Single-dose pharmacokinetics of meropenem during continuous venovenous hemofiltration

Spider chart, greenness and whiteness assessment of experimentally designed multivariate models for simultaneous determination of three drugs used as a combinatory antibiotic regimen in critical care units: Comparative study

In this study, five earth-friendly spectrophotometric methods using multivariate techniques were developed to analyze levofloxacin, linezolid, and meropenem, which are utilized in critical care units as combination therapies. These techniques were used to determine the mentioned medications in laboratory-prepared mixtures, pharmaceutical products and spiked human plasma that had not been separated before handling. These methods were named classical least squares (CLS), principal component regression (PCR), partial least squares (PLS), genetic algorithm partial least squares (GA-PLS), and artificial neural network (ANN). The methods used a five-level, three-factor experimental design to make different concentrations of the antibiotics mentioned (based on how much of them are found in the plasma of critical care patients and their linearity ranges). The approaches used for levofloxacin, linezolid, and meropenem were in the ranges of 3-15, 8-20, and 5-25 µg/mL, respectively. Several analytical tools were used to test the proposed methods' performance. These included the root mean square error of prediction, the root mean square error of cross-validation, percentage recoveries, standard deviations, and correlation coefficients. The outcome was highly satisfactory. The study found that the root mean square errors of prediction for levofloxacin were 0.090, 0.079, 0.065, 0.027, and 0.001 for the CLS, PCR, PLS, GA-PLS, and ANN models, respectively. The corresponding values for linezolid were 0.127, 0.122, 0.108, 0.05, and 0.114, respectively. For meropenem, the values were 0.230, 0.222, 0.179, 0.097, and 0.099 for the same models, respectively. These results indicate that the developed models were highly accurate and precise. This study compared the efficiency of artificial neural networks and classical chemometric models in enhancing spectral data selectivity for quickly identifying three antimicrobials. The results from these five models were subjected to statistical analysis and compared with each other and with the previously published ones. Finally, the whiteness of the methods was assessed by the recently published white analytical chemistry (WAC) RGB 12, and the greenness of the proposed methods was assessed using AGREE, GAPI, NEMI, Raynie and Driver, and eco-scale, which showed that the suggested approaches had the least negative environmental impact. Furthermore, to demonstrate solvent sustainability, a greenness index using a spider chart methodology was employed.

Analytical and Clinical Validation of Assays for Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling (VAMS) of Drugs in Different Blood Matrices: A Literature Review

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) is the newest and most promising sample-collection technique for quantitatively analyzing drugs, especially for routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and pharmacokinetic studies. This technique uses an absorbent white tip to absorb a fixed volume of a sample (10-50 µL) within a few seconds (2-4 s), is more flexible, practical, and more straightforward to be applied in the field, and is probably more cost-effective than conventional venous sampling (CVS). After optimization and validation of an analytical method of a drug taken by VAMS, a clinical validation study is needed to show that the results by VAMS can substitute what is gained from CVS and to justify implementation in routine practice. This narrative review aimed to assess and present studies about optimization and analytical validation of assays for drugs taken by VAMS, considering their physicochemical drug properties, extraction conditions, validation results, and studies on clinical validation of VAMS compared to CVS. The review revealed that the bio-analysis of many drugs taken with the VAMS technique was optimized and validated. However, only a few clinical validation studies have been performed so far. All drugs that underwent a clinical validation study demonstrated good agreement between the two techniques (VAMS and CVS), but only by Bland-Altman analysis. Only for tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid were three measurements of agreement evaluated. Therefore, VAMS can be considered an alternative to CVS in routine practice, especially for tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. Still, more extensive clinical validation studies need to be performed for other drugs.

Population Pharmacokinetic Meta-Analysis and Dosing Recommendation for Meropenem in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

The optimal dosing regimen for meropenem in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) remains undefined due to small studied sample sizes and uninformative pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses in reported studies. The present study aimed to perform a population PK/PD meta-analysis of meropenem using available literature data to suggest the optimal treatment regimen. A total of 501 meropenem concentration measurements from 78 adult CRRT patients pooled from nine published studies were used to develop the population PK model for meropenem. PK/PD target (40% and 100% of the time with the unbound drug plasma concentration above the MIC) marker-based efficacy and risk of toxicity (trough concentrations of >45 mg/L) for short-term (30 min), prolonged (3 h), and continuous (24 h) infusion dosing strategies for meropenem were investigated. The impact of CRRT dose and identified covariates on the PD probability of target attainment (PTA) and predicted toxicity was also examined. Meropenem concentration data were adequately described by a two-compartment model with linear elimination. Trauma was identified as a pronounced modifier for endogenous clearance of meropenem. Simulations demonstrated that adequate PK/PD targets and low risk of toxicity could be achieved in non-trauma CRRT patients receiving meropenem regimens of 1 g every 6 h infused over 30 min, 1 g every 8 h infused over 3 h, and 2 to 4 g every 24 h infused over 24 h. The impact of CRRT dose (25 to 50 mL/kg/h) on PTA was clinically irrelevant, and continuous infusion of 3 to 4 g every 24 h was suitable for trauma CRRT patients (MICs of ≤0.5 mg/L). A population PK model was developed for meropenem in CRRT patients, and different dosing regimens were proposed for non-trauma and trauma CRRT patients.

Correlation of antimicrobial fraction unbound and sieving coefficient in critically ill patients on continuous renal replacement therapy: a systematic review

Background

Fraction unbound has been used as a surrogate for antimicrobial sieving coefficient (SC) to predict extracorporeal clearance in critically ill patients on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), but this is based largely on expert opinion.

Objectives

To examine relationships between package insert-derived fraction unbound (Fu-P), study-specific fraction unbound (Fu-S), and SC in critically ill patients receiving CRRT.

Methods

English-language studies containing patient-specific in vivo pharmacokinetic parameters for antimicrobials in critically ill patients requiring CRRT were included. The primary outcome included correlations between Fu-S, Fu-P, and SC. Secondary outcomes included correlations across protein binding quartiles, serum albumin, and predicted in-hospital mortality, and identification of predictors for SC through multivariable analysis.

Results

Eighty-nine studies including 32 antimicrobials were included for analysis. SC was moderately correlated to Fu-S (R2 = 0.55, P < 0.001) and Fu-P (R2 = 0.41, P < 0.001). SC was best correlated to Fu-S in first (<69%) and fourth (>92%) quartiles of fraction unbound and above median albumin concentrations of 24.5 g/L (R2 = 0.71, P = 0.07). Conversely, correlation was weaker in patients with mortality estimates greater than the median of 55% (R2 = 0.06, P = 0.84). SC and Fu-P were also best correlated in the first quartile of antimicrobial fraction unbound (R2 = 0.66, P < 0.001). Increasing Fu-P, flow rate, membrane surface area, and serum albumin, and decreasing physiologic charge significantly predicted increasing SC.

Conclusions

Fu-S and Fu-P were both reasonably correlated to SC. Caution should be taken when using Fu-S to calculate extracorporeal clearance in antimicrobials with 69%–92% fraction unbound or with >55% estimated in-hospital patient mortality. Fu-P may serve as a rudimentary surrogate for SC when Fu-S is unavailable.

Meropenem dosing recommendations for critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy

PURPOSES

To gather available meropenem pharmacokinetics and define drug dosing regimens for Asian critically ill patients receiving CRRT.

METHODS

All necessary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data from Asian population were gathered to develop mathematic models with first order elimination. Meropenem concentration-time profiles were calculated to evaluate efficacy based on the probability of target attainment (PTA) of 40%fT_>4MIC. A group of 5000 virtual patients was created and tested using Monte Carlo simulations for each dose in the models. The optimal dosing regimens were defined as the doses achieved at least 90% of the PTA.

RESULTS

The recommended meropenem dosing regimen for Asian critically ill patients receiving CRRT with standard (20-25 mL/kg/h) and high (35 mL/kg/h) effluent rates was 750 mg q 8 h to manage Gram negative infections with expected MIC < 2 mg/L in virtual Asian patients. Some meropenem dosages from available clinical resources could not achieve the aforementioned target. The volume of distribution, body weights and nonrenal clearance significantly contributed to drug dosing adaptation especially in the specific population.

CONCLUSIONS

A meropenem regimen of 750 mg q 8 h was recommended for Asian critically ill patients receiving 2 different CRRT modalities with standard and high effluent rates. Clinical validation of these results is needed.

Optimized meropenem dosage regimens using a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic population approach in patients undergoing continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration with high-adsorbent membrane

BACKGROUND

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of antibiotics change during sepsis and continuous renal replacement therapies in critically ill patients. Limited evidence exists on the use of the oXiris® high-adsorbent membrane.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) model for meropenem in critically ill sepsis patients undergoing continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) with the oXiris® membrane, and to design an optimal dosing regimen assessed according to the PTA.

METHODS

A prospective, open-label, observational PK trial was performed (EUDRACT 2011-005902-30). We conducted PK studies (plasma and ultrafiltrate) for at least 24 h after concomitant administration of CVVHDF and meropenem 1 g q8h. We constructed a PK model using the non-linear mixed-effects approach (NONMEM 7.3). We evaluated the suitability of different dosage regimens using Monte Carlo simulations and calculated the PTA as the percentage of subjects achieving a given percentage of time above the MIC (fT>MIC).

RESULTS

The PK of meropenem was best captured by a two-open-compartment model with zero-order input kinetics and first-order elimination. Extracorporeal CL was 7.78 L/h [relative standard error (RSE) 16.45 L/h] and central compartment V (Vc) was 24.9 L (RSE 13.73 L). Simulations showed that, for susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (EUCAST MIC ≤2 mg/L) and attainment of 100%fT>MIC, 500 mg q8h given as extended (EI) or continuous infusion (CI) would be sufficient. For a target of 100%fT>4×MIC, CI of 3000 mg q24h or 2000 mg q8h administered as EI or CI would be required.

CONCLUSIONS

We have constructed a PK model of meropenem in sepsis patients undergoing CVVHDF using the oXiris® membrane. This tool will support physicians when calculating the optimal initial dose.

A meropenem pharmacokinetics model in patients with haematological malignancies

Background

Optimal dosing of antibiotics is critical in immunocompromised patients suspected to have an infection. Data on pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem in patients with haematological malignancies are scarce.

Objectives

To optimize dosing regimens, we aimed to develop a PK population model for meropenem in this population.

Methods

Patients aged ≥18 years, hospitalized in the haematology department of our 1500 bed university hospital for a malignant haematological disease and who had received at least one dose of meropenem were eligible. Meropenem was quantified by HPLC. PK were described using a non-linear mixed-effect model and external validation performed on a distinct database. Monte Carlo simulations estimated the PTA, depending on renal function, duration of infusion and MIC. Target for free trough concentration was set at &gt;4× MIC.

Results

Overall, 88 patients (181 samples) were included, 66 patients (75%) were in aplasia and median Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) CLCR was 117 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range: 35–359). Initial meropenem dosing regimen ranged from 1 g q8h to 2 g q8h over 30 to 60 min. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination adequately described the data. Only MDRD CLCR was found to be significantly associated with CL. Only continuous infusion achieved a PTA of 100% whatever the MIC and MDRD CLCR. Short duration of infusion (&lt;60 min) failed to reach an acceptable PTA, except for bacteria with MIC &lt; 0.25 mg/L in patients with MDRD CLCR below 90 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Conclusions

In patients with malignant haematological diseases, meropenem should be administered at high dose (6 g/day) and on continuous infusion to reach acceptable trough concentrations.

A Robust Statistical Approach to Analyse Population Pharmacokinetic Data in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Renal Replacement Therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Current approaches to antibiotic dose determination in critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy are primarily based on the assessment of highly heterogeneous data from small number of patients. The standard modelling approaches limit the scope of constructing robust confidence boundaries of the distribution of pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters, especially when the evaluation of possible association of demographic and clinical factors at different levels of the distribution of drug clearance is of interest. Commonly used compartmental models generally construct the inferences through a linear or non-linear mean regression, which is inadequate when the distribution is skewed, multi-modal or effected by atypical observation. In this study, we discuss the statistical challenges in robust estimation of the confidence boundaries of the PK parameters in the presence of highly heterogenous patient characteristics.

METHODS

A novel stepwise approach to evaluate the confidence boundaries of PK parameters is proposed by combining PK modelling with mixed-effects quantile regression (MEQR) methods.

RESULTS

This method allows the assessment demographic and clinical factors' effects at any arbitrary quantiles of the outcome of interest, without restricting assumptions on the distributions. The MEQR approach allows us to investigate if the levels of association of the covariates are different at low, medium or high concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

This methodological assessment is deemed as a background initial approach to support the development of a class of statistical algorithm in constructing robust confidence intervals of PK parameters which can be used for developing an optimised antibiotic dosing guideline for critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy.

S, Aprameya IV, Sarma SP, Chakravortty D, Chandra N. Ω76: A designed antimicrobial peptide to combat carbapenem- and tigecycline-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Drug resistance is a public health concern that threatens to undermine decades of medical progress. ESKAPE pathogens cause most nosocomial infections, and are frequently resistant to carbapenem antibiotics, usually leaving tigecycline and colistin as the last treatment options. However, increasing tigecycline resistance and colistin's nephrotoxicity severely restrict use of these antibiotics. We have designed antimicrobial peptides using a maximum common subgraph approach. Our best peptide (Ω76) displayed high efficacy against carbapenem and tigecycline-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in mice. Mice treated with repeated sublethal doses of Ω76 displayed no signs of chronic toxicity. Sublethal Ω76 doses co-administered alongside sublethal colistin doses displayed no additive toxicity. These results indicate that Ω76 can potentially supplement or replace colistin, especially where nephrotoxicity is a concern. To our knowledge, no other existing antibiotics occupy this clinical niche. Mechanistically, Ω76 adopts an α-helical structure in membranes, causing rapid membrane disruption, leakage, and bacterial death.

The effect of direct hemoperfusion with polymyxin B immobilized cartridge on meropenem in critically ill patients requiring renal support

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of direct hemoperfusion with polymyxin B immobilized cartridge (DHP-PMX) on meropenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with sepsis requiring continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After intravenous infusion of 1 g meropenem over 3 h repeated every 8 h for at least 3 doses, 2 serial blood and ultrafiltration fluid samples were collected: one over a dose interval of meropenem with DHP-PMX therapy; and the other on the following day over a dose interval of meropenem with no DHP-PMX therapy. Meropenem concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters of meropenem and extraction ratio of DHP-PMX were calculated.

RESULTS

Mean AUC_0-8 of meropenem on DHP-PMX day was comparable to that of the DHP-PMX free day (285.2 ± 138.2 vs 297.8 ± 130.2 mg ∗ h/L; paired t-test, p = .618). No statistical significance of peak and trough concentrations, volume of distribution, sieving coefficient, or half-life were found. Extraction ratio of DHP-PMX on meropenem was 0 [0-0.03] and clearance by DHP-PMX was 0.04 [0-0.2] L/h which was not considered clinically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant effect of DHP-PMX on meropenem pharmacokinetics was observed among severe sepsis/septic shock patients during CVVH treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Registry detail: NCT registry: 02413541 (First registered March 3, 2015, last update October 16, 2017).

Ex Vivo Characterization of Effects of Renal Replacement Therapy Modalities and Settings on Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem and Vaborbactam

The combination product meropenem-vaborbactam, with activity against KPC-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, is likely to be used during renal replacement therapy. The aim of this work was to describe the extracorporeal removal (adsorption and clearance) of meropenem-vaborbactam during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH).

The combination product meropenem-vaborbactam, with activity against KPC-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, is likely to be used during renal replacement therapy. The aim of this work was to describe the extracorporeal removal (adsorption and clearance) of meropenem-vaborbactam during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). An ex vivo model was used to examine the effects of a matrix of operational settings. Vaborbactam did not adsorb to AN69 (acrylonitrile and sodium methallylsulfonate copolymer) ST100 (surface area, 1 m²) hemofilter; the mean (±standard deviation [SD]) meropenem adsorption was 9% (±1%). The sieving coefficients (mean ± SD) with AN69 ST100 and ST150 (surface area, 1.5 m²) filters ranged from 0.97 ± 0.16 to 1.14 ± 0.12 and from 1.13 ± 0.01 to 1.53 ± 0.28, respectively, for meropenem and from 0.64 ± 0.39 to 0.90 ± 0.14 and 0.78 ± 0.18 to 1.04 ± 0.28, respectively, for vaborbactam. At identical settings, vaborbactam sieving coefficients were 25% to 30% lower than for meropenem. Points of dilution, blood flow rates, or effluent flow rates did not affect sieving coefficients for either drug. However, doubling the effluent flow rate resulted in >50 to 100% increases in filter clearance for both drugs. Postfilter dilution resulted in 40 to 80% increases in filter clearance at a high effluent flow rate (4,000 ml/h), compared with ∼15% increases at a low effluent flow rate (1,000 ml/h) for both drugs. For all combinations of setting and filters tested, vaborbactam clearance was lower than that of meropenem by ∼20 to 40%. Overall, meropenem-vaborbactam is efficiently cleared in CVVH mode.

Beta-lactam carryover in arterial and central venous catheters is negligible

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring is used for aminoglycosides and vancomycin, and has been proposed for β-lactam antibiotics. Clinical blood samples in the ICU are often obtained via an existing vascular catheter rather than fresh needle phlebotomy. If antibiotics had previously been infused through a vascular catheter then used for blood sampling, carryover of antibiotic from the infusion to the sample might result in misleading assessments of target attainment. To address this concern we conducted a series of in vitro measurements of carryover for three commonly used antibiotics.

METHODS

We infused piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, and cefepime at pharmacologic concentrations through commonly used vascular catheters at our hospital and flushed the catheters. We then aspirated warmed citrated bovine blood through each catheter and measured antibiotic concentrations in each aspirate.

RESULTS

Carryover was below the limits of detection for piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, and vancomycin. Cefepime carryover, in contrast, was not negligible and needs to be investigated more fully.

CONCLUSION

Carryover from prior infusions does not appear to jeopardize measurements of piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, or vancomycin in commonly used vascular catheters at our institution. Caution in interpreting samples obtained for cefepime measurements appears advised until more data is available.

Elimination of Meropenem by Continuous Hemo(Dia) Filtration: An in Vitro One-Compartment Model

Meropenem is a carbapenem antibiotic with a wide spectrum of activity against most gram positive and gram negative bacteria including anaerobes. Dose adjustments are necessary during continuous renal replacement therapies of acute renal failure. This in vitro study was conducted to investigate the influence of different filter materials, surface areas (AN-69 0.6 m2 and 0.9 m2, polysulfone 0.75 m2, polyamide 0.6 m2), and increasing flow rates (from 3.3 - 26.7 ml/min) on the elimination of meropenem in an in vitro continuous hemo(dia)filtration model. Meropenem was measured using HPLC with UV-detection. While the clearance increased proportionally to increasing dialysate flow rates in filters with a surface area of 0.9 m2, a peak clearance was reached in the small filters at flow rates of 10.0 ml/min (polyamide 0.6 m2) and 18.3 ml/min (AN-69 0.6 m2), when tested under the same conditions. This indicated incomplete dialysate saturation due to the diminished time available for meropenem to equilibrate with the dialysate solution. No adsorption to either of the tested membranes was detected. Dosage recommendations derived from clinical studies might be appropriate when different filter materials, but similar operational settings of the continuous replacement therapy, are applied. Reduction of the recommended dose might be necessary, when renal replacement therapies with lower flow rates and/or filters with smaller surface areas are carried out.

Dosing optimization of meropenem based on a pharmacokinetic analysis in patients receiving hemodiafiltration and an in vitro model

The purpose of this study was to estimate the in vivo pharmacokinetics of meropenem during intermittent-infusion hemodiafiltration (I-HDF) and clarify its optimal dosage and dosing interval in patients receiving I-HDF. The clearance of meropenem by online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and I-HDF was predicted using an in vitro system and assessed to establish whether the results obtained are applicable to clinical cases. In the in vivo study, the mean volume of distribution (Vd), non-I-HDF clearance (CL_non-I-HDF), and I-HDF clearance (CL_I-HDF) were 15.80 ± 3.59 l, 1.05 ± 0.27 l/h, and 5.78 ± 1.03 l/h. Dosing regimens of 0.25 g once daily for a MIC of 8 μg/ml and of 0.5 g once daily for a MIC of 16 μg/ml achieved 40% T > MIC. In the in vitro and in vivo studies, observed CL_HDF was similar to predictive CL_HDF (= C_f/C_p × (Q_D + Q_SUB)). In conclusion, adjustments to the dose and interval of meropenem were developed based on the presumed susceptibility of pathogens to meropenem in patients receiving I-HDF. We suggest 0.5 g once daily as an appropriate regimen for empirical treatment.

Antibiotic Dosing in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

Appropriate antibiotic dosing is critical to improve outcomes in critically ill patients with sepsis. The addition of continuous renal replacement therapy makes achieving appropriate antibiotic dosing more difficult. The lack of continuous renal replacement therapy standardization results in treatment variability between patients and may influence whether appropriate antibiotic exposure is achieved. The aim of this study was to determine if continuous renal replacement therapy effluent flow rate impacts attaining appropriate antibiotic concentrations when conventional continuous renal replacement therapy antibiotic doses were used. This study used Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the effect of effluent flow rate variance on pharmacodynamic target attainment for cefepime, ceftazidime, levofloxacin, meropenem, piperacillin, and tazobactam. Published demographic and pharmacokinetic parameters for each antibiotic were used to develop a pharmacokinetic model. Monte Carlo simulations of 5000 patients were evaluated for each antibiotic dosing regimen at the extremes of Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines recommended effluent flow rates (20 and 35 mL/kg/h). The probability of target attainment was calculated using antibiotic-specific pharmacodynamic targets assessed over the first 72 hours of therapy. Most conventional published antibiotic dosing recommendations, except for levofloxacin, reach acceptable probability of target attainment rates when effluent rates of 20 or 35 mL/kg/h are used.

Pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

The duration of time for which the serum levels exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is an important pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) parameter correlating with efficacy for the antibiotic, ceftriaxone (CTRX). However, no reports exist regarding the PK or PD in patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). The purpose of this study was to examine the PK and safety of CTRX in patients undergoing CRRT in order to establish safer and more effective regimens.

METHODS

CTRX (1 g once a day) was intravenously administered four or more times to nine patients undergoing CRRT. Blood was collected after administration to measure CTRX concentrations in serum and the filtration fraction of CRRT by high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition to calculating PK parameters from serum CTRX, we (a) estimated by simulation CTRX concentrations when the dose interval was extended to once every 2 or 3 days, (b) calculated CTRX clearance via CRRT from CTRX concentrations in the filtration fraction, and (c) assessed the safety of CTRX use.

RESULTS

Total body clearance and the half-life of CTRX were 7.46 mL/min (mean) and 26.5 h, respectively, in patients undergoing CRRT. CTRX was found in the filtration fraction, and the estimated clearance by CRRT was about 70% of total body clearance. Simulations revealed that even when the dose interval is increased to 2 or 3 days, CTRX would retain its efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that, depending on the condition of patients undergoing CRRT, CTRX could be used safely against pathogens with a CTRX MIC ≤2 µg/mL, even when extending the dose interval.

Pharmacokinetics of Continuous Infusion Meropenem With Concurrent Extracorporeal Life Support and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Case Report

Pharmacokinetic parameters can be significantly altered for both extracorporeal life support (ECLS) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). This case report describes the pharmacokinetics of continuous-infusion meropenem in a patient on ECLS with concurrent CRRT. A 2.8-kg, 10-day-old, full-term neonate born via spontaneous vaginal delivery presented with hypothermia, lethargy, and a ~500-g weight loss from birth. She progressed to respiratory failure on hospital day 2 (HD 2) and developed sepsis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and liver failure as a result of disseminated adenoviral infection. By HD 6, acute kidney injury was evident, with progressive fluid overload >1500 mL (+) for the admission. On HD 6 venoarterial ECLS was instituted for lung protection and fluid removal. On HD 7 she was initiated on CRRT. On HD 12, a blood culture returned positive and subsequently grew Pseudomonas aeruginosa with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for meropenem of 0.25 mg/L. She was started on vancomycin, meropenem, and amikacin. A meropenem bolus of 40 mg/kg was given, followed by a continuous infusion of 10 mg/kg/hr (240 mg/kg/day). On HD 15 (ECLS day 9) a meropenem serum concentration of 21 mcg/mL was obtained, corresponding to a clearance of 7.9 mL/kg/min. Repeat cultures from HDs 13 to 15 (ECLS days 7-9) were sterile. This meropenem regimen was successful in providing a target attainment of 100% for serum concentrations above the MIC for ≥40% of the dosing interval and was associated with a sterilization of blood in this complex patient on concurrent ECLS and CRRT circuits.

Doripenem Treatment during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

Doripenem is a broad-spectrum parenteral carbapenem with enhanced activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. While the initial dosing recommendation for renally competent patients and patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (cRRT) was 500 mg every 8 h (q8h), the dose for renally competent patients was updated to 1 g q8h in June 2012. There are no updated data for the dosing of patients on continuous renal replacement therapy. The original dosing regimen for cRRT patients was based on nonseptic patients, while newer publications chose comparatively low target concentrations for a carbapenem. Thus, there is an urgent need for updated recommendations for dosing during cRRT. In the trial presented here, we included 13 oliguric septic patients undergoing cRRT in an intensive care setting. Five patients each were treated with hemodiafiltration or hemodialysis, while three patients received hemofiltration treatment. All patients received 1 g doripenem every 8 h. Doripenem concentrations in the plasma and ultrafiltrate were measured over 48 h. The mean hemofilter clearance was 36.53 ml/min, and the mean volume of distribution was 59.26 liters. The steady-state trough levels were found at 8.5 mg/liter, with no considerable accumulation. Based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations, we propose a regimen of 1 g q8h, which may be combined with a loading dose of 1.5 to 2 g for critically ill patients. (This study has been registered with EudraCT under registration no. 2009-018010-18 and at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02018939.).

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: Validation of clinical trial simulations

Meropenem is frequently prescribed in critically ill children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). We previously used clinical trial simulations to evaluate dosing regimens of meropenem in this population and reported that a dose of 20 mg/kg every 12 hours optimizes target attainment. Meropenem pharmacokinetics were investigated in this prospective, open-label study to validate our previous in silico predictions. Seven patients received meropenem (13.8-22 mg/kg) administered intravenously every 12 hours as part of standard care. A mean dose of 18.6 mg/kg of meropenem was administered, resulting in a mean peak concentration of 80.1 μg/mL. Meropenem volume of distribution was 0.35 ± 0.085 L/kg. CRRT clearance was 40.2 ± 6.6 mL/(min · 1.73 m(2) ) and accounted for 63.4% of the total clearance of 74.8 ± 36.9 mL/(min · 1.73 m(2) ). Simulations demonstrated that a dose of 20 mg/kg every 12 hours resulted in a time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT > MIC) of 100% in 5 out of 7 subjects, with a %fT > MIC of 93% and 43% in the remaining 2 subjects. We conclude that CRRT contributed significantly to the total clearance of meropenem. A dosing regimen of 20 mg/kg achieved good target attainment in critically ill children receiving CRRT, which is consistent with our previously published in silico predictions.

Comparison of availability and plasma clearance rates of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate delivery in the free acid and calcium salt forms

β-Hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB), a leucine metabolite, has long been supplemented as a Ca salt (Ca-HMB) to increase strength and performance gains with exercise and to reduce recovery time. Recently, the free acid form of HMB (HMB-FA) has become commercially available in capsule form (gelcap). The current study was conducted to compare the bioavailability of HMB using the two commercially available capsule forms of HMB-FA and Ca-HMB. We also compared the pharmacokinetics of each form when administered mixed in water. Ten human subjects (five male and five female) were studied in a randomised crossover design. There was no significant sex by treatment interaction for any of the pharmacokinetic parameters measured. HMB-FA administered in capsules was more efficient than Ca-HMB capsule at HMB delivery with a 37 % increase in plasma clearance rate (74·8 (sem 4·0) v. 54·5 (sem 3·2) ml/min, P<0·0001) and a 76 % increase in peak plasma HMB concentration (270·2 (sem 17·8) v. 153·9 (sem 17·9) μmol/l, P<0·006), which was reached in one-third the time (P<0·009). When HMB-FA and Ca-HMB were administered in water, the differences still favoured HMB-FA, albeit to a lesser degree. Plasma HMB with HMB-FA administered in water was greater during the early phase of absorption (up to 45 min postadministration, P<0·05); this resulted in increased AUC during the first 60 min after administration, when compared with Ca-HMB mixed in water (P<0·03). In conclusion, HMB-FA in capsule form improves clearance rate and availability of HMB compared with Ca-HMB in capsule form.

Meropenem population pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with septic shock and continuous renal replacement therapy: influence of residual diuresis on dose requirements

Meropenem dosing in critically ill patients with septic shock and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is complex, with the recommended maintenance doses being 500 mg to 1,000 mg every 8 h (q8h) to every 12 h. This multicenter study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of meropenem in this population to identify the sources of PK variability and to evaluate different dosing regimens to develop recommendations based on clinical parameters. Thirty patients with septic shock and CRRT receiving meropenem were enrolled (153 plasma samples were tested). A population PK model was developed with data from 24 patients and subsequently validated with data from 6 patients using NONMEM software (v.7.3). The final model was characterized by CL = 3.68 + 0.22 · (residual diuresis/100) and V = 33.00 · (weight/73)(2.07), where CL is total body clearance (in liters per hour), residual diuresis is the volume of residual diuresis (in milliliters per 24 h), and V is the apparent volume of distribution (in liters). CRRT intensity was not identified to be a CL modifier. Monte Carlo simulations showed that to maintain concentrations of the unbound fraction (fu ) of drug above the MIC of the bacteria for 40% of dosing interval T (referred to as 40% of the ƒ uT >MIC), a meropenem dose of 500 mg q8h as a bolus over 30 min would be sufficient regardless of the residual diuresis. If 100% of the ƒ uT >MIC was chosen as the target, oligoanuric patients would require 500 mg q8h as a bolus over 30 min for the treatment of susceptible bacteria (MIC < 2 mg/liter), while patients with preserved diuresis would require the same dose given as an infusion over 3 h. If bacteria with MICs close to the resistance breakpoint (2 to 4 mg/liter) were to be treated with meropenem, a dose of 500 mg every 6 h would be necessary: a bolus over 30 min for oligoanuric patients and an infusion over 3 h for patients with preserved diuresis. Our results suggest that residual diuresis may be an easy and inexpensive tool to help with titration of the meropenem dose and infusion time in this challenging population.

Can we use an ex vivo continuous hemofiltration model to describe the adsorption and elimination of meropenem and piperacillin?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the adsorption and elimination characteristics of meropenem and piperacillin during simulated continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and to compare the observed data from this ex vivo study with previous data from clinical studies.

METHOD

This was an experimental study utilizing a modified CRRT circuit and polysulfone membrane (1.2 m2), circulated with a blood-crystalloid mixture. Adsorption onto the CRRT circuit was tested over a 4-h period, and clearance was assessed separately using variable continuous hemofiltration settings.

RESULTS

A rapid 9% reduction in circulating meropenem and piperacillin concentrations was observed at approximately 0.5 and 1.0 h for each antibiotic, respectively. The post-dilution setting was associated with a significantly higher sieving coefficient (Sc) and filter clearance (CLfilter) (mean ± SD) (Sc 1.14 ± 0.10 versus 1.06 ± 0.04; CLfilter 19.05 ± 1.63 versus 17.59 ± 0.62 ml/min, P values < 0.05) for meropenem. No significant differences were observed for piperacillin pharmacokinetics. Clinically comparable Sc data were observed between data obtained from the ex vivo study and data from previous clinical studies, for both antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Meropenem and piperacillin appear to be rapidly adsorbed into the CRRT circuit, and the delivery site of fluid replacement significantly influences meropenem pharmacokinetics. However, these findings are likely to be clinically insignificant and not affect dosing requirements. This ex vivo method could be a surrogate for future clinical pharmacokinetic studies of CRRT. Further research is required to explore the applicability of the ex vivo method to further characterize antibiotic pharmacokinetics during CRRT.

Antibiotic Dosing in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Renal Replacement Therapy

Continuous renal replacement therapy is frequently used to manage acute renal failure in critically ill patients. Antibiotic drugs used to treat infections in critically ill patients need to be dosed on the basis of the method of renal replacement therapy to be used, degree of residual renal function, and the sensitivity of the organism to be treated. Antibiotic dosing regimens must then be continuously monitored and adjusted according to modifications made to the renal replacement circuit and the patient’s underlying condition.

A multicenter study on the effect of continuous hemodiafiltration intensity on antibiotic pharmacokinetics

Introduction

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may alter antibiotic pharmacokinetics and increase the risk of incorrect dosing. In a nested cohort within a large randomized controlled trial, we assessed the effect of higher (40 mL/kg per hour) and lower (25 mL/kg per hour) intensity CRRT on antibiotic pharmacokinetics.

Methods

We collected serial blood samples to measure ciprofloxacin, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and vancomycin levels. We calculated extracorporeal clearance (CL), systemic CL, and volume of distribution (Vd) by non-linear mixed-effects modelling. We assessed the influence of CRRT intensity and other patient factors on antibiotic pharmacokinetics.

Results

We studied 24 patients who provided 179 pairs of samples. Extracorporeal CL increased with higher-intensity CRRT but the increase was significant for vancomycin only (mean 28 versus 22 mL/minute; P = 0.0003). At any given prescribed CRRT effluent rate, extracorporeal CL of individual antibiotics varied widely, and the effluent-to-plasma concentration ratio decreased with increasing effluent flow. Overall, systemic CL varied to a greater extent than Vd, particularly for meropenem, piperacillin, and tazobactam, and large intra-individual differences were also observed. CRRT dose did not influence overall (systemic) CL, Vd, or half-life. The proportion of systemic CL due to CRRT varied widely and was high in some cases.

Conclusions

In patients receiving CRRT, there is great variability in antibiotic pharmacokinetics, which complicates an empiric approach to dosing and suggests the need for therapeutic drug monitoring. More research is required to investigate the apparent relative decrease in clearance at higher CRRT effluent rates.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00221013. Registered 14 September 2005.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0818-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

How can we ensure effective antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients receiving different types of renal replacement therapy?

Determining appropriate antibiotic dosing for critically ill patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) is complex. Worldwide unstandardized and heterogeneous prescribing of RRT as well as altered patient physiology and pathogen susceptibility all cause drug disposition to be much different to that seen in non-critically ill patients. Significant changes to pharmacokinetic parameters, including volume of distribution and clearance, could be expected, in particular, for antibiotics that are hydrophilic with low plasma protein binding and that are usually primarily eliminated by the renal system. Antibiotic clearance is likely to be significantly increased when higher RRT intensities are used. The combined effect of these factors that alter antibiotic disposition is that non-standard dosing strategies should be considered to achieve therapeutic exposure. In particular, an aggressive early approach to dosing should be considered and this may include administration of a 'loading dose', to rapidly achieve therapeutic concentrations and maximally reduce the inoculum of the pathogen. This approach is particularly important given the pharmacokinetic changes in the critically ill as well as the increased likelihood of less susceptible pathogens. Dose individualization that applies knowledge of the RRT and patient factors causing altered pharmacokinetics remains the key approach for ensuring effective antibiotic therapy for these patients. Where possible, therapeutic drug monitoring should also be used to ensure more accurate therapy. A lack of pharmacokinetic data for antibiotics during the prolonged intermittent RRT and intermittent hemodialysis currently limits evidence-based antibiotic dose recommendations for these patients.

Meropenem in children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: clinical trial simulations using realistic covariates

Meropenem is frequently prescribed in children receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Fluid overload is often present in critically ill children and affects drug disposition. The purpose of this study was to develop a pharmacokinetic model to (1) evaluate target attainment of meropenem dosing regimens against P. aeruginosa in children receiving CRRT and (2) estimate the effect of fluid overload on target attainment. Clinical trial simulations were employed to evaluate target attainment of meropenem in various age groups and degrees of fluid overload in children receiving CRRT. Pharmacokinetic parameters were extracted from published literature, and 287 patients from the prospective pediatric CRRT registry database provided realistic clinical covariates including patient weight, fluid overload, and CRRT prescription characteristics. Target attainment at 40% and 75% time above the minimum inhibitory concentration was evaluated. Clinical trial simulations demonstrated that children greater than 5 years of age achieved acceptable target attainment with a dosing regimen of 20 mg/kg every 12 hours. In children less than 5, however, increased dosing of 20 mg/kg every 8 hours was needed to optimize target attainment. Fluid overload did not affect target attainment. These in silico model predictions will need to be verified in vivo in children receiving meropenem and CRRT.

Beta-lactam dosing in critically ill patients with septic shock and continuous renal replacement therapy

Although early and appropriate antibiotic therapy remains the most important intervention for successful treatment of septic shock, data guiding optimization of beta-lactam prescription in critically ill patients prescribed with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are still limited. Being small hydrophilic molecules, beta-lactams are likely to be cleared by CRRT to a significant extent. As a result, additional variability may be introduced to the per se variable antibiotic concentrations in critically ill patients. This article aims to describe the current clinical scenario for beta-lactam dosing in critically ill patients with septic shock and CRRT, to highlight the sources of variability among the different studies that reduce extrapolation to clinical practice, and to identify the opportunities for future research and improvement in this field. Three frequently prescribed beta-lactams (meropenem, piperacillin and ceftriaxone) were chosen for review. Our findings showed that present dosing recommendations are based on studies with drawbacks limiting their applicability in the clinical setting. In general, current antibiotic dosing regimens for CRRT follow a one-size-fits-all fashion despite emerging clinical data suggesting that drug clearance is partially dependent on CRRT modality and intensity. Moreover, some studies pool data from heterogeneous populations with CRRT that may exhibit different pharmacokinetics (for example, admission diagnoses different to septic shock, such as trauma), which also limit their extrapolation to critically ill patients with septic shock. Finally, there is still no consensus regarding the %T_>MIC (percentage of dosing interval when concentration of the antibiotic is above the minimum inhibitory concentration of the pathogen) value that should be chosen as the pharmacodynamic target for antibiotic therapy in patients with septic shock and CRRT. For empirically optimized dosing, during the first day a loading dose is required to compensate the increased volume of distribution, regardless of impaired organ function. An additional loading dose may be required when CRRT is initiated due to steady-state equilibrium breakage driven by clearance variation. From day 2, dosing must be adjusted to CRRT settings and residual renal function. Therapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactams may be regarded as a useful tool to daily individualize dosing and to ensure optimal antibiotic exposure.

[Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects in antibiotic treatment]

Severe sepsis and septic shock have a high mortality and, therefore require fast and effective antibiotic treatment with low toxicity. Because of sepsis-induced pathophysiological changes, pharmacokinetics of antimicrobial agents can be altered. Particularly water-soluble drugs display an enhanced volume of distribution during early sepsis. Therefore high loading doses are necessary. Renal clearance can also be increased at this time. Later on, organ damage frequently occurs resulting in delayed drug elimination which requires further dose adjustment. The different classes of antibiotics differ in their relevant pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target parameters. Thus, the efficacy of an antimicrobial agent can depend on its concentration, on the exposure time, and on the total exposure as expressed by the area under the time-concentration curve. During treatment with time-dependent antibiotics (e.g. β-lactams), their concentration should be maintained above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) warranting more frequent administration or continuous infusion. For concentration dependent agents (e.g. aminoglycosides), the single dose is pivotal, whereas the dosage interval can be extended. Drug-drug interactions involving antibiotics are mainly caused by inhibition of their metabolism, particularly of cytochrome P 450 iso-enzymes, or by additive toxic effects. They can result in severe complications such as renal failure or ventricular arrhythmias. Conversely, enzyme induction may lead to subtherapeutic drug levels. When continuous renal replacement therapy is required, the dosage of antibiotics has to be adapted according to the results of respective pharmacokinetic studies.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of cidofovir in continuous venovenous hemofiltration

Dosage recommendations for cidofovir are available for renally competent as well as impaired patients; however, there are no data for patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy. We determined the single-dose concentration-versus-time profile of cidofovir in a critically ill patient undergoing continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). One dose of 450 mg cidofovir (5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously due to a proven cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and failure of first-line antiviral therapy. Additionally, 2 g of probenecid was administered orally 3 h prior to and 1 g was administered 2 h as well as 8 h after completion of the infusion. The concentrations of cidofovir in serum and ultrafiltrate were assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography. The peak serum concentration measured at 60 min postinfusion was 28.01 mg/liter at the arterial port. The trough serum level was 19.33 mg/liter at the arterial port after 24 h. The value of the area under the concentration-versus-time curve from 0 to 24 h was 543.8 mg·h/liter. The total body clearance was 2.46 ml/h/kg, and the elimination half-life time was 53.32 h. The sieving coefficient was 0.138±0.022. Total removal of the drug was 30.99% after 24 h. Because of these data, which give us a rough idea of the concentration profile of cidofovir in patients undergoing CVVH, a toxic accumulation of the drug following repeated doses may be expected. Further trials have to be done to determine the right dosage of cidofovir in patients undergoing CVVH to avoid toxic accumulation of the drug.

Does Beta-lactam Pharmacokinetic Variability in Critically Ill Patients Justify Therapeutic Drug Monitoring? A Systematic Review

The pharmacokinetics of beta-lactam antibiotics in intensive care patients may be profoundly altered due to the dynamic, unpredictable pathophysiological changes that occur in critical illness. For many drugs, significant increases in the volume of distribution and/or variability in drug clearance are common. When “standard” beta-lactam doses are used, such pharmacokinetic changes can result in subtherapeutic plasma concentrations, treatment failure, and the development of antibiotic resistance. Emerging data support the use of beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and individualized dosing to ensure the achievement of pharmacodynamic targets associated with rapid bacterial killing and optimal clinical outcomes. The purpose of this work was to describe the pharmacokinetic variability of beta-lactams in the critically ill and to discuss the potential utility of TDM to optimize antibiotic therapy through a structured literature review of all relevant publications between 1946 and October 2011. Only a few studies have reported the utility of TDM as a tool to improve beta-lactam dosing in critically ill patients. Moreover, there is little agreement between studies on the pharmacodynamic targets required to optimize antibiotic therapy. The impact of TDM on important clinical outcomes also remains to be established. Whereas TDM may be theoretically rational, clinical studies to assess utility in the clinical setting are urgently required.

[Dosage of antipseudomonal antibiotics in patients with acute kidney injury subjected to continuous renal replacement therapies]

Critically ill patients are often affected by infections produced by Pseudomonas, which can be a cause of sepsis and renal failure. Early and adequate antibiotic treatment at correct dosage levels is crucial. Acute kidney injury is also frequent in critically ill patients. In those patients who require renal replacement therapy, continuous techniques are gaining relevance as filtering alternatives to intermittent hemodialysis. It must be taken into account that many antibiotics are largely cleared by continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT). The aim of this review is to assess the clinical evidence on the pharmacokinetics and dosage recommendations of the main antibiotic groups used to treat Pseudomonas spp. infections in critically ill patients subjected to CRRT.

Effect of hemopurification rate on doripenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients receiving high-flow continuous hemodiafiltration

  Hemopurification is an effective therapy for acute kidney injury, defined as creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min, which occurs frequently in the intensive care unit. These critically ill patients often have severe infectious complications and are thus often treated with antibiotics. However, the effect of hemopurification on the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics is not well understood. In this study, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of doripenem (DRPM) in critically ill patients with accompanying renal dysfunction undergoing continuous hemodiafiltration by high-volume filtration/high-flow dialysis (high-flow CHDF) and compared it to the pharmacokinetics of DRPM during conventional CHDF. We studied 8 patients (2 in the high-flow group and 6 in the conventional group) in whom DRPM was administered while performing CHDF for acute kidney injury. DRPM (250 mg) was intravenously infused over 1 h. For the conventional group, CHDF was performed at a blood flow rate (Q(B)) of 100 ml/min, dialysate flow rate (Q(D)) of 500 ml/h, and filtration flow rate (Q(F)) of 300 ml/h. For the high-flow group, CHDF was performed at a blood flow rate (Q(B)) of 100 ml/min, dialysate flow rate (Q(D)) of 1500 ml/h, and filtration flow rate (Q(F)) of 900 ml/h. For both groups, a polysulfonehemofilter with a membrane area of 1.0 m(2) was used. Mean half-life, total body clearance, and clearance via hemodiafiltration of DRPM were 2.9 h, 118 ml/min, and 41.9 ml/min, respectively, in the high-flow group, and 7.9 h, 58 ml/min, and 13.5 ml/min in the conventional group. Clearance via hemodiafiltration increased approximately 3-fold by tripling the hemopurification rate. Therefore, CHDF parameters greatly affected DRPM pharmacokinetics in patients receiving CHDF. These results suggest that clearance via hemodiafiltration increases proportionally to the hemopurification rate. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that DRPM dose must be increased to 1.0-1.5 g/day when performing high-flow CHDF.

Quality of pharmacokinetic studies in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the preferred renal replacement therapy modality in the critically ill. We aimed to reveal the literature on the pharmacokinetic studies in critically ill patients receiving CRRT with special reference to quality assessment of these studies and the CRRT dose. We conducted a systematic review by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases to December 2009 and bibliographies of relevant review articles. We included original studies reporting from critically ill adult subjects receiving CRRT because of acute kidney injury with a special emphasis on drug pharmacokinetics. We used the minimum reporting criteria for CRRT studies by Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) and, second, the Downs and Black checklist to assess the quality of the studies. We calculated the CRRT dose per study. We included pharmacokinetic parameters, residual renal function, and recommendations on drug dosing. Of 182 publications, 95 were considered relevant and 49 met the inclusion criteria. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] number of reported criteria by ADQI was 7.0 (5.0-8.0) of 12. The median (IQR) Downs and Black quality score was 15 (14-16) of 32. None of the publications reported CRRT dose directly. The median (IQR) weighted CRRT dose was 23.7 (18.8-27.9) ml/kg/h. More attention should be paid both to standardizing the CRRT dose and reporting of the CRRT parameters in pharmacokinetic studies. The general quality of the studies during CRRT in the critically ill was only moderate and would be greatly improved by reports in concordant with the ADQI recommendations.

Recommended β-lactam regimens are inadequate in septic patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy

Introduction

Sepsis is responsible for important alterations in the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), which is commonly used in septic patients, may further contribute to pharmacokinetic changes. Current recommendations for antibiotic doses during CRRT combine data obtained from heterogeneous patient populations in which different CRRT devices and techniques have been used. We studied whether these recommendations met optimal pharmacokinetic criteria for broad-spectrum antibiotic levels in septic shock patients undergoing CRRT.

Methods

This open, prospective study enrolled consecutive patients treated with CRRT and receiving either meropenem (MEM), piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), cefepime (FEP) or ceftazidime (CAZ). Serum concentrations of these antibiotics were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography from samples taken before (t = 0) and 1, 2, 5, and 6 or 12 hours (depending on the β-lactam regimen) after the administration of each antibiotic. Series of measurements were separated into those taken during the early phase (< 48 hours from the first dose) of therapy and those taken later (> 48 hours).

Results

A total of 69 series of serum samples were obtained in 53 patients (MEM, n = 17; TZP, n = 16; FEP, n = 8; CAZ, n = 12). Serum concentrations remained above four times the minimal inhibitory concentration for Pseudomonas spp. for the recommended time in 81% of patients treated with MEM, in 71% with TZP, in 53% with CAZ and in 0% with FEP. Accumulation after 48 hours of treatment was significant only for MEM.

Conclusions

In septic patients receiving CRRT, recommended doses of β-lactams for Pseudomonas aeruginosa are adequate for MEM but not for TZP, FEP and CAZ; for these latter drugs, higher doses and/or extended infusions should be used to optimise serum concentrations.

Free acid gel form of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) improves HMB clearance from plasma in human subjects compared with the calcium HMB salt

The leucine metabolite, β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB), is a nutritional supplement that increases lean muscle and strength with exercise and in disease states. HMB is presently available as the Ca salt (CaHMB). The present study was designed to examine whether HMB in free acid gel form will improve HMB availability to tissues. Two studies were conducted and in each study four males and four females were given three treatments in a randomised, cross-over design. Treatments were CaHMB (gelatin capsule, 1 g), equivalent HMB free acid gel swallowed (FASW) and free acid gel held sublingual for 15 s then swallowed (FASL). Plasma HMB was measured for 3 h following treatment in study 1 and 24 h with urine collection in study 2. In both the studies, the times to peak plasma HMB were 128 (sem 11), 38 (sem 4) and 38 (sem 1) min (P < 0·0001) for CaHMB, FASW and FASL, respectively. The peak concentrations were 131 (sem 6), 249 (sem 14) and 239 (sem 14) μmol/l (P < 0·0001) for CaHMB, FASW and FASL, respectively. The areas under the curve were almost double for FASW and FASL (P < 0·0001). Daily urinary HMB excretion was not significantly increased resulting in more HMB retained (P < 0·003) with FASW and FASL. Half-lives were 3·17 (sem 0·22), 2·50 (sem 0·13) and 2·51 (sem 0·14) h for CaHMB, FASW and FASL, respectively (P < 0·004). Free acid gel resulted in quicker and greater plasma concentrations (+185 %) and improved clearance (+25 %) of HMB from plasma. In conclusion, HMB free acid gel could improve HMB availability and efficacy to tissues in health and disease.

Meropenem dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis receiving high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration

Use of high ultrafiltrate flow rates with continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVHF) in critically ill patients is an emerging setting, for which there are few data to guide drug dosing. The objectives of this study were, firstly, to investigate the pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with severe sepsis who are receiving high-volume CVVHF with high-volume exchanges (> or = 4 liters/h); secondly, to determine whether standard dosing regimens (1,000 mg intravenously [i.v.] every 8 h) are sufficient for treatment of less susceptible organisms such as Burkholderia pseudomallei (MIC, 4 mg/liter); and, finally, to compare the clearances observed in this study with data from previous studies using lower-volume exchanges (1 to 2 liters/h). We recruited 10 eligible patients and collected serial pre- and postfilter blood samples and ultrafiltrate and urine samples. A noncompartmental method was used to determine meropenem pharmacokinetics. The cohort had a median age of 56.6 years, a median weight of 70 kg, and a median APACHE II (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) score of 25. The median (interquartile range) values for meropenem were as follows: terminal elimination half-life, 4.3 h (2.9 to 6.0); terminal volume of distribution, 0.2 liters/kg (0.2 to 0.3); trough concentration, 7.7 mg/liter (6.2 to 12.9); total clearance, 6.0 liters/h (5.2 to 6.2); hemofiltration clearance, 3.5 liters/h (3.4 to 3.9). In comparing the meropenem clearance here with those in previous studies, ultrafiltration flow rate was found to be the parameter that accounted for the differences in clearance of meropenem (R(2) = 0.89). In conclusion, high-volume CVVHF causes significant clearance of meropenem, necessitating steady-state doses of 1,000 mg every 8 h to maintain sufficient concentrations to treat less susceptible organisms such as B. pseudomallei.

The impact of continuous renal replacement therapy on drug therapy

Critically ill patients with multisystem organ failure often require daily administration of large volumes of fluid to provide electrolyte and nutrition support, medications, and blood products. This often results in fluid overload, which has historically been managed with intermittent hemodialysis (IHD). Unfortunately, IHD entails a high rate of fluid and solute removal that often exacerbates hemodynamic instability. Accordingly, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), involving slow and continuous removal of water and solutes from the plasma, is currently preferred for managing these patients.

Ertapenem clearance during modeled continuous renal replacement therapy

PURPOSE

To determine ertapenem transmembrane clearance (CLtm) during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) using a validated in vitro model.

METHODS

Ertapenem clearance during continuous hemofiltration and hemodialysis was assessed with AN69 and polysulfone hemodiafilters at 4 dialysate (Qd) and ultrafiltration rates (Quf): 1, 2, 3, and 6 l/hour. Blood and dialysate samples were collected at each flow rate and assayed for urea (control solute) and ertapenem concentrations. The experiment was repeated 5 times for each hemodiafilter type. Ertapenem and urea sieving coefficient (SC) and saturation coefficient (SA) were assessed, and CLtm calculated.

RESULTS

In continuous hemofiltration mode, urea and ertapenem SC ranged from 1.00 to 1.19 at all Quf and did not differ between hemodiafilter types. Consequently, convective CLtm also did not differ between hemodiafilters. In continuous dialysis mode, urea Cltm did not differ between hemodiafilter types at any Qd. However, ertapenem SA and CLtm were significantly different between hemodiafilter types at Qd 6l/hour (p<0.001). As Qd increased, mean +/- SD AN69 SA declined significantly from 0.87 +/- 0.12 at Qd 1 l/hour to 0.45 +/- 0.02 at Qd 6 l/hour (p<0.001). Ertapenem SA did not differ at any Qd with the polysulfone hemodiafilter (range 0.71-0.80).

CONCLUSION

Ertapenem was cleared substantially in these in vitro CRRT models. However, our findings illustrate discordance between our observed SC and SA and the published unbound fraction of ertapenem. This finding has been reported with many other drugs, including carbapenem antibiotics. If in vivo studies corroborate our SA and SC findings, dosage adjustment for patients receiving CRRT will be required.

Dosing Regimes for Antimicrobials during Continuous Veno-Venous Haemofiltration (CVVH)

The pharmacokinetic profile of antibiotics used in critically ill patients during continuous haemofiltration is different both from healthy people and from stable patients on long-term dialysis. This article reviews the patient-related, drug-related and haemofiltration-related variables influencing drug elimination in this group of patients, and provides specific recommendations for antibiotic dosing for different classes of antibiotics. Loading doses do not need to be altered. Subsequent dose adjustment should be based on the estimated ultrafiltration capacity of the renal replacement technique and the degree of extracorporeal clearance. A table of recommended doses is provided.

Dosing of antimicrobial agents in critically-ill patients with acute kindey injury and continuous venvenous haemofiltration

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the general guidelines for drug dosing in critically-ill patients with acute kidney injury and continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH), and to discuss whether the predicted dose adjustment is an as reliable estimate than one based on observed data, considering the recent literature.

METHODS

Literature search was done in PubMed database for human studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically-ill patients receiving CVVH, dosing of antibiotics based on the predicted clearances yield rough estimates. Because of interpatient variability observed in the clearance of many antibiotics, monitoring of plasma concentration is highly recommended whenever possible, and especially for those antibiotics that are eliminated predominantly by the kidney, and that have a low therapeutic threshold such as aminoglycosides and glycopeptides, or in patients requiring protracted treatment. However, for many antibiotics, monitoring of blood concentrations is not routinely available and adequate concentrations can only be inferred from clinical response. Therefore, it is important to realize that among many other causes, failure to respond within the first few days of antibiotic treatment may be due to inadequate dosing.