The DdrR Coregulator of the Acinetobacter baumannii Mutagenic DNA Damage Response Potentiates UmuDAb Repression of Error-Prone Polymerases

Repression of Acinetobacter baumannii DNA damage response requires DdrR-assisted binding of UmuDAb dimers to atypical SOS box

The DNA damage response of the multi-drug-resistant nosocomial pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii possesses multiple features that distinguish it from the commonly used LexA repression system. These include the absence of LexA in this genus, the evolution of a UmuD polymerase manager into the UmuDAb repressor of error-prone polymerases, the use of a corepressor unique to Acinetobacter (DdrR), and an unusually large UmuDAb binding site. We defined cis- and trans-acting factors required for UmuDAb DNA binding and gene repression, and tested whether DdrR directly enhances its DNA binding. We used DNA binding assays to characterize UmuDAb's binding to its proposed operator present upstream of the six co-repressed umuDC or umuC genes. UmuDAb bound tightly and cooperatively to this site with ~10-fold less affinity than LexA. DdrR enhanced the binding of both native and dimerization-deficient UmuDAb forms, but only in greater than equimolar ratios relative to UmuDAb. UmuDAb mutants unable to dimerize or effect gene repression showed impaired DNA binding, and a strain expressing the G124D dimerization mutant could not repress transcription of the UmuDAb-DdrR regulon. Competition electrophoretic mobility shift assays conducted with mutated operator probes showed that, unlike typical SOS boxes, the UmuDAb operator possessed a five-base pair central core whose sequence was more crucial for binding than the flanking palindrome. The presence of only one of the two flanking arms of the palindrome was necessary for UmuDAb binding. Overall, the data supported a model of an operator with two UmuDAb binding sites. The distinct characteristics of UmuDAb and its regulated promoters differ from the typical LexA repression model, demonstrating a novel method of repression.IMPORTANCEAcinetobacter baumannii is a gram-negative bacterium responsible for hospital-acquired infections. Its unique DNA damage response can activate multiple error-prone polymerase genes, allowing it to gain mutations that can increase its virulence and antibiotic resistance. The emergence of infectious strains carrying multiple antibiotic resistance genes, including carbapenem resistance, lends urgency to discovering and developing ways to combat infections resistant to treatment with known antibiotics. Deciphering how the regulators UmuDAb and DdrR repress the error-prone polymerases could lead to developing complementary treatments to halt this mechanism of generating resistance.

DNA damage response coregulator ddrR affects many cellular pathways and processes in Acinetobacter baumannii 17978

Introduction

Acinetobacter baumannii strain 17978 is an opportunistic pathogen possessing a DNA damage response (DDR) in which multiple error-prone polymerase genes are co-repressed by a UmuD homolog, UmuDAb, and the small Acinetobacter-specific protein DdrR. Additionally, these regulators coactivate nine other genes. We identified the DNA damage-inducible transcriptome for wildtype, umuDAb, and recA strains, and later established the ddrR DDR transcriptome. However, the ATCC 17978 reference genome had several assembly errors and lacked the 44 kb virulence locus, AbaAL44, that is present in the strain 17978 UN.

Methods

For this project, we combined our earlier single-end read RNAseq data with the ddrR paired-end reads and aligned these data to the improved 17978 UN genome assembly that resembled our laboratory strain, 17978 JH.

Results

New DESeq2 analyses verified previous differentially expressed genes (DEGs) but also found 339 genes in 17978 JH that were not annotated or physically present in the older genome assembly. Sixty-three were differentially expressed after DNA damage, and 182 had differential basal expression when comparing umuDAb, ddrR, or recA strains to wildtype, with 94 genes' expression unchanged. This work identified and characterized the 55 gene DNA damage-repressible transcriptome, 98% of which required either umuDAb or ddrR for repression. Two-thirds of these DEGs required both regulators. We also identified 110 genes repressed only in the ddrR strain, ~50% of which were due to increased basal expression levels. Basal gene expression in the ddrR mutant was further dysregulated independent of the DDR. Over 800 genes were upregulated, and over 1200 genes were downregulated compared to wildtype expression. Half of A. baumannii's essential genes were upregulated in the ddrR strain, including cell division genes, and two-thirds of these were downregulated in the umuDAb strain.

Discussion

The ddrR mutant upregulated genes enriched in translation, RNA metabolism, protein metabolism, AA/FA/cell-structure synthesis, and transport, while downregulating genes enriched in quorum sensing, biofilm production, secretion systems, pilus production, cell adhesion, and aromatics and chlorine degradation. Our data underscore the need for accurate and appropriately matched genome assemblies and indicate that ddrR affects approximately 60% of the genome, rendering it a potential target for Acinetobacter baumannii infection treatment.