A carboxy-terminal deletion impairs the assembly of GroEL and confers a pleiotropic phenotype in Escherichia coli K-12

Structural basis of substrate progression through the bacterial chaperonin cycle

The bacterial chaperonin GroEL-GroES promotes protein folding through ATP-regulated cycles of substrate protein binding, encapsulation, and release. Here, we have used cryoEM to determine structures of GroEL, GroEL-ADP·BeF3, and GroEL-ADP·AlF3-GroES all complexed with the model substrate Rubisco. Our structures provide a series of snapshots that show how the conformation and interactions of non-native Rubisco change as it proceeds through the GroEL-GroES reaction cycle. We observe specific charged and hydrophobic GroEL residues forming strong initial contacts with non-native Rubisco. Binding of ATP or ADP·BeF3 to GroEL-Rubisco results in the formation of an intermediate GroEL complex displaying striking asymmetry in the ATP/ADP·BeF3-bound ring. In this ring, four GroEL subunits bind Rubisco and the other three are in the GroES-accepting conformation, suggesting how GroEL can recruit GroES without releasing bound substrate. Our cryoEM structures of stalled GroEL-ADP·AlF3-Rubisco-GroES complexes show Rubisco folding intermediates interacting with GroEL-GroES via different sets of residues.

Crystal structure of P. falciparum Cpn60 bound to ATP reveals an open dynamic conformation before substrate binding

Plasmodium falciparum harbors group 1 and group 2 chaperonin systems to mediate the folding of cellular proteins in different cellular locations. Two distinct group 1 chaperonins operate in the organelles of mitochondria and apicoplasts, while group 2 chaperonins function in the cytosol. No structural information has been reported for any chaperonin from plasmodium. In this study, we describe the crystal structure of a double heptameric ring Plasmodium falciparum mitochondrial chaperonin 60 (Cpn60) bound with ATP, which differs significantly from any known crystal structure of chaperonin 60. The structure likely represents a unique intermediate state during conformational conversion from the closed state to the opened state. Three of the seven apical domains are highly dynamic while the equatorial domains form a stable ring. The structure implies large movements of the apical domain in the solution play a role in nucleotide-dependent regulation of substrate binding and folding. A unique 26–27 residue insertion in the equatorial domain of Plasmodium falciparum mitochondrial chaperonin greatly increases both inter-ring and intra-ring subunit–subunit interactions. The present structure provides new insights into the mechanism of Cpn60 in chaperonin assembly and function.

Chaperonin-assisted protein folding: a chronologue

This chronologue seeks to document the discovery and development of an understanding of oligomeric ring protein assemblies known as chaperonins that assist protein folding in the cell. It provides detail regarding genetic, physiologic, biochemical, and biophysical studies of these ATP-utilizing machines from both in vivo and in vitro observations. The chronologue is organized into various topics of physiology and mechanism, for each of which a chronologic order is generally followed. The text is liberally illustrated to provide firsthand inspection of the key pieces of experimental data that propelled this field. Because of the length and depth of this piece, the use of the outline as a guide for selected reading is encouraged, but it should also be of help in pursuing the text in direct order.

GroEL actively stimulates folding of the endogenous substrate protein PepQ

Many essential proteins cannot fold without help from chaperonins, like the GroELS system of Escherichia coli. How chaperonins accelerate protein folding remains controversial. Here we test key predictions of both passive and active models of GroELS-stimulated folding, using the endogenous E. coli metalloprotease PepQ. While GroELS increases the folding rate of PepQ by over 15-fold, we demonstrate that slow spontaneous folding of PepQ is not caused by aggregation. Fluorescence measurements suggest that, when folding inside the GroEL-GroES cavity, PepQ populates conformations not observed during spontaneous folding in free solution. Using cryo-electron microscopy, we show that the GroEL C-termini make physical contact with the PepQ folding intermediate and help retain it deep within the GroEL cavity, resulting in reduced compactness of the PepQ monomer. Our findings strongly support an active model of chaperonin-mediated protein folding, where partial unfolding of misfolded intermediates plays a key role.

In the prevailing model for assisted protein folding, chaperonins act passively by preventing protein aggregation. Here, the authors use single-molecule fluorescence measurements and cryo-electron microscopy and show that the E. coli GroELS chaperonin system also has an active role in folding the endogenous bacterial protein PepQ.

Effects of C-terminal Truncation of Chaperonin GroEL on the Yield of In-cage Folding of the Green Fluorescent Protein

Chaperonin GroEL from Escherichia coli consists of two heptameric rings stacked back-to-back to form a cagelike structure. It assists in the folding of substrate proteins in concert with the co-chaperonin GroES by incorporating them into its large cavity. The mechanism underlying the incorporation of substrate proteins currently remains unclear. The flexible C-terminal residues of GroEL, which are invisible in the x-ray crystal structure, have recently been suggested to play a key role in the efficient encapsulation of substrates. These C-terminal regions have also been suggested to separate the double rings of GroEL at the bottom of the cavity. To elucidate the role of the C-terminal regions of GroEL on the efficient encapsulation of substrate proteins, we herein investigated the effects of C-terminal truncation on GroE-mediated folding using the green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a substrate. We demonstrated that the yield of in-cage folding mediated by a single ring GroEL (SR1) was markedly decreased by truncation, whereas that mediated by a double ring football-shaped complex was not affected. These results suggest that the C-terminal region of GroEL functions as a barrier between rings, preventing the leakage of GFP through the bottom space of the cage. We also found that once GFP folded into its native conformation within the cavity of SR1 it never escaped even in the absence of the C-terminal tails. This suggests that GFP molecules escaped through the pore only when they adopted a denatured conformation. Therefore, the folding and escape of GFP from C-terminally truncated SR1·GroES appeared to be competing with each other.

The dynamic conformational cycle of the group I chaperonin C-termini revealed via molecular dynamics simulation

Chaperonins are large ring shaped oligomers that facilitate protein folding by encapsulation within a central cavity. All chaperonins possess flexible C-termini which protrude from the equatorial domain of each subunit into the central cavity. Biochemical evidence suggests that the termini play an important role in the allosteric regulation of the ATPase cycle, in substrate folding and in complex assembly and stability. Despite the tremendous wealth of structural data available for numerous orthologous chaperonins, little structural information is available regarding the residues within the C-terminus. Herein, molecular dynamics simulations are presented which localize the termini throughout the nucleotide cycle of the group I chaperonin, GroE, from Escherichia coli. The simulation results predict that the termini undergo a heretofore unappreciated conformational cycle which is coupled to the nucleotide state of the enzyme. As such, these results have profound implications for the mechanism by which GroE utilizes nucleotide and folds client proteins.

The C-terminal tails of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL stimulate protein folding by directly altering the conformation of a substrate protein

Many essential cellular proteins fold only with the assistance of chaperonin machines like the GroEL-GroES system of Escherichia coli. However, the mechanistic details of assisted protein folding by GroEL-GroES remain the subject of ongoing debate. We previously demonstrated that GroEL-GroES enhances the productive folding of a kinetically trapped substrate protein through unfolding, where both binding energy and the energy of ATP hydrolysis are used to disrupt the inhibitory misfolded states. Here, we show that the intrinsically disordered yet highly conserved C-terminal sequence of the GroEL subunits directly contributes to substrate protein unfolding. Interactions between the C terminus and the non-native substrate protein alter the binding position of the substrate protein on the GroEL apical surface. The C-terminal tails also impact the conformational state of the substrate protein during capture and encapsulation on the GroEL ring. Importantly, removal of the C termini results in slower overall folding, reducing the fraction of the substrate protein that commits quickly to a productive folding pathway and slowing several kinetically distinct folding transitions that occur inside the GroEL-GroES cavity. The conserved C-terminal tails of GroEL are thus important for protein folding from the beginning to the end of the chaperonin reaction cycle.

Chaperone networking facilitates protein targeting to the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane

Nascent polypeptides emerging from the ribosome are assisted by a pool of molecular chaperones and targeting factors, which enable them to efficiently partition as cytosolic, integral membrane or exported proteins. Extensive genetic and biochemical analyses have significantly expanded our knowledge of chaperone tasking throughout this process. In bacteria, it is known that the folding of newly-synthesized cytosolic proteins is mainly orchestrated by three highly conserved molecular chaperones, namely Trigger Factor (TF), DnaK (HSP70) and GroEL (HSP60). Yet, it has been reported that these major chaperones are strongly involved in protein translocation pathways as well. This review describes such essential molecular chaperone functions, with emphasis on both the biogenesis of inner membrane proteins and the post-translational targeting of presecretory proteins to the Sec and the twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathways. Critical interplay between TF, DnaK, GroEL and other molecular chaperones and targeting factors, including SecB, SecA, the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the redox enzyme maturation proteins (REMPs) is also discussed. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein trafficking and secretion in bacteria. Guest Editors: Anastassios Economou and Ross Dalbey.

Molecular functions of chaperonin gene, containing tailless complex polypeptide 1 from Macrobrachium rosenbergii

Chaperonin (MrChap) was identified from a constructed transcriptome dataset of freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. The MrChap peptide contains a long chaperone super family domain between 11 and 525. Three chaperone tailless complex polypeptide (TCP-1) signatures are present in the MrChap peptide sequence at 36-48, 57-73 and 85-93. The gene expressions of MrChap in both healthy M. rosenbergii and those infected with infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHHNV) were examined using qRT-PCR. To understand its biological activity, the recombinant MrChap gene was constructed and expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). The results of ATPase assay showed that the recombinant MrChap protein exhibited apparent ATPase activity. Chaperone activity assay showed that the recombinant MrChap protein is an active chaperone. These results suggest that MrChap is potentially involved in the immune responses against viral infection in M. rosenbergii. These findings indicate that the recombinant MrChap protein may be used in immunotherapeutic approaches.

Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: using a central cavity to kinetically assist polypeptide chain folding

The chaperonin ring assembly GroEL provides kinetic assistance to protein folding in the cell by binding non-native protein in the hydrophobic central cavity of an open ring and subsequently, upon binding ATP and the co-chaperonin GroES to the same ring, releasing polypeptide into a now hydrophilic encapsulated cavity where productive folding occurs in isolation. The fate of polypeptide during binding, encapsulation, and folding in the chamber has been the subject of recent experimental studies and is reviewed and considered here. We conclude that GroEL, in general, behaves passively with respect to its substrate proteins during these steps. While binding appears to be able to rescue non-native polypeptides from kinetic traps, such rescue is most likely exerted at the level of maximizing hydrophobic contact, effecting alteration of the topology of weakly structured states. Encapsulation does not appear to involve 'forced unfolding', and if anything, polypeptide topology is compacted during this step. Finally, chamber-mediated folding appears to resemble folding in solution, except that major kinetic complications of multimolecular association are prevented.

Effect of the C-terminal truncation on the functional cycle of chaperonin GroEL: implication that the C-terminal region facilitates the transition from the folding-arrested to the folding-competent state

To elucidate the exact role of the C-terminal region of GroEL in its functional cycle, the C-terminal 20-amino acid truncated mutant of GroEL was constructed. The steady-state ATPase rate and duration of GroES binding showed that the functional cycle of the truncated GroEL is extended by approximately 2 s in comparison with that of the wild type, without interfering with the basic functions of GroEL. We have proposed a model for the functional cycle of GroEL, which consists of two rate-limiting steps of approximately 3- and approximately 5-s duration (Ueno, T., Taguchi, H., Tadakuma, H., Yoshida, M., and Funatsu, T. (2004) Mol. Cell 14, 423-434 g). According to the model, detailed kinetic studies were performed. We found that a 20-residue truncation of the C terminus extends the time until inorganic phosphate is generated and the time for arresting protein folding in the central cavity, i.e. the lifetime of the first rate-limiting step in the functional cycle, to an approximately 5-s duration. These results suggest that the integrity of the C-terminal region facilitates the transition from the first to the second rate-limiting state.

Homologous cpn60 genes in Rhizobium leguminosarum are not functionally equivalent

Many bacteria possess 2 or more genes for the chaperonin GroEL and the cochaperonin GroES. In particular, rhizobial species often have multiple groEL and groES genes, with a high degree of amino-acid similarity, in their genomes. The Rhizobium leguminosarum strain A34 has 3 complete groE operons, which we have named cpn.1, cpn.2 and cpn.3. Previously we have shown the cpn. 1 operon to be essential for growth, but the two other cpn operons to be dispensable. Here, we have investigated the extent to which loss of the essential GroEL homologue Cpn60.1 can be compensated for by expression of the other two GroEL homologues (Cnp60.2 and Cpn60.3). Cpn60.2 could not be overexpressed to high levels in R. leguminosarum, and was unable to replace Cpn60.1. A strain that overexpressed Cpn60.3 grew in the absence of Cpn60.1, but the complemented strain displayed a temperature-sensitive phenotype. Cpn60.1 and Cpn60.3, when coexpressed in Escherichia coli, preferentially selfassembled rather than forming mixed heteroligomers. We conclude that, despite their high amino acid similarity, the GroEL homologues of R. leguminosarum are not functionally equivalent in vivo.

Temperature-regulated formation of mycelial mat-like biofilms by Legionella pneumophila

Fifty strains representing 38 species of the genus Legionella were examined for biofilm formation on glass, polystyrene, and polypropylene surfaces in static cultures at 25 degrees C, 37 degrees C, and 42 degrees C. Strains of Legionella pneumophila, the most common causative agent of Legionnaires' disease, were found to have the highest ability to form biofilms among the test strains. The quantity, rate of formation, and adherence stability of L. pneumophila biofilms showed considerable dependence on both temperature and surface material. Glass and polystyrene surfaces gave between two- to sevenfold-higher yields of biofilms at 37 degrees C or 42 degrees C than at 25 degrees C; conversely, polypropylene surface had between 2 to 16 times higher yields at 25 degrees C than at 37 degrees C or 42 degrees C. On glass surfaces, the biofilms were formed faster but attached less stably at 37 degrees C or 42 degrees C than at 25 degrees C. Both scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed that biofilms formed at 37 degrees C or 42 degrees C were mycelial mat like and were composed of filamentous cells, while at 25 degrees C, cells were rod shaped. Planktonic cells outside of biofilms or in shaken liquid cultures were rod shaped. Notably, the filamentous cells were found to be multinucleate and lacking septa, but a recA null mutant of L. pneumophila was unaffected in its temperature-regulated filamentation within biofilms. Our data also showed that filamentous cells were able to rapidly give rise to a large number of short rods in a fresh liquid culture at 37 degrees C. The possibility of this biofilm to represent a novel strategy by L. pneumophila to compete for proliferation among the environmental microbiota is discussed.

A nonconserved carboxy-terminal segment of GroEL contributes to reaction temperature

The role of the C-terminal segment of the GroEL equatorial domain was analyzed. To understand the molecular basis for the different active temperatures of GroEL from three bacteria, we constructed a series of chimeric GroELs combining the C-terminal segment of the equatorial domain from one species with the remainder of GroEL from another. In each case, the foreign C-terminal segment substantially altered the active temperature range of the chimera. Substitution of L524 of Escherichia coli GroEL with the corresponding residue (isoleucine) from psychrophilic GroEL resulted in a GroE with approximately wild-type activity at 25 degrees C, but also at 10 degrees C, a temperature at which wild-type E. coli GroE is inactive. In a detailed look at the temperature dependence of the GroELs, normal E. coli GroEL and the L524I mutant became highly active above 14 degrees C and 12 degrees C respectively. Similar temperature dependences were observed in a surface plasmon resonance assay of GroES binding. These results suggested that the C-terminal segment of the GroEL equatorial domain has an important role in the temperature dependence of GroEL. Moreover, E. coli acquired the ability to grow at low temperature through the introduction of cold-adapted chimeric or L524I mutant groEL genes.

Isolation and characterisation of mutants of GroEL that are fully functional as single rings

A key aspect of the reaction mechanism for the molecular chaperone GroEL is the transmission of an allosteric signal between the two rings of the GroEL complex. Thus, the single-ring mutant SR1 is unable to act as a chaperone as it cannot release bound substrate or GroES. We used a simple selection procedure to identify mutants of SR1 that restored chaperone activity in vivo. A large number of single amino acid changes, mapping at diverse positions throughout the protein, enabled SR1 to regain its ability to act as a chaperone while remaining as a single ring. In vivo assays were used to identify the proteins that had regained maximal activity. In some cases, no difference could be detected between strains expressing wild-type GroEL and those expressing the mutated proteins. Three of the most active proteins where the mutations were in distinct parts of the protein were purified to homogeneity and characterised in vitro. All were capable of acting efficiently as chaperones for two different GroES-dependent substrates. All three proteins bound nucleotide as effectively as did GroEL, but the binding of GroES in the presence of ATP or ADP was reduced significantly relative to the wild-type. These active single rings should provide a useful tool for studying the nature of the allosteric changes that occur in the GroEL reaction cycle.

Insertion mutagenesis of Escherichiacoli GroEL

To gain insights into the in vivo folding and assembly of bacterial chaperonins, groEL was subjected to insertion mutagenesis using transposon ISlacZ/in. Four GroEL-LacZ fusions and the corresponding insertion mutants were obtained after residues 34, 90, 291, and 367. Apical domain insertion mutants GroEL291 and GroEL367 were degraded into monomeric 30- and 40-kDa fragments, respectively. Only the latter was fully soluble, suggesting that proper isomerization of an essentially complete apical domain is required for efficient protomer folding. Truncated variants were inactive as minichaperones as they failed to restore the growth of groEL140 cells at 43 degrees C whether or not GroES was co-expressed. A 31-residue insertion in equatorial helix D led to complete degradation of GroEL90. By contrast, extraneous amino acids were tolerated at equatorial position 34, indicating that this region is highly flexible. Nevertheless, GroEL34 did not fold as efficiently as authentic GroEL and reached only a heptameric conformation.

Properties of the chaperonin complex from the halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii

The halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii has three genes encoding type II chaperonins, named cct1, cct2 and cct3. We show here that the three CCT proteins are all expressed but not to the same level. All three proteins are further induced on heat shock. The CCT proteins were purified by ammonium sulphate precipitation, sucrose gradient centrifugation and hydrophobic interaction chromatography. This procedure yields a high molecular mass complex (or complexes). The complex has ATPase activity, which is magnesium dependent, low salt-sensitive and stable to at least 75 degrees C. Activity requires high levels of potassium ions and was reduced in the presence of an increasing concentration of sodium ions.

The effect of C-terminal mutations of HSP60 on protein folding

HSP60 is an essential gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The protein forms homotetradecameric double toroid complexes. The flexible C-terminal end of each subunit, which is hydrophobic in nature, protrudes inside the central cavity where protein folding occurs. In order to study the functional role of the C-terminus of Hsp60, we generated and characterized yeast strains expressing mutants of Hsp60 proteins. Most of the yeast strains expressing Hsp60 with C-terminal deletions grew normally, unless the deletion impaired the interaction between neighboring subunits. The cells carrying Hsp60 mutants with an epitope of influenza hemagglutinin (HA) and T7 alone in the C-terminal region grew normally, but the mutant containing both HA and T7 was unable to grow in nonfermentable carbon sources. In vitro biochemical assays were performed using purified Hsp60 proteins. All the mutants examined remained capable of interacting with Hsp10 in a nucleotide-dependent manner. However, binding and/or refolding of denatured rhodanese became defective in most of the hsp60 mutants. Therefore, the hydrophobic C-terminal tail of Hsp60 plays an important role in the refolding of protein substrates, although it is flexible in structure.

Assembly of chaperonin complexes

Chaperonins are a subclass of molecular chaperones that assist both the folding of newly synthesized proteins and the maintenance of proteins in a folded state during periods of stress. The best studied members of this family are the type I chaperonins, occurring in bacteria and evolutionarily derived organelles. Type II chaperonins occur in archaea and the eukaryotic cytosol. An intriguing question pertains to the mechanism by which chaperonins themselves are folded and assembled into functional oligomers. The available evidence for the assembly/disassembly of type I and II chaperonins points to a process that is highly cooperative and suggests a prominent role for nucleotides. Interestingly, the intracellular assembly of type I chaperonins appears to be a chaperone-dependent process itself and requires functional preformed chaperonin complexes.

Human hepatitis B virus polymerase interacts with the molecular chaperonin Hsp60

Previous studies showed that hepatitis B virus polymerase (HBV Pol) interacts with host factors such as the Hsp90 complex, which is a critical step in viral genome replication. In this report, we propose that another chaperone, Hsp60, interacts with human HBV Pol and that this is a very important step for maturation of human HBV Pol into the active state. In the immunoprecipitation of recombinant human HBV Pol expressed in insect cells with the recombinant baculovirus expression system, the 60-kDa protein was coimmunoprecipitated with Pol and the protein was identified as Hsp60 through peptide sequencing and immunogenic analysis with an anti-Hsp60 antibody. In vitro experiments showed that Hsp60 strongly affected human HBV Pol activity in that (i) blocking of Hsp60 by the protein-specific antibody reduced human HBV Pol activity, (ii) the activity was increased by addition of Hsp60 in the presence of ATP, and (iii) ATP synergistically activated human HBV Pol with Hsp60. In vivo experiments showed that inhibition of Hsp60 in cells by a mutant Hsp60, C Delta 540, resulted in the reduction of human HBV Pol activity. In summary, our results indicate that the interaction is significant for conversion of human HBV Pol into the active state.

Excluded volume effects on the refolding and assembly of an oligomeric protein. GroEL, a case study

We have studied the effect of macromolecular crowding reagents, such as polysaccharides and bovine serum albumin, on the refolding of tetradecameric GroEL from urea-denatured protein monomers. The results show that productive refolding and assembly strongly depends on the presence of nucleotides (ATP or ADP) and background macromolecules. Nucleotides are required to generate an assembly-competent monomeric conformation, suggesting that proper folding of the equatorial domain of the protein subunits into a native-like structure is essential for productive assembly. Crowding modulates GroEL oligomerization in two different ways. First, it increases the tendency of refolded, monomeric GroEL to undergo self-association at equilibrium. Second, crowding can modify the relative rates of the two competing self-association reactions, namely, productive assembly into a native tetradecameric structure and unproductive aggregation. This kinetic effect is most likely exerted by modifications of the diffusion coefficient of the refolded monomers, which in turn determine the conformational properties of the interacting subunits. If they are allowed to become assembly-competent before self-association, productive oligomerization occurs; otherwise, unproductive aggregation takes place. Our data demonstrate that the spontaneous refolding and assembly of homo-oligomeric proteins, such as GroEL, can occur efficiently (70%) under crowding conditions similar to those expected in vivo.

Identifying the determinants in the equatorial domain of Buchnera GroEL implicated in binding Potato leafroll virus

Luteoviruses avoid degradation in the hemolymph of their aphid vector by interacting with a GroEL homolog from the aphid's primary endosymbiotic bacterium (Buchnera sp.). Mutational analysis of GroEL from the primary endosymbiont of Myzus persicae (MpB GroEL) revealed that the amino acids mediating binding of Potato leafroll virus (PLRV; Luteoviridae) are located within residues 9 to 19 and 427 to 457 of the N-terminal and C-terminal regions, respectively, of the discontinuous equatorial domain. Virus overlay assays with a series of overlapping synthetic decameric peptides and their derivatives demonstrated that R13, K15, L17, and R18 of the N-terminal region and R441 and R445 of the C-terminal region of the equatorial domain of GroEL are critical for PLRV binding. Replacement of R441 and R445 by alanine in full-length MpB GroEL and in MpB GroEL deletion mutants reduced but did not abolish PLRV binding. Alanine substitution of either R13 or K15 eliminated the PLRV-binding capacity of the other and those of L17 and R18. In the predicted tertiary structure of GroEL, the determinants mediating virus binding are juxtaposed in the equatorial plain.

Multivalent binding of nonnative substrate proteins by the chaperonin GroEL

The chaperonin GroEL binds nonnative substrate protein in the central cavity of an open ring through exposed hydrophobic residues at the inside aspect of the apical domains and then mediates productive folding upon binding ATP and the cochaperonin GroES. Whether nonnative proteins bind to more than one of the seven apical domains of a GroEL ring is unknown. We have addressed this using rings with various combinations of wild-type and binding-defective mutant apical domains, enabled by their production as single polypeptides. A wild-type extent of binary complex formation with two stringent substrate proteins, malate dehydrogenase or Rubisco, required a minimum of three consecutive binding-proficient apical domains. Rhodanese, a less-stringent substrate, required only two wild-type domains and was insensitive to their arrangement. As a physical correlate, multivalent binding of Rubisco was directly observed in an oxidative cross-linking experiment.

Conservation among HSP60 sequences in relation to structure, function, and evolution

The chaperonin HSP60 (GroEL) proteins are essential in eubacterial genomes and in eukaryotic organelles. Functional regions inferred from mutation studies and the Escherichia coli GroEL 3D crystal complexes are evaluated in a multiple alignment across 43 diverse HSP60 sequences, centering on ATP/ADP and Mg2+ binding sites, on residues interacting with substrate, on GroES contact positions, on interface regions between monomers and domains, and on residues important in allosteric conformational changes. The most evolutionary conserved residues relate to the ATP/ADP and Mg2+ binding sites. Hydrophobic residues that contribute in substrate binding are also significantly conserved. A large number of charged residues line the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES complex in the substrate-releasing conformation. These span statistically significant intra- and inter-monomer three-dimensional (3D) charge clusters that are highly conserved among sequences and presumably play an important role interacting with the substrate. Unaligned short segments between blocks of alignment are generally exposed at the outside wall of the Anfinsen cage complex. The multiple alignment reveals regions of divergence common to specific evolutionary groups. For example, rickettsial sequences diverge in the ATP/ADP binding domain and gram-positive sequences diverge in the allosteric transition domain. The evolutionary information of the multiple alignment proffers attractive sites for mutational studies.

Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12, edition 10: the traditional map

This map is an update of the edition 9 map by Berlyn et al. (M. K. B. Berlyn, K. B. Low, and K. E. Rudd, p. 1715-1902, in F. C. Neidhardt et al., ed., Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology, 2nd ed., vol. 2, 1996). It uses coordinates established by the completed sequence, expressed as 100 minutes for the entire circular map, and adds new genes discovered and established since 1996 and eliminates those shown to correspond to other known genes. The latter are included as synonyms. An alphabetical list of genes showing map location, synonyms, the protein or RNA product of the gene, phenotypes of mutants, and reference citations is provided. In addition to genes known to correspond to gene sequences, other genes, often older, that are described by phenotype and older mapping techniques and that have not been correlated with sequences are included.

The CIRCE element and its putative repressor control cell cycle expression of the Caulobacter crescentus groESL operon

The groESL operon is under complex regulation in Caulobacter crescentus. In addition to strong induction after exposure to heat shock, under physiological growth conditions, its expression is subject to cell cycle control. Transcription and translation of the groE genes occur primarily in predivisional cells, with very low levels of expression in stalked cells. The regulatory region of groESL contains both a sigma32-like promoter and a CIRCE element. Overexpression of C. crescentus sigma32 gives rise to higher levels of GroEL and increased levels of the groESL transcript coming from the sigma32-like promoter. Site-directed mutagenesis in CIRCE has indicated a negative role for this cis-acting element in the expression of groESL only at normal growth temperatures, with a minor effect on heat shock induction. Furthermore, groESL-lacZ transcription fusions carrying mutations in CIRCE are no longer cell cycle regulated. Analysis of an hrcA null strain, carrying a disruption in the gene encoding the putative repressor that binds to the CIRCE element, shows constitutive synthesis of GroEL throughout the Caulobacter cell cycle. These results indicate a negative role for the hrcA gene product and the CIRCE element in the temporal control of the groESL operon.

Potato leafroll virus binds to the equatorial domain of the aphid endosymbiotic GroEL homolog

A GroEL homolog with a molecular mass of 60 kDa, produced by the primary endosymbiotic bacterium (a Buchnera sp.) of Myzus persicae and released into the hemolymph, has previously been shown to be a key protein in the transmission of potato leafroll virus (PLRV). Like other luteoviruses and pea enation mosaic virus, PLRV readily binds to extracellular Buchnera GroEL, and in vivo interference in this interaction coincides with reduced capsid integrity and loss of infectivity. To gain more knowledge of the nature of the association between PLRV and Buchnera GroEL, the groE operon of the primary endosymbiont of M. persicae (MpB groE) and its flanking sequences were characterized and the PLRV-binding domain of Buchnera GroEL was identified by deletion mutant analysis. MpB GroEL has extensive sequence similarity (92%) with Escherichia coli GroEL and other members of the chaperonin-60 family. The genomic organization of the Buchnera groE operon is similar to that of the groE operon of E. coli except that a constitutive promoter sequence could not be identified; only the heat shock promoter was present. By a virus overlay assay of protein blots, it was shown that purified PLRV bound as efficiently to recombinant MpB GroEL (expressed in E. coli) as it did to wild-type MpB GroEL. Mutational analysis of the gene encoding MpB GroEL revealed that the PLRV-binding site was located in the so-called equatorial domain and not in the apical domain which is generally involved in polypeptide binding and folding. Buchnera GroEL mutants lacking the entire equatorial domain or parts of it lost the ability to bind PLRV. The equatorial domain is made up of two regions at the N and C termini that are not contiguous in the amino acid sequence but are in spatial proximity after folding of the GroEL polypeptide. Both the N- and C-terminal regions of the equatorial domain were implicated in virus binding.

Structural changes of the Escherichia coli GroEL-GroES chaperonins upon complex formation in solution: a neutron small angle scattering study

We applied neutron scattering in conjunction with deuterium (D-) labeling in order to obtain information about the domain structure of GroEL and GroES isolated and in the complex. Each subunit of the heptameric GroES consists of two domains, a core domain (Met1 to Lys15 and Lys34 to Ala97) and an intervening loop region (Glu16 to Ala33). Neutron scattering shows that both regions change their conformation upon GroEL/GroES complex formation. The interdomain angle between the core regions of the heptameric GroES increases from 120 to 140 degrees, leading to a less dome-like shape of GroES, and the loop regions turn inwards by 75 degrees. The 23 C-terminal amino acids of the 14 GroEL subunits (Lys526 to Met548), which are unresolved in the crystal structure, are located either at the bottom of the cavity formed by the seven-membered GroEL ring or at the inner wall of the cavity. Upon complex formation the apical domains of GroEL move outwards, which facilitates binding of GroES at a Gro-EL-GroES center-to-center distance of (87 +/- 8) A. These structural changes may be important for the dissociation of the unfolded protein bound to the central cavity upon GroES binding. The overall structure determined by neutron scattering in solution tallies with the crystallographic model published after completion of this study. Differences in the conformation of GroES observed in the complex by the two methods support the view that the chaperonin complex is a flexible molecule which might switch in solution between different conformations.

Structural and functional characterization of homo-oligomeric complexes of alpha and beta chaperonin subunits from the hyperthermophilic archaeum Thermococcus strain KS-1

To elucidate the function of group II chaperonin, the gene for the chaperonin from the hyperthermophilic archaeum Thermococcus strain KS-1 was cloned and sequenced. Two distinct genes coding for chaperonin subunits, designated alpha and beta, were obtained, and their deduced amino acid sequences are highly homologous to those of group II chaperonins from other sources. The alpha and beta subunits were individually expressed in Escherichia coli. Both of the recombinant subunits assemble to constitute the homo-oligomeric double-ring complexes, which are prone to form large aggregates. The alpha aggregate is dissociated into the typical chaperonin ring complex by incubation in buffer containing 15% (v/v) methanol, while the beta aggregate cannot be dissociated. At high temperature, both of the recombinant complexes have weak ATPase activities. They are able to arrest refolding of a chemically denatured thermophilic enzyme in the absence of ATP, and refolding is resumed when ATP is supplemented. These results suggest that homo-oligomeric complexes of the archaeal chaperonin have activity.

Solution structures of GroEL and its complex with rhodanese from small-angle neutron scattering

BACKGROUND

Molecular chaperonins 60 are cylindrical oligomeric complexes which bind to unfolded proteins and assist in their folding. Studies to identify the location of the protein substrate have produced contradictory results: some suggest that the substrate-binding site is buried within the interior of the complex, whereas others indicate an external (polar) location.

RESULTS

Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) measurements were made on GroEL chaperonin and on a complex of GroEL with rhodanese. The radius of gyration and the molecular weight determined from SANS measurements of GroEL agree well with those from its crystal structure. The positions of residues which were unresolved in the crystal structure have been confirmed. In addition, through model fitting of the SANS data, conformational changes in solution have been assessed and the location of bound rhodanese has been determined.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall structure of GroEL in solution is similar to the crystal structure. In GroEL the N-terminal and C-terminal residues are organized compactly near the equator of the cylinder and the apical domains are flared by about 5 degrees. The best fit of SANS data suggests the existence of an equilibrium between the complex and single rings and monomers. SANS data for the GroEL-rhodanese complex are consistent with a model wherein one rhodanese molecule binds across the opening to the chaperonin cavity, rather than within it.

A monomeric variant of GroEL binds nucleotides but is inactive as a molecular chaperone

The heat shock protein GroEL from Escherichia coli is a tetradecameric oligomer that facilitates the refolding of nonnative polypeptides in an ATP-hydrolysis dependent reaction. A mutant in GroEL was prepared in which lysine 3 was substituted with glutamate, which destabilizes the oligomeric structure of GroEL (Horovitz, A., Bochkareva, E.S., and Girshovich, A.S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9957-9959). The highly expressed and purified GroELK3E was judged to be monomeric by sedimentation equilibrium, yielding a molecular weight of 54,500, despite a weak tendency of the mutant to reversibly form higher order aggregates above 4 mg ml-1. The monomeric variant appears to be folded based on the far UV circular dichroism spectrum, which shows significant alpha-helical content, but with slight differences in conformation relative to wild-type GroEL. The increase in exposed hydrophobic surface of the monomer was probed with the dye 4,4'-bis-1-anilino-3-naphthalenesulfonate (bis-ANS). The fluorescence of bis-ANS increases approximately 150-fold in the presence of the mutant, and about 4 mol of bis-ANS bind per mol of monomer, with a binding constant of 1.6 microM. Adenosine nucleotide binding to monomeric GroELK3E resulted in considerable quenching of bis-ANS fluorescence, correlating with significant structural changes as seen in the far UV circular dichroism, and permitted the measurement of binding isotherms for ATP and ADP. Hyperbolic ATP binding isotherms yield a dissociation constant of 82 microM, about 4-fold weaker than the K0.5 for ATP seen in steady-state kinetics assays of the wild-type GroEL ATPase.A similar difference was seen for ADP binding. These results suggest that the mutation disrupts the native tetradecameric quaternary structure through conformational changes that may also weaken nucleotide binding. The monomeric mutant exhibited no chaperone activity as evidenced by a filure to inhibit or facilitate the refolding of chemically denatured enolase, an inability to refold denatured rhodanese above spontaneous levels, and a lack of binding to alpha-casein, a competitor in many chaperonin-promoted refolding reactions. Thus, the formation of assembly incompetent monomers by the lysine 3 to glutamate mutation results in a dramatic decrease in the affinity for nonnative polypeptide chains and suggests that the oligomeric nature of GroEL is crucial for its molecular chaperone function.