The C terminus of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase is not essential for transcriptional activation of sigma 54 holoenzyme

The CRP-cAMP complex and downregulation of the glnAp2 promoter provides a novel regulatory linkage between carbon metabolism and nitrogen assimilation in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, glnA (encoding glutamine synthetase) is transcribed from two promoters (glnAp1 and glnAp2). The glnAp1 is a sigma(70)-dependent promoter that is activated by the cAMP receptor protein (CRP). Under nitrogen-deficient growth conditions, glnAp1 is repressed by NtrC-phosphate. The downstream glnAp2 promoter is sigma(54)-dependent and is activated by NtrC-phosphate. Here, we show that glnAp2 expression is affected by different carbon sources and that the CRP-cAMP complex inhibits the glnAp2 promoter activity. Primer extension and KMnO4 footprinting analysis indicate that the inhibitory effect is at the transcriptional level in vivo. When glnAp2 is activated by NifA, a similar inhibitory effect by CRP-cAMP is observed. Site-directed mutagenesis and deletion analysis indicate that the characterized and putative CRP-binding sites located in the upstream region of the glnAp2 promoter are not essential for the inhibitory effect. CRP-cAMP inhibits sigma(54)-dependent glnAp2 strongly, by 21-fold. By activating glnAp1 and downregulating glnAp2, the overall effect of CRP-cAMP on glnA expression is an approximately fourfold reduction, which correlates with the reduction of gamma-glutamyl transferase activities in the cells. We propose therefore that a physiological role of CRP-cAMP activation of glnAp1 is to partially compensate for CRP-cAMP downregulation of glnAp2, allowing a low but non-negligible level of expression of the important genes transcribed from it. A novel regulatory linkage between carbon and nitrogen regulons is proposed.

Transcriptional regulation at a distance in bacteria

Transcriptional enhancers are cis-acting DNA elements that are binding sites for regulatory proteins and function at large distances from promoter elements to stimulate transcription. Once thought to be unique to eukaryotes, enhancer-like elements have been discovered in a wide variety of bacteria. The regulatory proteins that bind to these bacterial enhancers must contact RNA polymerase to activate transcription. In principle, interactions between bacterial enhancer-binding proteins and RNA polymerase can occur by either DNA looping or tracking of the enhancer-binding protein along the DNA. Paradigms for each of these methods are found in bacterial systems. Activators of sigma(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzyme contact polymerase by DNA looping, while bacteriophage T4 gp45 functions as a sliding clamp that tracks along DNA until it engages RNA polymerase. Significant advances have been made over the last few years towards understanding the mechanisms by which bacterial enhancer-binding proteins activate transcription, but important aspects of these mechanisms are still poorly defined.

Active recruitment of sigma54-RNA polymerase to the Pu promoter of Pseudomonas putida: role of IHF and alphaCTD

The sequence elements determining the binding of the sigma54-containing RNA polymerase (sigma54-RNAP) to the Pu promoter of Pseudomonas putida have been examined. Contrary to previous results in related systems, we show that the integration host factor (IHF) binding stimulates the recruitment of the enzyme to the -12/-24 sequence motifs. Such a recruitment, which is fully independent of the activator of the system, XylR, requires the interaction of the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNAP with specific DNA sequences upstream of the IHF site which are reminiscent of the UP elements in sigma70 promoters. Our data show that this interaction is mainly brought about by the distinct geometry of the promoter region caused by IHF binding and the ensuing DNA bending. These results support the view that binding of sigma54-RNAP to a promoter is a step that can be subjected to regulation by factors (e.g. IHF) other than the sole intrinsic affinity of sigma54-RNAP for the -12/-24 site.

Activation and repression of E. coli promoters

There is no organism in which transcription initiation is better understood than Escherichia coli. Recent studies using genetics, biochemistry and structure analysis have revealed how RNA polymerase interactions at promoters are regulated. Prominent examples include the recruitment of polymerase by activators touching its alpha and sigma subunits; which subunit is touched depends on which activator is used and where it binds the DNA. The less-common cases centering on enhancer-dependent transcription use an entirely different mechanism, involving either DNA looping or tracking.

Protein crosslinking studies suggest that Rhizobium meliloti C4-dicarboxylic acid transport protein D, a sigma 54-dependent transcriptional activator, interacts with sigma 54 and the beta subunit of RNA polymerase

Rhizobium meliloti C4-dicarboxylic acid transport protein D (DCTD) activates transcription by a form of RNA polymerase holoenzyme that has sigma 54 as its sigma factor (referred to as E sigma 54). DCTD catalyzes the ATP-dependent isomerization of closed complexes between E sigma 54 and the dctA promoter to transcriptionally productive open complexes. Transcriptional activation probably involves specific protein-protein interactions between DCTD and E sigma 54. Interactions between sigma 54-dependent activators and E sigma 54 are transient, and there has been no report of a biochemical assay for contact between E sigma 54 and any activator to date. Heterobifunctional crosslinking reagents were used to examine protein-protein interactions between the various subunits of E sigma 54 and DCTD. DCTD was crosslinked to Salmonella typhimurium sigma 54 with the crosslinking reagents succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate and N-hydroxysulfosuccinimidyl-4-azidobenzoate. Cys-307 of sigma 54 was identified by site-directed mutagenesis as the residue that was crosslinked to DCTD. DCTD was also crosslinked to the beta subunit of Escherichia coli core RNA polymerase with succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate, but not with N-hydroxysulfosuccinimidyl-4-azidobenzoate. These data suggest that interactions of DCTD with sigma 54 and the beta subunit may be important for transcriptional activation and offer evidence for interactions between a sigma 54-dependent activator and sigma 54, as well as the beta subunit of RNA polymerase.

The C-terminal region of the alpha subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is required for transcriptional activation of the flagellar level II operons by the FlhD/FlhC complex

A number of transcription activators have been found to activate transcription via protein-protein contact between RNA polymerase alpha subunits and transcription factors; they are classified as class I factors. In this report, we demonstrate that the FlhD/FlhC complex, a transcription activator of the Escherichia coli flagellar regulon, requires the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit for transcription activation. We conclude that FlhD/FlhC is a class I transcription factor.

Identification of close contacts between the sigma N (sigma 54) protein and promoter DNA in closed promoter complexes

The complexes forming between the alternative sigma factor protein sigma N (sigma 54), its holoenzyme and promoter DNA were analysed using the hydroxyl radical probe and by photochemical footprinting of bromouridine-substituted DNA. Close contacts between the promoter, sigma N and its holoenzyme appear to be restricted predominantly to one face of the DNA helix, extending from -31 to -5. They all appear attributable to sigma N and no extra close contacts from the core RNA polymerase subunits in the holoenzyme-promoter DNA complex were detected. We suggest that the apparent absence of close core RNA polymerase contacts in the region of the promoter DNA to be melted during open complex formation is important for maintaining the closed complex. Results of the hydroxyl radical footprinting imply that sigma N makes multiple DNA backbone contacts across and beyond the -12, -24 consensus promoter elements, and the photochemical footprints indicate that consensus thymidine residues contribute important major groove contacts to sigma N. Formation of the open complex is shown to involve a major structural transition in the DNA contacted by sigma N, establishing a direct role for sigma N in formation of the activated promoter complex.

The TyrR protein of Escherichia coli is a class I transcription activator

The purified TyrR protein and phenylalanine were sufficient to activate in vitro transcription from the tyrP promoter by wild-type RNA polymerase. Such TyrR-mediated activation did not occur when the mutant alpha 235 RNA polymerase was used, indicating that TyrR is a class I transcription activator.

Genetic regulation of nitrogen fixation in rhizobia

This review presents a comparison between the complex genetic regulatory networks that control nitrogen fixation in three representative rhizobial species, Rhizobium meliloti, Bradyrhizobium japonicum, and Azorhizobium caulinodans. Transcription of nitrogen fixation genes (nif and fix genes) in these bacteria is induced primarily by low-oxygen conditions. Low-oxygen sensing and transmission of this signal to the level of nif and fix gene expression involve at least five regulatory proteins, FixL, FixJ, FixK, NifA, and RpoN (sigma 54). The characteristic features of these proteins and their functions within species-specific regulatory pathways are described. Oxygen interferes with the activities of two transcriptional activators, FixJ and NifA. FixJ activity is modulated via phosphorylation-dephosphorylation by the cognate sensor hemoprotein FixL. In addition to the oxygen responsiveness of the NifA protein, synthesis of NifA is oxygen regulated at the level of transcription. This type of control includes FixLJ in R. meliloti and FixLJ-FixK in A. caulinodans or is brought about by autoregulation in B. japonicum. NifA, in concert with sigma 54 RNA polymerase, activates transcription from -24/-12-type promoters associated with nif and fix genes and additional genes that are not directly involved in nitrogen fixation. The FixK proteins constitute a subgroup of the Crp-Fnr family of bacterial regulators. Although the involvement of FixLJ and FixK in nifA regulation is remarkably different in the three rhizobial species discussed here, they constitute a regulatory cascade that uniformly controls the expression of genes (fixNOQP) encoding a distinct cytochrome oxidase complex probably required for bacterial respiration under low-oxygen conditions. In B. japonicum, the FixLJ-FixK cascade also controls genes for nitrate respiration and for one of two sigma 54 proteins.

In vitro activity of NifL, a signal transduction protein for biological nitrogen fixation

In the free-living diazotroph Klebsiella pneumoniae, the NifA protein is required for transcription of all nif (nitrogen fixation) operons except the regulatory nifLA operon itself. NifA activates transcription of nif operons by the alternative holoenzyme form of RNA polymerase, sigma 54 holoenzyme. In vivo, NifL is known to antagonize the action of NifA in the presence of molecular oxygen or combined nitrogen. We now demonstrate inhibition by NifL in vitro in both a coupled transcription-translation system and a purified transcription system. Crude cell extracts containing NifL inhibit NifA activity in the coupled system, as does NifL that has been solubilized with urea and allowed to refold. Inhibition is specific to NifA in that it does not affect activation by NtrC, a transcriptional activator homologous to NifA, or transcription by sigma 70 holoenzyme. Renatured NifL also inhibits transcriptional activation by a maltose-binding protein fusion to NifA in a purified transcription system, indicating that no protein factor other than NifL is required. Since inhibition in the purified system persists anaerobically, our NifL preparation does not sense molecular oxygen directly.

In a class of its own--the RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma 54 (sigma N)

Bacteria synthesize a number of different sigma factors which allow the co-ordinate expression of groups of genes owing to the ability of sigma to confer promoter-specific transcription initiation on RNA polymerase. In nearly all cases these sigmas belong to a single family of proteins which appear to be related structurally and functionally to the major Escherichia coli sigma factor, sigma 70. A clear exception is the sigma factor sigma 54 (sigma N), encoded by rpoN, which represents a second family of sigmas that is widely distributed in prokaryotes. Studies of sigma 54 (sigma N) have demonstrated that this sigma is quite distinct both structurally and functionally from the sigma 70 family and the mode of transcription initiation which it mediates may have more in common with that found in eukaryotes than that which occurs with sigma 70 and its relatives.

A third recognition element in bacterial promoters: DNA binding by the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase

A DNA sequence rich in (A+T), located upstream of the -10, -35 region of the Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA promoter rrnB P1 and called the UP element, stimulates transcription by a factor of 30 in vivo, as well as in vitro in the absence of protein factors other than RNA polymerase (RNAP). When fused to other promoters, such as lacUV5, the UP element also stimulates transcription, indicating that it is a separate promoter module. Mutations in the carboxyl-terminal region of the alpha subunit of RNAP prevent stimulation of these promoters by the UP element although the mutant enzymes are effective in transcribing the "core" promoters (those lacking the UP element). Protection of UP element DNA by the mutant RNAPs is severely reduced in footprinting experiments, suggesting that the selective decrease in transcription might result from defective interactions between alpha and the UP element. Purified alpha binds specifically to the UP element, confirming that alpha acts directly in promoter recognition. Transcription of three other promoters was also reduced by the COOH-terminal alpha mutations. These results suggest that UP elements comprise a third promoter recognition region (in addition to the -10, -35 recognition hexamers, which interact with the sigma subunit) and may account for the presence of (A+T)-rich DNA upstream of many prokaryotic promoters. Since the same alpha mutations also block activation by some transcription factors, mechanisms of promoter stimulation by upstream DNA elements and positive control by certain transcription factors may be related.

Protein-protein communication within the transcription apparatus

Images