Population pharmacokinetic study of isepamicin with intensive care unit patients

Single-dose and Steady-state Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to Medical Intensive Care Unit of India

Rationale

Vancomycin remains the standard of care for gram-positive bacterial infections, though there are significant developments in newer antibacterial agents. Efficacy can be improved by linking pharmacokinetic with pharmacodynamic principles, thus leading to optimum antibiotic exposure. There is scarcity of pharmacokinetic data in Indian intensive care unit (ICU) population.

Materials and methods

Fifteen subjects with suspected or proven gram-positive bacterial infection of either gender between 18 years and 65 years of age were enrolled. Vancomycin at the dose of 1 g every 12 hours was administered over 1-hour period and pharmacokinetic assessments performed on blood samples collected on days 1 and 3. Vancomycin concentrations were measured on validated liquid chromatography mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using Winnonlin (Version 6.3; Pharsight, St. Louis, MO).

Results

The mean C_max, elimination half-life, AUC_0–12hours, volume of distribution, and clearance of single dose were 36.46 μg/mL (±14.87), 3.98 hours (±1.31), 113.51 μg/mL (±49.51), 52.01 L (±31.31), and 8.90 mL/minute (±3.29), respectively, and at steady state were 40.87 μg/mL (±19.29), 6.27 hours (±3.39), 147.94 μg/mL (±72.89), 56.39 L (±42.13), and 6.98 mL/minute (±4.48), respectively. The elimination half-life increased almost two-fold at steady state. The steady state mean AUC_0–24 was 295.89 µg/mL (±153.82). Out of 45 trough levels, 32 (71.11%) concentrations were below recommended range.

Conclusion

Recommended AUC_0–24hours and trough concentrations were not achieved in majority of patients with current dosing, suggesting reevaluation of current vancomycin dosing. Individualized treatment based on close monitoring of vancomycin serum concentrations in critically ill patients is imperative.

How to cite this article

Mali NB, Deshpande SP, Wandalkar PP, Gupta VA, Karnik ND, Gogtay NJ, et al. Single-dose and Steady-state Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to Medical Intensive Care Unit of India. IJCCM 2019;23(11):513–517.

Pharmacokinetic Properties of Micafungin in Critically Ill Patients Diagnosed with Invasive Candidiasis

The estimated attributable mortality rate for invasive candidiasis (IC) in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting varies from 30 to 40%. Physiological changes in critically ill patients may affect the distribution and elimination of micafungin, and therefore, dosing adjustments might be mandatory. The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of micafungin in critically ill patients and assess the probability of target attainment. Micafungin plasma concentrations were measured to estimate the pharmacokinetic properties of micafungin. MIC values for Candida isolates were determined to assess the probability of target attainment for patients. Data from 19 patients with suspected or proven invasive candidiasis were available for analysis. The median area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state (AUC_0-24) was 89.6 mg · h/liter (interquartile range [IQR], 75.4 to 113.6 mg · h/liter); this was significantly lower than the median micafungin AUC_0-24 values of 152.0 mg · h/liter (IQR, 136.0 to 162.0 mg · h/liter) and 134.0 mg · h/liter (IQR, 118.0 to 148.6 mg · h/liter) in healthy volunteers (P = <0.0001 and P = <0.001, respectively). All Candida isolates were susceptible to micafungin, with a median MIC of 0.016 mg/liter (IQR, 0.012 to 0.023 mg/liter). The median AUC_0-24/MIC ratio was 5,684 (IQR, 4,325 to 7,578), and 3 of the 17 evaluable patients (17.6%) diagnosed with proven invasive candidiasis did not meet the AUC/MIC ratio target of 5,000. Micafungin exposure was lower in critically ill patients than in healthy volunteers. The variability in micafungin exposure in this ICU population could be explained by the patients' body weight. Our findings suggest that healthier patients (sequential organ failure assessment [SOFA] score of <10) weighing more than 100 kg and receiving 100 mg micafungin daily are at risk for inappropriate micafungin exposure and potentially inadequate antifungal treatment. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01716988.).

Low but sufficient anidulafungin exposure in critically ill patients

The efficacy of anidulafungin is driven by the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratio. Patients in intensive care may be at risk for underexposure. In critically ill patients with an invasive Candida infection, the anidulafungin exposure and a possible correlation with disease severity or plasma protein levels were explored. Concentration-time curves were therefore obtained at steady state. Anidulafungin concentrations were measured with a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. The MIC values of the Candida species were determined with the Etest. The target AUC/MIC ratio was based on European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) data. Twenty patients were included. The patients received a maintenance dose of 100 mg once daily after a loading dose of 200 mg on the first day. The mean (±standard deviation) AUC, maximum concentration of drug in plasma (Cmax), and minimum concentration of drug in plasma (Cmin) were 69.8 ± 24.1 mg · h/liter, 4.7 ± 1.4 mg/liter, and 2.2 ± 0.8 mg/liter, respectively. The MIC values of all cultured Candida species were below the EUCAST MIC breakpoints. The exposure to anidulafungin in relation to the MIC that was determined appeared sufficient in all patients. The anidulafungin exposure was low in our critically ill patients. However, combined with the low MICs of the isolated Candida strains, the lower exposure observed in comparison to the exposure in the general patient population resulted in favorable AUC/MIC ratios, based on EUCAST data. No correlation was observed between anidulafungin exposure and disease severity or plasma protein concentrations. In patients with less-susceptible Candida albicans or glabrata strains, we recommend considering determining the anidulafungin exposure to ensure adequate exposure. (This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01047267.).

Approaches for dosage individualisation in critically ill patients

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacokinetic variability in critically ill patients is the result of the overlapping of multiple pathophysiological and clinical factors. Unpredictable exposure from standard dosage regimens may influence the outcome of treatment. Therefore, strategies for dosage individualisation are recommended in this setting.

AREAS COVERED

The authors focus on several approaches for dosage individualisation that have been developed, ranging from the well-established therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) up to the innovative application of pharmacogenomics criteria. Furthermore, the authors summarise the specific population pharmacokinetic models for different drugs developed for critically ill patients to improve the initial dosage selection and the Bayesian forecasting of serum concentrations. The authors also consider the use of Monte Carlo simulation for the selection of dosage strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) modelling and dosage individualisation methods based on mathematical and statistical criteria will contribute in improving pharmacologic treatment in critically ill patients. Moreover, substantial effort will be necessary to integrate pharmacogenomics criteria into critical care practice. The lack of availability of target biomarkers for dosage adjustment emphasizes the value of TDM which allows a large part of treatment outcome variability to be controlled.

Key Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Isepamicin in Febrile Neutropenic Cancer Patients and in Women with Acute Pelvic Inflammatory Disease

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of isepamicin were studied in 8 febrile neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancy and in 20 young women with acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Isepamicin was given as a slow intravenous infusion over 30 min at a dose of 15 mg/kg once daily (OD). Serum levels of isepamicin were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and PK analyses were obtained based on a one-compartment open model after 24 hours (steady state) and after 7 days. On day 1, the volume of distribution (Vd) of isepamicin, for both populations, appeared about 30% higher than classically reported in healthy individuals: 0.31 and 0.36 L/kg for neutropenic and PID patients respectively. However on day 7, Vd displayed significant reduction (0.28 and 0.27 L/kg, respectively for neutropenic and PID patients). A reduction of isepamicin clearance was also observed between day 1 and day 7 (137 vs 120 mL/min and 130 vs 101 mL/min for neutropenic and PID populations, respectively). Such changes are consistent with a significant increase in the Cmax concentrations (45 vs 50 mg/L, and 38 vs 49 mg/L) and in the AUC (136 vs 158 and 137 vs 162 mg/L.h) observed after a week of treatment in neutropenic and PID patients, respectively. In conclusion, taking into account the importance of reaching early active concentrations, we recommend the use of higher loading dose of isepamicin (>15 mg/kg) in neutropenic cancer patients and in women with PID, particularly in case of a combination with a possibly ineffective antibacterial agent, in case of infection with bacteria at upper limit of susceptibility, in the presence of high infectious inoculum or in the presence of sequestered sites of infection.

[Monitoring aminoglycosides in an Intensive Care Unit]

OBJECTIVES

This monocentric, observational and retrospective survey was performed to check the appropriateness between aminoglycoside prescriptions and inhibitor quotient to be reached, in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. We identified variability factors for aminoglycoside plasmatic concentrations at peak such as standardized index of gravity (IGS2 scale), age, sex, weight, and severity of sepsis.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Eighty-seven ICU patients received an antibiotic combination mandatorily including an aminoglycoside (amikacin or gentamicin) as curative treatment for a severe infection. Prescribed dosages were 15mg/kg for amikacin and 5mg/kg for gentamicin. The maximal concentration (Cmax) and minimal inhibiting concentration (MIC) of involved bacteria were recorded. The aminoglycoside ratio Cmax/MIC, called inhibitor quotient, was determined. The inhibitor quotient was considered efficient when superior to 10. The Cmax for aminoglycoside first peak was also compared with the theoretical Cmax to be reached.

RESULTS

In the aminoglycoside Cmax, 50.3% were efficient (59.6% for amikacin Cmax and 38.9% for gentamicin Cmax). In 46% of the cases, the inhibitor quotient was efficient; 12.6% of Cmax reached the theoretical Cmax. Factors identified as negatively interacting with biological efficiency were: Gram-positive bacteria or anaerobic bacteria infections and planned surgery.

CONCLUSION

In the inhibitor quotients, 49.7% were at inefficient rates, even when the recommended aminoglycoside dosage for was given. Therefore, dose and administration should be updated.

Population pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in intensive care unit patients: influence of glomerular filtration rate, mechanical ventilation, and reason for admission

The aim of this study was to develop a population-pharmacokinetic model of ceftazidime in intensive care unit patients to include the influence of patients' characteristics on the pharmacokinetics. Forty-nine patients for model building and 23 patients for validation were included in a randomized study. They received ceftazidime at 2 g three times a day or as 6 g per day continuously. A NONMEM pharmacokinetic model was constructed, and the influences of covariates were studied. The model was validated by a comparison of the predicted and observed concentrations. A final model was elaborated from the whole population. Total clearance (CL) was significantly correlated with the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) calculated by modification of the diet in renal disease (MDRD), the central volume of distribution (V1) with intubation, and the peripheral volume of distribution (V2) with the reason for admission. The mean pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: CL, 5.48 liters/h, 40%; V1, 10.48 liters, 34%; V2, 32.12 liters, 59%; total volume, 42.60 liters, 45%; and intercompartmental clearance, 16.19 liters/h, 42%. In the polytrauma population (mechanically ventilated), the time above the MIC at steady state never corresponds to 100% for discontinuous administration, and the target concentration of five times the MIC was reached with a 6-g/day dose only for patients with an MDRD of <150 ml/min. We showed that the GFR-MDRD, mechanical ventilation, and the reason for admission may influence the achieved concentrations of ceftazidime. Our model allows the a priori dosing to be adjusted to the individual patient.

Dosing Regimes for Antimicrobials during Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH)

The pharmacokinetic profile of antibiotics used in critically ill patients during continuous haemofiltration is different both from healthy people and from stable patients on long-term dialysis. This article reviews the patient-related, drug-related and haemofiltration-related variables influencing drug elimination in this group of patients, and provides specific recommendations for antibiotic dosing for different classes of antibiotics. Loading doses do not need to be altered. Subsequent dose adjustment should be based on the estimated ultrafiltration capacity of the renal replacement technique and the degree of extracorporeal clearance. A table of recommended doses is provided.

Comparison of two methods to obtain a desired first isepamicin peak in intensive care patients

A randomized multicenter study in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, evaluated the capacity of a Bayesian method to obtain an optimal first isepamicin (ISP) peak of 80 mg/L in comparison to a fixed loading dose (LD). Patients (n=236) over 18 years of age were enrolled from 6 September 1997 to 17 July 1999 and randomly assigned to received ISP in a calculated dose (CD) or a loading dose (LD) of 25 mg/kg body weight. The CD was estimated using a specific population model with Bayesian methodology implemented in the PKS program (Abbott PKS, Abbott Diagnostics, Rungis, France). The data required included age, body weight, height, gender and serum creatinine. ISP disposition is described by a one-compartment model. Blood samples were drawn 1 and 24 h after the start of infusion for fluorescence polarization immunoassay measurement of serum ISP concentrations. The predictive performance was assessed by computing bias and precision. Peak concentrations were significantly higher in CD group than the LD group (84.2 +/- 28.6 vs. 74.7 +/- 24.1 mg/L, respectively; P=0.008), but trough levels were comparable. The optimal ISP peak was attained by a significantly higher percentage of CD patients (P=0.018), and by significantly more CD patients on mechanical ventilation (P=0.025), and with simplified acute physiological scores (SAPS) > 35 (P=0.002). Pharmacokinetic parameters were similar for the two groups with large interindividual variations. Mean (+/- SD) volume of distribution of ventilated patients (72%) was significantly higher than of nonventilated patients (23.31 +/- 7.35 vs. 20.60 +/- 6.30 L, respectively; P=0.001). No relationship was found between the volume of distribution and SAPS. Total clearance was significantly correlated with estimated CLCR (creatinine clearance) (P=0.0001). Precision (RMSE) is better for CD than for LD strategy, respectively 27.96 and 28.66 mg/L. The Bayesian method was significantly more accurate and performed particularly well in ventilated patients and patients with high SAPS, compare to an LD of 25 mg/kg to obtain a first ISP peak of 80 mg/L in ICU patients. Therefore, a fixed dose of 28.5 mg/kg would be also adequate to reach a peak of 80 mg/L.

Pharmacokinetics of oral acyclovir in neonates and in infants: a population analysis

Acyclovir is approved for the treatment of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infections in children by the intravenous and oral routes. However, its use by the oral route in children younger than 2 years of age is limited due to a lack of pharmacokinetic data. The objectives of the present study were to determine the typical pharmacokinetics of an oral suspension of acyclovir given to children younger than 2 years of age and the interindividual variabilities in the values of the pharmacokinetic parameters in order to support the proposed dosing regimen (24 mg/kg of body weight three times a day for patients younger than 1 month of age or four times a day otherwise). Children younger than age 2 years with HSV or VZV infections were enrolled in a multicenter study. Children were treated for at least 5 days with an acyclovir oral suspension. Plasma samples were obtained at steady state, before acyclovir administration, and at 2, 3, 5, and 8 h after acyclovir administration. Acyclovir concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. The data were analyzed by a population approach. Data for 79 children were considered in the pharmacokinetic study (212 samples, 1 to 5 samples per patient). Acyclovir clearance was related to the estimated glomerular filtration rate, body surface area, and serum creatinine level. The volume of distribution was related to body weight. The elimination half-life decreased sharply during the first month after birth, from 10 to 15 h to 2.5 h. Bioavailability was 0.12. The interindividual variability was less pronounced when the parameters were normalized with respect to body weight. Hence, dosage adjustment by body weight is recommended for this population. Simulations showed that the length of time that acyclovir remains above the 50% inhibitory concentration during a 24-h period was more than 12 h for HSV but not for VZV. The proposed dosing regimen seems adequate for the treatment of HSV infections, while for the treatment of VZV infections, a twofold increase in the dose seems necessary for children older than age 3 months.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of isepamicin

Isepamicin is an aminoglycoside antibacterial with properties similar to those of amikacin, but with better activity against strains producing type I 6'-acetyltransferase. The antibacterial spectrum includes Enterobacteriaceae and staphylococci. Anaerobes, Neisseriaceae and streptococci are resistant. The lower and upper break-points are 8 and 16 mg/L. Like other aminoglycosides, isepamicin exhibits a strong concentration-dependent bactericidal effect, a long post-antibiotic effect (several hours) and induces adaptive resistance. Isepamicin is administered intravenously or intramuscularly at a dosage of 15 mg/kg once daily or 7.5 mg/kg twice daily. Isepamicin is not bound to plasma proteins, and it distributes in extracellular fluids and into some cells (outer hair cells, kidney cortex) by active transport. Isepamicin is not metabolised and is eliminated solely via the renal route with an elimination half-life (t 1/2 beta) of 2 to 3 hours in adults with normal renal function. The clearance of isepamicin is reduced in neonates, and 7.5 mg/kg once daily is recommended in children <16 days old. Clearance is also reduced in the elderly, but no dosage adjustment is required. In patients with chronic renal impairment, isepamicin clearance is proportional to creatinine clearance (CLCR); the recommended regimen is 8 mg/kg with an administration interval of 24 hours in moderate impairment, 48 hours in severe impairment, 72 hours for CL(CR) 0.6 to 1.14 L/h (10 to 19 ml/min) and 96 hours for CL(CR) 0.36 to 0.54 L/h (6 to 9 ml/min). In end-stage renal failure, isepamicin is eliminated by haemodialysis, but the administration interval should be determined by monitoring the plasma concentration. Compared with healthy volunteers, patients in the intensive care unit or with neutropenic cancer have an increased volume of distribution and a lower clearance, but the 15 mg/kg once daily regimen remains adequate. Isepamicin kinetics are linear in the range 7.5 to 25 mg/kg, so that dosage adjustments, if necessary, are straightforward. Isepamicin can induce nephro-, vestibulo- and oto-toxicity. However, animal and clinical studies show that isepamicin is one of the less toxic aminoglycosides. The usefulness of maintaining serum aminoglycoside concentrations within a therapeutic range remains controversial. With isepamicin, it is proposed to achieve a 1-hour concentration (30 minutes after a 30-minute infusion) >40 mg/L to maximise bactericidal efficacy, and a 'trough' concentration (at the end of the administration interval) <5 mg/L to minimise toxicity. These thresholds should be modified on an individual basis, considering covariates such as concomitant treatment, underlying disease, nature of bacterial strain and site of infection.

Pharmacokinetics of isepamicin during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration

The objective of this study was to analyze the pharmacokinetics of isepamicin during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. Six patients received 15 mg of isepamicin per kg of body weight. The mean isepamicin concentration peak in serum was 62.88 +/- 18.20 mg/liter 0.5 h after the infusion. The elimination half-life was 7. 91 +/- 0.83 h. The mean total body clearance was 1.75 +/- 0.28 liters/h, and dialysate outlet (DO) clearance was 2.76 +/- 0.59 liters/h. The mean volume of distribution was 19.83 +/- 2.95 liters. The elimination half-life, DO clearance, and volume of distribution were almost constant. In this group of patients, the initial dosage of 15 mg/kg appeared to be adequate, but the dosage interval should be determined by monitoring residual isepamicin concentrations in plasma.

Non steady state and steady state PKS Bayesian forecasting and vancomycin pharmacokinetics in ICU adult patients

The pharmacokinetics of vancomycin was investigated in adult ICU patients after the first administration and at steady state. Then the predictive performance of a two-compartment Bayesian forecasting program was assessed in these patients by using population-based parameters and three non steady state vancomycin concentrations as feedback information. Finally a prospective investigation was carried out to search potential covariates. At steady state, a significant decrease (around 30%) in clearance (CL) was observed, while creatinine clearance (CLcr) was stable and a significant increase (around 30%) in volume of distribution (V(SS)) was observed. A two-fold increase in elimination half-life was found. CL was weakly correlated with CLcr at onset of therapy and at steady state. The Bayesian program tended to overpredict vancomycin peak and trough concentrations. A larger mean prediction error and a poorer precision were observed when population-based parameter estimates were used (no feedback) compared to feedback prediction, but the differences were not significant. Mechanical ventilation and concurrent opioid therapy may be pertinent covariates of vancomycin pharmacokinetics. The current work has shown that vancomycin pharmacokinetics in ICU patients displayed a significant variability and a significant change in both clearance and distribution during the course of therapy. Further investigation is necessary to clarify these findings. Moreover, the use of the Bayesian forecasting PKS program in our patients led to a prediction with low bias but rather poor precision. This outcome highlights the need to implement a population modeling approach, to determine the vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters and covariates in our ICU patients, and to apply this information to provide more accurate concentration predictions.

Isepamicin in intensive care unit patients with nosocomial pneumonia: population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study

A population approach was used to determine isepamicin pharmacokinetics in 196 intensive care unit patients treated for nosocomial pneumonia with isepamicin and a broad-spectrum beta-lactam. Patients were randomized in four groups with respect to the following isepamicin dosing regimens: (i) 15 mg/kg od for 5 days or (ii) 10 days, (iii) 25 mg/kg on the first day followed by 15 mg/kg od for 4 days or (iv) 9 days. A total of 1489 serum isepamicin concentrations were measured (median, eight per patient; range, 1-18). Mean +/- S.D. 1 h-peak levels at day 1 were 76 +/- 32 mg/L after the 25 mg/kg dose (n = 85) and 43 +/- 15 mg/L after the 15 mg/kg dose (n = 99). A bicompartmental model was fitted to the data by a mixed-effect modelling approach. Isepamicin clearance was related to age, bodyweight and serum creatinine level. Central volume of distribution was related to bodyweight. Pharmacokinetic parameters were independent of the dosage in the range 15-25 mg/kg and were not different in the patients treated for 5 or 10 days. Bayesian estimates of individual pharmacokinetic parameters were used to calculate various surrogate markers of isepamicin exposure to be tentatively correlated with clinical outcome and nephrotoxicity. No correlation was found between peak, AUC or their ratio with MIC and clinical efficacy. A weak correlation was found between the increase of serum creatinine level (day 1 versus day 5) and isepamicin 24 h trough level at day 1 (R2 = 0.10). These data do not favour a systematic therapeutic monitoring of isepamicin in intensive care unit patients, at least with the doses and antibiotic combinations used in this study.

Population pharmacokinetic study of amikacin administered once or twice daily to febrile, severely neutropenic adults

Once-daily (o.d.) administration of 20 mg of amikacin per kg of body weight to neutropenic patients has been validated by clinical studies, but amikacin pharmacokinetics have been documented only for the 7.5-mg/kg twice-daily (b.i.d.) regimen in this population. In order to determine in neutropenic patients (i) the influence of the dosing regimen on the kinetics of amikacin, (ii) the linearity of kinetics of amikacin in the range of 7.5 to 20 mg/kg, and (iii) the influence of patient characteristics on the disposition of amikacin and (iv) to provide a rationale for dosing recommendations, we evaluated the population pharmacokinetics of amikacin administered to 57 febrile neutropenic adults (neutrophil count, <500/mm3) being treated for a hematological disorder and receiving amikacin at 7.5 mg/kg b.i.d. (n = 29) or 20 mg/kg o.d. (n = 28) and administered intravenously over 0.5 h. A total of 278 blood samples were obtained (1 to 14 samples per patient) during one or several administration intervals (1 to 47). Serum amikacin levels were measured by the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique. A mixed-effect modeling approach was used to fit a bicompartmental model to the data (NONMEM software). The influences of the dosing regimen and the demographic and biological indices on the pharmacokinetic parameters of amikacin were evaluated by the maximum-likelihood ratio test on the population model. The dosing regimen had no influence on amikacin pharmacokinetic parameters, i.e., the kinetics of amikacin were linear over the range of 7.5 to 20 mg/kg. Amikacin elimination clearance (CL) was only correlated with creatinine clearance or its covariates, namely, sex, age, body weight, and serum creatinine level. The interindividual variability of CL was 21%, while those of the central volume of distribution, the distribution clearance, and the tissue volume of distribution were 15, 30, and 25%, respectively. On the basis of the expected distribution of amikacin concentrations in this population, dosing recommendations as a function of creatinine clearance (CL[CR]) are proposed: for patients with normal renal function (CL[CR] of 80 to 130 ml/min), 20 mg/kg o.d. is recommended, whereas for patients with severe renal impairment (CL[CR], 10 to 20 ml/min), a dosage of 17 mg/kg every 48 h is recommended.

Sparse drug concentration data analysis using a population approach: a valuable tool in clinical pharmacology

1. Drug concentration or pharmacological effect data collected from patients during therapy or as part of a Phase III or post-marketing study are generally sparse (i.e. one or a few observations per patient) in nature. 2. The population approach to analysing sparse drug concentration data provides a valuable tool for obtaining information about the pharmacokinetics of drugs in special patient groups (neonates, aged or critically ill), the importance of drug interactions in the clinic (using routinely collected blood concentration data) and for conducting a 'pharmacokinetic screen' in patients during early phase efficacy trials. 3. Using a population approach to analyse drug concentration-time data collected from patients during therapy or during an early phase investigation can complement information obtained from traditional pharmacokinetic/dynamic investigations to help gain a further insight into the factors that influence dosing guidelines.