Sigma factor displacement from RNA polymerase during Bacillus subtilis sporulation

The σB-Mediated General Stress Response of Listeria monocytogenes: Life and Death Decision Making in a Pathogen

Sensing and responding to environmental cues is critical for the adaptability and success of the food-borne bacterial pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. A supramolecular multi-protein complex known as the stressosome, which acts as a stress sensing hub, is responsible for orchestrating the activation of a signal transduction pathway resulting in the activation of σ^B, the sigma factor that controls the general stress response (GSR). When σ^B is released from the anti-sigma factor RsbW, a rapid up-regulation of the large σ^B regulon, comprised of ≥ 300 genes, ensures that cells respond appropriately to the new environmental conditions. A diversity of stresses including low pH, high osmolarity, and blue light are known to be sensed by the stressosome, resulting in a generalized increase in stress resistance. Appropriate activation of the stressosome and deployment of σ^B are critical to fitness as there is a trade-off between growth and stress protection when the GSR is deployed. We review the recent developments in this field and describe an up-to-date model of how this sensory organelle might integrate environmental signals to produce an appropriate activation of the GSR. Some of the outstanding questions and challenges in this fascinating field are also discussed.

Proteases HtrA and HtrB for α-amylase secreted from Bacillus subtilis in secretion stress

HtrA and HtrB are two important proteases across species. In biotechnological industries, they are related to degradation of secreted heterologous proteins from bacteria, especially in the case of overproduction of α-amylases in Bacillus subtilis. Induction of HtrA and HtrB synthesis follows the overproduction of α-amylases in B. subtilis. This is different from the order usually observed in B. subtilis, i.e., the production of proteases is prior to the secretion of proteins. This discrepancy suggests three possibilities: (i) HtrA and HtrB are constantly synthesized from the end of the exponential phase, and then are synthesized more abundantly due to secretion stress; (ii) There is a hysteresis mechanism that holds HtrA and HtrB back from their large amount of secretion before the overproduction of α-amylases; (iii) Heterologous amylases could be a stress to B. subtilis leading to a general response to stress. In this review, we analyze the literature to explore these three possibilities. The first possibility is attributed to the regulatory pathway of CssR-CssS. The second possibility is because sigma factor σD plays a role in the overproduction of α-amylases and is subpopulation dependent with the switch between "ON" and "OFF" states that is fundamental for a bistable system and a hysteresis mechanism. Thus, sigma factor σD helps to hold HtrA and HtrB back from massive secretion before the overproduction of α-amylases. The third possibility is that several sigma factors promote the secretion of proteases at the end of the exponential phase of growth under the condition that heterologous amylases are considered as a stress.

Spatiotemporally regulated proteolysis to dissect the role of vegetative proteins during Bacillus subtilis sporulation: cell-specific requirement of σH and σA

Sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is a paradigm of bacterial development, which involves the interaction between a larger mother cell and a smaller forespore. The mother cell and the forespore activate different genetic programs, leading to the production of sporulation-specific proteins. A critical gap in our understanding of sporulation is how vegetative proteins, made before sporulation initiation, contribute to spore formation. Here we present a system, spatiotemporally regulated proteolysis (STRP), which enables the rapid, developmentally regulated degradation of target proteins, thereby providing a suitable method to dissect the cell- and developmental stage-specific role of vegetative proteins. STRP has been used to dissect the role of two major vegetative sigma factors, σ^H and σ^A , during sporulation. The results suggest that σ^H is only required in predivisional cells, where it is essential for sporulation initiation, but that it is dispensable during subsequent steps of spore formation. However, evidence has been provided that σ^A plays different roles in the mother cell, where it replenishes housekeeping functions, and in the forespore, where it plays an unexpected role in promoting spore germination and outgrowth. Altogether, the results demonstrate that STRP has the potential to provide a comprehensive molecular dissection of every stage of sporulation, germination and outgrowth.

Insights from the architecture of the bacterial transcription apparatus

We provide a portrait of the bacterial transcription apparatus in light of the data emerging from structural studies, sequence analysis and comparative genomics to bring out important but underappreciated features. We first describe the key structural highlights and evolutionary implications emerging from comparison of the cellular RNA polymerase subunits with the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase involved in RNAi in eukaryotes and their homologs from newly identified bacterial selfish elements. We describe some previously unnoticed domains and the possible evolutionary stages leading to the RNA polymerases of extant life forms. We then present the case for the ancient orthology of the basal transcription factors, the sigma factor and TFIIB, in the bacterial and the archaeo-eukaryotic lineages. We also present a synopsis of the structural and architectural taxonomy of specific transcription factors and their genome-scale demography. In this context, we present certain notable deviations from the otherwise invariant proteome-wide trends in transcription factor distribution and use it to predict the presence of an unusual lineage-specifically expanded signaling system in certain firmicutes like Paenibacillus. We then discuss the intersection between functional properties of transcription factors and the organization of transcriptional networks. Finally, we present some of the interesting evolutionary conundrums posed by our newly gained understanding of the bacterial transcription apparatus and potential areas for future explorations.

The key sigma factor of transition phase, SigH, controls sporulation, metabolism, and virulence factor expression in Clostridium difficile

Toxin synthesis in Clostridium difficile increases as cells enter into stationary phase. We first compared the expression profiles of strain 630E during exponential growth and at the onset of stationary phase and showed that genes involved in sporulation, cellular division, and motility, as well as carbon and amino acid metabolism, were differentially expressed under these conditions. We inactivated the sigH gene, which encodes an alternative sigma factor involved in the transition to post-exponential phase in Bacillus subtilis. Then, we compared the expression profiles of strain 630E and the sigH mutant after 10 h of growth. About 60% of the genes that were differentially expressed between exponential and stationary phases, including genes involved in motility, sporulation, and metabolism, were regulated by SigH, which thus appears to be a key regulator of the transition phase in C. difficile. SigH positively controls several genes required for sporulation. Accordingly, sigH inactivation results in an asporogeneous phenotype. The spo0A and CD2492 genes, encoding the master regulator of sporulation and one of its associated kinases, and the spoIIA operon were transcribed from a SigH-dependent promoter. The expression of tcdA and tcdB, encoding the toxins, and of tcdR, encoding the sigma factor required for toxin production, increased in a sigH mutant. Finally, SigH regulates the expression of genes encoding surface-associated proteins, such as the Cwp66 adhesin, the S-layer precursor, and the flagellum components. Among the 286 genes positively regulated by SigH, about 40 transcriptional units presenting a SigH consensus in their promoter regions are good candidates for direct SigH targets.

A small protein required for the switch from {sigma}F to {sigma}G during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis

A cascade of alternative sigma factors governs the program of developmental gene expression during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Little is known, however, about how the early-acting sigma factors are inactivated and replaced by the later-acting factors. Here we identify a small protein, Fin (formerly known as YabK), that is required for efficient switching from σ(F)- to σ(G)-directed gene expression in the forespore compartment of the developing sporangium. The fin gene, which is conserved among Bacillus species and species of related genera, is transcribed in the forespore under the control of both σ(F) and σ(G). Cells mutant for fin are unable to fully deactivate σ(F) and, conversely, are unable to fully activate σ(G). Consistent with their deficiency in σ(G)-directed gene expression, fin cells are arrested in large numbers following the engulfment stage of sporulation, ultimately forming 50-fold fewer heat-resistant spores than the wild type. Based in part on the similarity of Fin to the anti-σ(G) factor CsfB (also called Gin), we speculate that Fin is an anti-σ(F) factor which, by disabling σ(F), promotes the switch to late developmental gene expression in the forespore.

SpoIIIE strips proteins off the DNA during chromosome translocation

The FtsK/SpoIIIE family of DNA transporters are responsible for translocating missegregated chromosomes after the completion of cell division. An extreme example of this post-cytokinetic DNA segregation occurs during spore formation in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis, where SpoIIIE pumps three-quarters of the chromosome (>3 megabases) into one of the two daughter cells. Here, we investigate the fate of the proteins associated with the translocated DNA. Taking advantage of several unique features of Bacillus sporulation, we demonstrate that RNA polymerase, transcription factors, and chromosome remodeling proteins are stripped off the DNA during translocation of the chromosome into the forespore compartment. Furthermore, we show that in vitro the soluble ATPase domain of SpoIIIE can displace RNA polymerase bound to DNA, suggesting that SpoIIIE alone is capable of this wire-stripping activity. Our data suggest that the bulk of the forespore chromosome is translocated naked into the forespore compartment. We propose that the translocation-stripping activity of SpoIIIE plays a key role in reprogramming developmental gene expression in the forespore.

Intracellular levels and activity of PvdS, the major iron starvation sigma factor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

In Pseudomonas aeruginosa the iron starvation sigma factor PvdS directs the transcription of pyoverdine and virulence genes under iron limitation. PvdS activity is modulated by pyoverdine through the surface signalling cascade involving the FpvA receptor and the inner membrane-spanning sensor FpvR. To gain insight into the molecular mechanisms enabling PvdS to compete with the major sigma RpoD for RNA polymerase (RNAP) binding, we determined the intracellular levels of RNAP, RpoD and PvdS in P. aeruginosa PAO1, and the effect of pyoverdine signalling on PvdS activity. Under iron limitation, P. aeruginosa contains 2221 and 933 molecules of RNAP and RpoD per cell respectively. PvdS attains 62% of RpoD levels. The high PvdS content is partly offset by retention of 30% of PvdS on the membrane, lowering the concentration of cytosolic PvdS to 45% of RpoD levels. RNAP purification from iron-starved P. aeruginosa cells demonstrated that PvdS-RNAP is poorly represented compared with RpoD-RNAP (1 and 27% of total RNAP respectively). Pyoverdine signalling does not affect the PvdS cellular content but facilitates PvdS release from the membrane, increasing its cytosolic concentration from 35% in both pvdF and fpvA signalling mutants to 70% in the wild type and 83% in the fpvR mutant.

Production and secretion stress caused by overexpression of heterologous alpha-amylase leads to inhibition of sporulation and a prolonged motile phase in Bacillus subtilis

Transcriptome analysis was used to investigate the global stress response of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis caused by overproduction of the well-secreted AmyQ alpha-amylase from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Analyses of the control and overproducing strains were carried out at the end of exponential growth and in stationary phase, when protein secretion from B. subtilis is optimal. Among the genes that showed increased expression were htrA and htrB, which are part of the CssRS regulon, which responds to high-level protein secretion and heat stress. The analysis of the transcriptome profiles of a cssS mutant compared to the wild type, under identical secretion stress conditions, revealed several genes with altered transcription in a CssRS-dependent manner, for example, citM, ylxF, yloA, ykoJ, and several genes of the flgB operon. However, high-affinity CssR binding was observed only for htrA, htrB, and, possibly, citM. In addition, the DNA macroarray approach revealed that several genes of the sporulation pathway are downregulated by AmyQ overexpression and that a group of motility-specific (sigmaD-dependent) transcripts were clearly upregulated. Subsequent flow-cytometric analyses demonstrate that, upon overproduction of AmyQ as well as of a nonsecretable variant of the alpha-amylase, the process of sporulation is severely inhibited. Similar experiments were performed to investigate the expression levels of the hag promoter, a well-established reporter for sigmaD-dependent gene expression. This approach confirmed the observations based on our DNA macroarray analyses and led us to conclude that expression levels of several genes involved in motility are maintained at high levels under all conditions of alpha-amylase overproduction.

CcpA causes repression of the phoPR promoter through a novel transcription start site, P(A6)

The Bacillus subtilis PhoPR two-component system is directly responsible for activation or repression of Pho regulon genes in response to phosphate deprivation. The response regulator, PhoP, and the histidine kinase, PhoR, are encoded in a single operon with a complex promoter region that contains five known transcription start sites, which respond to at least two regulatory proteins. We report here the identification of another direct regulator of phoPR transcription, carbon catabolite protein A, CcpA. This regulator functions in the presence of glucose or other readily metabolized carbon sources. The maximum derepression of phoPR expression in a ccpA mutant compared to a wild-type stain was observed under excess phosphate conditions with glucose either throughout growth in a high-phosphate defined medium or in a low-phosphate defined medium during exponential growth, a growth condition when phoPR transcription is low in a wild-type strain due to the absence of autoinduction. Either HPr or Crh were sufficient to cause CcpA dependent repression of the phoPR promoter in vivo. A ptsH1 (Hpr) crh double mutant completely relieves phoPR repression during phosphate starvation but not during phosphate replete growth. In vivo and in vitro studies showed that CcpA repressed phoPR transcription by binding directly to the cre consensus sequence present in the promoter. Primer extension and in vitro transcription studies revealed that the CcpA regulation of phoPR transcription was due to repression of P(A6), a previously unidentified promoter positioned immediately upstream of the cre box. Esigma(A) was sufficient for transcription of P(A6), which was repressed by CcpA in vitro. These studies showed direct repression by CcpA of a newly discovered Esigma(A)-responsive phoPR promoter that required either Hpr or Crh in vivo for direct binding to the putative consensus cre sequence located between P(A6) and the five downstream promoters characterized previously.

Contributions of protein structure and gene position to the compartmentalization of the regulatory proteins sigma(E) and SpoIIE in sporulating Bacillus subtilis

At an early stage in endospore formation Bacillus subtilis partitions itself into two dissimilar compartments with unique developmental fates. Transcription appropriate to each compartment is initiated by the activation of compartment-specific RNA polymerase sigma subunits, sigma(E) in the mother cell and sigma(F) in the forespore. Among the possible factors contributing to the compartment specificity of sigma(E) and sigma(F) is the selective accumulation of the sigma(E) protein in the mother cell and that of SpoIIE, a regulatory phosphatase essential to the activation of sigma(F), in the forespore. In the current work, fluorescent microscopy is used to investigate the contributions of sigma(E) and SpoIIE's protein structures, expression and the genetic asymmetry that develops during chromosome translocation into the forespore on their abundance in each compartment. Time of entry of the spoIIE and sigE genes into the forespore was found to have a significant effect on the enrichment of their products in one or the other compartment. In contrast, the structures of the proteins themselves do not appear to promote their transfer to a particular compartment, but nonetheless contribute to compartmentalization by facilitating degradation in the compartment where each protein's activity would be inappropriate.

Bacillus subtilis phosphorylated PhoP: direct activation of the E(sigma)A- and repression of the E(sigma)E-responsive phoB-PS+V promoters during pho response

The phoB gene of Bacillus subtilis encodes an alkaline phosphatase (PhoB, formerly alkaline phosphatase III) that is expressed from separate promoters during phosphate deprivation in a PhoP-PhoR-dependent manner and at stage two of sporulation under phosphate-sufficient conditions independent of PhoP-PhoR. Isogenic strains containing either the complete phoB promoter or individual phoB promoter fusions were used to assess expression from each promoter under both induction conditions. The phoB promoter responsible for expression during sporulation, phoB-P(S), was expressed in a wild-type strain during phosphate deprivation, but induction occurred >3 h later than induction of Pho regulon genes and the levels were approximately 50-fold lower than that observed for the PhoPR-dependent promoter, phoB-P(V). E(sigma)E was necessary and sufficient for P(S) expression in vitro. P(S) expression in a phoPR mutant strain was delayed 2 to 3 h compared to the expression in a wild-type strain, suggesting that expression or activation of sigma(E) is delayed in a phoPR mutant under phosphate-deficient conditions, an observation consistent with a role for PhoPR in spore development under these conditions. Phosphorylated PhoP (PhoP approximately P) repressed P(S) in vitro via direct binding to the promoter, the first example of an E(sigma)E-responsive promoter that is repressed by PhoP approximately P. Whereas either PhoP or PhoP approximately P in the presence of E(sigma)A was sufficient to stimulate transcription from the phoB-P(V) promoter in vitro, roughly 10- and 17-fold-higher concentrations of PhoP than of PhoP approximately P were required for P(V) promoter activation and maximal promoter activity, respectively. The promoter for a second gene in the Pho regulon, ykoL, was also activated by elevated concentrations of unphosphorylated PhoP in vitro. However, because no Pho regulon gene expression was observed in vivo during P(i)-replete growth and PhoP concentrations increased only threefold in vivo during phoPR autoinduction, a role for unphosphorylated PhoP in Pho regulon activation in vivo is not likely.

Autoinduction of Bacillus subtilis phoPR operon transcription results from enhanced transcription from EsigmaA- and EsigmaE-responsive promoters by phosphorylated PhoP

The phoPR operon encodes a response regulator, PhoP, and a histidine kinase, PhoR, which activate or repress genes of the Bacillus subtilis Pho regulon in response to an extracellular phosphate deficiency. Induction of phoPR upon phosphate starvation required activity of both PhoP and PhoR, suggesting autoregulation of the operon, a suggestion that is supported here by PhoP footprinting on the phoPR promoter. Primer extension analyses, using RNA from JH642 or isogenic sigE or sigB mutants isolated at different stages of growth and/or under different growth conditions, suggested that expression of the phoPR operon represents the sum of five promoters, each responding to a specific growth phase and environmental controls. The temporal expression of the phoPR promoters was investigated using in vitro transcription assays with RNA polymerase holoenzyme isolated at different stages of Pho induction, from JH642 or isogenic sigE or sigB mutants. In vitro transcription studies using reconstituted EsigmaA, EsigmaB, and EsigmaE holoenzymes identified PA4 and PA3 as EsigmaA promoters and PE2 as an EsigmaE promoter. Phosphorylated PhoP (PhoP approximately P) enhanced transcription from each of these promoters. EsigmaB was sufficient for in vitro transcription of the PB1 promoter. P5 was active only in a sigB mutant strain. These studies are the first to report a role for PhoP approximately P in activation of promoters that also have activity in the absence of Pho regulon induction and an activation role for PhoP approximately P at an EsigmaE promoter. Information concerning PB1 and P5 creates a basis for further exploration of the regulatory coordination or overlap of the PhoPR and SigB regulons during phosphate starvation.

Sporulation phenotype of a Bacillus subtilis mutant expressing an unprocessable but active sigmaE transcription factor

SigmaE, a sporulation-specific sigma factor of Bacillus subtilis, is formed from an inactive precursor (pro-sigmaE) by a developmentally regulated processing reaction that removes 27 amino acids from the proprotein's amino terminus. A sigE variant (sigE335) lacking 15 amino acids of the prosequence is not processed into mature sigmaE but is active without processing. In the present work, we investigated the sporulation defect in sigE335-expressing B. subtilis, asking whether it is the bypass of proprotein processing or a residual inhibition of sigmaE activity that is responsible. Fluorescence microscopy demonstrated that sigE335-expressing B. subtilis progresses further into sporulation (stage III) than do strains lacking sigmaE activity (stage II). Consistent with its stage III phenotype, and a defect in sigmaE activity rather than its timing, the sigE335 allele did not disturb early sporulation gene expression but did inhibit the expression of late sporulation genes (gerE and sspE). The Spo- phenotype of sigE335 was found to be recessive to wild-type sigE. In vivo assays of sigmaE activity in sigE, sigE335, and merodiploid strains indicate that the residual prosequence on sigmaE335, still impairs its activity to function as a transcription factor. The data suggest that the 11-amino-acid extension on sigmaE335 allows it to bind RNA polymerase and direct the resulting holoenzyme to sigmaE-dependent promoters but reduces the enzyme's ability to initiate transcription initiation and/or exit from the promoter.

Identifying global regulators in transcriptional regulatory networks in bacteria

The machinery for cells to take decisions, when environmental conditions change, includes protein-DNA interactions defined by transcriptional factors and their targets around promoters. Properties of global regulators are revised attempting to reach diagnostic explicit criteria for their definition and eventual future computational identification. These include among others, the number of regulated genes, the number and type of co-regulators, the different sigma-classes of promoters and the number of transcriptional factors they regulate, the size of the evolutionary family they belong to, and the variety of conditions where they exert their control. As a consequence, global versus local regulation can be identified, as shown for Escherichia coli and eventually in other genomes.

Bacillus subtilis functional genomics: global characterization of the stringent response by proteome and transcriptome analysis

The stringent response in Bacillus subtilis was characterized by using proteome and transcriptome approaches. Comparison of protein synthesis patterns of wild-type and relA mutant cells cultivated under conditions which provoke the stringent response revealed significant differences. According to their altered synthesis patterns in response to DL-norvaline, proteins were assigned to four distinct classes: (i) negative stringent control, i.e., strongly decreased protein synthesis in the wild type but not in the relA mutant (e.g., r-proteins); (ii) positive stringent control, i.e., induction of protein synthesis in the wild type only (e.g., YvyD and LeuD); (iii) proteins that were induced independently of RelA (e.g., YjcI); and (iv) proteins downregulated independently of RelA (e.g., glycolytic enzymes). Transcriptome studies based on DNA macroarray techniques were used to complement the proteome data, resulting in comparable induction and repression patterns of almost all corresponding genes. However, a comparison of both approaches revealed that only a subset of RelA-dependent genes or proteins was detectable by proteomics, demonstrating that the transcriptome approach allows a more comprehensive global gene expression profile analysis. The present study presents the first comprehensive description of the stringent response of a bacterial species and an almost complete map of protein-encoding genes affected by (p)ppGpp. The negative stringent control concerns reactions typical of growth and reproduction (ribosome synthesis, DNA synthesis, cell wall synthesis, etc.). Negatively controlled unknown y-genes may also code for proteins with a specific function during growth and reproduction (e.g., YlaG). On the other hand, many genes are induced in a RelA-dependent manner, including genes coding for already-known and as-yet-unknown proteins. A passive model is preferred to explain this positive control relying on the redistribution of the RNA polymerase under the influence of (p)ppGpp.

A three-protein inhibitor of polar septation during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis

We present evidence for a three-protein inhibitor of polar division that locks in asymmetry after the formation of a polar septum during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Asymmetric division involves the formation of cytokinetic Z-rings near both poles of the developing cell. Next, a septum is formed at one of the two polar Z-rings, thereby generating a small, forespore cell and a mother cell. Gene expression under the control of the mother-cell transcription factor sigmaE is needed to block cytokinesis at the pole distal to the newly formed septum. We report that this block in polar cytokinesis is mediated partly by sigmaE-directed transcription of spoIID, spoIIM and spoIIP, sporulation genes that were known to be involved in the subsequent process of forespore engulfment. We find that a spoIID, spoIIM and spoIIP triple mutant substantially mimicked the bipolar division phenotype of a sigmaE mutant and that cells engineered to produce SpoIID, SpoIIM and SpoIIP prematurely were inhibited in septum formation at both poles. Consistent with the hypothesis that SpoIID, SpoIIM and SpoIIP function at both poles of the sporangium, a GFP--SpoIIM fusion localized to the membrane that surrounds the engulfed forespore and to the potential division site at the distal pole.

Development of a two-part transcription probe to determine the completeness of temporal and spatial compartmentalization of gene expression during bacterial development

We have developed a two-part test, using the Bacillus subtilis sacB/SacY transcription antitermination system, to evaluate the completeness of temporal and spatial compartmentalization of gene expression during bacterial cell development. Transcription of sacY(1-55) (encoding a constitutively active form of the antiterminator, SacY) is directed by one promoter, whereas transcription of sacB'-'lacZ (the target of SacY action) is directed by the same or another promoter. To obtain beta-galactosidase activity, SacY(1-55) needs to be present when sacB'-'lacZ is being transcribed. We tested the system by analyzing the spatial compartmentalization of the activities of RNA polymerase final sigma factors, which are tightly regulated during sporulation of B. subtilis: final sigma(F) and then final sigma(G) in the prespore, final sigma(E) and then final sigma(K) in the mother cell. We have confirmed that the activities of final sigma(F) and final sigma(E) are spatially compartmentalized. We have demonstrated that there is also sharp temporal compartmentalization, with little or no overlap in the activities of final sigma(F) and final sigma(G) or of final sigma(E) and final sigma(K). In contrast, we found no compartmentalization of the activity of the main vegetative factor, final sigma(A), which continued to be active alongside all of the sporulation-specific final sigma factors. We also found no temporal compartmentalization of expression of loci that are activated during the development of competent cells of B. subtilis, a developmental program distinct from spore formation. A possible mechanism to explain the temporal compartmentalization of final sigma(F) and final sigma(G) activities is that the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB transfers from final sigma(G) to final sigma(F).

Induction of sigma(B)-dependent general stress genes by amino acid starvation in a spo0H mutant of Bacillus subtilis

Solely sigma(B)-dependent genes like gsiB and gspA are not significantly induced in amino acid-starved wild-type cells, since amino acid starvation does not trigger activation of sigma(B). The general stress gene yvyD is subject to the control of both sigma(B) and sigma(H) therefore displaying induction in response to amino acid starvation at the sigma(H)-dependent promoter. Surprisingly, the proteins YvyD, GsiB and GspA were significantly induced in amino acid-starved cells of a strain lacking sigma(H) activity. Transcriptional studies provided evidence that sigma(B)-dependent transcription is indeed induced in a spo0H mutant during amino acid starvation and depends on RsbP but not on RsbU indicating that the stress signal transduction is not required for this induction. A similar phenomenon of sigma(B) activation was observed in amino acid-starved cells of a spo0A deletion mutant. The sigma(B)-dependent transcription in a spo0H mutant further needs an active RelA protein which is responsible for strong repression of house-keeping genes after amino acid starvation (stringent response). Our data indicate that in the absence of sigma(H) and under conditions which provoke the stringent response, RsbP-dependent levels of active sigma(B) can more effectively compete for increased levels of free RNA polymerase core enzyme leading to the induction of the probably strongest sigma(B)-dependent genes.

Two ResD-controlled promoters regulate ctaA expression in Bacillus subtilis

The Bacillus subtilis ResDE two-component system plays a positive role in global regulation of genes involved in aerobic and anaerobic respiration. ctaA is one of the several genes involved in aerobic respiration that requires ResD for in vivo expression. The ctaAB-divergent promoter regulatory region has three ResD binding sites; A1, A2, and A3. The A2 site is essential for in vivo promoter activity, while binding sites A2 and A3 are required for full ctaA promoter activity. In this study, we demonstrate the role of ResD~P in the activation of the ctaA promoter using an in vitro transcription system. The results indicate that the ctaA promoter (binding sites A2 and A3) has two transcriptional start sites. Binding site A2 was sufficient for weak transcription of the upstream promoter (Pv) by Esigma(A), transcription which was enhanced approximately 1.5-fold by ResD and 5-fold by ResD~P. The downstream promoter (Ps) required both binding sites A2 and A3 and was not transcribed by Esigma(A) with or without ResD~P. RNA polymerase (RNAP) isolated from B. subtilis when cells were at the end of exponential growth (T(0)) or 3, 4, or 5 h into the stationary phase (T(3), T(4), or T( 5), respectively) was used in in vitro transcription assays. Maximal transcription from Ps required T(4) RNAP plus ResD~P. RNAP isolated from a spo0A or a sigE mutant strain was not capable of Ps transcription. Comparison of the Ps promoter sequence with the SigE binding consensus suggests that the ctaA Ps promoter may be a SigE promoter. The collective data from ResD footprinting, in vivo promoter deletion analysis, and in vitro transcription assays suggest that ctaA is transcribed during late exponential to early stationary phases of growth from the Pv promoter, which requires ResD binding site A2, Esigma(A), and ResD~P, and during later stationary phase from Ps, which requires binding sites A2 and A3, ResD~P, and Esigma(E) or a sigma factor whose transcription is dependent on SigE.

Regulation of sigma factor activity during Bacillus subtilis development

Progression of Bacillus subtilis through a series of morphological changes is driven by a cascade of sigma (sigma) factors and results in formation of a spore. Recent work has provided new insights into the location and function of proteins that control sigma factor activity, and has suggested that multiple mechanisms allow one sigma factor to replace another in the cascade.

The ClpX protein of Bacillus subtilis indirectly influences RNA polymerase holoenzyme composition and directly stimulates sigma-dependent transcription

In Bacillus subtilis, several processes associated with the onset of stationary phase, including the initiation of sporulation, require the activity of the minor sigmaH form of RNA polymerase (RNAP). The induction of sigmaH-dependent gene transcription requires the regulatory ATPase, ClpX. The ClpX-dependent post-exponential increase in sigmaH activity is not dependent on the activator of sporulation gene expression, Spo0A. By determining the level of sigmaH and sigmaA in whole-cell extracts and RNAP preparations, evidence is presented that clpX does not influence the concentration of sigma subunits, but is required for the stationary phase reduction in sigmaA-RNAP holoenzyme. This is probably an indirect consequence of ClpX activity, because the ClpX-dependent decrease in sigmaA-RNAP concentration does not occur in a spo0A abrB mutant. The addition of ClpX to in vitro transcription reactions resulted in the stimulation of RNAP holoenzyme activity, but sigmaH-RNAP was observed to be more sensitive to ClpX-dependent stimulation than sigmaA-RNAP. No difference in transcriptional activity was observed in single-cycle in vitro transcription reactions, suggesting that ClpX acted at a step in transcription initiation after closed- and open-promoter complex formation. ClpX is proposed to function indirectly in the displacement of sigmaA from core RNAP and to act directly in the stimulation of sigmaH-dependent transcription in sporulating B. subtilis cells.

Mutational analysis of beta '260-309, a sigma 70 binding site located on Escherichia coli core RNA polymerase

In eubacteria, the final sigma subunit binds to the core RNA polymerase and directs transcription initiation from any of its cognate set of promoters. Previously, our laboratory defined a region of the beta' subunit that interacts with final sigma(70) in vitro. This region of beta' contained heptad repeat motifs indicative of coiled coils. In this work, we used 10 single point mutations of the predicted coiled coils, located within residues 260-309 of beta', to look at disruption of the final sigma(70)-core interaction. Several of the mutants were defective for binding final sigma(70) in vitro. Of these mutants, three (R275Q, E295K, and A302D) caused cells to be inviable in an in vivo assay in which the mutant beta' is the sole source of beta' subunit for the cell. All of the mutants were able to assemble into the core enzyme; however, R275Q, E295K, A302D were defective for Efinal sigma(70) holoenzyme formation. Several of the mutants were also defective for holoenzyme assembly with various minor final sigma factors. In the recently published crystal structure of Thermus aquaticus core RNA polymerase (Zhang, G., Campbell, E. A., Minakhin, L., Richter, C., Severinov, K. , and Darst, S. A. (1999) Cell 98, 811-824), the region homologous to beta'(260-309) of Escherichia coli forms a coiled coil. Modeling of our mutations onto that coiled coil places the most defective mutations on one face of the coiled coil.

Environmental regulation of Bacillus subtilis sigma(D)-dependent gene expression

The sigma(D) regulon of Bacillus subtilis is composed of genes encoding proteins for flagellar synthesis, motility, and chemotaxis. Concurrent analyses of sigma(D) protein levels and flagellin mRNA demonstrate that sigD expression and sigma(D) activity are tightly coupled during growth in both complex and minimal media, although they exhibit different patterns of expression. We therefore used the sigma(D)-dependent flagellin gene (hag) as a model gene to study the effects of different nutritional environments on sigma(D)-dependent gene expression. In complex medium, the level of expression of a hag-lacZ fusion increased exponentially during the exponential growth phase and peaked early in the transition state. In contrast, the level of expression of this reporter remained constant and high throughout growth in minimal medium. These results suggest the existence of a nutritional signal(s) that affects sigD expression and/or sigma(D) activity. This signal(s) allows for nutritional repression early in growth and, based on reconstitution studies, resides in the complex components of sporulation medium, as well as in a mixture of mono-amino acids. However, the addition of Casamino Acids to minimal medium results in a dose-dependent decrease in hag-lacZ expression throughout growth and the postexponential growth phase. In work by others, CodY has been implicated in the nutritional repression of several genes. Analysis of a codY mutant bearing a hag-lacZ reporter revealed that flagellin expression is released from nutritional repression in this strain, whereas mutations in the transition state preventor genes abrB, hpr, and sinR failed to elicit a similar effect during growth in complex medium. Therefore, the CodY protein appears to be the physiologically relevant regulator of hag nutritional repression in B. subtilis.

sigmaK can negatively regulate sigE expression by two different mechanisms during sporulation of Bacillus subtilis

Temporal and spatial gene regulation during Bacillus subtilis sporulation involves the activation and inactivation of multiple sigma subunits of RNA polymerase in a cascade. In the mother cell compartment of sporulating cells, expression of the sigE gene, encoding the earlier-acting sigma factor, sigmaE, is negatively regulated by the later-acting sigma factor, sigmaK. Here, it is shown that the negative feedback loop does not require SinR, an inhibitor of sigE transcription. Production of sigmaK about 1 h earlier than normal does affect Spo0A, which when phosphorylated is an activator of sigE transcription. A mutation in the spo0A gene, which bypasses the phosphorelay leading to the phosphorylation of Spo0A, diminished the negative effect of early sigmaK production on sigE expression early in sporulation. Also, early production of sigmaK reduced expression of other Spo0A-dependent genes but not expression of the Spo0A-independent ald gene. In contrast, both sigE and ald were overexpressed late in development of cells that fail to make sigmaK. The ald promoter, like the sigE promoter, is believed to be recognized by sigmaA RNA polymerase, suggesting that sigmaK may inhibit sigmaA activity late in sporulation. To exert this negative effect, sigmaK must be transcriptionally active. A mutant form of sigmaK that associates with core RNA polymerase, but does not direct transcription of a sigmaK-dependent gene, failed to negatively regulate expression of sigE or ald late in development. On the other hand, the negative effect of early sigmaK production on sigE expression early in sporulation did not require transcriptional activity of sigmaK RNA polymerase. These results demonstrate that sigmaK can negatively regulate sigE expression by two different mechanisms, one observed when sigmaK is produced earlier than normal, which does not require sigmaK to be transcriptionally active and affects Spo0A, and the other observed when sigmaK is produced at the normal time, which requires sigmaK RNA polymerase transcriptional activity. The latter mechanism facilitates the switch from sigmaE to sigmaK in the cascade controlling mother cell gene expression.