Stimulatory effect of trehalose on formation and activity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase E sigma38 holoenzyme

Building a complete image of genome regulation in the model organism Escherichia coli

The model organism, Escherichia coli, contains a total of more than 4,500 genes, but the total number of RNA polymerase (RNAP) core enzyme or the transcriptase is only about 2,000 molecules per genome. The regulatory targets of RNAP are, however, modulated by changing its promoter selectivity through two-steps of protein-protein interplay with 7 species of the sigma factor in the first step, and then 300 species of the transcription factor (TF) in the second step. Scientists working in the field of prokaryotic transcription in Japan have made considerable contributions to the elucidation of genetic frameworks and regulatory modes of the genome transcription in E. coli K-12. This review summarizes the findings by this group, first focusing on three sigma factors, the stationary-phase sigma RpoS, the heat-shock sigma RpoH, and the flagellar-chemotaxis sigma RpoF, as examples. It also presents an overview of the current state of the systematic research being carried out to identify the regulatory functions of all TFs from a single and the same bacterium E. coli K-12, using the genomic SELEX and PS-TF screening systems. All these studies have been undertaken with the aim of understanding the genome regulation in E. coli K-12 as a whole.

The molecular basis of selective promoter activation by the ?Ssubunit of RNA polymerase

Different environmental stimuli cause bacteria to exchange the sigma subunit in the RNA polymerase (RNAP) and, thereby, tune their gene expression according to the newly emerging needs. Sigma factors are usually thought to recognize clearly distinguishable promoter DNA determinants, and thereby activate distinct gene sets, known as their regulons. In this review, we illustrate how the principle sigma factor in stationary phase and in stressful conditions in Escherichia coli, sigmaS (RpoS), can specifically target its large regulon in vivo, although it is known to recognize the same core promoter elements in vitro as the housekeeping sigma factor, sigma70 (RpoD). Variable combinations of cis-acting promoter features and trans-acting protein factors determine whether a promoter is recognized by RNAP containing sigmaS or sigma70, or by both holoenzymes. How these promoter features impose sigmaS selectivity is further discussed. Moreover, additional pathways allow sigmaS to compete more efficiently than sigma70 for limiting amounts of core RNAP (E) and thereby enhance EsigmaS formation and effectiveness. Finally, these topics are discussed in the context of sigma factor evolution and the benefits a cell gains from retaining competing and closely related sigma factors with overlapping sets of target genes.

Poly(A)-polymerase I links transcription with mRNA degradation via sigmaS proteolysis

Bacteria rapidly adapt to changes in growth conditions through control of transcription and specific mRNA degradation. Interplay of both mechanisms must exist in order to achieve fine-tuned regulation of gene expression. Transcription of the Escherichia coli bolA gene is mediated by the RpoS/sigmaS transcription factor in response to environmental signals. In this report it is shown that the mechanisms of bolA1p mRNA transcription and degradation are tightly connected at the onset of stationary phase and in response to sudden carbon starvation. In stationary phase, bolA1p mRNA levels were reduced 2.5-fold in a poly(A)-polymerase I (PAPI) mutant, explained by the significant threefold reduction in sigmaS protein levels in the same strain. Furthermore, fusions with the rpoS gene, analysis of the stability of sigmaS and the levels of RssB indicate that the absence of PAPI enhances RssB-mediated sigmaS proteolysis specifically in starved cells. The fact that PAPI induces higher cellular levels of a global regulator is a novel finding of wide biological significance. PAPI could work as a linker between transcription and mRNA degradation with the ultimate goal of adapting and surviving to growth-limiting conditions.

Classification and strength measurement of stationary-phase promoters by use of a newly developed promoter cloning vector

When an Escherichia coli culture changes from exponential growth to the stationary phase, expression of growth-related genes levels off, while a number of stationary-phase-specific genes are turned on. To gain insight into the growth phase-dependent global regulation of genome transcription, we analyzed the strength and specificity of promoters associated with the stationary-phase genes. For the in vivo assay of promoter activity, 300- to 500-bp DNA fragments upstream from the translation initiation codon were isolated and inserted into a newly constructed doubly fluorescent protein (DFP) vector. The activity of test promoters was determined by measuring the green fluorescent protein (GFP). To avoid the possible influence of plasmid copy number, the level of transcription of reference promoter lacUV5 on the same plasmid was determined by measuring the red fluorescent protein (RFP). Thus, the activities of test promoters could be easily and accurately determined by determining the GFP/RFP ratio. Analysis of the culture time-dependent variation of 100 test promoters indicated that (i) a major group of the stationary-phase promoters are up-regulated only in the presence of RpoS sigma; (ii) the phase-coupled increase in the activity of some promoters takes place even in the absence of RpoS; and (iii) the activity of some promoters increases in the absence of RpoS. This classification was confirmed by testing in vitro transcription by using reconstituted RpoD and RpoS holoenzymes.

Osmo-regulation of bacterial transcription via poised RNA polymerase

Adaptation to high-salt environments is critical for the survival of a wide range of cells, especially for pathogenic bacteria that colonize the animal gut and urinary tract. The adaptation strategy involves production of the salt potassium glutamate, which induces a specific gene expression program that produces electro-neutral osmolytes while inhibiting general sigma(70) transcription. These data show that in Escherichia coli potassium glutamate stimulates transcription by disengaging inhibitory polymerase interactions at a sigma(38) promoter. These occur in an upstream region that is marked by an osmotic shock promoter DNA consensus sequence. The disruption activates a poised RNA polymerase to transcribe. This transcription program leads to the production of osmolytes that are shown to have only minor effects on transcription and therefore help to restore normal cell function. An osmotic shock gene expression cycle is discussed.

Crl, a low temperature-induced protein in Escherichia coli that binds directly to the stationary phase sigma subunit of RNA polymerase

The alternative sigma factor sigma(S) (RpoS) of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase regulates the expression of stationary phase and stress-response genes. sigma(S) is also required for the transcription of the cryptic genes csgBA that encode the subunits of the curli proteins. The expression of the csgBA genes is regulated in response to a multitude of physiological signals. In stationary phase, these genes are transcribed by the sigma(S) factor, and expression of the operon is enhanced by the small protein Crl. It has been shown that Crl stimulates the activity of sigma(S), leading to an increased transcription rate of a subset of genes of the rpoS regulon in stationary phase. However, the underlying molecular mechanism has remained elusive. We show here that Crl interacts directly with sigma(S) and that this interaction promotes binding of the sigma(S) holoenzyme (Esigma(S)) to the csgBA promoter. Expression of Crl is increased during the transition from growing to stationary phase. Crl accumulates in stationary phase cells at low temperature (30 degrees C) but not at 37 degrees C. We therefore propose that Crl is a second thermosensor, besides DsrA, controlling sigma(S) activity.

Promoter use by sigma 38 (rpoS) RNA polymerase. Amino acid clusters for DNA binding and isomerization

Sigma(38) is a non-essential but highly homologous member of the sigma(70) family of transcription factors. In vitro mutagenesis and in vivo screening were used to identify 22 critical amino acids in the promoter interaction domain of Escherichia coli sigma(38). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay studies showed that residues involved in duplex DNA binding largely segregated into distinct regions that coincided with those of sigma(70). However, the majority of these amino acids were in non-conserved positions. Analysis indicates that this region of the two sigma(s) probably has a common overall organization but differs in how its amino acids are used to form functional open complexes. Placement of the mutations on the known sigma(70) holoenzyme structure shows two clusters; one appears to be used for duplex DNA recognition and the other for the subsequent isomerization events. Permanganate assays for DNA melting support this view.

Promoter recognition and discrimination by EsigmaS RNA polymerase

Although more than 30 Escherichia coli promoters utilize the RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing sigmaS (EsigmaS), and it is known that there is some overlap between the promoters recognized by EsigmaS and by the major E. coli holoenzyme (Esigma70), the sequence elements responsible for promoter recognition by EsigmaS are not well understood. To define the DNA sequences recognized best by EsigmaS in vitro, we started with random DNA and enriched for EsigmaS promoter sequences by multiple cycles of binding and selection. Surprisingly, the sequences selected by EsigmaS contained the known consensus elements (-10 and -35 hexamers) for recognition by Esigma70. Using genetic and biochemical approaches, we show that EsigmaS and Esigma70 do not achieve specificity through 'best fit' to different consensus promoter hexamers, the way that other forms of holoenzyme limit transcription to discrete sets of promoters. Rather, we suggest that EsigmaS-specific promoters have sequences that differ significantly from the consensus in at least one of the recognition hexamers, and that promoter discrimination against Esigma70 is achieved, at least in part, by the two enzymes tolerating different deviations from consensus. DNA recognition by EsigmaS versus Esigma70 thus presents an alternative solution to the problem of promoter selectivity.

Sigma38 (rpoS) RNA polymerase promoter engagement via -10 region nucleotides

Band shift assays using DNA probes that mimic closed and open complexes were used to explore the determinants of promoter recognition by sigma38 (rpoS) RNA polymerase. Duplex recognition was found to be much weaker than that observed in sigma70 promoter usage. However, binding to fork junction probes, which attempt to mimic melted DNA, was very strong. This binding occurs via the non-template strand with the identity of the two conserved junction nucleotides (-12T and -11A) being of paramount importance. A modified promoter consensus sequence identified these two nucleotides as among only four (underlined) that are highly conserved, and all four were in the -10 region (CTAcacT from -13 to -7). The remaining two nucleotides were shown to have different roles, -13C in preventing recognition by the heterologous sigma70 polymerase and -7T in directing enzyme isomerization. These -10 region nucleotides appear to have their primary function prior to full melting because probes that had a melted start site were relatively insensitive to substitution at these positions. These results suggest the sigma38 mechanism differs from the sigma70 mechanism, and this difference likely contributes to selective use of sigma38 under conditions that exist during stationery phase.

Functional modulation of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

The promoter recognition specificity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is modulated by replacement of the sigma subunit in the first step and by interaction with transcription factors in the second step. The overall differentiated state of approximately 2000 molecules of the RNA polymerase in a single cell can be estimated after measurement of both the intracellular concentrations and the RNA polymerase-binding affinities for all seven species of the sigma subunit and 100-150 transcription factors. The anticipated impact from this line of systematic approach is that the prediction of the expression hierarchy of approximately 4000 genes on the E. coli genome can be estimated.

Competition among seven Escherichia coli sigma subunits: relative binding affinities to the core RNA polymerase

Seven different species of the RNA polymerase sigma subunit exist in Escherichia coli, each binding to a single species of the core enzyme and thereby directing transcription of a specific set of genes. To test the sigma competition model in the global regulation of gene transcription, all seven E.coli sigma subunits have been purified and compared for their binding affinities to the same core RNA polymerase (E). In the presence of a fixed amount of sigma(70), the principal sigma for growth-related genes, the level of Esigma(70) holoenzyme formation increased linearly with the increase in core enzyme level, giving an apparent K:(d) for the core enzyme of 0.26 nM. Mixed reconstitution experiments in the presence of a fixed amount of core enzyme and increasing amounts of an equimolar mixture of all seven sigma subunits indicated that sigma(70) is strongest in terms of core enzyme binding, followed by sigma(N), sigma(F), sigma(E)/sigma(FecI), sigma(H) and sigma(S) in decreasing order. The orders of core binding affinity between sigma(70) and sigma(N) and between sigma(70) and sigma(H) were confirmed by measuring the replacement of one core-associated sigma by another sigma subunit. Taken together with the intracellular sigma levels, we tried to estimate the number of each holoenzyme form in growing E. coli cells.

Transcriptional organization and in vivo role of the Escherichia coli rsd gene, encoding the regulator of RNA polymerase sigma D

The regulator of sigma D (Rsd) was identified as an RNA polymerase sigma70-associated protein in stationary-phase Escherichia coli with the inhibitory activity of sigma70-dependent transcription in vitro (M. Jishage and A. Ishihama, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:4953-4958, 1998). Primer extension analysis of rsd mRNA indicated the presence of two promoters, sigmaS-dependent P1 and sigma70-dependent P2 with the gearbox sequence. To get insight into the in vivo role of Rsd, the expression of a reporter gene fused to either the sigma70- or sigmaS-dependent promoter was analyzed in the absence of Rsd or the presence of overexpressed Rsd. In the rsd null mutant, the sigma70- and sigmaS-dependent gene expression was increased or decreased, respectively. On the other hand, the sigma70- or sigmaS-dependent transcription was reduced or enhanced, respectively, after overexpression of Rsd. The repression of the sigmaS-dependent transcription in the rsd mutant is overcome by increased production of the sigmaS subunit. Together these observations support the prediction that Rsd is involved in replacement of the RNA polymerase sigma subunit from sigma70 to sigmaS during the transition from exponential growth to the stationary phase.

Interplay of global regulators and cell physiology in the general stress response of Escherichia coli

Under various stress conditions, two sigma subunits of RNA polymerase, sigmaS and sigma70, coexist in Escherichia coli cells. In contrast to sigma70, sigmaS is subject to intricate regulation and coordinates an emergency reaction to stress as well as long term stress adaptation. In vivo, the two sigma factors clearly control different genes. Yet, they are structurally and functionally very similar and basically recognize the same promoter sequences. Recent data suggest that sigma factor specificity at stress-activated promoters is affected by the interplay of the two RNA polymeraseholoenzymes with additional regulatory factors, such as H-NS, Lrp, CRP, IHF or Fis, that differentially affect transcription initiation by sigmaS or sigma70 in a promoter-specific manner.

Modulation of the nucleoid, the transcription apparatus, and the translation machinery in bacteria for stationary phase survival

Upon sensing an impending saturation level of their population density, Escherichia coli cells enter into the stationary phase. We have identified structural and functional modulations of the nucleoid, the transcription apparatus and the translation machinery occurring during the transition from exponential growth to stationary phase. The major DNA-binding proteins, Fis, HU and Hfq, in the exponential-phase nucleoid are replaced by a single stationary-phase protein Dps, thereby compacting the nucleoid and ultimately leading to silencing of the DNA functions. The transcription apparatus is modified by replacing the major promoter recognition subunit, sigma70, with sigmaS. A stationary-phase protein, Rsd (Regulator of Sigma D), with the binding activity of sigma70 is involved in the efficient replacement of sigma and/or the storage of unused sigma70. Changes in cytoplasmic composition also differentially influence the activity of Esigma70 and EsigmaS holoenzymes. Together, these effects may result in the preferential transcription of stationary-phase specific genes. The translation machinery is also modulated in stationary phase, by the formation of translationally incompetent 100S ribosomes. A small stationary-phase protein, RMF (Ribosome Modulation Factor), is involved in the dimerization of 70S ribosome monomers.

Bacterial gene products in response to near-ultraviolet radiation

Our research has focused on bacterial gene products that protect cells from damage by near-ultraviolet radiation (near-UV) including gene products involved in the subsequent recovery process. Protective gene products include such anti-oxidants as catalases, superoxide dismutases and glutathione reductase. Near-UV damage recovery products include exonuclease III and DNA-glycosylases. Perhaps more critical than the products of structural genes are certain regulatory gene products that are triggered upon excess near-UV oxidation and lead to synthesis of entire batteries of anti-oxidant enzymes, DNA repair enzymes, and DNA-integrity proteins. Our recent experiments have focused on RpoS and its interaction with OxyR, two proteins that regulate the synthesis of molecules that protect cells from near-UV and other oxidative stresses.

Negative regulation by RpoS: a case of sigma factor competition

A mutation in the Escherichia coli gene encoding the stationary phase-inducible sigma factor (sigmaS, RpoS) not only abolishes transcription of some genes in stationary phase, but also causes superinduction of other stationary phase-induced genes. We have examined this phenomenon of repression by sigmaS using as a model system the divergently transcribed stationary phase-inducible genes, uspA and uspB. uspA is transcribed by sigma70-programmed RNA polymerase and is superinduced in an rpoS mutant, while uspB induction is sigmaS dependent. The data suggest that the superinduction of uspA is caused by an increased amount of sigma70 bound to RNA polymerase in the absence of the competing sigmaS. Increasing the ability of sigma70 to compete against sigmaS by overproducing sigma70 mimics the effect of an rpoS mutation by causing superinduction of sigma70-dependent stationary phase-inducible genes (uspA and fadD), silencing of sigmaS-dependent genes (uspB, bolAp1 and fadL) and inhibiting the development of sigmaS-dependent phenotypes, such as hydrogen peroxide resistance in stationary phase. In addition, overproduction of sigmaS markedly reduced stationary phase expression of a sigma70-dependent promoter. Thus, we conclude that sigma factors compete for a limiting amount of RNA polymerase during stationary phase. The implications of this competition in the passive control of promoter activity is discussed.

Expression systems and physiological control of promoter activity in bacteria

Promoter activity in vivo is not just dependent on the performance of the regulator/promoter pair which may predominantly control transcription initiation in response to a given signal, it also relies on overimposed mechanisms that connect the activity of individual promoters to the metabolic and energetic status of the bacterial cells. Such mechanisms - which frequently become limiting for biotechnological applications involving regulated promoters - include classic (i.e. cAMP/CRP-mediated) or alternative catabolite control checks, recruitment of protein intermediates of the phosphotransferase sugar transport system, coregulation through protein-induced DNA bending and the interplay of sigma factors during various growth stages.

Stationary phase induction of dnaN and recF, two genes of Escherichia coli involved in DNA replication and repair

The beta subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, the Escherichia coli chromosomal replicase, is a sliding DNA clamp responsible for tethering the polymerase to DNA and endowing it with high processivity. The gene encoding beta, dnaN, maps between dnaA and recF, which are involved in initiation of DNA replication at oriC and resumption of DNA replication at disrupted replication forks, respectively. In exponentially growing cells, dnaN and recF are expressed predominantly from the dnaA promoters. However, we have found that stationary phase induction of the dnaN promoters drastically changes the expression pattern of the dnaA operon genes. As a striking consequence, synthesis of the beta subunit and RecF protein increases when cell metabolism is slowing down. Such an induction is dependent on the stationary phase sigma factor, RpoS, although the accumulation of this factor alone is not sufficient to activate the dnaN promoters. These promoters are located in DNA regions without static bending, and the -35 hexamer element is essential for their RpoS-dependent induction. Our results suggest that stationary phase-dependent mechanisms have evolved in order to coordinate expression of dnaN and recF independently of the dnaA regulatory region. These mechanisms might be part of a developmental programme aimed at maintaining DNA integrity under stress conditions.

Trehalose is not relevant for in vivo activity of sigmaS-containing RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli

The sigmaS- and sigma70-associated forms of RNA polymerase core enzyme (E) of Escherichia coli have very similar promoter recognition specificities in vitro. Nevertheless, the in vivo expression of many stress response genes is strongly dependent on sigmaS. Based on in vitro assays, it has recently been proposed that the disaccharide trehalose specifically stimulates the formation and activity of EsigmaS and thereby contributes to promoter selectivity (S. Kusano and A. Ishihama, J. Bacteriol. 179:3649-3654, 1997). However, we demonstrate here that a trehalose-free otsA mutant exhibits growth phase-related and osmotic induction of various sigmaS-dependent genes which is indistinguishable from that of an otherwise isogenic wild-type strain and that stationary-phase cells do not accumulate trehalose (even though the trehalose-synthesizing enzymes are induced). We conclude that in vivo trehalose does not play a role in the expression of sigmaS-dependent genes and therefore also not in sigma factor selectivity at the promoters of these genes.

Adaptation of gene expression in stationary phase bacteria

In nature, bacteria can survive for long periods in non-growing stationary states. Some species of bacteria survive by forming spores but non-spore-forming bacteria, including Escherichia coli, survive in the stationary phase. Gross changes in morphology and physiology occur in the stationary-phase bacteria and concomitantly a state of increased resistance against various stresses is established. The stationary-phase adaptation of E. coli has only recently begun to be investigated at the molecular level.