Salmonella Prevalence Is Strongly Associated with Spatial Factors while Listeria monocytogenes Prevalence Is Strongly Associated with Temporal Factors on Virginia Produce Farms

Methodological differences between studies confound one-size-fits-all approaches to managing surface waterways for food and water safety

Even though differences in methodology (e.g., sample volume and detection method) have been shown to affect observed microbial water quality, multiple sampling and laboratory protocols continue to be used for water quality monitoring. Research is needed to determine how these differences impact the comparability of findings to generate best management practices and the ability to perform meta-analyses. This study addresses this knowledge gap by compiling and analyzing a data set representing 2,429,990 unique data points on at least one microbial water quality target (e.g., Salmonella presence and Escherichia coli concentration). Variance partitioning analysis was used to quantify the variance in likelihood of detecting each pathogenic target that was uniquely and jointly attributable to non-methodological versus methodological factors. The strength of the association between microbial water quality and select methodological and non-methodological factors was quantified using conditional forest and regression analysis. Fecal indicator bacteria concentrations were more strongly associated with non-methodological factors than methodological factors based on conditional forest analysis. Variance partitioning analysis could not disentangle non-methodological and methodological signals for pathogenic Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Listeria. This suggests our current perceptions of foodborne pathogen ecology in water systems are confounded by methodological differences between studies. For example, 31% of total variance in likelihood of Salmonella detection was explained by methodological and/or non-methodological factors, 18% was jointly attributable to both methodological and non-methodological factors. Only 13% of total variance was uniquely attributable to non-methodological factors for Salmonella, highlighting the need for standardization of methods for microbiological water quality testing for comparison across studies.IMPORTANCEThe microbial ecology of water is already complex, without the added complications of methodological differences between studies. This study highlights the difficulty in comparing water quality data from projects that used different sampling or laboratory methods. These findings have direct implications for end users as there is no clear way to generalize findings in order to characterize broad-scale ecological phenomenon and develop science-based guidance. To best support development of risk assessments and guidance for monitoring and managing waters, data collection and methods need to be standardized across studies. A minimum set of data attributes that all studies should collect and report in a standardized way is needed. Given the diversity of methods used within applied and environmental microbiology, similar studies are needed for other microbiology subfields to ensure that guidance and policy are based on a robust interpretation of the literature.

Effects of Fumigation on the Reduction of Salmonella enterica in Soil

Due to the phaseout of methyl bromide (MeBr), there is a need for broad-spectrum soil fumigation alternatives for pest management. Little is known about the impact of fumigation alternatives on foodborne pathogens, such as Salmonella, in agricultural soils. This study investigated the effect of MeBr alternative fumigants on Salmonella reduction in soil. Sandy loam soil was collected from a conventional farmed vegetable field and inoculated with either Salmonella Newport J1892 or Typhimurium ATCC 14028 (5.9 ± 0.3 log10 colony-forming unit [CFU]/g). Each of the four fumigants labeled for pest management (1,3-dichloropropene, chloropicrin, dimethyl disulfide, and metam sodium) was applied at labeled maximum application field levels to soil in pots and stored for a 2-week period. Sterile water was used as a control. Following the 2-week period, Salmonella concentrations in soil samples were enumerated at 1, 7, 14, and 21 days postfumigation. The mean concentration of Salmonella Newport was significantly higher than that of Salmonella Typhimurium 1 day after fumigation (p = 0.015). Fumigation using 1,3-dichloropropene or dimethyl disulfide significantly reduced Salmonella Newport and Salmonella Typhimurium concentrations, compared with the sterile water control. The rate of Salmonella reduction in soil treated with dimethyl disulfide was higher (0.17 ± 0.02 log10 CFU/g/day), compared with soil treated with the other fumigants (0.10-0.12 log10 CFU/g/day). Due to the reduction of Salmonella, alternative fumigation treatments may mitigate potential Salmonella contamination in soil within farm environments.