Randomized comparison of serum teicoplanin concentrations following daily or alternate daily dosing in healthy adults

Evaluation of a thrice weekly administration of teicoplanin in the outpatient setting: a retrospective observational multicentre study

Introduction

The glycopeptide teicoplanin is commonly utilized to facilitate outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). Licensed for once daily maintenance dosing, teicoplanin’s long half-life allows for less frequent dosing (e.g. thrice weekly) following successful loading. This service evaluation reviews the safety and effectiveness of a novel thrice weekly teicoplanin dosing regimen.

Methods

A retrospective, observational study was conducted at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital (March 2018 to July 2020), evaluating trough serum teicoplanin concentrations for patients receiving >5 days of teicoplanin in the OPAT setting. Teicoplanin dosing and administration (once daily versus thrice weekly), clinical outcomes and therapeutic levels were analysed for all patients. The project was registered with clinical governance locally.

Results

A total of 82 patients treated with teicoplanin in the OPAT service were included; 53/82 receiving thrice weekly and 29/82 receiving once daily dosing. Mean teicoplanin trough levels were similar in both groups (26.2 mg/L and 25.8 mg/L in once daily and thrice weekly groups, P = 0.8895). High clinical success rates were recorded in both groups (25/29 [86.2%] versus 50/53 [94.3%]). No correlation with clinical outcomes and initial teicoplanin serum levels was identified. Normal renal function (>90 mL/min) was associated with lower teicoplanin serum concentrations (mean [±SD] 21.4 mg/L [±10.1] versus 29.7 mg/L [±14], P = 0.0178) in the thrice weekly dosed group but not with the once daily dosed group (mean [±SD] 28.2 mg/L [±9.4] versus 23.7 mg/L [±9.9], P = 0.2201).

Conclusions

This study supports thrice weekly teicoplanin as a convenient and effective OPAT for administration in the OPAT setting. Therapeutic drug monitoring is advised to adjust for intra-patient variability.

Antibiotic prophylaxis with teicoplanin on alternate days reduces rate of viridans sepsis and febrile neutropenia in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Intensive chemotherapy directed against acute myeloid leukemia of childhood is followed by profound neutropenia and high risk for bacterial and fungal infections, including viridans group streptococci as a common cause for gram-positive septicemia. Few retrospective studies have shown the efficacy of various antibiotic prophylactic regimens in children. We retrospectively studied 50 pediatric patients treated on the AML-BFM 2004 protocol between 2005 and 2015 at St. Anna Children's Hospital and assessed the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on the frequency of febrile neutropenia and bacterial sepsis. Fifty pediatric patients underwent 199 evaluable chemotherapy cycles. Viridans sepsis occurred after none of 98 cycles with prophylactic administration of teicoplanin/vancomycin in comparison to 12 cases of viridans sepsis among 79 cycles without systemic antibacterial prophylaxis (0 vs. 15 %, p < 0.0001). In addition, there were significantly fewer episodes of febrile neutropenia in the teicoplanin/vancomycin group (44 % vs. no prophylaxis 82 %, p < 0.0001). Severity of infection seemed to be worse when no antibiotic prophylaxis had been administered with a higher rate of intensive care unit treatment (0/98, 0 %, vs. 4/79, 5 %, p = 0.038). So far, no increase of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus isolates in surveillance cultures was noticed. Antibiotic prophylaxis with teicoplanin (or vancomycin) appears safe and feasible and resulted in eradication of viridans sepsis and decreased incidence of febrile neutropenia in pediatric AML patients. The possibility to administer teicoplanin on alternate days on an outpatient basis or at home could contribute to patient's quality of life and decrease health care costs.

Consensus document on controversial issues in the diagnosis and treatment of prosthetic joint infections

BACKGROUND

Joint replacement surgery has been on the increase in recent decades and prosthesis infection remains the most critical complication. Many aspects of the primary prevention and clinical management of such prosthesis infections still need to be clarified.

CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES

The aim of this GISIG (Gruppo Italiano di Studio sulle Infezioni Gravi) working group - a panel of multidisciplinary experts - was to define recommendations for the following controversial issues: (1) Is a conservative surgical approach for the management of prosthetic joint infections effective? (2) Is the one-stage or the two-stage revision for the management of prosthetic joint infections more effective? (3) What is the most effective treatment for the management of prosthetic joint infections due to methicillin-resistant staphylococci? Results are presented and discussed in detail.

METHODS

A systematic literature search using the MEDLINE database for the period 1988 to 2008 of randomized controlled trials and/or non-randomized studies was performed. A matrix was created to extract evidence from original studies using the CONSORT method to evaluate randomized clinical trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for case-control studies, longitudinal cohorts, and retrospective studies. The GRADE method for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendation was applied.

Teicoplanin levels in bone and joint infections: Are standard doses subtherapeutic?

OBJECTIVES

Previously published data suggest that a trough serum teicoplanin level of > or = 20 mg/l is predictive of improved outcomes in serious staphylococcal infection. We investigated how dose regimen and patient characteristics impact on trough teicoplanin levels in patients with musculoskeletal infection, in order to help standardise teicoplanin use.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data for 141 clinically stable adults with bone and joint infection treated as outpatients with teicoplanin. Patients with end stage renal failure were excluded.

RESULTS

The most frequently used teicoplanin dose regimens were 400 mg or 600 mg i.v. once daily. Trough levels were available for 78% of episodes, of which 51% were > or = 20 mg/l. Unsurprisingly, a level of > or = 20 mg/l occurred more often with a dose of 600 mg than with lower doses (p=0.005). There was no significant relationship between teicoplanin level and age, body weight or creatinine clearance, but male gender was associated with lower trough levels than female gender (p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that teicoplanin levels of > or = 20 mg/l for bone and joint infection in stable adult patients are best achieved with a daily dose of at least 600 mg.