Use of an in vivo titration method to study a global regulator: effect of varying Lrp levels on expression of gltBDF in Escherichia coli

Evolution of a global regulator: Lrp in four orders of γ-Proteobacteria

Background

Bacterial global regulators each regulate the expression of several hundred genes. In Escherichia coli, the top seven global regulators together control over half of all genes. Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is one of these top seven global regulators. Lrp orthologs are very widely distributed, among both Bacteria and Archaea. Surprisingly, even within the phylum γ-Proteobacteria (which includes E. coli), Lrp is a global regulator in some orders and a local regulator in others. This raises questions about the evolution of Lrp and, more broadly, of global regulators.

Results

We examined Lrp sequences from four bacterial orders of the γ-Proteobacteria using phylogenetic and Logo analyses. The orders studied were Enterobacteriales and Vibrionales, in which Lrp plays a global role in tested species; Pasteurellales, in which Lrp is a local regulator in the tested species; and Alteromonadales, an order closely related to the other three but in which Lrp has not yet been studied. For comparison, we analyzed the Lrp paralog AsnC, which in all tested cases is a local regulator. The Lrp and AsnC phylogenetic clusters each divided, as expected, into subclusters representing the Enterobacteriales, Vibrionales, and Pasteuralles. However the Alteromonadales did not yield coherent clusters for either Lrp or AsnC. Logo analysis revealed signatures associated with globally- vs. locally- acting Lrp orthologs, providing testable hypotheses for which portions of Lrp are responsible for a global vs. local role. These candidate regions include both ends of the Lrp polypeptide but not, interestingly, the highly-conserved helix-turn-helix motif responsible for DNA sequence specificity.

Conclusions

Lrp and AsnC have conserved sequence signatures that allow their unambiguous annotation, at least in γ-Proteobacteria. Among Lrp orthologs, specific residues correlated with global vs. local regulatory roles, and can now be tested to determine which are functionally relevant and which simply reflect divergence. In the Alteromonadales, it appears that there are different subgroups of Lrp orthologs, one of which may act globally while the other may act locally. These results suggest experiments to improve our understanding of the evolution of bacterial global regulators.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0685-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Global Transcription Factor Lrp Controls Virulence Modulation in Xenorhabdus nematophila

The bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila engages in phenotypic variation with respect to pathogenicity against insect larvae, yielding both virulent and attenuated subpopulations of cells from an isogenic culture. The global regulatory protein Lrp is necessary for X. nematophila virulence and immunosuppression in insects, as well as colonization of the mutualistic host nematode Steinernema carpocapsae, and mediates expression of numerous genes implicated in each of these phenotypes. Given the central role of Lrp in X. nematophila host associations, as well as its involvement in regulating phenotypic variation pathways in other bacteria, we assessed its function in virulence modulation. We discovered that expression of lrp varies within an isogenic population, in a manner that correlates with modulation of virulence. Unexpectedly, although Lrp is necessary for optimal virulence and immunosuppression, cells expressing high levels of lrp were attenuated in these processes relative to those with low to intermediate lrp expression. Furthermore, fixed expression of lrp at high and low levels resulted in attenuated and normal virulence and immunosuppression, respectively, and eliminated population variability of these phenotypes. These data suggest that fluctuating lrp expression levels are sufficient to drive phenotypic variation in X. nematophila.

IMPORTANCE

Many bacteria use cell-to-cell phenotypic variation, characterized by distinct phenotypic subpopulations within an isogenic population, to cope with environmental change. Pathogenic bacteria utilize this strategy to vary antigen or virulence factor expression. Our work establishes that the global transcription factor Lrp regulates phenotypic variation in the insect pathogen Xenorhabdus nematophila, leading to attenuation of virulence and immunosuppression in insect hosts. Unexpectedly, we found an inverse correlation between Lrp expression levels and virulence: high levels of expression of Lrp-dependent putative virulence genes are detrimental for virulence but may have an adaptive advantage in other aspects of the life cycle. Investigation of X. nematophila phenotypic variation facilitates dissection of this phenomenon in the context of a naturally occurring symbiosis.

Expression levels of transcription factors in Escherichia coli: growth phase- and growth condition-dependent variation of 90 regulators from six families

The expression pattern of the genome in Escherichia coli is controlled by regulating the utilization of a limited number of RNA polymerases between a total of 4600 genes on its genome. The distribution pattern of RNA polymerase on the genome changes after two steps of protein–protein interaction with seven sigma subunits and about 300 transcription factors (TFs). Based on a systematic search for the regulation target promoters recognized by each TF, we propose two novel concepts: each TF regulates a number of target promoters; and each promoter is regulated by many TFs. In parallel, attempts have been made to determine the intracellular concentrations of all TFs using two systems: quantitative immunoblot analysis using TF-specific antibodies; and reporter assay of TF promoter activities. The direct measurement of TF protein level has so far been published for a set of 60 regulators with known functions. This study describes the determination of growth phase-dependent expression levels of 90 TFs using the reporter assay system. The translational fusion vector was constructed from the TF promoter sequence including an N-terminal proximal TF segment and the reporter GFP. At the beginning of cell growth, high-level expression was observed only for a small number of TFs. In the exponential phase, approximately 80 % TFs are expressed, but the expressed TF species change upon transfer to the stationary phase. Significant changes in the pattern of TF expression were observed between aerobic and anaerobic conditions. The list of intracellular levels of TFs provides further understanding to the transcription regulation of the E. coli genome under various stressful conditions.

Intracellular concentrations of 65 species of transcription factors with known regulatory functions in Escherichia coli

The expression pattern of the Escherichia coli genome is controlled in part by regulating the utilization of a limited number of RNA polymerases among a total of its approximately 4,600 genes. The distribution pattern of RNA polymerase changes from modulation of two types of protein-protein interactions: the interaction of core RNA polymerase with seven species of the sigma subunit for differential promoter recognition and the interaction of RNA polymerase holoenzyme with about 300 different species of transcription factors (TFs) with regulatory functions. We have been involved in the systematic search for the target promoters recognized by each sigma factor and each TF using the newly developed Genomic SELEX system. In parallel, we developed the promoter-specific (PS)-TF screening system for identification of the whole set of TFs involved in regulation of each promoter. Understanding the regulation of genome transcription also requires knowing the intracellular concentrations of the sigma subunits and TFs under various growth conditions. This report describes the intracellular levels of 65 species of TF with known function in E. coli K-12 W3110 at various phases of cell growth and at various temperatures. The list of intracellular concentrations of the sigma factors and TFs provides a community resource for understanding the transcription regulation of E. coli under various stressful conditions in nature.

Nitrogen assimilation in Escherichia coli: putting molecular data into a systems perspective

We present a comprehensive overview of the hierarchical network of intracellular processes revolving around central nitrogen metabolism in Escherichia coli. The hierarchy intertwines transport, metabolism, signaling leading to posttranslational modification, and transcription. The protein components of the network include an ammonium transporter (AmtB), a glutamine transporter (GlnHPQ), two ammonium assimilation pathways (glutamine synthetase [GS]-glutamate synthase [glutamine 2-oxoglutarate amidotransferase {GOGAT}] and glutamate dehydrogenase [GDH]), the two bifunctional enzymes adenylyl transferase/adenylyl-removing enzyme (ATase) and uridylyl transferase/uridylyl-removing enzyme (UTase), the two trimeric signal transduction proteins (GlnB and GlnK), the two-component regulatory system composed of the histidine protein kinase nitrogen regulator II (NRII) and the response nitrogen regulator I (NRI), three global transcriptional regulators called nitrogen assimilation control (Nac) protein, leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp), and cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (Crp), the glutaminases, and the nitrogen-phosphotransferase system. First, the structural and molecular knowledge on these proteins is reviewed. Thereafter, the activities of the components as they engage together in transport, metabolism, signal transduction, and transcription and their regulation are discussed. Next, old and new molecular data and physiological data are put into a common perspective on integral cellular functioning, especially with the aim of resolving counterintuitive or paradoxical processes featured in nitrogen assimilation. Finally, we articulate what still remains to be discovered and what general lessons can be learned from the vast amounts of data that are available now.

Recognition of DNA by the helix-turn-helix global regulatory protein Lrp is modulated by the amino terminus

The AsnC/Lrp family of regulatory proteins links bacterial and archaeal transcription patterns to metabolism. In Escherichia coli, Lrp regulates approximately 400 genes, over 200 of them directly. In earlier studies, lrp genes from Vibrio cholerae, Proteus mirabilis, and E. coli were introduced into the same E. coli background and yielded overlapping but significantly different regulons. These differences were seen despite amino acid sequence identities of 92% (Vibrio) and 98% (Proteus) to E. coli Lrp, including complete conservation of the helix-turn-helix motifs. The N-terminal region contains many of the sequence differences among these Lrp orthologs, which led us to investigate its role in Lrp function. Through the generation of hybrid proteins, we found that the N-terminal diversity is responsible for some of the differences between orthologs in terms of DNA binding (as revealed by mobility shift assays) and multimerization (as revealed by gel filtration, dynamic light scattering, and analytical ultracentrifugation). These observations indicate that the N-terminal tail plays a significant role in modulating Lrp function, similar to what is seen for a number of other regulatory proteins.

Unexpected coregulator range for the global regulator Lrp of Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis

The Lrp/AsnC family of transcription factors links gene regulation to metabolism in bacteria and archaea. Members of this family, collectively, respond to a wide range of amino acids as coregulators. In Escherichia coli, Lrp regulates over 200 genes directly and is well known to respond to leucine and, to a somewhat lesser extent, alanine. We focused on Lrp from Proteus mirabilis and E. coli, orthologs with 98% identity overall and identical helix-turn-helix motifs, for which a previous study nevertheless found functional differences. Sequence differences between these orthologs, within and adjacent to the amino acid-responsive RAM domain, led us to test for differential sensitivity to coregulatory amino acids. In the course of this investigation, we found, via in vivo reporter fusion assays and in vitro electrophoretic mobility shift experiments, that E. coli Lrp itself responded to a broader range of amino acids than was previously appreciated. In particular, for both the E. coli and P. mirabilis orthologs, Lrp responsiveness to methionine was similar in magnitude to that to leucine. Both Lrp orthologs are also fairly sensitive to Ile, His, and Thr. These observations suggest that Lrp ties gene expression in the Enterobacteriaceae rather extensively to physiological status, as reflected in amino acid pools. These findings also have substantial implications for attempts to model regulatory architecture from transcriptome measurements or to infer such architecture from genome sequences, and they suggest that even well-studied regulators deserve ongoing exploration.

Autoregulated expression of the gene coding for the leucine-responsive protein, Lrp, a global regulator in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium

In this study, the lrp gene encoding the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium was found to be negatively autoregulated. Its transcription start site was determined by primer extension analysis, showing that the lrp promoter is located at a different site to that inferred previously from the S. Typhimurium genome sequence. Chromosomal DNA fragments that include the promoter region were bound by purified Lrp protein in vitro, producing up to four distinct protein-DNA complexes. DNase I footprinting identified regions that were protected by the protein in vitro as well as bases that became hypersensitive to DNase I treatment following Lrp binding. A clear pattern of periodic hypersensitivity was detected between positions -130 and +15 that was consistent with wrapping of the DNA around Lrp in a nucleoprotein complex that includes the putative promoter region. Lrp-DNA interaction in this region was fully consistent with the observed repression of lrp transcription by this protein. Leucine was found to modulate Lrp-mediated autorepression by remodelling the Lrp-DNA nucleoprotein complex.

Limited functional conservation of a global regulator among related bacterial genera: Lrp in Escherichia, Proteus and Vibrio

Background

Bacterial genome sequences are being determined rapidly, but few species are physiologically well characterized. Predicting regulation from genome sequences usually involves extrapolation from better-studied bacteria, using the hypothesis that a conserved regulator, conserved target gene, and predicted regulator-binding site in the target promoter imply conserved regulation between the two species. However many compared organisms are ecologically and physiologically diverse, and the limits of extrapolation have not been well tested. In E. coli K-12 the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) affects expression of ~400 genes. Proteus mirabilis and Vibrio cholerae have highly-conserved lrp orthologs (98% and 92% identity to E. coli lrp). The functional equivalence of Lrp from these related species was assessed.

Results

Heterologous Lrp regulated gltB, livK and lrp transcriptional fusions in an E. coli background in the same general way as the native Lrp, though with significant differences in extent. Microarray analysis of these strains revealed that the heterologous Lrp proteins significantly influence only about half of the genes affected by native Lrp. In P. mirabilis, heterologous Lrp restored swarming, though with some pattern differences. P. mirabilis produced substantially more Lrp than E. coli or V. cholerae under some conditions. Lrp regulation of target gene orthologs differed among the three native hosts. Strikingly, while Lrp negatively regulates its own gene in E. coli, and was shown to do so even more strongly in P. mirabilis, Lrp appears to activate its own gene in V. cholerae.

Conclusion

The overall similarity of regulatory effects of the Lrp orthologs supports the use of extrapolation between related strains for general purposes. However this study also revealed intrinsic differences even between orthologous regulators sharing >90% overall identity, and 100% identity for the DNA-binding helix-turn-helix motif, as well as differences in the amounts of those regulators. These results suggest that predicting regulation of specific target genes based on genome sequence comparisons alone should be done on a conservative basis.

Regulation of Fimbrial Expression

Fimbria-mediated interaction with the host elicits both innate and adaptive immune responses, and thus their expression may not always be beneficial in vivo. Furthermore, the metabolic drain of producing fimbriae is significant. It is not surprising, therefore, to find that fimbrial production in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica is under extensive environmental regulation. In many instances, fimbrial expression is regulated by phase variation, in which individual cells are capable of switching between fimbriate and afimbriate states to produce a mixed population. Mechanisms of phase variation vary considerably between different fimbriae and involve both genetic and epigenetic processes. Notwithstanding this, fimbrial expression is also sometimes controlled at the posttranscriptional level. In this chapter, we review key features of the regulation of fimbrial gene expression in E. coli and Salmonella. The occurrence and distribution of fimbrial operons vary significantly among E. coli pathovars and even among the many Salmonella serovars. Therefore, general principles are presented on the basis of detailed discussion of paradigms that have been extensively studied, including Pap, type 1 fimbriae, and curli. The roles of operon specific regulators like FimB or CsgD and of global regulatory proteins like Lrp, CpxR, and the histone-like proteins H-NS and IHF are reviewed as are the roles of sRNAs and of signalling nucleotide cyclic-di-GMP. Individual examples are discussed in detail to illustrate how the regulatory factors cooperate to allow tight control of expression of single operons. Molecular networks that allow coordinated expression between multiple fimbrial operons and with flagella in a single isolate are also presented. This chapter illustrates how adhesin expression is controlled, and the model systems also illustrate general regulatory principles germane to our overall understanding of bacterial gene regulation.

Escherichia coli enzyme IIANtr regulates the K+ transporter TrkA

The maintenance of ionic homeostasis in response to changes in the environment is essential for all living cells. Although there are still many important questions concerning the role of the major monovalent cation K(+), cytoplasmic K(+) in bacteria is required for diverse processes. Here, we show that enzyme IIA(Ntr) (EIIA(Ntr)) of the nitrogen-metabolic phosphotransferase system interacts with and regulates the Escherichia coli K(+) transporter TrkA. Previously we reported that an E. coli K-12 mutant in the ptsN gene encoding EIIA(Ntr) was extremely sensitive to growth inhibition by leucine or leucine-containing peptides (LCPs). This sensitivity was due to the requirement of the dephosphorylated form of EIIA(Ntr) for the derepression of ilvBN expression. Whereas the ptsN mutant is extremely sensitive to LCPs, a ptsN trkA double mutant is as resistant as WT. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the ptsN mutant to LCPs decreases as the K(+) level in culture media is lowered. We demonstrate that dephosphorylated EIIA(Ntr), but not its phosphorylated form, forms a tight complex with TrkA that inhibits the accumulation of high intracellular concentrations of K(+). High cellular K(+) levels in a ptsN mutant promote the sensitivity of E. coli K-12 to leucine or LCPs by inhibiting both the expression of ilvBN and the activity of its gene products. Here, we delineate the similarity of regulatory mechanisms for the paralogous carbon and nitrogen phosphotransferase systems. Dephosphorylated EIIA(Glc) regulates a variety of transport systems for carbon sources, whereas dephosphorylated EIIA(Ntr) regulates the transport system for K(+), which has global effects related to nitrogen metabolism.

Motifs, modules and games in bacteria

Global explorations of regulatory network dynamics, organization and evolution have become tractable thanks to high-throughput sequencing and molecular measurement of bacterial physiology. From these, a nascent conceptual framework is developing, that views the principles of regulation in term of motifs, modules and games. Motifs are small, repeated, and conserved biological units ranging from molecular domains to small reaction networks. They are arranged into functional modules, genetically dissectible cellular functions such as the cell cycle, or different stress responses. The dynamical functioning of modules defines the organism's strategy to survive in a game, pitting cell against cell, and cell against environment. Placing pathway structure and dynamics into an evolutionary context begins to allow discrimination between those physical and molecular features that particularize a species to its surroundings, and those that provide core physiological function. This approach promises to generate a higher level understanding of cellular design, pathway evolution and cellular bioengineering.

Fifteen minutes of fim: control of type 1 pili expression in E. coli

Pili are used by Escherichia coli to attach to and invade mammalian tissues during host infection and colonization. Expression of type 1 pili, believed to act as virulence factors in urinary tract infections, is under control of the 'firm' genetic network. This network is able to sense the environment and actuate phase variation control. It is a prime exemplar of an integrative regulatory system because of its role in mediating a complex infection process, and because it instantiates a number of regulatory motifs, including DNA inversion and stochastic variation. With the help of a mathematical model, we explore the mechanisms and architecture of the fim network. We explain (1) basic network operation, including the roles of the recombinase and global regulatory protein concentrations, their DNA binding affinities, and their switching rates in observed phase variation behavior; (2) why there are two recombinases when one would seem to suffice; (3) the source of on-to-off switching specificity of FimE; (4) the role of fimE orientational control in switch dynamics; and (5) how temperature tuning of piliation is achieved. In the process, we identify a general regulatory motif that tunes phenotype to an environmental variable, and explain a number of apparent experimental inconsistencies.

A role for the leucine-responsive regulatory protein and integration host factor in the regulation of the Salmonella plasmid virulence (spv ) locus in Salmonella typhimurium

The Salmonella plasmid virulence (spv ) genes of Salmonella typhimurium are activated at the level of transcription as the bacteria enter stationary phase in vitro or in response to signals received during intracellular growth. Activation requires the LysR-like transcription factor SpvR and the alternative sigma factor RpoS. In this report, we show by biochemical and genetic analyses that two chromosomally encoded DNA-binding proteins contribute to the control of spv expression. These are the integration host factor (IHF), which binds to DNA sequences upstream of the spvR regulatory gene, and the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp), which binds to sequences upstream of the spvABCD operon. Under all conditions tested, inactivation of IHF expression reduces the level of spvR transcription by twofold. It also alters the response of the spv regulon to loss of DNA gyrase activity, consistent with a role for IHF in organizing DNA structure in the vicinity of the spvR promoter. Lrp represses spvA gene expression by up to fivefold and Lrp-mediated repression is antagonized by leucine. The Lrp binding site upstream of the spvA gene overlaps one of the binding sites for the positive regulator SpvR, suggesting a mechanism by which Lrp repression is exerted. This is a first demonstration of a role for Lrp in controlling genes that are also subject to intracellular regulation. These data show that the spv virulence genes belong simultaneously to several regulons in the cell, raising the possibility that spv expression can be fine-tuned in response to multiple environmental inputs.

Two roles for the leucine-responsive regulatory protein in expression of the alanine catabolic operon (dadAB) in Klebsiella aerogenes

The lrp gene, which codes for the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp), was cloned from Klebsiella aerogenes W70. The DNA sequence was determined, and the clone was used to create a disruption of the lrp gene. The lack of functional Lrp led to an increased expression of the alanine catabolic operon (dad) in the absence of the inducer L-alanine but also to a decreased expression of the operon in the presence of L-alanine. Thus, Lrp is both a repressor and activator of dad expression. Lrp is also necessary for glutamate synthase formation but not for the formation of two other enzymes controlled by the nitrogen regulatory (Ntr) system, glutamate dehydrogenase and histidase.

Roles for GcvA-binding sites 3 and 2 and the Lrp-binding region in gcvT::lacZ expression in Escherichia coli

GcvA and Lrp are both necessary for activation of the gcv operon. The upstream GcvA-binding sites 3 and 2 were separated from the Lrp-binding region and the rest of the gcv control region. Moving these sites by 1 or 2 helical turns of DNA further from the gcv promoter reduces, but does not eliminate, either GcvA-mediated activation or repression of a gcvT::lacZ gene fusion. However, moving these sites by 1.5 or 2.5 helical turns of DNA results in a GcvA-mediated super-repression of the operon. This repression is dependent on Lrp and is partially dependent on GcvR. Lrp bound to the gcv control region induces a bend in the DNA. Based on these results, a model for gcv regulation is presented in which Lrp plays a primarily structural role, by bending the DNA and GcvA functions as the activator protein.

Comparison of the sensitivities of two Escherichia coli genes to in vivo variation of Lrp concentration

Transcription of the Escherichia coli genes serA and gltBDF depends on the leucine-responsive regulatory protein, Lrp, and is very much decreased in an lrp mutant. By the use of an Lrp-deficient host and the lrp gene cloned under a plasmid-borne arabinose pBAD promoter, we varied the amount of Lrp present in the cell and showed that both genes were transcribed in proportion to the amount of Lrp synthesized. The affinity of serA for Lrp was four to five times greater than the affinity of gltD. Overproduction of Lrp was lethal to the cell.

Leucine alters the interaction of the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) with the fim switch to stimulate site-specific recombination in Escherichia coli

The leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is a global regulator that controls the expression of numerous operons in Escherichia coli. Lrp can act as a repressor or as an activator of transcription with its effects being potentiated, repressed or unaffected by the presence of exogenous leucine. The phase variation of type 1 fimbria in E. coli provides a unique system in which to investigate the effects of leucine on Lrp, as it is the only known example in which Lrp is a positive regulator and leucine potentiates this effect. Previous studies determined that Lrp binds with high affinity to two sites within the fim switch (fim sites 1 and 2), and binding to these sites stimulates recombination. Here, it is shown that, even though leucine stimulates the fim switch in vivo, it nevertheless causes a slight decrease in Lrp binding to the fim switch in vitro. These contradictory results are explicable by the finding that Lrp binding to a third region adjacent to fim sites 1 and 2 inhibits recombination. According to this model, leucine stimulates recombination by selectively disrupting Lrp binding to this newly characterized region, while having little or no effect on Lrp binding to fim sites 1 and 2.

Use of an inducible regulatory protein to identify members of a regulon: application to the regulon controlled by the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) in Escherichia coli

Procedures were developed to facilitate the identification of genes that belong to a given regulon and characterization of their responses to the regulator. The regulon controlled by the Escherichia coli leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) was studied by isolating random transcriptional fusions to lacZ, using lambda placMu53 and a strain in which lrp is under isopropylthio-beta-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible control. Fusions exhibiting IPTG-responsive beta-galactosidase activity were cloned by integrating the suicide vector pIVET1 via homologous recombination at lacZ, followed by self-ligating digested chromosomal DNA. We verified the patterns of lacZ expression after using the plasmid clones to generate merodiploid strains with interrupted and uninterrupted copies of the same sequence. If the merodiploid expression pattern was unchanged from that shown by the original fusion strain, then the cloned fusion was responsible for the regulatory pattern of interest; a difference in the expression pattern could indicate that the original strain carried multiple fusions or that there were autogenous effects of having interrupted the fused gene. Using these procedures, we generated a fusion library of approximately 5 x 10(6) strains; approximately 3,000 of these strains were screened, yielding 84 Lrp-responsive fusions, and 10 of the 84 were phenotypically stable and were characterized. The responses of different fusions in a given operon to in vivo Lrp titrations revealed variations in expression with the position of insertion. Among the newly identified members of the regulon is an open reading frame (orf3) between rpiA and serA. Also, expression of a fusion just downstream of dinF was found to be Lrp dependent only in stationary phase.

An lrp-like gene of Bacillus subtilis involved in branched-chain amino acid transport

The azlB locus of Bacillus subtilis was defined previously by a mutation conferring resistance to a leucine analog, 4-azaleucine (J. B. Ward, Jr., and S. A. Zahler, J. Bacteriol. 116:727-735, 1973). In this report, azlB is shown to be the first gene of an operon apparently involved in branched-chain amino acid transport. The product of the azlB gene is an Lrp-like protein that negatively regulates expression of the azlBCDEF operon. Resistance to 4-azaleucine in azlB mutants is due to overproduction of AzlC and AzlD, two novel hydrophobic proteins.

A nucleoprotein activation complex between the leucine-responsive regulatory protein and DNA upstream of the gltBDF operon in Escherichia coli

The global regulator Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein), in some cases modulated by its co-regulator leucine, has been shown to regulate more than 40 genes and operons in Escherichia coli. Leucine modulates Lrp regulation of leucine-responsive operons. The level of sensitivity of these operons to leucine varies greatly, but the basis for this variation is only partially understood. One operon controlled by Lrp that is relatively insensitive to leucine is gltBDF, which includes genes specifying the large (GltB) and small (GltD) subunits of glutamate synthase. Earlier gel mobility shift assays have demonstrated that Lrp binds to a fragment of DNA containing the gltBDF promoter region. To further define the nature of this Lrp-gltBDF interaction, DNase I footprinting experiments were performed. The results indicate that Lrp binds cooperatively to three sites quite far upstream, spanning the region from -140 to -260 base-pairs relative to the start of transcription. Phased hypersensitivity is observed throughout the entire binding region, suggesting that Lrp bends the DNA. To determine the relative importance of these three sites for the transcriptional activation of gltBDF, a series of site-directed mutations was generated. The effects of these mutations on Lrp binding were determined both by DNase I footprinting and by quantitative mobility shift assays, while their effects on transcription in vivo were examined by measuring beta-galactosidase activity levels of chromosomal gltB::lacZ operon fusions. Our results indicate that all three sites are required for maximal gene expression, as is the proper phasing of the sites with one another and with the start of transcription. Our results suggest that Lrp binds a central palindromic site, interacting predominantly with the major groove of its DNA target, and that additional dimers bind to flanking sites to form a nucleoprotein activation complex.