Comparison of the effects of liposomal amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B on propafenone metabolism and hepatic cytochrome P-450 in rats

A review on new natural and synthetic anti-leishmanial chemotherapeutic agents and current perspective of treatment approaches

Leishmaniases are considered among the most neglected yet dangerous parasitic diseases worldwide. According to the recent WHO report (Weekly Epidemiological Record, Sep, 2021), 200 countries and territories reported leishmanises cases in 2020; of which 89 (45%) for CL, and 79 (40%) for VL were endemic. Indian subcontinent (India, Bangladesh and Nepal), one of the three eco-epidemiological hotspots of VL, currently reported 18% of the total cases of VL worldwide. Eastern Mediterranean region and the Region of the Americas together reported >90% of the new CL cases, of which >80% were from Afghanistan, Algeria, Brazil, Colombia, Iraq, Pakistan and the Syrian Arab Republic. While considering the current therapeutic options, conventional anti-leishmanial drugs have long been proved to be toxic and/or expensive and have resulted in extensive drug resistance in India. Recent searches for novel anti-leishmanial drugs have led to find out the prime cellular targets and metabolic pathways to bridge the gap between the known facts and unexplored data. Cutting edge knowledge based drug designing has simplified the search for novel molecules with leishmanicidal efficacy by identifying ligand-receptor interactions and has accelerated the cost effective primary discovery of molecules through computational validation against Leishmaniases. This review focuses on the limitations of conventional drugs, and discusses the chemotherapeutic potential of many novel natural and synthetic anti-leishmanial agents reported since the last decade. It is also interpreted that some of the reported molecules might be tested singly or as a part of combinatorial therapy on pre-clinical and clinical level.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Systemically Administered Antileishmanial Drugs

This review describes the pharmacokinetic properties of the systemically administered antileishmanial drugs pentavalent antimony, paromomycin, pentamidine, miltefosine and amphotericin B (AMB), including their absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion and potential drug–drug interactions. This overview provides an understanding of their clinical pharmacokinetics, which could assist in rationalising and optimising treatment regimens, especially in combining multiple antileishmanial drugs in an attempt to increase efficacy and shorten treatment duration. Pentavalent antimony pharmacokinetics are characterised by rapid renal excretion of unchanged drug and a long terminal half-life, potentially due to intracellular conversion to trivalent antimony. Pentamidine is the only antileishmanial drug metabolised by cytochrome P450 enzymes. Paromomycin is excreted by the kidneys unchanged and is eliminated fastest of all antileishmanial drugs. Miltefosine pharmacokinetics are characterized by a long terminal half-life and extensive accumulation during treatment. AMB pharmacokinetics differ per drug formulation, with a fast renal and faecal excretion of AMB deoxylate but a much slower clearance of liposomal AMB resulting in an approximately ten-fold higher exposure. AMB and pentamidine pharmacokinetics have never been evaluated in leishmaniasis patients. Studies linking exposure to effect would be required to define target exposure levels in dose optimisation but have only been performed for miltefosine. Limited research has been conducted on exposure at the drug’s site of action, such as skin exposure in cutaneous leishmaniasis patients after systemic administration. Pharmacokinetic data on special patient populations such as HIV co-infected patients are mostly lacking. More research in these areas will help improve clinical outcomes by informed dosing and combination of drugs.

Amphotericin B-copper(II) complex shows improved therapeutic index in vitro

The AmB-Cu(II) complex has recently been reported as an antifungal agent with reduced aggregation of AmB in aqueous solutions, increased anti C. albicans activity and lower toxicity against human cells in vitro. In the present work, investigations of the activity of the AmB-Cu (II) complex against fungal pathogens with varying susceptibility, including C. albicans and C. parapsilosis strains and intrinsically resistant A. niger, and cytotoxicity in normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) in vitro were performed. For better understanding of the mechanism of reduced cytotoxicity and increased fungicidal activity, the influence of the AmB-Cu (II) complex on membrane integrity and accumulation of cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mitochondrial superoxide was compared with that of conventional AmB. In the sensitive C. albicans and C. parapsilosis strains, the AmB-Cu(II) complex showed higher fungicidal activity (the MIC value was 0.35-0.7μg/ml for the AmB-Cu (II) complex, and 0.45-0.9μg/ml for Fungizone) due to increased induction of oxidative damage with rapid inhibition of the ability to reduce tetrazolium dye (MTT). In the NHDF cell line, the CC₅₀ value was 30.13±1.53μg/ml for the AmB-Cu(II) complex and 17.46±1.24μg/ml for (Fungizone), therefore, the therapeutic index (CC₅₀/MIC₉₀) determined in vitro was 86.09-43.04 for the AmB-Cu(II) complex and 38.80-19.40 for Fungizone. The lower cytotoxicity of the AmB-Cu(II) complex in human cells resulted from lower accumulation of cellular and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. This phenomenon was probably caused by the induction of successful antioxidant defense of the cells. The mechanism of the reduced cytotoxicity of the AmB-Cu(II) complex needs further investigation, but the preliminary results are very promising.

Antifungal Activity of Amphotericin B Conjugated to Nanosized Magnetite in the Treatment of Paracoccidioidomycosis

This study reports on in vitro and in vivo tests that sought to assess the antifungal activity of a newly developed magnetic carrier system comprising amphotericin B loaded onto the surface of pre-coated (with a double-layer of lauric acid) magnetite nanoparticles. The in vitro tests compared two drugs; i.e., this newly developed form and free amphotericin B. We found that this nanocomplex exhibited antifungal activity without cytotoxicity to human urinary cells and with low cytotoxicity to peritoneal macrophages. We also evaluated the efficacy of the nanocomplex in experimental paracoccidioidomycosis. BALB/c mice were intratracheally infected with Paracoccidioides brasiliensis and treated with the compound for 30 or 60 days beginning the day after infection. The newly developed amphotericin B coupled with magnetic nanoparticles was effective against experimental paracoccidioidomycosis, and it did not induce clinical, biochemical or histopathological alterations. The nanocomplex also did not induce genotoxic effects in bone marrow cells. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that amphotericin B coupled to magnetic nanoparticles and stabilized with bilayer lauric acid is a promising nanotool for the treatment of the experimental paracoccidioidomycosis because it exhibited antifungal activity that was similar to that of free amphotericin B, did not induce adverse effects in therapeutic doses and allowed for a reduction in the number of applications.

Lung fungal infections are caused by pathogens inhaled as spores which convert into invasive yeast forms in the lungs. This type of infection can spread to other sites in the body through the blood and lymphatic systems, sometimes leading to ulcerations and skin lesions. The drug of choice for treatment is Amphotericin B (AmB). AmB is a typical polyene with broad-spectrum antifungal activity that encounters some use limitations because of its side effects. We developed a magnetic carrier nanocomplex comprising of amphotericin B loaded onto the surface of magnetite nanoparticles pre-coated with a double-layer of lauric acid. We evaluated this approach for its antifungal activity against Paracoccidioides brasiliensis (strain Pb18) and its cytotoxicity in mammalian cell culture. We found that this nanocomplex exhibited antifungal activity without cytotoxicity to human urinary cells and low cytotoxicity to peritoneal macrophages. In vivo, the nanocomplex did not induce genotoxic effects in bone marrow cells and was effective against experimental paracoccidioidomycosis without inducing clinical, biochemical or histopathological alterations.

DDPH, a novel antihypertensive agent, is a potential dual inhibitor of hepatic CYP2D and CYP3A

DDPH (1-(2, 6-dimethylphenoxy)-2-(3, 4-dimethoxyphenylethylamino) propane hydrochloride) is a promising novel antihypertensive agent, with potent antihypertensive, neuroprotective and cardioprotective effects. This study aimed to investigate the effects of DDPH on the expression and activity of hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms and evaluate the metabolic drug-drug interactions of DDPH with propafenone. Our results showed that orally administered DDPH (12.5-50 mg/kg/d) for 7 days significantly inhibited CYP2D1 and CYP3A1 activity and mRNA and protein expression but weakly increased CYP1A2 activity and expression in rats. Enzyme kinetics studies showed that DDPH was a competitive inhibitor of CYP2D1 and mixed inhibitor of CYP3A1 in rat liver microsomes with Ki values of 3.70 ± 0.42 μM and 4.79 ± 1.10 μM respectively. With human liver microsomes, DDPH was a noncompetitive inhibitor of CYP2D6 (Ki = 0.85 ± 0.06 μM) and mixed inhibitor of CYP3A (Ki = 2.15 ± 0.41 μM). Further in vivo study showed that oral administration of DDPH (12.5-50 mg/kg/d) for 7 days in rats significantly increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of propafenone by 25.4%-63.9%, with a concomitant decrease in the plasma clearance. In conclusion, the results indicated that DDPH inhibited CYP2D and CYP3A activities and down-regulated their protein expression and mRNA transcription. DDPH might cause metabolic drug-drug interactions through modulation of the activity and expression of CYP2D and CYP3A. This information could be important in the prediction of possible drug-drug interactions as well as for the effective therapy and the limitation of toxicity of DDPH in clinical practice.

Evaluation of amphotericin B and chloramphenicol as alternative drugs for treatment of chytridiomycosis and their impacts on innate skin defenses

Chytridiomycosis, an amphibian skin disease caused by the emerging fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, has been implicated in catastrophic global amphibian declines. The result is an alarming decrease in amphibian diversity that is a great concern for the scientific community. Clinical trials testing potential antifungal drugs are needed to identify alternative treatments for amphibians infected with this pathogen. In this study, we quantified the MICs of chloramphenicol (800 μg/ml), amphotericin B (0.8 to 1.6 μg/ml), and itraconazole (Sporanox) (20 ng/ml) against B. dendrobatidis. Both chloramphenicol and amphotericin B significantly reduced B. dendrobatidis infection in naturally infected southern leopard frogs (Rana [Lithobates] sphenocephala), although neither drug was capable of complete fungal clearance. Long-term exposure of R. sphenocephala to these drugs did not inhibit antimicrobial peptide (AMP) synthesis, indicating that neither drug is detrimental to this important innate skin defense. However, we observed that chloramphenicol, but not amphotericin B or itraconazole, inhibited the growth of multiple R. sphenocephala skin bacterial isolates in vitro at concentrations below the MIC against B. dendrobatidis. These results indicate that treatment with chloramphenicol might dramatically alter the protective natural skin microbiome when used as an antifungal agent. This study represents the first examination of the effects of alternative antifungal drug treatments on amphibian innate skin defenses, a crucial step to validating these treatments for practical applications.

Antifungals in systemic neonatal candidiasis

Fungal infections are common in the newborn period, especially among premature neonates, and are responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality. Currently, three classes of antifungals are commonly used in the treatment of systemic fungal infections in neonates: the polyene macrolides (e.g. amphotericin B [deoxycholate and lipid preparations]); the azoles (e.g. fluconazole); and the fluorinated pyrimidines (e.g. flucytosine). The echinocandins (e.g. caspofungin and micafungin) are a newer class of antifungals which shows promise in this population.The available kinetic data on amphotericin B deoxycholate in neonates are derived from very small studies and exhibit considerable variability. There are no kinetic data available for the use of lipid preparations in this population and, again, much has been inferred from adult studies. The information available for flucytosine is also limited but appears similar to what is observed in adults. Fluconazole has the most neonatal pharmacokinetic data, which show slightly less variability than the other antifungals. Genomic factors which affect the metabolism of amphotericin B and fluconazole may explain some of the observed variability. Most of the data for the efficacy of antifungal drugs in neonates are derived from retrospective studies and case reports. The data for amphotericin B deoxycholate and flucytosine are limited. There are more data for the liposomal and lipid complex preparations of amphotericin B and for fluconazole in this population. These support the use of these drugs in neonates, but because of their largely noncomparative nature they can not define the optimal dosage or duration of therapy. Amphotericin B deoxycholate is primarily nephrotoxic. It also induces electrolyte abnormalities and is to a lesser degree cardiotoxic. This toxicity in neonates appears similar to published data in older children and adults. While the lipid preparations of amphotericin B owe their existence to a presumed decrease in toxicity, the observed toxicity in neonates appears to be equal to that seen with the deoxycholate, although it should be noted that the lipid preparations are usually given at much higher dosages. Fluconazole toxicity appears to be milder and less frequent in this population than is seen with amphotericin B. In the final analysis, we do not have sufficient data to define the pharmacokinetic profiles, optimal dose or duration of therapy, or toxicity for any of these compounds in neonates. Further studies are necessary if the optimisation of antifungal therapy in this population is to continue.

Amphotericin B and liver function

Amphotericin B is well established as a highly efficacious agent against systemic fungal infections in humans. The therapeutic potential of amphotericin B is limited due to its side effects. Although in clinical use for more than 35 years, impairment of liver function is not considered to be a typical adverse effect of amphotericin B. Experimental data suggest that the drug may interfere with the hepatic cytochrome P450 and may thus influence the metabolic capacity of the liver. A confirmation of such a finding in patients treated with amphotericin B would be of value. The incidence of severe acute or subacute hepatotoxicity in response to amphotericin B is very low. Frequently, in critically ill patients, it is not always clear whether liver abnormalities are caused by an antifungal agent or whether they are due to the critical condition of these patients. Nevertheless, there are experimental data suggesting that amphotericin B may influence the metabolic capacity of the liver. Accordingly, drug interactions during prolonged amphotericin B treatment seem possible. Careful monitoring of liver function in those patients receiving amphotericin B in combination with other drugs, which undergo hepatic metabolism or are potentially hepatotoxic, is recommended. In this review, the current understanding and knowledge of the clinical significance, detection, and possible pathogenesis of amphotericin-B-induced liver damage are presented. With respect to the current experimental data, the influence of the drug on the hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 are also presented and discussed, as is the impact of several clinical studies using different amphotericin B formulas in humans.

Pharmacokinetics, excretion, and mass balance of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) and amphotericin B deoxycholate in humans

The pharmacokinetics, excretion, and mass balance of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) (liposomal AMB) and the conventional formulation, AMB deoxycholate (AMB-DOC), were compared in a phase IV, open-label, parallel study in healthy volunteers. After a single 2-h infusion of 2 mg of liposomal AMB/kg of body weight or 0.6 mg of AMB-DOC/kg, plasma, urine, and feces were collected for 168 h. The concentrations of AMB were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (plasma, urine, feces) or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (plasma). Infusion-related side effects similar to those reported in patients, including nausea and back pain, were observed in both groups. Both formulations had triphasic plasma profiles with long terminal half-lives (liposomal AMB, 152 +/- 116 h; AMB-DOC, 127 +/- 30 h), but plasma concentrations were higher (P < 0.01) after administration of liposomal AMB (maximum concentration of drug in serum [C(max)], 22.9 +/- 10 microg/ml) than those of AMB-DOC (Cmax, 1.4 +/- 0.2 microg/ml). Liposomal AMB had a central compartment volume close to that of plasma (50 +/- 19 ml/kg) and a volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) (774 +/- 550 ml/kg) smaller than the Vss of AMB-DOC (1,807 +/- 239 ml/kg) (P < 0.01). Total clearances were similar (approximately 10 ml hr(-1) kg(-1)), but renal and fecal clearances of liposomal AMB were 10-fold lower than those of AMB-DOC (P < 0.01). Two-thirds of the AMB-DOC was excreted unchanged in the urine (20.6%) and feces (42.5%) with >90% accounted for in mass balance calculations at 1 week, suggesting that metabolism plays at most a minor role in AMB elimination. In contrast, <10% of the liposomal AMB was excreted unchanged. No metabolites were observed by HPLC or mass spectrometry. In comparison to AMB-DOC, liposomal AMB produced higher plasma exposures and lower volumes of distribution and markedly decreased the excretion of unchanged drug in urine and feces. Thus, liposomal AMB significantly alters the excretion and mass balance of AMB. The ability of liposomes to sequester drugs in circulating liposomes and within deep tissue compartments may account for these differences.