Catabolite gene activator protein mutations affecting activity of the araBAD promoter

Gauging Dynamics-driven Allostery Using a New Computational Tool: A CAP Case Study

In this study, we utilize Protein Residue Networks (PRNs), constructed using Local Spatial Pattern (LSP) alignment, to explore the dynamic behavior of Catabolite Activator Protein (CAP) upon the sequential binding of cAMP. We employed the Degree Centrality of these PRNs to investigate protein dynamics on a sub-nanosecond time scale, hypothesizing that it would reflect changes in CAP's entropy related to its thermal motions. We show that the binding of the first cAMP led to an increase in stability in the Cyclic-Nucleotide Binding Domain A (CNBD-A) and destabilization in CNBD-B, agreeing with previous reports explaining the negative cooperativity of cAMP binding in terms of an entropy-driven allostery. LSP-based PRNs also allow for the study of Betweenness Centrality, another graph-theoretical characteristic of PRNs, providing insights into global residue connectivity within CAP. Using this approach, we were able to correctly identify amino acids that were shown to be critical in mediating allosteric interactions in CAP. The agreement between our studies and previous experimental reports validates our method, particularly with respect to the reliability of Degree Centrality as a proxy for entropy related to protein thermal dynamics. Because LSP-based PRNs can be easily extended to include dynamics of small organic molecules, polynucleotides, or other allosteric proteins, the methods presented here mark a significant advancement in the field, positioning them as vital tools for a fast, cost-effective, and accurate analysis of entropy-driven allostery and identification of allosteric hotspots.

Characterization of Bacterial Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Escherichia coli through Genome-Wide In Vitro Run-Off Transcription/RNA-seq (ROSE)

The global characterization of transcriptional regulatory networks almost exclusively uses in vivo conditions, thereby providing a snapshot on multiple regulatory interactions at the same time. To complement these approaches, we developed and applied a method for characterizing bacterial promoters genome-wide by in vitro transcription coupled to transcriptome sequencing specific for native 5'-ends of transcripts. This method, called ROSE (run-off transcription/RNA-sequencing), only requires chromosomal DNA, ribonucleotides, RNA polymerase (RNAP) core enzyme, and a specific sigma factor, recognizing the corresponding promoters, which have to be analyzed. ROSE was performed on E. coli K-12 MG1655 genomic DNA using Escherichia coli RNAP holoenzyme (including σ70) and yielded 3226 transcription start sites, 2167 of which were also identified in in vivo studies, and 598 were new. Many new promoters not yet identified by in vivo experiments might be repressed under the tested conditions. Complementary in vivo experiments with E. coli K-12 strain BW25113 and isogenic transcription factor gene knockout mutants of fis, fur, and hns were used to test this hypothesis. Comparative transcriptome analysis demonstrated that ROSE could identify bona fide promoters that were apparently repressed in vivo. In this sense, ROSE is well-suited as a bottom-up approach for characterizing transcriptional networks in bacteria and ideally complementary to top-down in vivo transcriptome studies.

Atomic force microscopy measurements and model of DNA bending caused by binding of AraC protein

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to conduct single-molecule imaging of protein/DNA complexes involved in the regulation of the arabinose operon of Escherichia coli. In the presence of arabinose, the transcription regulatory protein AraC binds to a 38 bp region consisting of the araI1 and araI2 half-sites. The domain positioning of full-length AraC, when bound to DNA, was not previously known. In this study, AraC was combined with 302 and 560 bp DNA and arabinose, deposited on a mica substrate, and imaged with AFM in air. High resolution images of 560 bp DNA, where bound protein was visible, showed that AraC induces a bend in the DNA with an angle 60° ± 12° with a median of 55°. These results are consistent with earlier gel electrophoresis measurements that measured the DNA bend angle based on migration rates. By using known domain structures of AraC, geometric constraints, and contacts determined from biochemical experiments, we developed a model of the tertiary and quaternary structure of DNA-bound AraC in the presence of arabinose. The DNA bend angle predicted by the model is in agreement with the measurement values. We discuss the results in view of other regulatory proteins that cause DNA bending and formation of the open complex to initiate transcription.

Evolution of Regulated Transcription

The genomes of all organisms abound with various cis-regulatory elements, which control gene activity. Transcriptional enhancers are a key group of such elements in eukaryotes and are DNA regions that form physical contacts with gene promoters and precisely orchestrate gene expression programs. Here, we follow gradual evolution of this regulatory system and discuss its features in different organisms. In eubacteria, an enhancer-like element is often a single regulatory element, is usually proximal to the core promoter, and is occupied by one or a few activators. Activation of gene expression in archaea is accompanied by the recruitment of an activator to several enhancer-like sites in the upstream promoter region. In eukaryotes, activation of expression is accompanied by the recruitment of activators to multiple enhancers, which may be distant from the core promoter, and the activators act through coactivators. The role of the general DNA architecture in transcription control increases in evolution. As a whole, it can be seen that enhancers of multicellular eukaryotes evolved from the corresponding prototypic enhancer-like regulatory elements with the gradually increasing genome size of organisms.

Combining genotype improvement and statistical media optimization for isoprenoid production in E. coli

Isoprenoids are a large and diverse class of compounds that includes many high value natural products and are thus in great demand. To meet the increasing demand for isoprenoid compounds, metabolic engineering of microbes has been used to produce isoprenoids in an economical and sustainable manner. To achieve high isoprenoid yields using this technology, the availability of metabolic precursors feeding the deoxyxylulose phosphate (DXP) pathway, responsible for isoprenoid biosynthesis, has to be optimized. In this study, phosphoenolpyruvate, a vital DXP pathway precursor, was enriched by deleting the genes encoding the carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS) in E. coli. Production of lycopene (a C40 isoprenoid) was maximized by optimizing growth medium and culture conditions. In optimized conditions, the lycopene yield from PTS mutant was seven fold higher than that obtained from the wild type strain. This resulted in the highest reported specific yield of lycopene produced from the DXP pathway in E. coli to date (20,000 µg/g dry cell weight). Both the copy number of the plasmid encoding the lycopene biosynthetic genes and the expression were found to be increased in the optimized media. Deletion of PTS together with a similar optimization strategy was also successful in enhancing the production of amorpha-1,4-diene, a distinct C15 isoprenoid, suggesting that the approaches developed herein can be generally applied to optimize production of other isoprenoids.

Simultaneous utilization of glucose, xylose and arabinose in the presence of acetate by a consortium of Escherichia coli strains

Background

The efficient microbial utilization of lignocellulosic hydrolysates has remained challenging because this material is composed of multiple sugars and also contains growth inhibitors such as acetic acid (acetate). Using an engineered consortium of strains derived from Escherichia coli C and a synthetic medium containing acetate, glucose, xylose and arabinose, we report on both the microbial removal of acetate and the subsequent simultaneous utilization of the sugars.

Results

In a first stage, a strain unable to utilize glucose, xylose and arabinose (ALS1392, strain E. coli C ptsG manZ glk crr xylA araA) removed 3 g/L acetate within 30 hours. In a subsequent second stage, three E. coli strains (ALS1370, ALS1371, ALS1391), which are each engineered to utilize only one sugar, together simultaneously utilized glucose, xylose and arabinose. The effect of non-metabolizable sugars on the metabolism of the target sugar was minimal. Additionally the deletions necessary to prevent the consumption of one sugar only minimally affected the consumption of a desired sugar. For example, the crr deletion necessary to prevent glucose consumption reduced xylose and arabinose utilization by less than 15% compared to the wild-type. Similarly, the araA deletion used to exclude arabinose consumption did not affect xylose- and glucose-consumption.

Conclusions

Despite the modest reduction in the overall rate of sugar consumption due to the various deletions that were required to generate the consortium of strains, the approach constitutes a significant improvement in any single-organism approach to utilize sugars found in lignocellulosic hydrolysate in the presence of acetate.

The TonB3 system in the human pathogen Vibrio vulnificus is under the control of the global regulators Lrp and cyclic AMP receptor protein

TonB systems transduce the proton motive force of the cytoplasmic membrane to energize substrate transport through a specific TonB-dependent transporter across the outer membrane. Vibrio vulnificus, an opportunistic marine pathogen that can cause a fatal septicemic disease in humans and eels, possesses three TonB systems. While the TonB1 and TonB2 systems are iron regulated, the TonB3 system is induced when the bacterium grows in human serum. In this work we have determined the essential roles of the leucine-responsive protein (Lrp) and cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (CRP) in the transcriptional activation of this system. Whereas Lrp shows at least four very distinctive DNA binding regions spread out from position -59 to -509, cAMP-CRP binds exclusively in a region centered at position -122.5 from the start point of the transcription. Our results suggest that both proteins bind simultaneously to the region closer to the RNA polymerase binding site. Importantly, we report that the TonB3 system is induced not only by serum but also during growth in minimal medium with glycerol as the sole carbon source and low concentrations of Casamino Acids. In addition to catabolite repression by glucose, l-leucine acts by inhibiting the binding of Lrp to the promoter region, hence preventing transcription of the TonB3 operon. Thus, this TonB system is under the direct control of two global regulators that can integrate different environmental signals (i.e., glucose starvation and the transition between "feast" and "famine"). These results shed light on new mechanisms of regulation for a TonB system that could be widespread in other organisms.

Active role of the interdomain linker of AraC

Mutations in the interdomain linker of the gene for the AraC regulatory protein of Escherichia coli that severely interfere with the protein's ability either to repress or to activate transcription have been found. These mutations have relatively small effects on the dimerization domain's ability to bind arabinose or to dimerize the protein or on the DNA-binding domain's affinity for a single DNA half-site. The linker mutations, however, dramatically change the affinity of AraC for binding to two direct-repeat DNA half-sites. Less dramatically, the induction-deficient linker variants also display altered DNA sequence selectivity. These results show that changing the sequence of the interdomain linker can profoundly affect the dimerization domain-DNA-binding domain interactions in AraC. The smaller effects on the functions of the individual domains could be the direct result of the linker alterations but more likely are the indirect result of the altered dimerization domain-DNA-binding domain interactions. In summary, the linker does not simply function as a passive and flexible connector between the domains of AraC but, instead, is more directly involved in the protein's dimerization domain-DNA-binding domain interactions.

Integration of transcriptional inputs at promoters of the arabinose catabolic pathway

BACKGROUND

Most modelling efforts of transcriptional networks involve estimations of in vivo concentrations of components, binding affinities and reaction rates, derived from in vitro biochemical assays. These assays are difficult and in vitro measurements may not approximate actual in vivo conditions. Alternatively, changes in transcription factor activity can be estimated by using partially specified models which estimate the "hidden functions" of transcription factor concentration changes; however, non-unique solutions are a potential problem. We have applied a synthetic biology approach to develop reporters that are capable of measuring transcription factor activity in vivo in real time. These synthetic reporters are comprised of a constitutive promoter with an operator site for the specific transcription factor immediately downstream. Thus, increasing transcription factor activity is measured as repression of expression of the transcription factor reporter. Measuring repression instead of activation avoids the complications of non-linear interactions between the transcription factor and RNA polymerase which differs at each promoter.

RESULTS

Using these reporters, we show that a simple model is capable of determining the rules of integration for multiple transcriptional inputs at the four promoters of the arabinose catabolic pathway. Furthermore, we show that despite the complex and non-linear changes in cAMP-CRP activity in vivo during diauxic shift, the synthetic transcription factor reporters are capable of measuring real-time changes in transcription factor activity, and the simple model is capable of predicting the dynamic behaviour of the catabolic promoters.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a synthetic biology approach we show that the in vivo activity of transcription factors can be quantified without the need for measuring intracellular concentrations, binding affinities and reaction rates. Using measured transcription factor activity we show how different promoters can integrate common transcriptional inputs, resulting in distinct expression patterns. The data collected show that cAMP levels in vivo are dynamic and agree with observations showing that cAMP levels show a transient pulse during diauxic shift.

AraC protein, regulation of the l-arabinose operon in Escherichia coli, and the light switch mechanism of AraC action

This review covers the physiological aspects of regulation of the arabinose operon in Escherichia coli and the physical and regulatory properties of the operon's controlling gene, araC. It also describes the light switch mechanism as an explanation for many of the protein's properties. Although many thousands of homologs of AraC exist and regulate many diverse operons in response to many different inducers or physiological states, homologs that regulate arabinose-catabolizing genes in response to arabinose were identified. The sequence similarities among them are discussed in light of the known structure of the dimerization and DNA-binding domains of AraC.

The AraC/XylS family activator RhaS negatively autoregulates rhaSR expression by preventing cyclic AMP receptor protein activation

The Escherichia coli RhaR protein activates expression of the rhaSR operon in the presence of its effector, L-rhamnose. The resulting RhaS protein (plus L-rhamnose) activates expression of the L-rhamnose catabolic and transport operons, rhaBAD and rhaT, respectively. Here, we further investigated our previous finding that rhaS deletion resulted in a threefold increase in rhaSR promoter activity, suggesting RhaS negative autoregulation of rhaSR. We found that RhaS autoregulation required the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) binding site at rhaSR and that RhaS was able to bind to the RhaR binding site at rhaSR. In contrast to the expected repression, we found that in the absence of both RhaR and the CRP binding site at the rhaSR promoter, RhaS activated expression to a level comparable with RhaR activation of the same promoter. However, when the promoter included the RhaR and CRP binding sites, the level of activation by RhaS and CRP was much lower than that by RhaR and CRP, suggesting that CRP could not fully coactivate with RhaS. Taken together, our results indicate that RhaS negative autoregulation involves RhaS competition with RhaR for binding to the RhaR binding site at rhaSR. Although RhaS and RhaR activate rhaSR transcription to similar levels, CRP cannot effectively coactivate with RhaS. Therefore, once RhaS reaches a relatively high protein concentration, presumably sufficient to saturate the RhaS-activated promoters, there will be a decrease in rhaSR transcription. We propose a model in which differential DNA bending by RhaS and RhaR may be the basis for the difference in CRP coactivation.

Improving the yield of soluble 6xHis-tagged interferon-alpha via the addition of repressor of the araBAD promoter system in Escherichia coli

The inhibition of inclusion body formation in Escherichia coli by the addition of alpha-D-glucopyranoside or D-fucose after induction improved the purification yield of soluble recombinant interferon-alpha. When D-fucose was added after induction, more soluble 6xHis-tagged interferon-alpha could be purified compared to when methyl alpha-D-glucopyranoside was added. It was shown that, on the basis of 1 mg dry cell weight, 16.6 microg of soluble 6xHis-tagged interferon-alpha was purified when D-fucose was added after induction and 6 ml nickel-chelated agarose gel column was used. This was about 15 times greater than when induction only was performed and 1 ml nickel-chelated agarose gel was used.

Methyl alpha-D-glucopyranoside enhances the enzymatic activity of recombinant beta-galactosidase inclusion bodies in the araBAD promoter system of Escherichia coli

In this study, we utilized a catabolite repressor to improve the enzymatic activity of recombinant beta-galactosidase inclusion bodies (IBs) produced in Escherichia coli under the araBAD promoter system. Specifically, we employed methyl alpha-D: -glucopyranoside (alpha-MG) to lower the transcription rate of the beta-galactosidase structural gene. In deepwell microtiter plate and lab-scale fermentor culture systems, we demonstrated that the addition of alpha-MG after induction improved the specific beta-galactosidase production, even though beta-galactosidase was still produced as an IB. Particularly, the addition of 0.0025% alpha-MG led to the most significant increase in the specific activity of the beta-galactosidase. Interestingly, the beta-galactosidase IBs obtained in the presence of 0.0025% alpha-MG were more loosely packed, as determined by IB solubilization in guanidine hydrochloride solution. We propose that the reduced gene transcription rate was responsible for the increased specific beta-galactosidase activity and the loose packing that characterized the IBs produced in the presence of alpha-MG. This principle could be applied throughout the enzyme bioprocessing industry in order to enhance the activity of aggregate-prone enzymes within IBs.

When coupled to natural transformation in Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1, PCR mutagenesis is made less random by mismatch repair

Random PCR mutagenesis is a powerful tool for structure-function analysis of targeted proteins, especially when coupled with DNA integration through natural transformation followed by selection for loss of function. The technique has been applied successfully to structure-function analysis of transcriptional regulators, enzymes, and transporters in Acinetobacter sp. strain ADP1. However, the mismatch repair system prevents the full spectrum of nucleotide substitutions that may be selected at the level of protein function from being recovered. This barrier may be overcome by introducing PCR-mutagenized genes into strains in which the corresponding genes have been deleted.

Cyclic AMP receptor protein and RhaR synergistically activate transcription from the L-rhamnose-responsive rhaSR promoter in Escherichia coli

The Escherichia coli rhaSR operon encodes two AraC family transcription activator proteins, RhaS and RhaR, which regulate expression of the l-rhamnose catabolic regulon in response to l-rhamnose availability. RhaR positively regulates rhaSR in response to l-rhamnose, and RhaR activation can be enhanced by the cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (CRP) protein. CRP is a well-studied global transcription regulator that binds to DNA as a dimer and activates transcription in the presence of cAMP. We investigated the mechanism of CRP activation at rhaSR both alone and in combination with RhaR in vivo and in vitro. Base pair substitutions at potential CRP binding sites in the rhaSR-rhaBAD intergenic region demonstrate that CRP site 3, centered at position -111.5 relative to the rhaSR transcription start site, is required for the majority of the CRP-dependent activation of rhaSR. DNase I footprinting confirms that CRP binds to site 3; CRP binding to the other potential CRP sites at rhaSR was not detected. We show that, at least in vitro, CRP is capable of both RhaR-dependent and RhaR-independent activation of rhaSR from a total of three transcription start sites. In vitro transcription assays indicate that the carboxy-terminal domain of the alpha subunit (alpha-CTD) of RNA polymerase is at least partially dispensable for RhaR-dependent activation but that the alpha-CTD is required for CRP activation of rhaSR. Although CRP requires the presence of RhaR for efficient in vivo activation of rhaSR, DNase I footprinting assays indicated that cooperative binding between RhaR and CRP does not make a significant contribution to the mechanism of CRP activation at rhaSR. It therefore appears that CRP activates transcription from rhaSR as it would at simple class I promoters, albeit from a relatively distant position.

Leucines 193 and 194 at the N-terminal domain of the XylS protein, the positive transcriptional regulator of the TOL meta-cleavage pathway, are involved in dimerization

Members of the AraC/XylS family of transcriptional regulators are usually organized in two domains: a conserved domain made up of 100 amino acids and frequently located at the C-terminal end, involved in DNA binding; and an N-terminal nonconserved domain involved in signal recognition, as is the case for regulators involved in the control of carbon metabolism (R. Tobes and J. L. Ramos, Nucleic Acids Res. 30:318-321, 2002). The XylS protein, which is extremely insoluble, controls expression of the meta-cleavage pathway for alkylbenzoate metabolism. We fused the N-terminal end of XylS to the maltose-binding protein (MBP) in vitro and found in glutaraldehyde cross-linking assays that the protein dimerized. Experiments with a chimeric N-terminal XylS linked to a 'LexA protein showed that the dimer was stabilized in the presence of alkylbenzoates. Sequence alignments with AraC and UreR allowed us to identify three residues, Leu193, Leu194, and Ile205, as potentially being involved in dimerization. Site-directed mutagenesis of XylS in which each of the above residues was replaced with Ala revealed that Leu193 and Leu194 were critical for activity and that a chimera in which LexA was linked to the N terminus of XylSLeu193Ala or XylSLeu194Ala was not functional. Dimerization of the chimeras MBP-N-XylSLeu193Ala and MBP-N-XylSLeu194Ala was not observed in cross-linking assays with glutaraldehyde.

DNA binding of the transcription activator protein MelR from Escherichia coli and its C-terminal domain

MelR is an Escherichia coli transcription factor belonging to the AraC family. It activates expression of the melAB operon in response to melibiose. Full-length MelR (MelR303) binds to two pairs of sites upstream of the melAB transcription start site, denoted sites 1' and 1 and sites 2 and 2', and to a fifth site, R, which overlaps the divergent melR promoter. The C-terminal domain of MelR (MelR173) does not activate transcription. Here we show that, like MelR303, when MelR173 binds to sites 1 and 2 it recruits CRP to bind between these sites. Hence, the C-terminal domain is involved in heterologous interactions. MelR173 binds to the R site, which has 11 of 18 bp identical to sites 1 and 2 but, surprisingly, does not bind to site 1', which has 12 of 18 bp identical, nor to site 2'. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we show that the binding of MelR303 to sites 1' and 2' is due to cooperative binding with the adjacent site. This homologous cooperativity requires the N-terminal domain of the protein. Activation of the melAB promoter requires MelR to occupy site 2', which overlaps the -35 hexamer. Hence, both domains of MelR are required for transcription activation.

Allosteric regulation of the cAMP receptor protein

The cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) of Escherichia coli is a dimer made up of identical subunits. Each CRP subunit contains a cyclic nucleotide binding pocket and the CRP dimer exhibits negative cooperativity in binding cAMP. In solutions containing cAMP, CRP undergoes sequential conformation changes from the inactive apo-form through the active CRP:(cAMP)(1) complex to the less active CRP:(cAMP)(2) complex depending on the cAMP concentration. Apo-CRP binds DNA with low affinity and no apparent sequence specificity. The CRP:(cAMP)(1) complex exhibits high affinity, sequence-specific DNA binding and interacts with RNA polymerase, whether free in solution or complexed with DNA. The results of genetic, biochemical and biophysical studies have helped to uncover many of the details of cAMP-mediated allosteric control over CRP conformation and activity as a transcription factor. These studies indicate that cAMP binding produces only small, but significant, changes in CRP structure; changes that include subunit realignment and concerted motion of the secondary structure elements within the C-terminal DNA binding domain of each subunit. These adjustments promote CRP surface-patch interaction with RNA polymerase and protrusion of the F-helix to promote CRP site-specific interaction with DNA. Interactions between CRP and RNA polymerase at CRP-dependent promoters produce active ternary transcription complexes.

Mapping arm-DNA-binding domain interactions in AraC

AraC protein, the regulator of the l-arabinose operon in Escherichia coli has been postulated to function by a light switch mechanism. According to this mechanism, it should be possible to find mutations in the DNA-binding domain of AraC that result in weaker arm-DNA-binding domain interactions and which make the protein constitutive, that is, it no longer requires arabinose to activate transcription. We isolated such mutations by randomizing three contiguous leucine residues in the DNA-binding domain, and then by systematically scanning surface residues of the DNA-binding domain with alanine and glutamic acid. As a result, a total of 20 constitutive mutations were found at ten different positions. They form a contiguous trail on the DNA-distal face of the DNA-binding domain, and likely define the region where the N-terminal arm that extends from the N-terminal dimerization domain contacts the C-terminal DNA-binding domain.

The essential role of the promoter-proximal subunit of CAP in pap phase variation: Lrp- and helical phase-dependent activation of papBA transcription by CAP from -215

Catabolite gene activator protein (CAP) is essential for the expression of Pap pili by uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Both in vitro and in vivo analyses indicate that binding of cAMP-CAP centred at 215.5 bp upstream of the papBA promoter is essential for activation of transcription. CAP-dependent activation of papBA requires binding of the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) at binding sites that extend from -180 to -149 relative to the start site of papBA. Our data indicate that CAP and Lrp bind independently to their respective pap DNA sites. Activation of papBA transcription was eliminated by mutations in the activating region 1 (AR1) of CAP, but not in the AR2 region, similar to class I CAP-dependent promoters. Also, like class I promoters, the C-terminal domain of the alpha-subunit of RNA polymerase appears to play a role in transcription activation. Moreover, phase variation is strictly dependent upon the helical phase of the CAP DNA binding site with respect to the papBA transcription start site. Using an 'oriented heterodimer' approach with wild-type and AR1 mutant CAPs, it was shown that the AR1 region of the CAP subunit proximal to papBA is required for stimulation of papBA transcription, whereas AR1 of the promoter-distal subunit is not. Previously, CAP was hypothesized to activate pap transcription indirectly by disrupting repression mediated by H-NS. The results presented here show that AR1 of the promoter-proximal CAP subunit was required for papBA transcription even in the absence of the histone-like protein H-NS. These results show that the promoter-proximal subunit of CAP, bound 215.5 bp upstream of the papBA transcription start site, plays an active role in stimulating papBA transcription, possibly by interacting with the C-terminal domain of the alpha-subunit of RNA polymerase.

Regulation of the L-arabinose operon of Escherichia coli

Over forty years of research on the L-arabinose operon of Escherichia coli have provided insights into the mechanism of positive regulation of gene activity. This research also discovered DNA looping and the mechanism by which the regulatory protein changes its DNA-binding properties in response to the presence of arabinose. As is frequently seen in focused research on biological subjects, the initial studies were primarily genetic. Subsequently, the genetic approaches were augmented by physiological and then biochemical studies. Now biophysical studies are being conducted at the atomic level, but genetics still has a crucial role in the study of this system.

Interdependence of activation at rhaSR by cyclic AMP receptor protein, the RNA polymerase alpha subunit C-terminal domain, and rhaR

The Escherichia coli rhaSR operon encodes two AraC family transcription activators, RhaS and RhaR, and is activated by RhaR in the presence of L-rhamnose. beta-Galactosidase assays of various rhaS-lacZ promoter fusions combined with mobility shift assays indicated that a cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) site located at -111.5 is also required for full activation of rhaSR expression. To address the mechanisms of activation by CRP and the RNA polymerase alpha-subunit C-terminal domain (alpha-CTD) at rhaSR, we tested the effects of alanine substitutions in CRP activating regions 1 and 2, overexpression of a truncated version of alpha (alpha-Delta235), and alanine substitutions throughout alpha-CTD. We found that DNA-contacting residues in alpha-CTD are required for full activation, and for simplicity, we discuss alpha-CTD as a third activator of rhaSR. CRP and RhaR could each partially activate transcription in the absence of the other two activators, and alpha-CTD was not capable of activation alone. In the case of CRP, this suggests that this activation involves neither an alpha-CTD interaction nor cooperative binding with RhaR, while in the case of RhaR, this suggests the likelihood of direct interactions with core RNA polymerase. We also found that CRP, RhaR, and alpha-CTD each have synergistic effects on activation by the others, suggesting direct or indirect interactions among all three. We have some evidence that the alpha-CTD-CRP and alpha-CTD-RhaR interactions might be direct. The magnitude of the synergistic effects was usually greater with just two activators than with all three, suggesting possible redundancies in the mechanisms of activation by CRP, alpha-CTD, and RhaR.

Synergistic transcription activation: a dual role for CRP in the activation of an Escherichia coli promoter depending on MalT and CRP

Activation of the Escherichia coli malEp promoter relies on the formation of a higher order structure involving cooperative binding of MalT to promoter-proximal and promoter-distal sites as well as CRP binding to three sites located in between. MalT is the primary activator and one function of CRP is to facilitate cooperative binding of MalT to its cognate sites by bending the intervening DNA. It is shown here that CRP also participates directly in malEp activation. This function is carried out by the molecule of CRP bound to the CRP site centered at -139.5 (CRP site 3). This molecule of CRP recruits RNA polymerase by promoting the binding of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit C-terminal domain (alphaCTD) to DNA immediately downstream from CRP site 3, via a contact between alphaCTD and activating region I of CRP. The action of MalT and CRP at malEp hence provides the example of a novel and complex mechanism for transcriptional synergy in prokaryotes whereby one activator both helps the primary activator to form a productive complex with promoter DNA and interacts directly with RNA polymerase holoenzyme.

Recognition of overlapping nucleotides by AraC and the sigma subunit of RNA polymerase

The Escherichia coli promoter p(BAD), under the control of the AraC protein, drives the expression of mRNA encoding the AraB, AraA, and AraD gene products of the arabinose operon. The binding site of AraC at p(BAD) overlaps the RNA polymerase -35 recognition region by 4 bases, leaving 2 bases of the region not contacted by AraC. This overlap raises the question of whether AraC substitutes for the sigma subunit of RNA polymerase in recognition of the -35 region or whether both AraC and sigma make important contacts with the DNA in the -35 region. If sigma does not contact DNA near the -35 region, p(BAD) activity should be independent of the identity of the bases in the hexamer region that are not contacted by AraC. We have examined this issue in the p(BAD) promoter and in a second promoter where the AraC binding site overlaps the -35 region by only 2 bases. In both cases promoter activity is sensitive to changes in bases not contacted by AraC, showing that despite the overlap, sigma does read DNA in the -35 region. Since sigma and AraC are thus closely positioned at p(BAD), it is possible that AraC and sigma contact one another during transcription initiation. DNA migration retardation assays, however, showed that there exists only a slight degree of DNA binding cooperativity between AraC and sigma, thus suggesting either that the normal interactions between AraC and sigma are weak or that the presence of the entire RNA polymerase is necessary for significant interaction.

Roles of cyclic AMP receptor protein and the carboxyl-terminal domain of the alpha subunit in transcription activation of the Escherichia coli rhaBAD operon

The Escherichia coli rhaBAD operon encodes the enzymes for catabolism of the sugar L-rhamnose. Full rhaBAD activation requires the AraC family activator RhaS (bound to a site that overlaps the -35 region of the promoter) and the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP; bound immediately upstream of RhaS at -92.5). We tested alanine substitutions in activating regions (AR) 1 and 2 of CRP for their effect on rhaBAD activation. Some, but not all, of the substitutions in both AR1 and AR2 resulted in approximately twofold defects in expression from rhaBAD promoter fusions. We also expressed a derivative of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase deleted for the entire C-terminal domain (alpha-Delta235) and assayed expression from rhaBAD promoter fusions. The greatest defect (54-fold) occurred at a truncated promoter where RhaS was the only activator, while the defect at the full-length promoter (RhaS plus CRP) was smaller (13-fold). Analysis of a plasmid library expressing alanine substitutions at every residue in the carboxyl-terminal domain of the alpha subunit (alpha-CTD) identified 15 residues (mostly in the DNA-binding determinant) that were important at both the full-length and truncated promoters. Only one substitution was defective at the full-length but not the truncated promoter, and this residue was located in the DNA-binding determinant. Six substitutions were defective only at the promoter activated by RhaS alone, and these may define a protein-contacting determinant on alpha-CTD. Overall, our results suggest that CRP interaction with alpha-CTD may not be required for rhaBAD activation; however, alpha-CTD does contribute to full activation, probably through interactions with DNA and possibly RhaS.

Transcription activation at the Escherichia coli melAB promoter: the role of MelR and the cyclic AMP receptor protein

MelR is a melibiose-triggered transcription activator that belongs to the AraC family of transcription factors. Using purified Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and a cloned DNA fragment carrying the entire melibiose operon intergenic region, we have demonstrated in vitro open complex formation and activation of transcription initiation at the melAB promoter. This activation is dependent on MelR and melibiose. These studies also show that the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) interacts with the melAB promoter and increases MelR-dependent transcription activation. DNAase I footprinting has been exploited to investigate the location of MelR-and CRP-binding sites at the melAB promoter. We showed previously that MelR binds to two identical 18 bp target sequences centred at position -100.5 (Site 1) and position -62.5 (Site 2). In this work, we show that MelR additionally binds to two other related 18 bp sequences: Site 1', centred at position -120.5, located immediately upstream of Site 1, and Site R, at position -238.5, which overlaps the transcription start site of the divergent melR promoter. MelR can bind to Site 1', Site 1, Site 2 and Site R, in both the absence and the presence of melibiose. However, in the presence of melibiose, MelR also binds to a fifth site (Site 2', centred at position -42.5) located immediately downstream of Site 2, and overlapping the -35 region of the melAB promoter. Additionally, although CRP is unable to bind to the melAB promoter in the absence of MelR, in the presence of MelR, it binds to a site located between MelR binding Site 1 and Site 2. Thus, tandem-bound MelR recruits CRP to the MelR. We propose that expression from the melAB promoter has an absolute requirement for MelR binding to Site 2'. Optimal expression of the melAB promoter requires Sites 1', Site 1, Site 2 and Site 2'; CRP acts as a 'bridge' between MelR bound at Sites 1' and 1 and at Sites 2 and 2', increasing expression from the melAB promoter. In support of this model, we show that improvement of the base sequence of Site 2' removes the requirement for Site 1' and Site 1, and short circuits the effects of CRP.

Positive co-regulation of the Escherichia coli carnitine pathway cai and fix operons by CRP and the CaiF activator

Activation of the two divergent Escherichia coli cai and fix operons involved in anaerobic carnitine metabolism is co-dependent on the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) and on CaiF, the specific carnitine-sensitive transcriptional regulator. CaiF was overproduced using a phage T7 system, purified on a heparin column and ran as a 15 kDa protein on SDS-PAGE. DNase I footprinting and interference experiments identified two sites, F1 and F2, with apparently comparable affinities for the binding of CaiF in the cai-fix regulatory region. These sites share a common perfect inverted repeat comprising two 11 bp half-sites separated by 13 bp, and centred at -70 and -127 from the fix transcription start site. They were found to overlap the two low-affinity binding sites, CRP2 and CRP3, determined previously for CRP. Gel shift assays and footprinting experiments suggest that CaiF and CRP bind co-operatively to the F1/CRP2 and F2/CRP3 sites of the intergenic cai-fix region. Moreover, they appeared to serve the simultaneous binding of each other, giving rise to an original multiprotein CRP-CaiF complex enabling RNA polymerase recruitment and local DNA untwisting, at least at the fix promoter. Using random mutagenesis, two CaiF mutants impaired in transcription activation were isolated. The N-terminal A27V mutation affected the structural organization of the activator, whereas the central I62N mutation was suggested to interfere with DNA binding.

Transcription activation by catabolite activator protein (CAP)

Transcription activation by Escherichia coli catabolite activator protein (CAP) at each of two classes of simple CAP-dependent promoters is understood in structural and mechanistic detail. At class I CAP-dependent promoters, CAP activates transcription from a DNA site located upstream of the DNA site for RNA polymerase holoenzyme (RNAP); at these promoters, transcription activation involves protein-protein interactions between CAP and the RNAP alpha subunit C-terminal domain that facilitate binding of RNAP to promoter DNA to form the RNAP-promoter closed complex. At class II CAP-dependent promoters, CAP activates transcription from a DNA site that overlaps the DNA site for RNAP; at these promoters, transcription activation involves both: (i) protein-protein interactions between CAP and RNAP alpha subunit C-terminal domain that facilitate binding of RNAP to promoter DNA to form the RNAP-promoter closed complex; and (ii) protein-protein interactions between CAP and RNAP alpha subunit N-terminal domain that facilitates isomerization of the RNAP-promoter closed complex to the RNAP-promoter open complex. Straightforward combination of the mechanisms for transcription activation at class I and class II CAP-dependent promoters permits synergistic transcription activation by multiple molecules of CAP, or by CAP and other activators. Interference with determinants of CAP or RNAP involved in transcription activation at class I and class II CAP-dependent promoters permits "anti-activation" by negative regulators. Basic features of transcription activation at class I and class II CAP-dependent promoters appear to be generalizable to other activators.

Separate contributions of UhpA and CAP to activation of transcription of the uhpT promoter of Escherichia coli

Activation of promoters by multiple transcription factors might occur through favorable contacts of the activators with themselves or RNA polymerase, or by changes in DNA geometry that enhance formation of the transcription complex. Transcription of the Escherichia coli uhpT gene, encoding the organophosphate transporter, requires the response regulator UhpA and is stimulated by the global regulator protein CAP. CAP binds to the uhpT promoter at a single site, centered at -103.5 bp relative to the start of transcription, and UhpA binds to multiple sites between positions -80 and -32. Overexpression of UhpA did not reduce the degree of CAP stimulation of uhpT-lacZ expression, showing that CAP action is more complex than enhancement of the binding of UhpA. Footprinting experiments demonstrated that UhpA and CAP modestly stimulated each other's binding to the uhpT promoter, but did not affect the positioning of the binding sites. An in vitro transcription system was used to examine the contribution of each transcription factor at the uhpT promoter. Action of UhpA and CAP proteins was not affected by template supercoiling. Kinetic analyses of productive and abortive initiation showed that CAP acted both to stabilize by fivefold the open promoter complexes formed in the presence of UhpA and to enhance by twofold the rate of their formation. These results indicate that open complex formation requires UhpA and that CAP stabilizes the open complex.

Positively regulated expression of the Escherichia coli araBAD promoter in Corynebacterium glutamicum

In Corynebacterium glutamicum the promoter of the araBAD Escherichia coli gene is positively regulated by both arabinose and the araC gene product, as it is the case in the natural host. If the L-arabinose inducer and an active araC gene are present, significant amounts of araBAD promoter expression take place in the absence of the E. coli CRP protein. These results show that the C. glutamicum RNA polymerase is activated by the E. coli positive regulator of transcription AraC.

The cyclic AMP receptor protein is dependent on GcvA for regulation of the gcv operon

The Escherichia coli gcv operon is transcriptionally regulated by the GcvA, GcvR, Lrp, and PurR proteins. In this study, the cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (CRP) is shown to be involved in positive regulation of the gcv operon. A crp deletion reduced expression of a gcvT-lacZ fusion almost fourfold in glucose minimal (GM) medium. The phenotype was complemented by both the wild-type crp gene and four crp alleles that encode proteins with amino acid substitutions in known activating regions of CRP. A cyaA deletion also resulted in a fourfold decrease in gcvT-lacZ expression, and wild-type expression was restored by the addition of cAMP to the growth medium. A cyaA crp double deletion resulted in levels of gcvT-lacZ expression identical to those observed with either single mutation, showing that CRP and cAMP regulate through the same mechanism. Growth in GM medium plus cAMP or glycerol minimal medium did not result in a significant increase in gcvT-lacZ expression. Thus, the level of cAMP present in GM medium appears to be sufficient for regulation by CRP. DNase I footprint analysis showed that CRP binds and protects two sites centered at bp -313 (site 1) and bp -140 (site 2) relative to the transcription initiation site, but a mutational analysis demonstrated that only site 1 is required for CRP-mediated regulation of gcvT-lacZ expression. Expression of the gcvT-lacZ fusion in a crp gcvA double mutant suggested that CRP's role is dependent on the GcvA protein.

DNA bending by AraC: a negative mutant

We sought a mutation in the DNA binding domain of the arabinose operon regulatory protein, AraC, of Escherichia coli that allows the protein to bind DNA normally but not activate transcription. The mutation was isolated by mutagenizing a plasmid overproducing a chimeric leucine zipper-AraC DNA binding domain and screening for proteins that were trans dominant negative with regard to wild-type AraC protein. The mutant with the lowest transcription activation of the araBAD promoter was studied further. It proved to alter a residue that had previously been demonstrated to contact DNA. Because the overproduced mutant protein still bound DNA in vivo, it is deficient in transcription activation for some reason other than absence of DNA binding. Using the phase-sensitive DNA bending assay, we found that wild-type AraC bends DNA about 90 degrees whereas the mutant bends DNA by a smaller amount.

Expression systems and physiological control of promoter activity in bacteria

Promoter activity in vivo is not just dependent on the performance of the regulator/promoter pair which may predominantly control transcription initiation in response to a given signal, it also relies on overimposed mechanisms that connect the activity of individual promoters to the metabolic and energetic status of the bacterial cells. Such mechanisms - which frequently become limiting for biotechnological applications involving regulated promoters - include classic (i.e. cAMP/CRP-mediated) or alternative catabolite control checks, recruitment of protein intermediates of the phosphotransferase sugar transport system, coregulation through protein-induced DNA bending and the interplay of sigma factors during various growth stages.

Arm-domain interactions in AraC

N-terminal deletions extending beyond the sixth amino acid of the Escherichia coli regulator of the l-arabinose operon, AraC, were found to generate constitutive regulatory behavior of the promoter pBAD. Mutagenesis of the DNA coding for the first 20 amino acids of the protein and screening for constitutives yielded mutants across the region whereas screening for mutants that cannot induce pBAD, even in the presence of arabinose, yielded none. These results indicate that the N-terminal arm is not essential for transcription activation, but that it plays an important and active role in holding the system in a non-activating state. Despite the fact that arabinose binds to the N-terminal domain of AraC, mutations were found in the C-terminal domain that weaken the binding of arabinose to the protein. The effects of the mutations could be suppressed by specific mutation in the N-terminal arm or by deletion of the arm. These results, in conjunction with the crystal structures of the N-terminal domain determined in the presence and absence of arabinose, indicate that in the absence of arabinose, the N-terminal arms of the protein bind to the C-terminal DNA binding domains to hold them in a state where the protein prefers to loop. When arabinose is added, the arms are pulled off the C-terminal domains, thereby releasing them to bind to adjacently located DNA half-sites and activate transcription.