Variation in performance of the serum bactericidal test

Serum bactericidal titres for monitoring antimicrobial therapy: current status and potential role in the management of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections

BACKGROUND

Serum bactericidal titres (SBTs) were widely used in the 1970s and 1980s to monitor antimicrobial therapy but are now seldom recommended. It is the only laboratory test that integrates drug pharmacodynamics, host pharmacokinetics and synergistic or antagonistic interactions of antimicrobial combinations into a single index of antimicrobial activity. We hypothesized that SBTs could play a renewed role in monitoring antibiotic treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. However, the last critical appraisal of the test was published over 30 years ago.

OBJECTIVES

This narrative review provides an updated assessment of the SBT test and its methodological limitations. We performed a diagnostic meta-analysis to estimate the value of SBTs for predicting clinical failure or death during antibiotic treatment.

SOURCES

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed including all English publications was performed in December 2019 using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH search terms "serum", "bactericidal", "inhibitory", "titre", "monitoring", "anti-infective agents" "antimicrobial therapy" and "therapeutic drug monitoring").

CONTENT

Although standardized methods for performing SBTs were approved in 1999, the test remains labour intensive, and results may not be available until 72 hr. However, the use of non-culture-based endpoints (i.e. spectrophotometric or fluorescent) may shorten test time to 24 hr. Despite considerable heterogeneity in published studies, a meta-analysis of 11 evaluable studies published from 1974 to 2007 indicated a critical SBT result (peak SBT ≤1:8 or trough ≤1:2) is associated with a diagnostic odds ratio for clinical failure during antibiotic treatment of 12.27 (95% confidence interval 5.28-28.54) and a 5.32 (95% 1.32-21.42) odds of death.

IMPLICATIONS

SBTs have prognostic value for identifying patients at high risk for antibiotic treatment failure, but the slow turnaround time of the current test limits its clinical utility. Standardization of a more rapid SBT testing method is needed.

Polymyxin Combination Therapy and the Use of Serum Bactericidal Titers in the Management of KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections: A Report of 3 Cases

Management of patients with KPC-harboring Enterobacteriaceae has become a significant and challenging scenario. We report three cases of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia that were successfully treated using combination therapy with polymyxin B and other antimicrobials. Serum bactericidal titers were determined and provided additional clinical guidance in the management of such patients.

Rifampin combination therapy for nonmycobacterial infections

The increasing emergence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), has resulted in the increased use of rifampin combination therapy. The data supporting rifampin combination therapy in nonmycobacterial infections are limited by a lack of significantly controlled clinical studies. Therefore, its current use is based upon in vitro or in vivo data or retrospective case series, all with major limitations. A prominent observation from this review is that rifampin combination therapy appears to have improved treatment outcomes in cases in which there is a low organism burden, such as biofilm infections, but is less effective when effective surgery to obtain source control is not performed. The clinical data support rifampin combination therapy for the treatment of prosthetic joint infections due to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) after extensive debridement and for the treatment of prosthetic heart valve infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Importantly, rifampin-vancomycin combination therapy has not shown any benefit over vancomycin monotherapy against MRSA infections either clinically or experimentally. Rifampin combination therapy with daptomycin, fusidic acid, and linezolid needs further exploration for these severe MRSA infections. Lastly, an assessment of the risk-benefits is needed before the addition of rifampin to other antimicrobials is considered to avoid drug interactions or other drug toxicities.

Serum bactericidal activity of trovafloxacin, in combination with cefepime or amikacin, in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the phamacokinetics and serum bactericidal activities (SBAs) of trovafloxacin, cefepime and amikacin alone and trovafloxacin in combination with cefepime or amikacin, so that the most favorable combination with trovafloxacin can be determined.

METHODS

In this open, randomized, crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers (six females, six males; mean age +/- SD, 25.1 +/- 2.6 years) received an infusion of either 300 mg of alatrovafloxacin or 2000 mg of cefepime or 6 mg/kg body weight amikacin alone, or 300 mg of alatrovafloxacin plus 2000 mg of cefepime or plus 6 mg/kg body weight amikacin. The SBAs against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus (11 strains each), Citrobacter freundii and Acinetobacter spp. (10 strains each) 1, 10 and 24 h after drug administration were measured by a standard microdilution method. Concentrations of trovafloxacin, cefepime and amikacin in serum and urine were analyzed before and up to 10 and 12 h, respectively, after drug infusion.

RESULTS

Significant synergistic effects on SBA were observed with the combination of trovafloxacin and cefepime against P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and Acinetobacter spp. 1 h after drug administration, and against Citrobacter freundii 1, 10 and 24 h after drug administration. The combination of trovafloxacin and amikacin showed significant synergistic effects against P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and C. freundii 1 h after drug administration. The combination of trovafloxacin and cefepime was, in general, more active than the combination of trovafloxacin and amikacin. No significant differences in the serum concentrations of trovafloxacin were observed between single and combined administration. However, the maximal concentration of cefepime was significantly lower when it was used in combination with trovafloxacin.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests a favorable interaction between trovafloxacin and cefepime. This combination showed more synergistic bactericidal activity against most of the test strains compared to the combination of trovafloxacin and amikacin. However, for P. aeruginosa, the bactericidal activity of cepefime alone was higher than that of the combination with trovafloxacin.

Levofloxacin pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal activities against five enterobacterial species

After oral administration of 500 mg of levofloxacin to 12 volunteers, we investigated the pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal activities (SBAs) against five strains of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Pharmacokinetic data were as follows: maximum concentration in serum, 6.36 +/- 0.57 mg/liter; area under the concentration-time curve, 43.6 +/- 6.23 mg. h/liter; elimination half-life 4.23 +/- 0.87 h. SBAs were present for 24 h against Escherichia coli and Citrobacter freundii. The SBAs at 1, 12, and 24 h after administration against E. coli were 1:108, 1:29, and 1:7, respectively, and those against Citrobacter freundii were 1:74, 1:25, and 1:7, respectively. The SBAs were present for 12 h against the other three organisms tested. The SBAs against Serratia marcescens were 1:28 and 1:9 at 1 and 12 h, respectively; the SBAs against Klebsiella pneumoniae were 1:25 and 1:7 at 1 and 12 h, respectively; and the SBAs against Enterobacter cloacae were 1:24 and 1:10 at 1 and 12 h, respectively.

Serum bactericidal activities and comparative pharmacokinetics of meropenem and imipenem-cilastatin

The pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal activities (SBAs) of imipenem and meropenem were investigated in a randomized crossover study. Twelve healthy male volunteers received a constant 30-min infusion of either 1 g of imipenem plus 1 g of cilastatin or 1 g of meropenem. The concentrations of the drugs in serum and urine were determined by bioassay and high-pressure liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters were based on an open two-compartment model and a noncompartmental technique. At the end of infusion, the mean concentrations of imipenem and meropenem measured in serum were 61.2 +/- 9.8 and 51.6 +/- 6.5 mg/liter, respectively; urinary recoveries were 48.6% +/- 8.2% and 60.0% +/- 6.5% of the dose in 12 h, respectively; and the areas under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity were 96.1 +/- 14.4 and 70.5 +/- 10.3 mg.h/liter, respectively (P < or = 0.02). Imipenem had a mean half-life of 66.7 +/- 10.4 min; that of meropenem was 64.4 +/- 6.9 min. The volumes of distribution at steady state of imipenem and meropenem were 15.3 +/- 3.3 and 18.6 +/- 3.0 liters/70 kg, respectively, and the mean renal clearances per 1.73 m2 were 85.6 +/- 17.6 and 144.6 +/- 26.0 ml/min, respectively. Both antibiotics were well tolerated in this single-dose administration study. The SBAs were measured by the microdilution method of Reller and Stratton (L. B. Reller and C. W. Stratton, J. Infect. Dis. 136:196-204, 1977) against 40 clinically isolated strains. Mean reciprocal bactericidal titers were measured 1 and 6 h after administration. After 1 and 6 h the median SBAs for imipenem and meropenem, were 409 and 34.9 and 97.9 and 5.8, respectively, against Staphylococcus aureus, 19.9 and 4.4 and 19.4 and 4.8, respectively, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 34.3 and 2.2 and 232 and 15.5, respectively, against Enterobacter cloacae, and 13.4 and 2.25 and 90.7 and 7.9, respectively, against Proteus mirabilis. Both drugs had rather short biological elimination half-lives and a predominantly renal route of elimination. Both carbapenems revealed high SBAs against clinically important pathogens at 1 h; meropenem had a higher SBA against E. cloacae and P. mirabilis, and the SBA of imipenem against S. aureus was greater than the SBA of meropenem.

Comparative pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal activities of SCE-2787 and ceftazidime

Ceftazidime and the new SCE-2787 are parenteral cephalosporins with a broad antimicrobial spectrum. Pharmacokinetics, serum bactericidal activities, and side effects were investigated in a randomized crossover study. A total of 12 healthy volunteers received a 20-min infusion of 1.5 g of SCE-2787 or 2.0 g of ceftazidime. Serum and urine concentrations were determined by the bioassay method and by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). The mean (+/- standard deviation) drug concentrations in serum at the end of infusion of SCE-2787 and ceftazidime were 124.4 +/- 23.8 and 233.1 +/- 54.1 mg/liter, respectively. The urine recovery of SCE-2787 was 87.8% +/- 5.5% of dose in 24 h and for ceftazidime was 85.8% +/- 6.3% of dose in 24 h. Metabolites of SCE-2787 could not be detected by HPLC in serum or urine. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated both with a noncompartmental analysis and on the basis of an open two-compartment model (drugs are administered into and eliminated from a central compartment only. However, reversible drug distribution from the central space occurs simultaneously into one peripheral space). The area under the concentration time curve from 0 h to infinity of SCE-2787 was 197.9 +/- 25.4 mg.h/liter, and that of ceftazidime was 334.2 +/- 40.0 mg.h/liter. SCE-2787 had a mean terminal half-life in the elimination phase of 109.0 +/- 15.3 min, while that of ceftazidime was 99.0 +/- 13.4 min. The volume of distribution at steady state of SCE-2787 was 17.1 +/- 1.6 liters/70 kg, and that of ceftazidime was 122.9 +/- 1.3 liters/70 kg. The mean residence time of SCE-2787 was 136.4 +/- 15.4 min, and that of ceftazidime was 122.9 +/- 12.7 min. The renal clearance per. 1.73 m2 of SCE-2787 was 103.1 +/- 12.3 ml/min, and that of ceftazidime was 80.6 +/- 13.2 ml/min. The serum bactericidal activities were measured with the microdilution method of Stratton and Reller (L. B. Reller and C. W. Stratton, J. Infect. Dis. 136:196-204, 1977) against 40 clinically isolated strains. One hour after administration, we measured mean reciprocal bactericidal titers of SCE-2787 and ceftazidime, respectively, against Escherichia coli of 388 and 243, against Klebsiella pneumoniae of 395 and 138, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa of 13.0 and 12.7, and against Staphylococcus aureus of 32.2 and 4.0. No severe side effects were observed in this single drug administration.

Tests for bactericidal effects of antimicrobial agents: technical performance and clinical relevance

Bactericidal testing has been used for several decades as a guide for antimicrobial therapy of serious infections. Such testing is most frequently performed when bactericidal antimicrobial agent therapy is considered necessary (such as when treating infectious endocarditis or infection in an immunocompromised host). It has also been used to ensure that the infecting organism is killed by (not tolerant to) usually bactericidal compounds. However, few data are available to support the role of such tests in direct patient care. Several important variables affect the reproducibility of the test results; however, proposed reference methods are now available for performing the MBC test. With minor modifications, these can provide a standardized approach for laboratories that need to perform them. Currently, little evidence is available to support the routine use of such testing for the care of individual patients. However, testing of new (investigational) antimicrobial agents can be beneficial in determining their potential to provide bactericidal antimicrobial activity during clinical use. New methods to assess bactericidal activity are being developed, but as yet none have been rigorously tested in patient care settings; further, for most of these methods, little information is available as to which technical parameters affect their results. In clinical laboratories, all bactericidal tests must be performed with rigorously standardized techniques and adequate controls, bearing in mind the limitations of the currently available test procedures.

Serum bactericidal test

The serum bactericidal test represents one of the few in vitro tests performed in the clinical microbiology laboratory that combines the interaction of the pathogen, the antimicrobial agent, and the patient. Although the use of such a test antedates the antimicrobial era, its performance, results, and interpretation have been subject to question and controversy. Much of the confusion concerning the serum bactericidal test can be avoided by an understanding of the various factors which influence bactericidal testing. In addition, the methodologic aspects of the serum bactericidal test have recently been addressed and should place this test on firmer ground. New information on the clinical utility of this test is becoming available; additional data are needed to establish more clearly the usefulness of the serum bactericidal test in specific infections. Such clinical trials from multiple centers will enable firmer recommendations for the future use of the serum bactericidal test.

Multicenter collaborative evaluation of a standardized serum bactericidal test as a predictor of therapeutic efficacy in acute and chronic osteomyelitis

Forty-eight episodes of osteomyelitis, 30 acute and 18 chronic, were evaluated in a prospective multicenter collaborative study to determine whether a standardized serum bactericidal test could predict outcome of infection. All centers used a microdilution test method that defined the recognized important test variables, including inoculum size, culture medium, dilution technique, incubation time, method of subculture, and bactericidal endpoint. In patients with acute osteomyelitis, peak serum bactericidal titers had no predictive value; however, trough titers of 1:2 or greater accurately predicted cure, whereas trough titers of less than 1:2 predicted therapeutic failure. In patients with chronic osteomyelitis, peak serum bactericidal titers of 1:16 or greater and trough titers of 1:4 or greater accurately predicted cure, whereas peak titers of less than 1:16 and trough titers of less than 1:2 accurately predicted failure. It is concluded that this standardized serum bactericidal test provides good prognostic information in patients with osteomyelitis, and it is recommended that patients with acute osteomyelitis have serum bactericidal titers of 1:2 or greater at all times and that patients with chronic osteomyelitis have serum bactericidal titers of 1:4 or greater at all times.

Value of the serum bactericidal test in management of patients with bacterial endocarditis

A review is given of the available clinical data on the prognostic value of the serum bactericidal test in the treatment of patients with bacterial endocarditis. It is concluded that the test, even when performed in a standardized manner, does not provide useful information for the majority of patients with bacterial endocarditis. Until further clinical data are available, routine performance of the test in patients with bacterial endocarditis is not recommended.

Technical aspects and clinical correlations of the serum bactericidal test

A review of the studies using 50% human serum as a diluent for the serum bactericidal test has shown correlations with patient outcome. Human serum used as diluent of the patient's serum appears to be essential because of high protein binding of some antibiotics. An inoculum of 10(5)-10(6) bacteria/ml and a bactericidal criteria of 99.9% killing are technical aspects that have gained popularity. Careful timing of serum collection for the assay is important. Neither the macrotube nor microtiter techniques are entirely satisfactory. The latter method, however, has the advantage of being more reproducible than the macrotube method, less cumbersome and requiring less serum. Preliminary guidelines for performing and interpreting the test are provided. Future research should be directed toward making the microtiter technique more sensitive for identifying antibiotic tolerance, developing effective methods to eliminate the need for human serum as a diluent and obtaining more clinical correlations.

Multicenter collaborative evaluation of a standardized serum bactericidal test as a prognostic indicator in infective endocarditis

One hundred twenty-nine patients with bacterial endocarditis were evaluated in a multicenter collaborative study to determine whether a standardized serum bactericidal test could predict the outcome of the infection. All centers used a microdilution test method that defined all known test variables, including inoculum size, culture medium, dilution technique, incubation time, method of subculture, and bactericidal endpoint. Peak serum bactericidal titers of 1:64 or more and trough serum bactericidal titers of 1:32 or more predicted bacteriologic cure in all patients. The traditionally recommended serum bactericidal titer of 1:8 had statistically significant predictive accuracy at trough antibiotic levels only. The serum bactericidal test was a poor predictor of bacteriologic failure and ultimate clinical outcome, which depends on many factors. Wider recognition by physicians and clinical microbiologists that this in vitro test of antimicrobial activity can accurately predict bacteriologic success but cannot accurately predict either bacteriologic failure or clinical outcome could lead to a better consensus about its appropriate use. On the basis of the results of this study, peak serum bactericidal titers of 1:64 or more and trough serum bactericidal titers of 1:32 or more are recommended to provide optimal medical therapy for infective endocarditis.

Adult chronic osteomyelitis

Distinctions between hematogenous, traumatic, and contiguous forms of chronic osteomyelitis are noted, and treatment discussed on the basis of the literature and of protocols of the adult osteomyelitis service at the University of Texas Medical Branch.

The usefulness of the serum bactericidal test in orthopedic infections

The serum bactericidal test is proposed as a means to monitor the effectiveness of antibiotic therapy in orthopedic cases. Preliminary results of a multicenter study of the test in osteomyelitis suggest that trough titers yield the best indication of successful treatment.

Principles of antibiotic therapy

Many host factors influence both the presentation and response to therapy of clinical infections. Since the selection of an appropriate antibiotic depends significantly upon results of in vitro susceptibility testing, great care should be taken to obtain suitable specimens for culture and susceptibility studies. The likelihood that antibiotic therapy will be successful depends upon whether the drug will reach the infected site at the desired concentration and for an optimal duration of time. Local factors such as pH, oxygen tension, and the presence of inactivating substances may affect antibiotic activity. At present, many of our recommendations for dose, dosage intervals, and duration of therapy are largely empiric. Enhanced understanding of the pharmacokinetics of antimicrobial agents should provide the basis for more rational therapy in the future. The remainder of this symposium will present the data from which such recommendations can be drawn.

Use and interpretation of Schlichter's test on Haemophilus influenzae: relation of in vitro to in vivo results for cefamandole

When Haemophilus influenzae infections are treated by an antibiotic acting on the bacterial wall, the adequacy of antimicrobial therapy can be assessed by Schlichter's test. This test may be carried out using Mueller Hinton broth (or Mueller Hinton broth with 50% pooled serum and a supplement of Ca++ and Mg++) supplemented with Fildes' enrichment and an inoculum adjusted to the 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard diluted 200x. However, correct reading of end points can be obtained only by phase contrast microscopic examination, which allows the establishment of good correlation between the in vitro and in vivo findings. In patients with lung infections successfully treated with cefamandole, the presence of spheroplasts in samples derived from Schlichter's tests correlates well with clinical improvement and eradication of the pathogenic organism checked by transtracheal aspiration.

Comparison of a micromethod for performance of the serum bactericidal test with the standard tube dilution method

A micromethod for performance of the serum bactericidal test is described, and the results obtained with this method are compared with those obtained with the standard tube dilution macromethod. An agreement within +/- 1 dilution was achieved in 23 of 25 (92%) determinations of the serum bactericidal titer. The micromethod used approximately one-third of the amount of pooled normal human serum and of the technician's time required for performance of the macromethod. The micromethod offers an accurate and economical alternative to the macromethod for the performance of the serum bactericidal test and is particularly useful with infants and children since it minimizes blood loss.

Persistent bacteremia in staphylococcal endocarditis

We treated five patients with persistent Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis. Surgical intervention or a "second-line" antistaphylococcal agent was required for bacteriologic cure in each. Special bacteriologic evaluation failed to demonstrate methicillin resistance or antibiotic "tolerance" among the strains of Staphylococcus tested. Cephalosporin agents were noted to be more susceptible to inoculum effect than either methicillin or nafcillin. All patients survived; the explanation for their atypical course is obscure. We present an approach to patients with persistent Staph. aureus bacteremia and endocarditis.

Potentiation of antibiotic bactericidal activity by normal human serum

Combinations of certain antibiotics and normal human serum at concentrations at which there was no killing by the agents when used alone were found to be bactericidal for Escherichia coli K-12 cells. This effect was observed with tetracycline, streptomycin (SM), trimethoprim, and ampicillin, but not with chloramphenicol or nalidixic acid. Synergy between SM and human serum was also observed against four of nine smooth strains of E. coli. A plasmid-bearing strain of E. coli K-12 was also killed by combinations of tetracycline or SM plus serum, even though the plasmid conferred resistance to tetracycline and SM. Evidence is presented that the synergy between antibiotics and serum is due to a complement-mediated effect on the bacterial cells that makes the cells more susceptible to the bactericidal effects of the antibiotics.

Indications, interpretation and applications of antibiotic assays

Routine monitoring of serum levels is imperative when antibiotics are given to patients with impairment of renal function. Other desirable indications include: need for assessment of adequate aminoglycoside levels in the initial management of severe infection; chloramphenicol therapy; need for control of bioavailability of new drugs or of new derivatives of known compounds; specific clinical situations (unexplained therapeutic failure, assessment of the oral use of antibiotics as an adequate therapy in patient with severe infections; appraisal of the innocuity of topical antibiotics in burned patients or in patients with liver or renal insufficiency). The serum antibacterial test is highly recommended for assessing the adequency of antibiotic therapy in patients with bacterial endocarditis and in infected patients with impaired host resistance such as those with leukopenia. Control of initial treatment in any severe infection, osteomyelitis (particularly when combined antibiotics are used) and tuberculosis are other indications of this test. Any attempt to correlate the results yielded by antibiotic assays with in-vivo effectiveness must take into account the patient himself and the several unknown factors which, in each individual case, can affect the ultimate result of the antibiotic therapy, such as antibiotic delivery to tissues, drug binding to cellular debris, intracellular penetration of the antibiotic, etc.

Clinical and laboratory studies of a new micronized preparation of hamycin in systemic mycoses in man

The use of serum rather than broth as the diluent in the serum bactericidal test results in a significant decrease in the test level among patients receiving highly protein-bound semisynthetic penicillins.