Mutagenesis of the P2 promoter of the major outer membrane protein gene of Chlamydia trachomatis

Diversity of σ66-Specific Promoters Contributes to Regulation of Developmental Gene Expression in Chlamydia trachomatis

Promoter recognition by the RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme is a key step in gene regulation. In Chlamydia trachomatis, a medically important obligate intracellular bacterium, σ⁶⁶ allows the RNAP to initiate promoter-specific transcription throughout the chlamydial developmental cycle. Here, we investigated the intrinsic properties of σ⁶⁶-specific promoters with emphasis on their role in the developmental gene expression of C. trachomatis. First, we examined whether promoters that contain a 5'-T(-15)G(-14)-3' (TG) motif upstream from the -10 element appear more often than others in genes that are preferentially expressed during the early, middle, or late stages of the C. trachomatis developmental cycle. We then determined the critical genetic elements that are required for transcription initiation in vitro. We also assessed the activity of promoters in the presence of Scc4, which can directly interact with σ⁶⁶RNAP. Finally, we evaluated the promoter-specific dynamics during C. trachomatis infection using a reporter assay. These results reveal that the TG motif is an important determinant in certain early or late promoters. The TG promoters that have the -35 element are recognized by σ⁶⁶RNAP and Scc4 differently from those lacking the -35 element. Based on these properties, the σ⁶⁶-specific promoters can fall into three classes. Architectural diversity, behavioral plasticity, and the specific interplays between promoters and the σ⁶⁶RNAP likely contribute to developmental gene transcription in C. trachomatis. IMPORTANCE Meticulous promoter elucidation is required to understand the foundations of transcription initiation. However, knowledge of promoter-specific transcription remains limited in C. trachomatis. This work underscores the structural and functional plasticity of σ⁶⁶-specific promoters that are regulated by σ⁶⁶RNAP, as well as their importance in the developmental gene regulation of C. trachomatis.

Quantifying promoter activity during the developmental cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis

Chlamydia trachomatis is an important human pathogen that undergoes a characteristic development cycle correlating with stage-specific gene expression profiles. Taking advantage of recent developments in the genetic transformation in C. trachomatis, we constructed a versatile green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter system to study the development-dependent function of C. trachomatis promoters in an attempt to elucidate the mechanism that controls C. trachomatis adaptability. We validated the use of the GFP reporter system by visualizing the activity of an early euo gene promoter. Additionally, we uncovered a new ompA promoter, which we named P3, utilizing the GFP reporter system combined with 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), in vitro transcription assays, real-time quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR), and flow cytometry. Mutagenesis of the P3 region verifies that P3 is a new class of C. trachomatis σ(66)-dependent promoter, which requires an extended -10 TGn motif for transcription. These results corroborate complex developmentally controlled ompA expression in C. trachomatis. The exploitation of genetically labeled C. trachomatis organisms with P3-driven GFP allows for the observation of changes in ompA expression in response to developmental signals. The results of this study could be used to complement previous findings and to advance understanding of C. trachomatis genetic expression.

The early gene product EUO is a transcriptional repressor that selectively regulates promoters of Chlamydia late genes

The obligate intracellular bacterium Chlamydia has an unusual developmental cycle in which there is conversion between two forms that are specialized for either intracellular replication or propagation of the infection to a new host cell. Expression of late chlamydial genes is upregulated during conversion from the replicating to the infectious form, but the mechanism for this temporal regulation is unknown. We found that EUO, which is expressed from an early gene, binds to two sites upstream of the late operon omcAB, but only the downstream site was necessary for transcriptional repression. Using gel shift and in vitro transcription assays we showed that EUO specifically bound and repressed promoters of Chlamydia trachomatis late genes, but not early or mid genes. These findings support a role for EUO as a temporal repressor that negatively regulates late chlamydial genes and prevents their premature expression. The basis of this specificity is the ability of EUO to selectively bind promoter regions of late genes, which would prevent their transcription by RNA polymerase. Thus, we propose that EUO is a master regulator that prevents the terminal differentiation of the replicating form of chlamydiae into the infectious form until sufficient rounds of replication have occurred.

Phylogenetic comparison of the known Chlamydia trachomatis sigma(66) promoters across to Chlamydia pneumoniae and Chlamydia caviae identifies seven poorly conserved promoters

We used four different phylogenetic footprinting programs and the six chlamydial species with publicly available whole genome sequences to analyze the 12 known sigma(66) promoters of Chlamydia trachomatis that phylogenetically footprinted negative in our previous paper. The analysis showed that 7 of the 12 promoters were poorly conserved across C. trachomatis, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Chlamydia caviae. Interestingly, the associated gene sets for these seven promoters were homologs and the gene orders were well conserved across these three species. Additional phylogenetic footprinting, across different subsets from that used above, of the six publicly available whole chlamydial genome sequences and transcription initiation site mapping of chlamydial promoters was also performed. This analysis showed that two of the seven poorly conserved promoters, the promoters in the upstream regions of C. caviae ltuA and ltuB, were like Escherichia coli sigma(70) promoters. Therefore, these promoters are similar to the promoters of C. trachomatis ltuA and ltuB, as they are sigma(70)-like. Given the fact that 7 out of the 22 known sigma(66) promoters in C. trachomatis are poorly conserved across C. trachomatis, C. pneumoniae and C. caviae, we would like to suggest that many other chlamydial promoters are poorly conserved across these species.

DNA supercoiling-dependent gene regulation in Chlamydia

The intracellular pathogen Chlamydia has an unusual developmental cycle marked by temporal expression patterns whose mechanisms of regulation are largely unknown. To examine if DNA topology can regulate chlamydial gene expression, we tested the in vitro activity of five chlamydial promoters at different superhelical densities. We demonstrated for the first time that individual chlamydial promoters show a differential response to changes in DNA supercoiling that correlates with the temporal expression pattern. The promoters for two midcycle genes, ompA and pgk, were responsive to alterations in supercoiling, and promoter activity could be regulated more than eightfold. In contrast, the promoters for three late transcripts, omcAB, hctA, and ltuB, were relatively insensitive to supercoiling, with promoter activity varying by no more than 2.2-fold over a range of superhelicities. To obtain a measure of how DNA supercoiling levels vary during the chlamydial developmental cycle, we recovered the cryptic chlamydial plasmid at different times after infection and assayed its superhelical density. The chlamydial plasmid was most negatively supercoiled at midcycle, with an approximate superhelical density of -0.07. At early and late times, the plasmid was more relaxed, with an approximate superhelicity of -0.03. Thus, we found a correlation between the responsiveness to supercoiling shown by the two midcycle promoters and the increased level of negative supercoiling during mid time points in the developmental cycle. Our results support a model in which the response of individual promoters to alterations in DNA supercoiling can provide a mechanism for global patterns of temporal gene expression in Chlamydia.

Comparative expression profiling of the Chlamydia trachomatis pmp gene family for clinical and reference strains

BACKGROUND

Chlamydia trachomatis, an obligate intracellular pathogen, is a leading worldwide cause of ocular and urogenital diseases. Advances have been made in our understanding of the nine-member polymorphic membrane protein (Pmp) gene (pmp) family of C. trachomatis. However, there is only limited information on their biologic role, especially for biological variants (biovar) and clinical strains.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We evaluated expression for pmps throughout development for reference strains E/Bour and L2/434, representing different biovars, and for clinical E and L2 strains. Immunoreactivity of patient sera to recombinant (r)Pmps was also determined. All pmps were expressed at two hours. pmpA had the lowest expression but was up-regulated at 12 h for all strains, indicating involvement in reticulate body development. For pmpD, expression peaked at 36 h. Additionally, 57.7% of sera from infected and 0% from uninfected adolescents were reactive to rPmpD (p = 0.001), suggesting a role in immunogenicity. pmpF had the highest expression levels for all clinical strains and L2/434 with differential expression of the pmpFE operon for the same strains. Sera were nonreactive to rPmpF despite immunoreactivity to rMOMP and rPmpD, suggesting that PmpF is not associated with humoral immune responses. pmpFE sequences for clinical strains were identical to those of the respective reference strains. We identified the putative pmpFE promoter, which was, surprisingly, 100% conserved for all strains. Analyses of ribosomal binding sites, RNase E, and hairpin structures suggested complex regulatory mechanism(s) for this >6 Kb operon.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

The dissimilar expression of the same pmp for different C. trachomatis strains may explain different strain-specific needs and phenotypic distinctions. This is further supported by the differential immunoreactivity to rPmpD and rPmpF of sera from patients infected with different strains. Furthermore, clinical E strains did not correlate with the E reference strain at the gene expression level, reinforcing the need for expansive studies of clinical strains.

Chlamydial type III secretion system is encoded on ten operons preceded by sigma 70-like promoter elements

Many gram-negative bacterial pathogens employ type III secretion systems for infectious processes. Chlamydiae are obligate intracellular bacteria that encode a conserved type III secretion system that is likely requisite for growth. Typically, genes encoding type III secretion systems are located in a single locus; however, for chlamydiae these genes are scattered throughout the genome. Little is known regarding the gene regulatory mechanisms for this essential virulence determinant. To facilitate identification of cis-acting transcriptional regulatory elements, the operon structure was determined. This analysis revealed 10 operons that contained 37 genes associated with the type III secretion system. Linkage within these operons suggests a role in type III secretion for each of these genes, including 13 genes encoding proteins with unknown function. The transcriptional start site for each operon was determined. In conjunction with promoter activity assays, this analysis revealed that the type III secretion system operons encode sigma(70)-like promoter elements. Transcriptional initiation by a sigma factor responsible for constitutive gene expression indicates that undefined activators or repressors regulate developmental stage-specific expression of chlamydial type III secretion system genes.

Selective promoter recognition by chlamydial sigma28 holoenzyme

The sigma transcription factor confers the promoter recognition specificity of RNA polymerase (RNAP) in eubacteria. Chlamydia trachomatis has three known sigma factors, sigma(66), sigma(54), and sigma(28). We developed two methods to facilitate the characterization of promoter sequences recognized by C. trachomatis sigma(28) (sigma(28)(Ct)). One involved the arabinose-induced expression of plasmid-encoded sigma(28)(Ct) in a strain of Escherichia coli defective in the sigma(28) structural gene, fliA. The second was an analysis of transcription in vitro with a hybrid holoenzyme reconstituted with E. coli RNAP core and recombinant sigma(28)(Ct). These approaches were used to investigate the interactions of sigma(28)(Ct) with the sigma(28)(Ct)-dependent hctB promoter and selected E. coli sigma(28) (sigma(28)(Ec))-dependent promoters, in parallel, compared with the promoter recognition properties of sigma(28)(EC). Our results indicate that RNAP containing sigma(28)(Ct) has at least three characteristics: (i) it is capable of recognizing some but not all sigma(28)(EC)-dependent promoters; (ii) it can distinguish different promoter structures, preferentially activating promoters with upstream AT-rich sequences; and (iii) it possesses a greater flexibility than sigma(28)(EC) in recognizing variants with different spacing lengths separating the -35 and -10 elements of the core promoter.

Mutational analysis of the Chlamydia trachomatis dnaK promoter defines the optimal -35 promoter element

A long-standing question in the biology of the intracellular bacterium, Chlamydia, has been the structure of the promoter recognized by its RNA polymerase. The 'RNA polymerase sigma subunit paradox' refers to the difficulty reconciling the conservation between the RNA polymerases of Chlamydia and Escherichia coli, especially at the level of the promoter-recognition sigma subunit, with the general lack of homology between chlamydial promoters and the E.coli sigma(70) consensus promoter. While the -10 promoter element appears to be conserved between Chlamydia and E.coli, the structure of the chlamydial -35 promoter element has not been defined. We have investigated the structure of the -35 element of the Chlamydia trachomatis dnaK promoter by measuring the effects of single base pair substitutions on in vitro promoter activity. Most substitutions produced large decreases in promoter activity, which allowed us to define the optimal -35 sequence in the context of the dnaK promoter. We found that the optimal chlamydial -35 promoter sequence is identical to the E.coli sigma(70) consensus -35 promoter element (TTGACA). These results indicate that the optimal promoter specificities of the major form of chlamydial RNA polymerase and E.coli sigma(70) RNA polymerase are in fact highly conserved. A further implication of our results is that many chlamydial promoters have a suboptimal promoter structure. We hypothesize that these chlamydial promoters are intrinsically weak promoters that can be regulated during the chlamydial developmental cycle by additional transcription factors.

Characterization of integration host factor (IHF) binding upstream of the cysteine-rich protein operon (omcAB) promoter of Chlamydia trachomatis LGV serovar L2

Chlamydiae are bacterial parasites that carry out a distinct developmental cycle within host cells; however, the mechanisms by which these organisms regulate stage-specific gene expression are not known. We identified a DNA element located between nucleotide (nt) -135 and -90 upstream from the transcription start point of the late stage-specific CRP operon (omcAB) of Chlamydia trachomatis, to which a protein in extracts of chlamydiae harvested at 23 h after infection binds. A recombinant protein of C. trachomatis open reading frame (ORF) CT267, which is homologous to bacterial integration host factor (IHF) and the heat-unstable nucleoid protein (HU), bound to the same element and produced the same DNase I footprint as the protein in chlamydial extracts. Recombinant ORF CT267 protein bound with high affinity to the DNA element and induced a sharp bend in a DNA fragment containing the binding site, suggesting that ORF CT267 encodes a protein with IHF-like activity, and recombinant protein had a positive effect on in vitro transcription of the CRP operon. IHF-binding activity and IHF protein were detected in extracts of C. trachomatis during the early to intermediate phases of the late stage of the developmental cycle (between 17 and 30 h after infection), but were absent in the extreme late phase of the cycle and in the infectious form of chlamydiae. The presence of an IHF binding site upstream of the CRP operon and the presence of chlamydial IHF-like protein when late stage genes are transcribed suggests that the chlamydial IHF may play a role in stage-specific gene expression.

Identifying regulators of transcription in an obligate intracellular pathogen: a metal-dependent repressor in Chlamydia trachomatis

A prominent feature exhibited by Chlamydia trachomatis growing in an iron-limiting environment is a differential pattern of protein expression. In many bacteria, iron-responsive proteins are regulated at the level of transcription by a family of repressors resembling the Escherichia coli ferric uptake regulator (Fur) protein. Although the chlamydial genome sequencing project did not unveil an obvious Fur homologue, a detailed examination indicated five unassigned open reading frames (ORFs) that would encode products with limited sequence homology to Fur. In this report, each chlamydial ORF was engineered in E. coli, and recombinant proteins were examined for functional characteristics resembling Fur. A Fur-specific polyclonal antiserum revealed that the protein encoded by ORF CT296 shares antigenic cross-recognition. Moreover, this protein forms dimers in solution in a fashion analogous to E. coli Fur. Further studies confirmed that the product of ORF CT296 is able to (i) complement Fur activity in a mutant strain of E. coli; and (ii) specifically bind to a 19 bp consensus sequence found in promoters of iron-regulated genes in E. coli. We propose a designation of dcrA (divalent cation-dependent regulator A) for ORF CT296, which encodes a protein distantly related to E. coli Fur. DcrA represents the first repressor described for this obligate intracellular bacterium.

Identification and mapping of sigma-54 promoters in Chlamydia trachomatis

The first sigma(54) promoters in Chlamydia trachomatis L2 were mapped upstream of hypothetical proteins CT652.1 and CT683. Comparative genomics indicated that these sigma(54) promoters and potential upstream activation binding sites are conserved in orthologous C. trachomatis D, C. trachomatis mouse pneumonitis strain, and Chlamydia pneumoniae (CWL029 and AR39) genes.

A positive cis-acting DNA element is required for high-level transcription in Chlamydia

The spacer A/T region is a positive cis-acting DNA element that was identified in the Chlamydia trachomatis rRNA promoter region. We have now demonstrated that similar sequences in other chlamydial promoters are important for transcription. Substitution of candidate spacer A/T regions in four chlamydial promoters decreased transcription by partially purified C. trachomatis RNA polymerase in an in vitro transcription assay. Addition of a spacer A/T region to the dnaK promoter, which does not contain an identifiable spacer A/T region, increased transcription 16-fold. Transcription of Escherichia coli promoters by C. trachomatis RNA polymerase also appeared to be dependent on the spacer A/T region. However, the effect of the spacer A/T region on transcription by E. coli RNA polymerase was small. In summary, the spacer A/T region is a novel DNA element that is required for high-level transcription of many promoters by chlamydial RNA polymerase.

Identification and characterization of promoters regulating tuf expression in Chlamydia trachomatis serovar F

Gene expression in the obligate intracellular bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis ranges from nil in the infectious EB form to high in the dividing RB form. Little is known about the mechanisms of gene regulation in chlamydiae and only a few promoter sequences have been characterized. The purpose of our study was to examine the expression of a cluster of genes that are required for translation in C. trachomatis serovar F: infA (encoding Initiation Factor 1), tRNA(Thr), tuf (encoding Elongation Factor Tu), and tRNA(Trp). Primer extension analysis indicated that tuf is expressed in three different mRNAs. Putative promoter sequences for these transcripts were defined as P1 (upstream of tRNA(Thr)), P2 (within infA) and P3 (upstream of infA). Quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that P1 transcripts were most abundant at 16 h postinfection (pi), whereas P2 transcripts predominated at 24 h pi. P3 was active at all times pi; however, transcription terminated upstream of tuf at early times pi and continued through tuf at later times. P1 and P3 were active in Escherichia coli, as assessed by CAT expression in promoter-fusion vectors and a chlamydial in vitro transcription system. Site-specific mutagenesis confirmed the importance of the -35 and -10 hexamers in the P1 and P3 promoters. P2 was weakly active in E. coli and inactive in the in vitro transcription system, indicating either that the P2 transcript is processed from a longer transcript or that P2 expression requires a sigma or transcription factor which is not present in E. coli or the in vitro transcription system. Our data suggest that multiple processes play a role in the regulation of tuf gene expression during the developmental cycle.

Characterization of in vitro DNA binding sites of the EUO protein of Chlamydia psittaci

The EUO gene of chlamydia is highly expressed early in the developmental cycle, relative to other genes, but continues to be expressed throughout the active growth phases. The precise function of EUO protein is not known, but it binds to DNA in vitro. In this study, we developed a selection and amplification scheme for identifying chlamydial genomic fragments to which EUO preferentially binds in vitro. The scheme involved mixing recombinant EUO with a Chlamydia psittaci genomic library in a pBluescript plasmid vector in vitro, trapping EUO-bound plasmid clones on filters, and amplifying the clones in Escherichia coli. After nine rounds of enrichment, the EUO binding sites of the three most highly enriched clones were identified by DNase I footprint analysis. All three clones had multiple binding sites of various sizes with no clear distinguishing feature other than they were AT-rich and were usually not located in putative promoter regions. We used limited site-specific mutagenesis to characterize the strongest binding site of the most-highly-enriched clone, which represented about 50% of the population after nine rounds. This mutagenesis identified a core binding site of 15 nucleotides (nt) whose sequence was used to find related sequences within each of the strong binding sites in the other two clones. Using the frequency of bases at specific positions within this group of sequences as a guide, we carried out trial-and-error searching with many related sequences, eliminating those which identified nonfootprinted sites. This process led us to the consensus 15-nt sequence AHGAAAWVTYTWDAY, which, when allowing two mismatches, picked out all of the strong binding sites and no nonfootprinting sites within the three enriched clones. This sequence may be useful for predicting additional possible EUO binding sites in the chlamydial genome.

Conservation of putative promoter sequences located upstream of chlamydial major sigma factor gene, sigA among Chlamydia spp

A highly conserved 40-nucleotide sequence was identified. Two completely conserved sequences, TAGATT and TAAACT, separated by 17 nucleotides resemble the consensus sequence recognized by the Escherichia coli major sigma factor and sequence found in other chlamydial promoters. In addition, the adenine-rich sequence present in many chlamydial promoters was also conserved upstream of the putative -35 element. These findings suggest that the conserved sequence may play a role in the regulatory function at the transcriptional level. Multiple ATG codons were found at the 5'-terminal region of the chlamydial sigA ORFs except for Chlamydia pneumoniae, although the putative Shine-Dargarno sequence was absent.

Mutational analysis of the Chlamydia trachomatis rRNA P1 promoter defines four regions important for transcription in vitro

We have characterized the Chlamydia trachomatis ribosomal promoter, rRNA P1, by measuring the effect of substitutions and deletions on in vitro transcription with partially purified C. trachomatis RNA polymerase. Our analyses indicate that rRNA P1 contains potential -10 and -35 elements, analogous to Escherichia coli promoters recognized by E-sigma70. We identified a novel AT-rich region immediately downstream of the -35 region. The effect of this region was specific for C. trachomatis RNA polymerase and strongly attenuated by single G or C substitutions. Upstream of the -35 region was an AT-rich sequence that enhanced transcription by C. trachomatis and E. coli RNA polymerases. We propose that this region functions as an UP element.

Identification of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis gene expression signals

Mycobacterium paratuberculosis promoter-containing clones were isolated from a genomic DNA library constructed in the transcriptional-translational fusion vector pYUB76. The promoter-containing DNA fragments were identified in the surrogate host Mycobacterium smegmatis by expression of the promoterless lacZ reporter gene of pYUB76. The expression signals exhibited a wide range of strengths, as indicated by their corresponding beta-galactosidase activities. Eight clones were sequenced and characterized further. Predicted open reading frames and codon usage were identified by computer analysis. Database searching for related sequences using the BLAST method revealed no homologies. Transcriptional activity was measured by slot-blot hybridization with steady-state RNA isolated from lacZ+ M. smegmatis clones. Primer extension analysis identified the transcription start sites within the cloned fragments. The promoter regions characterized in this study were used to establish a consensus promoter sequence for M. paratuberculosis. M. paratuberculosis consensus hexanucleotide sequences of TGMCGT and CGGCCS centred approximately 35 and 10 bp upstream from the transcription startpoints do not correspond to the consensus hexanucleotides of Escherichia coli promoters.