Activated RecA protein may induce expression of a gene that is not controlled by the LexA repressor and whose function is required for mutagenesis and repair of UV-irradiated bacteriophage lambda

New complexities of SOS-induced "untargeted" mutagenesis in Escherichia coli as revealed by mutation accumulation and whole-genome sequencing

When its DNA is damaged, Escherichia coli induces the SOS response, which consists of about 40 genes that encode activities to repair or tolerate the damage. Certain alleles of the major SOS-control genes, recA and lexA, cause constitutive expression of the response, resulting in an increase in spontaneous mutations. These mutations, historically called "untargeted", have been the subject of many previous studies. Here we re-examine SOS-induced mutagenesis using mutation accumulation followed by whole-genome sequencing (MA/WGS), which allows a detailed picture of the types of mutations induced as well as their sequence-specificity. Our results confirm previous findings that SOS expression specifically induces transversion base-pair substitutions, with rates averaging about 60-fold above wild-type levels. Surprisingly, the rates of G:C to C:G transversions, normally an extremely rare mutation, were induced an average of 160-fold above wild-type levels. The SOS-induced transversion showed strong sequence specificity, the most extreme of which was the G:C to C:G transversions, 60% of which occurred at the middle base of 5'GGC3'+5'GCC3' sites, although these sites represent only 8% of the G:C base pairs in the genome. SOS-induced transversions were also DNA strand-biased, occurring, on average, 2- to 4- times more often when the purine was on the leading-strand template and the pyrimidine on the lagging-strand template than in the opposite orientation. However, the strand bias was also sequence specific, and even of reverse orientation at some sites. By eliminating constraints on the mutations that can be recovered, the MA/WGS protocol revealed new complexities of SOS "untargeted" mutations.

The SOS Regulatory Network

All organisms possess a diverse set of genetic programs that are used to alter cellular physiology in response to environmental cues. The gram-negative bacterium, Escherichia coli, mounts what is known as the "SOS response" following DNA damage, replication fork arrest, and a myriad of other environmental stresses. For over 50 years, E. coli has served as the paradigm for our understanding of the transcriptional, and physiological changes that occur following DNA damage (400). In this chapter, we summarize the current view of the SOS response and discuss how this genetic circuit is regulated. In addition to examining the E. coli SOS response, we also include a discussion of the SOS regulatory networks in other bacteria to provide a broader perspective on how prokaryotes respond to DNA damage.

H2O2-induced cross-protection against UV-C killing in Escherichia coli is blocked in a lexA (Def) background

Pretreatment with 2.5 mM H2O2 protects E. coli cells against UV-C killing, a phenomenon independent of LexA cleavage. In this paper, we observe that this cross-protection response is neither dependent on the dinY gene product nor on the system that controls dinY, since H2O2 is able to induce cross-protection but not to induce the dinY gene in a lexA-noninducible strain [lexA (Ind-)]. Moreover, this response is not induced in a lexA (Def) background, suggesting that the expression of the SOS regulon may inhibit this cross-protection response.

Recovery of DNA replication in UV-damaged Escherichia coli

Following exposure to UV light DNA replication stops and then resumes. The SOS response is required for the restoration of replication. Replication recovery occurs in lexA(Ind) cells carrying a high constitutive level of RecA protein. Replication is also affected by UmuCD proteins, photoreactivation, and excision repair. In addition, there is a constitutive and recA independent way to replicate over UV photoproducts associated with the production of gaps in daughter DNA strands. There are two ways to account for the replication in UV-irradiated cells. A stalled replication fork can be reactivated. Alternatively, a replication fork could be destroyed irreparably, with no available way to complete the round of replication. In that case, postirradiation replication could be due exclusively to replication forks assembled de novo at the origin(s). Changes in replication initiation are observed following UV irradiation. Initiations are first inhibited and then stimulated. They become independent of de novo protein synthesis and sometimes do not stop in dnaA(ts) mutants shifted to 42 degrees C. Although the inducible functions are involved in the recovery of replication at different levels of UV damage, some modifications of the replication initiation mechanism appear to be specific to severely damaged cells. Such modifications seem to include the dnaA(ts) independence for initiations and the transient initiation inhibition. RecA protein can be directly involved both in the modification of initiation and in reactivation of the stalled replication forks. Although the restoration of replication depends on the SOS response a synthesis of some protein(s) that do not belong to the LexA regulon seems to be required as well. These proteins can be under RecA control and one of their functions may be to inhibit the rnhA gene. Certain recA mutations may selectively affect different mechanisms of the replication recovery (namely, recA430, recA727, recA718, recA1730). Overproduction of the photoreactivating enzyme in the dark could influence UmuCD activity in replication. The UmuCD function appears to be blocked in strains carrying the dnaE1026 mutation or overproducing the dnaQ protein. For some unknown reason the UmuCD-associated replication mechanism is the only one available for phage with damaged DNA.

Characterization of dinY, a new Escherichia coli DNA repair gene whose products are damage inducible even in a lexA(Def) background

Bacteriophage Mu dX(Ap lac) was used to isolate a mutation in an Escherichia coli lexA(Def) strain representing a previously undescribed gene (dinY) which does not seem to be under the direct control of LexA. The insertion created a dinY::lacZ fusion in which beta-galactosidase expression required a DNA-damaging treatment (UV irradiation or mitomycin) and activable RecA protein. This strain showed a decreased Weigle reactivation of bacteriophage lambda. However, it was fully inducible for UV mutagenesis. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis analysis identified two spots absent in the mutant which were both UV inducible only in the presence of activated RecA protein (RecA*). This finding suggests that the dinY::lacZ fusion lies in a gene either that is under the direct control of activated RecA or whose product undergoes RecA*-dependent posttranscriptional/posttranslational modification(s). The dinY gene may also control the expression of some other gene(s) and/or lie in an operon. The fusion was mapped at a position between 41 and 41.5 min on the E. coli chromosome, in the vicinity of the ruv operon.

New mutations in and around the L2 disordered loop of the RecA protein modulate recombination and/or coprotease activity

The RecA protein plays a key role in Escherichia coli recombination and DNA repair. We have created new recA mutants with mutations in the vicinity of the recA430 mutation (Gly-204----Ser) which is known to affect RecA coprotease activity. Mutants carrying recA659 or recA611, located 3 and 7 amino acids downstream of residue 204, respectively, lose all RecA activities, while the mutant carrying recA616, which is located at 12 amino acids from this residue, keeps the coprotease activity but is unable to promote recombination. Complementation experiments show that both mutations recA611 and recA659 are dominant over the wild-type or recA430 allele while recA616 seems to be recessive to recA+ and dominant over recA430. It is suggested that these mutations are located in RecA domains which direct conformational modifications.

Genetic evidence for an activator required for induction of pectin lyase in Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora by DNA-damaging agents

In Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora 71, the induction of pectin lyase (Pnl), the bacteriocin carotovoricin (Ctv), and cellular lysis (Lss) requires a RecA function. We obtained mutants wherein a pleiotropic defect, i.e., the lack of induction with mitomycin C, is not restored by the recA+ DNA. From a genomic library of strain 71, a cosmid (pAKC280) that restored induction of Pnl, Ctv, and Lss by mitomycin C was isolated. The activator function, designated Rdg for regulator of damage-inducible genes, was localized by subcloning and insertional mutagenesis to a 2.6-kb region within a 6.7-kb EcoRI fragment. An rdg-lacZ operon fusion was inducible by mitomycin C in RecA+ but not RecA- derivatives of E. carotovora subsp. carotovora 71 and Escherichia coli. A RecA+ E. coli strain carrying only a PnlA+ plasmid was not inducible for Pnl production; however, when both a PnlA+ plasmid and a Rdg+ plasmid were present, the transcription of pnlA and the production of the enzyme were activated by mitomycin C. The size of the pnlA transcript produced in E. coli was identical to that of the transcript produced by E. carotovora subsp. carotovora 71, suggesting that the same promoter and termination sequences were being utilized in these bacteria.

Inhibition of the recBCD-dependent activation of Chi recombinational hot spots in SOS-induced cells of Escherichia coli

Nucleotide sequences called Chi (5'-GCTGGTGG-3') enhance homologous recombination near their location by the RecBCD enzyme in Escherichia coli (Chi activation). A partial inhibition of Chi activation measured in lambda red gam mutant crosses was observed after treatment of wild-type cells with DNA-damaging agents including UV, mitomycin, and nalidixic acid. Inhibition of Chi activation was not accompanied by an overall decrease of recombination. A lexA3 mutation which blocks induction of the SOS system prevented the inhibition of Chi activation, indicating that an SOS function could be responsible for the inhibition. Overproduction of the RecD subunit of the RecBCD enzyme from a multicopy plasmid carrying the recD gene prevented the induced inhibition of Chi activation, whereas overproduction of RecB or RecC subunits did not. It is proposed that in SOS-induced cells the RecBCD enzyme is modified into a Chi-independent recombination enzyme, with the RecD subunit being the regulatory switch key.

DNA damage-inducible loci in Salmonella typhimurium

lac operon fusions to DNA damage-inducible (din) loci were generated in Salmonella typhimurium LT2. Many of these din fusions were efficiently repressed by cloned Escherichia coli LexA, while others were not; all required RecA for induction. Several din fusions exhibited strong inducibility and will be useful in developing an SOS induction assay in S. typhimurium to detect genotoxins.

UV induction of LexA independent proteins which could be involved in SOS repair

The SOS response is induced in E coli following treatments that interfere with DNA replication. The response is under the control of the recA and the lexA genes. Strains defective in LexA repressor constitutively express SOS proteins. However, SOS repair does not reach its maximum level in these strains. Instead, an activation of RecA protein and de novo protein synthesis are required for full repair. We have analyzed by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis the induction of proteins after UV irradiation of lexA(Def) bacteria. Proteins which might participate in SOS repair are induced under these conditions.

Genetic control of AAF-induced mutagenesis at alternating GC sequences: an additional role for RecA

In a previous study, the forward mutation spectrum induced by the chemical carcinogen N-acetoxy-N-2-acetylaminofluorene was determined (Koffel-Schwartz et al. 1984). It was found that 90% of the induced mutations are frameshift mutations located within specific sequences (mutation hot spots). Two classes of mutation hot spots were found: (i) -1 frameshift mutations occurring within runs of guanines (i.e. GGGG----GGG; (ii) -2 frameshift mutations occurring within the NarI recognition sequence (GGCGCC----GGCC). In the present work, we further investigate the genetic requirements of these frameshift events by using specific reversion assays. Like UV-induced mutagenesis, frameshift mutations occurring within runs of G's (also referred to as the "slippage pathway") require the activated form of the RecA protein (RecA*). On the other hand, frameshift mutations occurring at the NarI site (the "NarI mutation pathway") require a LexA-controlled function(s) that is not UmuDC. The LexA-controlled gene(s) that is (are) involved in this pathway remain to be identified. Moreover, this pathway does not require RecA* for the proteolytic processing of a protein other than LexA (like the cleavage of UmuD in UV-induced mutagenesis). An "additional" role of RecA can be defined as follows: (i) The non-activated form of the RecA protein acts as an inhibitor in the NarI mutation pathway. (ii) This inhibition is relieved upon activation of RecA by UV irradiation of the bacteria. (iii) A recA deletion mutant is totally proficient in the NarI mutation pathway provided the SOS system is derepressed [lexA (Def) allele]. Therefore, RecA does not actively participate in the fixation of the mutation. A molecular model for this "additional" role of RecA is proposed.

Nature of the SOS mutator activity: genetic characterization of untargeted mutagenesis in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, induction of the SOS functions by UV irradiation or by mutation in the recA gene promotes an SOS mutator activity which generates mutations in undamaged DNA. Activation of RecA protein by the recA730 mutation increases the level of spontaneous mutation in the bacterial DNA. The number of recA730-induced mutations is greatly increased in mismatch repair deficient strains in which replication errors are not corrected. This suggests that the majority of recA730-induced mutations (90%) arise through correctable, i.e. non-targeted, replication errors. This recA730 mutator effect is suppressed by a mutation in the umuC gene. We also found that dam recA730 double mutants are unstable, segregating clones that have lost the dam or the recA mutations or that have acquired a new mutation, probably in one of the genes involved in mismatch repair. We suggest that the genetic instability of the dam recA730 mutants is provoked by the high level of replication errors induced by the recA730 mutation, generating killing by coincident mismatch repair on the two unmethylated DNA strands. The recA730 mutation increases spontaneous mutagenesis of phage lambda poorly. UV irradiation of recA730 host bacteria increases phage untargeted mutagenesis to the level observed in UV-irradiated recA+ strains. This UV-induced mutator effect in recA730 mutants is not suppressed by a umuC mutation. Therefore UV and the recA730 mutation seem to induce different SOS mutator activities, both generating untargeted mutations.