Serum bactericidal activities and comparative pharmacokinetics of meropenem and imipenem-cilastatin

Does Two-Step Infusion Improve the Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Target Attainment of Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients?

The optimal method for administering meropenem remains controversial. This study was conducted to explore the optimal two-step infusion strategy (TIT), and to investigate whether TIT is superior to intermittent infusion therapy (IIT) and prolonged infusion therapy (PIT). A physiologically based pharmacokinetics model for critically ill patients was established and evaluated. The validated model was utilized to evaluate the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target attainment of meropenem. The PK/PD target attainment of different TITs varied greatly, and the total infusion duration and the first-step dose greatly affected these values. The optimal TIT was 0.25 g (30 min) + 0.75 g (150 min) at MICs of ≤2 mg/L, and 0.25 g (45 min) + 0.75 g (255 min) at MICs of 4-8 mg/L. The PK/PD target attainment of optimal TIT, PIT, and IIT were 100 % at MICs of ≤1 mg/L. When MIC increased to 2-8 mg/L, the PK/PD target attainment of optimal TIT was similar to that of PIT and higher than IIT. In conclusion, TIT did not significantly improve the PK/PD target attainment of meropenem compared with PIT. IIT is adequate at MICs of ≤1 mg/L, and PIT may be the optimal meropenem infusion method in critically ill patients with MICs of 2-8 mg/L.

Population-Based Pharmacokinetics and Dose Optimization of Imipenem in Vietnamese Critically-Ill Patients

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to characterize the population-based pharmacokinetic (POP-PK) profile of imipenem in Vietnamese adult patients and to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameter to determine the optimal dose.

Patients and Methods

A POP-PK model of imipenem was developed in patients with severe infection from a 1500-bed general hospital in Vietnam, using MONOLIX 2019. After the initial dose infusion, 6 blood samples per patient were collected to measure plasma imipenem levels. Eight covariates (eg, age, weight) were investigated to ascertain their influence on imipenem’s PK. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine the PTA for the time in which the total steady-state imipenem concentrations remained above the MIC (T>MIC) for 40% and 100% of the dosing interval.

Results

The best fit to the PK data was a two-compartment model with inter-individual variability (IIV) in clearance (CL), central volume of distribution (Vc), intercompartmental clearance (Q), and peripheral volume of distribution (Vp). Only creatinine clearance was retained as a covariate on CL in the final model. The typical value of CL and Vc were estimated to be 4.79 L/h and 11.1 L, respectively. The between-subject variability in this population was noted to be high (>38%, especially for IIV on Q at 110%). Prolonged or continuous infusion demonstrated efficacy (40% T>MIC) against bacteria with a MIC of 4mg/L. To achieve 100% T>MIC or bacteria with MIC>4 mg/L, however, the number of doses must be increased while maintaining the same daily dose for the 3-hour prolonged infusion regimen.

Conclusion

A population pharmacokinetic model of imipenem was developed for Vietnamese adult patients with severe illness. By using Monte Carlo simulation, the appropriate dose has been suggested based on the bacterial MIC value and the targeted PK/PD goal.

Dosing strategies of imipenem in neonates based on pharmacometric modelling and simulation

OBJECTIVES

Imipenem is a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent used in critically ill neonates after failure of first-line treatments. Few studies have described imipenem disposition in this population. The objectives of our study were: (i) to characterize imipenem population pharmacokinetics (PK) in a cohort of neonates; and (ii) to conduct model-based simulations to evaluate the performance of six different dosing regimens aiming at optimizing PK target attainment.

METHODS

A total of 173 plasma samples from 82 neonates were collected over 15 years at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. The majority of study subjects were preterm neonates with a median gestational age (GA) of 27 weeks (range: 24-41), a postnatal age (PNA) of 21 days (2-153) and a body weight (BW) of 1.16 kg (0.5-4.1). PK data were analysed using non-linear mixed-effect modelling (NONMEM).

RESULTS

A one-compartment model best characterized imipenem disposition. Population PK parameters estimates of CL and volume of distribution were 0.21 L/h and 0.73 L, with an interpatient variability (CV%) of 20.1% on CL in a representative neonate (GA 27 weeks, PNA 21 days, BW 1.16 kg, serum creatinine, SCr 46.6 μmol/L). GA and PNA exhibited the greatest impact on PK parameters, followed by SCr. These covariates explained 36% and 15% of interindividual variability in CL, respectively.Simulated regimens using a dose of 20-25 mg/kg every 6-12 h according to postnatal age led to the highest PTA (T>MIC over 100% of time).

CONCLUSIONS

Dosing adjustment according to BW, GA and PNA optimizes imipenem exposure in neonates.

Effects of i.v. push administration on β-lactam pharmacodynamics

PURPOSE

The effects of i.v. push administration on the pharmacodynamic exposures of meropenem, cefepime, and aztreonam were evaluated.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were conducted using previously published pharmacokinetic data for meropenem, cefepime, and aztreonam. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was assessed using Monte Carlo simulations for 30-minute and 5-minute infusions of approved dosing regimens and alternative dosing schemes often used in clinical practice, including 500 mg every 6 hours and 1 g every 8 hours for meropenem, 1 g every 6 hours and 2 g every 8 hours for cefepime, and 2 g every 8 hours for aztreonam. For each regimen examined, means and standard deviations for the percentage of the dosing interval that the free drug concentration remained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were calculated and reported.

RESULTS

No or only minor differences were noted between 30-minute and 5-minute infusions. The largest differences were observed at an MIC of 4 mg/L for meropenem and an MIC of 16 mg/L for aztreonam. At an MIC of 4 mg/L, meropenem 500 mg every 6 hours as a 30-minute infusion had an 8% greater PTA compared with the 5-minute infusion. At an MIC of 16 mg/L, a 30-minute infusion of aztreonam 2 g every 8 hours had a 12% greater PTA compared with the 5-minute infusion.

CONCLUSION

Simulations of meropenem, cefepime, and aztreonam by i.v. push over 5 minutes indicated that there would be minimal or no effect on pharmacodynamic exposures compared with the effect when administered by 30-minute infusions.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Optimization of Imipenem in Children with Hematological Malignancies

Imipenem is widely used for the treatment of children with serious infections. Currently, studies on the pharmacokinetics of imipenem in children with hematological malignancies are lacking. Given the significant impact of disease on pharmacokinetics and increased resistance, we aimed to conduct a population pharmacokinetic study of imipenem and optimize the dosage regimens for this vulnerable population. After children were treated with imipenem-cilastatin (IMP-CS), blood samples were collected from the children and the concentrations of imipenem were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. Then, a population-level pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using NONMEM software. Data were collected from 56 children (age range, 2.03 to 11.82 years) with hematological malignancies to conduct a population pharmacokinetic analysis. In this study, a two-compartment model that followed first-order elimination was found to be the most suitable. The parameters of current weight, age, and creatinine elimination rate were significant covariates that influenced imipenem pharmacokinetics. As a result, 41.4%, 56.1%, and 67.1% of the children reached the pharmacodynamic target (the percentage of the time during the total dosing interval that the free drug concentration remains above the MIC of 70%) against sensitive pathogens with an MIC of 0.5 mg/liter with imipenem at 15, 20, and 25 mg/kg of body weight every 6 h (q6h), respectively. However, only 11.1% of the children achieved the pharmacodynamic target against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with an MIC of 2 mg/liter at a dose of 25 mg/kg q6h. The population pharmacokinetics of imipenem were assessed in children. The current dosage regimens of imipenem result in underdosing against resistant pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii However, for sensitive pathogens, imipenem has an acceptable pharmacodynamic target rate at a dosage of 25 mg/kg q6h. (The study discussed in this paper has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03113344.).

Scaling beta-lactam antimicrobial pharmacokinetics from early life to old age

AIMS

Beta-lactam dose optimization in critical care is a current priority. We aimed to review the pharmacokinetics (PK) of three commonly used beta-lactams (amoxicillin ± clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem) to compare PK parameters reported in critically and noncritically ill neonates, children and adults, and to investigate whether allometric and maturation scaling principles could be applied to describe changes in PK parameters through life.

METHODS

A systematic review of PK studies of the three drugs was undertaken using MEDLINE and EMBASE. PK parameters and summary statistics were extracted and scaled using allometric principles to 70 kg individual for comparison. Pooled data were used to model clearance maturation and decline using a sigmoidal (Hill) function.

RESULTS

A total of 130 papers were identified. Age ranged from 29 weeks to 82 years and weight from 0.9-200 kg. PK parameters from critically ill populations were reported with wider confidence intervals than those in healthy volunteers, indicating greater PK variability in critical illness. The standard allometric size and sigmoidal maturation model adequately described increasing clearance in neonates, and a sigmoidal model was also used to describe decline in older age. Adult weight-adjusted clearance was achieved at approximately 2 years postmenstrual age. Changes in volume of distribution were well described by the standard allometric model, although amoxicillin data suggested a relatively higher volume of distribution in neonates.

CONCLUSIONS

Critical illness is associated with greater PK variability than in healthy volunteers. The maturation models presented will be useful for optimizing beta-lactam dosing, although a prospective, age-inclusive study is warranted for external validation.

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem after intravenous, intramuscular and subcutaneous administration to cats

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to describe the pharmacokinetics and predicted efficacy of meropenem after intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM) and subcutaneous (SC) administration to cats at a single dose of 10 mg/kg.

METHODS

Five adult healthy cats were used. Blood samples were withdrawn at predetermined times over a 12 h period. Meropenem concentrations were determined by microbiological assay. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed with computer software. Initial estimates were determined using the residual method and refitted by non-linear regression. The time that plasma concentrations were greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration (T >MIC) was estimated by applying bibliographic MIC values and meropenem MIC breakpoint.

RESULTS

Maximum plasma concentrations of meropenem were 101.02 µg/ml (Cp(0), IV), 27.21 µg/ml (Cmax, IM) and 15.57 µg/ml (Cmax, SC). Bioavailability was 99.69% (IM) and 96.52 % (SC). Elimination half-lives for the IV, IM and SC administration were 1.35, 2.10 and 2.26 h, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Meropenem, when administered to cats at a dose of 10 mg/kg q12h,, is effective against bacteria with MIC values of 6 μg/ml, 7 μg/ml and 10 μg/ml for IV, IM and SC administration, respectively. However, clinical trials are necessary to confirm clinical efficacy of the proposed dosage regimen.

High target attainment for β-lactam antibiotics in intensive care unit patients when actual minimum inhibitory concentrations are applied

Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk for suboptimal levels of β-lactam antibiotics, possibly leading to poor efficacy. Our aim was to investigate whether the actual minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) compared to the more commonly used arbitrary epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) would affect target attainment in ICU patients on empirical treatment with broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics and to identify risk factors for not reaching target. In a prospective, multicenter study, ICU patients ≥18 years old and treated with piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, or cefotaxime were included. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded. Serum trough antibiotic levels from three consecutive days were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The target was defined as the free trough concentration above the MIC (100% fT_>MIC). MIC_ECOFF was used as the target and, when available, the actual MIC (MIC_ACTUAL) was applied. The median age of the patients was 70 years old, 52% (58/111) were males, and the median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 48.0 mL/min/1.73 m². The rate of patients reaching 100% fT > MIC_ACTUAL was higher (89%, 31/35) compared to the same patients using MIC_ECOFF (60%, p = 0.002). In total, 55% (61/111) reached 100% fT > MIC_ECOFF. Increased renal clearance was independently associated to not reaching 100% fT > MIC_ECOFF. On repeated sampling, >77% of patients had stable serum drug levels around the MIC_ECOFF. Serum concentrations of β-lactam antibiotics vary extensively between ICU patients. The rate of patients not reaching target was markedly lower for the actual MIC than when the arbitrary MIC based on the ECOFF was used, which is important to consider in future studies.

Toward antituberculosis drugs: in silico screening of synthetic compounds against Mycobacterium tuberculosisl,d-transpeptidase 2

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) the main causative agent of tuberculosis, is the main reason why this disease continues to be a global public health threat. It is therefore imperative to find a novel antitubercular drug target that is unique to the structural machinery or is essential to the growth and survival of the bacterium. One such target is the enzyme l,d-transpeptidase 2, also known as Ldt_Mt2, a protein primarily responsible for the catalysis of 3→3 cross-linkages that make up the mycolyl–arabinogalactan–peptidoglycan complex of Mtb. In this study, structure-based pharmacophore screening, molecular docking, and in silico toxicity evaluations were employed in screening compounds from a database of synthetic compounds. Out of the 4.5 million database compounds, 18 structures were identified as high-scoring, high-binding hits with very satisfactory absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity properties. Two out of the 18 compounds were further subjected to in vitro bioactivity assays, with one exhibiting a good inhibitory activity against the Mtb H37Ra strain.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of the β-lactam antibiotics: what is the evidence and which patients should we be using it for?

Traditional antibiotic dosing was not designed for today's escalating antibiotic resistance, lack of novel antibiotics and growing complexity in patient populations. Dosing that ensures optimal antibiotic exposures should be considered essential to increase the likelihood of effective patient treatment. Given the variability in these exposures across different patients, a 'one-dose-fits-all' approach is increasingly problematic. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the β-lactams, the most widely used antibiotic class, is underutilized in certain populations. Clinical experience with β-lactam TDM remains relatively scarce. Patients most likely to benefit from such an intervention include the critically ill, the obese, the elderly and those with cystic fibrosis. Most centres actively performing β-lactam TDM target a minimum 100% of the time during the dosing interval that the free (unbound) concentration of antibiotic exceeds the MIC of the pathogen (100% fT>MIC), which is higher than a traditional target supported by in vitro data. Ideally, isolated pathogens should undergo MIC testing along with TDM on a regular basis, allowing clinicians to address the triad of bug, drug and patient ('mug') in equal measure.

Augmented renal clearance, low β-lactam concentrations and clinical outcomes in the critically ill: an observational prospective cohort study

Whilst augmented renal clearance (ARC) is associated with reduced β-lactam plasma concentrations, its impact on clinical outcomes is unclear. This single-centre prospective, observational, cohort study included non-pregnant, critically ill patients aged 18-60 years with presumed severe infection treated with imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime and with creatinine clearance (CL(Cr)) ≥60 mL/min. Peak, intermediate and trough levels of β-lactams were drawn on Days 1-3 and 5. Concentrations were deemed 'subthreshold' if they did not meet EUCAST-defined non-species-related breakpoints. Primary and secondary endpoints were clinical response 28 days after inclusion, and ARC prevalence (CL(Cr)≥130 mL/min) and subthreshold and undetectable concentrations, respectively. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between ARC, antibiotic concentrations and clinical failure. From 2010 to 2013, 100 patients were enrolled (mean age, 45 years; median CL(Cr) at inclusion, 144.1 mL/min). ARC was present in 64 (64%) of the patients. Most patients received imipenem/cilastatin (54%). Moreover, 86% and 27% of patients had at least one subthreshold or undetectable trough level, respectively. Among imipenem and piperacillin trough levels, 77% and 61% were subthreshold, respectively, but intermediate levels of both antibiotics were largely above threshold. ARC strongly predicted undetectable trough concentrations (OR=3.3, 95% CI 1.11-9.94). A link between ARC and clinical failure (18/98; 18%) was not observed. ARC and subthreshold β-lactam antibiotic concentrations were widespread but were not associated with clinical failure. Larger studies are necessary to determine whether standard dosing regimens in the presence of ARC impact negatively on clinical outcome and antibiotic resistance.

Pharmacodynamic profiling of commonly prescribed antimicrobial drugs against Escherichia coli isolates from urinary tract

Since antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens against current first line agents has affected the management of severe urinary tract infection, we determined the likelihood that antibiotic regimens achieve bactericidal pharmacodynamic exposures using Monte Carlo simulation for five antimicrobials (ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, piperacillin/tazobactam, ertapenem, and meropenem) commonly prescribed as initial empirical treatment of inpatients with severe community acquired urinary tract infections. Minimum inhibitory concentration determination by Etest was performed for 205 Brazilian community urinary tract infection Escherichia coli strains from 2008 to 2012 and 74 E. coli bloodstream strains recovered from a surveillance study. Pharmacodynamic exposure was modeled via a 5000 subject Monte Carlo simulation. All isolates were susceptible to ertapenem and meropenem. Piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin showed 100%, 97.5% and 83.3% susceptibility among outpatient isolates and 98.6%, 75.7% and 64.3% among inpatient isolates, respectively. Against outpatient isolates, all drugs except ciprofloxacin (82.7% in aggressive and 77.6% in conservative scenarios) achieved high cumulative fraction of response: carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam cumulative fraction of responses were close to 100%, and ceftriaxone cumulative fraction of response was 97.5%. Similar results were observed against inpatients isolates for carbapenems (100%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (98.4%), whereas ceftriaxone achieved only 76.9% bactericidal cumulative fraction of response and ciprofloxacin 61.9% (aggressive scenario) and 56.7% (conservative scenario) respectively. Based on this model, standard doses of beta-lactams were predicted to deliver sufficient pharmacodynamic exposure for outpatients. However, ceftriaxone should be avoided for inpatients and ciprofloxacin empirical prescription should be avoided in both inpatients and outpatients with complicated urinary tract infection.

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with severe infections

BACKGROUND

Meropenem is an effective β-lactam antibiotic that is frequently used to treat serious infections in both intensive care unit (ICU) and febrile neutropenic hematology/oncology (Hem/Onc) patients. Studies suggest that to be effective, meropenem concentrations must be maintained above the inhibitory concentrations for the majority of a dosing interval. However, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem seem to differ in critically ill patients compared with healthy or less ill subjects used to select labeled dosing regimens.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to investigate meropenem PK in critically ill patients and to see how often standard dosing regimens produced adequate plasma concentrations. A secondary objective was to investigate how achieved concentrations were related to outcomes (morbidity and mortality) in these patients.

METHODS

Meropenem plasma concentrations over time were measured using a high pressure liquid chromatography assay in febrile Hem/Onc and ICU patients who were treated with standard meropenem dosing schedules. Outcomes such as fever control and survival were assessed in these patients and compared with individual meropenem PK data and with recommended target concentrations.

RESULTS

A total of 25 subjects including 10 febrile Hem/Onc and 15 ICU patients with a variety of serious illnesses and baseline renal function were studied. Mean peak concentrations were less variable than were pre-dose concentrations. Post peak and trough concentrations were often below recommended minimum inhibitory concentrations. Both clearance and volumes of distribution were greater than reported in less ill subjects, only in part explained by increased renal clearance. Therefore, serum concentrations often did not exceed recommended concentration targets even for moderately sensitive organisms. Inadequate concentrations were especially common in the mostly ill, febrile neutropenic Hem/Onc subjects and seemed to explain at least some therapeutic failures. Conversely, drug accumulation occurred in ICU subjects with decreased renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard meropenem dosing regimens were inadequate in many critically ill febrile, neutropenic Hem/Onc, and septic ICU patients. These data suggest a role for meropenem concentration monitoring in such patients.

Efficacy of human-simulated exposures of tomopenem (formerly CS-023) in a murine model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection

Tomopenem (formerly CS-023) is a novel carbapenem with improved activity against diverse hospital pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and has a half-life about twice longer than the half-lives of other carbapenems such as imipenem and meropenem. Our objective in this study was to estimate the efficacy of tomopenem in humans by human-simulated exposures in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model against 9 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa with MICs of 4 to 32 μg/ml and 9 clinical isolates of MRSA with MICs of 4 to 16 μg/ml. Human-simulated dosing regimens in neutropenic mice were designed to approximate the cumulative percentage of a 24-h period that the free drug concentration exceeds the MIC under steady-state pharmacokinetic conditions (f%T(MIC)) observed with tomopenem at 750 and 1,500 mg given as a 0.5-h infusion three times a day (TID) in humans. As reported previously, there was no difference between the target values of P. aeruginosa and MRSA required for efficacy (K. Sugihara et al., Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:5298-5302, 2010). Tomopenem at 750 mg showed bactericidal or bacteriostatic effects against 10 of 11 strains of P. aeruginosa and MRSA with MICs of ≤ 8 μg/ml (f%T(MIC) ≥ 41), and tomopenem at 1,500 mg showed bactericidal effects against 16 of 17 strains of P. aeruginosa and MRSA with MICs of ≤ 16 μg/ml (f%T(MIC) ≥ 43). Meropenem at 1,000 mg TID was tested for comparison purposes and showed bactericidal or bacteriostatic effects against 3 of 4 strains of P. aeruginosa with MICs of ≤ 4 μg/ml (f%T(MIC) ≥ 33). From these results, tomopenem is expected to be effective with an f%T(MIC) of over 40 against P. aeruginosa and MRSA strains with MICs of ≤ 8 μg/ml at doses of 750 mg TID and strains with MICs of ≤ 16 μg/ml at doses of 1,500 mg TID.

Antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury

A common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) is sepsis, which makes appropriate dosing of antibiotics in these patients essential. Drug dosing in critically ill patients with AKI, however, can be complicated. Critical illness and AKI can both substantially alter pharmacokinetic parameters as compared with healthy individuals or patients with end-stage renal disease. Furthermore, drug pharmacokinetic parameters are highly variable within the critically ill population. The volume of distribution of hydrophilic agents can increase as a result of fluid overload and decreased binding of the drug to serum proteins, and antibiotic loading doses must be adjusted upwards to account for these changes. Although renal elimination of drugs is decreased in patients with AKI, residual renal function in conjunction with renal replacement therapies (RRTs) result in enhanced drug clearance, and maintenance doses must reflect this situation. Antibiotic dosing decisions should be individualized to take into account patient-related, RRT-related, and drug-related factors. Efforts must also be made to optimize the attainment of antibiotic pharmacodynamic goals in this population.

In vitro activity of ACH-702, a new isothiazoloquinolone, against Nocardia brasiliensis compared with econazole and the carbapenems imipenem and meropenem alone or in combination with clavulanic acid

The in vitro activities of ACH-702 and other antimicrobials against 30 Nocardia brasiliensis isolates were tested. The MIC(50) (MIC for 50% of the strains tested) and MIC(90) values of ACH-702 were 0.125 and 0.5 microg/ml. The same values for econazole were 2 and 4 microg/ml. The MIC(50) and MIC(90) values of imipenem and meropenem were 64 and >64 microg/ml and 2 and 8 microg/ml, respectively; the addition of clavulanic acid to the carbapenems had no effect.

Disposition, metabolism, and excretion of [14C]doripenem after a single 500-milligram intravenous infusion in healthy men

In this open-label, single-center study, eight healthy men each received a single 500-mg dose of [(14)C]doripenem, containing 50 microCi of [(14)C]doripenem, administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion. The concentrations of unchanged doripenem and its primary metabolite (doripenem-M-1) resulting from beta-lactam ring opening were measured in plasma and urine by a validated liquid chromatography method coupled to a tandem mass spectrometry assay. Total radioactivity was measured in blood, plasma, urine, and feces by liquid scintillation counting. Further metabolite profiling was conducted on urine samples using liquid chromatography coupled to radiochemical detection and high-resolution mass spectrometry. Unchanged doripenem and doripenem-M-1 accounted for means of 80.7% and 12.7% of the area under the plasma total-radioactivity-versus-time curve (area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity) and exhibited elimination half-lives of 1.1 and 2.5 h, respectively. Total clearance of doripenem was 16 liters/h, and renal clearance was 12.5 liters/h. At 7 days after the single dose, 95.3% of total doripenem-related radioactivity was recovered in urine and 0.72% in feces. A total mean of 97.2% of the administered dose was excreted in the urine as unchanged doripenem (78.7% +/- 5.7%) and doripenem-M-1 (18.5% +/- 2.6%). Most of the urinary recovery occurred within 4 h of dosing. Three additional minor metabolites were identified in urine: the glycine and taurine conjugates of doripenem-M-1 and oxidized doripenem-M-1. These results show that doripenem is predominantly eliminated in urine as unchanged drug, with only a fraction metabolized to doripenem-M-1 and other minor metabolites.

Antimicrobial breakpoints for gram-negative aerobic bacteria based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models with Monte Carlo simulation

OBJECTIVES

This study describes a comprehensive programme designed to develop pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) breakpoints for numerous antimicrobial classes against key gram-negative aerobic bacteria.

METHODS

A 10,000 subject Monte Carlo simulation was constructed for 13 antimicrobials (21 dosing regimens). Published pharmacokinetic data and protein binding were varied according to log-normal and uniform distributions. MICs were fixed at single values from 0.03 to 64 mg/L. The PK-PD susceptible breakpoint was defined as the MIC at which the probability of target attainment was > or = 90%. PK-PD, CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints were applied to MICs from the 2005 worldwide Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection database to evaluate the impact of breakpoint discrepancies.

RESULTS

PK-PD breakpoints were within one dilution of the CLSI and European breakpoints for all antimicrobials tested--with a few exceptions. When discrepancies were noted, the PK-PD breakpoint was lower than the CLSI breakpoint [ceftriaxone (0.5 versus 8 mg/L), ertapenem (0.25 versus 2 mg/L), ciprofloxacin (0.125 versus 1 mg/L) and levofloxacin (0.25-0.5 versus 2 mg/L)] and higher than the European breakpoint [ceftazidime (4-8 versus 1 mg/L), aztreonam (4-8 versus 1 mg/L), although ciprofloxacin was an exception to this pattern (0.125 versus 0.5-1 mg/L)]. For Enterobacteriaceae, breakpoint discrepancies resulted in modest (< or = 10%) differences in the percentages susceptible. In contrast, large (> 15%) discrepancies were noted for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii.

CONCLUSIONS

Breakpoint agreement exists for imipenem, meropenem and the aminoglycosides. In contrast, discrepancies exist for piperacillin/tazobactam, cephalosporins, ertapenem, aztreonam and the fluoroquinolones. These discrepancies are most pronounced for P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii.

A comparison of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of liposomes containing meropenem and gentamicin

The antimicrobial activity of eight cationic, two neutral and three anionic liposome compositions containing meropenem and gentamicin was tested in vitro in broth and serum medium. The cationic formulations showed better antibacterial efficacy against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria than the anionic and neutral ones, regardless of the encapsulated drug. The most effective formulations were the cationic PC/DOPE/DOTAP 3:4:3 and PC/Chol/DOTAP 3:4:3, as the MICs with meropenem were 2 to 4 times lower than those of the free drug.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of continuous versus short-term infusion of imipenem-cilastatin in critically ill patients in a randomized, controlled trial

Beta-lactams are regularly administered in intermittent short-term infusions. The percentage of the dosing interval during which free drug concentrations exceed the MIC (fT(>MIC)) is the measure of drug exposure that best correlates with clinical outcome for beta-lactams. Therefore, administration by continuous infusion has gained increasing interest recently. We studied 20 critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia and investigated whether continuous infusion with a reduced total dose, compared to the standard regimen of intermittent short-term infusion, results in a superior probability of target attainment as assessed by the fT(>MIC) value of imipenem. In this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study, patients received either a loading dose of 1 g/1 g imipenem and cilastatin (as a short-term infusion) at time zero, followed by 2 g/2 g imipenem-cilastatin per 24 h as a continuous infusion for 3 days (n = 10), or 1 g/1 g imipenem-cilastatin three times per day as a short-term infusion for 3 days (total daily dose, 3 g/3 g; n = 10). Imipenem concentrations in plasma were determined by using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. A two-compartment open model was employed for population pharmacokinetic modeling. We simulated 10,000 intensive-care-unit patients via Monte Carlo simulations for pharmacodynamic evaluation using the target 40% fT(>MIC). The probability of target attainment by MIC for intermittent infusion was robust (>90%) up to MICs of 1 to 2 mg/liter. The corresponding value for continuous infusion was 2 to 4 mg/liter. Although all 20 patients had an fT(>MIC) of 100%, 3 patients died. Patient survival was best described by employing a sepsis-related organ failure assessment score as a covariate in a logistic regression analysis. Larger clinical trials are warranted for evaluation of continuous infusions at a reduced dose of imipenem for critically ill patients.

Evaluating Empiric Treatment Options for Secondary Peritonitis Using Pharmacodynamic Profiling

BACKGROUND

Selecting an appropriate agent for empiric antibiotic therapy for secondary peritonitis is challenging. The pathogens responsible, aerobic gram-negative bacilli in particular, are becoming more resistant to antibiotics. The purpose of this study was to predict the ability of common antimicrobial regimens to achieve optimal pharmacodynamic exposure against aerobic bacteria implicated in secondary peritonitis, while considering current national resistance trends.

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulation was used to model pharmacodynamic endpoints and compare the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, ertapenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin against isolates of species associated with secondary peritonitis. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions for isolates collected in North America were obtained from the 2004 MYSTIC database. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from the literature; the endpoints evaluated included free drug time above the MIC (fT(>MIC)) and the area under the concentration-time curve to MIC ratio (AUC:MIC).

RESULTS

The simulation predicted that several compounds would have a superior probability of providing appropriate coverage of aerobic bacteria: Imipenem-cilastatin (98.6% CFR at 1 g q8h), meropenem (98.2% CFR at 1 g q8h), ertapenem (91.7% CFR at 1 g q24h), piperacillin/ tazobactam (93.7% CFR at 3.375 g q6h), ceftazidime (91.1% CFR at 2 g q8h), and cefepime (92.9% CFR at 1 g q12h and 95.8% CFR at 2 g q12h). Ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin exhibited CFRs < 82%.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering contemporary susceptibility data for aerobic bacteria, monotherapy with any of the three carbapenems or piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h would provide optimal exposure for the pathogens commonly encountered in secondary peritonitis. Cefepime (in combination with metronidazole to provide anti-anaerobic coverage) also would be an acceptable choice, as would ceftazidime given at 2 g q8h (again in combination with metronidazole). Despite the popularity of combination therapy based on ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or ceftriaxone with metronidazole, these choices appear to be inferior to the other options because of emerging antibiotic resistance, particularly in E. coli.

Clinical pharmacodynamics of meropenem in patients with lower respiratory tract infections

Studies of beta-lactam pharmacodynamics in infected patients are sparse. In this study, classification and regression tree (CART) and logistic regression analyses were used to identify which pharmacodynamic indices and magnitudes were significant predictors of meropenem efficacy for 101 adult patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). Using demographic data, a validated population pharmacokinetic model was employed to predict pharmacokinetic parameters and free serum concentrations in the studied patients. Pharmacodynamic indices [percentage of the dosing interval that free drug concentrations remain above the MIC (% fT > MIC), f(maximum concentration of drug in serum) (fC(max))/MIC, fC(min)/MIC, and f(area under the concentration-time curve) (fAUC)/MIC] were calculated based on the baseline pathogen with the highest drug MIC for each patient. The median (range) of percent fT > MIC, fC(max)/MIC, fC(min)/MIC, and fAUC/MIC were 100% (0 to 100%), 728.8 (0.8 to 15,777), 19.9 (0.01 to 278), and 3,605.4 (2.7 to 60,865.9), respectively. CART identified the following breakpoints as significant predictors for microbiological response: >54% fT > MIC, a fC(max)/MIC > 383, and a fC(min)/MIC > 5; fC(min)/MIC > 5 was the only significant predictor of clinical response. Due to 100% fT > MIC achieved in the majority of LRTI patients, fC(min)/MIC was the statistically significant parameter associated with meropenem clinical and microbiological response in the adults with LRTI. The findings for LRTI patients can be applied to optimize meropenem dose regimens to achieve clinical success and microbiological eradication in clinical practice.

Bactericidal activities of meropenem and ertapenem against extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a neutropenic mouse thigh model

The purpose of this study was to examine the in vivo efficacies of meropenem and ertapenem against extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolates with a wide range of MICs. Human-simulated dosing regimens in mice were designed to approximate the free drug percent time above the MIC (fT>MIC) observed for humans following meropenem at 1 g every 8 h and ertapenem at 1 g every 24 h. An in vivo neutropenic mouse thigh infection model was used to examine the bactericidal effects against 31 clinical ESBL Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates and 2 non-ESBL isolates included for comparison at a standard 10(5) inoculum. Three isolates were examined at a high 10(7) inoculum as well. Meropenem displayed greater in vitro potency, with a median MIC (range) (microg/ml) of 0.125 (0.03 to 32), than did ertapenem, with 0.5 (0.012 to 128). Seven of the 31 ESBL isolates were removed from the efficacy analysis due to their inability to establish infection in the mouse model. When MICs were<or=1.5 microg/ml for ertapenem (<or=0.5 microg/ml for meropenem), similar reductions in CFU (approximately 2-log kill) were observed for both ertapenem (fT>MIC>or=23%) and meropenem (fT>MIC>or=75%). Ertapenem showed bacterial regrowth for seven of eight isolates, with MICs of>or=2 microg/ml (fT>MIC<or=20%), while meropenem displayed antibacterial potency that varied from a static effect to a 1-log bacterial reduction in these isolates (fT>MIC=30 to 65%). At a 10(7) inoculum, both agents eradicated bacteria due to adequate exposures (fT>MIC=20 to 45%). Due to low MICs, no difference in bacterial kill was noted for the majority of ESBL isolates tested. However, for isolates with raised ertapenem MICs of>or=2 microg/ml, meropenem displayed sustained efficacy due to its greater in vitro potency and higher resultant fT>MIC.

The contribution of pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modelling with Monte Carlo simulation to the development of susceptibility breakpoints for Neisseria meningitidis

This study used pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modelling and MICs of 15 antimicrobial agents, derived from testing a large international culture collection, to assist in the development of interpretative criteria, i.e., breakpoints, for Neisseria meningitidis. PK parameters, protein binding, percentage penetration into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and the variability of these values, were extracted from the published literature for the 15 agents. PK-PD parameters have not been developed specifically for N. meningitidis in animal or human studies. Thus, it was necessary to invoke PK-PD targets from other organisms that cause infections at similar sites. The PK-PD targets utilised were: time above the MIC for at least 50% of the dosing interval for all beta-lactams, chloramphenicol, sulphafurazole and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole; an AUC/MIC ratio of >or=25 for the tetracyclines and macrolides; and an AUC/MIC ratio of >or=125 for the fluoroquinolones. A 10 000-subject Monte Carlo simulation was designed with the usual dosing regimens of each antimicrobial agent at MIC values of 0.03-64 mg/L in both serum and CSF. The PK-PD breakpoint was defined as the MIC at which the calculated target attainment was >or=95%. Using these assumptions, the proposed PK-PD breakpoints were: azithromycin, 0.125 mg/L; doxycycline, 0.25 mg/L; cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, 0.5 mg/L; penicillin G, meropenem, rifampicin, tetracycline and minocycline, 1 mg/L; chloramphenicol and sulphafurazole, 2 mg/L; and ampicillin, ceftriaxone and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, 4 mg/L. Proposed PK-PD breakpoints applicable to CSF were: penicillin and cefotaxime, 0.06 mg/L; rifampicin, 0.125 mg/L; ceftriaxone, meropenem and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, 0.25 mg/L; ampicillin, 0.5 mg/L; and chloramphenicol, 1 mg/L.

Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem in febrile neutropenic patients in Korea

Population pharmacokinetic parameters of meropenem in 57 febrile neutropenic patients and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) data for clinically isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli were applied to estimate the time above the MIC (T>MIC) using the Monte Carlo simulation method. Mean population clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V(d)) of meropenem were proportional to creatinine clearance (CL(Cr)) and body weight, respectively: CL (L/h)=9.7 x (CL(Cr)(mL/min)/120); V(d) (L)=14.6 x (body weight (kg)/61). In 1000 simulated patients treated with meropenem 0.5g or 1g every 8h, the proportions of patients who had a T>MIC less than 40% of the dosing interval were 46.3% and 39.5% for P. aeruginosa and 5.8% and 5.6% for E. coli, respectively. The overwhelming resistance of the pathogenic microorganisms, especially P. aeruginosa, in our data compared with that reported in North America suggests the importance of regions or countries as a critical factor for determining the dosage regimen of meropenem in addition to patient characteristics and pharmacokinetics.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meropenem in pediatric patients

Meropenem is a highly potent carbapenem antibiotic against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Meropenem plasma concentration data from 99 pediatric patients (aged 0.08-17.3 years) were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM with exponential interindividual variability and combinational residual error model. A 2-compartment model was found to fit the data best. Creatinine clearance and body weight were the most significant covariates explaining variabilities in meropenem pharmacokinetics among pediatric patients. The validated final model was used to predict meropenem plasma concentrations in 37 pediatric meningitis patients, receiving 40 mg/kg meropenem, who had minimum inhibitory concentration values of the causative pathogens and outcome available. Since the causative pathogens in all patients were eradicated, no break points for required exposure could be found. The microbiological outcomes indicate that the current clinical dosage regimen provides sufficient drug exposure to eradicate the pathogens commonly involved in pediatric meningitis.

Comparison of pharmacodynamic target attainment between healthy subjects and patients for ceftazidime and meropenem

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the pharmacodynamics of two beta-lactams--ceftazidime and meropenem--in healthy subjects versus patients.

DESIGN

Monte Carlo simulation based on published pharmacokinetic studies.

SUBJECTS

One hundred and ninety-seven participants (75 healthy volunteers and 122 patients) from published pharmacokinetic studies of ceftazidime or meropenem.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data on total body clearance and volume of distribution for ceftazidime and meropenem in healthy subjects and patients were obtained from published studies. Monte Carlo simulations were performed based on the pharmacokinetics from each study for ceftazidime 1000 mg every 8 hours and meropenem 1000 mg every 8 hours against isolates of Escherichia coli , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Acinetobacter baumannii , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected from North and South America. We calculated the likelihood of obtaining bactericidal exposures (50% time above the minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] for ceftazidime and 40% time above the MIC for meropenem) for each combination of pharmacokinetic study data and MIC distribution. Linear regression was used to compare target attainments for healthy subjects versus patients. Only three drug-pathogen combinations differed in target attainment between healthy subjects and patients: ceftazidime against P. aeruginosa in North America and meropenem against E. coli and P. aeruginosa in South America. The regression line of target attainment for patients versus healthy subjects had a slope of 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.983-1.093) and a y intercept of -3.73 (95% CI -8.265-0.827, r2 = 0.992). The beta values for slope and intercept did not differ to a statistically significant extent between the regression line and the line of identity (p=0.264).

CONCLUSION

The pharmacodynamic target attainment calculated with healthy subject pharmacokinetic data was predictive of patient target target attainment for ceftazidime and meropenem.

Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobials for the empirical treatment of nosocomial pneumonia: A report from the OPTAMA Program

OBJECTIVE

To compare the probability of achieving specific pharmacodynamic exposures of commonly used intravenous antibiotics for the empirical treatment of nosocomial pneumonia against those pathogens most commonly implicated in the disease.

DESIGN

Ten thousand-subject Monte Carlo simulation.

SETTING

Research center.

SUBJECT

None.

INTERVENTIONS

Pharmacodynamic analysis was conducted for the following antimicrobials at standard doses: meropenem, imipenem-cilastatin, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and ciprofloxacin. Prevalence of causative pathogens was based on the 2000 SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Study, and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were obtained using the 2003 US MYSTIC database. The probabilities of each drug and dosing regimen in achieving pharmacodynamic targets were calculated. Bactericidal targets were defined as 40% T>MIC for the carbapenems, 50% T>MIC for other beta-lactams, and an area under the curve (AUC)/MIC ratio of 125 for ciprofloxacin. A sensitivity analysis was performed using two alternate models to determine the impact of varying pathogen prevalence on target attainment.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Meropenem and imipenem provided high probabilities of achieving their bactericidal target of 40% T>MIC, with target attainments of 98% for all regimens. At the bactericidal end point of 50% T>MIC, cefepime 2 g every 8 hrs displayed the highest target attainment at 99.9%, followed by cefepime 2 g every 12 hrs, ceftazidime 2 g every 8 hrs, piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g every 6 hrs and 3.375 g every 6 hrs, cefepime 1 g every 12 hrs, and ceftazidime 1 g every 8 hrs with target attainments of 95.0%, 92.5%, 92.3%, 91.3%, 90.3%, and 67.9%, respectively. Ciprofloxacin presented the lowest probability of achieving its bactericidal target of an AUC/MIC ratio of 125, with target attainments of 54.7% and 12.0% when given as 400 mg every 8 hrs and 400 mg every 12 hrs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Meropenem, imipenem, cefepime, ceftazidime (2 g every 8 hrs), and piperacillin/tazobactam have high probabilities of achieving adequate pharmacodynamic exposures when given for the empirical treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in the absence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Ceftazidime 1g every 8 hrs and ciprofloxacin produce low target attainment rates and will not likely result in high clinical success rates when given as monotherapy.

Pharmacodynamic Modeling of β-lactam Antibiotics for the Empiric Treatment of Secondary Peritonitis: A Report from the OPTAMA Program

BACKGROUND

In this report of the OPTAMA (Optimizing Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment using the MYSTIC Antibiogram) program, we utilized Monte Carlo simulation to compare the probabilities of achieving bactericidal time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (%T > MIC) exposures for imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg q6h and 1000 mg q8h, meropenem 500 mg q6h and 1000 mg q8h and piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h and 4.5 g q8h in the empiric treatment of secondary peritonitis.

METHODS

The prevalence of pathogens causing secondary peritonitis was identified from the primary surgical and infectious diseases literature. Data for these pathogens with respect to MIC were obtained from the 2003 MYSTIC surveillance study and weighted by the prevalence of each pathogen. A sensitivity analysis varying the prevalence of P. aeruginosa was performed with two additional models to determine the robustness of the data. Pharmacokinetic parameters, obtained from previously published studies in healthy volunteers were used to simulate the %T > MIC for 10,000 patients receiving imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam. The likelihood of obtaining bactericidal exposure is reported.

RESULTS

Empiric utilization of imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem 500 mg q6h and 1000 mg q8h regimens achieved 99.6%-99.7% likelihood of bactericidal exposure. Piperacillin/ tazobactam 3.375 g q6h and 4.5 g q8h produced bactericidal target attainments of 92.9% and 85.2%, respectively. Models simulating higher prevalence of P. aeruginosa reduced the likelihood of bactericidal exposure for piperacillin/tazobactam regimens significantly and had little effect on the carbapenems.

CONCLUSION

All of the beta-lactams used in the current analysis were predicted to achieve high target attainment consistently for the empiric treatment of secondary peritonitis. However, imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg q6h and 1000 mg q8h, meropenem 1000 mg q8h and 500 mg q6h, and piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h achieved the highest likelihood. These, in particular, would be effective choices for the empiric treatment of secondary peritonitis.

Derivation of Meropenem Dosage in Patients Receiving Continuous Veno-Venous Hemofiltration Based on Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment

BACKGROUND

Dosage recommendations for antibiotics in patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) should be based on pharmacodynamic requirements. For meropenem, this would be achieving appropriate time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC). We employed Monte Carlo simulation to calculate the bactericidal target attainment for various dosing regimens of meropenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species.

METHODS

Target attainment at 40% T > MIC was calculated for 5,000 simulated subjects receiving meropenem 1,000 mg every 12 and 8 h, and 500 mg every 12, 8 and 6 h. Pharmacokinetics were extrapolated from primary literature sources utilizing similar methods of CVVH. MIC data for P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species were derived from the US 2003 MYSTIC study. Target attainment at the breakpoint of 4 microg/ml was also calculated.

RESULTS

Only regimens of 1,000 mg every 8 h and 500 mg every 6 h essentially achieve 100% target attainment at the breakpoint. However, due to higher peak concentrations, 1,000 mg every 8 h is able to attain improved target attainment against more resistant populations of P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species, thus providing the greatest probability of bactericidal exposure.

CONCLUSION

Meropenem 1,000 mg every 8 h optimizes the pharmacodynamic profile in patients undergoing CVVH. Lower doses or increased dosing intervals should not be advocated for inpatients receiving this renal replacement technique. .

Evaluation by monte carlo simulation of the pharmacokinetics of two doses of meropenem administered intermittently or as a continuous infusion in healthy volunteers

Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibacterial agent. In order to optimize levels in plasma relative to the MICs, the ideal dose level and dosage regimen need to be determined. The pharmacokinetics of meropenem were studied in two groups, each comprising eight healthy volunteers who received the following doses: 500 mg as an intravenous infusion over 30 min three times a day (t.i.d.) versus a 250-mg loading dose followed by a 1,500 mg continuous infusion over 24 h for group A and 1,000 mg as an intravenous infusion over 30 min t.i.d. versus a 500-mg loading dose followed by a 3,000-mg continuous infusion over 24 h for group B. Meropenem concentrations in plasma and urine were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection, respectively. Pharmacokinetic calculations were done by use of a two-compartment open model, and the data were extrapolated by Monte Carlo simulations for 10,000 simulated subjects for pharmacodynamic evaluation. There were no significant differences in total clearance and renal clearance between group A and group B or between the intermittent treatment and the continuous infusion. The analyses of the probability of target attainment by MIC for the high- and low-dose continuous infusions were robust up to MICs of 4 mg/liter and 2 mg/liter, respectively. The corresponding values for intermittent infusions were only 0.5 mg/liter and 0.25 mg/liter. When these observations were correlated with MICs obtained from the MYSTIC database, intermittent infusion results in adequate activity against two of the most common nosocomially acquired pathogens, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae. However, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the evaluation shows a clear advantage of high-dose therapy administered as a continuous infusion. We believe that in the empirical therapy situation, the continuous-infusion mode of administration is most worth the extra efforts. We conclude that clinical trials for evaluation of the continuous infusions of meropenem in critically ill patients are warranted.

Simulation of Antibiotic Pharmacodynamic Exposure for the Empiric Treatment of Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections: A Report from the OPTAMA Program

OBJECTIVE

We developed a model to predict the pharmacodynamic exposure of antibiotics against bacteria commonly implicated in nosocomial bloodstream infections to determine which dosage regimens would provide the greatest likelihood of obtaining a bactericidal effect.

METHODS

Pharmacodynamic exposures were simulated for 5000 subjects receiving standard doses of ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, imipenem, or ciprofloxacin. Exposures were indexed to the MICs of bacteria weighted by their prevalence in causing nosocomial bloodstream infections, derived from 2002 SENTRY data. Enterococci were excluded. MIC data were derived from the 2003 Meropenem Yearly Surveillance Test Information Collection resistance study. The probabilities of achieving bactericidal exposures (ie, target attainment) for each antibiotic regimen were compared. The effect of increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on attainment of bactericidal targets was tested.

RESULTS

All dosage regimens except ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime 1 g q8h achieved >90% likelihood of bactericidal exposure. The rank order of target attainment was as follows: imipenem 500 mg q6h, 100.0%; imipenem 1 g q8h, 99.9%; cefepime 2 g q12h, 99.4%; meropenem 1 g q8h, 98.4%; cefepime 1 g q12h, 98.2%; piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h, 97.9%; piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 gq8h, 95.0%; ceftazidime 2 g q8h, 94.2%; ceftazidime 1 g q8h, 71.7%; ciprofloxacin 400 mg q8h, 63.3%; and ciprofloxacin 400 mg q12h,63.0%. Target attainments dropped to <90% for all agents when MRSA was modeled at > or =10% prevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this model analysis suggest that standard doses of the carbapenems, piperacillin/tazobactam, and cefepime, and higher doses of ceftazidime, may provide optimal likelihood of achieving bactericidal exposure against pathogens implicated in nosocomial bloodstream infections, excluding MRSA and enterococci. When MRSA rates are > or =10%, therapy with an antibiotic that has activity against this phenotype should be empirically initiated.

Activity of three β-lactams (ertapenem, meropenem and ampicillin) against intraphagocytic Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus

OBJECTIVES

Assessment of the activity of three beta-lactams [ertapenem (a carbapenem with a prolonged half-life), meropenem and ampicillin] against intraphagocytic Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus.

METHODS

Quantitative measurements of cfu changes in broth and in THP-1 macrophages (post-phagocytosis) over time (5 and 24 h) at concentrations spanning from sub-MICs to C(max) (maximal concentration typically observed in patients' serum upon administration of conventional doses); morphological studies using an electron microscope; evaluation of drug stability (HPLC), protein binding (equilibrium dialysis) and measurement of drug cellular accumulation (microbiological assay).

RESULTS

Ertapenem was unable to control L. monocytogenes growth in THP-1 macrophages at all concentrations and times tested, even under conditions where ampicillin and meropenem were bactericidal. This behaviour could not be ascribed to drug instability, protein binding or lack of cell accumulation in comparison with ampicillin or meropenem. Ertapenem, ampicillin and meropenem were equally effective at reducing the post-phagocytosis inoculum of S. aureus ( approximately 1 log cfu), and caused conspicuous changes in the morphology of intracellular bacteria consistent with their lysis. These effects were obtained, however, only at large multiples (100-fold or more) of the MIC maintained over 24 h. Because of the high intrinsic antimicrobial potency of the beta-lactams studied, these concentrations were below the C(max).

CONCLUSIONS

Ertapenem will probably be ineffective against intraphagocytic forms of L. monocytogenes for reasons that remain to be discovered. Conversely, ertapenem could be an alternative to ampicillin and meropenem against intraphagocytic S. aureus since its longer half-life may allow high concentrations to be maintained for more prolonged times.

The OPTAMA programme: utilizing MYSTIC (2002) to predict critical pharmacodynamic target attainment against nosocomial pathogens in Europe

OBJECTIVES

The Optimising Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment using the MYSTIC (Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection) Antibiogram (OPTAMA) programme identifies antibiotic regimens with the highest probability of attaining critical pharmacodynamic targets, accounting for the inherent variability in pharmacokinetics, dosages and MIC distributions.

METHODS

European MIC data were obtained from the MYSTIC programme. Pharmacodynamic target attainment was calculated by Monte Carlo simulation for meropenem, imipenem, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam and ciprofloxacin against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

RESULTS

Significant differences in probability of target attainment were found, with Northern Europe demonstrating the highest probabilities of target attainment and Eastern Europe the lowest. The carbapenems had the highest target attainments and susceptibility levels across all regions and pathogens. The cephalosporins demonstrated high target attainments and susceptibility results against E. coli and K. pneumoniae in Northern and Southern Europe. Piperacillin/tazobactam and ciprofloxacin had the lowest levels for both parameters in all regions. Desirable target attainment was not achieved (except for carbapenems in Northern Europe) for A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa; thus, combination therapy may be appropriate empirical therapy for these pathogens in Southern and Eastern Europe. The closest correlations between target attainment and susceptibility were for meropenem 1 g every 8 h, imipenem 0.5 g every 6 h and ceftazidime 1 g every 8 h.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlighted significant overestimations between the probability of target attainment and the reported percentage susceptibility, particularly for piperacillin/tazobactam and ciprofloxacin. The approach of the OPTAMA programme provides a novel tool which complements susceptibility data to help in the selection of appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy.

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Meropenem and Imipenem in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of imipenem and meropenem in a population of critically ill patients with sepsis to find possible differences that may help in selecting the most appropriate drug and/or dosage in order to optimise empiric antimicrobial therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-centre, randomised, nonblind study of the pharmacokinetics of both intravenous imipenem 1g and meropenem 1g in 20 patients admitted to an intensive care unit with sepsis in whom antimicrobial therapy was indicated on clinical grounds. Patients were divided into two groups: group I received intravenous imipenem 1g plus cilastatin 1g, and group II received intravenous meropenem 1g over 30 minutes. Peripheral blood samples were collected at 0, 0.5 (end of infusion), 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 hours after the first dose and were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 4 masculineC. Urine samples were collected during the 8 hours after antimicrobial administration at 2-hour intervals: 0-2, 2-4, 4-6 and 6-8 hours. The total volume of urine was recorded; the serum and urine samples were immediately frozen and stored at -80 masculineC until assayed. Pharmacokinetic analysis was carried out through computerised programs using the least-square regression method and a two-compartment open model. Statistical differences were evaluated by means of one-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

The following pharmacokinetic differences between the two drugs were observed: the imipenem mean peak serum concentration was significantly higher than for meropenem (90.1 +/- 50.9 vs 46.6 +/- 14.6 mg/L, p < 0.01); the area under the serum concentration-time curve was significantly higher for imipenem than for meropenem (216.5 +/- 86.3 vs 99.5 +/- 23.9 mg . h/L, p < 0.01), while the mean volume of distribution and mean total clearance were significantly higher for meropenem than for imipenem (25 +/- 4.1 vs 17.4 +/- 4.5L, p < 0.01 and 191 +/- 52.2 vs 116.4 +/- 42.3 mL/min, p < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The more favourable pharmacokinetic profile of imipenem compared with meropenem in critically ill patients with sepsis might balance the possibly greater potency demonstrated in vitro for meropenem against Gram-negative strains. Hence, the clinical efficacy of the two carbapenems depends mostly on their correct dosage.

Pharmacodynamic modeling of carbapenems andfluoroquinolones against bacteria that produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamases

BACKGROUND

Bacteria that produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) are resistant to penicillins,cephalosporins, and monobactams. The results of clinical studies suggest that the carbapenems imipenem and meropenem may be effective against bacteria that produce ESBLs, although it is not known whether the new once-daily carbapenem ertapenem or the fluoroquinolones are useful against infections caused by ESBL-producing bacteria.

OBJECTIVE

The present study compared the simulated pharmacodynamics of the carbapenems imipenem,meropenem, and ertapenem; the simulated pharmacodynamics of the fluoroquinolones levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and ciprofloxacin with those of the carbapenems; and the simulated pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin 750 mg with those of levofloxacin 500 mg, all against gram-negative isolates that did and did not produce ESBLs

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from studies in healthy humans. Minimum inhibitory concentrationsMICs) for bacteria that did and did not produce ESBLs were determined in triplicate using broth-microdilution techniques as recommended by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines. Monte Carlo simulation was used to construct pharmacodynamic models for imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Pharmacodynamic measures of interest were the probability of the free concentration remaining above the MIC >-40% of the time (T>MIC > or =40%) for carbapenems and the likelihood of achieving a free AUC:MIC ratio > or =125 for fluoroquinolones.

RESULTS

MICs were determined for 39 isolates that produced ESBLs and 45 isolates that did not Bacteria that did not produce ESBLs were > or =93% susceptible to all carbapenems and fluoroquinolones tested. Among bacteria that produced ESBLs, rates of susceptibility to the specific agents were as follows: imipenem, 100%; meropenem, 97%; ertapenem, 87%; levofloxacin, 54%; gatifloxacin, 44%; and ciprofloxacin, 36%. In the pharmacodynamic models, imipenem and meropenem had an equal likelihood of achieving a free T>MIC > or =40% against bacteria that produced ESBLs (> or =97%) and bacteria that did not produce ESBLs (> or =98%). In contrast, the likelihood of ertapenem achieving a free T>MIC > or =40% was lower against bacteria that produced ESBLs (78%) than against bacteria that did not produce ESBLs (94%). Similarly, the fluoroquinolones were less likely to achieve a free AUC:MIC ratio > or =125 against bacteria that produced ESBLs (2%-13%) than against bacteria that did not produce ESBLs (85%-91%).

CONCLUSIONS

Carbapenems had superior in vitro activity against bacteria that produced ESBLs compared with fluoroquinolones. Pharmacodynamic modeling based on local ESBL-producing isolates and pharmacokinetic data from healthy humans indicated that imipenem and meropenem may have a greater likelihood of achieving pharmacodynamic targets against bacteria that produce ESBLs than ertapenem or fluoroquinolones.

Optimizing pharmacodynamic target attainment using the MYSTIC antibiogram: data collected in North America in 2002

The OPTAMA Program is intended to examine typical antimicrobial regimens used in the treatment of common nosocomial pathogens and the likelihood of these regimens attaining appropriate pharmacodynamic exposure in different parts of the world. A 5,000-subject Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate pharmacodynamic target attainment for meropenem, imipenem, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ciprofloxacin against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Standard dosing regimens from North America were used. Pharmacokinetic parameter variability was derived from existing healthy volunteer data, and MIC data came from the 2002 MYSTIC Program. Ciprofloxacin displayed the lowest target attainment against all bacterial species (41 to 46% for A. baumannii, 53 to 59% for P. aeruginosa, and 80 to 85% for the Enterobacteriaceae). Increasing the dose to 400 mg every 8 h did not significantly increase target attainment against nonfermenters. Piperacillin-tazobactam target attainments were similar to that of ceftazidime against all pathogens. Higher doses of both compounds were needed to achieve better target attainments against P. aeruginosa. Overall, meropenem, imipenem, and cefepime attained the highest probabilities of attainment against the Enterobacteriaceae (99 to 100%). The carbapenems appear to be the most useful agents against A. baumannii (88 to 92%), and these agents, along with higher doses of any of the beta-lactams, would be the most appropriate choices for empirical therapy for P. aeruginosa infection. Given the lack of agreement between percent susceptibility and probability of target attainment for certain antimicrobial regimens, a methodology employing stochastic pharmacodynamic analyses may be a more useful tool for differentiating the most-optimal compounds and dosing regimens in the clinical setting of initial empirical therapy.

Pharmacodynamic comparisons of antimicrobials against nosocomial isolates of escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumoniae, acinetobacter baumannii and pseudomonas aeruginosa from the MYSTIC surveillance program: the OPTAMA Program, South America 2002

The OPTAMA (Optimizing Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment using the MYSTIC [Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection] Antibiogram) Program provides insight into the appropriate antibiotic options for empiric therapy for common nosocomial pathogens. In this report, South America is represented by Brazil, Colombia, Peru, and Venezuela. A 5000-subject Monte Carlo Simulation estimated pharmacodynamic target attainment for meropenem, imipenem, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and ciprofloxacin against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pharmacokinetic parameter variability was derived from existing healthy volunteer data, and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data came from the 2002 MYSTIC program. Piperacillin/tazobactam and ciprofloxacin displayed the lowest target attainment against all bacterial species (14% to 24% for A. baumannii, 26% to 37% for P. aeruginosa, and 48% to 66% for the Enterobacteriaceae). Overall, the carbapenems had the highest probabilities of attainment against the Enterobacteriaceae (98% to 100%) and A. baumannii (73% to 74%), whereas cefepime obtained the greatest target attainment against P. aeruginosa (65%). Because no single regimen had high target attainment against A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa, the use of combination therapy to treat these pathogens in South America may be justified. Because of the lack of agreement with percent susceptibility for certain antimicrobial regimens, the use of pharmacodynamic target attainment may be a more accurate predictor of microbiologic success.

Use of Monte Carlo simulation to design an optimized pharmacodynamic dosing strategy for meropenem

Prolonging the infusion of meropenem over 3 hours increases the percentage of the dosing interval that drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), thereby maximizing the pharmacodynamics of this agent and adhering to drug stability constraints. Monte Carlo simulation was employed to determine pharmacodynamic target attainment rates for several prolonged infusion (PI) meropenem dosage regimens as compared with the traditional 30-minute infusion (TI) against Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter species, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations. Percent time above the MIC (%T>MIC) exposures for 1000 mg TI q8h, 2000 mg TI q8h, 500 mg PI q8h, 1000 mg PI q12h, 1000 mg PI q8h, 2000 mg PI q12h, and 2000 mg PI q8h were simulated for 10,000 subjects. Variability in pharmacokinetic parameters and MIC distributions were derived from studies in healthy volunteers and the MYSTIC surveillance program, respectively. The probabilities of attaining bacteriostatic (30% T>MIC) and bactericidal (50% T>MIC) exposures were high for all dosage regimens against populations of Enterobacteriaceae. Against Acinetobacter species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the 2000-mg PI q8h dosage regimen provided the highest target attainment rates. For mild to moderate infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae, prolonged infusion regimens of 500 mg PI q8h and 1000 mg PI q12h would provide equivalent target attainment rates to the traditional 30-minute infusion while requiring less drug over 24 hours. For more serious infections presumably caused by Acinetobacter species or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a dose of 2000 mg PI q8h is recommended because of its high bactericidal target attainment rate against these pathogens. Further study of these dosage recommendations in clinical trials is suggested.

Pharmacodynamics of Meropenem and Imipenem Against Enterobacteriaceae,Acinetobacter baumannii, andPseudomonas aeruginosa

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the pharmacodynamics of meropenem and imipenem, both administered as 500 mg every 6 hours, against populations of Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

DESIGN

Ten thousand-subject Monte Carlo simulation.

INTERVENTION

Variability in total body clearance (ClT), volume of distribution as calculated by the terminal elimination rate (Vdbeta), and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa) were derived from the literature for both meropenem and imipenem. For the free drug concentrations, the percentage of the dosing interval that the drug concentrations remain above the MIC (%T>MIC) for each carbapenem-bacteria combination was calculated for 10,000 iterations, substituting a different ClT, Vdbeta, fraction of unbound drug, and MIC into the equation each time based on the probability distribution for each parameter. Probabilities of attaining targets of 30%, 50%, and 100% T>MIC were calculated.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Meropenem free drug %T>MIC exposure was significantly greater than that of imipenem against Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa, whereas imipenem exposure was greater for A. baumannii. For both agents, free drug %T>MIC exposure was greatest against Enterobacteriaceae and less for A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa. Probabilities of target attainment for 30% and 50% T>MIC were similar between drugs for most bacteria. At 100% T>MIC, meropenem target attainments were greater than those of imipenem against Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa, and imipenem attainment was higher for A. baumannii.

CONCLUSION

The probability of attaining lower pharmacodynamic targets for most gram-negative bacteria is similar for these carbapenems; however, differences become apparent as the pharmacodynamic requirement increases. Further study of the benefits of achieving this pharmacodynamic breakpoint with a higher probability of attaining targets is necessary.