Kill kinetics and regrowth patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exposed to concentration-time profiles of tobramycin simulating in vivo infusion and bolus dosing

Changes in MIC alter responses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to tobramycin exposure

The pharmacokinetic parameters determining antibiotic efficacy are peak concentrations (Cmax), minimum (trough) concentrations (Cmin), and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). There is general agreement about the importance of Cmax and AUC for aminoglycosides, but this is not so for maintenance of Cmin. With in vitro exposures modelling in vivo administration, Pseudomonas aeruginosa reference strain ATCC 27853 (MIC, 1 mg/liter) and a higher-MIC (relatively resistant) clinical isolate (MIC, 4 mg/liter) were used to explore bacteriostatic and bactericidal outcomes. With P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, kill followed a complete bolus profile with a 30-min postdistribution peak (Cpeak30) of 10 mg/liter. The clinical isolate required a Cpeak30 bolus profile of 20 mg/liter for kill, and there was no difference between the efficacies of the bolus and infusion exposures. Bolus profiles that were truncated at 8.5 h and producing sublethal effects were then combined with a wide range of Cmins. With a Cpeak30 profile of 8 mg/liter, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 showed a graded bacteriostatic response until a Cmin of > or = 0.8 mg/liter, when complete kill resulted. In contrast, bactericidal effects on the clinical isolate required a Cpeak30 profile of 18 mg/liter with a Cmin of > or = 1.0 mg/liter. Therefore, Cmin also contributes to the bactericidal effect of tobramycin, with requirements showing minor variation with change in MIC. Dosing principles for relatively resistant (higher-MIC) organisms are suggested from the data. Relatively higher aminoglycoside doses via infusion regimens are likely to be needed to generate higher peak concentrations and higher AUC values necessary for bactericidal effect in resistant organisms. Maintenance of trough concentrations on the order of 1.0 mg/liter during the interdose interval will tend to guard against the possibility of inadequate peak and AUC exposures for kill.

Initial concentration-time profile of gentamicin determines efficacy against Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 13047

In vitro studies were designed to investigate the influence of peak drug concentration (Cmax), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and, consequently, the trough concentration on the bactericidal effects of gentamicin against Enterobacter cloacae (MIC, 0.5 mg/liter) by simulating bolus versus infusion administration and bolus dosing with altered drug clearance. Bacteria in the lag phase were exposed to gentamicin concentration-time profiles modelling either bolus or infusion dosing (AUC constant, Cmax changing) with 30-min postdose peak concentrations (Cpeak30) of 4, 6, 8, and 10 mg/liter or bolus dosing with normal and double drug clearance (Cmax constant, AUC changing) corresponding to normal clearance profiles with Cpeak30 of 6 and 8 mg/liter. Exposure to gentamicin caused early bactericidal effects apparent by 2 h, followed by variable bacteriostatic and recovery phases. Exposure to bolus profiles resulted in greater bactericidal activity than the corresponding infusion profile up to a Cpeak30 of 8 mg/liter. At a Cpeak30 of 10 mg/liter, there were no differences in bactericidal effect. Double clearance profiles had a reduced bactericidal effect at 6 mg/liter compared to the corresponding normal clearance profile, but no differences in bactericidal effect were observed for 8-mg/liter double and normal clearance profiles. These results suggest that the initial exposure (i.e., 0 to 30 min) is a more important determinant for bacterial killing than the AUC or trough concentration for this bacterium. Subject to confirmation of these findings with other gram-negative bacteria, to optimize aminoglycoside efficacy the initial exposure (Cmax) should be maximized by giving higher doses or bolus administration at intervals which may not produce detectable trough concentrations. Clinical trials with a broad range of patients, especially those with higher clearance, would confirm these in vitro observations and define optimal dosing recommendations.