Method for sampling meat surfaces

Bacterial sampling techniques on beef, pork, and lamb adipose tissue

Two methods were used to evaluate bacterial recovery from beef, pork, and lamb adipose tissue. Higher counts were obtained with a tissue removal and fluid agitation technique (shaking) than with surface swabbing, but only when bacterial levels were low. Bacterial recovery by both methods was unaffected by specie origin of adipose tissue and differences in surface texture, sample storage time (12 versus 6 days), and duration fluid agitation (5 versus 10 min).

Method for Sampling Beef Carcasses

An instrument resembling a surgical dermatome, for microbiological sampling of beef carcasses, is described.

Comparison of microbial counts on beef carcasses by using the moist-swab contact method and secondary tissue removal technique

When a tissue removal rinse technique was compared to the moist-swab contact method, significantly greater numbers of bacteria were recovered from beef carcasses, especially when the flora exceeded log10 4.5/6.45 cm2. Secondary treatment of the removed surface tissue by blending resulted in a significantly greater number of bacteria being recovered than when the same sample was swabbed and/or rinsed. Data indicate that blending of the carcass surface tissue provides a more representative value of the true microbial flora.