In vivo metabolism of 2,2'-diaminopimelic acid from gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial cells by ruminal microorganisms and ruminants and its use as a marker of bacterial biomass

Quantitative analysis of cellulose degradation and growth of cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen

Ruminant animals digest cellulose via a symbiotic relationship with ruminal microorganisms. Because feedstuffs only remain in the rumen for a short time, the rate of cellulose digestion must be very rapid. This speed is facilitated by rumination, a process that returns food to the mouth to be rechewed. By decreasing particle size, the cellulose surface area can be increased by up to 10(6)-fold. The amount of cellulose digested is then a function of two competing rates, namely the digestion rate (K(d)) and the rate of passage of solids from the rumen (K(p)). Estimation of bacterial growth on cellulose is complicated by several factors: (1) energy must be expended for maintenance and growth of the cells, (2) only adherent cells are capable of degrading cellulose and (3) adherent cells can provide nonadherent cells with cellodextrins. Additionally, when ruminants are fed large amounts of cereal grain along with fiber, ruminal pH can decrease to a point where cellulolytic bacteria no longer grow. A dynamic model based on STELLA software is presented. This model evaluates all of the major aspects of ruminal cellulose degradation: (1) ingestion, digestion and passage of feed particles, (2) maintenance and growth of cellulolytic bacteria and (3) pH effects.

[Evaluation of different markers for the determination of microbial nitrogen flow into the duodenum of dairy cows]

2,6-Diaminopimelic acid (DAPA), ribonucleic acid (RNA), 15N, D-alanine (D-ALA) and the amino acid profiles (AAP) were compared as microbial markers for determination of the microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. Three dairy cows (Schwarzbuntes Milchrind, LW 602 kg), each fitted with a rumen cannula and a re-entrant cannula in the proximal duodenum, were offered four isoenergetic and isonitrogenous diets (mean daily intake 15.0 +/- 0.45 kg DM; forage: concentrate = 50:50) in a periodic experiment. The diets contained soyabean extracted meal, meat and bone meal, pea meal and dried clover as major sources of protein. On the 4th day after administration of 9 g 15N-labelled urea (95 atom-% 15N-excess) per day, samples of rumen fluid and duodenal digesta were obtained 3 h after feeding. The bacteria were isolated by differential centrifugation. Bacteria harvested from the rumen had significantly higher 15N enrichment and D-ALA: N ratio than 'duodenal' bacteria. However, DAPA: N ratio was higher in 'duodenal' bacteria compared to rumen bacteria. There were no differences in RNA: N ratio between rumen and 'duodenal' bacteria. The source of the bacteria in the digestive tract has an influence on the ratio of microbial N: total N, especially when 15N, AAP, DAPA and D-ALA but not RNA were used as markers. The most reproducible method was D-ALA (C.V. 4.7 for rumen and 6.8 for 'duodenal' bacteria) followed by 15N (10.8 resp. 4.8) and RNA (9.7 resp. 8.2). The results obtained with 15N and D-ALA agreed closely at the same source of bacteria. The RNA method reached the level of these markers (15N, D-ALA) when the bacteria were isolated from the duodenum. It is concluded that D-ALA (bacteria isolated from rumen and duodenum) and also 15N (bacteria isolated from duodenum) were the best markers for estimation of the microbial protein synthesis.

Evaluation of chemical and physical properties of feeds that affect protein metabolism in the rumen

The goal of the NC-185 Cooperative Regional Research Project is to provide the information needed to improve the nutrition and feeding of dairy cattle, a major factor determining composition of milk and cost of milk yield. Emphasis is placed on understanding how energy and protein nutrition of lactating cows can be manipulated to increase the quantity and improve the profile of AA passing to the small intestine and to improve yield of milk and milk protein. To achieve this goal, one of the major objectives of this project has been to evaluate quantitatively the chemical and physical properties of protein and energy sources that determine AA availability to lactating cows. Reliable measurements of microbial protein synthesis and protein degradation in the rumen are critical in the evaluation process. Therefore, one of the ongoing areas of investigation of this research project has been to determine the most appropriate methods for estimating microbial protein synthesis and dietary protein degradation in the rumen. Other areas have been investigated, using continuous culture fermenters and ruminally and duodenally cannulated cows, including factors that alter microbial metabolism of N in the rumen and subsequently protein supply to the small intestine, such as sources of carbohydrate, protein, and fat and interrelationships of protein and carbohydrate. Findings of the NC-185 Cooperative Regional Research Project Committee and other investigators are summarized in this review.

Markers for quantifying microbial protein synthesis in the rumen

Measurement of ruminal microbial protein is necessary to quantify ruminal escape of dietary protein and microbial yields. Microbial markers used most widely have been the internal markers, diaminopimelic acid and nucleic acids (RNA, DNA, individual purines and pyrimidines, or total purines), and the external isotopic markers (e.g., 15N and 35S). Combined with digesta flow markers in ruminally and abomasally or intestinally cannulated ruminants, microbial yields can be estimated. An ideal marker system must account for both the bacterial and protozoal pools associated with both the fluid and particulate phases of digesta. No marker has proven completely satisfactory; hence, yield estimates are relative rather than absolute. Total purines represent robust microbial markers that should be adaptable by most investigators. Principal concerns about total purines relate to unequal purine: N ratios in protozoal and bacterial pools and to the need to assume that dietary purines are completely degraded in the rumen. A theoretically sounder, but more costly, method is continuous intraruminal infusion of 15N ammonium salts. However, 15N enrichments of bacterial and protozoal pools are not equal, so the basis for calculating microbial yield in faunated ruminants is uncertain. Urinary purine excretion may prove to be a noninvasive method for estimating microbial protein yields in intact dairy cows.