Comparison of microbial counts on beef carcasses by using the moist-swab contact method and secondary tissue removal technique

Sampling methods for microbiological analysis of red meat and poultry carcasses

Microbiological analysis of carcasses at slaughterhouses is required in the European Union for evaluating the hygienic performance of carcass production processes as required for effective hazard analysis critical control point implementation. The European Union microbial performance standards refer exclusively to the excision method, even though swabbing using the wet/dry technique is also permitted when correlation between both destructive and nondestructive methods can be established. For practical and economic reasons, the swab technique is the most extensively used carcass surface-sampling method. The main characteristics, advantages, and limitations of the common excision and swabbing methods are described here.

Microbiological quality of chilled beef carcasses in Northern Ireland: a baseline survey

To standardize the assessment of the hygienic quality of beef carcasses in Northern Ireland (NI) abattoirs, swabbing techniques were evaluated. Six materials, including two commercially produced swabs, were compared for their ability to recover spoilage and pathogenic bacteria and for their ease of use as carcass swabs. A sponge retailed for domestic use was selected on the basis of efficiency of recovery of microorganisms, ease of use, and cost. On sample carcasses, 1,000 cm2 of the brisket was swabbed, since this site is normally readily contaminated. For 9 months, 420 carcasses in seven of the nine European Union-approved abattoirs in NI were sampled while in the chiller (24 to 48 h after kill). Total viable count (TVC), yeasts and molds, and Enterobacteriaceae were enumerated after incubation at 22 (48 h) and 37 degrees C (48 h), and the results were expressed as log CFU/cm2. The mean TVC results at 22 and 37 degrees C were 2.80+/-0.70 and 2.75+/-0.64, respectively. Although 63% of samples had yeasts that grew at 22 degrees C, only 35% were positive at 37 degrees C. The respective mean yeast counts were 1.12+/-0.59 and 0.46+/-0.51. Enterobacteriaceae were present in 15% of samples at 22 degrees C and 21% of samples at 37 degrees C. The mean counts for positive samples were 0.41+/-0.37 and 0.40+/-0.30, respectively. Molds were found in less than 4% of samples. Given that the brisket is normally one of the most heavily contaminated parts of the carcass, these results suggest that good hygienic practices are in operation in NI abattoirs. The results also enabled the abattoirs with the cleanest carcasses to be identified, hence permitting best practices to be found.

Microbiological sampling of meat cuts and manufacturing beef by excision or swabbing

Groups of 25 beef or pork loin primal cuts or of pieces of stored or not stored manufacturing beef were sampled by excision and by swabbing with cotton wool, sponge, and gauze. Total aerobic counts, coliforms, and Escherichia coli from each sample were enumerated. Values for the mean log10, log10 mean, and/or the log10 total numbers recovered were calculated for each set of 25 bacterial counts. Those statistics indicated that, for product sampled without storage, swabbing with cotton wool or sponge recovered about 30%, and swabbing with gauze recovered about 10% of the bacteria recovered by excision sampling; but that for product sampled after storage, swabbing with cotton wool or sponge recovered about 50% and swabbing with gauze recovered about 15% of the bacteria recovered by excision sampling. However, the incidences of samples positive for coliforms and E. coli were less for stored than for nonstored product with all methods of sampling. The findings indicate that the conditions of meat surfaces, the handling of product, and the state of the microflora might all affect the numbers of bacteria recovered by any sampling technique. Thus, the relationship between the numbers recovered by excision or any selected swabbing technique may differ for different types of noncomminuted, raw meat product.

Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing

Groups of 25 carcasses were obtained by random selection of carcasses at the end of each of eight commercial processes for the dressing or cooling of carcasses. Samples were collected from six groups of pig or beef carcasses by excision or swabbing with sponge, gauze, or cotton wool, with one sample obtained by each of the four methods from a separate, randomly selected site on each carcass. Total aerobic counts, coliforms, and Escherichia coli from each sample were enumerated. Values for the mean log10, log10 mean, and log10 total numbers recovered were calculated for each set of total aerobic counts. Those statistics indicated that the numbers of bacteria recovered by excision or swabbing with sponge or gauze were similar, while the numbers recovered by swabbing with cotton wool were at the lower end of or below the range of the numbers recovered by the other methods. The numbers of coliforms or E. coli recovered from carcasses by sampling areas up to 100 cm2 were too few for the estimation of log mean numbers. Sampling of two groups of carcasses by swabbing with gauze indicated that each 10-fold increase in the area sampled, from 10 to 1,000 cm2, approximately doubled the number of samples from which coliforms or E. coli were recovered. Sampling of six groups of carcasses from one process indicated that the sizes of swabs and volumes of diluent used for processing swabs did not have to be increased proportionally to the area of carcass surface sampled to recover numbers of E. coli proportional to the sampled area. It therefore appears that carcass sampling techniques can be varied widely without compromising the recovery of bacteria, and that the relative efficiencies with which bacteria are recovered by different techniques can be assessed by sampling each carcass in a group of 25 by each of the methods to be compared.