Safety of Recombinant Fusion Protein ESAT6-CFP10 as a Skin Test Reagent for Tuberculosis Diagnosis: an Open-Label, Randomized, Single-Center Phase I Clinical Trial

Cracking the antigenic code of mycobacteria: CFP-10/ESAT-6 tuberculosis skin test and misleading results

There are different tuberculosis diagnostic tools available that detect an antigen-specific immune response. The present study aims to evaluate the potential of cross-reactive responses of a CFP-10 and ESAT-6 antigen-based TB test using bioinformatics tools. The study found that the presence of the sequences coding for the CFP-10 and ESAT-6 antigens in mycobacterial genomes is not associated with their pathogenicity, and not even consistent within a single species among its strains, which can lead to either false positive or false negative test results. The data that was analyzed included genome assemblies of all available mycobacterial strains obtained from the NCBI Genome database, while the standalone BLAST and tblastn programs were utilized to detect the presence of the CFP-10 and ESAT-6 sequences. The findings revealed that a number of non-pathogenic mycobacteria contained the aforementioned sequences, while some pathogenic mycobacteria did not, indicating that a standard tuberculin skin test should be more preferable for detecting various pathogenic mycobacteria compared to antigen-specific tests. In the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), the proportion of positive strains varied within individual species, indicating a complex relationship. Among non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTMB), more than half of the analyzed species did not contain these sequences which is consistent with their non-pathogenicity. Further research is necessary to fully comprehend the relationship between MTBC pathogenicity and the CFP-10 and ESAT-6 sequences. This could lead to a conclusion that a standard tuberculin skin test, although non-specific due to the undefined antigen content, may be able to detect various pathogenic mycobacteria in a more reliable manner than antigen-specific tests.

Is the new tuberculous antigen-based skin test ready for use as an alternative to tuberculin skin test/interferon-gamma release assay for tuberculous diagnosis? A narrative review

In recent years, novel specific Mycobacteria tuberculous (TB) antigen-based skin test (TBST) has become available for clinical use. The mechanism of TBST is similar to the interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA), making it a potential alternative for identifying latent tuberculous infection (LTBI), especially in subjects with history of bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination. Three different commercial brands have been developed in Denmark, Russia, and China. Clinical studies in the respective countries have shown promising sensitivity, specificity, and safety profile. Some studies attempted to address the applicability of TBST in specific subject groups but the discrepancy in defining LTBI and problematic methodologies undermine the generalisation of the results to other communities across the world. Limited cost-effectiveness studies for TBST have been conducted without exploring the health economics for preventing development of LTBI into active TB. Unlike IGRA, no clinical studies have addressed the correlation of TBST results (magnitude of induration) with the likelihood of development of active TB. Moreover, the different TBSTs are not widely available for clinical use. While TBST is a promising test to overcome the shortcomings of tuberculin skin tests, more clinical data are needed to support its general application globally for the diagnosis of LTBI.

A Comparative Study on the Mechanism of Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Mediated by the Recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Fusion Protein ESAT6-CFP10 and Purified Protein Derivative

While purified protein derivative (PPD) is commonly used as skin diagnostic reagent for tuberculosis (TB) infection, it cannot distinguish effectively Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination from Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) complex and nontuberculous mycobacteria infection. The new skin reagent ESAT6-CFP10 (EC) has favorable sensitivity and specificity, which can overcome limitations associated with PPD. At present, EC skin test reactions are mainly characterized by erythema, while PPD mainly causes induration. We conducted a comparative study on the potential differences between EC-induced erythema and PPD-induced induration using a guinea pig model. The size of EC-dependent erythema was similar to that of PPD-induced induration, and an inflammatory response characterized by the infiltration of monocytes, macrophages and lymphocytes, as well as tissue damage, appeared at the injection site. The lymphocytes included CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells, which released IFN-γ as the main cytokine. Both EC erythema and PPD induration could lead to increased levels of acute-phase proteins, and the differential pathways were similar, thus indicating that the main induced immune pathways were similar. The above results indicated that erythema produced by EC could generate the main delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response characteristic of PPD induration, thereby suggesting that erythema might also have a certain diagnostic significance and provide a possible theoretical basis for its use as a diagnostic indicator for detecting MTB infection.

Evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of EC-Test for latent tuberculosis infection in ambulatory people with HIV

BACKGROUND

Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is more likely to develop into active tuberculosis (ATB), recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis fusion protein ESAT6/CFP10 (EC-Test) is a latest developed method for LTBI. Compared with the interferon γ release test assays (IGRAs), the diagnostic performance of EC-Test to LTBI screening in HIV needs to be evaluated.

METHODS

A population-based multicenter prospective study was conducted in Guangxi Province, China. The baseline data was collected and LTBI were measured by QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT), EC-Test and T-cell spot of the TB assay (T-SPOT.TB).

RESULTS

A total of 1478 patients were enrolled. when taking T-SPOT.TB as reference, the value of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and consistency that EC-Test to diagnosis LTBI in HIV was 40.42, 97.98, 85.26, 85.04 and 85.06% respectively; when taking QFT-GIT as reference, the value was 36.00, 92.57, 55.10, 85.09 and 81.13%, respectively. When the CD4 + cell count was <200 cells/μl, the accuracies of EC-Test to T-SPOT.TB and QFT-GIT were 87.12 and 88.89%, respectively; when it was 200 ≤ CD4 + ≤ 500 cells/μl, the accuracies of EC-Test was 86.20 and 83.18%, respectively; when the CD4 + cell count >500 cells/μl, the accuracies of EC-Test were 84.29 and 77.94%, respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions in EC-Test was 34.23% and the serious adverse reactions were 1.15%.

CONCLUSION

EC-Test has good consistency compared with IGRAs in detecting LTBI in HIV no matter in different immunosuppression status or different regions, and the safety of EC-Test is also well, suitable for LTBI screening in HIV in high prevalence settings.

A Systematic Review on the Safety of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Specific Antigen-Based Skin Tests for Tuberculosis Infection Compared With Tuberculin Skin Tests

Background

A systematic review showed that the accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen-based skin tests (TBSTs) for tuberculosis is similar to that of interferon γ release assay, but the safety of TBSTs has not been systematically reviewed.

Methods

We searched for studies reporting injection site reactions (ISRs) and systemic adverse events associated with TBSTs. We searched Medline, Embase, e-library, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database for studies through 30 July 2021, and the database search was updated until 22 November 2022.

Results

We identified 7 studies for Cy-Tb (Serum Institute of India), 7 (including 2 found through the updated search) for C-TST (Anhui Zhifei Longcom), and 11 for Diaskintest (Generium). The pooled risk of any injection site reactions (ISRs) due to Cy-Tb (n = 2931; 5 studies) did not differ significantly from that for tuberculin skin tests (TSTs; risk ratio, 1.05 [95% confidence interval, .70-1.58]). More than 95% of ISRs were reported as mild or moderate; common ISRs included pain, itching, and rash. In 1 randomized controlled study, 49 of 153 participants (37.6%) given Cy-Tb experience any systemic adverse event (eg, fever and headache), compared with 56 of 149 participants (37.6%) given TST (risk ratio, 0.85 [95% confidence interval, .6-1.2]). In a randomized controlled study in China (n = 14 579), the frequency of systemic adverse events in participants given C-TST was similar to that for TST, and the frequency of ISRs was similar to or lower than that for TST. Reporting of the safety data on Diaskintest was not standardized, precluding meta-analysis.

Conclusion

The safety profile of TBSTs appears similar to that of TSTs and is associated with mostly mild ISRs.

High accuracy of recombinant fusion protein early secretory antigenic target protein 6-culture filtrate protein 10 skin test for the detection of tuberculosis infection: a phase III, multi-centered, double-blind, hospital-based, randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To verify the diagnostic utility of recombinant fusion protein ESAT6-CPF10 (EC), a novel skin test reagent to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.

METHODS

A multi-centered, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 17, 2015, to March 2, 2018. Participants involved in this study included those with active tuberculosis (TB), suspected pulmonary TB, or non-TB pulmonary disease. Each participant received three tests simultaneously, TB-specific enzyme-linked immunospot assay (T-SPOT.TB), tuberculin skin test (TST), and EC skin test (ECST), and adverse events were reported.

RESULTS

Diagnostic accuracy was analyzed using data from 1085 protocol-compliant participants. The sensitivities of the ECST, TST, and T-SPOT.TB were 91.2% (95% CI, 89.0-93.2%), 91.4% (95% CI, 89.1-93.3%), and 92.1% (95% CI, 89.9-93.9%), respectively. The specificities of the ECST (69.7%, 95% CI, 64.5-74.5%) and T-SPOT.TB (76.1%, 95% CI, 71.2-80.5%) were significantly higher than the TST (54.4%, 95% CI, 48.9-59.7%). The agreements between ECST and TST (kappa = 0.632) and between ECST and T-SPOT.TB (kappa = 0.780) were substantial. No severe adverse event was reported.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of the ECST was close to the T-SPOT.TB assay in the detection of TB infection and indicated good potential for clinical application in common scenarios.

Safety of a Novel ESAT6-CFP10 skin test compared with tuberculin skin test in a double-blind, randomized, controlled study

Background

ESAT6-CFP10 (EC) skin test has been reported accurate and safe in identifying tuberculosis infection. We aimed to demonstrate the safety of EC skin test compared with tuberculin skin test (TST) in university freshmen.

Methods

We conducted a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical study in a university freshmen population with 16,680 participates in China, and finally 14,579 completed the study. About a half received an EC skin test and the others received TST. Adverse reactions were evaluated.

Results

Out of the 14,579 participants, 48.2% (7029/14,579) were males. The average age was 18.1 ± 0.8 years and the average BMI was 20.9 ± 3.1 kg/m². 50.4% (7351/14,579) participants received EC skin test and 49.6% (7228/14,579) received TST. The EC group had significantly less adverse reactions compared with the TST group (21.3%, 1565/7351 vs. 34.6%, 2499/7228, P = 0.000). The most common adverse reactions for EC were bleeding (5.63%, 414), dermatodyschroia (4.27%, 314), induration (3.90%, 287), swelling (2.49%, 183), pain (1.59%, 117) and pruritus (1.48%, 109). Bleeding, dermatodyschroia, swelling and erythema were significantly less in EC group (P < 0.05), while others were similar to those of TST.

Conclusion

the EC skin test was safe in our cohort. And its incidence of total adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is less than that of TST. Most adverse reactions were mild or moderate, lasting less than 48 h and self-limiting. Considering the satisfactory diagnostic accuracy in identifying tuberculosis infection, the cost and safety, the EC skin test might be a potential candidate for replacing TST in high burden countries or those with routine BCG vaccination. Clinical Trials Registration. ChiCTR2000038622, Safety of the EC skin test to screen tuberculosis infection in two universities, compared with the tuberculin skin test: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. registered on 26/09/2020 at http://www.chictr.org.cn.

Differential Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection and Active Tuberculosis: A Key to a Successful Tuberculosis Control Strategy

As an ancient infectious disease, tuberculosis (TB) is still the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent worldwide. Latent TB infection (LTBI) has been recognized as the largest source of new TB cases and is one of the biggest obstacles to achieving the aim of the End TB Strategy. The latest data indicate that a considerable percentage of the population with LTBI and the lack of differential diagnosis between LTBI and active TB (aTB) may be potential reasons for the high TB morbidity and mortality in countries with high TB burdens. The tuberculin skin test (TST) has been used to diagnose TB for > 100 years, but it fails to distinguish patients with LTBI from those with aTB and people who have received Bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccination. To overcome the limitations of TST, several new skin tests and interferon-gamma release assays have been developed, such as the Diaskintest, C-Tb skin test, EC-Test, and T-cell spot of the TB assay, QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube, QuantiFERON-TB Gold-Plus, LIAISON QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus test, and LIOFeron TB/LTBI. However, these methods cannot distinguish LTBI from aTB. To investigate the reasons why all these methods cannot distinguish LTBI from aTB, we have explained the concept and definition of LTBI and expounded on the immunological mechanism of LTBI in this review. In addition, we have outlined the research status, future directions, and challenges of LTBI differential diagnosis, including novel biomarkers derived from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and hosts, new models and algorithms, omics technologies, and microbiota.

Sensitivity, specificity, and safety of a novel ESAT6-CFP10 skin test for tuberculosis infection in China: two randomized, self-controlled, parallel-group phase 2b trials

BACKGROUND

Diagnostics to identify tuberculosis infection are limited. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety of the novel ESAT6-CFP10 (EC) skin test for tuberculosis infection in Chinese adults.

METHODS

We conducted two randomized, parallel-group clinical trials in healthy participants and tuberculosis patients. All participants were tested with the T-SPOT.TB test, then received EC skin test and tuberculin skin test (TST). The diameter of skin indurations and/or redness at injection sites were measured at different time periods. A Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) model was also established to assess the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection using EC skin test.

RESULTS

In total, 777 healthy participants and 96 tuberculosis patients were allocated to receive the EC skin test at 1.0μg/0.1ml or 0.5μg/0.1ml. The area under the curve was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.97) from the EC skin test at a dose of 1.0μg/0.1ml at 24-72 hours. Compared to the T-SPOT.TB test, the EC skin test demonstrated similar sensitivity (87.5, 95% CI 77.8-97.2 versus 86.5, 95% CI 79.5-93.4) and specificity (98.9, 95% CI 96.0-99.9 versus 96.1, 95% CI 93.5-97.8). Among BCG vaccinated participants, the EC skin test had high consistency with the T-SPOT.TB test (96.3, 95% CI, 92.0-100.0). No serious adverse events related to the EC skin test were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The EC skin test demonstrated both high specificity and sensitivity at a dose of 1.0μg/0.1ml, comparable to the T-SPOT.TB test. The diagnostic accuracy of the EC skin test was not impacted by BCG vaccination.

Induration or erythema diameter not less than 5 mm as results of recombinant fusion protein ESAT6-CFP10 skin test for detecting M. tuberculosis infection

Background

Recombinant fusion protein ESAT6-CFP10 (EC) is a newly developed skin test reagent for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) infection. In this study, we evaluated whether induration and erythema could be used as diagnostic indicators for EC skin test to detect M. tuberculosis infection.

Methods

A total of 743 tuberculosis patients and 1514 healthy volunteers underwent an EC skin test. The diameters of induration and erythema were measured with Vernier caliper, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after skin testing. Related indicators of EC reagent diagnostic test were tested, and the diagnostic effects of the four diagnostic indicators for EC skin test were compared.

Results

The sensitivity of induration / erythema measurement was lower at 24 h after EC skin test than at 48 h or 72 h (P<0.01). There was no difference in consistency (P = 0.16) between induration with clinical diagnosis, and erythema with clinical diagnosis at 48 h (88.88 and 90.16%, Kappa value was 0.75 and 0.78, respectively). In patients, the sensitivity of erythema measurement was higher than induration measurement (P<0.01). In healthy volunteers, the specificity of erythema measurement was lower than induration at 24 h after skin test, but there was no difference at 48 h after skin test (P = 0.22). In BCG vaccination volunteers, the specificity of induration and erythema were higher than 90%. In addition, there was a high consistency of induration and erythema. When induration or erythema was used as a positive diagnostic indicator, the sensitivity of the EC skin test was improved, and was no different from the other three indicators in terms of specificity and consistency with clinical diagnosis.

Conclusions

Induration or erythema diameter not less than 5 mm could be used as a diagnostic indicator for detecting M. tuberculosis infection.

Trial registration

Phase III clinical trial of recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESAT6-CFP10 allergen; CTR20150695; registered in December 16, 2015.

Enhancement of the stability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis recombinant antigen expressed in Escherichia coli using cell lysis additives

BACKGROUND

Mycobacteria tuberculosis (Mtb), the causative agent of tuberculosis, is a slow-growing bacterium. Expression in Escherichia coli is a widely used method for large-scale production of diagnostic antigenic recombinant proteins. Expression of Mtb antigen in E. coli offers a rapid and, inexpensive alternative to conventional protein synthesis from Mtb. The addition of stabilizing additives during cell lysis or storage of Mtb antigenic protein plays a vital role in enhancing antigen stability. In this study, we evaluated the effects of additives on the stability of Mtb antigens expressed in E. coli.

METHODS

Immunodominant Mtb antigens, i.e., CFP-10, Rv3872, TB7.7, and TB9.7, were cloned, and recombinant proteins overexpressed in E. coli were gradually degraded in a time-dependent manner by incubation at 37 °C. Various stabilizing additives during storage or cell lysis before protein purification were investigated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot analysis.

RESULTS

CFP-10 and Rv3872 were mainly expressed in soluble form. The degraded form of the expressed protein after incubation at 37 °C was easily observed after 1 week. Increased stability was observed in a solution containing glycine for recombinant CFP-10 and Rv3872. TB9.7 was stable in a solution containing trehalose or mannitol. TB7.7 was stable in a solution containing sucrose, glycine, or polyethylene glycol.

CONCLUSION

Recombinant Mtb antigen stabilization using chemical additives inhibited protein degradation, leading to increased antigen stability and purification efficiency.