Penetration of cefprozil into tonsillar and adenoidal tissues

Have We Neglected to Study Target-Site Drug Exposure in Children? A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Drug dosing should ideally be based on the drug concentrations at the target site, which, for most drugs, corresponds to the tissue. The exact influence of growth and development on drug tissue distribution is unclear. This systematic review compiles the current knowledge on the tissue distribution of systemically applied drugs in children, with the aim to identify priorities in tissue pharmacokinetic (PK) research in this population.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in the MEDLINE and Embase databases.

RESULTS

Forty-two relevant articles were identified, of which 71% investigated antibiotics, while drug classes from the other studies were anticancer drugs, antifungals, anthelmintics, sedatives, thyreostatics, immunomodulators, antiarrhythmics, and exon skipping therapy. The majority of studies (83%) applied tissue biopsy as the sampling technique. Tonsil and/or adenoid tissue was most frequently examined (70% of all included patients). The majority of studies had a small sample size (median 9, range 1-93), did not include the youngest age categories (neonates and infants), and were of low reporting quality. Due to the heterogeneous data from different study compounds, dosing schedules, populations, and target tissues, the possibility for comparison of PK data between studies was limited.

CONCLUSION

The influence of growth and development on drug tissue distribution continues to be a knowledge gap, due to the paucity of tissue PK data in children, especially in the younger age categories. Future research in this field should be encouraged as techniques to safely investigate drug tissue disposition in children are available.

Redefining the management of pediatric tonsillopharyngitis with cefprozil

Tonsillopharyngitis is very common in children, with Group A Streptococci being the most common bacterial etiology. Effective antibacterial treatment is imperative due to risk of rheumatic fever. Cephalosporins have been used successfully for the treatment of Group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcal (GABHS) tonsillopharyngitis. Cefprozil is a novel broad-spectrum oral cephalosporin. Cefprozil is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract with high bioavailability. The excellent penetration of cefprozil into tonsillar and adenoidal tissue corresponds well with the clinical outcome. The drug provides excellent coverage against both gram-negative and -positive bacteria that may cause pharyngitis/tonsillitis. The beta-lactamase stability of cefprozil appears to exceed that of other oral cephalosporins for important gram negative pathogens. In clinical trials, cefprozil appears to be at least as effective as commonly used comparison agents such as cefaclor and cefixime. Additionally, cefprozil is better tolerated than the latter, especially with regard to gastrointestinal adverse effects. Thus cefprozil can be considered a safe and reliable drug for the treatment of Streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in children.

Cefprozil: a review

Cefprozil is a novel third generation, broad-spectrum oral cephalosporin with activity against a spectrum of aerobic gram-negative and positive bacteria, as well as certain anaerobes. The beta-lactamase stability of cefprozil may exceed that of other oral cephalosporins for some important pathogens. Cefprozil may be a suitable alternative to several other commonly used beta-lactams and cephalosporins in the treatment of mild to moderate upper and lower respiratory tract infections including sinusitis, otitis media, pharyngitis/tonsillitis, secondary bacterial infection of acute bronchitis, and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, and skin and skin structure infections in children. Available data indicate the safety of cefprozil in both pediatric and adult population.

Analysis of recent antimicrobial agents in human biological fluids by high-performance liquid chromatography

Our previous review on the liquid chromatographic (LC) analysis of anti-bacterial agents was published in 1990 in a special issue of the Journal of Chromatography. Eight years later, some new agents have been registered and numerous other are under clinical experiment. In spite of therapeutic problems encountered with certain bacterial pathogens, the development of novel drug candidates has slowed partially due to the need for identification of new bacterial targets and the cost of the research. The present overview updates the LC methods for the quantitations of recent antimicrobial agents (marketed and in clinical development) in human biological fluids. Consideration has been given to procedures permitting the determination of isomers and metabolites as well as methods regarding tissue extracts or liquid sampled from physiological sanctuaries. LC methods are available for the quantitation of almost all registered or investigated recent anti-infective drugs and some are applicable in routine practice. Nevertheless, few techniques have been validated for the determination in tissue extracts limiting the development of penetration studies.

Optimum treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis

Streptococcal pharyngitis is a common infection in children and adolescents. The great majority of these infections are caused by group A beta-haemolytic streptococci. Although the use of penicillins for group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis has reduced the incidence of rheumatic fever, in the past decade several studies of pharyngitis treatment have reported penicillin failure. It has also been suggested that in comparison with the penicillins the cephalosporins are associated with a lower rate of clinical failure. Cephalosporins have drawbacks in cost, administration frequency or adverse effect profile. Moreover, there is the theoretical risk of cross-antigenicity to cephalosporins in penicillin-allergic patients. Erythromycin is a traditional alternative to penicillins, especially in penicillin-allergic patients, for the treatment of tonsillopharyngitis. However, increased resistance as well as failure rates as high as 24.7% have been reported for erythromycin in the treatment of pharyngitis. Therefore oral penicillins, and alternatively oral cephalosporins, should be considered first-line agents for the treatment of culture-confirmed group A beta-haemolytic streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis. Cephalosporins are useful especially for the treatment of recurrent streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of newer cephalosporins

Several new cephalosporins have been developed in recent years. These agents include several oral and parenteral agents with extended activity against Gram-negative pathogens. The pharmacokinetic literature for these agents is quite extensive; therefore, we have summarised this information and presented it in tabular form for critical comparison. With a few exceptions, the newer cephalosporins share similar pharmacokinetic properties. Cefixime, cefetamet pivoxil and ceftibuten differ from the others in that they exhibit nonlinear pharmacokinetic properties. The nonlinear nature of these agents is reflected by decreasing maximal concentrations with escalating doses of cefixime and cefetamet pivoxil, decreasing area under the serum concentration-time curve with increasing doses for cefixime, and a reduced bioavailability with large doses of ceftibuten. Attention to such characteristics aid the clinician in selecting appropriate dosage regimens that will optimise drug absorption. The majority of agents are primarily renally eliminated; however, renal elimination accounts for only 20% of cefixime elimination. The pharmacokinetic parameters noted for the newer cephalosporins are not influenced by multiple-dose administration, suggesting lack of drug accumulation over time. The pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials should be considered when extrapolating pharmacokinetic information into the clinical arena. In the case of the beta-lactams, the time which drug concentrations remain above some critical threshold, such as the minimal inhibitory concentration, appears to have the greatest influence on bactericidal activity. Therefore, it is important to select dosage regimens that will optimise the time serum concentrations remain above this threshold. We present an evaluation of these agents with respect to their activity against a variety of pathogens in an effort to demonstrate a pharmacokinetically-based process of antimicrobial selection.

Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil versus penicillin, cefaclor and erythromycin in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis and tonsillitis

Cefprozil is a new oral cephalosporin with an enhanced in vitro spectrum of activity that includes group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS). Four multicenter randomized clinical trials were conducted to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of cefprozil administered once or twice a day for the treatment of mild to moderate GABHS tonsillitis and pharyngitis. A total of 1597 patients were enrolled in the trials. Patient demographics and severity of infection were similar for all treatment groups. In Study 1, cefprozil administered at 20 mg/kg once daily was clinically, in 68 of 76 patients (89%) and bacteriologically, in 66 of 74 patients (89%) superior to penicillin -51 of 69 (74%) and 46 of 69 (67%)--administered three times a day in patients of two to 12 years of age. In Study 2, the patients enrolled were 13 years of age and older, and cefprozil administered at 20 mg/kg once a day had similar clinical (93% vs. 90%) and bacteriological (95% vs. 94%) response rates as cefaclor administered three times a day. Study 3 demonstrated that cefprozil administered twice daily was similar to penicillin given three times a day, the clinical satisfactory response being 164 of 175 (94%) for cefprozil and 146 of 165 (88%) for penicillin. In Study 4, identical clinical and bacteriologic responses (95%) were observed for cefprozil administered once a day and erythromycin ethylsuccinate administered four times a day in children over two years of age. There were no significant differences in the incidence or severity of drug-related adverse events, which, when reported, were mild and transient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Review of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetic characteristics, safety, and clinical efficacy of cefprozil, a new oral cephalosporin

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacokinetics, microbiology, clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerance of cefprozil, a new, broad-spectrum oral cephalosporin.

DATA SOURCES

Published clinical trials and microbiologic, pharmacokinetic, and safety data were identified by MEDLINE; additional references were derived from bibliographies of these articles; microbiologic data on file were provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

STUDY SELECTION

Only published comparative clinical trial reports are included in the review of clinical efficacy. Noncomparative clinical data pertaining to uses of cefprozil not approved by the Food and Drug Administration are not included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data are presented on the in vitro microbiologic activity of cefprozil against 10,152 bacterial isolates, including most of the clinically important streptococci (e.g., Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae), beta-lactamase-positive and -negative Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Clostridium difficile, and numerous other gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes. In clinical trials, cefprozil appears to be at least as effective as commonly used comparison agents such as cefaclor, cefixime, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Additionally, cefprozil is better tolerated than the latter two agents, especially with regard to gastrointestinal adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefprozil is a broad-spectrum cephalosporin that provides coverage against both gram-negative and -positive bacteria that may cause otitis media, pharyngitis/tonsillitis, skin and skin-structure infections, secondary bacterial infection of acute bronchitis, and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The beta-lactamase stability of cefprozil appears to exceed that of other oral cephalosporins for some important pathogens. Cefprozil is used primarily for second-line treatment as less-expensive, first-line generic alternatives generally are available. Cefprozil demonstrates clinical advantages over many other orally administered beta-lactam antibiotics in terms of antimicrobial spectrum, a once- or twice-daily dosing regimen, and/or reduced incidence of adverse effects.

Cefprozil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential

Cefprozil is an orally active cephalosporin which has demonstrated activity against a wide range of organisms in vitro. It is particularly active against the Gram-positive organisms Streptococcus pyogenes, pneumoniae and agalactiae and against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus are not susceptible to cefprozil. Cefprozil is also moderately active against Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, many Enterobacteriaceae and certain anaerobic organisms, and is relatively stable to hydrolysis by a number of beta-lactamases. In comparative trials, the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of cefprozil 500mg or 20 mg/kg administered once or twice daily has been comparable with multiple daily dosage regimens of erythromycin in patients with tonsillitis or pharyngitis, with cefaclor and amoxicillin/clavulanate in lower respiratory tract infections, with amoxicillin/clavulanate and erythromycin in skin and skin-structure infections and with cefaclor in acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections. The clinical efficacy of cefprozil is similar to that of cefaclor in patients with tonsillitis or pharyngitis but the bacteriological efficacy of cefprozil is significantly greater than that of cefaclor. Cefprozil is clinically more effective than cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections and demonstrated greater efficacy than cefaclor in one of 2 comparative studies when administered twice daily in patients with skin and skin-structure infections. In children with acute otitis media, cefprozil 15 mg/kg twice daily was as effective as cefaclor or amoxicillin/clavulanate 13.3 mg/kg 3 times daily and was as effective as cefixime 8 mg/kg once daily. The most frequently reported adverse effects associated with cefprozil, diarrhoea and nausea, are usually mild to moderate in severity and discontinuation of treatment is rarely necessary. Thus, cefprozil with its convenient administration regimen appears to be a suitable alternative to cefaclor, cefixime, amoxicillin/clavulanate or erythromycin for the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections, skin and skin-structure infections, and otitis media in children. While cefprozil has shown similar efficacy to cefaclor in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections, well-controlled clinical trials comparing its efficacy with that of cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim+sulfamethoxazole) in this indication are required.