Regulation of the Escherichia coli uvrD gene in vivo

Interaction of RecA mediated SOS response with bacterial persistence, biofilm formation, and host response

Antibiotics have a primary mode of actions, and most of them have a common secondary mode of action via reactive species (ROS and RNS) mediated DNA damage. Bacteria have been able to tolerate this DNA damage by SOS (Save-Our-Soul) response. RecA is the universal essential key protein of the DNA damage mediated SOS repair in various bacteria including ESKAPE pathogens. In addition, antibiotics also triggers activation of various other bacterial mechanisms such as biofilm formation, host dependent responses, persister subpopulation formation. These supporting the survival of bacteria in unfriendly natural conditions i.e. antibiotic presence. This review highlights the detailed mechanism of RecA mediated SOS response as well as role of RecA-LexA interaction in SOS response. The review also focuses on inter-connection between DNA damage repair pathway (like SOS response) with other survival mechanisms of bacteria such as host mediated RecA induction, persister-SOS interplay, and biofilm-SOS interplay. This understanding of inter-connection of SOS response with different other survival mechanisms will prove beneficial in targeting the SOS response for prevention and development of therapeutics against recalcitrant bacterial infections. The review also covers the significance of RecA as a promising potent therapeutic target for hindering bacterial SOS response in prevailing successful treatments of bacterial infections and enhancing the conventional antibiotic efficiency.

Effects of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Mutant Strain Hsp16.3 Gene on Murine RAW 264.7 Macrophage Autophagy

Heat shock protein Hsp16.3 is closely related to latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) infection and plays an important role in sustained survival when MTB is dormant. In this study, the Hsp16.3 gene mutant MTB H37Rv strain (Hsp16.3ΔMTB) was obtained through gene recombination and infected into murine RAW 264.7 macrophages. Western blotting and immunofluorescence showed increased expression of the autophagy-related protein LC3, and transmission electron microscopy showed significantly increased macrophage autophagosomes, suggesting that Hsp16.3ΔMTB facilitates murine macrophage autophagy. These findings have implications for preventing and controlling tuberculosis.

Promoters of Escherichia coli versus promoter islands: function and structure comparison

Expression of bacterial genes takes place under the control of RNA polymerase with exchangeable σ-subunits and multiple transcription factors. A typical promoter region contains one or several overlapping promoters. In the latter case promoters have the same or different σ-specificity and are often subjected to different regulatory stimuli. Genes, transcribed from multiple promoters, have on average higher expression levels. However, recently in the genome of Escherichia coli we found 78 regions with an extremely large number of potential transcription start points (promoter islands, PIs). It was shown that all PIs interact with RNA polymerase in vivo and are able to form transcriptionally competent open complexes both in vitro and in vivo but their transcriptional activity measured by oligonucleotide microarrays was very low, if any. Here we confirmed transcriptional defectiveness of PIs by analyzing the 5'-end specific RNA-seq data, but showed their ability to produce short oligos (9-14 bases). This combination of functional properties indicated a deliberate suppression of transcriptional activity within PIs. According to our data this suppression may be due to a specific conformation of the DNA double helix, which provides an ideal platform for interaction with both RNA polymerase and the histone-like nucleoid protein H-NS. The genomic DNA of E.coli contains therefore several dozen sites optimized by evolution for staying in a heterochromatin-like state. Since almost all promoter islands are associated with horizontally acquired genes, we offer them as specific components of bacterial evolution involved in acquisition of foreign genetic material by turning off the expression of toxic or useless aliens or by providing optimal promoter for beneficial genes. The putative molecular mechanism underlying the appearance of promoter islands within recipient genomes is discussed.

DNA Mismatch Repair

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) corrects replication errors in newly synthesized DNA. It also has an antirecombination action on heteroduplexes that contain similar but not identical sequences. This review focuses on the genetics and development of MMR and not on the latest biochemical mechanisms. The main focus is on MMR in Escherichia coli, but examples from Streptococcuspneumoniae and Bacillussubtilis have also been included. In most organisms, only MutS (detects mismatches) and MutL (an endonuclease) and a single exonucleaseare present. How this system discriminates between newlysynthesized and parental DNA strands is not clear. In E. coli and its relatives, however, Dam methylation is an integral part of MMR and is the basis for strand discrimination. A dedicated site-specific endonuclease, MutH, is present, andMutL has no endonuclease activity; four exonucleases can participate in MMR. Although it might seem that the accumulated wealth of genetic and biochemical data has given us a detailed picture of the mechanism of MMR in E. coli, the existence of three competing models to explain the initiation phase indicates the complexity of the system. The mechanism of the antirecombination action of MMR is largely unknown, but only MutS and MutL appear to be necessary. A primary site of action appears to be on RecA, although subsequent steps of the recombination process can also be inhibited. In this review, the genetics of Very Short Patch (VSP) repair of T/G mismatches arising from deamination of 5-methylcytosineresidues is also discussed.

UvrD helicase of Plasmodium falciparum

Malaria caused by the mosquito-transmitted parasite Plasmodium is the cause of enormous number of deaths every year in the tropical and subtropical areas of the world. Among four species of Plasmodium, Plasmodium falciparum causes most fatal form of malaria. With time, the parasite has developed insecticide and drug resistance. Newer strategies and advent of novel drug targets are required so as to combat the deadly form of malaria. Helicases is one such class of enzymes which has previously been suggested as potential antiviral and anticancer targets. These enzymes play an essential role in nearly all the nucleic acid metabolic processes, catalyzing the transient opening of the duplex nucleic acids in an NTP-dependent manner. DNA helicases from the PcrA/UvrD/Rep subfamily are important for the survival of the various organisms. Members from this subfamily can be targeted and inhibited by a variety of synthetic compounds. UvrD from this subfamily is the only member present in the P. falciparum genome, which shows no homology with UvrD from human and thus can be considered as a strong potential drug target. In this manuscript we provide an overview of UvrD family of helicases and bioinformatics analysis of UvrD from P. falciparum.

The SOS-dependent upregulation of uvrD is not required for efficient nucleotide excision repair of ultraviolet light induced DNA photoproducts in Escherichia coli

We have shown previously that induction of the SOS response is required for efficient nucleotide excision repair (NER) of the major ultraviolet light (UV) induced DNA lesion, the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD), but not for repair of 6-4 photoproducts (6-4PP) or for transcription-coupled repair of CPDs [1]. We have proposed that the upregulation of cellular NER capacity occurs in the early stages of the SOS response and enhances the rate of repair of the abundant yet poorly recognized genomic CPDs. The expression of three NER genes, uvrA, uvrB, and uvrD, is upregulated as part of the SOS response. UvrD differs from the others in that it is not involved in lesion recognition but rather in promoting the post-incision steps of NER, including turnover of the UvrBC incision complex. Since uvrC is not induced during the SOS response, its turnover would seem to be of great importance in promoting efficient NER. Here we show that the constitutive level of UvrD is adequate for carrying out efficient NER of both CPDs and 6-4PPs. Thus, the upregulation of uvrA and uvrB genes during the SOS response is sufficient for inducible NER of CPDs. We also show that cells with a limited NER capacity, in this case due to deletion of the uvrD gene, repair 6-4PPs but cannot perform transcription-coupled repair of CPDs, indicating that the 6-4PP is a better substrate for NER than is a CPD targeted for transcription-coupled repair.

The sequence of the Haemophilus influenzae mutB gene indicates it encodes a DNA helicase II-like protein

A 6.2-kb Haemophilus influenzae genomic DNA fragment which partially complemented both the mutator and ultraviolet light sensitive (UVs) phenotypes of the H. influenzae mutB1 mutant was isolated. This fragment was also able to complement the UVs phenotype of Escherichia coli uvrD mutant hosts. The uvrD+ gene complemented the mutator phenotype of mutB1 hosts. The nucleotide (nt) sequence of the 6.2-kb fragment revealed an open reading frame (ORF) of 2184 bp. This ORF shows similarity at both the nt and amino acid (aa) levels with the uvrD gene of E. coli. Comparison of the sequences revealed eight regions of aa conservation in addition to seven previously identified helicase superfamily domains. The nt sequence 5' to the mutB ORF contains several potential regulatory motifs, including a LexA-binding site. Based upon these observations, we are confident that the mutB gene of H. influenzae encodes an ATP-dependent DNA helicase-like activity.

Cloning and characterization of the Haemophilus influenzae mutB gene

The Haemophilus influenzae mutB+ gene complements Escherichia coli uvrD mutants. The E. coli uvrD+ gene complements H. influenzae mutB1 mutants.

Compilation of E. coli mRNA promoter sequences

An updated compilation of 300 E. coli mRNA promoter sequences is presented. For each sequence the most recent relevant paper was checked, to verify the location of the transcriptional start position as identified experimentally. We comment on the reliability of the sequence databanks and analyze the conservation of known promoter features in the current compilation. This database is available by E-mail.