Effects of DU-6859a, a new quinolone antimicrobial, on theophylline metabolism in in vitro and in vivo studies

Reduced theophylline clearance due to hepatic congestion secondary to right heart failure - A population pharmacokinetic study

Theophylline, a beneficial drug with bronchodilatory and anti-inflammatory effects, is used for the treatment of respiratory diseases. Pulmonary (PC) and hepatic congestion (HC) are secondary to the development of left- and right-sided heart failure (HF), respectively. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of PC and HC on theophylline clearance (CL) by population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis with consideration of the severity of HF assessed by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification. We obtained 710 minimum steady-state concentrations from 201 Japanese bronchial asthma patients with and without HF. PPK analysis was performed by NONMEM. In the analysis, the left ventricular ejection fraction, smoking (SMK), clarithromycin (CAM), sex, and age were also considered as covariates. The final model of apparent theophylline clearance (CL/F) was as follows: CL/F (L/hr/kg) = 0.0465 × 1.40^SMK × 0.870^CAM × 0.863^{HC(+)NYHA II} × 0.634^{HC(+)NYHA III} × 0.586^{HC(-)NYHA IV} × 0.467^{HC(+)NYHA IV}. SMK is a well-known factor that markedly enhances theophylline clearance through the induction of CYP1A enzymes, while CAM has been reported to inhibit CYP3A4. The final model indicates that HF patients with HC show reduced clearance of theophylline depending on the severity of HF. In this study, no effects of PC were observed.

Differences in Theophylline Clearance Between Patients With Chronic Hepatitis and Those With Liver Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Theophylline, a xanthine derivative drug, is used for the treatment of respiratory diseases, such as asthma, and is primarily eliminated by hepatic metabolism. There is marked interindividual variability in theophylline clearance. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of chronic hepatitis (CH), liver cirrhosis (LC), and other covariates on theophylline clearance by population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively obtained 496 trough concentrations of theophylline at steady state from 226 adult patients with bronchial asthma. The liver functions of the patients were classified into 3 categories: normal hepatic function, CH, and LC. The PPK analysis was performed using the NONMEM program. CH, LC, age, smoking status, coadministration of clarithromycin (CAM), and sex were considered as covariates that affected theophylline clearance.

RESULTS

Theophylline clearance (CL/F per kg) was significantly influenced by CH, LC, smoking, and CAM. The final model of theophylline clearance was as follows: CL/F (L/h·kg) = 0.0484 × 1.40 × 0.861 × 0.889 × 0.557. Smoking is a well-known factor that markedly enhances CL/F through the induction of CYP1A enzymes, whereas CAM has been reported to inhibit CYP3A4. The final model for hepatic function showed that CL/F in CH and LC patients was 0.043 and 0.027 L/h/kg, respectively, and it was lower than that in patients with normal hepatic function. As theophylline clearance depends on intrinsic hepatic clearance, lower CL/F in patients with LC than in those with CH may be due to a decrease in the metabolic enzymatic capability of LC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences exist in theophylline clearance between CH and LC patients as per the PPK analysis.

Determination of sitafloxacin in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method: application to a pharmacokinetic study

A high-performance liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric (HPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated to determine sitafloxacin in human plasma with dextrorphan as internal standard. Chromatographic separation was performed on a ZORBAX SB-C18 column (3.5μm, 2.1mm×100mm) with the mobile phase of methanol/water (containing 0.1% formic acid) (46:54, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.2mL/min. Quantification was performed using multiple-reaction monitoring of the transitions at m/z 410.2 → 392.2 for sitafloxacin and m/z 258.1 → 157.1 for dextrorphan, respectively. The calibration curve was linear over the range of 5-2500ng/mL with the lower limit of quantification of 5ng/mL for sitafloxacin. The intra- and inter-day precisions were less than 8.3% and the deviations of assay accuracies were within ±4.1%. Sitafloxacin was sufficiently stable under all relevant analytical conditions. This method was successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study of sitafloxacin in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Bacterial Infections in the Elderly Patient: Focus on Sitafloxacin

Sitafloxacin (DU-6859a) is a new-generation oral fluoroquinolone with in vitro activity against a broad range of Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, including anaerobic bacteria, as well as against atypical bacterial pathogens. Particularly in Japan this antibiotic was approved in 2008 for treatment of a number of bacterial infections caused by Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative cocci and rods, including anaerobia atypical bacterial pathogens. As compared to oral levofloxacin sitafloxacin was non-inferior in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and non-inferior in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, according to the results of randomized, double-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority trials. Non-comparative studies demonstrated the efficacy of oral sitafloxacin in otorhinolaryngological infections, urethritis in men, cervicitis in women and odontogenic infections. Most common adverse reactions were gastrointestinal disorders and laboratory abnormalities in patients receiving oral sitafloxacin; diarrhea and liver enzyme elevations were among the common. In the Japanese population sitafloxacin covers broad spectrum of bacteria as compared to carbapenems, whereas in the Caucasians its use is currently limited due to the potential for ultraviolet A phototoxicity. Sitafloxacin is a promising therapeutic agent which merits further investigation in randomized clinical trials of elderly patients.

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model characterizing mechanism-based inhibition of CYP1A2 for predicting theophylline/antofloxacin interaction in both rats and humans

Clinical studies have revealed that some fluoroquinolones may cause severe adverse effects when co-administered with substrates of CYP1A2. Our previous study showed antofloxacin (ATFX) was responsible for mechanism-based inhibition (MBI) of the metabolism of phenacetin in rats. In the clinical setting, ATFX is likely to be administrated with theophylline (TP), which is mainly metabolized by CYP1A2. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible mechanism of TP/ATFX interaction. In vitro studies showed that the inhibitory effect of ATFX on the formation of three TP metabolites depended on NADPH, the pre-inhibition time, and ATFX concentration, i.e., factors which characterize MBI. In vivo studies demonstrated that single-dose ATFX (20 mg/kg) did not affect the pharmacokinetic behavior of TP, but multidose ATFX (20 mg/kg b.i.d. for 7.5 days) significantly increased the AUC of TP, decreased the amount of three TP metabolites in urine, and suppressed hepatic microsomal activity. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model characterizing MBI of the three TP metabolites was developed for predicting TP/ATFX interaction in rats; this model was further extrapolated to humans. The predicted results were in good agreement with observed data. All the results indicated that ATFX was responsible for MBI of the metabolism of TP, and the PBPK model characterizing MBI may give good prediction of TP/ATFX interaction.

Novel antibacterial agents for the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections

With the continuing development of clinical drug resistance among bacteria and the advent of resistance to the recently released agents quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid, the need for new, effective agents to treat multi-drug-resistant Gram-positive infections remains important. This review focuses on agents presently in clinical development for the treatment of serious multidrug-resistant staphylococcal, enterococcal and pneumococcal infections, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Agents to be discussed that affect the prokaryotic cell wall include the antimethicillin-resistant S. aureus cephalosporins BAL9141 and RWJ-54428, the glycopeptides oritavancin and dalbavancin and the lipopeptide daptomycin. Topoisomerase inhibitors include the fluoroquinolones gemifloxacin, sitafloxacin and garenoxacin. Protein synthesis inhibitors are represented by the ketolides telithromycin and cethromycin, the oxazolidinones and the glycylcycline tigecycline. Although each of these compounds has demonstrated antibacterial activity against antibiotic-resistant pathogens, their final regulatory approval will depend on an acceptable clinical safety profile.

A critical review of the fluoroquinolones: focus on respiratory infections

The new fluoroquinolones (clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin) offer excellent activity against Gram-negative bacilli and improved Gram-positive activity (e.g. against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus) over ciprofloxacin. Ciprofloxacin still maintains the best in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin display improved activity against anaerobes (e.g. Bacteroides fragilis) versus ciprofloxacin. All of the new fluoroquinolones display excellent bioavailability and have longer serum half-lives than ciprofloxacin allowing for once daily dose administration. Clinical trials comparing the new fluoroquinolones to each other or to standard therapy have demonstrated good efficacy in a variety of community-acquired respiratory infections (e.g. pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute sinusitis). Limited data suggest that the new fluoroquinolones as a class may lead to better outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis versus comparators. Several of these agents have either been withdrawn from the market, had their use severely restricted because of adverse effects (clinafloxacin because of phototoxicity and hypoglycaemia; grepafloxacin because of prolongation of the QTc and resultant torsades de pointes; sparfloxacin because of phototoxicity; and trovafloxacin because of hepatotoxicity), or were discontinued during developmental phases. The remaining fluoroquinolones such as gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin have adverse effect profiles similar to ciprofloxacin. Extensive post-marketing safety surveillance data (as are available with ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) are required for all new fluoroquinolones before safety can be definitively established. Drug interactions are limited; however, all fluoroquinolones interact with metal ion containing drugs (eg. antacids). The new fluoroquinolones (gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin) offer several advantages over ciprofloxacin and are emerging as important therapeutic agents in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory infections. Their broad spectrum of activity which includes respiratory pathogens such as penicillin and macrolide resistant S. pneumoniae, favourable pharmacokinetic parameters, good bacteriological and clinical efficacy will lead to growing use of these agents in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute sinusitis. These agents may result in cost savings especially in situations where, because of their potent broad-spectrum activity and excellent bioavailability, they may be used orally in place of intravenous antibacterials. Prudent use of the new fluoroquinolones will be required to minimise the development of resistance to these agents.

Potential interactions of the extended-spectrum fluoroquinolones with the CNS

The new generation fluoroquinolones -- sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, grepafloxacin and trovafloxacin -- have been designed to respond to the clinical need for extended antimicrobial cover in the face of increasing global microbial resistance. Their main focus is in the treatment of respiratory infections, particularly those acquired in the community. CNS adverse effects, such as dizziness and headache, are known to occur relatively commonly with some fluoroquinolones and are not, in general, well tolerated by patients. The structural component of the fluoroquinolone molecule believed to be responsible for improved gram-positive activity is also believed to be implicated in the production of CNS adverse effects, including those arising from drug interactions with theophylline and NSAIDs. Inhibition of brain gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor binding appears to be a strong indicator of CNS activity, though N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor binding has also been implicated. In accordance with the results of these predictive studies, clinical trials have found sparfloxacin, levofloxacin and grepafloxacin to be associated with a low incidence of CNS events. Trovafloxacin has been found to be associated with a higher incidence of CNS events (particularly lightheadedness and dizziness) than the other 3 agents. Ongoing and future clinical studies will help to define the usefulness of the predictive models, as well as reveal the full CNS adverse event profile of these and other investigational fluoroquinolones.