Activities of ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and emergence of resistant mutants in an in vitro pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model

NMGMDA: a computational model for predicting potential microbe-drug associations based on minimize matrix nuclear norm and graph attention network

The prediction of potential microbe-drug associations is of great value for drug research and development, especially, methods, based on deep learning, have been achieved significant improvement in bio-medicine. In this manuscript, we proposed a novel computational model named NMGMDA based on the nuclear norm minimization and graph attention network to infer latent microbe-drug associations. Firstly, we created a heterogeneous microbe-drug network in NMGMDA by fusing the drug and microbe similarities with the established drug-microbe associations. After this, by using GAT and NNM to calculate the predict scores. Lastly, we created a fivefold cross validation framework to assess the new model NMGMDA's progressiveness. According to the simulation results, NMGMDA outperforms some of the most advanced methods, with a reliable AUC of 0.9946 on both MDAD and aBioflm databases. Furthermore, case studies on Ciprofloxacin, Moxifoxacin, HIV-1 and Mycobacterium tuberculosis were carried out in order to assess the effectiveness of NMGMDA even more. The experimental results demonstrated that, following the removal of known correlations from the database, 16 and 14 medications as well as 19 and 17 microbes in the top 20 predictions were validated by pertinent literature. This demonstrates the potential of our new model, NMGMDA, to reach acceptable prediction performance.

Risk factors of lower respiratory tract infection caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To systematically evaluate the risk factors of lower respiratory tract infection caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia for better clinical treatment.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Journal full-text Database (CNKI), Wanfang Database (WanFang Data), VIP (VIP), and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were selected and published by June 2022 about the risk factors of lower respiratory tract infection of S. maltophilia. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and quality evaluation according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 18 articles were included, including 10 in English and 8 in Chinese. Meta analysis showed that the risk factors of lower respiratory tract infection caused by S. maltophilia included disease severity, hospitalization days, use of glucocorticoids, invasive procedures, use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and use of more than 3 Antibiotics. The OR values of patients with hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, use of more than 3 Antibiotics, endotracheal intubation and tracheotomy were the highest. Specific hospitalization days (OR = 14.56, 95% CI: 6.12~23.01), mechanical ventilation (OR = 14.16, 95% CI: 5.85~34.3), use of more than 3 Antibiotics (OR = 6.21, 95% CI: 1.24~31.14), tracheal intubation (OR = 6.07, 95% CI: 1.97~3.64), tracheotomy (OR = 3.77, 95% CI: 1.09~13.04).

Conclusion

There are many risk factors for lower respiratory tract infection of S. maltophilia, which can occur in patients with severe illness, high APACHE-II score, invasive procedures, and the need for broad-spectrum antibiotics. In terms of the host, these patients are characterized by impaired immune function, severe illness and long-term hospitalization, which objectively leads to the infection of S. maltophilia. Therefore, strengthening the monitoring, prevention and control of patients with risk factors of S. maltophilia infection is conducive to reducing the risk of infection and death.

Activity of Delafloxacin and Levofloxacin against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia at Simulated Plasma and Intrapulmonary pH Values

Fluoroquinolones have become a popular treatment option for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. Although levofloxacin is most commonly used, delafloxacin demonstrates comparable in vitro activity when evaluated under standard susceptibility testing conditions at neutral pH. At acidic pH, the activity of the anionic delafloxacin is improved, while the activity of the zwitterionic levofloxacin is reduced. Because the human respiratory tract has a pH of ~6.6 and is the most common site of S. maltophilia infection, it is vital to understand the activity of these agents in this environment. Therefore, levofloxacin and delafloxacin were tested against clinical S. maltophilia isolates via broth microdilution testing (n = 37) and time-kill analysis (n = 5) in neutral cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) (pH 7.3) and acidic CAMHB (aCAMHB) (pH 6.5). In CAMHB, MIC50 values were similar between levofloxacin and delafloxacin (8 mg/L versus 8 mg/L). In aCAMHB, levofloxacin MICs did not change, while delafloxacin MICs decreased by a median of 4 log2 dilutions (MIC50 values of 8 mg/L versus 0.25 mg/L). In time-kill analyses, levofloxacin and delafloxacin at the maximum drug concentration for the free drug (fCmax) were bactericidal against 3 and 2 isolates in CAMHB, respectively. In aCAMHB, levofloxacin was not bactericidal against any isolate, while delafloxacin was bactericidal against the same 2 isolates. Relative to CAMHB, levofloxacin activity was reduced by 2.5 log10 CFU/mL in aCAMHB, whereas delafloxacin activity was increased 2.7 log10 CFU/mL. Although the bactericidal activity of levofloxacin against S. maltophilia was attenuated in an acidic environment in this study, the increased potency of delafloxacin at pH 6.5 did not translate into improved bactericidal activity in time-kill analyses, compared to pH 7.3. IMPORTANCE Stenotrophomonas maltophilia most often infects the lungs, where the physiologic environment is naturally slightly acidic (pH ~6.6), compared to most parts of the body (such as the bloodstream), which have neutral pH values (~7.4). Pneumonia due to S. maltophilia is often treated with the antibiotic levofloxacin, despite the activity of levofloxacin being known to be impaired at acidic pH. Unfortunately, currently available methods for susceptibility testing of levofloxacin against S. maltophilia are performed at a neutral pH and therefore may not accurately represent the activity of levofloxacin at the site of infection in the lungs. A similar but newer antibiotic in the same class as levofloxacin, namely, delafloxacin, is not affected by being in an acidic environment and may actually work better at lower pH values. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether one drug might be better than the other in this setting by testing each agent's ability to kill S. maltophilia at pH 7.3 and pH 6.5. These findings could then be used to design confirmatory studies that may ultimately impact which drug is given to patients with lung infections due to S. maltophilia.

Review on Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an emerging multidrug-resistant opportunistic pathogen

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen that results in nosocomial infections in immunocompromised individuals. These bacteria colonize on the surface of medical devices and therapeutic equipment like urinary catheters, endoscopes, and ventilators, causing respiratory and urinary tract infections. The low outer membrane permeability of multidrug-resistance efflux systems and the two chromosomally encoded β-lactamases present in S.maltophilia are challenging for arsenal control. The cell-associated and extracellular virulence factors in S.maltophilia are involved in colonization and biofilm formation on the host surfaces. The spread of antibiotic-resistant genes in the pathogenic S.maltophilia attributes to bacterial resistance against a wide range of antibiotics, including penicillin, quinolones, and carbapenems. So far, tetracycline derivatives, fluoroquinolones, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) are considered promising antibiotics against S.maltophilia. Due to the adaptive nature of the intrinsically resistant mechanism towards the number of antibiotics and its ability to acquire new resistance via mutation and horizontal gene transfer, it is quite tricky for medicinal contribution against S.maltophilia. The current review summarizes the literary data of pathogenicity, quorum sensing, biofilm formation, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance of S.maltophilia.

Overcoming Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Resistance for a More Rational Therapeutic Approach

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an underappreciated source of morbidity and mortality among Gram-negative pathogens. Effective treatment options with acceptable toxicity profiles are limited. Phenotypic susceptibility testing via commercial automated test systems is problematic and no FDA breakpoints are approved for any of the first-line treatment options for S. maltophilia. The lack of modern pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic data for many agents impedes dose optimization and the lack of robust efficacy and safety data limits their clinical utility. Levofloxacin has demonstrated similar efficacy to SMX-TMP, although rapid development of resistance is a concern. Minocycline demonstrates the highest rate of in vitro susceptibility, however, evidence to support its clinical use are scant. Novel agents such as cefiderocol have exhibited promising activity in pre-clinical investigations, though additional outcomes data are needed to determine its place in therapy for S. maltophilia. Combination therapy is often employed despite the dearth of adequate supporting data.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of AmpC β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. A previous guidance document focused on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Here, guidance is provided for treating AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-E), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.

METHODS

A panel of six infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections formulated questions about the treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections. Answers are presented as suggestions and corresponding rationales. In contrast to guidance in the previous document, published data on optimal treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections are limited. As such, guidance in this document is provided as "suggested approaches" based on clinical experience, expert opinion, and a review of the available literature. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment suggestions are provided, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Suggestions apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of September 17, 2021 and will be updated annually. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance-2.0/.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections in Pediatric Patients - Experience at a European Center for Pediatric Hematology and Oncology

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an important nosocomial pathogen in immunocom-promised individuals and characterized by intrinsic resistance to broad-spectrum antibacterial agents. Limited data exists on its clinical relevance in immunocompromised pediatric patients, particularly those with hematological or oncological disorders. In a retrospective single center cohort study in pediatric patients receiving care at a large european pediatric hematology and oncology department, ten cases of invasive S.maltophilia infections (blood stream infections (BSI), 4; BSI and pneumonia, 3, or soft tissue infection, 2; and pneumonia, 1) were identified between 2010 and 2020. Seven patients had lymphoblastic leukemia and/or were post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Invasive S.maltophilia infections occurred in a setting of indwelling central venous catheters, granulocytopenia, defective mucocutaneous barriers, treatment with broad-spectrum antibacterial agents, and admission to the intensive care unit. Whole genome sequencing based typing revealed no genetic relationship among four individual S.maltophilia isolates. The case fatality rate and mortality at 100 days post diagnosis were 40 and 50%, respectively, and three patients died from pulmonary hemorrhage. Invasive S.maltophilia infections are an emerging cause of infectious morbidity in patients receiving care at departments of pediatric hematology and oncology and carry a high case fatality rate.

Antimicrobial Treatment Strategies for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A Focus on Novel Therapies

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an urgent global threat due to its increasing incidence and intrinsic antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic development has focused on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, and Acinetobacter, with approved antibiotics in recent years having limited activity for Stenotrophomonas. Accordingly, novel treatment strategies for Stenotrophomonas are desperately needed. We conducted a systemic literature review and offer recommendations based on current evidence for a treatment strategy of Stenotrophomonas infection.

Clinical outcomes of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, minocycline, or fluoroquinolone monotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The historical treatment of choice for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection is trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and this is primarily based on preclinical studies. The objective of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes of patients receiving monotherapy with different agents.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adult patients receiving monotherapy for S. maltophilia infection with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), a fluoroquinolone, or minocycline from 2010 to 2016. The primary outcome was clinical failure, a composite of recurrence, alteration of therapy due to adverse reaction or concern for clinical failure, or 30-day in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. To account for treatment selection bias, multivariate regression and propensity score weighting were conducted.

RESULTS

284 patients were included (217 received TMP/SMX, 28 received a fluoroquinolone, and 39 received minocycline). The TMP/SMX and minocycline groups appeared to include similar patients whereas the fluoroquinolone group appeared to represent a slightly less severely ill population. Clinical failure was similar between groups (36%, 29%, and 31% in the TMP/SMX, fluoroquinolone, and minocycline groups, respectively, P=0.69) as was 30-day mortality (15%, 7%, and 5% in the TMP/SMX, fluoroquinolone, and minocycline groups, respectively, P=0.16). After controlling for confounding factors, receipt of minocycline (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=0.2 [0.1-0.7]) but not a fluoroquinolone (adjusted OR=0.3 [0.1 to 2.1]) was associated with lower mortality compared with TMP/SMX. This association persisted after propensity score weighting.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes were similar or better with alternatives to TMP/SMX monotherapy, which indicates this may not be the treatment of choice for infections caused by S. maltophilia.

The clinical impact of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia on the 30-day mortality rate in patients with hematologic disorders: a single-institution experience

OBJECTIVE

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM) is an important nosocomial pathogen, particularly in immunocompromised patients due to their adverse antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. The objective of this article was to investigate the clinical impact of SM bacteremia on the 30-day mortality rate and identify the risk factors of the cause of mortality in patients with hematologic disorders.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data in patients diagnosed with hematological disorders and SM bacteremia over an 8-year period from July 2010 to July 2018 at a 248-bed hematology department. We compared patients' clinical characteristics and outcomes between the non-survivor and survivor groups.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of SM bacteremia was 25.1 per 10,000 admissions. There were 59 patients (median age: 35 years; 57.6% males) included in the study with an overall SM bacteremia-related 30-day mortality of 44.1%. Multi-drug resistance was common. In vitro susceptibility is higher to ceftazidime (72.9%), ciprofloxacin (66.1%) and cefoperazone/sulbactam (59.3%). The risk factors identified in the univariate analysis were catheter re-implantation, accompanying polymicrobial infection, inadequate initial antimicrobial treatment, APACHE II score, temperature > 39 °C, septic shock, respiratory failure, and non-remission post treatment for primary diseases. Multivariate analysis further confirmed that inadequate initial antimicrobial treatment, respiratory failure, and non-remission after treatment for hematological diseases are independent risk factors associated with mortality (P = 0.001, 0.002 and 0.007, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that SM bacteremia is highly associated with increased mortality in patients with hematologic diseases. Early detection, prompt comprehensive management including initiation of combined sensitive antibiotics, respiratory monitoring and support, platelet infusion, and strategies to improve patients' remission status are recommended to improve the overall survival in patients with SM bacteremia.

Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole and Moxifloxacin Therapy for a Pediatric Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Infection

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an increasingly prevalent cause of nosocomial infections. This report describes a 5-month-old male diagnosed with a S maltophilia ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection after a neurosurgical procedure. Intravenous trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and moxifloxacin successfully treated the patient. A literature review revealed a scarcity of similar reports, with none using moxifloxacin as an effective concomitant treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Fluoroquinolones versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fluoroquinolones are a popular alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole on mortality of S. maltophilia infections.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and EMBASE.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Clinical studies reporting mortality outcomes of S. maltophilia infections.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with clinical infections caused by S. maltophilia.

INTERVENTIONS

Fluoroquinolone monotherapy in comparison with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole monotherapy.

METHODS

Systematic review with meta-analysis technique.

RESULTS

Seven retrospective cohort and seven case-control studies were included. Three cohort studies were designed to compare the two drugs, whereas others had other purposes. A total of 663 patients were identified, 332 of which were treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (50.1%) and 331 with fluoroquinolones (49.9%). Three cohort studies were designed to compare the effect of the two drugs, whereas the others had other purposes. Levofloxacin was most frequently used among fluoroquinolones (187/331, 56.5%), followed by ciprofloxacin (114/331, 34.4%). The overall mortality rate was 29.6%. Using pooled ORs for the mortality of each study, fluoroquinolone treatment (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.99) was associated with survival benefit over trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment, with low heterogeneity (I² = 18%). Specific fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.17-1.12) and levofloxacin (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48-1.26) did not show a significant difference in comparison with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In the sub-group analyses of adult and bacteraemic patients, significant differences in mortality were not observed between fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a meta-analysis of non-randomized studies, fluoroquinolones demonstrated comparable effects on mortality of S. maltophilia infection to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, supporting the use of fluoroquinolones in clinical S. maltophilia infections. Although the pooled analysis of overall studies favoured fluoroquinolones over trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, the studies included were observational, and sub-group analyses of certain fluoroquinolone agents did not show statistical differences with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Randomized clinical studies are needed to address these issues.

The use and risks of antibiotics in critically ill patients

INTRODUCTION

The altered pathophysiology in critically ill patients presents a unique challenge in both the diagnosis of infection and the appropriate prescription of antibiotics. In this context, the importance of effective and timely treatment needs to be weighed against the individual and community harms associated with antibiotic collateral damage and antibiotic resistance.

AREAS COVERED

We evaluate the principles of antibiotic use in critically ill patients, including dose optimisation, use of combination antibiotic therapy, therapeutic drug monitoring, appropriate antibiotic therapy duration, de-escalation, and utilisation of sepsis biomarkers. We also describe the potential risks associated with antibiotic therapy including antibiotic resistance, delayed treatment, treatment failure, and collateral damage.

EXPERT OPINION

Prescribing teams must be aware of the impact of critical illness on their patients and tailor antibiotic therapy appropriately to prevent the significant harms associated with suboptimal antibiotic administration.

Risk Factors Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bacteremia: A Matched Case-Control Study

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an important nosocomial bacterial pathogen, as is Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Differentiation of these bacteria as bacteremic agents is critical in the clinical setting and to define a therapeutic strategy; however, the associated factors and prognosis for S. maltophilia bacteremia have not been fully evaluated to adequately characterize these factors. We first conducted a matched case-control study to clarify these questions. A total of 30 case patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia were compared with 30 control patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia between January 2005 and August 2014, according to matching criteria based on underlying disease, age, and gender. The 30-day mortality rate for the case patients (53.3%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (30.0%) (P = 0.047, using the log-rank test). Conditional logistic regression analysis showed that the predisposing factors specific for the detection of S. maltophilia bacteremia were indwelling artificial products other than a central venous catheter, ICU stay, and previous use of anti-MRSA drugs. The high severity of illness was associated with mortality in both case and control patients. Interestingly, inappropriate antimicrobial treatment was an additional independent risk factor for mortality in only the case patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia (odds ratio = 13.64, P = 0.048). Monotherapy with fluoroquinolones inactive against the S. maltophilia isolates was mainly responsible for the inappropriate treatment. These results suggest that more precise prediction and more appropriate treatment might improve the prognosis of patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia.

Prevalence of Smqnr and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants in clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from Japan: novel variants of Smqnr

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an important pathogen in healthcare-associated infections. S. maltophilia may contain Smqnr, a quinolone resistance gene encoding the pentapeptide repeat protein, which confers low-level quinolone resistance upon expression in a heterologous host. We investigated the prevalence of Smqnr and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) determinants in S. maltophilia isolates from Japan. A total of 181 consecutive and nonduplicate clinical isolates of S. maltophilia were collected from four areas of Japan. The antimicrobial susceptibility profiles for these strains were determined. PCR was conducted for Smqnr and PMQR genes, including qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrS,aac(6′)-Ib and qepA. PCR products for Smqnr and aac(6′)-Ib were sequenced. For the S. maltophilia isolates containing Smqnr, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed using XbaI. Resistance rates to ceftazidime, levofloxacin, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol and minocycline were 67.4%, 6.1%, 17.7%, 8.8% and 0%, respectively. The minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit the growth of 50% and 90% of organisms were 0.5 and 2 mg/L for moxifloxacin but 1 and 4 mg/L for levofloxacin, respectively. Smqnr was detected in 104 of the 181 S. maltophilia isolates (57.5%), and the most frequent was Smqnr6, followed by Smqnr8 and Smqnr11. Eleven novel variants from Smqnr48 to Smqnr58 were detected. The 24 Smqnr-containing S. maltophilia isolates were typed by PFGE and divided into 21 unique types. Nine S. maltophilia isolates (5.0%) carried aac(6′)-Ib-cr. No qnr or qepA genes were detected. This study describes a high prevalence of Smqnr and novel variants of Smqnr among S. maltophilia from Japan. Continuous antimicrobial surveillance and further molecular epidemiological studies on quinolone resistance in S. maltophilia are needed.

Evaluation of meropenem regimens suppressing emergence of resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii with human simulated exposure in an in vitro intravenous-infusion hollow-fiber infection model

The emergence of resistance to carbapenems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be suppressed by optimizing the administration of meropenem. However, whether the same is true for Acinetobacter baumannii is not fully understood. We assessed the bactericidal activity of meropenem and its potency to suppress the emergence of resistance in A. baumannii with human simulated exposure in an in vitro intravenous-infusion hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Two clinical strains of carbapenem-susceptible multidrug-resistant A. baumannii (CS-MDRAB), CSRA24 and CSRA91, were used, and their MICs and mutant prevention concentrations (MPCs) were determined. Six meropenem dosage regimens (0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 g given every 8 h [q8h] with a 0.5-h or 3-h infusion for seven consecutive days) were simulated and then evaluated in the HFIM. Both the total population and resistant subpopulations of the two strains were quantified. Drug concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. All dosage regimens, except for the lowest dosage (0.5 g for both the 0.5-h and 3-h infusions), showed 3-log CFU/ml bacterial killing. Dosage regimens of 2.0 g with 0.5-h and 3-h infusions exhibited an obvious bactericidal effect and suppressed resistance. Selective amplification of subpopulations with reduced susceptibility to meropenem was suppressed with a percentage of the dosage interval in which meropenem concentrations exceeded the MPC (T>MPC) of ≥20% or with a ratio of T>MPC to the percentage of the dosage interval in which drug concentrations are within the mutant selection window of ≥0.25. Our in vitro data support the use of a high dosage of meropenem (2.0 g q8h) for the treatment of severe infection caused by CS-MDRAB.

Can levofloxacin be a useful alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treating Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia?

A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of levofloxacin in the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia. The 30-day mortality rates were similar between the trimerthoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and levofloxacin treatment groups. Adverse events related to antibiotics occurred more frequently in patients receiving TMP-SMX, and recurrent bacteremia due to levofloxacin-resistant S. maltophilia strains developed in patients treated with levofloxacin. Our data suggest that levofloxacin can be a useful alternative option for treating S. maltophilia infections.

Rapidly progressive fatal hemorrhagic pneumonia caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in hematologic malignancy

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is rare, but can be lethal in severely immunocompromised patients. However, its clinical course remains unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with pneumonia caused by S. maltophilia in Toranomon Hospital (890 beds, Tokyo, Japan) were reviewed retrospectively between April 2006 and March 2010.

RESULTS

During the study period, 10 cases of S. maltophilia pneumonia were identified. Seven patients had acute myeloid leukemia, 2 had myelodysplastic syndrome, and 1 had malignant lymphoma. All patients developed symptoms after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Five patients received first cord blood transplantation (CBT), 4 patients received second CBT, and 1 patient received first peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). The overall incidence of S. maltophilia pneumonia among 508 patients who received HSCT during the period was 2.0%. The incidence was 0% (0/95) in patients after bone marrow transplantation, 0.8% (1/133) after PBSCT, and 3.2% (9/279) after CBT. Pneumonia developed a median of 13.5 days (range, 6-40) after transplantation. At onset, the median white blood cell count was 10/μL (range, 10-1900), and the median neutrophil count was 0/μL (range, 0-1720). In all patients, S. maltophilia bacteremia developed with bloody sputum or hemoptysis. The 28-day mortality rate was 100%; the median survival after onset of pneumonia was 2 days (range, 1-10).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemorrhagic S. maltophilia pneumonia rapidly progresses and is fatal in patients with hematologic malignancy. Attention should be particularly paid to the neutropenic phase early after HSCT or prolonged neutropenia due to engraftment failure. A prompt trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-based multidrug combination regimen should be considered to rescue suspected cases of S. maltophilia pneumonia in these severely immunosuppressed patients.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an emerging global opportunistic pathogen

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging multidrug-resistant global opportunistic pathogen. The increasing incidence of nosocomial and community-acquired S. maltophilia infections is of particular concern for immunocompromised individuals, as this bacterial pathogen is associated with a significant fatality/case ratio. S. maltophilia is an environmental bacterium found in aqueous habitats, including plant rhizospheres, animals, foods, and water sources. Infections of S. maltophilia can occur in a range of organs and tissues; the organism is commonly found in respiratory tract infections. This review summarizes the current literature and presents S. maltophilia as an organism with various molecular mechanisms used for colonization and infection. S. maltophilia can be recovered from polymicrobial infections, most notably from the respiratory tract of cystic fibrosis patients, as a cocolonizer with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Recent evidence of cell-cell communication between these pathogens has implications for the development of novel pharmacological therapies. Animal models of S. maltophilia infection have provided useful information about the type of host immune response induced by this opportunistic pathogen. Current and emerging treatments for patients infected with S. maltophilia are discussed.

A multicenter surveillance of antimicrobial resistance on Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has emerged as an important opportunistic pathogen in debilitated hosts. Clinical management of S. maltophilia is challenging due to its intrinsic resistance to a variety of antibiotics. This study investigated the trend and prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in S. maltophilia from a nationwide surveillance study in Taiwan.

METHODS

S. maltophilia isolates were collected biennially between 1998 and 2008 as part of the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) program from medical centers and regional hospitals throughout Taiwan. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were determined using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reference broth microdilution method.

RESULTS

A total of 377 non-duplicate S. maltophilia isolates were collected from 38 hospitals. The majority of the isolates were from the respiratory tract (256, 67.9%), followed by blood (48, 12.7%). Overall, 376 (99.7%) isolates were susceptible to minocycline, 362 (96%) to tigecycline, 311 (82.5%) to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), 300 (79.6%) to levofloxacin, 92 (24.4%) to ceftazidime, and 70 (18.6%) to ticarcillin-clavulanic acid. The MIC(50)/MIC(90) of minocycline, tigecycline, TMP-SMX, levofloxacin, ceftazidime, and ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, were ≤0.5/1 μg/mL, 0.25/1 μg/mL, ≤0.25/8 μg/mL, 1/4 μg/mL, 32/128 μg/mL, and 64/128 μg/mL, respectively. A trend of increased non-susceptibility to levofloxacin (p=0.014) was observed over the 10-year study period. Compared to TMP-SMX-susceptible isolates, TMP-SMX-resistant isolates were less susceptible to levofloxacin (54.5% vs. 84.9%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this 10-year study, minocycline and TMP-SMX remained the two antimicrobials with better in vitro activities against S. maltophilia than ceftazidime, levofloxacin, and ticarcillin-clavulanic acid. The activity of levofloxacin against S. maltophilia in Taiwan declined during the past 10 years.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the respiratory tract of medical intensive care unit patients

The purpose of this study was to investigate characteristics of critically ill patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) isolated from the respiratory tract, to identify risk factors for S. maltophilia-pneumonia and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and to analyze antibiotic susceptibility of S. maltophilia. This was a retrospective analysis of 64 medical ICU patients with S. maltophilia in the respiratory tract. Thirty-six patients fulfilled the criteria for diagnosis of pneumonia. A significantly higher lung injury score (LIS) was observed in patients with pneumonia compared to patients with colonization (p=0.010). Independent risk factors for S. maltophilia-pneumonia were higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (p=0.009) and immunosuppression (p=0.014). Patients with S. maltophilia-pneumonia had higher ICU mortality within a 28-day follow-up (p=0.040) and higher hospital mortality (p=0.018) than patients with colonization. The highest antibiotic susceptibility rates were observed to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tigecycline, and moxifloxacin. Higher SOFA score when S. maltophilia was isolated (p=0.001) and development of renal failure (p=0.021) were independent risk factors for ICU mortality. Higher SOFA score and immunosuppression are independent risk factors for S. maltophilia-pneumonia. Patients with S. maltophilia-pneumonia have a significantly higher ICU mortality within a 28-day follow-up, hospital mortality and LIS compared to patients with S. maltophilia-colonization.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia drug resistance

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has emerged in recent years as a paradigm of an intrinsically resistant, opportunistic bacterial pathogen with an environmental origin. The recent publication of the sequences of two S. maltophilia genomes has shown that this bacterium contains a large repertoire of antibiotic resistance determinants, probably contributing to its characteristic susceptibility to antibiotics. Among those determinants, the best characterized are a number of multidrug efflux pumps, β-lactamases and aminoglycoside-inactivating enzymes. Recently, the presence of a gene coding for a Qnr determinant in the genome of S. maltophilia has also been described. Together, these elements confer resistance to several of the drugs currently used for treating infections. Besides these chromosomally encoded determinants, which evolved in S. maltophilia long before the recent human use of antibiotics, this bacterial species is acquiring novel resistance genes by horizontal gene transfer, thereby increasing its resistance. Future studies are required to fully understand the mechanisms of resistance, their regulation and potential crosstalk with S. maltophilia virulence, as well as the population dynamics of the different isolates of this bacterial species.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an emerging opportunist human pathogen

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has emerged as an important opportunistic pathogen in the debilitated host. S maltophilia is not an inherently virulent pathogen, but its ability to colonise respiratory-tract epithelial cells and surfaces of medical devices makes it a ready coloniser of hospitalised patients. S maltophilia can cause blood-stream infections and pneumonia with considerable morbidity in immunosuppressed patients. Management of infection is hampered by high-level intrinsic resistance to many antibiotic classes and the increasing occurrence of acquired resistance to the first-line drug co-trimoxazole. Prevention of acquisition and infection depends upon the application of modern infection-control practices, with emphasis on the control of antibiotic use and environmental reservoirs.

Antibiotic resistance--what's dosing got to do with it?

OBJECTIVE

This review seeks to identify original research articles that link antibiotic dosing and the development of antibiotic resistance for different antibiotic classes. Using this data, we seek to apply pharmacodynamic principles to assist clinical practice for suppressing the emergence of resistance. Concepts such as mutant selection window and mutant prevention concentration will be discussed.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register.

STUDY SELECTION

All articles that related antibiotic doses and exposure to the formation of antibiotic resistance were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The escalation of antibiotic resistance continues worldwide, most prominently in patients in intensive care units. Data are emerging from in vitro and in vivo studies that suggest that inappropriately low antibiotic dosing may be contributing to the increasing rate of antibiotic resistance. Fluoroquinolones have widely been researched and publications on other antibiotic classes are emerging. Developing dosing regimens that adhere to pharmacodynamic principles and maximize antibiotic exposure is essential to reduce the increasing rate of antibiotic resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic dosing must aim to address not only the bacteria isolated, but also the most resistant subpopulation in the colony, to prevent the advent of further resistant infections because of the inadvertent selection pressure of current dosing regimens. This may be achieved by maximizing antibiotic exposure by administering the highest recommended dose to the patient.

Therapeutic options for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections beyond co-trimoxazole: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has emerged as an important opportunistic pathogen, causing infections whose management is often problematic due to its inherent resistance to many antibiotics, making co-trimoxazole the main therapeutic option. However, there are cases in which either due to antimicrobial resistance or allergic reactions and intolerance to co-trimoxazole this antibiotic cannot be administered. We sought to evaluate the available clinical evidence regarding potentially effective alternative antibiotics for the treatment of S. maltophilia infections.

METHODS

The literature search was performed in the PubMed and Scopus databases. The search string used was 'Stenotrophomonas maltophilia OR Xanthomonas maltophilia'.

RESULTS

Thirty-one case reports and 5 case series were retrieved including a total of 49 patients with a variety of infections. Twenty of 49 cases (40.8%) were treated with ciprofloxacin as monotherapy or in combination with other antibiotics; 12 of 49 cases (24.5%) were treated with ceftriaxone- or ceftazidime-based regimens; and 6 of 49 cases (12.2%) were treated with ticarcillin- or ticarcillin/clavulanate-based regimens. The cure or improvement rates were 18 cases (90%), 8 (75%) and 4 (66.7%), respectively. The remaining 11 patients received various antimicrobials including aminoglycoside-based regimens, carbapenems, levofloxacin, chloramphenicol, aztreonam, minocycline and other beta-lactams.

CONCLUSIONS

The limited available data suggest that ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime or ceftriaxone, and ticarcillin/clavulanate, alone or in combination with other antibiotics, may be considered as alternative options beyond co-trimoxazole.

Antimicrobial therapy for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has emerged as an important nosocomial pathogen capable of causing respiratory, bloodstream, and urinary infections. The treatment of nosocomial infections by S. maltophilia is difficult, as this pathogen shows high levels of intrinsic or acquired resistance to different antimicrobial agents, drastically reducing the antibiotic options available for treatment. Intrinsic resistance may be due to reduced outer membrane permeability or to the multidrug efflux pumps. However, specific mechanisms of resistance such as aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes or the heterogeneous production of metallo-beta-lactamase have contributed to the multidrug-resistant phenotype displayed by this pathogen. Moreover, the lack of standardized susceptibility tests and their interpretative criteria hinder the choice of an adequate antibiotic treatment. Recommendations for the treatment of infections by S. maltophilia are based on in vitro studies, certain nonrandomized clinical trials, and anecdotal experience. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole remains the drug of choice, although in vitro studies indicate that ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, minocycline, some of the new fluoroquinolones, and tigecycline may be useful agents. This review describes the main resistance mechanisms, the in vitro susceptibility profile, and treatment options for S. maltophilia infections.

Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance

Antibiotic resistance continues to plague antimicrobial chemotherapy of infectious disease. And while true biocide resistance is as yet unrealized, in vitro and in vivo episodes of reduced biocide susceptibility are common and the history of antibiotic resistance should not be ignored in the development and use of biocidal agents. Efflux mechanisms of resistance, both drug specific and multidrug, are important determinants of intrinsic and/or acquired resistance to these antimicrobials, with some accommodating both antibiotics and biocides. This latter raises the spectre (as yet generally unrealized) of biocide selection of multiple antibiotic-resistant organisms. Multidrug efflux mechanisms are broadly conserved in bacteria, are almost invariably chromosome-encoded and their expression in many instances results from mutations in regulatory genes. In contrast, drug-specific efflux mechanisms are generally encoded by plasmids and/or other mobile genetic elements (transposons, integrons) that carry additional resistance genes, and so their ready acquisition is compounded by their association with multidrug resistance. While there is some support for the latter efflux systems arising from efflux determinants of self-protection in antibiotic-producing Streptomyces spp. and, thus, intended as drug exporters, increasingly, chromosomal multidrug efflux determinants, at least in Gram-negative bacteria, appear not to be intended as drug exporters but as exporters with, perhaps, a variety of other roles in bacterial cells. Still, given the clinical significance of multidrug (and drug-specific) exporters, efflux must be considered in formulating strategies/approaches to treating drug-resistant infections, both in the development of new agents, for example, less impacted by efflux and in targeting efflux directly with efflux inhibitors.

Antibiotic combinations significantly more active than monotherapy in an in vitro infection model of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

The goal of this study was to investigate clinical doses of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) alone and in combination against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model. A 1-compartment model was established using 4 clinical isolates of S. maltophilia susceptible to TMP-SMX and susceptible or intermediately susceptible to at least one other agent (ie, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, tobramycin). Antibiotics alone and in combination were tested by simulating unbound serum concentration profiles achieved with multiple-dose regimens in humans. Despite susceptible minimum inhibitory concentrations, TMP-SMX alone was bacteriostatic at best against all isolates. All antibiotic combinations were more active than monotherapy as determined by bacterial reductions at both 24 and 48 h (P < 0.0001). Significant benefit was observed even with agents inactive alone or only intermediately susceptible based on minimum inhibitory concentrations. These preclinical data support further investigation of antibiotic combinations in the management of serious S. maltophilia infections.