Distribution of ciprofloxacin in ascitic fluid following administration of a single oral dose of 750 milligrams

A Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model to Describe Ciprofloxacin Pharmacokinetics Over the Entire Span of Life

Background

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling has received growing interest as a useful tool for the assessment of drug pharmacokinetics by continuous knowledge integration.

Objective

The objective of this study was to build a ciprofloxacin PBPK model for intravenous and oral dosing based on a comprehensive literature review, and evaluate the predictive performance towards pediatric and geriatric patients.

Methods

The aim of this report was to establish confidence in simulations of the ciprofloxacin PBPK model along the development process to facilitate reliable predictions outside of the tested adult age range towards the extremes of ages. Therefore, mean data of 69 published clinical trials were identified and integrated into the model building, simulation and verification process. The predictive performance on both ends of the age scale was assessed using individual data of 258 subjects observed in own clinical trials.

Results

Ciprofloxacin model verification demonstrated no concentration-related bias and accurate simulations for the adult age range, with only 4.8% of the mean observed data points for intravenous administration and 12.1% for oral administration being outside the simulated twofold range. Predictions towards the extremes of ages for the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) and the maximum plasma concentration (C_max) over the entire span of life revealed a reliable estimation, with only two pediatric AUC observations outside the 90% prediction interval.

Conclusion

Overall, this ciprofloxacin PBPK modeling approach demonstrated the predictive power of a thoroughly informed middle-out approach towards age groups of interest to potentially support the decision-making process.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40262-018-0661-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of the ertapenem-non-susceptible non-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales isolates causing intra-abdominal infections in the Asia-Pacific region during 2008-2014: Results from the Study for Monitoring the Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART)

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the susceptibility profiles amongst ertapenem-non-susceptible non-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (ETP-NS-non-CPE) isolates.

METHODS

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 404 ETP-NS-non-CPE isolates collected from different intra-abdominal infection (IAI) sites amongst patients in the Asia-Pacific region during 2008-2014 were determined using the broth microdilution method. The susceptibility results were interpreted according to the MIC breakpoints recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) in 2018. The MICs data of several agents were evaluated based on their published pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profiles.

RESULTS

The majority (>84%) of IAI-ETP-NS-non-CPE isolates - including Escherichia coli (n=83), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=91) and Enterobacter species (n=210) - were susceptible to imipenem and amikacin. The 193 hepatobiliary ETP-NS-non-CPE isolates exhibited a trend of lower cefepime MIC (≤4mg/L) distribution than those (n=145) cultured from the peritoneal space (P=0.058). Amongst the ETP-NS-non-CP Enterobacter isolates, 65.7% displayed a cefepime MIC≤4mg/L. In addition, compared with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, 82.9% and 72.9% of the ETP-NS-non-CP Enterobacter isolates were susceptible to levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively. Of note, 74.5% and 70.3% of the ETP-NS-non-CP Enterobacter isolates cultured from the hepatobiliary tract and peritoneal space exhibited a ciprofloxacin MIC≤2mg/L and ≤0.25mg/L, respectively. Imipenem and amikacin showed good in vitro susceptibility rates against the IAI-ETP-NS-non-CPE isolates. The hepatobiliary ETP-NS-non-CPE displayed lower cefepime MICs than those cultured from the peritoneal space. Additionally, a significant fraction of IAI-ETP-NS-non-CP Enterobacter isolates exhibited ciprofloxacin MIC ≤ 2mg/L.

CONCLUSION

Based upon the PK/PD analyses, ciprofloxacin, imipenem and cefepime are probably effective against IAI-ETP-NS-non-CPE isolates.

Systematic review: fluoroquinolones for the treatment of intra-abdominal surgical infections

BACKGROUND

Intra-abdominal infections result in substantial morbidity and mortality. Fluoroquinolones are among the various regimens that are used for the treatment of these infections.

AIM

To evaluate the available data from laboratory and clinical studies regarding the use of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infections.

METHODS

We searched for relevant laboratory and clinical studies in the PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases.

RESULTS

Good pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of fluoroquinolones in inflamed abdominal tissue are reported in several laboratory studies. In six prospective non-randomized clinical studies of patients with intra-abdominal infections, the clinical success achieved with the use of fluoroquinolones ranged from 77% to 94%. In 10 randomized-controlled trials fluoroquinolone-based regimens were compared with other commonly used (mainly beta-lactam-based) regimens. Clinical success, bacterial eradication, withdrawal because of toxicity and mortality were similar between the compared treatment arms except from two randomized-controlled trials, in which clinical success was statistically higher in the fluoroquinolone treatment arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroquinolones seem to be an effective and relatively safe option for the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infections.

Analysis of fluoroquinolones in biological fluids by high-performance liquid chromatography

High-performance liquid chromatographic methods for the analysis of fluoroquinolones in biological fluids are reviewed. In particular, sample preparation and handling procedures, chromatographic conditions, and detection methods are discussed. A summary of published high-performance liquid chromatographic assays for individual fluoroquinolones is included.

Bioavailability of ciprofloxacin after multiple enteral and intravenous doses in ICU patients with severe gram-negative intra-abdominal infections

BACKGROUND

Few data are available on the pharmacokinetics of multiple enteral dosing of ciprofloxacin in critically ill intensive care patients and none for those with severe gram-negative intra-abdominal infections (GNIAI).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the bioavailability of enteral ciprofloxacin in tube-fed intensive care patients with severe GNIAI.

DESIGN

A randomized crossover study.

SETTING

University-based medical center.

PATIENTS

5 critically ill intensive care patients with GNIAI and an estimated creatinine clearance > 25 ml/ min who received continuous tube feeding.

INTERVENTIONS

Multiple doses of enteral 750 mg b.i.d. versus 400 mg b.i.d.i.v. ciprofloxacin.

MEASUREMENTS

The calculated 12-h area under the serum concentration versus time curve after 750 mg b.i.d. enteral dosing was equivalent to that after 400 mg b.i.d.i.v. The mean bioavailability of enteral dosing was 53.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 43.5-62.8]. In seven additional patients, the mean serum steady-state concentration at 2 h after enteral administration was 3.9 microg/ml (95% CI 1.9-5.9), not significantly different from that found in the crossover study (p = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

In tube-fed intensive care patients with severe GNIAI, the bioavailability of enteral ciprofloxacin is adequate.

Results of a randomized trial comparing sequential intravenous/oral treatment with ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole to imipenem/cilastatin for intra-abdominal infections. The Intra-Abdominal Infection Study Group

OBJECTIVE

In a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial, ciprofloxacin/metronidazole was compared with imipenem/cilastatin for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. A secondary objective was to demonstrate the ability to switch responding patients from intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) therapy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Intra-abdominal infections result in substantial morbidity, mortality, and cost. Antimicrobial therapy often includes a 7- to 10-day intravenous course. The use of oral antimicrobials is a recent advance due to the availability of agents with good tissue pharmacokinetics and potent aerobic gram-negative activity.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to either ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole intravenously (CIP/MTZ IV) or imipenem intravenously (IMI IV) throughout their treatment course, or ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole intravenously and treatment with oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole when oral feeding was resumed (CIP/MTZ IV/PO).

RESULTS

Among 671 patients who constituted the intent-to-treat population, overall success rates were as follows: 82% for the group treated with CIP/MTZ IV; 84% for the CIP/MTZ IV/PO group; and 82% for the IMI IV group. For 330 valid patients, treatment success occurred in 84% of patients treated with CIP/MTZ IV, 86% of those treated with CIP/MTZ IV/PO, and 81% of the patients treated with IMI IV. Analysis of microbiology in the 30 patients undergoing intervention after treatment failure suggested that persistence of gram-negative organisms was more common in the IMI IV-treated patients who subsequently failed. Of 46 CIP/MTZ IV/PO patients (active oral arm), treatment success occurred in 96%, compared with 89% for those treated with CIP/MTZ IV and 89% for those receiving IMI IV. Patients who received intravenous/oral therapy were treated, overall, for an average of 8.6 +/- 3.6 days, with an average of 4.0 +/- 3.0 days of oral treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate statistical equivalence between CIP/MTZ IV and IMI IV in both the intent-to-treat and valid populations. Conversion to oral therapy with CIP/MTZ appears as effective as continued intravenous therapy in patients able to tolerate oral feedings.

Antimicrobial activity of 11 newer and investigational drugs tested against aerobic isolates from spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

The in vitro susceptibility of 124 aerobic bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) were tested against 11 antimicrobial agents, including parenteral or oral cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. Most SBP isolates were Gram-negative organisms, and Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were responsible for 63% of the episodes evaluated. The fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin) and the "fourth-generation" cephalosporin cefpirome were the most active agents against the Gram-negative bacteria. Commonly used cefotaxime and cefotaxime-desacetylcefotaxime (DES-CTX) combinations were also very active against Gram-negative bacteria with only few Enterobacter cloacae isolates being resistant (minimum inhibitory concentrations > 32 micrograms/ml). All streptococci were susceptible to cefotaxime, cefpirome, and cefdaloxime and to the cefotaxime-DES-CTX combinations, whereas only ofloxacin demonstrated acceptable activity against the enterococci. The widest spectrum of activity versus SBP isolates was found for ofloxacin (98% susceptibility) among the fluoroquinolones. For the beta-lactams, the widest spectrum of activity was demonstrated by cefpirome and the 2:1 cefotaxime-DES-CTX combination (93% susceptibility). These results indicate that the role of ofloxacin and newer parenteral or orally administered cephalosporins in the treatment of prophylaxis of SBP should be further evaluated.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of newer antibacterial agents in liver disease

Liver disease may produce significant, albeit highly variable, effects on the pharmacokinetic behaviour of antibiotics in serum. Drug disposition may be altered through several pathophysiological mechanisms including reduced hepatobiliary clearance, and modifications in the volume of distribution induced by albumin synthesis deficiency or portal hypertension-related ascites. Antibacterial agents are not affected by potential alteration in hepatic first-pass effects. Only liver cirrhosis-induced effects on serum pharmacokinetics of antibiotics have been extensively studied, unlike those possibly produced by other forms of liver disease. In liver cirrhosis, pharmacokinetic alterations of nearly all beta-lactam or quinolone agents appear not to be marked enough to require dosage adjustment, provided that renal function stays normal. Adaptation in therapeutic schedule, however, is warranted for those drugs that are substantially cleared by the hepatobiliary system, namely mezlocillin, clindamycin, erythromycin, pefloxacin, enoxacin, antituberculous agents or nitroimidazole derivatives. Special caution should also be exercised when using aminoglycosides or vancomycin because of the wide interpatient variability of their pharmacokinetic disposition and their toxic potential. When renal function is impaired and there is an increased volume of distribution due to ascites, as frequently observed in severe liver insufficiency, the elimination half-life of most antibiotics is markedly prolonged, resulting in potential side effects due to drug accumulation. Accordingly, dosage adjustment applies to all drugs. In this regard, it should be remembered that delineating the dosage guidelines for a given antibiotic on the basis of reported pharmacokinetic parameters in patients with liver cirrhosis is awkward and probably of limited value. This pattern is ascribed to large interpatient variability in the active hepatic cell mass, the degree of portal hypertension and the alteration of serum binding capacity. Furthermore, there is no way of predicting accurately the extent of liver insufficiency in an individual patient. Dosage reduction is thus done empirically in most cases. Whenever possible, direct measurements of serum antibiotic concentrations should be the reasonable approach to manage antibiotic therapy in this kind of clinical condition.