Once-daily aminoglycoside dosing assessed by MIC reversion time with Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Tobramycin disposition in ICU patients receiving a once daily regimen: population approach and dosage simulations

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT? It is well known that tobramycin given as an once daily dose according to the usual recommendations needs therapeutic drug monitoring by measurement of peak and trough concentrations. In the literature, there are only few published studies on the population pharmacokinetics of once daily tobramycin in critically ill patients. Glomerular filtration rate and bodyweight were identified as covariates contributing to the inter-individual variability in the disposition of aminoglycosides. The study, by Peris-Marti et al. [24], only evaluated the pharmacodynamic effectiveness of a 4 mg kg(-1) dose of tobramycin given once daily in critically ill patients. The authors concluded with a simulation showing that for a theoretical MIC of 1 or 2 mg l(-1) , a 7 mg kg(-1) dose was required.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

Our results confirm the high variability of tobramycin disposition in intensive care patients and consequently the possible lack of effectiveness. By using a population pharmacokinetic approach, two explicative covariates (height and Cockcroft creatinine clearance) added to a two-compartment model with proportional error, explained much of the inter-individual variability of tobramycin disposition in the critically ill patient population. In a median ICU patient, simulations were performed at various dosage regimens and peak and AUC pharmacodynamic targets could not be reached simultaneously in more than 45% of the ICU patient population. Drug monitoring is required to manage efficacy and toxicity.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the disposition of tobramycin (TOB) in critically ill patients (ICU) by a population pharmacokinetic approach, to determine the covariates involved, and to simulate tobramycin dosage regimens.

METHODS

Forty-nine adult ICU patients received TOB (5 mg kg(-1) ) once daily. NonMem modelling was performed on 32 patients. The 17 other patients were used for the qualification process by normalized prediction distribution error. Then Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) were performed.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model with a proportional error best fitted the data. TOB total clearance (CL(TOB) ) was significantly correlated with Cockcroft creatinine clearance (COCK) and height. TOB clearance was 4.8 ± 1.9 l h(-1) (range 1.22-8.95), the volume of distribution of the central compartment was 24.7 ± 3.7 l (range 17.34-32.83) and that of the peripheral compartment and the inter-compartmental clearance were 30.6 l and 4.74 l h(-1) , respectively. Only 29% of the patients presented a target AUC between 80 and 125 mg l(-1) h and 61% were lower than 80 mg l(-1)  h. After considering COCK and height, MCS showed that only 50% of the population could achieve the target AUC for the 375 and 400 mg dosages.

CONCLUSION

Even after taking into account COCK and height, for strains with an MIC ≤ 1 mg l(-1) , MCS doses evidenced that peak and AUC pharmacodynamic targets could not be reached simultaneously in more than 45% of the ICU patient population. Combination therapy in addition to drug monitoring are required to manage efficacy and toxicity.

Evaluation of Once Daily Tobramycin Versus the Traditional Three Time Daily for the Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Exacerbations in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Patients

Once daily tobramycin is convenient to use and achieves higher tissue levels that should kill Pseudomonas aeruginosa more rapidly. Small trials of OD compared with TDS aminoglycosides in CF patients have shown no dif-ference in efficacy or toxicity. No one has looked in detail at the impact on sputum microbiology. In a prospective, randomized study at Papworth Hospital, UK, we compared OD with TDS tobramycin, each plus a second anti-pseudomonal, for the treatment of acute infective exacer-bation in 15 adult cystic fibrosis patients colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Using the patients as their own control, the same individuals received the alternate treat-ment regime for the next exacerbation. We aimed to com-pare the clinical and bacteriological efficacy, toxicity>, and the effects on susceptibility of the organism among patients in both treatment groups. Isolates were identified, and the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the antibi-otic in each patient was performed. Patients were assessed for clinical improvement, toxicity and the total viable count in their sputum on days 0\ 7 and 14. In both treatment groups there was a significant clinical improvement, and toxicity did not occur in either group. There was no differ-ence in clinical outcome, adverse events, or time to the next exacerbation. No difference was seen in the selection of antibiotic resistance. OD tobramycin appeared more ef-fective in reducing the number of bacteria in the group overall at day 7 and in two individuals, at day 14.

Pharmacokinetics and renal toxicity of three once-a-day doses of amikacin in cows

Pharmacokinetic variables of amikacin in cows were determined after administration of amikacin sulphate either intravenously (IV) or intramuscularly (IM) at a dose of 25 mg/kg per day for three days. Amikacin concentrations at time zero and maximum serum concentrations were 240.8 microg/mL and 122.53 microg/mL, respectively. The elimination half-life remained unchanged during the three days of administration (T1/2beta = 1.33 +/- 0.029 h for the IV route and T1/2beta = 2.75 +/- 0.38 h for the IM route). Apparent volumes of distribution suggest limited distribution out of the central compartment (VdAUC = 0.154 +/- 0.005 L/kg; Vdc = 36.50 +/- 2.35 L; Vdss = 0.092 +/- 0.004 L/kg). Bioavailability after IM administration was 95%. Serum profiles of urea, creatinine, albumin, electrolytes and pH after 5-day treatment with amikacin at a dose of 25 mg/kg per day IM revealed no changes. Assessment of diffusion of amikacin to milk by a commercially available screening method to detect antibiotic residues revealed that amikacin could not be detected by the fifth milking period after the last treatment. These results suggest that it would be rational to use a large single-daily dose of amikacin for future clinical trials in cows.

Comparison of two gentamicin dosing schedules in very low birth weight infants

BACKGROUND

Several dosing schedules for gentamicin have been recommended for very low birth weight infants during the early neonatal period. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare efficacy and pharmacokinetics of two dosing schedules in preterm neonates.

METHODS

Fifty-eight very low birth weight infants (600 to 1500 g), prescribed gentamicin for treatment of suspected sepsis during the first week after birth, were randomized to receive either the new dosing schedule [every 48 h (q48h)] or the existing dosing schedule [every 24 h (q24h)]. Infants in the "q48h" group received gentamicin at 5.0 or 4.5 mg/kg/dose q48h depending on weight group and infants in the "q24h" group received 2.5 or 3.0 mg/kg/dose q24h. Peak and trough serum gentamicin concentrations were monitored.

RESULTS

Peak serum gentamicin concentrations after the first dose were significantly higher in the q48h infants than in q24h infants (8.19 +/- 1.3 vs. 6.04 +/- 2.2, P = 0.00001). Ninety percent of all peak serum gentamicin concentrations in the q48h group were in a higher therapeutic range of 6 to 12 microg/ml as compared with 55% of q24h (P = 0.0005). None of the q48h infants had subtherapeutic serum gentamicin concentrations immediately after administration of the first dose as compared with 36% of q24h infants (P < 0.005). Eighteen percent of q24h infants continued to have peak serum gentamicin concentrations in subtherapeutic range even after the third dose at 48 h. Trough serum gentamicin concentrations were significantly lower in q48h infants than in q24h infants. However, 9 of 30 (30%) q48h infants had trough serum gentamicin concentrations of < or = 0.5 microg/ml before the dose at 48 h and 4 of the 9 had serum gentamicin concentrations of <1 microg/ml at 24 h after the first dose.

CONCLUSIONS

The q48h dosing schedule of gentamicin given to very low birth weight infants during the first week after birth achieved therapeutic serum gentamicin concentrations and potentially higher peak to MIC ratios for microorganisms in all infants. However, nearly one-third of the infants had extremely low serum gentamicin concentrations before the next dose. A dosing interval of 36 h might be optimal for bactericidal activity and avoid bacterial growth during prolonged periods of extremely low serum gentamicin concentrations; this dosing interval warrants study.

Gentamicin dosing in critically ill patients

Gentamicin is used worldwide in the treatment of serious infections in critically ill patients. The therapeutic efficacy of gentamicin is correlated to the peak serum concentration and the adverse effects to the trough concentrations. Information concerning the pharmacodynamics in critically ill patients is scarce, but pharmacokinetic data are available. A once-daily dosage regimen has replaced multiple dosing of gentamicin in most intensive care units. No studies evaluating the superiority of either of these dosage recommendations in critically ill patients have ever been conducted. Based on 8 meta-analyses performed addressing this issue on a wide range of patients and theoretical considerations, we consider a once-daily dosage regimen feasible in critically ill patients. In septic patients the volume of distribution is significantly increased compared to normal patients, implying that the initial dose should be increased in this patient population. Additionally a general trend towards using higher loading doses (5-7 mg/kg) has been observed in USA, and the appropriateness of this dosing strategy is based on a large descriptive American study. We recommend that the initial dosage of gentamicin in critically ill hyperdynamic septic patients should be 7 mg/kg. Optimal and appropriate monitoring of the treatment with gentamicin in the critically ill patient is still an issue for further investigation. The treatment period with gentamicin should be short (3-5 days), bearing the pharmacological properties of aminoglycosides (small volume of distribution and poor tissue penetration) in mind. In patients with reduced renal function the initial dose of gentamicin should also be increased and maintenance dose reduced preferentially by prolonging the dosing intervals. However, the use of aminoglycosides in a high dose regimen in oliguric or anuric patients or patients who present with a rapidly decreasing renal function needs further consideration.

In vitro characterization of aminoglycoside adaptive resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Aminoglycoside adaptive resistance was characterized in one reference strain and four clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Adaptive resistance was initiated with a 2-h gentamicin or tobramycin exposure at the MIC. Each P. aeruginosa strain demonstrated an adaptive-resistance period of between 8 and 12 h when tested with both aminoglycosides. Aminoglycoside adaptive resistance was shown to correlate with a decrease in [3H] gentamicin accumulation and a small (5%) but significant (P < 0.05) reduction in proton motive force. The mean generation time of P. aeruginosa during peak levels of adaptive resistance (i.e., maximum reductions in aminoglycoside killing) was not significantly different from that of control organisms (P < 0.05). No changes in outer membrane protein or lipopolysaccharide sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis profiles were noted when control, adaptively resistant, and postadaptively resistant cells were compared. Cytoplasmic membrane profiles of adaptively resistant cells, however, demonstrated several band changes when compared with control and postadaptively resistant cells. We conclude that the decrease in aminoglycoside accumulation associated with adaptive resistance in P. aeruginosa may be, in part, a function of reductions in proton motive force and/or cytoplasmic membrane protein changes. However, the importance of these changes requires further investigation.

Alteration of postantibiotic effect during one dosing interval of tobramycin, simulated in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model

The kinetics of the postantibiotic effect (PAE) during one dosing interval of tobramycin against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was investigated. We determined the PAE at different time points during this dosing interval of 12 h in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model simulating human pharmacokinetics in which the half-life of tobramycin was adjusted to 2.4 +/- 0.2 h. Using an enzymatic method to inactivate tobramycin, we determined PAEs in samples extracted from the model at 1, 5, 8, and 12 h, corresponding with tobramycin concentrations of 20, 5, 2, and 1 times the MIC for the test organism. The PAE decreased significantly from 2.5 h at 1 h to 0 h at 12 h. No change in MIC was observed for the strains during the experiments. We conclude that the PAE decreases with decreasing tobramycin concentrations during a 12-h dosing interval and completely disappears after the concentration has reached the MIC for the test organism. On the basis of these observations, the emphasis that is placed on the PAE in discussions about the optimal dosing interval in aminoglycoside therapy is questionable.

Aminoglycoside dosing: one, two or three times a day?

The safety and efficacy of conventional aminoglycoside dosing regimens have been proven in clinical trials. Higher doses at longer intervals may be more effective if they result in higher peak serum levels of the drug, but few trials of "once-a-day" dosing have shown improved clinical outcome. The clinical safety of allowing trough serum levels to fall below the minimum inhibitory concentration is not established. Literal "once-a-day" dosing will result in drug accumulation and toxicity in patients with reduced renal clearance, and in potential lack of efficacy and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant organisms in those with increased renal clearance. However, modified "once-a-day" dosing, with the interval determined by the individual's renal clearance rate (hence avoiding subtherapeutic trough levels), will avoid these problems.

Preclinical and clinical evaluation of once-daily aminoglycoside chemotherapy

The rationale for and effectiveness of extended dosage intervals for aminoglycosides are reviewed. Aminoglycoside antibiotics have a prolonged postantibiotic effect against a variety of common Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms: higher serum aminoglycoside levels are associated with a longer postantibiotic effect and increased bactericidal activity. Moreover once daily aminoglycoside administration may reduce the potential for adaptive postexposure resistance by allowing less contact time between bacteria and antibiotic. A longer dosage interval may decrease the risk of nephro- and ototoxicity. At least 33 published clinical trials suggest that once-daily administration of aminoglycosides and conventional regimens involving shorter dosage intervals are equally effective in patients with normal renal function and Gram-negative infections: besides, once-daily administration may reduce the frequency of aminoglycoside toxicity or delay it.