High-pressure liquid chromatography and microbiological assay of serum ofloxacin levels in adults receiving intravenous and oral therapy for skin infections

Selection of appropriate analytical tools to determine the potency and bioactivity of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance

Antibiotics are the chemotherapeutic agents that kill or inhibit the pathogenic microorganisms. Resistance of microorganism to antibiotics is a growing problem around the world due to indiscriminate and irrational use of antibiotics. In order to overcome the resistance problem and to safely use antibiotics, the correct measurement of potency and bioactivity of antibiotics is essential. Microbiological assay and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method are used to quantify the potency of antibiotics. HPLC method is commonly used for the quantification of potency of antibiotics, but unable to determine the bioactivity; whereas microbiological assay estimates both potency and bioactivity of antibiotics. Additionally, bioassay is used to estimate the effective dose against antibiotic resistant microbes.

Simultaneously, microbiological assay addresses the several parameters such as minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), mutation prevention concentration (MPC) and critical concentration (Ccr) which are used to describe the potency in a more informative way. Microbiological assay is a simple, sensitive, precise and cost effective method which gives reproducible results similar to HPLC. However, the HPLC cannot be a complete substitute for microbiological assay and both methods have their own significance to obtain more realistic and precise results.

Sequential antibiotic therapy: Effective cost management and patient care

The escalating costs associated with antimicrobial chemotherapy have become of increasing concern to physicians, pharmacists and patients alike. A number of strategies have been developed to address this problem. This article focuses specifically on sequential antibiotic therapy (sat), which is the strategy of converting patients from intravenous to oral medication regardless of whether the same or a different class of drug is used. Advantages of sat include economic benefits, patient benefits and benefits to the health care provider. Potential disadvantages are cost to the consumer and the risk of therapeutic failure. A critical review of the published literature shows that evidence from randomized controlled trials supports the role of sat. However, it is also clear that further studies are necessary to determine the optimal time for intravenous to oral changeover and to identify the variables that may interfere with the use of oral drugs. Procedures necessary for the implementation of a sat program in the hospital setting are also discussed.

validated microbiological and HPLC methods for the determination of moxifloxacin in pharmaceutical preparations and human plasma

The article presents a comparison between microbiological and high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) assays for quantification of moxifloxacin in tablets, ophthalmic solutions and human plasma. The microbiological method employed a cylinder-plate agar diffusion assay using a strain of Esherichia coli ATCC 25922 as the test organism and phosphate buffer (pH8) as the diluent. The calibration curves were linear (R² > 0.98) over a concentration range of 0.125 to 16 µgml^-1. The within day and between days precisions were ≤ 4.47% and ≤ 6.39% respectively. Recovery values were between 89.4 and 110.2%. The HPLC assay used Hypersil^® BDS C₁₈ reversed phase column (250×4.6 mm, 5µm) with a mobile phase comprising 20 mM ammonium dihydrogen orthophosphate (pH3) and acetonitrile (75:25) and flowing at 1.5 ml/min. The detection was at 295nm. The calibration curves were linear (R² > 0.999) over the range of 0.125 to 16 µg ml^-1. The within day and between days precisions were ≤ 4.07% and ≤ 5.09% respectively. Recovery values were between 97.7 and 107.6%. Similar potencies were obtained after the analysis of moxifloxacin tablets and ophthalmic solutions by both methods. Also pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated after the analysis of plasma samples of six male healthhy volunteers by both validated methods.

Pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin after single intravenous and repeat oral administration to cats

The pharmacokinetic properties of the fluoroquinolone levofloxacin, were investigated in five cats after single intravenous and repeat oral administration at a daily dose of 10 mg/kg. Levofloxacin serum concentration was analyzed by microbiological assay using Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 10031 as test microorganism. Serum levofloxacin disposition after intravenous and oral dosing was best fitted to a bicompartmental and a monocompartmental open models with first-order elimination, respectively. After intravenous administration, distribution was rapid (t(1/2(d)) 0.26 +/- 0.18 h) and wide as reflected by the steady-state volume of distribution of 1.75 +/- 0.42 L/kg. Drug elimination was slow with a total body clearance of 0.14 +/- 0.04 L/h.kg and a t(1/2) for this process of 9.31 +/- 1.63 h. The mean residence time was of 12.99 +/- 2.12 h. After repeat oral administration, absorption half-life was of 0.18 +/- 0.12 h and Tmax of 1.62 +/- 0.84 h. The bioavailability was high (86.27 +/- 43.73%) with a peak plasma concentration at the steady state of 4.70 +/- 0.91 microg/mL. Drug accumulation was not significant after four oral administrations. Estimated efficacy predictors for levofloxacin after either intravenous or oral administration indicate a good profile against bacteria with a MIC value below of 0.5 microg/mL. However, for microorganisms with MIC values of 1 microg/mL it would be efficacious only when administered intravenously.

An HPLC assay and a microbiological assay to determine levofloxacin in soft tissue, bone, bile and serum

A simple, specific and sensitive HPLC assay for levofloxacin in serum, bile, soft tissue and bone was evaluated and validated. The samples were prepared by protein precipitation with acids and methanol, which yielded high recoveries (for serum and bile>98% and for bone and soft tissue>90%). The compounds were separated on a reversed phase column with an acidic mobile phase containing triethylamine. The eluate was monitored by fluorescence detection. The HPLC assay is linear over the usable concentration range (0.1-40 microg/ml) and it provides good validation data for accuracy and precision. Although comparison of HPLC results to the results of a microbiological assay showed congruent results (regression coefficients>0.967). HPLC should be the method of choice for determination of levofloxacin in biological matrices.

A reproducible, simple and sensitive HPLC assay for determination of ofloxacin in plasma and lung tissue. Application in pharmacokinetic studies

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method with fluorometric detection was developed for the analysis of ofloxacin in plasma and lung tissue. The detection was performed at 280 nm for excitation and 500 nm for emission. The procedure involves the addition of an internal standard followed by treatment of the samples with acetonitrile and dichloromethane. The proposed technique is reproducible, selective, reliable and sensitive. Linear detector response was observed for the calibration curve standards in the range of 0.1-5 micrograms ml-1 for plasma and 0.025-2.5 micrograms g-1 for lung tissue. The limit of quantitation is 5 ng ml-1 or 5 ng g-1. The accuracy of the method is good; that is, the relative error is < 10%. This method was applied to the pharmacokinetic study of ofloxacin in 24 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.

Comparative prophylactic efficacies of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, cefazolin, and vancomycin in experimental model of staphylococcal wound infection

Recent shifts in the species and antibiotic resistance patterns of bacteria causing nosocomial infections present new challenges for providing effective prophylaxis in surgery. Traditional regimens lack activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci and many gram-negative species causing nosocomial infections. The new fluoroquinolones exhibit in vitro activity against many emerging surgical wound pathogens. To determine the potential of this class of antimicrobial agents for use in surgery, we compared the prophylactic efficacies of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin with those of cefazolin and vancomycin in a guinea pig model of abscess formation. Four Staphylococcus aureus strains, one Staphylococcus epidermidis strain, and one Staphylococcus haemolyticus strain were evaluated. Vancomycin was the most effective prophylactic agent, exhibiting in vivo activity against all strains which was superior or equivalent to those of all other agents tested. Cefazolin was the least effective agent and surpassed the two quinolones in prophylactic efficacy against only one organism, a quinolone- and methicillin-resistant strain of S. aureus. The two quinolones provided excellent protection against infection with all but the quinolone-resistant isolate. The in vivo emergence of quinolone resistance among quinolone-susceptible isolates was not detected. The methicillin-resistant, quinolone-susceptible S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus isolates were extremely susceptible to prophylaxis, exhibiting 50% infective doses above 4 x 10(6) CFU for seven of the eight antibiotic-strain combinations. We conclude that ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin may be effective antistaphylococcal agents in surgery. The role of these agents remains to be defined, and the definition should include consideration of an adverse effect upon antibiotic resistance patterns of organisms causing nosocomial infections.

Bioequivalence of oral and intravenous ofloxacin after multiple-dose administration to healthy male volunteers

The bioequivalence of oral and intravenous ofloxacin was investigated after the administration of multiple doses of 400 mg every 12 h to 20 healthy male volunteers in a randomized, crossover, open-label study. Ofloxacin concentrations in plasma were evaluated after 4 days of oral or intravenous (1-h infusion) dosing with a 3-day wash-out period between regimens. As expected, delivery to the systemic circulation took slightly longer after the oral dosing (time to maximum concentration of drug in serum of 1.7 h) relative to the 1-h intravenous infusion, but the systemic availabilities of ofloxacin by the two routes of administration were equivalent (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h ratio of 95%). Since previous studies have not demonstrated any change in the bioavailability of ofloxacin in infectious disease patients, this study supports the interchangeability of these dosing regimens.