Biochemical basis for increased susceptibility to Cidofovir of herpes simplex viruses with altered or deficient thymidine kinase activity

Osteonecrosis of the Jaws Associated with Herpes Zoster Infection: A Systematic Review and a Rare Case Report

The investigation's goal was to obtain further knowledge about the connection between Herpes Zoster infection and dentistry therapy for the osteonecrosis of the jaws, combining the review with a case report relevant to the purpose. It is important to study this association because it is a possible additional factor to be considered in the causes of the osteonecrosis of the jaws. We limited our search to English-language papers published between 1 January 2004 and 7 June 2024 in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science that were relevant to our topic. In the search approach, the Boolean keywords "Herpes Zoster AND osteonecros*" were used. Results: This study analyzed 148 papers from Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus, resulting in 95 articles after removing duplicates. Of these, 49 were removed because they were off topic, and 46 were confirmed. This study includes a qualitative analysis of the final 12 articles, removing 34 articles that were off topic. The literature highlights severe oral complications from Herpes Zoster reactivation, emphasizing the need for early diagnosis, comprehensive management, and multidisciplinary care. Treatment strategies include antiviral therapy, pain management, surgical debridement, and antibiotics. Immunocompromised individuals require vigilant monitoring and balanced immunosuppressive therapy. Further research is needed to enhance therapeutic approaches.

Management of oral herpes simplex virus infections: The problem of resistance. A narrative review

Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) type 1 (HSV-1) and type 2 (HSV-2) are among the most common human viral pathogens, affecting several billion people worldwide. Although in healthy patients clinical signs and symptoms of HSV infection are usually mild and self-limiting, HSV-infections in immunocompromised patients are frequently more aggressive, persistent, and even life-threatening. Acyclovir and its derivatives are the gold standard antiviral drugs for the prevention and treatment of HSV infections. Although the development of acyclovir resistance is a rather uncommon condition, it may be associated with serious complications, especially in immunocompromised patients. In this review, we aim to address the problem of drug resistant HSV infection and discuss the available alternative therapeutic interventions. All relative studies concerning alternative treatment modalities of acyclovir resistant HSV infection published in PubMed between 1989 to 2022 were reviewed. Long-term treatment and prophylaxis with antiviral agents predisposes to drug resistance, especially in immunocompromised patients. Cidofovir and foscarnet could serve as alternative treatments in these cases. Although rare, acyclovir resistance may be associated with severe complications. Hopefully, in the future, novel antiviral drugs and vaccines will be available in order to avoid the existing drug resistance.

A Herpes Simplex Virus 1 DNA Polymerase Multidrug Resistance Mutation Identified in a Patient With Immunodeficiency and Confirmed by Gene Editing

BACKGROUND

Herpes simplex virus 1 can cause severe infections in individuals who are immunocompromised. In these patients, emergence of drug resistance mutations causes difficulties in infection management.

METHODS

Seventeen herpes simplex virus 1 isolates were obtained from orofacial/anogenital lesions in a patient with leaky severe combined immunodeficiency over 7 years, before and after stem cell transplantation. Spatial/temporal evolution of drug resistance was characterized genotypically-with Sanger and next-generation sequencing of viral thymidine kinase (TK) and DNA polymerase (DP)-and phenotypically. CRISPR/Cas9 was used to introduce the novel DP Q727R mutation, and dual infection-competition assays were performed to assess viral fitness.

RESULTS

Isolates had identical genetic backgrounds, suggesting that orofacial/anogenital infections derived from the same virus lineage. Eleven isolates proved heterogeneous TK virus populations by next-generation sequencing, undetectable by Sanger sequencing. Thirteen isolates were acyclovir resistant due to TK mutations, and the Q727R isolate additionally exhibited foscarnet/adefovir resistance. Recombinant Q727R mutant virus showed multidrug resistance and increased fitness under antiviral pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow-up of a patient with severe combined immunodeficiency revealed virus evolution and frequent reactivation of wild-type and TK mutant strains, mostly as heterogeneous populations. The DP Q727R resistance phenotype was confirmed with CRISPR/Cas9, a useful tool to validate novel drug resistance mutations.

Heterogeneity and viral replication fitness of HSV-1 clinical isolates with mutations in the thymidine kinase and DNA polymerase

BACKGROUND

Prolonged antiviral therapy in immunocompromised individuals can result in the emergence of (multi)drug-resistant herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) infections, forming a therapeutic challenge.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate spatial and temporal differences in drug resistance of HSV-1 samples from a HSCT recipient and to determine the effect of resistance mutations on viral replication fitness.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five HSV-1 isolates were recovered from a HSCT recipient who suffered from persistent HSV-1 lesions, consecutively treated with aciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir and a combination of ganciclovir and cidofovir. Spatial and temporal differences in HSV-1 drug resistance were evaluated genotypically [Sanger sequencing and next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the viral thymidine kinase (TK) and DNA polymerase (DP)] and phenotypically (plaque reduction assay). Viral replication fitness was determined by dual infection competition assays.

RESULTS

Rapid evolution to aciclovir and foscarnet resistance was observed due to acquisition of TK (A189V and R222H) and DP (L778M and L802F) mutations. Virus isolates showed heterogeneous populations, spatial virus compartmentalization and minor viral variants in three out of five isolates (detectable by NGS but not by Sanger sequencing). Mutations in the TK and DP genes did not alter replication fitness without drug pressure. TK and/or DP mutants influenced replication fitness under antiviral pressure and showed increased fitness under pressure of the drug they showed resistance to.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of NGS and dual infection competition assays revealed rapid evolution of HSV-1 drug resistance in a HSCT recipient with spatial and temporal compartmentalization of viral variants that had altered replication fitness under antiviral pressure.

Diphenyl diselenide and cidofovir present anti-viral activity against Bovine Alphaherpesvirus 2 in vitro and in a sheep model

Bovine alphaherpesvirus 2 (BoHV-2) - the agent of bovine herpetic mamillitis (BHM) - is related to Human alphaherpesviruses 1 and 2 (HHV-1, HHV-2) and, as such, has been proposed as a model for vaccine and drug testing. We herein investigated the anti-viral activity in vitro against BoHV-2 of three anti-herpetic drugs: Cidofovir (CDV), Fanciclovir (FAM), Foscarnet (PFA), and diphenyl disselenide (Ph₂Se₂)_, a compound that has showed activity against HHV-2. Plaque reduction assays (PRA) revealed a significant reduction in viral plaques (p < 0.05) in cells treated with Ph₂Se₂ (79.7% reduction) or CDV (62.8%). FAM treatment resulted in a slight decrease in plaque number (22.9%, p < 0.05); PFA showed no activity. The effects of Ph₂Se₂ and CDV, alone or in combination, were investigated in ewes inoculated with BoHV-2 transdermally and submitted to daily topic treatment. Virus inoculated ewes developed lesions progressing through the stages of hyperemia, large papules or depressed dark areas, followed by scab formation. Treatment with Ph₂Se₂ resulted in reduction in clinical score from day 10 pi onwards (P < 0.05), shortening of clinical course and reduction in duration of virus shedding (P < 0.05) compared to untreated controls. Combined treatment (Ph₂Se₂ + CDV) and CDV alone, also led to clinical improvement (P < 0.05), yet less pronounced and delayed. These results are promising towards the use of Ph₂Se₂, alone or in combination with anti-herpetic drugs, in the treatment of udder and teat lesions produced by BoHV-2 in dairy cows.

Cidofovir, a New Agent with Potent Anti-Herpesvirus Activity

Cidofovir is a potent, broad spectrum antiviral agent with activity in vitro and in vivo against cytomegalovirus and other members of the herpesvirus family, as well as certain other DNA viruses. After uptake into cells it is converted enzymatically to cidofovir diphosphate, a structural analogue of deoxycytidine triphosphate, which selectively inhibits viral DNA polymerases relative to host cell polymerases. Cross-resistance to cidofovir is not usually seen with human cytomegalovirus isolates that are foscarnet-resistant, or isolates that are ganciclovir-resistant due to a deficiency in ganciclovir phosphorylation. Cross-resistance is seen, however, with isolates that are ganciclovir resistant due to polymerase mutations. A prolonged elimination phase seen in vivo, correlates with a long intracellular half-life seen in vitro and allows for efficacy in animal models of virus infection with infrequent dosing or prophylaxis. Clinical studies of intravenous cidofovir in cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS are claimed to show delay of retinitis progression with maintenance doses given once every 2 weeks.

Glycoprotein targeted therapeutics: a new era of anti-herpes simplex virus-1 therapeutics

Herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1) is among the most common human pathogens worldwide. Its entry into host cells is an intricate process that relies heavily on the ability of the viral glycoproteins to bind host cellular proteins and to efficiently mediate fusion of the virus envelope with the cell membrane. Acquisition of HSV-1 results in a lifelong latent infection. Because of the cycles of reactivation from a latent state, much emphasis has been placed on the management of infection through the use of DNA synthesis inhibitors. However, new methods are needed to provide more effective treatment at earlier phases of the viral infection and to prevent the development of drug resistance by the virus. This review outlines the infection process and the common therapeutics currently used against the fundamental stages of HSV-1 replication and fusion. The remainder of this article will focus on a new approach for HSV-1 infection control and management, the concept of glycoprotein-receptor targeting.

New concepts in understanding genital herpes

Herpes simplex virus (HSV)-2 is a lifelong infection that causes recurrent genital ulcers and, rarely, disseminated and visceral disease. HSV-1 infection is an increasingly important cause of genital ulcers. HSV infections are the most common cause of genital ulcers in adults, but acquisition and chronic infection are more commonly asymptomatic than symptomatic. Both the symptomatic and asymptomatic forms of HSV are of clinical consequence for several reasons. HSV-2 infection enhances HIV-1 acquisition and transmission. In addition, sexual and perinatal transmission can occur during asymptomatic viral shedding. Perinatal transmission is of particular concern because neonatal HSV infection results in severe morbidity to the newborn. Antiviral medicines are effective for limiting recurrence duration and decreasing transmission likelihood, although no available intervention completely prevents transmission. This fact highlights the importance of laboratory diagnostics for this lifelong infection, and the need for an HSV vaccine.

Viral infections affecting the skin in organ transplant recipients: epidemiology and current management strategies

Viral skin infections are common findings in organ transplant recipients. The most important etiological agents are the group of human herpesviruses (HHV), human papillomaviruses (HPV), and molluscum contagiosum virus. HHV that are important in this group of patients are herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 and 2, varicella-zoster virus (VZV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), HHV-6 and -7, and HHV-8, which causes Kaposi sarcoma (KS). HSV infections are characterized by their ability to establish latency and then reactivate at a later date. The most common manifestations of HSV infection in organ transplant recipients are mucocutaneous lesions of the oropharynx or genital regions. Treatment is usually with acyclovir, valaciclovir, or famciclovir. Acyclovir resistance may arise although the majority of acyclovir-resistant strains have been isolated from AIDS patients and not organ transplant recipients. In such cases, alternatives such as foscarnet, cidofovir, or trifluridine may have to be considered. VZV causes chickenpox as well as herpes zoster. In organ transplant recipients, recurrent herpes zoster can occur. Acute chickenpox in organ transplant patients should be treated with intravenous acyclovir. CMV infection occurs in 20-60% of all transplant recipients. Cutaneous manifestations, which include nonspecific macular rashes, ulcers, purpuric eruptions, and vesiculobullous lesions, are seen in 10-20% of patients with systemic infection and signify a poor prognosis. The present gold standard for treatment is ganciclovir, but newer drugs such as valganciclovir appear promising. EBV is responsible for some cases of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, which represents the greatest risk of serious EBV disease in transplant recipients. HHV-6 and HHV-7 are two relatively newly discovered viruses and, at present, the body of information concerning these two agents is still fairly limited. KS is caused by HHV-8, which is the most recently discovered lymphotrophic HHV. Iatrogenic KS is seen in solid-organ transplant recipients, with a prevalence of 0.5-5% depending on the patient's country of origin. HPV is ubiquitous, and organ transplant recipients may never totally clear HPV infections, which are the most frequently recurring infections in renal transplant recipients. HPV infection in transplant recipients is important because of its link to the development of certain skin cancers, in particular, squamous cell carcinoma. Regular surveillance, sun avoidance, and patient education are important aspects of the management strategy.

Emerging therapies for herpes viral infections (types 1 – 8)

There are eight members of the herpesviridae family: herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, varicella-zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, human herpes virus-6, human herpes virus-7 and human herpes virus-8. The diseases caused by viruses of the herpesviridae family are treated with and managed by systemic and topical antiviral therapies and immunomodulating drugs. Because these viruses establish a latent state in hosts, antiherpetic agents, such as nucleoside analogues, only control symptoms of disease or prevent outbreaks, and cannot cure the infections. There is a need for treatments that require less frequent dosing, can be taken even when lesions are more advanced than the first signs or symptoms, and can treat resistant strains of the viruses without the toxicities of existing therapies. Immunomodulating agents, such as resiquimod, can act on the viruses indirectly by inducing host production of cytokines, and can thereby reduce recurrences of herpes. The new helicase primase inhibitors, which are the first non-nucleoside antiviral compounds, are being investigated for treatment of HSV disease, including infections resistant to existing therapy.

In vitro selection of drug-resistant varicella-zoster virus (VZV) mutants (OKA strain): differences between acyclovir and penciclovir?

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) mutants were isolated under the pressure of different classes of antiviral compounds: (i) drugs that depend on the viral thymidine kinase (TK) for their activation, i.e. acyclovir (ACV), brivudin (BVDU), penciclovir (PCV) and sorivudine (BVaraU); (ii) drugs that are independent of the viral TK for their activation, i.e. 2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl (PME) derivatives of adenine (PMEA, adefovir) and 2,6-diaminopurine (PMEDAP); and (iii) drugs that do not require any metabolism to inhibit the viral DNA polymerase, i.e. foscarnet (PFA). Drug-resistant virus strains were obtained by serial passage of the OKA strain in human embryonic lung (HEL) fibroblasts and the different drug-resistant mutants were subsequently evaluated for their in vitro susceptibility to a broad range of antiviral drugs. Virus strains emerging under the pressure of ACV, BVDU and BVaraU were cross-resistant to all drugs that depend on the viral TK for activation, but remained susceptible to the acyclic nucleoside phosphonates (i.e. PMEA, PMEDAP and the 3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl derivatives of adenine (HPMPA) and cytosine (HPMPC, cidofovir)) and PFA. In contrast, the virus strains selected under pressure of PCV were resistant to PCV, ACV, PMEA and PFA; but not BVDU, BVaraU, GCV, HPMPC or HPMPA. Similar patterns of drug susceptibility were noted for the virus strains selected under the pressure of PMEA or PFA, pointing to an alteration in the viral DNA polymerase as basis for the resistant phenotype selected by PCV, as well as PMEA and PFA. In contrast, the resistant phenotype selected by ACV as well as BVDU and BVaraU may be attributed primarily to mutations in the viral TK gene. Our data thus indicate that ACV and PCV select in vitro for different drug-resistant VZV phenotypes; whether this is also the situation in vivo remains to be investigated.

Current and potential therapies for the treatment of herpes-virus infections

Human herpesviruses are found worldwide and are among the most frequent causes of viral infections in immunocompetent as well as in immunocompromised patients. During the past decade and a half a better understanding of the replication and disease-causing state of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), varicella zoster virus (VZV), and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) has been achieved due in part to the development of potent antiviral compounds that target these viruses. While some of these antiviral therapies are considered safe and efficacious (acyclovir, penciclovir), some have toxicities associated with them (ganciclovir and foscarnet). In addition, the increased and prolonged use of these compounds in the clinical setting, especially for the treatment of immunocompromised patients, has led to the emergence of viral resistance against most of these drugs. While resistance is not a serious issue for immunocompetent individuals, it is a real concern for immunocompromised patients, especially those with AIDS and the ones that have undergone organ transplantation. All the currently approved treatments target the viral DNA polymerase. It is clear that new drugs that are more efficacious than the present ones, are not toxic, and target a different viral function would be of great use especially for immunocompromised patients. Here, an overview is provided of the diseases caused by the herpesviruses as well as the replication strategy of the better studied members of this family for which treatments are available. We also discuss the various drugs that have been approved for the treatment of some herpesviruses in terms of structure, mechanism of action, and development of resistance. Finally, we present a discussion of viral targets other than the DNA polymerase, for which new antiviral compounds are being considered.

Management of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus

In immunocompetent patients, HSV is controlled rapidly by the human host's immune system, and recurrent lesions are small and short lived. When treated with antiviral agents, these patients rarely develop resistance to these drugs. In contrast immunocompromised patients might not be able to control HSV infection. Thus, frequent and severe reactivations are often seen and might lead to fatal herpetic encephalitis or disseminated HSV infection. Treatment in these patients is limited because immunocompromised hosts often develop severe herpes disease refractory to antiviral drug therapy. It is therefore imperative that physicians develop regimens to deal with both receptive and refractory HSV disease. The following treatment protocol (modified from Balfour and colleagues) might serve as a guide until further investigation of new drugs is performed. In all patients standard oral ACV therapy should be initiated at a dose of 200 mg orally, five times a day for the first 3 to 5 days. Prior to treatment, cultures the lesions should be obtained to verify HSV etiology. If the response is poor, the dose of oral ACV should be increased to 800 mg five times a day. If no response seen after 5 to 7 days, it is unlikely that the lesion will respond to intravenous ACV (or chemically and structurally related drugs such as VCV or famciclovir), so an alternative regimen must be assigned. First, repeat cultures for vital, fungal, and bacterial pathogens must be performed. In addition, ACV susceptibility studies should be ordered, if available. If the mucocutaneous lesion is accessible for topical treatment, TFT (as ophthalmic solution) should be applied to the area three to four times a day until the lesion is completely healed. If the lesion is inaccessible or if the response to TFT is poor, therapy with intravenous foscarnet should be given for 10 days or until complete resolution of the lesions. The dosage of foscarnet should be 40 milligrams per kilogram three times per day or 60 milligrams per kilogram twice daily. If foscarnet fails to achieve clinical clearing, consideration should be given to use of intravenous cidofovir (or application of compounded 1% to 3% topical cidofovir ointment). Vidarabine is reserved for situations in which all of these therapies fail. If lesions reoccur in the same location following clearing, the patient should started on high-dose oral ACV (800 mg, five times daily) or intravenous foscarnet (40 mg/kg tid or 60 mg/kg bid) as soon as possible. When lesions occur in a different location, the patient should be treated initially with standard doses of oral ACV (200 mg, five times daily) and the above protocol should be followed should there be clinical failure. In the future, new treatment options for patients with documented HSV resistance will be important in reducing the clinical impact of HSV.

Topical cidofovir for the treatment of dermatologic conditions: verruca, condyloma, intraepithelial neoplasia, herpes simplex and its potential use in smallpox

Cidofovir is a new antiviral drug that has a broad spectrum of activity against several DNA viruses. Many of the disorders caused by these viruses do not have satisfactory therapy, and given the efficacy of this agent in treating many of these conditions, it holds great promise. It is hoped that ongoing studies will confirm the initial anecdotal reports regarding its therapeutic efficacy and lack of systemic side effects. It is also hoped that the cost to formulate and use cidofovir topically will eventually decrease to a level that will allow more widespread use of this drug.

Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of the thymidine kinase of ACV-resistant HSV-1 derived from an acyclovir-sensitive herpes simplex virus type 1 strain

Twenty-four strains of acyclovir (ACV)-resistant (ACV(r)) herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) were generated from the HSV-1 TAS strain by exposure to ACV, and the genotype and phenotype of the thymidine kinase (TK) from these mutants were analyzed. The TK polypeptide of the ACV(r) HSV-1 strains was examined by Western blot using an anti-HSV-1 TK rabbit serum. The sensitivity of each strain to ACV, foscarnet and cidofovir (CDV) was also determined. A single guanine (G) insertion or a single cytosine (C) deletion was detected in 12 of the 24 ACV(r) strains at the G or C homopolymer stretches within the TK gene. Genotypic analysis predicted that two thirds of the ACV(r) HSV-1 strains expressed truncated TK polypeptides, while one third expressed viral TK polypeptide with a single amino acid substitution at various sites. Western blot abnormalities in the viral TK polypeptides were identified in 21 ACV(r) strains. There was an inverse correlation between the susceptibility of the HSV-1 mutant strains to ACV and that to CDV. Nucleotide sequencing of the TK gene and Western blot analysis of the viral TK polypeptides are considered to be one of the methods for predicting virus sensitivity to ACV and CDV.

Determination of cidofovir in both skin layers and percutaneous penetration samples by HPLC

The aim of this study was to develop a direct, simple and rapid high performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of cidofovir in both skin layers and percutaneous penetration experiments. Samples were chromatographed on a reversed phase encapped column 250 x 4 mm C(8) LiChrospher Select B. The phase mobile consisted on 3% of acetonitrile and 97% of 1.5 mM of tetrabutylammonium dihydrogen phosphate (TADP) and 3.5 mM of disodium hydrogenphosphate adjusted to pH 6. Detection was at 274 nm and the run time was 14 min. The limit of detection was 0.06 microg/ml. The detector response was found to be linear in the concentration range 0.1-10 microg/ml. This assay is a selective, sensitive and reproducible method for the quantification of cidofovir in skin layers and in the receptor compartment of Franz-type diffusion cells after percutaneous studies.

Successful treatment of an aciclovir-resistant herpes simplex type 2 infection with cidofovir in an AIDS patient

Management of the increasing frequency of aciclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections among immunocompromised human immunodeficiency virus-infected people demands additional treatment options. We report the case of a 38-year-old patient with acquired immune deficiency syndrome who suffered from a perianal butterfly ulcer, which was HSV-2 positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. The ulcer appeared during treatment of a cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonitis with ganciclovir. Despite additional valaciclovir therapy the lesion gradually progressed in size. Investigations including histology, PCR analysis and in situ hybridization of a biopsy from the growing ulcer margin confirmed the presence of HSV-2 infection. Importantly, HSV isolates from this specimen were resistant to aciclovir. Based on a report about the successful treatment of aciclovir-resistant HSV infection with cidofovir, our patient received this drug intravenously at a dose of 5 mg kg-1 body weight once weekly for a total of 3 weeks. Concomitant oral probenecid and prehydration were administered to minimize nephrotoxicity. Within 30 days of treatment the ulcer had almost (> 95%) completely healed. We conclude that cidofovir is a potent antiviral drug with a potential usefulness in the treatment of aciclovir-resistant HSV-2 infection. It deserves further investigation in clinical trials.

Herpes simplex virus isolates with reduced adefovir susceptibility selected in vivo by foscarnet therapy

Sequential herpes simplex virus (HSV) isolates from AIDS patients receiving foscarnet therapy were evaluated for susceptibility to adefovir. Foscarnet-resistant isolates with DNA polymerase mutations in regions II, VI, and between I and VII were also associated with an important decrease in susceptibility to adefovir (mean IC50 increase: 4.6-fold compared to pre-foscarnet or wild-type isolates) suggesting that adefovir-resistant HSV could be selected in vivo by foscarnet therapy.

Successful treatment of foscarnet-resistant herpes simplex stomatitis with intravenous cidofovir in a child

A leukemic child developed recurrent herpes simplex virus lesions shortly after receiving a bone marrow transplant and while taking acyclovir. The isolate was resistant to acyclovir and foscarnet in vitro. The lesions responded to a course of cidofovir.

Current and potential therapies for the treatment of herpesvirus infections

Human herpesviruses are found worldwide and are among the most frequent causes of viral infections in immunocompetent as well as in immunocompromised patients. During the past decade and a half a better understanding of the replication and disease causing state of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) has been achieved due in part to the development of potent antiviral compounds that target these viruses. While some of these antiviral therapies are considered safe and efficacious (acyclovir, penciclovir), some have toxicities associated with them (ganciclovir and foscarnet). In addition, the increased and prolonged use of these compounds in the clinical setting, especially for the treatment of immunocompromised patients, has led to the emergence of viral resistance against most of these drugs. While resistance is not a serious issue for immunocompetent individuals, it is a real concern for immunocompromised patients, especially those with AIDS and the ones that have undergone organ transplantation. All the currently approved treatments target the viral DNA polymerase. It is clear that new drugs that are more efficacious than the present ones, are not toxic, and target a different viral function would be of great use especially for immunocompromised patients. Here, we provide an overview of the diseases caused by the herpesviruses as well as the replication strategy of the better studiedmembers of this family for which treatments are available. We also discuss the various drugs that have been approved for the treatment of some herpesviruses in terms of structure, mechanism of action, and development of resistance. Finally, we present a discussion of viral targets other than the DNA polymerase, for which new antiviral compounds are being considered.

Current and potential therapies for the treatment of herpesvirus infections

Human herpesviruses are found worldwide and are among the most frequent causes of viral infections in immunocompetent as well as in immunocompromised patients. During the past decade and a half a better understanding of the replication and disease causing state of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) has been achieved due in part to the development of potent antiviral compounds that target these viruses. While some of these antiviral therapies are considered safe and efficacious (acyclovir, penciclovir), some have toxicities associated with them (ganciclovir and foscarnet). In addition, the increased and prolonged use of these compounds in the clinical setting, especially for the treatment of immunocompromised patients, has led to the emergence of viral resistance against most of these drugs. While resistance is not a serious issue for immunocompetent individuals, it is a real concern for immunocompromised patients, especially those with AIDS and the ones that have undergone organ transplantation. All the currently approved treatments target the viral DNA polymerase. It is clear that new drugs that are more efficacious than the present ones, are not toxic, and target a different viral function would be of great use especially for immunocompromised patients. Here, we provide an overview of the diseases caused by the herpesviruses as well as the replication strategy of the better studied members of this family for which treatments are available. We also discuss the various drugs that have been approved for the treatment of some herpesviruses in terms of structure, mechanism of action, and development of resistance. Finally, we present a discussion of viral targets other than the DNA polymerase, for which new antiviral compounds are being considered.

Current recommendations for the treatment of genital herpes

The incidence of genital herpes continues to increase in epidemic-like fashion. Aciclovir (acyclovir) has been the original gold standard of therapy. The recent addition of famciclovir and valaciclovir as antiherpes drugs has improved convenience as well as the efficacy of treatment. Although aciclovir remains a widely prescribed and reliable drug, its administration schedule falls short of the ease of usage that the newer nucleoside analogues offer, for both episodic and suppressive therapy. Suppression of symptomatic disease and asymptomatic shedding from the genitalia have both become popular approaches, if not the primary targets of antiviral therapy. Knowing that asymptomatic disease leads to most cases of transmission strongly suggests that suppression with antiviral agents could reduce transmission risk in discordant couples. Unfortunately, the role for antivirals in reducing transmission remains to be proven in clinical trials. Neonatal herpes is now successfully treated using aciclovir. Current randomised clinical trials are examining aciclovir and valaciclovir administration, as well as safety and efficacy for post-acute suppressive therapy. Prevention of recurrences in pregnancy is also a topic under investigation, with a view to reducing the medical need for Cesarean section, or alternatively (and far less likely to be accomplished) to protect the neonate. Although resistance is largely limited to the immunocompromised and a change in resistance patterns is not expected, several drugs are available for the treatment of aciclovir-resistant strains of herpes simplex. Foscarnet is the main alternative with proven efficacy in this setting. Unfortunately, administration of foscarnet requires intravenous therapy, although a single anecdote of topical foscarnet efficacy in this setting has been published. Alternatives include cidofovir gel, which is not commercially available but can be formulated locally from the intravenous preparation. Less effective alternatives include trifluridine and interferon. Future possibilities for treatment of genital herpes include a microparticle-based controlled-release formulation of aciclovir and resiquimod (VML-600; R-848). The search for an effective therapeutic vaccine for genital herpes has not been successful to date, although a live virus glycoprotein H-deficient (DISC) vaccine is currently in clinical trials. Recent data suggest that seronegative women are protected (albeit, not fully) by a glycoprotein D recombinant vaccine with adjuvant. Despite the established safety and convenience of current treatment options, better suppressive options and topical treatment options are much needed. Studies using existing agents as potential tools to avoid Cesarean section, or transmission to neonate or partner are ongoing. Both vaccines and antivirals may eventually play a role in prevention of infection.

Resistant herpes simplex virus type 1 infection: an emerging concern after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Fourteen cases of severe acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infection, 7 of which showed resistance to foscarnet, were diagnosed among 196 allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients within a 29-month period. Recipients of unrelated stem cell transplants were at higher risk. All patients received foscarnet; 8 subsequently received cidofovir. Strains were initially foscarnet-resistant in 3 patients and secondarily so in 4 patients. In vitro resistance to acyclovir or foscarnet was associated with clinical failure of these drugs; however, in vitro susceptibility to foscarnet was associated with complete response in only 5 of 7 patients. No strain from any of the 7 patients was resistant in vitro to cidofovir; however, only 3 of 7 patients achieved complete response. Therefore, acyclovir- and/or foscarnet-resistant HSV-1 infections after allogeneic stem cell transplantation have become a concern; current strategies need to be reassessed and new strategies must be evaluated in this setting.

Resistance of herpes simplex virus type 1 against different phosphonylmethoxyalkyl derivatives of purines and pyrimidines due to specific mutations in the viral DNA polymerase gene

Drug-resistant strains of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) were selected under the pressure of (S)-3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl (HPMP) derivatives of cytosine (HPMPC, cidofovir) and adenine (HPMPA) and 2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl (PME) derivatives of adenine (PMEA, adefovir) and 2,6-diaminopurine (PMEDAP). HPMPC-resistant (HPMPC(r)) and HPMPA(r) strains were cross-resistant to one another, but they remained sensitive to foscarnet (PFA), acyclovir (ACV) and the PME derivatives, while the PMEA(r) and PMEDAP(r) strains showed cross-resistance to PFA and ACV. The PMEA(r), PMEDAP(r) and PFA(r) mutants all revealed a single nucleotide change resulting in a Ser-724 to Asn mutation within the conserved region II of the DNA polymerase. Two HPMPA(r) clones and one HPMPC(r) clone possessed single amino acid changes in the DNA polymerase (HPMPA(r) clone D1, Leu-1007 to Met; HPMPA(r) clone B5, Ile-1028 to Thr; HPMPC(r) clone C3, Val-573 to Met). The HPMPC(r) clone A4 contained two mutations, Ala-136 to Thr and Arg-700 to Met. The mutation at position 136, located outside the catalytic domain of the enzyme, was not detected in other HPMPC(r) clones, suggesting that this mutation may not be responsible for the resistant phenotype. Residue 573 is located within the 3'-->5' exonuclease editing domain close to the catalytically important residues Tyr-577 and Asp-581. Similarly, residue 700 is located in the palm subdomain of the catalytic domain, adjacent to the Asp residues 717, 886 and 888 that are vital for polymerase activity. The HPMPA(r) mutations at residues 1007 and 1028, beyond the last conserved region, still fall within the thumb subdomain of the catalytic domain. The different drug-resistant mutants varied in neurovirulent behaviour, the HPMPC(r) strains showing reduced neurovirulence compared with the wild-type.

Topical and intralesional cidofovir: a review of pharmacology and therapeutic effects

BACKGROUND

Cidofovir is a potent nucleoside analog antiviral drug approved for the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in patients with AIDS. It is currently available only for intravenous infusion. Several small studies and case reports describe the successful use of cidofovir applied either topically or intralesionally in several virally induced cutaneous diseases.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to review the usefulness of topical and intralesional cidofovir for the treatment of viral infections caused by human papillomavirus, herpesviruses (including acyclovir-resistant strains), Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, and molluscum contagiosum.

METHODS

We performed a review of recent literature.

RESULTS

Cidofovir is a potent topical intralesional antiviral agent with activity against several DNA viruses that cause cutaneous disease. No significant systemic side effects have been noted, although application site reactions are common and can occasionally be severe.

CONCLUSION

The effective use of topical and intralesional cidofovir for the treatment of diseases of the skin caused by DNA viruses has been demonstrated in a limited number of patients including those infected with HIV. Although larger studies will be necessary to determine the specific function that topical cidofovir will have in the treatment of cutaneous diseases caused by DNA viruses, the drug offers significant promise.

Cidofovir in the treatment of cytomegaloviral disease

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical pharmacology and microbiology of cidofovir in the therapy of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease.

DATA SOURCES

Pertinent literature was identified via a MEDLINE search (October 1986-February 1997), and data from abstracts presented at recent scientific meetings were also included; unpublished information was provided by the manufacturer.

STUDY SELECTION

Antiviral activity data were included if widely accepted methodology was used. All clinical data currently available from human studies were also included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Cidofovir is similar to ganciclovir in mechanism of action; however, cidofovir does not require viral enzymes for activation. Although the half-life of cidofovir in plasma is only 2.6 hours, the intracellular half-life may be much longer, allowing efficacy with biweekly maintenance dosing. In vitro, cidofovir appears to be equally or more effective than the other agents currently available for the treatment of CMV. In vivo, cidofovir appears to be effective in delaying the progression of CMV retinitis, although no clinical trials to date have directly compared cidofovir with either ganciclovir or foscarnet. Current intravenous dose recommendations are 5 mg/kg once weekly for two doses (induction), and then 5 mg/kg once every other week (maintenance). Since cidofovir is cleared almost entirely by the kidneys, dosage adjustments must be made in patients with impaired renal function. Disadvantages of cidofovir primarily include its risks of adverse drug reactions, such as nephrotoxicity, which is likely to occur in up to 50% of patients if appropriate preventative measures are not taken. Neutropenia and constitutional reactions to probenecid are also commonly encountered during the course of cidofovir therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Cidofovir is the first acyclic phosphonate nucleoside antiviral agent to be approved for general use in the US. In addition to delaying the progression of CMV retinitis, cidofovir may provide some protective benefits to patients at risk for developing the disease and may be active against certain strains of virus resistant to other currently available therapies. Another advantage of cidofovir is its infrequent dosage schedule, which may prove beneficial in patients who are not compliant with daily intravenous dosing regimens. When determining the appropriate treatment for a patient with CMV retinitis, the benefits of using cidofovir must be weighed carefully against the risk of potentially serious adverse effects.

Gynecology and family planning care for the woman infected with HIV

This article reviews the interactions between HIV infection and a variety of gynecologic conditions, including lower genital tract neoplasia, pelvic inflammatory disease, menstrual disorders, sexually transmitted diseases, and vaginitis. Important considerations in choosing a family planning method for women infected with HIV-infected women will respond to standard therapy, but require multiple courses of treatment or use of innovative treatment methods. All HIV-infected women deserve careful evaluation for and treatment of gynecologic diseases.

Clinical uses of cidofovir

Cidofovir is a cytidine nucleotide analogue recently licensed as an intravenous treatment for CMV retinitis in AIDS patients. Three controlled clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy of cidofovir for this indication, and have generated data useful as a guideline to prevent potential toxicity. Although de novo emergence of resistance to cidofovir has not been observed clinically in patients receiving cidofovir, cross-resistance to cidofovir in ganciclovir-resistant clinical DNA polymerase mutants has been identified. Cross-resistance of cidofovir and foscarnet has not been identified to date. A broad spectrum agent with in vitro activity against human herpesviruses, adenovirus, HPV, polyomaviruses and human poxviruses, cidofovir is under clinical investigation for a variety of potential applications. Examples include intravenous administration of cidofovir for treatment of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and Kaposi's sarcoma, intraocular injection for treatment of CMV retinitis, intralesional injection for treatment of respiratory papillomatosis, topical application for treatment of molluscum contagiosum, anogenital condyloma acuminata, and recurrent genital herpes, and ophthalmic instillation for treatment of viral keratoconjunctivitis. Copyright 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.