Overproduction of the beta subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme reduces UV mutagenesis in Escherichia coli

Analysis of the stimulation of DNA polymerase V of Escherichia coli by processivity proteins

Bypass of replication-blocking lesions in Escherichia coli is carried out by DNA polymerase V (UmuC) in a reaction that requires UmuD', RecA, and single-strand DNA-binding protein (SSB). The activity of this four-component basic bypass system is a low-fidelity and low-processivity activity. Addition of the processivity subunits of pol III, the beta subunit sliding DNA clamp, and the five-subunit gamma complex clamp loader increased the rate of translesion replication approximately 3-fold. This stimulation was specific to the lesion bypass step, with no effect on the initiation of synthesis by pol V. The beta subunit and gamma complex increased the processivity of pol V from 3 to approximately 14-18 nucleotides, providing a mechanistic basis for their stimulatory effect. Stimulation of bypass was observed over a range of RecA and SSB concentrations. ATPgammaS, which strongly inhibits translesion replication by pol V, primarily via inhibition of the initiation stage, caused the same inhibition also in the presence of the processivity proteins. The in vivo role of the processivity proteins in translesion replication was examined by assaying UV mutagenesis. This was done in a strain carrying the dnaN59 allele, encoding a temperature-sensitive beta subunit. When assayed in an excision repair-defective background, the dnaN59 mutant exhibited a level of UV mutagenesis reduced up to 3-fold compared to that of the isogenic dnaN(+) strain. This suggests that like in the in vitro system, the beta subunit stimulates lesion bypass in vivo.

Managing DNA polymerases: coordinating DNA replication, DNA repair, and DNA recombination

Two important and timely questions with respect to DNA replication, DNA recombination, and DNA repair are: (i) what controls which DNA polymerase gains access to a particular primer-terminus, and (ii) what determines whether a DNA polymerase hands off its DNA substrate to either a different DNA polymerase or to a different protein(s) for the completion of the specific biological process? These questions have taken on added importance in light of the fact that the number of known template-dependent DNA polymerases in both eukaryotes and in prokaryotes has grown tremendously in the past two years. Most notably, the current list now includes a completely new family of enzymes that are capable of replicating imperfect DNA templates. This UmuC-DinB-Rad30-Rev1 superfamily of DNA polymerases has members in all three kingdoms of life. Members of this family have recently received a great deal of attention due to the roles they play in translesion DNA synthesis (TLS), the potentially mutagenic replication over DNA lesions that act as potent blocks to continued replication catalyzed by replicative DNA polymerases. Here, we have attempted to summarize our current understanding of the regulation of action of DNA polymerases with respect to their roles in DNA replication, TLS, DNA repair, DNA recombination, and cell cycle progression. In particular, we discuss these issues in the context of the Gram-negative bacterium, Escherichia coli, that contains a DNA polymerase (Pol V) known to participate in most, if not all, of these processes.

The SOS response: recent insights into umuDC-dependent mutagenesis and DNA damage tolerance

Be they prokaryotic or eukaryotic, organisms are exposed to a multitude of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damaging agents ranging from ultraviolet (UV) light to fungal metabolites, like Aflatoxin B1. Furthermore, DNA damaging agents, such as reactive oxygen species, can be produced by cells themselves as metabolic byproducts and intermediates. Together, these agents pose a constant threat to an organism's genome. As a result, organisms have evolved a number of vitally important mechanisms to repair DNA damage in a high fidelity manner. They have also evolved systems (cell cycle checkpoints) that delay the resumption of the cell cycle after DNA damage to allow more time for these accurate processes to occur. If a cell cannot repair DNA damage accurately, a mutagenic event may occur. Most bacteria, including Escherichia coli, have evolved a coordinated response to these challenges to the integrity of their genomes. In E. coli, this inducible system is termed the SOS response, and it controls both accurate and potentially mutagenic DNA repair functions [reviewed comprehensively in () and also in ()]. Recent advances have focused attention on the umuD(+)C(+)-dependent, translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) process that is responsible for SOS mutagenesis (). Here we discuss the SOS response of E. coli and concentrate in particular on the roles of the umuD(+)C(+) gene products in promoting cell survival after DNA damage via TLS and a primitive DNA damage checkpoint.

The two-step model for translesion synthesis: then and now

The formation of base substitution mutations following exposure of bacteria to ultraviolet light and many other mutagens occurs during translesion synthesis opposite a photoproduct or other lesion in the template strand of DNA. This process requires the UmuD(2)' UmuC complex, only formed to a significant extent in SOS-induced cells. The "two-step" model proposed that there were two steps, insertion of a wrong base (misincorporation) and use of the misincorporated base as a primer for further chain extension (bypass). The original evidence suggested that UmuD(2)' UmuC was needed only for the second step and that in its absence other polymerases such as DNA polymerase III could make misincorporations. Now we know that the UmuD(2)' UmuC complex is DNA polymerase V and that it can carry out both steps in vitro and probably does both in vivo in wild-type cells. Even so, DNA polymerase III clearly has an important accessory role in vitro and a possibly essential role in vivo, the precise nature of which is not clear. DNA polymerases II and IV are also up-regulated in SOS-induced cells and their involvement in the broader picture of translesion synthesis is only now beginning to emerge. It is suggested that we need to think of the chromosomal replication factory as a structure through which the DNA passes and within which as many as five DNA polymerases may need to act. Protein-protein interactions may result in a cassette system in which the most appropriate polymerase can be engaged with the DNA at any given time. The original two-step model was very specific, and thus an oversimplification. As a general concept, however, it reflects reality and has been demonstrated in experiments with eukaryotic DNA polymerases in vitro.

DNA polymerases and SOS mutagenesis: can one reconcile the biochemical and genetic data?

Until recently, it had been concluded from genetic evidence that DNA polymerase III (Pol III, the main replicative polymerase in E. coli) was also responsible for mutagenic translesion synthesis on damaged templates, albeit under the influence of inducible proteins UmuD' and UmuC. Now it appears that these proteins themselves have polymerase activity (and are now known as Pol V) and can carry out translesion synthesis in vitro in the absence of Pol III. Here I discuss the apparent contradictions between genetics and biochemistry with regard to the role of Pol III in translesion synthesis. Does Pol V interact with Pol III and constitute an alternative component of the replication factory (replisome)? Where do the other three known polymerases fit in? What devices does the cell have to ensure that the "right" polymerase is used in a given situation? The debate about the role of Pol III in translesion synthesis reveals a deeper divide between models that interpret everything in terms of mass action effects and those that embrace a replisome held together by protein-protein interactions and located as a structural entity within the cell.

Recombinational repair of DNA damage in Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda

Although homologous recombination and DNA repair phenomena in bacteria were initially extensively studied without regard to any relationship between the two, it is now appreciated that DNA repair and homologous recombination are related through DNA replication. In Escherichia coli, two-strand DNA damage, generated mostly during replication on a template DNA containing one-strand damage, is repaired by recombination with a homologous intact duplex, usually the sister chromosome. The two major types of two-strand DNA lesions are channeled into two distinct pathways of recombinational repair: daughter-strand gaps are closed by the RecF pathway, while disintegrated replication forks are reestablished by the RecBCD pathway. The phage lambda recombination system is simpler in that its major reaction is to link two double-stranded DNA ends by using overlapping homologous sequences. The remarkable progress in understanding the mechanisms of recombinational repair in E. coli over the last decade is due to the in vitro characterization of the activities of individual recombination proteins. Putting our knowledge about recombinational repair in the broader context of DNA replication will guide future experimentation.

Inhibition of homologous recombination by the plasmid MucA'B complex

By its functional interaction with a RecA polymer, the mutagenic UmuD'C complex possesses an antirecombination activity. We show here that MucA'B, a functional homolog of the UmuD'C complex, inhibits homologous recombination as well. In F- recipients expressing MucA'B from a Ptac promoter, Hfr x F- recombination decreased with increasing MucA'B concentrations down to 50-fold. In damage-induced pKM101-containing cells expressing MucA'B from the native promoter, recombination between a UV-damaged F lac plasmid and homologous chromosomal DNA decreased 10-fold. Overexpression of MucA'B together with UmuD'C resulted in a synergistic inhibition of recombination. RecA[UmuR] proteins, which are resistant to UmuD'C inhibition of recombination, are inhibited by MucA'B while promoting MucA'B-promoted mutagenesis efficiently. The data suggest that MucA'B and UmuD'C contact a RecA polymer at distinct sites. The MucA'B complex was more active than UmuD'C in promoting UV mutagenesis, yet it did not inhibit recombination more than UmuD'C does. The enhanced mutagenic potential of MucA'B may result from its inherent superior capacity to assist DNA polymerase in trans-lesion synthesis. In the course of this work, we found that the natural plasmid pKM101 expresses around 45,000 MucA and 13,000 MucB molecules per lexA(Def) cell devoid of LexA. These molecular Muc concentrations are far above those of the chromosomally encoded Umu counterparts. Plasmid pKM101 belongs to a family of broad-host-range conjugative plasmids. The elevated levels of the Muc proteins might be required for successful installation of pKM101-like plasmids into a variety of host cells.

Efficient translesion replication in the absence of Escherichia coli Umu proteins and 3'-5' exonuclease proofreading function

Translesion replication (TR) past a cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer in Escherichia coli normally requires the UmuD'2C complex, RecA protein, and DNA polymerase III holoenzyme (pol III). However, we find that efficient TR can occur in the absence of the Umu proteins if the 3'-5' exonuclease proofreading activity of the pol III epsilon-subunit also is disabled. TR was measured in isogenic uvrA6 DeltaumuDC strains carrying the dominant negative dnaQ allele, mutD5, or DeltadnaQ spq-2 mutations by transfecting them with single-stranded M13-based vectors containing a specifically located cis-syn T-T dimer. As expected, little TR was observed in the DeltaumuDC dnaQ+ strain. Surprisingly, 26% TR occurred in UV-irradiated DeltaumuDC mutD5 cells, one-half the frequency found in a uvrA6 umuDC+mutD5 strain. lexA3 (Ind-) derivatives of the strains showed that this TR was contingent on two inducible functions, one LexA-dependent, responsible for approximately 70% of the TR, and another LexA-independent, responsible for the remaining approximately 30%. Curiously, the DeltaumuDC DeltadnaQ spq-2 strain exhibited only the LexA-independent level of TR. The cause of this result appears to be the spq-2 allele, a dnaE mutation required for viability in DeltadnaQ strains, since introduction of spq-2 into the DeltaumuDC mutD5 strain also reduces the frequency of TR to the LexA-independent level. The molecular mechanism responsible for the LexA-independent TR is unknown but may be related to the UVM phenomenon [Palejwala, V. A., Wang, G. E., Murphy, H. S. & Humayun, M. Z. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 6041-6048]. LexA-dependent TR does not result from the induction of pol II, since TR in the DeltaumuDC mutD5 strain is unchanged by introduction of a DeltapolB mutation.

The beta subunit sliding DNA clamp is responsible for unassisted mutagenic translesion replication by DNA polymerase III holoenzyme

The replication of damaged nucleotides that have escaped DNA repair leads to the formation of mutations caused by misincorporation opposite the lesion. In Escherichia coli, this process is under tight regulation of the SOS stress response and is carried out by DNA polymerase III in a process that involves also the RecA, UmuD' and UmuC proteins. We have shown that DNA polymerase III holoenzyme is able to replicate, unassisted, through a synthetic abasic site in a gapped duplex plasmid. Here, we show that DNA polymerase III*, a subassembly of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme lacking the beta subunit, is blocked very effectively by the synthetic abasic site in the same DNA substrate. Addition of the beta subunit caused a dramatic increase of at least 28-fold in the ability of the polymerase to perform translesion replication, reaching 52% bypass in 5 min. When the ssDNA region in the gapped plasmid was extended from 22 nucleotides to 350 nucleotides, translesion replication still depended on the beta subunit, but it was reduced by 80%. DNA sequence analysis of translesion replication products revealed mostly -1 frameshifts. This mutation type is changed to base substitution by the addition of UmuD', UmuC, and RecA, as demonstrated in a reconstituted SOS translesion replication reaction. These results indicate that the beta subunit sliding DNA clamp is the major determinant in the ability of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme to perform unassisted translesion replication and that this unassisted bypass produces primarily frameshifts.

Mutagenesis and more: umuDC and the Escherichia coli SOS response

The cellular response to DNA damage that has been most extensively studied is the SOS response of Escherichia coli. Analyses of the SOS response have led to new insights into the transcriptional and post-translational regulation of processes that increase cell survival after DNA damage as well as insights into DNA-damage-induced mutagenesis, i.e., SOS mutagenesis. SOS mutagenesis requires the recA and umuDC gene products and has as its mechanistic basis the alteration of DNA polymerase III such that it becomes capable of replicating DNA containing miscoding and noncoding lesions. Ongoing investigations of the mechanisms underlying SOS mutagenesis, as well as recent observations suggesting that the umuDC operon may have a role in the regulation of the E. coli cell cycle after DNA damage has occurred, are discussed.

Anti-mutagenic activity of DNA damage-binding proteins mediated by direct inhibition of translesion replication

DNA lesions that block replication can be bypassed in Escherichia coli by a special DNA synthesis process termed translesion replication. This process is mutagenic due to the miscoding nature of the DNA lesions. We report that the repair enzyme formamido-pyrimidine DNA glycosylase and the general DNA damage recognition protein UvrA each inhibit specifically translesion replication through an abasic site analog by purified DNA polymerases I and II, and DNA polymerase III (alpha subunit) from E. coli. In vivo experiments suggest that a similar inhibitory mechanism prevents at least 70% of the mutations caused by ultraviolet light DNA lesions in E. coli. These results suggest that DNA damage-binding proteins regulate mutagenesis by a novel mechanism that involves direct inhibition of translesion replication. This mechanism provides anti-mutagenic defense against DNA lesions that have escaped DNA repair.

A small, stable RNA induced by oxidative stress: role as a pleiotropic regulator and antimutator

Exposure of E. coli to hydrogen peroxide induces the transcription of a small RNA denoted oxyS. The oxyS RNA is stable, abundant, and does not encode a protein. oxyS activates and represses the expression of numerous genes in E. coli, and eight targets, including genes encoding the transcriptional regulators FhlA and sigma(S), were identified. oxyS expression also leads to a reduction in spontaneous and chemically-induced mutagenesis. Our results suggest that the oxyS RNA acts as a regulator that integrates adaptation to hydrogen peroxide with other cellular stress responses and helps to protect cells against oxidative damage.

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen promotes DNA synthesis past template lesions by mammalian DNA polymerase delta

Consistent with previous observations, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) promotes DNA synthesis by calf thymus DNA polymerase delta (pol delta) past several chemically defined template lesions including model abasic sites, 8-oxo-deoxyguanosine (dG) and aminofluorene-dG (but not acetylaminofluorene-dG). This synthesis is potentially mutagenic. The model abasic site was studied most extensively. When all deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates and a template bearing a model abasic site were present, DNA synthesis by pol delta beyond this site was stimulated 53-fold by addition of homologous PCNA. On an unmodified template (lacking any lesions), PCNA stimulated pol delta by 1.3-fold. Product analysis demonstrated that as expected from the "A-rule," fully and near-fully extended primers incorporated predominantly dAMP opposite the template lesion. Moreover, corollary primer extension studies demonstrated that in the presence (but not the absence) of PCNA, pol delta preferentially elongated primers containing dAMP opposite the model abasic template site. p21, a specific inhibitor of PCNA-dependent DNA replication, inhibits PCNA-stimulated synthesis past model abasic template sites. We propose that DNA synthesis past template lesions by pol delta promoted by PCNA results from the fundamental mechanism by which PCNA stimulates pol delta, i.e., stabilization of the pol delta. template-primer complex.

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen promotes misincorporation catalyzed by calf thymus DNA polymerase delta

A proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-dependent complex, detectable after nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, is formed between calf thymus DNA polymerase delta (pol delta) and synthetic oligonucleotide template-primers containing a mispaired nucleotide at the 3'-terminal position of the primer. This complex is indistinguishable in composition from that formed with a fully base paired template-primer. Extension of a mispaired primer terminus is a component of DNA polymerase fidelity. The fidelity of pol delta on synthetic oligonucleotide template-primers was compared with and without its specific processivity factor, PCNA. In the absence of PCNA, pol delta misincorporates less than one nucleotide for every 100,000 nucleotides incorporated correctly. Addition of PCNA to reactions reduces fidelity by at least 27-fold. PCNA also confers upon pol delta, the ability to incorporate (and/or not excise) the dTTP analog, 2'-deoxythymidine-5'-O-(alpha-phosphonomethyl)-beta, gamma-diphosphate. A model is proposed whereby the increased stability (decreased off-rate) of the pol delta.template-primer complex in the presence of PCNA facilitates unfavorable events catalyzed by pol delta. This model suggests an explicit mechanistic requirement for the intrinsic 3'-5'-exonuclease of pol delta.

Analysis of the region between amino acids 30 and 42 of intact UmuD by a monocysteine approach

On the basis of characterizations of a set of UmuD monocysteine derivatives, we had suggested that positions 24, 34, and 44 are closer to the intact UmuD homodimer interface than other positions tested (M. H. Lee, T. Ohta, and G. C. Walker, J. Bacteriol. 176:4825-4837, 1994). Because this region of UmuD also appeared to be important for interactions with RecA, we followed up on our previous study by constructing a second set of monocysteine UmuD derivatives with single cysteine substitutions at positions 30 to 42. We found that like the VC34 mutant, UmuD derivatives with monocysteine substitutions at positions 32 and 35 showed deficiencies in in vivo and in vitro RecA-mediated cleavage as well as in UV mutagenesis, suggesting that the position 32 to 35 region may be important for RecA-mediated cleavage of UmuD. Interestingly, UmuD with monocysteine substitutions at residues 33 and 40 showed a reduction in UV mutagenesis while retaining the ability to be cleaved by RecA in vivo, suggesting a deficiency in the subsequent role of the UmuD' derivatives in mutagenesis. All of the UmuD monocysteine derivatives in the position 30 to 42 series purified indistinguishably from the wild-type protein. The observations that purified proteins of the UmuD derivatives RC37 and IC38 could be disulfide cross-linked quantitatively upon addition of iodine and yet were poorly modified with iodoacetate led us to suggest that the pairs of residues at positions 37 and 38 are extremely close to the UmuD2 homodimer interface. These observations indicate that the structure of the UmuD2 homodimer in solution is very different from the crystal structure of the UmuD'2 homodimer reported by Peat et al. (T. S. Peat, E. G. Frank, J. P. McDonald, A. S. Levine, R. Woodgate, and W. A. Hendrickson, Nature [London] 380:727-730, 1996).

Analysis of the mutagenic properties of the UmuDC, MucAB and RumAB proteins, using a site-specific abasic lesion

The mucAB and rumAB loci have been shown to promote mutagenesis to a greater extent than the structurally and functionally homologous Escherichia coli umuDC operon. We have analyzed the basis of this enhanced mutagenesis by comparing the influence of these operons, relative to umuDC, on the mutagenic properties of each of two abasic sites, specifically located in a single-stranded vector. Experiments with these vectors are useful analytical tools because they provide independent estimates of the efficiency of translesion synthesis and of the relative frequencies of each type of nucleotide insertion or other kind of mutagenic event. The umuDC, mucAB, and rumAB genes were expressed from their natural LexA-regulated promoter on low-copy-number plasmids in isogenic strains carrying a umuDC deletion. In addition, plasmids expressing the UmuD'C, MucA'B, or RumA'B proteins were also used. Compared to umuDC, the chief effect of mucAB was to increase the efficiency of translesion synthesis past the abasic site. The enhanced capacity of mucAB for translesion synthesis depended about equally on an inherently greater capacity to promote this process and on a greater susceptibility of the MucA protein to proteolytic processing. The RumA protein also appeared to be more susceptible to proteolytic processing, but the inherent capacity of the Rum products for translesion synthesis was no greater than that of UmuDC. dAMP was inserted opposite one of the two abasic sites studied at a somewhat greater frequency in strains expressing rum (82%) compared to those expressing umu (72%), which might result in higher mutation frequencies in rumAB than in umuDC strains.

Substitution of mucAB or rumAB for umuDC alters the relative frequencies of the two classes of mutations induced by a site-specific T-T cyclobutane dimer and the efficiency of translesion DNA synthesis

We have examined the effect of replacing umuDC with mucAB or rumAB on the mutagenic properties of a T-T cyclobutane dimer in an attempt to determine the molecular basis for the differences in UV-induced mutagenesis that are associated with these structurally and functionally related genes. A single-stranded vector carrying a site-specific T-T cis-syn cyclobutane dimer was transfected into a set of isogenic Escherichia coli delta umuDC strains harboring low-copy-number plasmids expressing UmuDC, MucAB, RumAB, or their genetically engineered and mutagenically active counterparts UmuD'C, MucA'B, and RumA'B, respectively. Although the overall mutation frequency was similar for all strains, the relative frequencies of the two classes of mutation induced by the T-T dimer varied according to the mutagenesis operon expressed. In umuDC strains, 3' T-->A mutations outnumbered 3' T-->C mutations, but the reverse was true for the mucAB and rumAB strains. We also found that the T-T dimer was bypassed with differing efficiencies in unirradiated cells expressing wild-type UmuDC, MucAB, and RumAB proteins. These differences can probably be attributed to the relative efficiency of the normal cellular posttranslational activation of UmuD, MucA, and RumA, respectively, since recombinant constructs expressing the mutagenically active UmuD'C, MucA'B, and RumA'B proteins all promoted similarly high levels of bypass in UV-irradiated cells. These results suggest that the UmuD'/UmuC complex and its homologs may differ in their relative abilities to promote elongation from T - T and T - G mismatched termini. Alternatively, they may differentially influence the efficiency with which these mismatches are edited or influence nucleotide insertion by the catalytic subunit of the DNA polymerase III.

Beta*, a UV-inducible shorter form of the beta subunit of DNA polymerase III of Escherichia coli. II. Overproduction, purification, and activity as a polymerase processivity clamp

Control elements located inside the coding sequence of dnaN, the gene encoding the beta subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, direct the synthesis of a shorter and UV-inducible form of the beta subunit (Skaliter, R., Paz-Elizur, T., and Livneh, Z. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2278-2281, and Paz-Elizur, T., Skaliter, R., Blumenstein, S., and Livneh, Z. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2282-2290). The protein, termed beta*, was overproduced using the phage T7 expression system, leading to its accumulation as inclusion bodies at 5-10% of the total cellular proteins. beta* was purified in denatured form, followed by refolding to yield a preparation > 95% pure. Denatured beta* had a molecular mass of 26 kDa and contained two isoforms when analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. The major isoform had a pI of 5.45, and comigrated with cellular beta*. Size exclusion high performance liquid chromatography under nondenaturing conditions and chemical cross-linking experiments indicate that beta* is a homotrimer. DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase III* was stimulated up to 10-fold by beta*, primarily due to an increase in the processivity of polymerization. It is suggested that beta* functions as an alternative sliding DNA clamp in a process associated with DNA synthesis in UV-irradiated cells.

Deamination of cytosine-containing pyrimidine photodimers in UV-irradiated DNA. Significance for UV light mutagenesis

The realization that cytosine in cyclobutyl pyrimidine dimers rapidly deaminates to uracil raised the possibility that this chemical transformation, rather than an enzymatic polymerase error, is the major mutagenic step in UV mutagenesis. We have established a sensitive bioassay system that enabled us to determine the rate of deamination of cytosine in cyclobutyl pyrimidine dimers in plasmid DNA. This was done by in vitro UV irradiation and deamination of a plasmid carrying the cro gene, followed by photoreactivation, and assaying uracils in DNA by their ability to cause Cro- mutations in an indicator strain that was deficient in uracil DNA N-glycosylase. DNA sequence analysis revealed that 27 out of 29 Cro- mutants carried GC --> AT transitions, as expected from deamination of cytosine. Deamination of cytosines in the cro gene in UV-irradiated plasmid pOC2 proceeded at 37 degrees C with first-order kinetics, at a rate of (3.9 +/- 0.6) x 10(-5) s-1, corresponding to a half-life of 5 h. Physiological salt conditions increased the half-life to 12 h, whereas decreasing the pH increased deamination. The temperature dependence of the rate constant yielded an activation energy of 13.6 +/- 3.3 kcal/mol. These kinetics data suggest that deamination of cytosine-containing dimers is too slow to play an important role in UV mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. However, it is likely to play an important role in mammalian cells, where the mutagenic process is slower.

A monocysteine approach for probing the structure and interactions of the UmuD protein

UmuD participates in a variety of protein-protein interactions that appear to be essential for its role in UV mutagenesis. To learn about these interactions, we have initiated an approach based on the construction of a series of monocysteine derivatives of UmuD and have carried out experiments exploring the chemistry of the unique thiol group in each derivative. In vivo and in vitro characterizations indicate that these proteins have an essentially native structure. In proposing a model for the interactions of UmuD in the homodimer, we have made the following assumptions: (i) the conformations of the mutant proteins are similar to that of the wild type, and (ii) the differences in reactivity of the mutant proteins are predominantly due to the positional effects of the single cysteine substitutions. The model proposes the following. The region including the Cys-24-Gly-25 cleavage site, Val-34, and Leu-44 are closer to the interface than the other positions tested as suggested by the relative ease of dimer cross-linking of the monocysteine derivatives at these positions by oxidation with iodine (I2) and by reaction with bis-maleimidohexane. The mutant with a Ser-to-Cys change at position 60 (SC60) is similar in iodoacetate reactivity to the preceding derivatives but cross-links less efficiently by I2 oxidation. This suggests that Ser-60, the site of the putative nucleophile in the cleavage reaction, is located further from the dimer interface or in a cleft region. Both Ser-19, located in the N-terminal fragment of UmuD that is removed by RecA-mediated cleavage, and Ser-67 are probably not as close to the dimer interface, since they are cross-linked more easily with bis-maleimidohexane than with I2. The SC67 mutant phenotype also suggests that this position is less important in RecA-mediated cleavage but more important in a subsequent role for UmuD in mutagenesis. Ala-89, Gln-100, and Asp-126 are probably not particularly solvent accessible and may play important roles in protein architecture.

Isolation and characterization of novel plasmid-encoded umuC mutants

Most inducible mutagenesis in Escherichia coli is dependent upon the activity of the UmuDC proteins. The role of UmuC in this process is poorly understood, possibly because of the limited number of genetically characterized umuC mutants. To better understand the function of the UmuC protein in mutagenic DNA repair, we have isolated several novel plasmid-encoded umuC mutants. A multicopy plasmid that expressed UmuC at physiological levels was constructed and randomly mutagenized in vitro by exposure to hydroxylamine. Mutated plasmids were introduced into the umu tester strain RW126, and 16 plasmids that were unable to promote umuC-dependent spontaneous mutator activity were identified by a colorimetric papillation assay. Interestingly, these plasmid mutants fell into two classes: (i) 5 were expression mutants that produced either too little or too much wild-type UmuC protein, and (ii) 11 were plasmids with structural changes in the UmuC protein. Although hydroxylamine mutagenesis was random, most of the structural mutants identified in the screen were localized to two regions of the UmuC protein; four mutations were found in a stretch of 30 amino acids (residues 133 to 162) in the middle of the protein, while four other mutations (three of which resulted in a truncated UmuC protein) were localized in the last 50 carboxyl-terminal amino acid residues. These new plasmid umuC mutants, together with the previously identified chromosomal umuC25, umuC36, and umuC104 mutations that we have also cloned, should prove extremely useful in dissecting the genetic and biochemical activities of UmuC in mutagenic DNA repair.

Beta subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme is induced upon ultraviolet irradiation or nalidixic acid treatment of Escherichia coli

Exposure of Escherichia coli to UV irradiation or nalidixic acid, which induce both the SOS and heat shock responses, led to a 3-4-fold increase in the amount of the beta subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, as assayed by Western blot analysis using anti-beta antibodies. Such an induction was observed also in a delta rpoH mutant lacking the heat shock-specific sigma 32 subunit of RNA polymerase, but it was not observed in recA13 or lexA3 mutants, in which the SOS response cannot be induced. Mapping of transcription initiation sites of the dnaN gene, encoding the beta subunit, using the S1 nuclease protection assay showed essentially no induction of transcription upon UV irradiation, indicating that induction is regulated primarily at the post-transcriptional level. Analysis of translational gene fusions of the dnaN gene, encoding the beta subunit, to the lacZ reporter gene showed induction of beta-galactosidase activity upon UV irradiation of cells harboring the fusion plasmids. Elimination of a 5' flanking DNA sequence in which the dnaN promoters P1 and P2 were located, did not affect the UV inducibility of the gene fusions. Thus, element(s) present from P3 downstream were sufficient for the UV induction. The induction of the dnaN-lacZ gene fusions was dependent on the recA and lexA gene products, but not on the rpoH gene product, in agreement with the immunoblot analysis. The dependence of dnaN induction on the SOS regulators was not mediated via classical repression by the LexA repressor, since the dnaN promoter does not contain a sequence homologous to the LexA binding site, and dnaN mRNA was not inducible by UV light. This suggests that SOS control may be imposed indirectly, by a post-transcriptional mechanism. The increased amount of the beta subunit is needed, most likely, for increased replication and repair activities in cells which have been exposed to UV radiation.

SOS mutagenesis

In Escherichia coli, UV and many chemicals appear to cause mutagenesis by a process of translesion synthesis that requires some form of DNA polymerase III and the SOS-regulated proteins UmuD, UmuC and RecA. An analysis of SOS mutagenesis offers insights into the molecular basis of induced mutagenesis and into mechanisms of DNA damage tolerance.

Replication of damaged DNA and the molecular mechanism of ultraviolet light mutagenesis

On UV irradiation of Escherichia coli cells, DNA replication is transiently arrested to allow removal of DNA damage by DNA repair mechanisms. This is followed by a resumption of DNA replication, a major recovery function whose mechanism is poorly understood. During the post-UV irradiation period the SOS stress response is induced, giving rise to a multiplicity of phenomena, including UV mutagenesis. The prevailing model is that UV mutagenesis occurs by the filling in of single-stranded DNA gaps present opposite UV lesions in the irradiated chromosome. These gaps can be formed by the activity of DNA replication or repair on the damaged DNA. The gap filling involves polymerization through UV lesions (also termed bypass synthesis or error-prone repair) by DNA polymerase III. The primary source of mutations is the incorporation of incorrect nucleotides opposite lesions. UV mutagenesis is a genetically regulated process, and it requires the SOS-inducible proteins RecA, UmuD, and UmuC. It may represent a minor repair pathway or a genetic program to accelerate evolution of cells under environmental stress conditions.

Levels of epsilon, an essential replication subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III, are controlled by heat shock proteins

In Escherichia coli, epsilon, the proofreading subunit of DNA polymerase III, is encoded by dnaQ. A random search for mutants that affect the expression of dnaQ revealed that mutations in the genes encoding the heat shock proteins (HSPs) DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE result in dramatic decreases in the cellular levels of epsilon. dnaQ is arranged in an overlapping divergent transcriptional unit with rnhA, which encodes RNase H1, and mutations in the same HSPs also reduced the apparent levels of RNase H1. The HSPs had only small effects on transcriptional fusions to these genes; thus, it is likely that they operate primarily at the protein level. Since survival and mutagenesis after DNA damage are affected by epsilon and RNase H1, HSPs may have a broad influence on various aspects of DNA replication and repair.