DNA binding and bending are necessary but not sufficient for Fis-dependent activation of rrnB P1

The DNA relaxation-dependent OFF-to-ON biasing of the type 1 fimbrial genetic switch requires the Fis nucleoid-associated protein

The structural genes expressing type 1 fimbriae in Escherichia coli alternate between expressed (phase ON) and non-expressed (phase OFF) states due to inversion of the 314 bp fimS genetic switch. The FimB tyrosine integrase inverts fimS by site-specific recombination, alternately connecting and disconnecting the fim operon, encoding the fimbrial subunit protein and its associated secretion and adhesin factors, to and from its transcriptional promoter within fimS. Site-specific recombination by the FimB recombinase becomes biased towards phase ON as DNA supercoiling is relaxed, a condition that occurs when bacteria approach the stationary phase of the growth cycle. This effect can be mimicked in exponential phase cultures by inhibiting the negative DNA supercoiling activity of DNA gyrase. We report that this bias towards phase ON depends on the presence of the Fis nucleoid-associated protein. We mapped the Fis binding to a site within the invertible fimS switch by DNase I footprinting. Disruption of this binding site by base substitution mutagenesis abolishes both Fis binding and the ability of the mutated switch to sustain its phase ON bias when DNA is relaxed, even in bacteria that produce the Fis protein. In addition, the Fis binding site overlaps one of the sites used by the Lrp protein, a known directionality determinant of fimS inversion that also contributes to phase ON bias. The Fis–Lrp relationship at fimS is reminiscent of that between Fis and Xis when promoting DNA relaxation-dependent excision of bacteriophage λ from the E. coli chromosome. However, unlike the co-binding mechanism used by Fis and Xis at λ attR, the Fis–Lrp relationship at fimS involves competitive binding. We discuss these findings in the context of the link between fimS inversion biasing and the physiological state of the bacterium.

Open complex scrunching before nucleotide addition accounts for the unusual transcription start site of E. coli ribosomal RNA promoters

Most Escherichia coli promoters initiate transcription with a purine 7 or 8 nt downstream from the -10 hexamer, but some promoters, including the ribosomal RNA promoter rrnB P1, start 9 nt from the -10 element. We identified promoter and RNA polymerase determinants of this noncanonical rrnB P1 start site using biochemical and genetic approaches including mutational analysis of the promoter, Fe(2+) cleavage assays to monitor template strand positions near the active-site, and Bpa cross-linking to map the path of open complex DNA at amino acid and nucleotide resolution. We find that mutations in several promoter regions affect transcription start site (TSS) selection. In particular, we show that the absence of strong interactions between the discriminator region and σ region 1.2 and between the extended -10 element and σ region 3.0, identified previously as a determinant of proper regulation of rRNA promoters, is also required for the unusual TSS. We find that the DNA in the single-stranded transcription bubble of the rrnB P1 promoter complex expands and is "scrunched" into the active site channel of RNA polymerase, similar to the situation in initial transcribing complexes. However, in the rrnB P1 open complex, scrunching occurs before RNA synthesis begins. We find that the scrunched open complex exhibits reduced abortive product synthesis, suggesting that scrunching and unusual TSS selection contribute to the extraordinary transcriptional activity of rRNA promoters by increasing promoter escape, helping to offset the reduction in promoter activity that would result from the weak interactions with σ.

Strength and Regulation of Seven rRNA Promoters in Escherichia coli

The model prokaryote Escherichia coli contains seven copies of the rRNA operon in the genome. The presence of multiple rRNA operons is an advantage for increasing the level of ribosome, the key apparatus of translation, in response to environmental conditions. The complete sequence of E. coli genome, however, indicated the micro heterogeneity between seven rRNA operons, raising the possibility in functional heterogeneity and/or differential mode of expression. The aim of this research is to determine the strength and regulation of the promoter of each rRNA operon in E. coli. For this purpose, we used the double-fluorescent protein reporter pBRP system that was developed for accurate and precise determination of the promoter strength of protein-coding genes. For application of this promoter assay vector for measurement of the rRNA operon promoters devoid of the signal for translation, a synthetic SD sequence was added at the initiation codon of the reporter GFP gene, and then approximately 500 bp-sequence upstream each 16S rRNA was inserted in front of this SD sequence. Using this modified pGRS system, the promoter activity of each rrn operon was determined by measuring the rrn promoter-directed GFP and the reference promoter-directed RFP fluorescence, both encoded by a single and the same vector. Results indicated that: the promoter activity was the highest for the rrnE promoter under all growth conditions analyzed, including different growth phases of wild-type E. coli grown in various media; but the promoter strength of other six rrn promoters was various depending on the culture conditions. These findings altogether indicate that seven rRNA operons are different with respect to the regulation mode of expression, conferring an advantage to E. coli through a more fine-tuned control of ribosome formation in a wide range of environmental situations. Possible difference in the functional role of each rRNA operon is also discussed.

RemA is a DNA-binding protein that activates biofilm matrix gene expression in Bacillus subtilis

Biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis requires expression of the eps and tapA-sipW-tasA operons to synthesize the extracellular matrix components, extracellular polysaccharide and TasA amyloid proteins, respectively. Expression of both operons is inhibited by the DNA-binding protein master regulator of biofilm formation SinR and activated by the protein RemA. Here we show that RemA is a DNA-binding protein that binds to multiple sites upstream of the promoters of both operons and is both necessary and sufficient for transcriptional activation in vivo and in vitro. We further show that SinR negatively regulates eps operon expression by occluding RemA binding and thus for the P(eps) promoter SinR functions as an anti-activator. Finally, transcriptional profiling indicated that RemA was primarily a regulator of the extracellular matrix genes, but it also activated genes involved in osmoprotection, leading to the identification of another direct target, the opuA operon.

Growth rate regulation in Escherichia coli

Growth rate regulation in bacteria has been an important issue in bacterial physiology for the past 50 years. This review, using Escherichia coli as a paradigm, summarizes the mechanisms for the regulation of rRNA synthesis in the context of systems biology, particularly, in the context of genome-wide competition for limited RNA polymerase (RNAP) in the cell under different growth conditions including nutrient starvation. The specific location of the seven rrn operons in the chromosome and the unique properties of the rrn promoters contribute to growth rate regulation. The length of the rrn transcripts, coupled with gene dosage effects, influence the distribution of RNAP on the chromosome in response to growth rate. Regulation of rRNA synthesis depends on multiple factors that affect the structure of the nucleoid and the allocation of RNAP for global gene expression. The magic spot ppGpp, which acts with DksA synergistically, is a key effector in both the growth rate regulation and the stringent response induced by nutrient starvation, mainly because the ppGpp level changes in response to environmental cues. It regulates rRNA synthesis via a cascade of events including both transcription initiation and elongation, and can be explained by an RNAP redistribution (allocation) model.

Biochemical identification of base and phosphate contacts between Fis and a high-affinity DNA binding site

Fis (factor for inversion stimulation) is a nucleoid-associated protein in Escherichia coli and other bacteria that stimulates certain site-specific DNA recombination events, alters DNA topology, and serves as a global gene regulator. DNA binding is central to the functions of Fis and involves a helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif located in the carboxy-terminal region. Specific DNA binding is observed at a number of sites exhibiting poorly related sequences. Such interactions require four critical base pairs positioned -7, -3, +3, and +7 nucleotides relative to the central nucleotide of a 15-bp core-binding site. To further understand how Fis interacts with DNA, we identified the positions of 14 DNA phosphates (based on ethylation interference assays) that are required for Fis binding. These are the 5' phosphates of the nucleotides at positions -8, -7, -6, +1, +2, +3, and +4 relative to the central nucleotide on both DNA strands. Another five phosphates located in the flanking regions from positions +10 through +14 can serve as additional contact sites. Using a combination of biochemical approaches and various mutant Fis proteins, we probed possible interactions between several key Fis residues and DNA bases or phosphates within a high-affinity binding site. We provide evidence in support of interactions between the R85 Fis residue and a highly conserved guanine at position -7 and between T87 and the critical base pairs at -3 and +3. In addition, we present evidence in support of interactions between N84 and the phosphate 5' to the base at +4, between R89 and the -7 phosphate, between T87 and the +3 and +4 phosphates, and between K90 and the +3 phosphate. This work provides functional evidence for some of the most critical interactions between Fis and DNA required for a high binding affinity and demonstrates the large contribution made by numerous phosphates to the stability of the Fis-DNA complex.

Functional characterization of the Escherichia coli Fis-DNA binding sequence

The Escherichia coli protein Fis is remarkable for its ability to interact specifically with DNA sites of highly variable sequences. The mechanism of this sequence-flexible DNA recognition is not well understood. In a previous study, we examined the contributions of Fis residues to high-affinity binding at different DNA sequences using alanine-scanning mutagenesis and identified several key residues for Fis-DNA recognition. In this work, we investigated the contributions of the 15-bp core Fis binding sequence and its flanking regions to Fis-DNA interactions. Systematic base-pair replacements made in both half sites of a palindromic Fis binding sequence were examined for their effects on the relative Fis binding affinity. Missing contact assays were also used to examine the effects of base removal within the core binding site and its flanking regions on the Fis-DNA binding affinity. The results revealed that: (1) the -7G and +3Y bases in both DNA strands (relative to the central position of the core binding site) are major determinants for high-affinity binding; (2) the C(5) methyl group of thymine, when present at the +4 position, strongly hinders Fis binding; and (3) AT-rich sequences in the central and flanking DNA regions facilitate Fis-DNA interactions by altering the DNA structure and by increasing the local DNA flexibility. We infer that the degeneracy of specific Fis binding sites results from the numerous base-pair combinations that are possible at noncritical DNA positions (from -6 to -4, from -2 to +2, and from +4 to +6), with only moderate penalties on the binding affinity, the roughly similar contributions of -3A or G and +3T or C to the binding affinity, and the minimal requirement of three of the four critical base pairs to achieve considerably high binding affinities.

The seven E. coli ribosomal RNA operon upstream regulatory regions differ in structure and transcription factor binding efficiencies

Ribosomal RNAs in E. coli are transcribed from seven operons, which are highly conserved in their organization and sequence. However, the upstream regulatory DNA regions differ considerably, suggesting differences in regulation. We have therefore analyzed the conformation of all seven DNA elements located upstream of the major E. coli rRNA P1 promoters. As judged by temperature-dependent gel electrophoresis with isolated DNA fragments comprising the individual P1 promoters and the complete upstream regulatory regions, all seven rRNA upstream sequences are intrinsically curved. The degree of intrinsic curvature was highest for the rrnB and rrnD fragments and less pronounced for the rrnA and rrnE operons. Comparison of the experimentally determined differences in curvature with programs for the prediction of DNA conformation revealed a generally high degree of conformity. Moreover, the analysis showed that the center of curvature is located at about the same position in all fragments. The different upstream regions were analyzed for their capacity to bind the transcription factors FIS and H-NS, which are known as antagonists in the regulation of rRNA synthesis. Gel retardation experiments revealed that both proteins interact with the upstream promoter regions of all seven rDNA fragments, with the affinities of the different DNA fragments for FIS and H-NS and the structure of the resulting complexes deviating considerably. FIS binding was non-cooperative, and at comparable protein concentrations the occupancy of the different DNA fragments varied between two and four binding sites. In contrast, H-NS was shown to bind cooperatively and intermediate states of occupancy could not be resolved for each fragment. The different gel electrophoretic mobilities of the individual DNA/protein complexes indicate variable structures and topologies of the upstream activating sequence regulatory complexes. Our results are highly suggestive of differential regulation of the individual rRNA operons.

Sequence-independent upstream DNA-alphaCTD interactions strongly stimulate Escherichia coli RNA polymerase-lacUV5 promoter association

The C-terminal domains of the two alpha-subunits (alphaCTD) in Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) recognize specific sequences called UP elements in some promoters. These interactions can increase transcription dramatically. Previously, effects of upstream DNA-alphaCTD interactions on transcription were quantified relative to control promoters with nonspecific DNA sequences substituted for UP elements. However, contributions of nonspecific upstream DNA-alphaCTD interactions to promoter activity have not been evaluated extensively. Here, we examine effects of removal of alphaCTD, upstream promoter DNA, or both on the rate of open-complex formation with promoters that lack UP elements. Deletion of alphaCTD decreased the composite second-order association rate constant, k(a), of RNAP for the lacUV5 promoter by approximately 10-fold. Much of this effect was attributable to a decrease in the isomerization rate constant, k(2). Removal of promoter DNA upstream of the -35 element also decreased both k(a) and k(2) approximately 10-fold. Upstream DNA extending approximately to base pair -100 was sufficient for maximal association rates of wild-type RNAP with lacUV5 promoter fragments. The alphaCTD and upstream DNA did not affect dissociation rates from the open complex. We suggest that sequence-independent upstream DNA interactions with alphaCTD are major contributors to initiation at many (or all) promoters (not merely promoters containing UP elements) and that these interactions facilitate isomerization events occurring well downstream of the alpha-binding sites. In addition to highlighting the functional importance of nonspecific protein-DNA interactions, these results suggest also that UP element-alphaCTD interactions play an even larger role in transcription initiation than appreciated previously.

Control of rRNA synthesis in Escherichia coli: a systems biology approach

The first part of this review contains an overview of the various contributions and models relating to the control of rRNA synthesis reported over the last 45 years. The second part describes a systems biology approach to identify the factors and effectors that control the interactions between RNA polymerase and rRNA (rrn) promoters of Escherichia coli bacteria during exponential growth in different media. This analysis is based on measurements of absolute rrn promoter activities as transcripts per minute per promoter in bacterial strains either deficient or proficient in the synthesis of the factor Fis and/or the effector ppGpp. These absolute promoter activities are evaluated in terms of rrn promoter strength (V(max)/K(m)) and free RNA polymerase concentrations. Three major conclusions emerge from this evaluation. First, the rrn promoters are not saturated with RNA polymerase. As a consequence, changes in the concentration of free RNA polymerase contribute to changes in rrn promoter activities. Second, rrn P2 promoter strength is not specifically regulated during exponential growth at different rates; its activity changes only when the concentration of free RNA polymerase changes. Third, the effector ppGpp reduces the strength of the rrn P1 promoter both directly and indirectly by reducing synthesis of the stimulating factor Fis. This control of rrn P1 promoter strength forms part of a larger feedback loop that adjusts the synthesis of ribosomes to the availability of amino acids via amino acid-dependent control of ppGpp accumulation.

Buffering of stable RNA promoter activity against DNA relaxation requires a far upstream sequence

The stable RNA promoters of Escherichia coli are exquisitely sensitive to variations in the superhelical density of DNA. Previously, we have shown that binding of the DNA architectural protein FIS at the upstream activating sequences (UASs) of stable RNA promoters prevents the transcription complexes from inactivation induced by changes in the supercoiling level of DNA. Here, we identify a strong FIS binding site 89 bp upstream of the previously described cluster of FIS binding sites located between positions -64 and -150 in the rrnA P1 UAS. Binding of FIS to this 'far upstream sequence' allows the recruitment of additional FIS molecules to the region. We demonstrate that, upon DNA relaxation, the maintenance of promoter activity requires, in addition to UAS, the presence of the far upstream sequence. The far upstream sequence shows no effect in the absence of an intact cluster. This requirement for the integrity of the region encompassing the far upstream sequence and the UAS cluster is correlated with the in vitro modulation of binding of FIS to UAS and interaction of RNA polymerase with the UP element and the region around the transcriptional start point. Our results suggest that, at the rrnA P1 promoter, the entire region comprising the UAS and the far upstream sequence is involved in the assembly of the transcription initiation complex. We propose that the extensive engagement of upstream DNA in this nucleoprotein complex locally compensates for the lack of torsional strain in relaxed DNA, thus increasing the resistance of the promoter to global DNA relaxation.

Activation of transcription initiation from a stable RNA promoter by a Fis protein-mediated DNA structural transmission mechanism

The leuV operon of Escherichia coli encodes three of the four genes for the tRNA1Leu isoacceptors. Transcription from this and other stable RNA promoters is known to be affected by a cis-acting UP element and by Fis protein interactions with the carboxyl-terminal domain of the alpha-subunits of RNA polymerase. In this report, we suggest that transcription from the leuV promoter also is activated by a Fis-mediated, DNA supercoiling-dependent mechanism similar to the IHF-mediated mechanism described previously for the ilvP(G) promoter (S. D. Sheridan et al., 1998, J Biol Chem 273: 21298-21308). We present evidence that Fis binding results in the translocation of superhelical energy from the promoter-distal portion of a supercoiling-induced DNA duplex destabilized (SIDD) region to the promoter-proximal portion of the leuV promoter that is unwound within the open complex. A mutant Fis protein, which is defective in contacting the carboxyl-terminal domain of the alpha-subunits of RNA polymerase, remains competent for stimulating open complex formation, suggesting that this DNA supercoiling-dependent component of Fis-mediated activation occurs in the absence of specific protein interactions between Fis and RNA polymerase. Fis-mediated translocation of superhelical energy from upstream binding sites to the promoter region may be a general feature of Fis-mediated activation of transcription at stable RNA promoters, which often contain A+T-rich upstream sequences.

DNA topology-mediated control of global gene expression in Escherichia coli

Because the level of DNA superhelicity varies with the cellular energy charge, it can change rapidly in response to a wide variety of altered nutritional and environmental conditions. This is a global alteration, affecting the entire chromosome and the expression levels of all operons whose promoters are sensitive to superhelicity. In this way, the global pattern of gene expression may be dynamically tuned to changing needs of the cell under a wide variety of circumstances. In this article, we propose a model in which chromosomal superhelicity serves as a global regulator of gene expression in Escherichia coli, tuning expression patterns across multiple operons, regulons, and stimulons to suit the growth state of the cell. This model is illustrated by the DNA supercoiling-dependent mechanisms that coordinate basal expression levels of operons of the ilv regulon both with one another and with cellular growth conditions.

Kinetic properties of rrn promoters in Escherichia coli

How do bacteria adapt and optimize their growth in response to different environments? The answer to this question is intimately related to the control of ribosome bio-synthesis. During the last decades numerous proposals have been made to explain this control but none has been definitive. To readdress the problem, we have used measurements of rRNA synthesis rates and rrn gene dosages in E. coli to find the absolute transcription rates of the average rrn operon (transcripts per min per operon) at different growth rates. By combining these rates with lacZ expression data from rRNA promoter-lacZ fusions, the abolute activities of the isolated rrnB P1 and P2 promoters were determined as functions of the growth rate in the presence and absence of Fis and of the effector ppGpp. The promoter activity data were analyzed to obtain the relative concentrations of free RNA polymerase, [R(f)], and the ratio of the Michaelis-Menten parameters, V(max)/K(m) (promoter strength), that characterize the promoter-RNA polymerase interaction. The results indicate that changes in the basal concentration of ppGpp can account for all growth-medium dependent regulation of the rrn P1 promoter strength. The P1 promoter strength was maximal when Fis was present and the level of ppGpp was undetectable during growth in rich media or in ppGpp-deficient strains; this maximal strength was 3-fold reduced when Fis was removed and the level of ppGpp remained undetectable. At ppGpp levels above 55 pmol per cell mass unit (OD(460)) during growth in poor media, the P1 promoter strength was minimal and not affected by the presence or absence of fis. The half-maximal value occurred at 20 pmol ppGpp/OD(460) and corresponds to an intracellular concentration of about 50 microM. In connection with previously published data, the results suggest that ppGpp reduces the P1 promoter strength directly, by binding RNA polymerase, and indirectly, by inhibiting the synthesis of Fis.

Equilibrium denaturation studies of the Escherichia coli factor for inversion stimulation: implications for in vivo function

The Factor for Inversion Stimulation (FIS) is a dimeric DNA binding protein found in enteric bacteria that is involved in various cellular processes, including stimulation of certain specialized DNA recombination events and transcription regulation of a large number of genes. The intracellular FIS concentration, when cells are grown in rich media, varies dramatically during the early logarithmic growth phase. Its broad range of concentrations could potentially affect the nature of its quaternary structure, which in turn, could affect its ability to function in vivo. Thus, we examined the stability of FIS homodimers under a wide range of concentrations relevant to in vivo expression levels. Its urea-induced equilibrium denaturation was monitored by far- and near-UV circular dichroism (CD), tyrosine fluorescence, and tyrosine fluorescence anisotropy. The denaturation transitions obtained were concentration-dependent and showed similar midpoints (C(m)) and m values, suggesting a two-state denaturation process involving the native dimer and unfolded monomers (N(2) <--> 2U). The DeltaG(H(2)O) for the unfolding of FIS determined from global and individual curve fitting was 14.2 kcal/mole. At concentrations <9 microM, the FIS dimer began to dissociate, as noted by the change in CD signal and size-exclusion high-pressure liquid chromatography retention times and peak width. The estimated dimer dissociation constant based on the CD and size-exclusion chromatography data is in the micromolar range, resulting in a DeltaG(H(2)O) of at least 5 kcal/mole less than that calculated from the urea denaturation data. This discrepancy suggests a deviation from a two-state denaturation model, perhaps due to a marginally stable monomeric intermediate. These observations have implications for the stability and function of FIS in vivo.

Promoter protection by a transcription factor acting as a local topological homeostat

Binding of the Escherichia coli global transcription factor FIS to the upstream activating sequence (UAS) of stable RNA promoters activates transcription on the outgrowth of cells from stationary phase. Paradoxically, while these promoters require negative supercoiling of DNA for optimal activity, FIS counteracts the increase of negative superhelical density by DNA gyrase. We demonstrate that binding of FIS at the UAS protects the rrnA P1 promoter from inactivation at suboptimal superhelical densities. This effect is correlated with FIS-dependent constraint of writhe and facilitated untwisting of promoter DNA. We infer that FIS maintains stable RNA transcription by stabilizing local writhe in the UAS. These results suggest a novel mechanism of transcriptional regulation by a transcription factor acting as a local topological homeostat.

Architecture of Fis-activated transcription complexes at the Escherichia coli rrnB P1 and rrnE P1 promoters

The transcription factor Fis activates the Escherichia coli rRNA promoters rrnB P1 and rrnE P1 by binding to sites centered at -71 and -72, respectively, and interacting with the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP alphaCTD). To understand the mechanism of activation by Fis at these promoters, we used oriented alpha-heterodimeric RNAPs and heterodimers of Fis to determine whether one or both subunits of alpha and Fis participate in the alphaCTD-Fis interaction. Our results imply that only one alphaCTD in the alpha dimer and only one activation-proficient subunit in the Fis dimer are required for activation by Fis. A library of alanine substitutions in alpha was used to identify the alphaCTD determinants required for Fis-dependent transcription at rrnB P1 and rrnE P1. We propose that the transcriptional activation region of the promoter-proximal subunit of the Fis dimer interacts with a determinant that includes E273 of one alphaCTD to activate transcription. We further suggest that the Fis contact to alphaCTD results in alphaCTD interactions with DNA that differ somewhat from those that occur at UP elements in the absence of Fis. The accompanying paper shows that the 273 determinant on alphaCTD is also targeted by Fis at the proP P2 promoter where the activator binds overlapping the -35 hexamer. Thus, similar Fis-alphaCTD interactions are used for activation of transcription when the activator is bound at very different positions on the DNA.

mRNA composition and control of bacterial gene expression

The expression of any given bacterial protein is predicted to depend on (i) the transcriptional regulation of the promoter and the translational regulation of its mRNA and (ii) the synthesis and translation of total (bulk) mRNA. This is because total mRNA acts as a competitor to the specific mRNA for the binding of initiation-ready free ribosomes. To characterize the effects of mRNA competition on gene expression, the specific activity of beta-galactosidase expressed from three different promoter-lacZ fusions (P(spc)-lacZ, P(RNAI)-lacZ, and P(RNAII)-lacZ) was measured (i) in a relA(+) background during exponential growth at different rates and (ii) in relA(+) and DeltarelA derivatives of Escherichia coli B/r after induction of a mild stringent or a relaxed response to raise or lower, respectively, the level of ppGpp. Expression from all three promoters was stimulated during slow exponential growth or at elevated levels of ppGpp and was reduced during fast exponential growth or at lower levels of ppGpp. From these observations and from other considerations, we propose (i) that the concentration of free, initiation-ready ribosomes is approximately constant and independent of the growth rate and (ii) that bulk mRNA made during slow growth and at elevated levels of ppGpp is less efficiently translated than bulk mRNA made during fast growth and at reduced levels of ppGpp. These features lead to an indirect enhancement in the expression of LacZ (or of any other protein) during growth in media of poor nutritional quality and at increased levels of ppGpp.

Activities of constitutive promoters in Escherichia coli

The in vivo activities of seven constitutive promoters in Escherichia coli have been determined as functions of growth rate in wild-type relA+ spoT+ strains with normal levels of guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) and in ppGpp-deficient DeltarelADeltaspoT derivatives. The promoters include (i) the spc ribosomal protein operon promotor Pspc; (ii) the beta-lactamase gene promotor Pblaof plasmid pBR322; (iii) the PLpromoter of phage lambda; (iv) and (v) the replication control promoters PRNAIand PRNAIIof plasmid pBR322; and (vi) and (vii) the P1 and P2 promoters of the rrnB ribosomal RNA operon. Each strain carried an operon fusion consisting of one of the respective promoter regions linked to lacZ and recombined into the chromosome at the mal locus of a lac deletion strain. The amount of 5'-terminal lacZ mRNA and of beta-galactosidase activity expressed from these promoters were determined by standard hybridization or enzyme activity assays, respectively. In addition, DNA, RNA and protein measurements were used to obtain information about gene dosage, rRNA synthesis and translation rates. By combining lacZ mRNA hybridization data with gene dosage and rRNA synthesis data, the absolute activity of the different promoters, in transcripts/minute per promoter, was determined. In ppGpp-proficient (relA+ spoT+) strains, the respective activities of rrnB P1 and P2 increased 40 and fivefold with increasing growth rate between 0.7 and 3.0 doublings/hour. The activities of Pspc, PL, Pbla, and PRNAIincreased two- to threefold and reached a maximum at growth rates above 2.0 doublings/hour. In contrast, PRNAIIactivity decreased threefold over this range of growth rates. In ppGpp-deficient (DeltarelA DeltaspoT) bacterial strains, the activities of rrnB P1 and P2 promoters both increased about twofold between 1.6 and 3.0 doublings/hour, whereas the activities of Pspc, PL, Pbla, and PRNAI, and PRNAIIwere about constant. To explain these observations, we suggest that the cellular concentration of free RNA polymerase increases with increasing growth rate; for saturation the P1 and P2 rRNA promoters require a high RNA polymerase concentration that is approached only at the highest growth rates, whereas the other promoters are saturated at lower polymerase concentrations achieved at intermediate growth rates. In addition, the data indicate that the respective rrnB P1 and PRNAIIpromoters were under negative and positive control by ppGpp. This caused a reduced activity of rrnB P1 and an increased activity of PRNAIIduring slow growth in wild-type (relA+ spoT+) relative to ppGpp-deficient (DeltarelA DeltaspoT) bacterial strains.

Activation of Escherichia coli leuV transcription by FIS

The transcription factor FIS has been implicated in the regulation of several stable RNA promoters, including that for the major tRNALeu species in Escherichia coli, tRNA1Leu. However, no evidence for direct involvement of FIS in tRNA1Leu expression has been reported. We show here that FIS binds to a site upstream of the leuV promoter (centered at -71) and that it directly stimulates leuV transcription in vitro. A mutation in the FIS binding site reduces transcription from a leuV promoter in strains containing FIS but has no effect on transcription in strains lacking FIS, indicating that FIS contributes to leuV expression in vivo. We also find that RNA polymerase forms an unusual heparin-sensitive complex with the leuV promoter, having a downstream protection boundary of approximately -7, and that the first two nucleotides of the transcript, GTP and UTP, are required for formation of a heparin-stable complex that extends downstream of the transcription start site. These studies have implications for the regulation of leuV transcription.

Conformational changes of the upstream DNA mediated by H-NS and FIS regulate E. coli RrnB P1 promoter activity

The two proteins FIS and H-NS had previously been shown to regulate ribosomal RNA (rRNA) transcription by interacting with the promoter upstream DNA. FIS is known as an activator whereas H-NS had been demonstrated to function as a repressor. Details of the antagonistic control mechanisms are not yet solved. Here, we have addressed the question how the two proteins cooperate to exert both, positive and negative control of rRNA transcription. By mobility shift experiments and footprinting studies we show that FIS and H-NS binding sites partially overlap but appear to interact with different sites of a curved DNA helix. Although not mutually exclusive, the two proteins compete each other for binding. Both proteins, by changing the DNA curvature, effect circularization reactions of DNA fragments in different ways. Our results imply that binding of the proteins induces alternate DNA conformations with favourable or unfavourable topology for the formation of active transcription complexes. Together the findings presented here help to answer some of the open questions about the concerted molecular mechanism of transcription factors for the regulation of stable RNA synthesis.

Upstream A-tracts increase bacterial promoter activity through interactions with the RNA polymerase alpha subunit

Upstream A-tracts stimulate transcription from a variety of bacterial promoters, and this has been widely attributed to direct effects of the intrinsic curvature of A-tract-containing DNA. In this work we report experiments that suggest a different mechanism for the effects of upstream A-tracts on transcription. The similarity of A-tract-containing sequences to the adenine- and thymine-rich upstream recognition elements (UP elements) found in some bacterial promoters suggested that A-tracts might increase promoter activity by interacting with the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP). We found that an A-tract-containing sequence placed upstream of the Escherichia coli lac or rrnB P1 promoters stimulated transcription both in vivo and in vitro, and that this stimulation required the C-terminal (DNA-binding) domain of the RNAP alpha subunit. The A-tract sequence was protected by wild-type RNAP but not by alpha-mutant RNAPs in footprints. The effect of the A-tracts on transcription was not as great as that of the most active UP elements, consistent with the degree of similarity of the A-tract sequence to the UP element consensus. A-tracts functioned best when positioned close to the -35 hexamer rather than one helical turn farther upstream, similar to the positioning optimal for UP element function. We conclude that A-tracts function as UP elements, stimulating transcription by providing binding site(s) for the RNAP alphaCTD, and we suggest that these interactions could contribute to the previously described wrapping of promoter DNA around RNAP.

Identification and characterization of the fis operon in enteric bacteria

The small DNA binding protein Fis is involved in several different biological processes in Escherichia coli. It has been shown to stimulate DNA inversion reactions mediated by the Hin family of recombinases, stimulate integration and excision of phage lambda genome, regulate the transcription of several different genes including those of stable RNA operons, and regulate the initiation of DNA replication at oriC. fis has also been isolated from Salmonella typhimurium, and the genomic sequence of Haemophilus influenzae reveals its presence in this bacteria. This work extends the characterization of fis to other organisms. Very similar fis operon structures were identified in the enteric bacteria Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, Erwinia carotovora, and Proteus vulgaris but not in several nonenteric bacteria. We found that the deduced amino acid sequences for Fis are 100% identical in K. pneumoniae, S. marcescens, E. coli, and S. typhimurium and 96 to 98% identical when E. carotovora and P. vulgaris Fis are considered. The deduced amino acid sequence for H. influenzae Fis is about 80% identical and 90% similar to Fis in enteric bacteria. However, in spite of these similarities, the E. carotovora, P. vulgaris, and H. influenzae Fis proteins are not functionally identical. An open reading frame (ORF1) preceding fis in E. coli is also found in all these bacteria, and their deduced amino acid sequences are also very similar. The sequence preceding ORF1 in the enteric bacteria showed a very strong similarity to the E. coli fis P region from -53 to +27 and the region around -116 containing an ihf binding site. Both beta-galactosidase assays and primer extension assays showed that these regions function as promoters in vivo and are subject to growth phase-dependent regulation. However, their promoter strengths vary, as do their responses to Fis autoregulation and integration host factor stimulation.

Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12, edition 10: the traditional map

This map is an update of the edition 9 map by Berlyn et al. (M. K. B. Berlyn, K. B. Low, and K. E. Rudd, p. 1715-1902, in F. C. Neidhardt et al., ed., Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1996). It uses coordinates established by the completed sequence, expressed as 100 minutes for the entire circular map, and adds new genes discovered and established since 1996 and eliminates those shown to correspond to other known genes. The latter are included as synonyms. An alphabetical list of genes showing map location, synonyms, the protein or RNA product of the gene, phenotypes of mutants, and reference citations is provided. In addition to genes known to correspond to gene sequences, other genes, often older, that are described by phenotype and older mapping techniques and that have not been correlated with sequences are included.

RNA polymerase mutants that destabilize RNA polymerase-promoter complexes alter NTP-sensing by rrn P1 promoters

Mutations in Escherichia coli rpoB or rpoC, selected for the ability to confer prototrophy on relA spoT strains, were found to affect transcription from rrn P1 promoters. Two mutant strains (beta RH454 and beta' delta 215-220) reduced transcription of rrn P1 core promoter-lacZ fusions but not of control promoter-lacZ fusions. Purified mutant RNAPs formed complexes with rrn P1 promoters that were much less stable than those formed by wild-type RNAP and required high concentrations of the initiating NTP for efficient rrn P1 transcription. The instability of the rrn P1 core promoter complexes with the mutant RNAPs and their altered regulatory properties support a recently proposed model for the control of rRNA transcription by changing concentrations of the initiating NTPs. We further suggest that destabilization of promoter complexes by the mutant RNAPs mimics effects of ppGpp, decreasing or increasing transcription depending on the kinetic properties of the specific promoter.

Influence of FIS on the transcription from closely spaced and non-overlapping divergent promoters for an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase gene (gltX) and a tRNA operon (valU) in Escherichia coli

The gltX gene, encoding the glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS), and the valU operon, whose transcripts contain three tRNAVal/UAC and one tRNALys/UUU, are adjacent and divergently transcribed. It is the only known case of adjacent genes encoding an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase and a tRNA precursor in Escherichia coli. The gltX promoters (P1, P2 and P3) direct the synthesis of transcripts non-overlapping with and divergent from the one initiated at the valU promoter. We report that their promoter region (250 bp) contains three binding sites for the factor for inversion stimulation (FIS), centred at positions -71, -91 and -112 from the valU transcription initiation site, and that the destruction of any of these sites does not prevent the binding of FIS to the others. As FIS is one of the major positive regulators of stable RNA operons, we have studied its role on gltX and valU transcription. FIS stimulates valU transcription in vitro and about twofold in vivo during steady-state exponential growth. In contrast, gltX transcription is repressed by the presence of FIS in vitro and about twofold in vivo during growth acceleration when a decrease in GluRS concentration was observed. Under all conditions tested, most of the gltX transcripts start at the P3 promoter. Nested deletions of this regulatory region reveal that the FIS-dependent repression of the gltX-P3 promoter is abolished after the removal of the valU promoter, and is not altered by the additional removal of the FIS binding sites; moreover, in vivo transcription from gltX-P1 and/or gltX-P2 present on some of these regulatory region variants is modulated by the nature of the upstream region by FIS and is sometimes stronger than that from gltX-P3. These results show that the strength and the site of gltX transcription initiation are influenced by the upstream region up to and including the valU promoter; furthermore, they indicate that although these adjacent genes are involved in the first step of protein biosynthesis and share cis and trans regulatory elements, their transcription is non-co-ordinate.

Activation of Escherichia coli rRNA transcription by FIS during a growth cycle

rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli is activated by the FIS protein, which binds upstream of rrnp1 promoters and interacts directly with RNA polymerase. Analysis of the contribution of FIS to rrn transcription under changing physiological conditions is complicated by several factors: the wide variation in cellular FIS concentrations with growth conditions, the contributions of several other regulatory systems to rRNA synthesis, and the pleiotropy of fis mutations. In this report, we show by in vivo footprinting and Western blot analysis that occupancy of the rrnBp1 FIS sites correlates with cellular levels of FIS. We find, using two methods of measurement (pulse induction of a FIS-activated hybrid promoter and primer extension from an unstable transcript made from rrnBp1), that the extent of transcription activation by FIS parallels the degree of FIS site occupancy and therefore cellular FIS levels. FIS activates transcription throughout exponential growth at low culture density, but rrnp1 transcription increases independently of FIS immediately following upshift, before FIS accumulates. These results support the model that FIS is one of a set of overlapping signals that together contribute to transcription from rrnp1 promoters during steady-state growth.

Information analysis of Fis binding sites

Originally discovered in the bacteriophage Mu DNA inversion system gin, Fis (Factor for Inversion Stimulation) regulates many genetic systems. To determine the base frequency conservation required for Fis to locate its binding sites, we collected a set of 60 experimentally defined wild-type Fis DNA binding sequences. The sequence logo for Fis binding sites showed the significance and likely kinds of base contacts, and these are consistent with available experimental data. Scanning with an information theory based weight matrix within fis, nrd, tgt/sec and gin revealed Fis sites not previously identified, but for which there are published footprinting and biochemical data. DNA mobility shift experiments showed that a site predicted to be 11 bases from the proximal Salmonella typhimurium hin site and a site predicted to be 7 bases from the proximal P1 cin site are bound by Fis in vitro. Two predicted sites separated by 11 bp found within the nrd promoter region, and one in the tgt/sec promoter, were also confirmed by gel shift analysis. A sequence in aldB previously reported to be a Fis site, for which information theory predicts no site, did not shift. These results demonstrate that information analysis is useful for predicting Fis DNA binding.

The transactivation region of the fis protein that controls site-specific DNA inversion contains extended mobile beta-hairpin arms

The Fis protein regulates site-specific DNA inversion catalyzed by a family of DNA invertases when bound to a cis-acting recombinational enhancer. As is often found for transactivation domains, previous crystal structures have failed to resolve the conformation of the N-terminal inversion activation region within the Fis dimer. A new crystal form of a mutant Fis protein now reveals that the activation region contains two beta-hairpin arms that protrude over 20 A from the protein core. Saturation mutagenesis identified the regulatory and structurally important amino acids. The most critical activating residues are located near the tips of the beta-arms. Disulfide cross-linking between the beta-arms demonstrated that they are highly flexible in solution and that efficient inversion activation can occur when the beta-arms are covalently linked together. The emerging picture for this regulatory motif is that contacts with the recombinase at the tip of the mobile beta-arms activate the DNA invertase in the context of an invertasome complex.

Clues and consequences of DNA bending in transcription

This review attempts to substantiate the notion that nonlinear DNA structures allow prokaryotic cells to evolve complex signal integration devices that, to some extent, parallel the transduction cascades employed by higher organisms to control cell growth and differentiation. Regulatory cascades allow the possibility of inserting additional checks, either positive or negative, in every step of the process. In this context, the major consequence of DNA bending in transcription is that promoter geometry becomes a key regulatory element. By using DNA bending, bacteria afford multiple metabolic control levels simply through alteration of promoter architecture, so that positive signals favor an optimal constellation of protein-protein and protein-DNA contacts required for activation. Additional effects of regulated DNA bending in prokaryotic promoters include the amplification and translation of small physiological signals into major transcriptional responses and the control of promoter specificity for cognate regulators.

Location, degree, and direction of DNA bending associated with the Hin recombinational enhancer sequence and Fis-enhancer complex

The Fis protein of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium stimulates several site-specific DNA recombination reactions, as well as transcription of a number of genes. Fis binds to a 15-bp core recognition sequence and induces DNA bending. Mutations in Fis which alter its ability to bend DNA have been shown to reduce the stimulatory activity of Fis in both site-specific recombination and transcription systems. To examine the role of DNA bending in the activity of the Fis-recombinational enhancer complex in Hin-mediated site-specific DNA inversion, we have determined the locations, degrees, and directions of DNA bends associated with the recombinational enhancer and the Fis-enhancer complex. Circular-permutation assays demonstrated that a sequence-directed DNA bend is associated with the Fis binding sites in the proximal and distal domains of the recombinational enhancer. Binding of Fis to its core recognition sequence significantly increases the degree of DNA bending associated with the proximal and distal domains. The degree of DNA bending induced by Fis binding depended on the DNA sequences flanking the core Fis binding site, with angles ranging from 42 to 69 degrees. Phasing analyses indicate that both the sequence-directed and the Fis-induced DNA bends associated with the proximal and distal domains face the minor groove of the DNA helix at the center of the Fis binding site. The positions and directions of DNA bends associated with the Fis-recombinational complex support a direct role for Fis-induced DNA bending in assembly of the active invertasome.

FIS activates sequential steps during transcription initiation at a stable RNA promoter

FIS (factor for inversion stimulation) is a small dimeric DNA-bending protein which both stimulates DNA inversion and activates transcription at stable RNA promoters in Escherichia coli. Both these processes involve the initial formation of a complex nucleoprotein assembly followed by local DNA untwisting at a specific site. We have demonstrated previously that at the tyrT promoter three FIS dimers are required to form a nucleoprotein complex with RNA polymerase. We now show that this complex is structurally dynamic and that FIS, uniquely for a prokaryotic transcriptional activator, facilitates sequential steps in the initiation process, enabling efficient polymerase recruitment, untwisting of DNA at the transcription startpoint and finally the escape of polymerase from the promoter. Activation of all these steps requires that the three FIS dimers bind in helical register. We suggest that FIS acts by stabilizing a DNA microloop whose topology is coupled to the local topological transitions generated during the initiation of transcription.

Molecular anatomy of a transcription activation patch: FIS-RNA polymerase interactions at the Escherichia coli rrnB P1 promoter

FIS, a site-specific DNA binding and bending protein, is a global regulator of gene expression in Escherichia coli. The ribosomal RNA promoter rrnB P1 is activated 3- to 7-fold in vivo by a FIS dimer that binds a DNA site immediately upstream of the DNA binding site for the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP). In this report, we identify several FIS side chains important specifically for activation of transcription at rrnB P1. These side chains map to positions 68, 71 and 74, in and flanking a surface-exposed loop adjacent to the helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif of the protein. We also present evidence suggesting that FIS activates transcription at rrnB P1 by interacting with the RNAP alphaCTD. Our results suggest a model for FIS-mediated activation of transcription at rrnB P1 that involves interactions between FIS and the RNAP alphaCTD near the DNA surface. Although FIS and the transcription activator protein CAP have little structural similarity, they both bend DNA, use a similarly disposed activation loop and target the same region of the RNAP alphaCTD, suggesting that this is a common architecture at bacterial promoters.

rRNA transcription and growth rate-dependent regulation of ribosome synthesis in Escherichia coli

The synthesis of ribosomal RNA is the rate-limiting step in ribosome synthesis in bacteria. There are multiple mechanisms that determine the rate of rRNA synthesis. Ribosomal RNA promoter sequences have evolved for exceptional strength and for regulation in response to nutritional conditions and amino acid availability. Strength derives in part from an extended RNA polymerase (RNAP) recognition region involving at least two RNAP subunits, in part from activation by a transcription factor and in part from modification of the transcript by a system that prevents premature termination. Regulation derives from at least two mechanistically distinct systems, growth rate-dependent control and stringent control. The mechanisms contributing to rRNA transcription work together and compensate for one another when individual systems are rendered inoperative.

The Escherichia coli Fis protein prevents initiation of DNA replication from oriC in vitro

Fis protein participates in the normal control of chromosomal replication in Escherichia coli. However, the mechanism by which it executes its effect is largely unknown. We demonstrate an inhibitory influence of purified Fis protein on replication from oriC in vitro. Fis inhibits DNA synthesis equally well in replication systems either dependent upon or independent of RNA polymerase, even when the latter is stimulated by the presence of HU or IHF. The extent of inhibition by Fis is modulated by the concentrations of DnaA protein and RNA polymerase; the more limiting the amounts of these, the more severe the inhibition by Fis. Thus, the level of inhibition seems to depend on the ease with which the open complex can be formed. Fis-mediated inhibition of DNA replication does not depend on a functional primary Fis binding site between DnaA boxes R2 and R3 in oriC, as mutations that cause reduced binding of Fis to this site do not affect the degree of inhibition. The data presented suggest that Fis prevents formation of an initiation-proficient structure at oriC by forming an alternative, initiation-preventive complex. This indicates a negative role for Fis in the regulation of replication initiation.

A positive control mutant of the transcription activator protein FIS

The FIS protein is a transcription activator of rRNA and other genes in Escherichia coli. We have identified mutants of the FIS protein resulting in reduced rrnB P1 transcription activation that nevertheless retain the ability to bind DNA in vivo. The mutations map to amino acid 74, the N-terminal amino acid of the protein's helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif, and to amino acids 71 and 72 in the adjoining surface-exposed loop. In vitro analyses of one of the activation-defective mutants (with a G-to-S mutation at position 72) indicates that it binds to and bends rrnB P1 FIS site I DNA the same as wild-type FIS. These data suggest that amino acids in this region of FIS are required for transcription activation by contacting RNA polymerase directly, independent of any other role(s) this region may play in DNA binding or protein-induced bending.

Analysis of the shut-off of ribosomal RNA promoters in Escherichia coli upon entering the stationary phase of growth

Most bacterial RNA consists of stable RNA which is composed of rRNA and tRNA. We have followed by primer extension analysis the level of ribosomal RNA synthesis along the growth phases of a cell culture. A sharp drop in rRNA synthesis was observed upon the transition from the exponential to the stationary phase of growth. Our results demonstrate that an effective shut-off of rRNA synthesis occurs also in the absence of ppGpp. Mutations in the host factors Fis and H-NS, which are known to regulate rrn P1 promoters, did not affect the shut-off process of ribosomal RNA promoters. We also tested the effect of RpoS, the sigma factor known to induce a number of genes in the stationary phase. It was shown that the host factors Fis, H-NS and RpoS do not play a major role in the regulation of the shut-off process of rRNA synthesis. The results presented demonstrate that the rate of rRNA synthesis provides a sensitive measure of the growth phase of the bacterial culture.

Control of rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli

The control of rRNA synthesis in response to both extra- and intracellular signals has been a subject of interest to microbial physiologists for nearly four decades, beginning with the observations that Salmonella typhimurium cells grown on rich medium are larger and contain more RNA than those grown on poor medium. This was followed shortly by the discovery of the stringent response in Escherichia coli, which has continued to be the organism of choice for the study of rRNA synthesis. In this review, we summarize four general areas of E. coli rRNA transcription control: stringent control, growth rate regulation, upstream activation, and anti-termination. We also cite similar mechanisms in other bacteria and eukaryotes. The separation of growth rate-dependent control of rRNA synthesis from stringent control continues to be a subject of controversy. One model holds that the nucleotide ppGpp is the key effector for both mechanisms, while another school holds that it is unlikely that ppGpp or any other single effector is solely responsible for growth rate-dependent control. Recent studies on activation of rRNA synthesis by cis-acting upstream sequences has led to the discovery of a new class of promoters that make contact with RNA polymerase at a third position, called the UP element, in addition to the well-known -10 and -35 regions. Lastly, clues as to the role of antitermination in rRNA operons have begun to appear. Transcription complexes modified at the antiterminator site appear to elongate faster and are resistant to the inhibitory effects of ppGpp during the stringent response.

Effects of different growth conditions on the in vivo activity of the tandem Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA promoters P1 and P2

We have analyzed the relative activities of the Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA promoters P1 and P2 in vivo under different physiological conditions. Promoter efficiencies were determined by quantitative comparison of the transcript-specific primer extension products obtained from total RNA preparations. Cells were analyzed at different stages of the growth cycle, at different growth rates, and under conditions of stringent control. In addition, the rRNA gene dosage was altered by transformation with plasmids containing additional rrnD or rrnB transcription units, or rRNA operons in which one of the tandem promoters (P1) had been deleted. Under conditions of amino acid starvation (stringent control) we observed the expected strong reduction in P1-directed transcription. In contrast to the previous assumption that the P2 promoter is not regulated, we simultaneously noticed a smaller but significant repression of P2-directed transcription. In strains in which the rRNA gene dosage was increased by transformation with plasmids bearing rRNA transcription units, a similar degree of repression was observed. Repression of the P1 promoter activity was increased, however, when cells contained extra rRNA operons with P2 promoters only. As demonstrated under stringent control conditions, changes in the growth cycle also affected the activity of promoters P1 and P2. A greater proportion of P2-derived transcripts was observed when cells changed from exponential to stationary growth or if cultures were grown in minimal medium. Under steady-state, slow growth conditions (minimal medium) we obtained evidence showing that the ratio of P1/P2 transcription products is much lower for cells with extra rrnB as compared to extra rrnD operons or cells lacking extra rRNA operons, implying an operon-specific regulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Guanosine tetraphosphate as a global regulator of bacterial RNA synthesis: a model involving RNA polymerase pausing and queuing

A recently reported comparison of stable RNA (rRNA, tRNA) and mRNA synthesis rates in ppGpp-synthesizing and ppGpp-deficient (delta relA delta spoT) bacteria has suggested that ppGpp inhibits transcription initiation from stable RNA promoters, as well as synthesis of (bulk) mRNA. Inhibition of stable RNA synthesis occurs mainly during slow growth of bacteria when cytoplasmic levels of ppGpp are high. In contrast, inhibition of mRNA occurs mainly during fast growth when ppGpp levels are low, and it is associated with a partial inactivation of RNA polymerase. To explain these observations it has been proposed that ppGpp causes transcriptional pausing and queuing during the synthesis of mRNA. Polymerase queuing requires high rates of transcription initiation in addition to polymerase pausing, and therefore high concentrations of free RNA polymerase. These conditions are found in fast growing bacteria. Furthermore, the RNA polymerase queues lead to a promoter blocking when RNA polymerase molecules stack up from the pause site back to the (mRNA) promoter. This occurs most frequently at pause sites close to the promoter. Blocking of mRNA promoters diverts RNA polymerase to stable RNA promoters. In this manner ppGpp could indirectly stimulate synthesis of stable RNA at high growth rates. In the present work a mathematical analysis, based on the theory of queuing, is presented and applied to the global control of transcription in bacteria. This model predicts the in vivo distribution of RNA polymerase over stable RNA and mRNA genes for both ppGpp-synthesizing and ppGpp-deficient bacteria in response to different environmental conditions. It also shows how small changes in basal ppGpp concentrations can produce large changes in the rate of stable RNA synthesis.

Control of the Escherichia coli rrnB P1 promoter strength by ppGpp

Fusions of the rrnB P1 and P2 promoters, and of the tandem P1-P2 combination, to a wild-type lacZ gene were constructed on plasmids and recombined into the mal region of the bacterial chromosome, close to the normal location and in the normal orientation of rrnB. The upstream activator region (Fis-binding sites) was always present with the P1 promoter, and all constructs contained the box A antitermination site of rRNA genes. Using these constructs, beta-galactosidase specific activities were measured in Escherichia coli strains carrying either both ppGpp synthetases, PSI and PSII (relA+ spoT+), or only PSII (delta relA spoT+), or neither (delta relA delta spoT), using different media supporting growth rates between 0.6 and 2.8 doublings/h at 37 degrees C. The beta-galactosidase activities were used to estimate the relative strength of the rrnB P1 promoter in comparison to the isolated rrnB P2 promoter. Promoter strength (transcripts initiated per min per promoter per free RNA polymerase concentration) was distinguished from promoter activity (transcripts initiated per min per promoter). In ppGpp-synthesizing (wild-type) bacteria, the relative strength of the rrnB P1 promoter increased nearly 10-fold with increasing growth rate from 0.17 to 1.5, but in the ppGpp-less double mutants it decreased by 20% from 1.7 to 1.5. Thus, at low or zero levels of ppGpp, the P1 promoter was 1.5-1.7 times stronger than the isolated P2 promoter. These results indicate that the normal growth rate control of the rrnB P1 promoter strength requires ppGpp, and that the strength is reduced at basal levels of ppGpp found during exponential growth. No additional ppGpp-independent control of the rrnB P1 promoter strength was evident. From the beta-galactosidase data and previously determined values of rRNA gene activities, the activities of the isolated rrnB P1 and P2 promoters, and of the P2 promoter in the tandem combination, were estimated. With increasing growth rate, the activity of the isolated P2 promoter increased 6-fold from 6 to 33 initiations/min, while the activity of the isolated P1 promoter increased 24-fold from 2 to 54 initiations/min. The increasing activity of the isolated P2 promoter is assumed to reflect the increasing RNA polymerase concentration at constant promoter strength, whereas the steeper increase in P1 promoter activity reflects increases in both polymerase concentration and promoter strength. When in tandem with P1, the P2 promoter activity is inferred to decrease as the P1 promoter activity increases.

Sequence, regulation, and functions of fis in Salmonella typhimurium

The fis operon from Salmonella typhimurium has been cloned and sequenced, and the properties of Fis-deficient and Fis-constitutive strains were examined. The overall fis operon organization in S. typhimurium is the same as that in Escherichia coli, with the deduced Fis amino acid sequences being identical between both species. While the open reading frames upstream of fis have diverged slightly, the promoter regions between the two species are also identical between -49 and +94. Fis protein and mRNA levels fluctuated dramatically during the course of growth in batch cultures, peaking at approximately 40,000 dimers per cell in early exponential phase, and were undetectable after growth in stationary phase. fis autoregulation was less effective in S. typhimurium than that in E. coli, which can be correlated with the absence or reduced affinity of several Fis-binding sites in the S. typhimurium fis promoter region. Phenotypes of fis mutants include loss of Hin-mediated DNA inversion, cell filamentation, reduced growth rates in rich medium, and increased lag times when the mutants are subcultured after prolonged growth in stationary phase. On the other hand, cells constitutively expressing Fis exhibited normal logarithmic growth but showed a sharp reduction in survival during stationary phase. During the course of these studies, the sigma 28-dependent promoter within the hin-invertible segment that is responsible for fljB (H2) flagellin synthesis was precisely located.

Identification of genes negatively regulated by Fis: Fis and RpoS comodulate growth-phase-dependent gene expression in Escherichia coli

Fis is a nucleoid-associated protein in Escherichia coli that has been shown to regulate recombination, replication, and transcription reactions. It is expressed in a transient manner under batch culturing conditions such that high levels are present during early exponential phase and low levels are present during late exponential phase and stationary phase. We have screened a random collection of transposon-induced lac fusions for those which give decreased expression in the presence of Fis. Thirteen different Fis-repressed genes were identified, including glnQ (glutamine high-affinity transport), mglA (methyl-galactoside transport), xylF (D-xylose-binding protein), sdhA (succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit), and a newly identified aldehyde dehydrogenase, aldB. The LacZ expression patterns revealed that many of the fusions were maximally expressed at different stages of growth, including early log phase, mid- to late log phase, and stationary phase. The expression of some of the late-exponential- and stationary-phase genes was dependent on the RpoS sigma factor, whereas that of others was affected negatively by RpoS. We conclude that Fis negatively regulates a diverse set of genes and that RpoS can function to both activate and inhibit the expression of specific genes.

Effects of N-terminal deletions of the Escherichia coli protein Fis on growth rate, tRNA(2Ser) expression and cell morphology

The Escherichia coli Fis protein is known to be involved in a variety of processes, including the activation of stable RNA operons. In this paper we study the ability of a set of N-terminal Fis deletion mutants to stimulate transcription of the tRNA(2Ser) gene. The results indicate that the domain of the Fis protein containing residues 1-26 is not required for transcription activation. The Fis mutants that are still active in transcription stimulation can also complement the reduced growth rates of Fis- cells, suggesting that the same activating domain is involved in this phenomenon. In addition, we show that in fast growing cultures in the absence of an active Fis protein, minicells are formed. These minicells seem to arise from septum formation near the cell poles. Suppression of minicell formation by Fis also does not require the presence of the N-terminal domain of the protein.

Nucleoid proteins

This article examines the published evidence in support of the classification of organisms into three groups (Bacteria, Archae, and Eukarya) instead of two groups (prokaryotes and eukaryotes) and summarizes the comparative biochemistry of each of the known histone-like, nucleoid DNA-binding proteins. The molecular structures and amino acid sequences of Archae are more similar to those of Eukarya than of Bacteria, with a few exceptions. Cytochemical methodology employed for localizing these proteins in archaeal and bacterial cells has also been reviewed. It is becoming increasingly apparent that these proteins participate both in the organization of DNA and in the control of gene expression. Evidence obtained from biochemical properties, structural and functional differences, and the ultrastructural location of these proteins, as well as from gene mutations clearly justifies the division of prokaryotes into bacterial and archaeal groups. Indeed, chromosomes, whether they be nuclear, prokaryotic, or organellar, are invariably complexed with abundant, small, basic proteins that bind to DNA with low sequence specificity. These proteins include the histones, histone-like proteins, and nonhistone high mobility group (HMG) proteins.

Escherichia coli tyrT gene transcription is sensitive to DNA supercoiling in its native chromosomal context: effect of DNA topoisomerase IV overexpression on tyrT promoter function

We have investigated the in vivo DNA supercoiling sensitivity of the Escherichia coli tRNA(1tyr) gene (tyrT) promoter in its normal chromosomal location. Here, the native tyrT promoter is found to be exquisitely sensitive to mutations and to drugs which alter the level of DNA supercoiling. We show that the response of the tyrT promoter to supercoiling is qualitatively similar to that of a known supercoiling-sensitive tRNA gene promoter, hisR. Specifically, treatments which increase in vivo DNA supercoiling levels enhance transcription of these tRNA genes. Particularly striking is the strong enhancement of expression from both promoters by a transposon insertion mutation in the topA gene encoding DNA toposisomerase I. This phenotypic effect can be complemented by providing active topoisomerase I in trans from a recombinant plasmid. Interestingly, it can also be complemented by overexpression of the genes encoding the subunits of DNA topoisomerase IV. We believe that this is the first demonstration that DNA topoisomerase IV can influence gene expression and it suggests that DNA topoisomerase I is partially redundant, at least in E. coli.