Identification and physical characterization of the HbpR binding sites of the hbpC and hbpD promoters

Structure prediction and molecular docking studies of aromatic hydrocarbon sensing proteins TbuT, HbpR and PhnR to detect priority pollutants

On-line detection of aromatic hydrocarbon pollutants in aqueous environments can be achieved by biosensing strains having fusion of gene responsible for pollutant sensing protein with a reporter gene. Regulatory proteins TbuT, HbpR and PhnR are such proteins for recognizing one-, two-and three-ring aromatic hydrocarbon pollutants respectively, for which the structure is not known till date. Aim of the present study was to predict the structure of proteins and to determine their in-silico interaction with array of pollutants. Structure prediction of proteins was performed using I-TASSER and Phyre2 and refined with ModRefiner and 3DRefine. Total 14 models were obtained for each protein and the best model had more than 95% coverage in Ramachandran plot region. After successful structure prediction, molecular interaction of proteins with respective aromatic hydrocarbon pollutants categorized by United States Environmental Protection Agency was studied using AutoDockVina where the binding energy was found to fall in range of -4.6 to -8.4 kcal/mol. The types of protein-pollutant interaction were analyzed by LigPlus and Discovery Studio 2017 R2 Client which were found to be similar for standard and pollutant compounds. This study enables us to predict the range of pollutants possible to be detected using these regulatory protein-based biosensors.

Comparative Genomic Analysis of the Regulation of Aromatic Metabolism in Betaproteobacteria

Aromatic compounds are a common carbon and energy source for many microorganisms, some of which can even degrade toxic chloroaromatic xenobiotics. This comparative study of aromatic metabolism in 32 Betaproteobacteria species describes the links between several transcription factors (TFs) that control benzoate (BenR, BenM, BoxR, BzdR), catechol (CatR, CatM, BenM), chlorocatechol (ClcR), methylcatechol (MmlR), 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate (TfdR, TfdS), phenol (AphS, AphR, AphT), biphenyl (BphS), and toluene (TbuT) metabolism. We characterize the complexity and variability in the organization of aromatic metabolism operons and the structure of regulatory networks that may differ even between closely related species. Generally, the upper parts of pathways, rare pathway variants, and degradative pathways of exotic and complex, in particular, xenobiotic compounds are often controlled by a single TF, while the regulation of more common and/or central parts of the aromatic metabolism may vary widely and often involves several TFs with shared and/or dual, or cascade regulation. The most frequent and at the same time variable connections exist between AphS, AphR, AphT, and BenR. We have identified a novel LysR-family TF that regulates the metabolism of catechol (or some catechol derivative) and either substitutes CatR(M)/BenM, or shares functions with it. We have also predicted several new members of aromatic metabolism regulons, in particular, some COGs regulated by several different TFs.

Regulation of type VI secretion gene clusters by sigma54 and cognate enhancer binding proteins

Type VI secretion systems (T6SS) are bacteriophage-derived macromolecular machines responsible for the release of at least two proteins in the milieu, which are thought to form an extracellular appendage. Although several T6SS have been shown to be involved in the virulence of animal and plant pathogens, clusters encoding these machines are found in the genomes of most species of gram-negative bacteria, including soil, marine, and environmental isolates. T6SS have been associated with several phenotypes, ranging from virulence to biofilm formation or stress sensing. Their various environmental niches and large diversity of functions are correlated with their broad variety of regulatory mechanisms. Using a bioinformatic approach, we identified several clusters, including those of Vibrio cholerae, Aeromonas hydrophila, Pectobacterium atrosepticum, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, and a Marinomonas sp., which possess typical -24/-12 sequences, recognized by the alternate sigma factor sigma 54 (σ(54) or σ(N)). σ(54), which directs the RNA polymerase to these promoters, requires the action of a bacterial enhancer binding protein (bEBP), which binds to cis-acting upstream activating sequences. Putative bEBPs are encoded within the T6SS gene clusters possessing σ(54) boxes. Using in vitro binding experiments and in vivo reporter fusion assays, we showed that the expression of these clusters is dependent on both σ(54) and bEBPs.

Characterisation of the putative effector interaction site of the regulatory HbpR protein from Pseudomonas azelaica by site-directed mutagenesis

Bacterial transcription activators of the XylR/DmpR subfamily exert their expression control via σ(54)-dependent RNA polymerase upon stimulation by a chemical effector, typically an aromatic compound. Where the chemical effector interacts with the transcription regulator protein to achieve activation is still largely unknown. Here we focus on the HbpR protein from Pseudomonas azelaica, which is a member of the XylR/DmpR subfamily and responds to biaromatic effectors such as 2-hydroxybiphenyl. We use protein structure modeling to predict folding of the effector recognition domain of HbpR and molecular docking to identify the region where 2-hydroxybiphenyl may interact with HbpR. A large number of site-directed HbpR mutants of residues in- and outside the predicted interaction area was created and their potential to induce reporter gene expression in Escherichia coli from the cognate P(C) promoter upon activation with 2-hydroxybiphenyl was studied. Mutant proteins were purified to study their conformation. Critical residues for effector stimulation indeed grouped near the predicted area, some of which are conserved among XylR/DmpR subfamily members in spite of displaying different effector specificities. This suggests that they are important for the process of effector activation, but not necessarily for effector specificity recognition.

Transcriptional regulation of the sulfate-starvation-induced gene sfnA by a sigma54-dependent activator of Pseudomonas putida

The sigma(54)-dependent transcriptional regulator SfnR is essential for the use of dimethyl sulfone (DMSO(2)) as a sulfur source by Pseudomonas putida DS1. SfnR binds three SfnR-binding sites (sites 1, 2 and 3) within an intergenic region of the divergently transcribed sfnAB and sfnFG gene clusters. The site 1 region, proximal to the sfnF gene, is indispensable for the expression of the sfnFG operon, which encodes components of DMSO(2) monooxygenase. We investigated the transcriptional regulation of the sfnAB operon and possible functions of the sfnA gene. RT-PCR analysis revealed that the sfnAB gene cluster, which is similar to homologues of the acyl-CoA dehydrogenase family, was transcribed as an operon, and its expression was regulated by SfnR under conditions of sulfate starvation. Deletion analyses using lacZ as a reporter demonstrated that the region up to at least -138 bp from the transcription start point of sfnA (containing sites 2 and 3) was necessary for the expression of the sfnAB operon. A growth test of the sfnA-disrupted mutant revealed the possibility that sfnA may be involved in the use of methanethiol as a sulfur source.

In vitro binding of purified NahR regulatory protein with promoter Psal

The NahR regulatory protein activates the naphthalene catabolic operon through binding to the Psal promoter in the presence of salicylate. Here, we investigated in vitro binding interaction between NahR and Psal using purified functional recombinant NahR. The T7-tagged NahR was shown to exist as a monomer in solution. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) showed that purified NahR bound to Psal in 3 different forms, whereas surface plasmon resonance (SPR) showed on an SPR chip at ratios ranging from 1:1 (at 0.42 microM NahR) to 8:1 (at 6.8 microM NahR). The binding was slightly inhibited by salicylate, suggesting that salicylate may not be involved in the binding of NahR to the promoter, but rather may be important in the activation of prebound NahR. An examination of the binding kinetics by SPR for the interaction between NahR and Psal revealed that the equilibrium dissociation constant was approximately 2.44 x 10(-6) M and the association and dissociation rates were 7.82 x 10(4) M(-1) s(-1) and 0.191 s(-1), respectively. These results demonstrate for the first time that purified NahR binds as a monomer to Psal and undergoes multimerization. In addition, we present novel data on the kinetics of NahR binding.

Characterization of HbpR binding by site-directed mutagenesis of its DNA-binding site and by deletion of the effector domain

In the presence of 2-hydroxybiphenyl, the enhancer binding protein, HbpR, activates the sigma54-dependent P(hbpC) promoter and controls the initial steps of 2-hydroxybiphenyl degradation in Pseudomonas azelaica. In the activation process, an oligomeric HbpR complex of unknown subunit composition binds to an operator region containing two imperfect palindromic sequences. Here, the HbpR-DNA binding interactions were investigated by site-directed mutagenesis of the operator region and by DNA-binding assays using purified HbpR. Mutations that disrupted the twofold symmetry in the palindromes did not affect the binding affinity of HbpR, but various mutations along a 60 bp region, and also outside the direct palindromic sequences, decreased the binding affinity. Footprints of HbpR on mutant operator fragments showed that a partial loss of binding contacts occurs, suggesting that the binding of one HbpR 'protomer' in the oligomeric complex is impaired whilst leaving the other contacts intact. An HbpR variant, devoid of its N-terminal sensing A-domain, was unable to activate transcription from the hbpC promoter while maintaining protection of the operator DNA in footprints. Wild-type HbpR was unable to activate transcription from the hbpC promoter when delta A-HbpR was expressed in the same cell, suggesting the formation of (repressing) hetero-oligomers. This model implies that HbpR can self-associate on its operator DNA without effector recognition or ATP binding. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the N-terminal sensing domain of HbpR is needed to activate the central ATPase domain rather than to repress a constitutively active C domain, as is the case for the related regulatory protein XylR.

Design of new promoters and of a dual-bioreporter based on cross-activation by the two regulatory proteins XylR and HbpR

The HbpR protein is the sigma54-dependent transcription activator for 2-hydroxybiphenyl degradation in Pseudomonas azelaica. The ability of HbpR and XylR, which share 35% amino acid sequence identity, to cross-activate the PhbpC and Pu promoters was investigated by determining HbpR- or XylR-mediated luciferase expression and by DNA binding assays. XylR measurably activated the PhbpC promoter in the presence of the effector m-xylene, both in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas putida. HbpR weakly stimulated the Pu promoter in E. coli but not in P. azelaica. Poor HbpR-dependent activation from Pu was caused by a weak binding to the operator region. To create promoters efficiently activated by both regulators, the HbpR binding sites on PhbpC were gradually changed into the XylR binding sites of Pu by site-directed mutagenesis. Inducible luciferase expression from mutated promoters was tested in E. coli on a two plasmid system, and from mono copy gene fusions in P. azelaica and P. putida. Some mutants were efficiently activated by both HbpR and XylR, showing that promoters can be created which are permissive for both regulators. Others achieved a higher XylR-dependent transcription than from Pu itself. Mutants were also obtained which displayed a tenfold lower uninduced expression level by HbpR than the wild-type PhbpC, while keeping the same maximal induction level. On the basis of these results, a dual-responsive bioreporter strain of P. azelaica was created, containing both XylR and HbpR, and activating luciferase expression from the same single promoter independently with m-xylene and 2-hydroxybiphenyl.

Bacterial transcriptional regulators for degradation pathways of aromatic compounds

Human activities have resulted in the release and introduction into the environment of a plethora of aromatic chemicals. The interest in discovering how bacteria are dealing with hazardous environmental pollutants has driven a large research community and has resulted in important biochemical, genetic, and physiological knowledge about the degradation capacities of microorganisms and their application in bioremediation, green chemistry, or production of pharmacy synthons. In addition, regulation of catabolic pathway expression has attracted the interest of numerous different groups, and several catabolic pathway regulators have been exemplary for understanding transcription control mechanisms. More recently, information about regulatory systems has been used to construct whole-cell living bioreporters that are used to measure the quality of the aqueous, soil, and air environment. The topic of biodegradation is relatively coherent, and this review presents a coherent overview of the regulatory systems involved in the transcriptional control of catabolic pathways. This review summarizes the different regulatory systems involved in biodegradation pathways of aromatic compounds linking them to other known protein families. Specific attention has been paid to describing the genetic organization of the regulatory genes, promoters, and target operon(s) and to discussing present knowledge about signaling molecules, DNA binding properties, and operator characteristics, and evidence from regulatory mutants. For each regulator family, this information is combined with recently obtained protein structural information to arrive at a possible mechanism of transcription activation. This demonstrates the diversity of control mechanisms existing in catabolic pathways.

Integrated regulation in response to aromatic compounds: from signal sensing to attractive behaviour

Deciphering the complex interconnecting bacterial responses to the presence of aromatic compounds is required to gain an integrated understanding of how aromatic catabolic processes function in relation to their genome and environmental context. In addition to the properties of the catabolic enzymes themselves, regulatory responses on at least three different levels are important. At a primary level, aromatic compounds control the activity of specific members of many families of transcriptional regulators to direct the expression of the specialized enzymes for their own catabolism. At a second level, dominant global regulation in response to environmental and physiological cues is incorporated to subvert and couple transcription levels to the energy status of the bacteria. Mediators of these global regulatory responses include the alarmone (p)ppGpp, the DNA-bending protein IHF and less well-defined systems that probably sense the energy status through the activity of the electron transport chain. At a third level, aromatic compounds can also impact on catabolic performance by provoking behavioural responses that allow the bacteria to seek out aromatic growth substrates in their environment.

Transient XylR binding to the UAS of the Pseudomonas putida sigma54 promoter Pu revealed with high intensity UV footprinting in vivo

The binding of the transcriptional regulator XylR to its cognate upstream activating sequences (UAS) of the sigma54-dependent promoter Pu of Pseudomonas putida has been examined in vivo in single copy gene dose and stoichiometry. To this end, we have employed a novel in vivo genomic footprinting procedure that uses short exposures of bacterial cells to diffuse high intensity UV light that causes formation of TT or TC dimers. In contrast to simpler models for activation of sigma54-dependent promoters, our results clearly indicate that the XylR protein is not permanently bound in vivo to its target sites in Pu. On the contrary, the UAS appear to be mostly unoccupied at all growth stages. This is in contrast to the integration host factor (IHF), which binds Pu strongly in vivo at stationary phase, as also revealed by UV footprinting. Only overexpression of XylR altered the photoreactivity of the corresponding DNA region to report stable binding of the regulator to the UAS. However, the presence of aromatic XylR inducers reversed the forced occupation caused by increased levels of the activator. These results are compatible with the notion that XylR interacts very transiently with the UAS and detaches from the promoter during transcriptional activation of Pu.