of both its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.

Determination of fungicidal activities against yeasts and molds: lessons learned from bactericidal testing and the need for standardization

In certain unique clinical settings, the ability of the antimicrobial agent administered to kill the pathogen outright may be quite important. These situations invariably involve infection of a site not easily accessed by host defenses and/or of a structure with essential anatomic or physiologic function such as the heart (endocarditis), central nervous system (meningitis), or bone (osteomyelitis). Likewise, infections in immunosuppressed hosts, especially those who are neutropenic, are often thought to require microbicidal therapy. Proof of the cidal nature of an antimicrobial agent in vitro is tedious, complex, and fraught with error. Although several methods for assessing in vitro bactericidal activity have been standardized (NCCLS M26-A and M21-A), the clinical relevance of these determinations is questionable and the tests are performed infrequently in most laboratories. Most of the clinical data supporting the need for microbicidal therapy and testing have focused on bacterial infections. However, given the fact that most serious fungal infections occur in profoundly immunosuppressed individuals, it is generally assumed that a cidal regimen would be preferable in that setting as well. In view of this clinical concern and the perceived need to assess the fungicidal activity of a variety of agents, we considered that it would be useful to review what is known about the issues and problems in assessing bactericidal activity and the clinical utility of such measurements. Following this review, we discuss the issue of how one defines fungicidal activity in vitro and in vivo and how feasible it might be to determine the fungicidal activity of organism-drug combinations for purposes of both drug development and clinical care. Proposed methods for fungal time-kill determinations and minimal fungicidal concentration determinations are also discussed.

Prediction of in-vivo efficacy by in-vitro early bactericidal activity with oral beta-lactams, in a dose-ranging immunocompetent mouse sepsis model, using strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae with decreasing susceptibilities to penicillin

Killing curves and a sepsis model were performed with Streptococcus pneumoniae strains (MICs of penicillin = 0.01, 1, 2 and 4 mg/L) to assess the in vivo effect of in vitro early bactericidal activity. Optimal bactericidal concentration (OBC) was defined as the minimal concentration needed to obtain the maximal bactericidal activity during the sampling time for colony counting in killing curves. Animals were treated with amoxycillin, cefuroxime or cefpodoxime every 8 h for 48 h, with doses ranging from 2.5 to 50 mg/kg. ED100 (minimal antibiotic dose obtaining a 100% survival) was used as efficacy endpoint. Cmax/MIC, AUC/MIC and deltaT >MIC did not accurately predict efficacy against the most resistant strains, deltaT >OBC being the most predictive efficacy parameter indicating the in vivo effect of early bactericidal activity. Lower deltaT >OBC values for amoxycilin vs oral cehalosporins were needed for efficacy. The higher early bactericidal activity of amoxycillin may explain its higher in vivo efficacy.

Pharmacodynamic modeling of bacterial kinetics: beta-lactam antibiotics against Escherichia coli

A simple pharmacodynamic model has been developed to describe the bacterial kinetics exhibited by beta-lactam antibiotics. In contrast with previous models that only characterized the early killing phase of a time-kill curve, the present model is capable of simultaneously describing both the killing and regrowth phases. The model relied on the use of both first-order bactericidal and resistance formation rate constants to accurately define the time-dependent changes in the bacterial populations of an antibiotic-treated culture. The concentration dependency of the bactericidal rate constant was further delineated using a saturable-receptor model. Furthermore, an exponential decrease in the resistance formation rate with increasing antibiotic concentrations was demonstrated. The evolving pharmacodynamic model was also explored via computer simulations by perturbing the two governing rate constants. The model was subsequently applied to the description of time-kill data for amoxicillin, penicillin G, and cephalexin against Escherichia coli. The description of amdinocillin's action against E. coli was not as comprehensive because of the existence of a second killing phase. However, this model can be applicable to many classes of antibiotics that display the usual killing and regrowth phases in time-kill studies. The pharmacodynamic model can potentially improve the prediction of bacterial killing and regrowth and foster an improved understanding of complex antimicrobial pharmacodynamics.

The fractional maximal effect method: a new way to characterize the effect of antibiotic combinations and other nonlinear pharmacodynamic interactions

The checkerboard technique leading to the fractional inhibitory concentration indexes and the killing curve method are currently the most widely used methods to study antibiotic combinations. For both methods, experimental conditions and interpretation criteria are somewhat arbitrary. The relevance of the fractional inhibitory concentration index computation, in the classic case of additivity [P = d1/(D1)p + d2/(D2)p, where d1 and d2 are the doses of drugs 1 and 2 in combination to produce an effect at a percent level (P) and (D1)p and (D2)p are the doses required for the two respective drugs alone to produce the same effect] relies on the assumption of a linear relationship between the MIC and the concentration of the test antibiotics. In addition, there is no consensus as to the definition of synergy in killing curve interpretation. The fractional maximal effect (FME) method is a new approach which was developed to handle the nonlinear pharmacodynamics exhibited by antibiotics and other drugs. This method relies on the mathematical linearization of the nonlinear concentration-effect scales and eventual construction of an isobologram-type data plot. The FME method was applied to study interactions between several antibiotic combinations: amoxicillin and tetracycline, ciprofloxacin and erythromycin, and ticarcillin and tobramycin. These combinations were selected because the pharmacologic basis for their interactions has been previously described. The FME method correctly identified antagonism for the first two combinations and synergism for the last combination. Conclusions were reproducible across the range of concentrations studied. Besides providing information on the nature of the interaction, the method can rapidly explore the effect of changing concentration ratios of two antimicrobial agents on the degrees of interaction. The FME method may be applied to interactions between drugs or agents with either a linear or nonlinear endpoint measurement. Methods frequently used for drug combination testing are also discussed in the paper.

Tests for bactericidal effects of antimicrobial agents: technical performance and clinical relevance

Bactericidal testing has been used for several decades as a guide for antimicrobial therapy of serious infections. Such testing is most frequently performed when bactericidal antimicrobial agent therapy is considered necessary (such as when treating infectious endocarditis or infection in an immunocompromised host). It has also been used to ensure that the infecting organism is killed by (not tolerant to) usually bactericidal compounds. However, few data are available to support the role of such tests in direct patient care. Several important variables affect the reproducibility of the test results; however, proposed reference methods are now available for performing the MBC test. With minor modifications, these can provide a standardized approach for laboratories that need to perform them. Currently, little evidence is available to support the routine use of such testing for the care of individual patients. However, testing of new (investigational) antimicrobial agents can be beneficial in determining their potential to provide bactericidal antimicrobial activity during clinical use. New methods to assess bactericidal activity are being developed, but as yet none have been rigorously tested in patient care settings; further, for most of these methods, little information is available as to which technical parameters affect their results. In clinical laboratories, all bactericidal tests must be performed with rigorously standardized techniques and adequate controls, bearing in mind the limitations of the currently available test procedures.

Single-dose antibiotic therapy: what has the past taught us?

The proper dosage schedule of antibiotics has generally been determined empirically, due to the difficulty of clinical trials. Initially, the dosage was chosen to allow high sustained levels greater than MIC in the blood. Antibiotics (beta lactams, tetracyclins, macrolides) were given at high doses three to six times daily, whatever their kinetic properties. The data obtained by Eagle3 with beta lactams in animal models of streptococcal and treponemal infections outlined the importance of interval between doses on the in vivo efficacy. They also showed that increasing the dose of penicillin had a positive effect on the bactericidal activity only through the persistence of effective levels (greater than MIC) at the site of infection. Further illustrations were given through experimental and clinical studies with beta lactams or other compounds on different types of infections: LRTIs, UTIs, meningitis, and endocarditis. The importance of both dynamic (i.e., pattern of bactericidal effect) and kinetic (elimination half-life) parameters was thus further identified. Information on toxicity with some compounds with a narrow therapeutic index, such as aminoglycosides, indicated that increasing the dose to enhance efficacy had some limitations. This led to numerous studies on the relations between concentration and toxicity, stating that nephro- or ototoxicity were not directly related to peak level in serum. Experimental studies showed that OD administration of aminoglycosides was both more efficient and less toxic than the multiple-dose regimen of the same daily amount. Economic considerations progressively justified attempts to both reduce the dose and the work load related to multiple administrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Considerations in dosage selection for third generation cephalosporins

Pharmacokinetic parameters of third generation cephalosporins vary widely, requiring different dosage regimens and adjustment methods for each agent. Although their antibacterial spectrum favours their usage in infections caused by aerobic Gram-negative organisms, due to their limited post-antibiotic effect against these organisms, dosage regimens should ensure that free drug concentrations at the site of infection remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration for as much of the dosage interval as possible in patients with normal host defence mechanisms and for the entire dosage interval in immunocompromised patients. Altered protein binding encountered in various disease states can affect both microbiological and pharmacokinetic properties especially for drugs with high protein binding. Since the concentrations at the site of action are often different from those in serum, a higher or lower range of dosages needs to be selected depending on the target site. Decreased renal function affects the elimination of most third generation cephalosporins, whereas the presence of hepatic disease does not generally necessitate dosage adjustment. Because of the complex age-related physiological changes in paediatric and elderly patients, dosage should be adjusted on the basis of the reported pharmacokinetic data in these populations. The usual recommended dose may or may not be optimal in a given condition depending on the complex interactions between pharmacokinetic, microbiological and other host factors.

Pharmacodynamic properties of antibiotics: application to drug monitoring and dosage regimen design

The goal of antimicrobial chemotherapy is to effectively eradicate pathogenic organisms while minimizing the likelihood of drug-related adverse effects. In this era of cost containment, consideration should also be given to performing this task with the smallest total dose of drug and the shortest duration of therapy. Determination of the appropriate dose and dosing interval of an antimicrobial requires knowledge and integration of both its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.

Ex vivo study of serum bactericidal titers and killing rates of daptomycin (LY146032) combined or not combined with amikacin compared with those of vancomycin

Twelve volunteers, in two groups of six, received daptomycin at a dose of 1 or 2 mg/kg. In addition, they received in a randomly allocated order amikacin (500 mg), daptomycin-amikacin, and vancomycin (500 mg). Thirty-five clinical isolates, including Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, Corynebacterium sp. group JK, and Enterococcus faecalis, were tested in vitro for the measure of the serum bactericidal titers and killing rates. The mean peak concentrations of daptomycin in serum 1 h after the administration of 1 and 2 mg/kg were 11 and 20 micrograms/ml, respectively. At 24 h after the administration of 2 mg/kg, the mean level in serum was 1.9 micrograms/ml, which is higher than the MICs for susceptible pathogens. Daptomycin and amikacin provided identical concentrations in serum whether given alone or in combination. Among the six regimens tested, those including daptomycin provided the highest and the most prolonged serum bactericidal titers against S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and E. faecalis. The killing rates measured by the killing curves were correlated with the concentration/MIC and concentration/MBC ratios of daptomycin for all strains tested. Significant killing occurred once the concentration of daptomycin in the serum 4- to 6-fold the MIC or 1- to 1.2-fold the MBC. The combination of daptomycin and amikacin had no effect on either the serum bactericidal titers or the rates of killing. Only vancomycin provided significant killing of the strains of Corynebacterium sp. group JK.

Antipseudomonal activity of simulated infusions of gentamicin alone or with piperacillin assessed by serum bactericidal rate and area under the killing curve

The objectives of this study were to (i) determine which of three simulated dosing regimens (gentamicin alone, simultaneous infusions of gentamicin and piperacillin, or staggered infusions of gentamicin and piperacillin) produced the fastest killing rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in serum, using the serum bactericidal rate (SBR) assay; and (ii) describe an alternative method of analysis of killing curves, the area under the killing curve (AUKC). Gentamicin alone or combined with piperacillin was added to heat-inactivated human serum to approximate drug concentrations achieved after the above-mentioned types of infusion. By a microdilution technique, seven strains of P. aeruginosa were exposed to no drug (control) and gentamicin alone or with piperacillin; colony counts were determined at hourly intervals for 5 h, and log10 CFU per milliliter was plotted versus time. Linear regression was used to calculate the slope (SBR) of each timed killing curve for each drug concentration tested alone or in combination. In addition, the AUKC for each curve was calculated. To compare simulated infusion regimens further, the cumulative AUKC (the sum of AUKCs for specific time points along the serum concentration-time curve for each simulated regimen) was calculated. With the SBR assay or AUKC determination, there was a significant increase in the rate of killing of all test strains by the combination compared with gentamicin alone only at gentamicin concentrations which exceeded the MIC (8, 5, and 2.5 micrograms/ml). Mean cumulative AUKC of the simultaneous-infusion regimen was significantly less (indicating faster killing) than either the staggered-infusion regimen or the gentamicin infusion alone. Both the SBR and AUKC have the potential for integration of in vitro microbiologic effects and in vivo pharmacokinetics of antimicrobial agents.

Serum bactericidal activity against Enterobacteriaceae producing broad-spectrum beta-lactamases in volunteers administered ofloxacin and cefotaxime, alone or combined

The activity of ofloxacin and cefotaxime, alone or combined, against four strains of Enterobacteriaceae was evaluated both in vitro and in sera from volunteers given a single infusion over 30 min of 200 mg ofloxacin or 1 g cefotaxime. The strains showed resistance or decreased susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins. The combination was not found to be synergistic in vitro. Analysis of the bactericidal titres and killing kinetics of sera taken at the time of the peak concentration and 6 h after the infusion, respectively, confirmed the absence of synergy between the drugs against these strains.

Susceptibility testing today: myth, reality, and new direction

Recent concerns about the clinical relevance of susceptibility testing echo those expressed previously by a number of authors.’-” These concerns are well founded and are perhaps even more important today because of the proliferation of new antibiotics and the changes in reimbursement philosophy.” Ultimately, the question becomes that raised by David Greenwood: “In vitro veritas?” The following discussion will review the role of susceptibility testing in clinical medicine with emphasis on myth versus reality. In addition, new directions for susceptibility testing that promise increased clinical relevance will be covered.

Antibiotic combinations: should they be tested?

When antibiotic combinations are used to provide a broader spectrum of antimicrobial activity or in an attempt to prevent the emergence of resistant organisms, it is rarely necessary or practical to perform tests of drug interactions in vitro. In vitro testing of combinations may be useful when combinations are used in an attempt to attain synergistic interactions. In some cases, screening methods can be used as substitutes for formal synergy testing. This paper examines the mechanisms of antibiotic interaction leading to synergism or antagonism, surveys attempts to correlate in vitro observations with efficacy in animal models, and reviews clinical data providing evidence for or against a useful role of synergistic antibiotic interactions in the treatment of human infections.

Pulse dosing versus continuous infusion of antibiotics. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations

The issue of whether it is better to administer antibiotics as an intermittent bolus dose or a continuous intravenous infusion has been debated for several decades. This paper reviews the extensive literature on the topic, considering both the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of antibacterials as well as experimental results from studies conducted in vitro, in animals and in humans. It is evident from reviewing the literature that neither mode of administration is clearly superior to the other. The decision regarding the mode of administration must take into account the antibiotic being used, the bacteria, the patient and the infection, as well as the pharmacokinetics of the particular drug in the individual patient. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) are useful indicators of the relative in vitro effectiveness of antibiotics, but it is not clear what relevance these parameters have to the desired antibiotic concentrations in vivo. Furthermore, questions of serum vs tissue fluid concentrations, peak concentrations vs AUC, and free vs total concentration are all important issues to consider in assessing the optimal mode of administration. The importance of newer indices such as the post-antibiotic effect are now beginning to be recognised. A number of scientists are actively engaged in developing a system to identify the most appropriate mode of administration based upon the integration of an antibiotic's pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. Within the next few years we anticipate that appropriate guidelines should have been developed to aid the optimisation of parenteral administration, at least for some antibiotics.