Effect of methylprednisolone on bacterial clearance and endotoxin liberation during experimental sepsis induced by gram-negative bacteria

Methylprednisolone Induces Extracellular Trap Formation and Enhances Bactericidal Effect of Canine Neutrophils

Methylprednisolone is a glucocorticoid and can negatively influence immune defense mechanisms. During bacterial infections in the dog, neutrophils infiltrate infected tissue and mediate antimicrobial effects with different mechanisms such as phagocytosis and neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation. Here, we investigated the influence of methylprednisolone on canine NET formation and neutrophil killing efficiency of Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria. Therefore, canine blood derived neutrophils were treated with different concentrations of methylprednisolone over time. The survival factor of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, Streptococcus canis or Escherichia coli was determined in presence of stimulated neutrophils. Additionally, free DNA and nucleosomes as NET marker were analyzed in supernatants and neutrophils were assessed for NET formation by immunofluorescence microscopy. Methylprednisolone concentrations of 62.5 and 625 µg/mL enhanced the neutrophil killing of Gram positive bacteria, whereas no significant influence was detected for the Gram negative Escherichia coli. Interestingly, higher amounts of free DNA were detected under methylprednisolone stimulation in a concentration dependency and in the presence of Streptococcus canis and Escherichia coli. The nucleosome release by neutrophils is induced by bacterial infection and differs depending on the concentration of methylprednisolone. Furthermore, immunofluorescence microscopy analysis identified methylprednisolone at a concentration of 62.5 µg/mL as a NET inducer. In summary, methylprednisolone enhances NET-formation and time-dependent and concentration-dependent the bactericidal effect of canine neutrophils on Gram positive bacteria.

Beneficial effects of stress-dose corticosteroid therapy in canines depend on the severity of staphylococcal pneumonia

PURPOSE

The effects of stress-dose corticosteroid therapy were studied in a canine staphylococcal pneumonia model of septic shock.

METHODS

Immediately following intrabronchial bacterial challenge, purpose-bred beagles were treated with stress doses of desoxycorticosterone (DOC), a mineralocorticoid agonist, and dexamethasone (DEX), a glucocorticoid agonist, or with placebo for 96 h. Oxacillin (30 mg/kg every 8 h) was started 4 h after infection onset. Bacterial dose was titrated to achieve 80-90 % lethality (n = 20) using an adaptive design; additional animals (n = 18) were investigated using the highest bacterial dose.

RESULTS

Initial analysis of all animals (n = 38) demonstrated that the effects of DOC + DEX were significantly altered by bacterial dose (p = 0.04). The treatment effects of DOC + DEX were different in animals administered high or relatively lower bacterial doses in terms of survival (p = 0.05), shock reversal (p = 0.02), interleukin-6 levels (p = 0.02), and temperature (p = 0.01). DOC + DEX significantly improved the above parameters (p ≤ 0.03 for all) and lung injury scores (p = 0.02) after high-dose bacterial challenges, but not after lower challenges (p = not significant for all). Oxacillin trough levels were below the minimum inhibitory concentration of the infecting organism, and DOC + DEX increased the frequency of persistent staphylococcal bacteremia (odds ratio 3.09; 95 % confidence interval 1.05-9.11; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Stress-dose corticosteroids were only beneficial in cases of sepsis with high risk for death and even short courses may interfere with host mechanisms of bacterial clearance.

Antibiotic induced endotoxin release and clinical sepsis: a review

Sepsis and peritonitis have not lost much of their danger for patients. The mortality rate in peritonitis has only marginally decreased during the last 30 years despite aggressive surgical and sophisticated intensive care treatment. In intra-abdominal infection and peritonitis source control remains the mainstay of treatment, although general principles and denominators of successful source control need to be established. Endotoxin has been recognized as a major player in the pathogenesis of sepsis and its significance in clinical disease has been investigated in clinical studies for more than 20 years. Since the Sixties there is a growing interest in the effect of antibiotics and other compounds on the release of endotoxin. The effect of antibiotics on the release of endotoxin and inflammatory parameters, e.g., cytokines, remains to be clarified despite a growing body of in-vitro studies, animal studies and a few clinical studies. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the evidence of endotoxin release in clinical studies and the effect that antibiotic treatment may have in-vitro, in-vivo and in clinical studies on endotoxin and cytokine release. In-vitro antibiotic-induced endotoxin release may depend on antibiotic class, presence of serum, type of organism, site of antibiotic action and Gram-stain. Endotoxin release may be different in late or early lysis, proportional to the number of killed pathogens. Morphology of bacteria may have an impact on endotoxin release and phagocytosis. Antibiotic-treated animals may show higher endotoxin levels with a higher survival rate than untreated animals. Plasma endotoxin may increase despite decreasing bacteremia. There may be a similar killing rate by different antibiotics but a difference in endotoxin release. Intestinal endotoxin does not necessarily correlate to the level of gram-negative bacteria. However, the alteration of the gut content by pretreatment may be associated with reduced endotoxemia and increased survival. Antibiotic-induced endotoxin release may be different depending on the type of infection, the location of infection, the virulence of strains, Gram-stain, mode of application and dosage of antibiotic. Different antibiotics may induce the release of different forms of endotoxin which may be lethal for sensitized animals. The combination of antibiotics with inhibitors of endotoxin or the pro-inflammatory response may be responsible for increased survival by decrease of endotoxin release. The clinical significance of antibiotic-induced endotoxin release is documented only in a few clinical disorders, e.g., meningitis, urosepsis. The difference in endotoxin release by PBP 2-specific antibiotics, e.g., imipenem, and PBP 3-specific antibiotics, e.g., ceftazidime, may not be visible in each study. Patients with increased multi-organ failure (MOF) scores may profit from treatment with antibiotics known to decrease endotoxin. In conclusion, the clinical significance of antibiotic-induced endotoxin release remains to be clarified. Type of pathogen and its virulence may be more important than recently suggested. gram-positive pathogens were just recently recognized as an important factor for the development of the host response. In case of fever of unknown origin in intensive care patients either failure of treatment, e.g., failure of source control in intra-abdominal infection, or a side effect of antibiotic treatment, e.g., endotoxin release, should be considered as a cause of the fever.

Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on bacteraemia and endotoxaemia in an animal model of peritonitis

Laparoscopy is increasingly used in conditions complicated by peritonitis. A theoretical concern is that carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum may increase bacteraemia. This study examines the effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on bacteraemia, endotoxaemia and physiological correlates of sepsis in an animal model of peritonitis. New Zealand white rabbits were assigned to three groups of six animals. Group 1 received an intraperitoneal inoculation of 10(9) colony-forming units of Escherichia coli followed by a 10-cm midline laparotomy. Group 2 received an identical bacterial inoculum followed by a 12-mmHg carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for 1 h. Group 3 received no bacteria but had a 12-mmHg carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for 1 h. Groups 1 and 2 had significantly higher levels of bacteraemia (P < 0.01) and endotoxaemia (P < 0.01) accompanied by significantly lower mean arterial pressures (P < 0.05) and higher heart rates (P < 0.05) compared with group 3. After 6 h groups 1 and 2 were significantly hypocarbic (P < 0.01), leucopenic (P < 0.01) and thrombocytopenic (P < 0.01). There was no difference between group 1 and group 2. A carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum of 12 mmHg does not increase bacteraemia or endotoxaemia, nor does it adversely affect physiological or laboratory correlates of sepsis compared with laparotomy in this animal model of peritonitis.