Clinafloxacin pharmacokinetics in subjects with various degrees of renal function

Optimization of tigecycline dosage regimen for different infections in the patients with hepatic or renal impairment

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of various tigecycline dosing regimens in patients with hepatic or renal impairment.

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulations were performed using pharmacokinetic parameters and microbiological data to evaluate various tigecycline regimens in patients with hepatic or renal impairment.

RESULTS

For HAP and cIAI, the regimen of 25 mg q12h achieved CFR values of >90% in Child-Pugh C patients against Gram-positive bacteria and partial Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli and Klebsiella oxytoca). However, dose increases of tigecycline was mostly required for Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumanni. The conventional tigecycline regimen (50 mg q12h) was effective for HAP and cIAI caused by Gram-positive bacteria and Escherichia coli in patients with renal impairment. For HAP caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae, patients with severe renal failure can use the standard dose regimen 50 mg q12h, and other patients need to increase the dose of tigecycline. However, when treating cSSSI caused by Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter cloacae and Klebsiella pneumoniae, all tigecycline maintenance doses have a CFR <90%.

CONCLUSIONS

It is necessary to optimize tigecycline dosage regimens in patients with hepatic or renal impairment in order to maximise clinical response and minimise the probability of exposure-related toxicity.

Analysis of the variability of the pharmacokinetics of multiple drugs in young adult and elderly subjects and its implications for acceptable daily exposures and cleaning validation limits

The elderly constitute a significant, potentially sensitive, subpopulation within the general population, which must be taken into account when performing risk assessments including determining an acceptable daily exposure (ADE) for the purpose of a cleaning validation. Known differences in the pharmacokinetics of drugs between young adults (who are typically the subjects recruited into clinical trials) and the elderly are potential contributors affecting the interindividual uncertainty factor (UF_H) component of the ADE calculation. The UF_H values were calculated for 206 drugs for young adult and elderly groups separately and combined (with the elderly assumed to be a sensitive subpopulation) from published studies where the pharmacokinetics of the young adult and elderly groups were directly compared. Based on the analysis presented here, it is recommended to use a default UF_H value of 10 for worker populations (which are assumed to be approximately equivalent to the young adult groups) where no supporting pharmacokinetic data exist, while it is recommended to use a default UF_H value of 15 for the general population, to take the elderly into consideration when calculating ADE values. The underlying reasons for the large differences between the exposures in the young adult and elderly subjects for the 10 compounds which show the greatest separation are different in almost every case, involving the OCT2 transporter, glucuronidation, hydrolysis, CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 or CYP3A5. Therefore, there is no consistent underlying mechanism which appears responsible for the largest differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between young adult and elderly subjects.

Tigecycline pharmacokinetics in subjects with various degrees of renal function

The pharmacokinetic parameters of tigecycline were assessed in subjects with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, n = 6), subjects receiving hemodialysis (4 received tigecycline before and 4 received tigecycline after hemodialysis), and subjects with age-adjusted, normal renal function (n = 6) after administration of single 100-mg doses. Serial serum and urine samples were collected and assayed using validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometer (LC/MS/MS) methods. Concentration-time data were then analyzed using noncompartmental pharmacokinetic methods. Tigecycline renal clearance in subjects with normal renal function represented approximately 20% of total systemic clearance. Tigecycline clearance was reduced by approximately 20%, and area under the tigecycline concentration-time curve increased by approximately 30% in subjects with severe renal impairment. Tigecycline was not efficiently removed by dialysis; thus, it can be administered without regard to timing of hemodialysis. Based on these pharmacokinetic data, tigecycline requires no dosage adjustment in patients with renal impairment.

Relationship of quantitative structure and pharmacokinetics in fluoroquinolone antibacterials

AIM: To study the relationship between quantitative structure and pharmacokinetics (QSPkR) of fluoroquinolone antibacterials.

METHODS: The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of oral fluoroquinolones were collected from the litera-ture. These pharmacokinetic data were averaged, 19 compounds were used as the training set, and 3 served as the test set. Genetic function approximation (GFA) module of Cerius² software was used in QSPkR analysis.

RESULTS: A small volume and large polarizability and surface area of substituents at C-7 contribute to a large area under the curve (AUC) for fluoroquinolones. Large polarizability and small volume of substituents at N-1 contribute to a long half life elimination.

CONCLUSION: QSPkR models can contribute to some fluoroquinolones antibacterials with excellent pharmacokinetic properties.

Garenoxacin pharmacokinetics in subjects with renal impairment

OBJECTIVE

This open-label, parallel-group study determined the pharmacokinetics of garenoxacin in subjects with severe renal impairment, including subjects maintained on dialysis.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Subjects were assigned to one of four groups according to their underlying renal function: creatinine clearance (CL(cr)) > 80 mL/min, CL(cr) < 30 mL/min, hemodialysis (HD), and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Subjects received a single oral 600-mg dose of garenoxacin. Administration of garenoxacin to subjects receiving hemodialysis was completed in two phases separated by 14 days: 3 h before HD (phase 1) and immediately after HD (phase 2).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Plasma and urine or dialysate samples were analyzed for garenoxacin, and single-dose pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. Safety was assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-five subjects received garenoxacin. Compared with healthy controls, garenoxacin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration were increased by 51% and lowered by 20%, respectively, in subjects with severe renal impairment. The terminal half-life was prolonged in subjects with severe renal impairment compared with healthy controls (26.5 +/- 7 h vs 14.4 +/- 3 h, respectively). In subjects receiving HD or CAPD, removal of garenoxacin from systemic circulation was relatively inefficient (HD, 1.5-11.5%; CAPD, 3%), suggesting no need for a supplemental dose of garenoxacin after dialysis. Garenoxacin was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the broad therapeutic index of garenoxacin, the effects of renal impairment on garenoxacin exposure are not considered clinically significant. There was a modest increase in AUC in subjects with severe renal impairment and the magnitude of the changes was not considered clinically relevant.

Drug interactions with clinafloxacin

Many fluoroquinolone antibiotics are inhibitors of cytochrome P450 enzyme systems and may produce potentially important drug interactions when administered with other drugs. Studies were conducted to determine the effect of clinafloxacin on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline, caffeine, warfarin, and phenytoin, as well as the effect of phenytoin on the pharmacokinetics of clinafloxacin. Concomitant administration of 200 or 400 mg of clinafloxacin reduces mean theophylline clearance by approximately 50 and 70%, respectively, and reduces mean caffeine clearance by 84%. (R)-Warfarin concentrations in plasma during clinafloxacin administration are 32% higher and (S)-warfarin concentrations do not change during clinafloxacin treatment. An observed late pharmacodynamic effect was most likely due to gut flora changes. Phenytoin has no effect on clinafloxacin pharmacokinetics, while phenytoin clearance is 15% lower during clinafloxacin administration.