Assessment of the effects of combination therapy with ciprofloxacin and fenbufen on the central nervous systems of healthy volunteers by quantitative electroencephalography

Celecoxib does not induce convulsions nor does it affect GABAA receptor binding activity in the presence of new quinolones in mice

We sought to determine whether celecoxib would induce convulsions when coadministered with new quinolone antimicrobial agents in mice. The oral administration of celecoxib (500 mg/kg) alone or in combination with enoxacin (500 mg/kg), lomefloxacin (1000 mg/kg), ciprofloxacin (1000 mg/kg), or levofloxacin (1000 mg/kg) induced no convulsions in mice. In contrast, some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), fenbufen (200 mg/kg), indomethacin (500 mg/kg), and naproxen (500 mg/kg) induced convulsions in combination with the majority of the new quinolones tested. gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA)(A) receptor blockade-mediated neuronal excitation is assumed to be involved in these toxic convulsions. Enoxacin (100 microM) and lomefloxacin (100 microM) only slightly reduced [3H]muscimol binding to GABA(A) receptors in mouse whole brain membrane. However, these reductions were markedly enhanced by the addition of fenbufen (100 microM), indomethacin (100 microM), or naproxen (100 microM). Conversely, celecoxib (100 microM) had no apparent effect on [3H]muscimol binding when applied alone or in combination with enoxacin or lomefloxacin. These results suggest that celecoxib may be a more desirable anti-inflammatory agent with respect to drug interactions with new quinolones compared with some conventional NSAIDs.

Fluoroquinolone adverse effects and drug interactions

Extensive pharmacologic and clinical development of quinolone antimicrobial agents has resulted in improved antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic features, toxicity, and drug-drug interaction profiles. Nalidixic acid and other early quinolones had limited use due to poor pharmacokinetics, relatively narrow antimicrobial spectrum of activity, and frequent adverse effects. Beginning with the development of fluoroquinolones, such as norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin, in the 1980s, the agents assumed a greatly expanded clinical role because of their broad antimicrobial spectrum of action, improved pharmacokinetic properties, and more acceptable safety profile. Although the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of the drugs have improved significantly, a major area of continued emphasis is to further reduce the frequency and severity of adverse events and drug-drug interactions. Older agents such as ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin are still extensively prescribed, but the focus of this article is on the newer fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin and other drugs that have been approved or have been under investigation since approximately 1997).

Anaphylactoid reaction to levofloxacin

Anaphylactoid and/or anaphylactic reactions to fluoroquinolones are estimated to occur in 0.46-1.2/100,000 patients. A 49-year-old woman with a history of asthma was admitted for a presumed asthma exacerbation related to an infectious process. She was given levofloxacin and standard management for an acute exacerbation. On two occasions the patient's respiratory distress worsened, requiring intubation. The second reaction occurred immediately after levofloxacin administration and was accompanied by a marked cutaneous reaction. Levofloxacin was discontinued, and supportive care was provided. No further symptoms occurred. The patient later was found to have been started on levofloxacin before admission for a suspected upper respiratory infection.

The safety profile of the fluoroquinolones

BACKGROUND

Premarketing trials showed the fluoroquinolone agents to have a favorable side-effect profile, with treatment-related adverse events comprising gastrointestinal, central nervous system, and dermatologic effects that were generally mild and reversible on cessation of treatment. However, postmarketing surveillance studies have identified severe adverse events, including severe anaphylaxis, QTc-interval prolongation, and potential cardiotoxicity, associated with 3 quinolone agents that either resulted in the removal of the agent from the market (temafloxacin and grepafloxacin) or significantly restricted its use due to substantial mortality and morbidity associated with liver toxicity (trovafloxacin). To date, there have been no such significant adverse events associated with the older fluoroquinolone agents, including ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, norfloxacin, and levofloxacin. However, there are fewer data from postmarketing surveillance studies on the most recently approved agents, such as moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin, or agents awaiting approval, such as gemifloxacin.

OBJECTIVE

This paper examines safety data from the premarketing trials and postmarketing surveillance studies of fluoroquinolones available in the United States.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed to identify all English-language studies published since 1980 concerning the safety profiles of the fluoroquinolones.

CONCLUSIONS

The fluoroquinolone antibacterial agents offer broad-spectrum therapy in patients with a variety of infections. Given similar spectra of activity, the choice between quinolones may be based on differences in efficacy and safety or tolerability profiles. Most drug reactions involving these agents are minor and reversible on discontinuing treatment, but adverse effects can be associated with significant mortality and morbidity, as was seen in the case of trovafloxacin and temafloxacin.