Use of Ancillary Carbapenemase Tests To Improve Specificity of Phenotypic Definitions for Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Using Molecular Diagnostics to Develop Therapeutic Strategies for Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections

Infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms have become a global threat. Such infections can be very difficult to treat, especially when they are caused by carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO). Since infections caused by CPO tend to have worse outcomes than non-CPO infections, it is important to identify the type of carbapenemase present in the isolate or at least the Ambler Class (i.e., A, B, or D), to optimize therapy. Many of the newer beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations are not active against organisms carrying Class B metallo-enzymes, so differentiating organisms with Class A or D carbapenemases from those with Class B enzymes rapidly is critical. Using molecular tests to detect and differentiate carbapenem-resistance genes (CRG) in bacterial isolates provides fast and actionable results, but utilization of these tests globally appears to be low. Detecting CRG directly in positive blood culture bottles or in syndromic panels coupled with bacterial identification are helpful when results are positive, however, even negative results can provide guidance for anti-infective therapy for key organism-drug combinations when linked to local epidemiology. This perspective will focus on the reluctance of laboratories to use molecular tests as aids to developing therapeutic strategies for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms and how to overcome that reluctance.

Modified CIM test as a useful tool to detect carbapenemase activity among extensively drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter baumannii

Purpose

Timely detection of carbapenemases is essential for developing strategies to control the spread of infections by carbapenem-resistant isolates. The purpose of this study was to determine the epidemiology of carbapenemase genes among carbapenem-resistant isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli. In addition, the efficacy of the modified Hodge test (MHT), Carba NP test, and modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) were compared.

Methods

A total of 122 carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates including 77 K. pneumoniae, 39 A. baumannii, and six E. coli were collected from hospitalized patients. Three phenotypic methods, including the MHT, Carba NP test, and mCIM were used for investigation of carbapenemase production. In addition, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to detect carbapenemase-encoding genes.

Result

The sensitivity and specificity of the MHT were 75.0% and 100%, respectively. In addition, Carba NP displayed 80.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity, whereas the sensitivity and specificity were 90.4% and 100% for the mCIM test, respectively. Among carbapenem-resistant isolates, 70, 84, and 87 isolates exhibited positive results according to the MHT, Carba NP test, and mCIM, respectively. PCR indicated the presence of one or more carbapenemase genes in 119 of carbapenem-resistant isolates, with blaKPC and blaVIM being the most commonly encountered. Co-production of ‘KPC and OXA-48’, ‘KPC and VIM’, and ‘KPC and IMP’ was detected in three, nine, and seven isolates, respectively.

Conclusion

Our results confirm that the mCIM test is a useful tool for the reliable detection of carbapenemase activity in enterobacterial isolates, especially in clinical microbiological laboratories with limited resources.

Performance of a Novel Fluorogenic Assay for Detection of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae from Bacterial Colonies and Directly from Positive Blood Cultures

Rapid and accurate detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is critical for appropriate treatment and infection control. We compared a rapid fluorogenic assay using a carbapenem-based fluorogenic probe with other phenotypic assays: modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM), Carba NP test (CNP), and carbapenemase inhibition test (CIT). A total of 217 characterized isolates of Enterobacteriaceae were included as follows: 63 CPE; 48 non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (non-CP-CRE); 53 extended-spectrum β-lactamase producers; and 53 third-generation-cephalosporin-susceptible isolates. The fluorogenic assay using bacterial colonies (Fluore-C) was conducted by lysing the isolates followed by centrifugation and mixing the supernatant with fluorogenic probe. In addition, for the fluorogenic assay using spiked blood culture bottles (Fluore-Direct), pellets were obtained via the saponin preparation method, which can directly identify the pathogens using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The fluorescence signal was measured over 50 min using a fluorometer. The fluorescent signal of CPE was significantly higher than that of non-CPE in both Fluore-C (median relative fluorescence units [RFU] [range], 5,814 [240 to 32,009] versus 804 [36 to 2,480], respectively; P < 0.0001) and Fluore-Direct (median RFU [range], 10,355 [1,689 to 31,463] versus 1,068 [428 to 2,155], respectively; P < 0.0001) tests. Overall, positive and negative percent agreements of Fluore-C, mCIM, CNP, CIT, and Fluore-Direct were 100% and 98.7%, 98.3% and 97.5%, 88.1% and 100%, 96.4% and 98.7%, and 98.3% and 98.1%, respectively. The relatively lower positive percent agreement (PPA) of CNP was mainly observed in OXA-type CPE. The fluorogenic assay showed excellent performance with bacterial colonies and also directly from positive blood cultures. We included many non-CP-CRE isolates for strict evaluation. The fluorogenic assay will be a useful tool for clinical microbiology laboratories.

Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Detection Practices in California: What Are We Missing?

Background

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) revised the carbapenem breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae in 2010. The number of hospitals that adopted revised breakpoints and the clinical impact of delayed adoption has not been explored.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional, voluntary survey of microbiology laboratories from California acute care hospitals and long-term acute care hospitals (LTAC) to determine use of revised CLSI breakpoints. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) clinical isolates from a single tertiary-care hospital from 2013 to 2017 were examined. All isolates with an elevated minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC; ≥2 µg/mL) to imipenem or meropenem were tested for the presence of carbapenemase genes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Results

We received responses from 128 laboratories that serve 264/393 (67%) of hospitals and LTACs. Current CLSI carbapenem breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae were used by 92/128 (72%) laboratories. Among laboratories that used current breakpoints, time to implementation varied from 0 to 68 months (mean, 41 months; median, 55 months). Application of historical breakpoints to isolates with a carbapenemase gene detected by PCR resulted in susceptibility rates of 8.9%, 18.6%, and 18.6% to ertapenem, imipenem, and meropenem, respectively. By current breakpoints, <1% of these isolates were susceptible to ertapenem or imipenem and 2.6% to meropenem.

Conclusion

Clinicians and epidemiologists should be aware that use of outdated MIC breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae remains common and can result in reports of false susceptibility to carbapenems and missed identification of carbapenemase producers. This misclassification could have consequences for patient care and infection control efforts to address carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Diagnostic performance of the Xpert Carba-R assay for active surveillance of rectal carbapenemase-producing organisms in intensive care unit patients

Background

There are growing concerns regarding the spread of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) among patients in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) and hospitals in South Korea. We have established a screening protocol for the detection of CPOs in high-risk patients upon admission to intensive care units (ICUs). The diagnostic performance of the Xpert Carba-R assay was compared to that of rectal culture for CPO detection in high-risk patients upon ICU admission.

Methods

A total of 408 consecutive rectal swabs were obtained from December 2016 to December 2017. CPO screening was performed using the Xpert Carba-R assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). When a carbapenemase gene was detected, additional rectal swabs were incubated overnight and inoculated on chromID CARBA medium (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Bacterial carbapenemase genes, including bla_KPC, bla_NDM, bla_VIM, bla_IMP-1, and bla_OXA-48, were confirmed by conventional PCR. The diagnostic performance of the Carba-R assay was ascertained based on the culture results.

Results

The prevalence of CPO carriage was 7.4% according to the Carba-R assay and 3.7% according to rectal culture. The median Ct values of IMP-1 and KPC were significantly different (35.2 vs. 26.6, P = 0.0143). The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the Carba-R assay were 100.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.2–100.0), 96.7% (94.4–98.2), 53.6% (40.4–66.4) and 100.0% (99.0–100.0), respectively.

Conclusions

We demonstrated the prevalence of CPO carriage in high-risk patients upon ICU admission and evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Carba-R assay. The combined use of the Xpert Carba-R assay and culture produces rapid and reliable results for the active surveillance of rectal CPO in ICU patients.

Active Surveillance of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms (CPO) Colonization With Xpert Carba-R Assay Plus Positive Patient Isolation Proves to Be Effective in CPO Containment

Background: Rapid screening of patients for colonization with carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO), coupled with implementation of infection prevention strategies, has the potential to contain the spread of CPO.

Methods: We first evaluated the performance of Xpert Carba-R assay (in comparison with other phenotypic methods) for carbapenemase detection using clinical isolates, and then used it to determine the intestinal CPO colonization in hospitalized patients. We then assessed the effectiveness of patient isolation in controlling the spread of CPO in a medical intensive care unit.

Results: The Xpert Carba-R assay required the least processing time to reveal results and showed a 94.5% sensitivity and specificity in carbapenemase detection, except for IMP-8 (n = 4). During a 6-month study period, 134 patients in one ward were studied for CPO colonization and infection. Fifteen patients (11.2%) were colonized by CPO as detected by Xpert Carba-R assay, including three NDM, three IMP, and nine KPC possessing strains. The overall colonization and CPO infection rates were both 11.2% each. Isolation of patients with CPO led to a reduction in both colonization (from 28.6 to 5.6%) and infection rates (from 35.7 to 2.8%) during the study period (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Active surveillance of CPO utilizing the Xpert Carba-R assay supplemented with immediate patient isolation, proved to be an effective strategy to limit the spread of CPO in a health care setting.

Comparison of five methods for detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacterales with proposal of a new algorithm

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of five different carbapenemase tests and to develop an algorithm which will permit the detection of most common and rare carbapenemases in routine microbiology laboratories.

METHODS

The immunochromatographic tests CARBA-5 (NG), RESIST-4 O.K.N.V. (Coris), the colorimetric β-CARBA (BioRad), a newly developed carbapenem-inactivation method (CIM) supplemented with zinc (zCIM), and the Xpert Carba-R (Cepheid) were challenged with a collection of 189 molecularly characterized Enterobacterales isolates, including 146 carbapenemase producers (CPE): VIM (n = 48), OXA-48-like (n = 40), NDM (n = 29), KPC (n = 13), IMI (n = 9), IMP (n = 9), OXA-58 (n = 2), and GES (n = 2).

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity/specificity values for the five carbapenemase detection tests were 84.2% (CI 77.6-89.2%)/100% (CI 91.8-100%) for RESIST-4, 88.2% (CI 82.1-92.4%)/100% (CI 91.8-100%) for CARBA-5, 88.2% (CI 82.1-92.4%)/100% (CI 91.8-100%) for Xpert Carba-R, 73.7% (CI 66.2-80.0%)/100% (CI 93.4-99.0%) for β-CARBA, and 97.4% (CI 87.9-99.6%)/97.7% (CI 87.9-99.6%) for zCIM. The four common carbapenemases (KPC, OXA-48-like, NDM, and VIM) were detected with ≥97.6% sensitivity by all tests except for β-CARBA (76.6% (CI 68.4-83.2%)). IMI and GES were only detected by zCIM (sensitivity 90.9% (CI 62.3-98.4%)). Based on these results a new algorithm was developed, consisting of an immunochromatographic assay as the first test followed by zCIM, which allows detection of 99.3% of all carbapenemases assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

Except for β-CARBA, all methods showed excellent sensitivity/specificity for the detection of the four most frequent carbapenemases. With the new algorithm, rare variants can also be detected. It is rapid, simple, and inexpensive and can be performed in any microbiology laboratory, as no PCR equipment is required.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and other comparable agents against clinically important Gram-negative bacilli: results from the 2017 Surveillance of Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART)

Objectives

We investigated the in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinically important Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) from 16 major teaching hospitals in Taiwan in 2017.

Materials and methods

Escherichia coli (n=686) and Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream isolates (n=673), non-typhoid Salmonella (NTS; n=221) from various sources, Shigella species (n=21) from fecal samples, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (n=129) from the genitourinary tract were collected. Antibiotic minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the broth microdilution method. Alleles encoding K. pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDMs), Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase, imipenemase, _OXA-48-like, and mcr-1-5 genes were detected by molecular methods in Enterobacteriaceae isolates.

Results

Five (0.7%) E. coli isolates harbored mcr-1 alleles. Twenty-four (3.6%), seven (1.0%), four (0.6%), and one (0.15%) K. pneumoniae isolates contained bla_KPC, bla_OXA-48-like, mcr-1, and bla_NDM, respectively. Three (1.4%) NTS and no Shigella isolates harbored mcr-1 genes. Seventy-one (10.5%) K. pneumoniae isolates displayed non-susceptibility (NS) to carbapenem agent(s). Phenotypically extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing K. pneumoniae isolates showed significantly higher rates of ertapenem, tigecycline, and ceftolozane–tazobactam (CLZ– TAZ) NS (40.2%, 16.3%, and 71%–80%, respectively) than E. coli isolates exhibiting ESBL phenotypes (5.4%, 0.7%, and 18%–28%, respectively). All phenotypically ESBL-producing E. coli isolates were ceftazidime–avibactam (CAZ–AVB) susceptible. Two (8.3%) KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates showed CAZ–AVB NS. Hospital-acquired K. pneumoniae isolates were significantly less susceptible to ertapenem and CLZ–TAZ than hospital-acquired E. coli isolates.

Conclusion

Third-generation cephalosporins remain the optimal choice for treating NTS, Shigella, and gonococcal infections in Taiwan. Hospital-acquired and phenotypically ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae are a heavy resistance burden in Taiwan.

Clinical characteristics of patients with bacteraemia due to the emergence of mcr-1-harbouring Enterobacteriaceae in humans and pigs in Taiwan

This nationwide surveillance was conducted in 2017 to investigate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients with bacteraemia due to mcr-1-harbouring Enterobacteriaceae as well as the presence of mcr-1-harbouring Escherichia coli in pigs. Non-duplicate, consecutive bacterial isolates were collected from patients treated at 16 hospitals in Taiwan. All E. coli (n = 686) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 673) isolates from humans were obtained from patients with bacteraemia; for Salmonella spp. isolates (n = 221), 52.5% were obtained from blood samples and 26.2% from stool samples. The rates of mcr-1-harbouring bacteraemic isolates were 0.9% (6/686), 0.4% (3/673) and 0.9% (1/116) for E. coli, K. pneumoniae and Salmonella spp., respectively. Among the 16 E. coli isolates collected from 16 pigs, 12 (75.0%) were positive for mcr-1. Two mcr-1-positive K. pneumoniae isolates, one possessing K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) only and the other possessing both KPC and OXA-48, exhibited high-level resistance to carbapenems [minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ≥64 mg/L]. The 12 mcr-1-positive E. coli isolates from pigs were all susceptible to carbapenems. Pulsotypes of the six human mcr-1-positive E. coli isolates were different from each other and also varied from those of the porcine isolates. Among the ten patients with bacteraemia caused by mcr-1-harbouring isolates, five had community-acquired infections and five had hospital-acquired infections. Sepsis-related mortality occurred in four patients (40.0%) with bacteraemia. These findings indicate the importance of regular screening for the presence of mcr-1 in Enterobacteriaceae in humans and animals to prevent the spread of infection in hospitals and the community.

Multicenter Evaluation of the Xpert Carba-R Assay for Detection of Carbapenemase Genes in Gram-Negative Isolates

This multicenter study evaluated the performance of the Cepheid Xpert Carba-R assay, a qualitative PCR test designed for the rapid detection of bla_KPC, bla_NDM, bla_VIM, bla_IMP, and bla_OXA-48 carbapenem resistance genes from bacterial isolates grown on blood agar or MacConkey agar. The results were compared to those obtained from bidirectional DNA sequence analysis of nucleic acid extracted from pure colonies. Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii that tested as either intermediate or resistant to a carbapenem antibiotic were analyzed. A total of 467 isolates were evaluated, including prospectively collected clinical isolates, frozen isolates, and a group of contrived broth specimens sent by a central reference laboratory. The assay was run on the GeneXpert platform and took 48 min, with less than 1 min of hands-on time. Compared to the results of the reference methods, the overall sensitivity of the assay was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 99.0 to 100%) for isolates grown on both blood and MacConkey agars. Overall specificity was 98.1% (95% CI, 93.1 to 99.8%) and 97.1% (95% CI, 91.7 to 99.4%) for blood and MacConkey agars, respectively. This platform, previously demonstrated to be effective for the detection of carbapenemase genes in rectal swabs, is also adequate for the detection of these genes in bacterial colonies isolated from blood and MacConkey agars.

Molecular diagnosis of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing global public health threat. The complexities of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Molecular diagnostics are emerging in this field. Areas covered: The authors review the clinical importance of pathogenic E. coli and discuss the mechanisms of resistance to common antibiotics used to treat these infections. We review the literature on antimicrobial susceptibility testing and discuss the current state of phenotypic as well as molecular methodologies. Clinical vignettes are presented to highlight how molecular diagnostics may be used for patient care. Expert commentary: The future use of molecular diagnostics for detection of antimicrobial resistance will be tailored to the context, whether hospital epidemiology, infection control, antibiotic stewardship, or clinical care. Further clinical research is needed to understand how to best apply molecular diagnostics to these settings.