Potential impact of different cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgM assays on an algorithm requiring IgM reactivity as a criterion for measuring CMV IgG avidity

Maternal Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Serology: The Diagnostic Limitations of CMV IgM and IgG Avidity in Detecting Congenital CMV Infection

INTRODUCTION

Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is a common congenital viral infection. Testing for cCMV usually begins with assessing maternal CMV serology, specifically IgM and IgG antibodies. A negative maternal CMV IgM suggests a low risk of recent maternal CMV infection, thereby suggesting a low risk of cCMV in the fetus. Consequently, cCMV is often ruled out when maternal CMV IgM is negative.

METHODS

In our perinatal autopsy and placental pathology database, we identified 5 cases of cCMV despite negative maternal CMV IgM results in the second trimester.

RESULTS

In all 5 cases, fetal abnormalities were first detected by ultrasound in the second trimester, prompting maternal CMV testing. Since second trimester maternal CMV IgM was negative in all cases, cCMV was considered unlikely, thus precluding further prenatal CMV testing in 4 of these cases. The diagnosis of cCMV was subsequently made through placental and/or autopsy examinations. Following this diagnosis, retrospective CMV serology and IgG avidity testing was performed on stored frozen first-trimester maternal blood samples in 3 cases. Among these, the first-trimester samples in 2 cases were IgG+, IgM+, and exhibited low IgG avidity, suggesting a primary maternal CMV infection around the time of conception. In the third case, both first and second-trimester maternal blood samples were IgG+, IgM-, and showed high IgG avidity, suggesting a non-primary maternal CMV infection (i.e., reactivation or reinfection of CMV).

CONCLUSION

A negative maternal CMV IgM in the second trimester cannot exclude cCMV infection. While CMV IgG avidity testing and analysis of stored frozen first-trimester maternal blood samples provide valuable insights, they have limitations. CMV PCR performed on amniotic fluid is a useful prenatal diagnostic tool. For cases of unexplained fetal abnormalities or death, autopsy and placental examination are recommended.

Maternal and congenital human cytomegalovirus infection: laboratory testing for detection and diagnosis

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the leading cause of congenital infection worldwide and the most common cause of non-genetic sensorineural hearing loss. As there is no vaccine or other specific intervention to prevent congenital CMV infection, there is a need to identify maternal and congenital infections with sensitive and specific testing as early as possible. There is no widely accepted practice for screening during pregnancy or in all newborns for identification of possible cases of congenital CMV. Currently, screening during pregnancy is limited to those identified as at risk followed by fetal and/or neonatal testing when congenital infection is suspected. This review focuses primarily on the current status of laboratory testing for diagnosis of maternal and congenital CMV infections. Primary maternal infection is best diagnosed using serologic testing, including CMV IgM, IgG, and avidity testing, while fetal infection should be assessed by nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) of amniotic fluid. Urine and saliva NAATs are the mainstay for diagnosis of congenital CMV in the first 3 weeks of life. Testing of dried blood spots can be useful for diagnosis of congenital CMV outside of the newborn period. The gaps in knowledge such as the prognostic value of viral loads in various sample types are addressed.

A systematic literature review of the global seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus: possible implications for treatment, screening, and vaccine development

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common pathogen that affects individuals of all ages and establishes lifelong latency. Although CMV is typically asymptomatic in healthy individuals, infection during pregnancy or in immunocompromised individuals can cause severe disease. Currently, treatments are limited, with no prophylactic vaccine available. Knowledge of the current epidemiologic burden of CMV is necessary to understand the need for treatment and prevention. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to describe the most recent epidemiologic burden of CMV globally.

Methods

Medline, Embase, and LILACS were searched to identify data on CMV prevalence, seroprevalence, shedding, and transmission rates. The SLR covered the time period of 2010–2020 and focused geographically on Australia, Europe, Israel, Japan, Latin America (LATAM), and North America. Studies were excluded if they were systematic or narrative reviews, abstracts, case series, letters, or correspondence. Studies with sample sizes < 100 were excluded to focus on studies with higher quality of data.

Results

Twenty-nine studies were included. Among adult men, CMV immunoglobulin G (IgG) seroprevalence ranged from 39.3% (France) to 48.0% (United States). Among women of reproductive age in Europe, Japan, LATAM, and North America, CMV IgG seroprevalence was 45.6-95.7%, 60.2%, 58.3-94.5%, and 24.6-81.0%, respectively. Seroprevalence increased with age and was lower in developed than developing countries, but data were limited. No studies of CMV immunoglobulin M (IgM) seroprevalence among men were identified. Among women of reproductive age, CMV IgM seroprevalence was heterogenous across Europe (1.0-4.6%), North America (2.3-4.5%), Japan (0.8%), and LATAM (0-0.7%). CMV seroprevalence correlated with race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and education level. CMV shedding ranged between 0% and 70.2% depending on age group. No findings on CMV transmission rates were identified.

Conclusions

Certain populations and regions are at a substantially higher risk of CMV infection. The extensive epidemiologic burden of CMV calls for increased efforts in the research and development of vaccines and treatments.

Trial registration

N/A.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13971-7.

Pitfalls in the Serological Evaluation of Maternal Cytomegalovirus Infection as a Potential Cause of Fetal and Neonatal Involvements: A Narrative Literature Review

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common cause of intrauterine infection and serological assays are the primary tools for assessing CMV infections during pregnancy. CMV-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies have been used as a diagnostic marker for primary CMV infection in pregnant women, although CMV-IgM has been detected in non-primary CMV infections. IgG avidity testing may aid the distinguishing of primary from non-primary CMV infection; however, there is no standardized assay for detecting this difference. Moreover, when maternal serology shows positive CMV-IgG with negative CMV-IgM findings, vertical transmission probability following primary CMV infection is often excluded. However, symptomatic congenital CMV infections in the context of negative findings for maternal CMV-IgM have been reported recently. The absence of CMV-IgM is recognized in both primary and non-primary CMV infections. Furthermore, maternal non-primary CMV infections during pregnancy may yield a greater proportion of symptomatic congenital CMV infections than previously thought. If universal prenatal screening is performed, ultrasonography for abnormal fetal findings should be conducted regardless of CMV-IgM antibody status. If not universally screened, CMV antibody screening should be performed whenever routine fetal ultrasound reveals abnormal findings. For suspected fetal CMV infection, amniotic fluid or postnatal infant urine CMV-DNA testing is required.

Pitfalls in the Serological Diagnosis of Primary Human Cytomegalovirus Infection in Pregnancy Due to Different Kinetics of IgM Clearance and IgG Avidity Index Maturation

Primary infection occurs when seronegative women are infected by human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). Diagnosis of primary infection is based on the following: antibody seroconversion, presence of IgM and low IgG avidity index (AI), and presence of DNAemia. The kinetics of HCMV-specific IgM antibody and maturation of AI might be very rapid or long-lasting during primary infection, which makes serological diagnosis insidious. The aims of this study were as follows: (i) to report atypical kinetics of HCMV-specific IgM antibody and AI early after onset of primary HCMV infection in a population of pregnant women, and (ii) to assess the frequency of such results. Altogether, 1309 sequential serum samples collected from 465 pregnant women with primary HCMV infection were included in the study. As a general rule, using the LIAISON^®CMVIgMII and LIAISON^®CMVIgGAvidityII assays, virus-specific IgM antibody levels decreased, while IgG AI increased over time during the first three months after infection onset. However, early clearance of IgM antibody and/or early IgG AI maturation occurred in 46/426 (10.7%) women. In more details, 20/426 (4.7%) and 26/418 (6.2%) women had undetectable IgM antibody or high IgG AI, respectively, when tested within 1-3 months after well-defined infection onset. Twenty sera from as many women with high IgG AI by the LIAISON assay were further tested for IgG AI by VIDAS^®CMVIgGAvidityII and Mikrogen recomLineCMVIgG Avidity assays. Comparable results were obtained with VIDAS, whereas 14/20 sera gave low AI with the Mikrogen assay. In conclusion, about 11% of pregnant women undergoing a primary HCMV infection showed misleading serological results. Additional and appropriate testing might help in reducing the risk of missing HCMV primary infection in pregnancy. Furthermore, preconceptional testing should be strongly recommended.

Impact of Syrian refugees on congenital TORCH infections screening in Turkey

AIM

To demonstrate the effect of the Syrian refugee population on the prevalence of congenital TORCH (Toxoplasmosis, Other [syphilis, varicella-zoster, parvovirus B19], Rubella, Cytomegalovirus [CMV] and Herpes) infections and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of population-based TORCH screening during pregnancy in Turkey.

METHODS

Pregnant women (n = 9754) were enrolled. Ultrasonographic findings, immunoglobulin (Ig)M and IgG seropositivity, avidity, amniocentesis and DNA-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results were compared. Costs were calculated based on invoice amounts from the Health Applications Communique pricing system.

RESULTS

The prevalence of TORCH seropositivity in Turkey was not significantly different between all regions (P > 0.05). Overall, 1333 (13.67%) pregnant Syrian refugees were included in the study. Acute CMV, rubella and Toxoplasma gondii infections (according to low IgG avidity in IgM positive patients) were detected in 17.82%, 21.53% and 14.07% of women, respectively. Twenty-four women underwent an amniocentesis procedure and nine of them had positive DNA-PCR and reverse transcription-PCR results. All women with positive results opted to terminate the pregnancy. There was no statistical difference among groups according to the rate of low IgG avidity in IgM-positive patients and termination rates for T. gondii, rubella and CMV (P > 0.05). Total cost for screening the entire study population was presented in US dollars (USD). A total of 71 529 and prenatal diagnosis with positive invasive test results were obtained in nine women: toxoplasmosis in four, CMV in three and rubella in two women.

CONCLUSION

Population-based screening for prenatal TORCH infections is not cost-effective in Turkey. Syrian refugees have a limited effect on the increasing prevalence of congenital TORCH infections.

Massive ascites and severe pulmonary hypoplasia in a premature infant with meconium peritonitis and congenital cytomegalovirus infection

Background: Meconium peritonitis (MP) is an infrequent prenatal complication. Association between MP and pulmonary hypoplasia has never been reported. Case Report: A female infant with antenatally diagnosed MP and ascites was delivered at 36 gestational weeks. She died shortly after birth due to pulmonary insufficiency. Autopsy confirmed the presence of MP and ascites, and additionally revealed intestinal malrotation, volvulus, necrosis and perforation, and pulmonary hypoplasia. Congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was also noted. This was an unexpected finding as the mother was tested negative for CMV IgM at 26 gestational weeks after sonographic detection of fetal ascites. Conclusions: This is the first reported case of lethal pulmonary hypoplasia in a neonate with MP-associated ascites complicated by congenital CMV infection. This case illustrates that a negative maternal CMV IgM might not be sufficient to rule out congenital CMV, and that a concomitant infectious etiology should always be considered even when a primary cause for fetal ascites (e.g., MP in this case) is identified.

Role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG avidity testing in diagnosing primary CMV infection during pregnancy

The risk of intrauterine transmission of cytomegalovirus (CMV) during pregnancy is much greater for women who contract primary CMV infection after conception than for women with evidence of infection (circulating CMV antibodies) before conception. Thus, laboratory tests that aid in the identification of recent primary CMV infection are important tools for managing the care of pregnant women suspected of having been exposed to CMV. CMV IgM detection is a sensitive marker of primary CMV infection, but its specificity is poor because CMV IgM is also produced during viral reactivation and persists following primary infection in some individuals. Studies conducted over the last 20 years convincingly demonstrate that measurement of CMV IgG avidity is both a sensitive and a specific method for identifying pregnant women with recent primary CMV infection and thus at increased risk for vertical CMV transmission. IgG avidity is defined as the strength with which IgG binds to antigenic epitopes expressed by a given protein; it matures gradually during the 6 months following primary infection. Low CMV IgG avidity is an accurate indicator of primary infection within the preceding 3 to 4 months, whereas high avidity excludes primary infection within the preceding 3 months. In this minireview, we summarize published data demonstrating the clinical utility of CMV IgG avidity results for estimating time since primary infection in pregnant women, describe commercially available CMV IgG avidity assays, and discuss some of the issues and controversies surrounding CMV IgG avidity testing during pregnancy.

Performance of a cytomegalovirus IgG enzyme immunoassay kit modified to measure avidity

The measurement of cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG avidity accurately discriminates recent and past CMV infections. We sought to determine if the Wampole Laboratories CMV IgG enzyme immunoassay (EIA) could be modified to measure avidity. The evaluation panel consisted of 156 serum samples we used in 2002 to validate a laboratory-developed EIA, in which 78 serum samples exhibited low avidity, 7 exhibited intermediate avidity, and 71 exhibited high avidity. The qualitative agreement between the two avidity assays was 94% (147/156); all 9 sera with discordant results exhibited intermediate avidity in one of the assays. The avidity index (AI) values in the two assays showed excellent correlation (r = 0.96, P < 0.0001). The definition of high avidity was verified for the Wampole assay by demonstrating high avidity in 91/93 (98%) recently collected CMV IgG-positive/IgM-negative serum samples. The performance of the Wampole avidity assay in a reference laboratory setting was assessed using 470 consecutive serum samples submitted for CMV IgG avidity testing. Surprisingly, 101 serum samples were negative when screened for CMV IgG using the Wampole kit per the package insert; 98 of these 101 serum samples were tested using a CMV IgG chemiluminescent immunoassay, and only 5 were positive. Of the 369 CMV IgG-positive samples, 6% exhibited low IgG avidity, 6% exhibited intermediate avidity, and 88% exhibited high avidity; CMV IgM detection rates were inversely related to AI levels. These findings show that (i) the Wampole CMV IgG EIA can be modified to measure CMV IgG avidity, (ii) many samples are apparently submitted for avidity testing without knowledge of their CMV IgG status, and (iii) most CMV IgG-positive sera submitted for avidity testing exhibit high avidity.