Addition of caspofungin to fluconazole does not improve outcome in murine candidiasis

CAF to the Rescue! Potential and Challenges of Combination Antifungal Therapy for Reducing Morbidity and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Serious Fungal Infections

The global burden of invasive fungal disease is substantial and escalating. Combination antifungal therapy (CAF) may improve patient outcomes by reducing development of resistance, improving drug penetration and rate of fungal clearance, and allowing for lower and less toxic antifungal drug doses; yet, increased cost, antagonism, drug-drug interactions, and toxicity are concerns. Clinical practice guidelines recommend antifungal monotherapy, rather than CAF, for most invasive fungal diseases due to a lack of comparative randomized clinical trials. An examination of the existing body of CAF research should frame new hypotheses and determine priorities for future CAF clinical trials. We performed a systematic review of CAF clinical studies for invasive candidiasis, cryptococcosis, invasive aspergillosis, and mucormycosis. Additionally, we summarized findings from animal models of CAF and assessed laboratory methods available to evaluate CAF efficacy. Future CAF trials should be prioritized according to animal models showing improved survival and observational clinical data supporting efficacy and safety.

Antifungal Combinations against Candida Species: From Bench to Bedside

Candida spp. is the major causative agent of fungal infections in hospitalized patients and the fourth most common cause of nosocomial bloodstream infection (BSI). The availability of standardized methods for testing the in vitro activity of antifungals along with the expanding of antifungal armamentarium, the rising of drug-resistance and the persistence of a high mortality rate in systemic candidiasis have led to an increased interest in combination therapy. Therefore, we aimed to review the scientific literature concerning the antifungal combinations against Candida. A literature search performed in PubMed yielded 92 studies published from 2000 to 2021: 29 articles referring to in vitro studies, six articles referring to either in vitro and in vivo (i.e., animal models) studies and 57 clinical articles. Pre-clinical studies involved 735 isolates of Candida species and 12 unique types of antifungal combination approaches including azoles plus echinocandins (19%), polyenes plus echinocandins (16%), polyenes plus azoles (13%), polyenes plus 5-flucytosine ([5-FC], 13%), azoles plus 5-FC (11%) and other types of combinations (28%). Results varied greatly, often being species-, drug- and methodology-dependent. Some combinatorial regimens exerted a synergistic effect against difficult-to-treat Candida species (i.e., azoles plus echinocandins; polyenes plus 5-FC) or they were more effective than monotherapy in prevent or reducing biofilm formation and in speeding the clearance of infected tissues (i.e., polyenes plus echinocandins). In 283 patients with documented Candida infections (>90% systemic candidiasis/BSI), an antifungal combination approach could be evaluated. Combinations included: azoles plus echinocandins (36%), 5-FC-combination therapies (24%), polyenes plus azoles (18%), polyenes plus echinocandins (16%) and other types of combination therapy (6%). Case reports describing combination therapies yielded favorable response in most cases, including difficult-to-treat fungal infections (i.e., endocarditis, osteoarticular infections, CNS infections) or difficult-to-treat fungal pathogens. The only randomized trial comparing amphotericin-B deoxycholate (AMB) plus FLU vs. AMB alone for treatment of BSI in nonneutropenic patients showed that the combination trended toward improved success and more-rapid clearance from the bloodstream. In summary, antifungal combinations against Candida have produced great interest in the past two decades. To establish whether this approach can become a reliable treatment option, additional in vitro and clinical data are warranted.

Caspofungin: Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses and treatment outcomes

Over the past decade, echinocandins have emerged as first-line antifungal agents for many Candida infections. The echinocandins have a unique mechanism of action, inhibiting the synthesis of β-1,3-d-glucan polymers, key components of the cell wall in pathogenic fungi. Caspofungin was the first echinocandin antifungal agent to become licensed for use. The objectives of this review are to summarize the existing published data on caspofungin, under the subject headings of chemistry and mechanism of action, spectrum of activity, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical studies, safety, drug interactions, dosing, and an overview of the drug's current place in therapy.

Mechanism underlying renal failure caused by pathogenic Candida albicans infection

Candida albicans (C. albicans) is an opportunistic fungal pathogen that commonly causes nosocomial infections. Systemic candidiasis is encountered with increasing frequency in immunocompromised hosts, leading to renal failure that results in severe morbidity and mortality. The present study investigated the mechanisms underlying kidney susceptibility following infection with several C. albicans strains, such as B311 and SC5314. Fungal growth of the highly virulent SC5314 strain was 10³-fold higher compared to the nonpathogenic B311 strain in the kidneys. An intravenous challenge of SC5314 in mice, elevated blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatine levels, which resulted in mortality at 8 or 35 days after infection in a dose- and time-dependent manner, whereas all the B311-infected mice had BUN and creatinine levels in the normal range and survived. Whether virulent C. albicans may escape clearance by activating signaling pathways that lead to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-1β, was investigated. B311 infections significantly elevated TNF-α and IL-1β mRNA expression in the kidneys, whereas the expression in SC5314-infected mice remained unchanged. Furthermore, B311 infection significantly elevated the plasma levels of TNF-α and IL-1β. These results indicated that the less virulent strains of C. albicans induced pro-inflammatory cytokines in mice. These results determined that an impairment of the protective mechanisms occurred in the kidneys with virulent C. albicans infection.

Recent advances in antifungal pharmacotherapy for invasive fungal infections

Invasive fungal infections carry significant morbidity and mortality. Candida species have become one of the most frequent causes of bloodstream infections, and infections caused by molds such as Aspergillus are becoming more frequent in immunocompromised patients. As this population grows, more invasive fungal infections can be anticipated. In the past, treatment options have been limited for many of these infections due to toxicity and efficacy concerns with the available antifungals. Fortunately, the past few years have brought exciting developments in antifungal pharmacotherapy. Lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B were introduced in the 1990s to attenuate adverse effects caused by amphotericin B deoxycholate (Fungizone, Bristol-Myers Squibb). Most recently, the echinocandins have been added to our antifungal regimen with the introduction of caspofungin (Cancidas, Merck and Co.) and voriconazole (Vfend, Pfizer), a new triazole, has come to market. The introduction of the echinocandins has invigorated the discussion about combination antifungal therapy. Evidence-based studies using these new agents are accumulating, and they are assuming important roles in the pharmacotherapy of invasive fungal infections in seriously ill and complex patients.

Posaconazole exhibits in vitro and in vivo synergistic antifungal activity with caspofungin or FK506 against Candida albicans

The object of this study was to test whether posaconazole, a broad-spectrum antifungal agent inhibiting ergosterol biosynthesis, exhibits synergy with the β-1,3 glucan synthase inhibitor caspofungin or the calcineurin inhibitor FK506 against the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Although current drug treatments for Candida infection are often efficacious, the available antifungal armamentarium may not be keeping pace with the increasing incidence of drug resistant strains. The development of drug combinations or novel antifungal drugs to address emerging drug resistance is therefore of general importance. Combination drug therapies are employed to treat patients with HIV, cancer, or tuberculosis, and has considerable promise in the treatment of fungal infections like cryptococcal meningitis and C. albicans infections. Our studies reported here demonstrate that posaconazole exhibits in vitro synergy with caspofungin or FK506 against drug susceptible or resistant C. albicans strains. Furthermore, these combinations also show in vivo synergy against C. albicans strain SC5314 and its derived echinocandin-resistant mutants, which harbor an S645Y mutation in the CaFks1 β-1,3 glucan synthase drug target, suggesting potential therapeutic applicability for these combinations in the future.

Cryptococcus neoformans: the model organism for yeast antifungal drug susceptibility testing

We describe an approach to antifungal susceptibility testing of the yeast Cryptococcus neoformans that shows promise for predicting the mycological response in patients to treatment. Quantitative cultures of the cerebrospinal fluid provide a direct measure of the patient's mycological response to treatment and have been used in multiple studies to identify the most promising antifungal drugs for subsequent testing in larger clinical studies. Using these quantitative measures of response, a modified macrobroth dilution assay system shows the potential for predicting the response of an individual patient to treatment with amphotericin B, fluconazole, or the combination of amphotericin B plus flucytosine. We describe this modified macrobroth dilution assay method, the statistical approach for assessing susceptibility, and the clinical decisions that can be guided by this in vitro antifungal drug susceptibility testing.

Echinocandin pharmacodynamics: review and clinical implications

Echinocandins have made a significant impact in the treatment of select invasive fungal infections, most notably invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis. However, treatment outcomes for such infections are still less than optimal, prompting an examination of dosing and administration techniques in an attempt to exploit known pharmacodynamic properties and improve outcomes. Echinocandins generally exhibit concentration-dependent, fungicidal activity against Candida spp. and fungistatic activity against Aspergillus spp. However, increasing drug concentrations of echinocandins above the organism's MIC may result in a paradoxical increase in fungal growth as demonstrated in some in vitro and in vivo models (known most commonly as the 'Eagle effect'). Therefore, the potential impact of dose escalations on improving the clinical efficacy of echinocandins based on in vitro and animal models are uncertain and are still being evaluated. In addition, such strategies have to consider the potential for increased treatment-related toxicities and costs. To date, published clinical studies (both superiority and non-inferiority) demonstrating the potential for dose-related improvements in treatment outcomes have been limited to mucocutaneous and oesophageal candidiasis. Further research is needed to determine if a role exists for optimizing echinocandin pharmacodynamics in various clinical settings.

Assessment of the in vitro kinetic activity of caspofungin against Candida glabrata

Echinocandins have become the drug of choice in infections caused by Candida glabrata. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of caspofungin alone and in combination against C. glabrata. In vitro assays demonstrated that caspofungin alone showed excellent fungicidal activity against C. glabrata, including fluconazole-resistant strains. The combination of caspofungin and azole antifungals showed potential synergy against C. glabrata. Overall, caspofungin demonstrated excellent in vitro activity, alone and in combination, against strains of C. glabrata.

Combination antifungals: an update

Invasive fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in specific patient populations. There has been an impressive increase in the antifungal armamentarium, yet optimal therapies for many invasive fungal infections remain unknown. Genomic sequencing of a number of pathogenic fungi will pave the way to discovering additional newer targets for antifungal drug design. These new discoveries, plus the existing repertoire of antifungal agents, create the need to effectively model single and combination antifungal agents. Future therapies may also include the use of cell-stress pathway inhibitors in combination with existing antifungal agents. This review focuses on combination antifungal therapy against Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida and Aspergillus species. Combination therapy is only supported by randomized clinical trials for cryptococcal meningitis. We review data from in vitro and animal model studies as well as insights from clinical trials to discuss current thoughts and highlight the gaps in our knowledge surrounding combination antifungal therapy.

Treatment of Candida albicans pericarditis in a heart transplant patient

Pericarditis due to Candida species is a rare clinical entity, associated with thoracic surgery and immunosuppression. We report here the second case of pericarditis due to Candida albicans in a heart transplant patient, which presented as tamponade approximately 3 weeks post transplant, in the absence of evidence of sternal osteomyelitis. The patient was treated with pericardiocentesis and a combination of caspofungin and fluconazole, but the patient ultimately required the explantation of retained epicardial leads and the creation of a pericardial window. This case illustrates that Candida species must be considered in the differential diagnosis in post-transplant pericarditis, and that foreign body removal is, as always, key in helping to resolve such infections. This case also demonstrates the first use of caspofungin with fluconazole to treat Candida pericarditis. We discuss the conflicting data regarding the use of caspofungin, alone or in combination therapy, in treating infections involving biofilms, such as the infected pericardium.

Combination antifungal therapy: the new frontier

The past decade has seen a significant increase in the incidence of invasive fungal infections. The antifungal armamentarium for the treatment of serious fungal infections remains limited. A possible approach to overcoming antifungal drug resistance and high mortality rates seen in severe fungal infections is to combine two or three classes of antifungals, especially if the drugs have different mechanisms of action. Combinations of new agents along with more traditional antifungals have now been shown to possess some synergistic or at least additive activity against many fungi in in vitro and animal studies. On the other hand, caution is still needed since some antifungal combinations have also demonstrated antagonistic activity. Well-controlled clinical trials are still required to define the most efficacious antifungal regimen. Furthermore, these trials should also evaluate the side-effect potential of combination regimens and the pharmacoeconomic impact these regimens may have.

Efficacies of caspofungin and a combination of caspofungin and meropenem in the treatment of murine disseminated candidiasis

Disseminated candidiasis is relatively common in immunocompromised patients. The treatment protocol of these patients usually includes broad-spectrum antibiotics and also emprical antifungals initiated due to unresponsiveness to antibiotics. In this study the efficacies of caspofungin and meropenem - separately and together - in mice with disseminated candidiasis were studied. Immunocompetent mice were infected intravenously with 2x10(6) CFU of Candida albicans. At 24 h postinfection, intraperitoneal therapy was initiated and was continued for 7 days. Therapy groups included those given caspofungin (0.5, 1.25, 5 mg/kg/day), meropenem (20 mg/kg/day), and a combination of the two drugs. The outcome of therapy was evaluated by kidney tissue burden studies and histologic examination. In vitro, drug susceptibilities were tested by checkerboard analysis. Kidney CFU counts showed that mice that had received both drugs had lower residual burdens. Caspofungin was effective at doses of 0.5, 1.25, 5 mg/kg compared to infected untreated controls. In vitro, MICs of caspofungin and meropenem were <0.075 micro g/ml and >64 micro g/ml, respectively. Synergism was observed with the combination. Histopathology showed that the degree of inflammation was 25% less and tubular necrosis was more restricted in combined therapy than monotherapy. The results indicate that concurrent caspofungin and meropenem therapy may be beneficial.

Prevention and treatment of Candida infections in neonates

Invasive Candia infections have become the third most common cause of late-onset infection among very low birth weight infants in most neonatal intensive care units. Significant risk factors include birth weight less than 1000 g, exposure to more than two antibiotics, third generation cephalosporin exposure, parenteral nutrition including lipid emulsion, central venous catheter, and abdominal surgery. The majority of neonatal Candida infections are caused by C. albicans and C. parapsilosis, although other nonalbicans species are being reported more frequently. Standard therapy has been amphotericin B; however, successful use of fluconazole as a single agent has also been reported and a small comparison trial demonstrated similar efficacy. The addition of new antifungal agents, including voriconazole and the echinocandins may further improve our ability to effectively treat these infections and possibly reduce the development of complications. Antifungal chemoprophylaxis has been studied in single-center and cohort studies, primarily using fluconazole. Although it is clear that fluconazole prophylaxis decreases the risk of fungal colonization and infection, identification of potential harm, particularly the development of or selection for resistant strains, requires further investigation with multicenter trials before widespread use is recommended outside of the clinical trial setting.

Emerging echinocandins for treatment of invasive fungal infections

The echinocandins are a new class of antifungals, developed in response to the need for safe and effective antifungals for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. These agents work by inhibiting 1,3-beta-d-glucan synthase, an enzyme essential for production of cell walls in select fungi. Echinocandins appear to demonstrate favourable activity in vitro against a variety of yeasts (including both Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida) as well as select moulds (including Aspergillus spp.) In general, all echninocandins demonstrate a favourable safety profile and require once-daily parenteral administration. Caspofungin is the first of these agents to be available in the US, and is approved for empirical antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenic patients, candidaemia and select forms of invasive candidiasis, and for management of invasive aspergillosis in patients refractory to or intolerant of other therapies. Micafungin was recently approved by the FDA for treatment of oesophageal candidiasis, and for the prophylaxis of fungal infections in haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Emerging data indicate micafungin may have an important role in the treatment of invasive forms of candidiasis. Anidulafungin is an echinocandin approved in the US for treatment of candidaemia and oesophageal candidiasis. Aminocandin (HMR-3702, IP-960) is an investigational agent, with published experience limited to in vitro studies and animal models of infection.

Animal models testing monotherapy versus combination antifungal therapy: lessons learned and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The continued rise in serious fungal infections and rises in therapy failure dictate that more efficacious therapies be developed. Combination therapy using available drugs is an attractive choice, yet primarily only anecdotal clinical data are available. We review here data from animal models as an indicator of future potential.

RECENT FINDINGS

The primary data are from murine studies and we will briefly review chemotherapeutic combination studies, some showing benefit over monotherapy and some showing no benefit over monotherapy. In addition, we will address the potential of immunotherapy in combination with conventional therapy.

SUMMARY

The data derived from animal model studies of antifungal drug efficacy have proven to be predictive of clinical utility. Studies on combination therapy will prove useful to the clinician in evaluating courses of treatment, especially where clinical-trial data are not available or probable in the future.

Antifungal combination therapy: clinical potential

Combination antifungal therapy has been an area of research and clinical interest since systemic antifungals became available decades ago. In vitro and clinical data were generated for some of the more common invasive fungal infections, especially candidiasis, but until very recently few clinical studies were performed. The first invasive fungal infection to be examined in clinical trials with adequate statistical power was cryptococcal meningitis and several of these trials stand out as classical studies in the clinical evaluation of combination antifungal therapy. More recently, since the availability of the newer antifungal agents, including the echinocandins and extended-spectrum triazoles, there has been a growing interest in examining combination antifungal therapy for invasive fungal disease, especially invasive aspergillosis. This is by no means a comprehensive review of all existing experimental data. Instead, the focus is on the clinical data that have been generated to date and on providing insights into potential future clinical directions. For instance, recent clinical data for cryptococcosis confirm that amphotericin B plus flucytosine is the most active combination for patients with cryptococcal meningitis. A recently completed clinical trial in candidaemia suggests a trend towards improved outcomes among patients receiving amphotericin B plus fluconazole versus fluconazole alone. In aspergillosis, several experimental models suggest benefit of a variety of antifungal combinations, but have not been confirmed in prospective clinical trials. Ultimately, the goal is to provide the reader with a comprehensive but useful review to this complicated and often confusing therapeutic dilemma.

Caspofungin inhibits Rhizopus oryzae 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase, lowers burden in brain measured by quantitative PCR, and improves survival at a low but not a high dose during murine disseminated zygomycosis

Rhizopus oryzae is the most common cause of zygomycosis, a life-threatening infection that usually occurs in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis. Despite standard therapy, the overall rate of mortality from zygomycosis remains >50%, and new strategies for treatment are urgently needed. The activities of caspofungin acetate (CAS) and other echinocandins (antifungal inhibitors of the synthesis of 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase [GS]) against the agents of zygomycosis have remained relatively unexplored, especially in animal models of infection. We found that R. oryzae has both an FKS gene, which in other fungi encodes a subunit of the GS synthesis complex, and CAS-susceptible, membrane-associated GS activity. Low-dose but not high-dose CAS improved the survival of mice with diabetic ketoacidosis infected with a small inoculum but not a large inoculum of R. oryzae. Fungal burden, assessed by a novel quantitative PCR assay, correlated with increasing inocula and progression of disease, particularly later in the infection, when CFU counts did not. CAS decreased the brain burden of R. oryzae when it was given prophylactically but not when therapy was started after infection. These results indicate that CAS has significant but limited activity against R. oryzae in vivo and demonstrates an inverse dose-response effect. The potential for CAS to play a role in combination therapy against zygomycosis merits further investigation.

Combination treatment of invasive fungal infections

The persistence of high morbidity and mortality from systemic fungal infections despite the availability of novel antifungals points to the need for effective treatment strategies. Treatment of invasive fungal infections is often hampered by drug toxicity, tolerability, and specificity issues, and added complications often arise due to the lack of diagnostic tests and to treatment complexities. Combination therapy has been suggested as a possible approach to improve treatment outcome. In this article, we undertake a historical review of studies of combination therapy and also focus on recent studies involving newly approved antifungal agents. The limitations surrounding antifungal combinations include nonuniform interpretation criteria, inability to predict the likelihood of clinical success, strain variability, and variations in pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties of antifungals used in combination. The issue of antagonism between polyenes and azoles is beginning to be addressed, but data regarding other drug combinations are not adequate for us to draw definite conclusions. However, recent data have identified potentially useful combinations. Standardization of assay methods and adoption of common interpretive criteria are essential to avoid discrepancies between different in vitro studies. Larger clinical trials are needed to assess whether combination therapy improves survival and treatment outcome in the most seriously debilitated patients afflicted with life-threatening fungal infections.

Need for early antifungal treatment confirmed in experimental disseminated Candida albicans infection

Groups of mice infected intravenously with Candida albicans were treated intraperitoneally with amphotericin B, caspofungin, or fluconazole, starting at intervals before and after challenge. Survival was longest and tissue burdens were most reduced with early treatment, and survival times fell proportionately as treatment was delayed, reinforcing clinical recommendations for the earliest possible initiation of antifungal therapy.

Sequential therapy with caspofungin and fluconazole for Candida albicans infection

A sequential therapy of caspofungin (CAS) and fluconazole (FLC) administration for treatment of Candida albicans infection was investigated. Treatment with CAS followed by FLC was as effective as CAS treatment given alone for the same duration. Our data suggest that switching from CAS to FLC is a potentially explorable therapeutic option for treatment of systemic candidiasis.

In vitro activities of voriconazole in combination with three other antifungal agents against Candida glabrata

Candida glabrata has recently emerged as a significant pathogen involved in both superficial and deep-seated infections. In the present study, a checkerboard broth microdilution method was performed to investigate the in vitro activities of voriconazole (VOR) in combination with terbinafine (TRB), amphotericin B (AMB), and flucytosine (5FC) against 20 clinical isolates of C. glabrata. Synergy, defined as a fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index of < or = 0.50, was observed in 75% of VOR-TRB, 10% of VOR-AMB, and 5% of VOR-5FC interactions. None of these combinations yielded antagonistic interactions (FIC index > 4). When synergy was not achieved, there was still a decrease in the MIC of one or both drugs used in the combination. In particular, the MICs were reduced to < or = 1.0 microg/ml as a result of the combination for all isolates for which the AMB MIC at the baseline was > or = 2.0 microg/ml. By a disk diffusion assay, the halo diameters produced by antifungal agents in combination were greater that those produced by each drug alone. Finally, killing curves showed that VOR-AMB exhibited synergistic interactions, while VOR-5FC sustained fungicidal activities against C. glabrata. These studies demonstrate that the in vitro activity of VOR against this important yeast pathogen can be enhanced upon combination with other drugs that have different modes of action or that target a different step in the ergosterol pathway. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the potential beneficial effects of such combination regimens in vivo.

Paradoxical effect of caspofungin: reduced activity against Candida albicans at high drug concentrations

Resistance problems with caspofungin, an echinocandin inhibitor of fungal cell wall glucan synthesis, have been rare. We noted paradoxical turbid growth of Candida albicans isolates in broth in some high (supra-MIC) concentrations. Among isolates submitted for susceptibility testing and screened at drug concentrations up to 12.5 microg/ml, the frequency was 16%. Analysis of the turbid growth indicated slowing of growth in the presence of drug but with numbers of CFU up to 72% those of drug-free controls. Clearing of growth again by the highest drug concentrations produced a quadriphasic pattern in a tube dilution series. Cells growing at high drug concentrations were not resistant on retesting but showed the paradoxical effect of the parent. Among a selected series of isolates tested at concentrations up to 50 microg/ml, an additional 53% showed a "mini-paradoxical effect": no turbid growth but incomplete killing at high concentrations (supra-minimum fungicidal concentration). These effects were reproducible; medium dependent in extent; noted in macro- and microdilution, in the presence or absence of serum, and on agar containing drug (but not when drug concentrations were not constant, as in agar diffusion); not seen with other echinocandins and less commonly in other Candida species; and not due to destruction of drug in tubes showing the effect. Cooperative enhancement of inhibition by a second drug could eradicate the effect. We postulate that high drug concentrations derepress or activate resistance mechanisms. The abilities of subpopulations to survive at high drug concentrations could have in vivo consequences.

Fungal infections in bone marrow transplant patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Invasive fungal infections have become the leading infectious cause of death in recipients of hematopoietic cell transplantation. Several factors have led to a renaissance in the study of invasive fungal infections. The growing incidence of both commonly encountered as well as emerging pathogens and the lethality of these infections coupled with the unprecedented number of available broad-spectrum antifungal drugs has lent a renewed vigor and enthusiasm to attempts to understand the pathogenesis of these diseases and, by doing so, improve prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. The following is a review of the primary research published from 2003 to the present that is pertinent to invasive fungal infection in the setting of hematopoietic cell transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The main themes of published primary research during 2003 to the present include the efficacy and tolerability of antifungal prophylaxis, epidemiologic analyses of risk factors following nonmyeloablative preparative regimens, and more-detailed analyses of nonmyeloid immune responses.

SUMMARY

Although few definitive recommendations emerged from the studies during the review period, these investigations do contribute to a greater understanding of the immunobiology of invasive fungal infection and of the utility and limitations of newer antifungal agents in the prophylaxis or treatment of invasive fungal infection.

Combinations of antifungal agents in therapy--what value are they?

Concurrent or sequential antifungal treatment for invasive mycoses has been typically considered as an option to improve results of monotherapy. However, data on the efficacy of combination therapy are sparse and consist largely of results from studies in vitro and experimental animal models. These studies have yielded controversial results depending on the criteria used to evaluate the antifungal interaction. Several combinations that showed synergy in vitro failed to do so in animal models. Overall, apart from cryptococcal infections, combined antifungal therapy is not significantly better than monotherapy in terms of clinical efficacy. It is questionable whether combination therapy should be used in most cases as there is a lack of evidence from well-designed clinical trials. However, combination therapy could be an alternative to monotherapy for patients with invasive infections that are difficult to treat, such as those due to multi-resistant species and for those who fail to respond to standard treatment.

Toward more effective antifungal therapy: the prospects of combination therapy

The availability of new antifungal agents with unique mechanisms of action and improved tolerability has widened the possibilities for the use of combination antifungal therapy for difficult-to-treat opportunistic mycoses. However, the use of this therapy is largely governed by empiricism, especially in patients with invasive mould infections, for whom there is a tremendous need to improve outcomes. Because of the difficulties associated with the design and conduct of clinical trials of combination antifungal therapy for opportunistic mycoses, the majority of the studies evaluating antifungal combinations are still performed in the laboratory or using animal models of infection. However, the methods used to assess combined antifungal effects in vitro and in animals are poorly standardized, and there is little evidence that data generated from these studies can be translated in treating human mycotic infections. Despite the empiricism of combination antifungal therapy, certain principles help guide the use and study of these regimens.

Status of combination therapy for refractory mycoses

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Invasive fungal infections remain a leading cause of infectious morbidity and mortality in heavily immunosuppressed patients. As the efficacy of current antifungal agents is suboptimal, combinations of antifungal agents, administered concomitantly or sequentially, are increasingly used (mostly empirically) as a strategy to improve the treatment outcomes for refractory mycoses. Here we review recent developments in the area of antifungal combinations based on both laboratory (in vitro and in animal models) and clinical studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the exception of cryptococcal meningitis, the benefits of combination antifungal therapy have been more difficult to prove for other life-threatening mycoses such as invasive candidiasis or invasive aspergillosis. The recent introduction of a new class of antifungal agents (the echinocandins) and of extended spectrum triazoles has renewed interest in studying antifungal combinations that may result in additive or synergistic effects in difficult-to-treat mycoses. The combination of an echinocandin plus amphotericin B or a newer triazole seems to be the most promising in vitro and in animal model studies, whereas reliable clinical information especially for invasive mould infections is still lacking.

SUMMARY

Antifungal combinations are conceptually appealing as a strategy to overcome the frequent failures of antifungal monotherapy in immunosuppressed patients with invasive mycoses. Results of in-vitro studies cannot yet be translated into measurable clinical results because of methodological problems and the complexity of designing relevant prospective clinical trials, but important findings are expected in the near future in this rapidly expanding investigational area.

Caspofungin

Echinocandins are a new class of antifungal agents with a novel mechanism of action (interference with fungal cell wall synthesis). Caspofungin (Cancidas), Caspofungin MSD) is the first echinocandin to be approved and is administered intravenously. Caspofungin 50 mg/day had similar efficacy to intravenous fluconazole 200 mg/day and was at least as effective as intravenous amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg/day in patients with oesophageal candidiasis in two randomised, double-blind studies. A favourable combined clinical and endoscopic response occurred in 81% of caspofungin recipients versus 85% of fluconazole recipients and in 74% of caspofungin recipients versus 63% of amphotericin B recipients. A favourable combined response rate of approximate, equals 90% and approximate, equals 60% occurred in the stratum of patients with oesophageal candidiasis who received caspofungin or amphotericin B in a third randomised, double-blind study. Caspofungin (70 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg/day) had similar efficacy to intravenous amphotericin B (0.7-1.0 mg/kg/day in patients with neutropenia and 0.6-0.7 mg/kg/day in patients without neutropenia) in patients with invasive candidiasis in a double-blind, randomised trial. A favourable overall response occurred in 73.4% of caspofungin recipients and in 61.7% of amphotericin B recipients. In a noncomparative study, salvage therapy with caspofungin (70 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg/day) was effective in patients with invasive aspergillosis who were refractory to or did not tolerate standard antifungal therapy. A favourable response (complete plus partial response) occurred in 37 of 83 patients (45%). Caspofungin was generally well tolerated in clinical trials; it had similar tolerability to intravenous fluconazole and was better tolerated than intravenous amphotericin B. Significantly fewer caspofungin than amphotericin B recipients reported chills, fever, nausea or infusion-related adverse events. In conclusion, caspofungin is a valuable new antifungal agent with a novel mechanism of action. In comparative trials, caspofungin had similar efficacy to fluconazole and was at least as effective as amphotericin B in oesophageal candidiasis and had similar efficacy to amphotericin B in invasive candidiasis. In addition, caspofungin had similar tolerability to fluconazole and was better tolerated than amphotericin B in these indications. Caspofungin was also effective in patients with invasive aspergillosis who were refractory to or intolerant of standard antifungal agents. Thus, caspofungin provides an alternative to triazoles or amphotericin B in oesophageal candidiasis and an alternative to amphotericin B in invasive candidiasis, as well as being an effective salvage therapy in invasive aspergillosis.