1
|
Destache CJ, Boldt D, Anthone J, Velagapudi M, Swaney R, Jerabek J, Malik N, Williams J, Jokomo-Nyakabau R, Vivekanandan R, Cavalieri SJ. Assessment of the impact of centralized bioMérieux BACT/ALERT® VIRTUO® blood culture system (VIRTUO) implementation on outcomes in patients with gram-negative bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2023; 107:116085. [PMID: 37801888 DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.116085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated pre- and postimplementation of Virtuo on outcome in patients with gram-negative bacteremia using a quasiexperimental time-in-motion design. METHODS Becton Dickinson BACTEC™ 9000 series (Bactec) (2018) and Virtuo system (2020) were utilized in a decentralized and centralized process, respectively. Data collected in August-December in 2018 and 2020 were analyzed with SPSS (ver 28). RESULTS For 185 patients in each time period, patient age, gender, length of hospitalization were not different. However, blood culture (BC) volume was significantly lower in 2020 (7.1 ± 2.6 mL) compared to 2018 (8.9 ± 1.9 mL). Time from BC draw and time from pathogen identification (ID) to treatment change were both significantly faster in 2020 (52.9 ± 38.3 hours; 15.1 ± 27.4 hours), compared to 2018 (65.0 ± 46.3 hours; 23.8 ± 33.8), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Replacement of decentralized Bactec with centralized Virtuo, resulted in significant improvement in management of patients gram-negative bacteremia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Destache
- Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA; Creighton University School of Pharmacy & Health Professions, Omaha, NE, USA.
| | - Dayla Boldt
- CHI-Creighton University Medical Center, Department of Pharmacy, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Jennifer Anthone
- CHI-Creighton University Medical Center, Department of Pharmacy, Omaha, NE, USA
| | | | | | - Julie Jerabek
- Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Nicolas Malik
- Creighton University School of Pharmacy & Health Professions, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Jassmine Williams
- Creighton University School of Pharmacy & Health Professions, Omaha, NE, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moore LSP, Villegas MV, Wenzler E, Rawson TM, Oladele RO, Doi Y, Apisarnthanarak A. Rapid Diagnostic Test Value and Implementation in Antimicrobial Stewardship Across Low-to-Middle and High-Income Countries: A Mixed-Methods Review. Infect Dis Ther 2023:10.1007/s40121-023-00815-z. [PMID: 37261612 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-023-00815-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite technological advancements in infectious disease rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and use to direct therapy at the per-patient level, RDT utilisation in antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) is variable across low-to-middle income and high-income countries. Key insights from a panel of seven infectious disease experts from Colombia, Japan, Nigeria, Thailand, the UK, and the USA, combined with evidence from a literature review, were used to assess the value of RDTs in ASPs. From this, a value framework is proposed which aims to define the benefits of RDT use in ASPs, separate from per-patient benefits. Expert insights highlight that, to realise the value of RDTs within ASPs, effective implementation is key; actionable advice for choosing an RDT is proposed. Experts advocate the inclusion of RDTs in the World Health Organization Model List of essential in vitro diagnostics and in iterative development of national action plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke S P Moore
- Clinical Infection Department, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, North West London Pathology, London, UK.
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections & Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Maria Virginia Villegas
- Grupo de Resistencia Antimicrobiana y Epidemiología Hospitalaria, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia
- Molecular Genetics and Antimicrobial Resistance Unit, International Center for Microbial Genomics, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Eric Wenzler
- College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Timothy M Rawson
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections & Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Centre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rita O Oladele
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Yohei Doi
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
- Department of Microbiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Anucha Apisarnthanarak
- Research Group in Infectious Diseases Epidemiology and Prevention, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Potvin M, Larranaga Lapique E, Hites M, Martiny D. Implementing Alfred60 AST in a clinical lab: Clinical impact on the management of septic patients and financial analysis. ANNALES PHARMACEUTIQUES FRANÇAISES 2023; 81:466-474. [PMID: 36402206 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharma.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sepsis is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. An accelerated microbiology diagnosis is crucial in order to reduce the time to initiate targeted antibiotic therapy. The Alfred60AST system is able to provide phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) results within hours. This study has two objectives: assess the clinical impact of this technology and determine its cost-effectiveness. METHODS During a ten-week period, all new enterobacterial or enterococcal bloodstream infection was analyzed with the Alfred60AST system, in parallel with routine methods. Its impact on the clinician's therapeutic strategy was studied. In order to assess the financial and practical aspects of the method, an analysis of the extracosts and a survey of the technical staff were conducted. RESULTS Fifty-three cases of bacteriemia were included. For the Enterobacteriaceae bacteriemias, a clinical impact was shown in 18.9% of the cases (e.g, treatment modification). The financial analysis highlighted an increase in costs (+38% for Enterobacteriaceae, +50% for Enterococci), compared to the theoretical costs reported by the firm, due to the workflow and the volumes of samples used. Finally, results of the technical staff survey were favorable in terms of ease of use of the system. CONCLUSION In addition to its ease of use, the Alfred60AST system is able to provide an AST in a record time. This study shows a real interest of the technique in the therapeutic management of patients with enterobacterial sepsis. However, its routine implementation requires an increase of the analyzed volumes as well as a 24/7 organization of the laboratory in order to be profitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Potvin
- Microbiology Department, LHUB-ULB, rue haute, 322, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
| | - E Larranaga Lapique
- Department of Infectious Disease, Erasme Hospital, route de Lennik, 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Hites
- Department of Infectious Disease, Erasme Hospital, route de Lennik, 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - D Martiny
- Microbiology Department, LHUB-ULB, rue haute, 322, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rawson TM, Antcliffe DB, Wilson RC, Abdolrasouli A, Moore LSP. Management of Bacterial and Fungal Infections in the ICU: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention Recommendations. Infect Drug Resist 2023; 16:2709-2726. [PMID: 37168515 PMCID: PMC10166098 DOI: 10.2147/idr.s390946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Bacterial and fungal infections are common issues for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Large, multinational point prevalence surveys have identified that up to 50% of ICU patients have a diagnosis of bacterial or fungal infection at any one time. Infection in the ICU is associated with its own challenges. Causative organisms often harbour intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of drug-resistance, making empiric and targeted antimicrobial selection challenging. Infection in the ICU is associated with worse clinical outcomes for patients. We review the epidemiology of bacterial and fungal infection in the ICU. We discuss risk factors for acquisition, approaches to diagnosis and management, and common strategies for the prevention of infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy M Rawson
- Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
- Centre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, Imperial College London, London, UK
- David Price Evan’s Group in Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Correspondence: Timothy M Rawson, Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections & Antimicrobial Resistance, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom, Email
| | - David B Antcliffe
- Centre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Division Anaesthesia, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Richard C Wilson
- Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
- Centre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, Imperial College London, London, UK
- David Price Evan’s Group in Infectious Diseases and Global Health, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Luke S P Moore
- Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
- Chelsea & Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- North West London Pathology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Days of Antibiotic Spectrum Coverage Trends and Assessment in Patients with Bloodstream Infections: A Japanese University Hospital Pilot Study. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11121745. [PMID: 36551402 PMCID: PMC9774691 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11121745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The antibiotic spectrum is not reflected in conventional antimicrobial metrics. Days of antibiotic spectrum coverage (DASC) is a novel quantitative metric for antimicrobial consumption developed with consideration of the antibiotic spectrum. However, there were no data regarding disease and pathogen-specific DASC. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the DASC trend in patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs). DASC and days of therapy (DOT) of in-patients with positive blood culture results during a 2-year interval were evaluated. Data were aggregated to calculate the DASC, DOT, and DASC/DOT per patient stratified by pathogens. During the 2-year study period, 1443 positive blood culture cases were identified, including 265 suspected cases of contamination. The overall DASC, DASC/patient, DOT, DOT/patient, and DASC/DOT metrics were 226,626; 157.1; 28,778; 19.9; and 7.9, respectively. A strong correlation was observed between DASC and DOT, as well as DASC/patient and DOT/patient. Conversely, DASC/DOT had no correlation with other metrics. The combination of DASC and DOT would be a useful benchmark for the overuse and misuse evaluation of antimicrobial therapy in BSIs. Notably, DASC/DOT would be a robust metric to evaluate the antibiotic spectrum that was selected for patients with BSIs.
Collapse
|
6
|
Empirical antibiotic therapy for difficult-to-treat Gram-negative infections: when, how, and how long? Curr Opin Infect Dis 2022; 35:568-574. [PMID: 36206149 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To discuss empirical therapy for severe infections due to Gram-negative bacteria with difficult-to-treat resistance (GNB-DTR) in current clinical practice, focusing in particular on the positioning of novel therapeutic agents and rapid diagnostic tests. RECENT FINDINGS The current era of novel agents active against GNB-DTR and showing differential activity against specific determinants of resistance is an unprecedented scenario, in which the clinical reasoning leading to the choice of the empirical therapy for treating severe GNB-DTR infections is becoming more complex, but it also allows for enhanced treatment precision. SUMMARY Novel agents should be used in line with antimicrobial stewardship principles, aimed at reducing selective pressure for antimicrobial resistance. However, this does not mean that they should not be used. Indeed, excesses in restrictive uses may be unethical by precluding access to the most effective and less toxic treatments for patients with severe GNB-DTR infections. Given these premises (the 'how'), empirical treatment with novel agents should be considered in all patients with risk factors for GNB-DTR and severe clinical presentation of acute infection (the 'when'). Furthermore, empirical novel agents should preferably be continued only for a few hours, until de-escalation, modification, or confirmation (as targeted therapy) is made possible by the results of rapid diagnostic tests (the 'how long').
Collapse
|
7
|
Tiseo G, Brigante G, Giacobbe DR, Maraolo AE, Gona F, Falcone M, Giannella M, Grossi P, Pea F, Rossolini GM, Sanguinetti M, Sarti M, Scarparo C, Tumbarello M, Venditti M, Viale P, Bassetti M, Luzzaro F, Menichetti F, Stefani S, Tinelli M. Diagnosis and management of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria: guideline endorsed by the Italian Society of Infection and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT), the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA), the Italian Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship (GISA), the Italian Association of Clinical Microbiologists (AMCLI) and the Italian Society of Microbiology (SIM). Int J Antimicrob Agents 2022; 60:106611. [PMID: 35697179 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2022.106611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Management of patients with infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach to achieve successful clinical outcomes. The aim of this paper is to provide recommendations for the diagnosis and optimal management of these infections, with a focus on targeted antibiotic therapy. The document was produced by a panel of experts nominated by the five endorsing Italian societies, namely the Italian Association of Clinical Microbiologists (AMCLI), the Italian Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship (GISA), the Italian Society of Microbiology (SIM), the Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT) and the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA). Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) questions about microbiological diagnosis, pharmacological strategies and targeted antibiotic therapy were addressed for the following pathogens: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. A systematic review of the literature published from January 2011 to November 2020 was guided by the PICO strategy. As data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were expected to be limited, observational studies were also reviewed. The certainty of evidence was classified using the GRADE approach. Recommendations were classified as strong or conditional. Detailed recommendations were formulated for each pathogen. The majority of available RCTs have serious risk of bias, and many observational studies have several limitations, including small sample size, retrospective design and presence of confounders. Thus, some recommendations are based on low or very-low certainty of evidence. Importantly, these recommendations should be continually updated to reflect emerging evidence from clinical studies and real-world experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giusy Tiseo
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Gioconda Brigante
- Clinical Pathology Laboratory, ASST Valle Olona, Busto Arsizio, Italy
| | - Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Clinica Malattie Infettive, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Floriana Gona
- Emerging Bacterial Pathogens Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Falcone
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Maddalena Giannella
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Grossi
- Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria-ASST-Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy
| | - Federico Pea
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; SSD Clinical Pharmacology, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Rossolini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy, and Microbiology and Virology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Maurizio Sanguinetti
- Microbiology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo 'A. Gemelli', Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Sarti
- Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Claudio Scarparo
- Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Angel's Hospital, AULSS3 Serenissima, Mestre, Venice, Italy
| | - Mario Tumbarello
- Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Mario Venditti
- Policlinico 'Umberto I', Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, 'Sapienza' University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Viale
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Bassetti
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Clinica Malattie Infettive, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Luzzaro
- Clinical Microbiology and Virology Unit, A. Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy
| | - Francesco Menichetti
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
| | - Stefania Stefani
- Medical Molecular Microbiology and Antibiotic Resistance Laboratory (MMARLab), Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Marco Tinelli
- Infectious Diseases Consultation Service, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Performance of the Reveal Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing System on Gram-Negative Blood Cultures at a Large Urban Hospital. J Clin Microbiol 2022; 60:e0009822. [PMID: 35607972 PMCID: PMC9199398 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00098-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Timely and effective antibiotic treatment is vital for sepsis, with increasing incidence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteremia driving interest in rapid phenotypic susceptibility testing. To enable the widespread adoption needed to make an impact, antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) systems need to be accurate, enable rapid intervention, have a broad antimicrobial menu and be easy to use and affordable. We evaluated the Specific Reveal (Specific Diagnostics, San Jose, CA) rapid AST system on positive blood cultures with Gram-negative organisms in a relatively resistant population in a large urban hospital to assess its potential for routine clinical use. One hundred four randomly selected positive blood cultures (Virtuo; bioMérieux) were Gram stained, diluted 1:1,000 in Pluronic water, inoculated into 96-well antibiotic plates, sealed with the Reveal sensor panel, and placed in the Reveal instrument for incubation and reading. The MIC and susceptible/intermediate/resistant category was determined and compared to results from Vitek 2 (bioMérieux) for the 17 antimicrobials available and to Sensititre (Thermo Fisher) for 24 antimicrobials. Performance was also assessed with contrived blood cultures with 33 highly resistant strains. Reveal was in 98.0% essential agreement (EA) and 96.3% categorical agreement (CA) with Sensititre, with just 1.3% very major error (VME) and 97.0%/96.2%/1.3% EA/CA/VME versus Vitek 2. Reveal results for contrived highly resistant strains were equivalent, with EA/CA/VME of 97.7%/95.2%/1.0% with CDC/FDA Antibiotic Resistance Isolate Bank references. Average time to result (TTR) for Reveal was 4.6 h. Sample preparation was relatively low skill and averaged 3 min. We conclude that the Reveal system enables accurate and rapid susceptibility testing of Gram-negative blood cultures.
Collapse
|
9
|
Watkins RR, Bonomo RA, Rello J. Managing sepsis in the era of precision medicine: challenges and opportunities. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2022; 20:871-880. [PMID: 35133228 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2022.2040359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Precision medicine is a medical model in which decisions, practices, interventions and therapies are tailored to the individual patient based on their predicted response or risk of disease. Sepsis is a life-threatening condition characterized by immune system dysregulation whose pathophysiology remains incompletely understood. There is much hope that precision medicine can lead to better outcomes in patients with sepsis. AREAS COVERED In this review from a comprehensive literature search in PubMed for English-language studies conducted in adults, we highlight recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of sepsis of bacterial origin in adults using precision medicine approaches including rapid diagnostic tests, predictive biomarkers, genomic methods, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and monitoring cell mediated immunity. Challenges and directions for future research are also discussed. EXPERT OPINION Current diagnostic testing in sepsis relies primarily on conventional cultures (e.g. blood cultures), which are time-consuming and may delay critical therapeutic decisions. Nonculture-based techniques including nucleic acid amplification technologies (NAAT), other molecular methods (biomarkers), and genomic sequencing offer promise to overcome some of the inherent limitations seen with culture-based techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard R Watkins
- Department of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, USA
| | - Robert A Bonomo
- Medicine Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Research Service, Veterans Affairs Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland, OH, USA.,CWRU-Cleveland VAMC Center for Antimicrobial Resistance and Epidemiology, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jordi Rello
- Clinical Research in Pneumonia and Sepsis, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Barcelona, Spain.,Clinical Research, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Maribeau, Nimes, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
OUP accepted manuscript. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77:1020-1026. [DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
11
|
Sze DTT, Lau CCY, Chan TM, Ma ESK, Tang BSF. Comparison of novel rapid diagnostic of blood culture identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing by Accelerate Pheno system and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification and BioFire FilmArray Blood Culture Identification 2 panels. BMC Microbiol 2021; 21:350. [PMID: 34922463 PMCID: PMC8684256 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02403-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Conventional turnaround time (TAT) for positive blood culture (PBC) identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is 2–3 days. We evaluated the TAT and ID/AST performance using clinical and seeded samples directly from PBC bottles with different commercial approaches: (1) Accelerate Pheno® system (Pheno) for ID/AST; (2) BioFire® FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel and/ or BCID2 for ID; (3) direct AST by VITEK® 2 (direct AST); and (4) overnight culture using VITEK® 2 colony AST. Results
A total of 141 PBC samples were included in this evaluation. Using MALDI-TOF (Bruker MALDI Biotyper) as the reference method for ID, the overall monomicrobial ID sensitivity/specificity are as follows: Pheno 97.9/99.9%; BCID 100/100%; and BCID2 100/100%, respectively. For AST performance, broth microdilution (BMD) was used as the reference method. For gram-negatives, overall categorical and essential agreements (CA/EA) for each method were: Pheno 90.3/93.2%; direct AST 92.6/88.5%; colony AST 94.4/89.5%, respectively. For gram-positives, the overall CA/EAs were as follows: Pheno 97.2/98.89%; direct AST 97.2/100%; colony AST 97.2/100%, respectively. The BCID/BCID2 and direct AST TATs were around 9–20 h (1/9-19 h for ID with resistance markers/AST), with 15 min/sample hands-on time. In comparison, Pheno TATs were around 8–10 h (1.5/7 h for ID/AST) with 2 min/sample hands-on time, maintains a clinically relevant fast report of antibiotic minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and allows for less TAT and hands-on time. Conclusion In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study conducted as such in Asia; all studied approaches achieved satisfactory performance, factors such as TAT, panel of antibiotics choices and hands-on time should be considered for the selection of appropriate rapid ID and AST of PBC methods in different laboratory settings. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-021-02403-y.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GNBSI) are common and carry considerable mortality. Treatment is complicated by increasing antimicrobial resistance, posing a challenge for timely appropriate antibiotics and limiting the choices of effective definitive therapy. The present review aims to summarize recent studies addressing the management of GNBSI. RECENT FINDINGS New rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) for pathogen identification and antibiotic susceptibility are associated with improved antimicrobial stewardship and reduced length of stay. No mortality benefit or patient-related outcomes are reported. Data regarding the use of new beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) for treating multidrug resistance Gram-negative bacteria is supportive, though questions regarding combinations, optimal dosing, mode of administration, and resistance emergence remain to be clarified. Current data regarding cefiderocol necessitates further studies in order to support its use in GNBSI. Shortened (≤7 days) duration of therapy and early oral step down for GNBSI are supported by the literature. The role of repeated blood cultures should be further defined. SUMMARY RDTs should be implemented to improve antibiotic stewardship. Clinical implications on patient-related outcomes should be evaluated. New BLBLIs show promise in the treatment of GNBSI. Additional data are needed regarding the use of cefiderocol. Antibiotic therapy should be shortened and early oral step down should be considered.
Collapse
|
13
|
New Microbiological Techniques for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections and Sepsis in ICU Including Point of Care. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2021; 23:12. [PMID: 34149321 PMCID: PMC8207499 DOI: 10.1007/s11908-021-00755-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review The aim of this article is to review current and emerging microbiological techniques that support the rapid diagnosis of bacterial infections in critically ill patients, including their performance, strengths and pitfalls, as well as available data evaluating their clinical impact. Recent Findings Bacterial infections and sepsis are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in patients admitted to the intensive care unit and their management is further complicated by the increase in the global burden of antimicrobial resistance. In this setting, new diagnostic methods able to overcome the limits of traditional microbiology in terms of turn-around time and accuracy are highly warranted. We discuss the following broad themes: optimisation of existing culture-based methodologies, rapid antigen detection, nucleic acid detection (including multiplex PCR assays and microarrays), sepsis biomarkers, novel methods of pathogen detection (e.g. T2 magnetic resonance) and susceptibility testing (e.g. morphokinetic cellular analysis) and the application of direct metagenomics on clinical samples. The assessment of the host response through new “omics” technologies might also aid in early diagnosis of infections, as well as define non-infectious inflammatory states. Summary Despite being a promising field, there is still scarce evidence about the real-life impact of these assays on patient management. A common finding of available studies is that the performance of rapid diagnostic strategies highly depends on whether they are integrated within active antimicrobial stewardship programs. Assessing the impact of these emerging diagnostic methods through patient-centred clinical outcomes is a complex challenge for which large and well-designed studies are awaited.
Collapse
|
14
|
MacVane SH, Bhalodi AA, Dare RK, Rosenbaum ER, Wolfe K, Ford B, Ince D, Kinn P, Percival KM, Humphries RM. Improving outcomes and antibiotic stewardship (IOAS) for patients with Gram-positive bloodstream infections through use of rapid testing: a quasi-experimental multicentre study of the Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC Kit. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 76:2453-2463. [PMID: 34021752 PMCID: PMC8361360 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data from the Improving Outcomes and Antibiotic Stewardship for Patients with Bloodstream Infections: Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC Kit (AXDX) Registry Study were analysed to determine the impact of rapid organism identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for Gram-positive bacteraemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicentre, quasi-experimental study evaluated clinical and antimicrobial stewardship metrics following the implementation of AXDX. Data from hospitalized patients with bacteraemia were compared between groups, one that underwent testing on AXDX (post-AXDX) and one that underwent traditional identification and AST (pre-AXDX). An analysis of patients with Gram-positive bacteraemia was performed. The primary outcome was time to optimal therapy (TTOT). Secondary outcomes included time to first antibiotic modification (overall and Gram-positive), duration of unnecessary MRSA coverage, incidence of adverse events, length of stay and mortality. RESULTS A total of 219 (109 pre-AXDX, 110 post-AXDX) patients with Gram-positive bacteraemia were included. Median TTOT was 36.3 h (IQR, 16.9-56.7) in the pre-AXDX group and 20.4 h (IQR, 7.5-36.7) in the post-AXDX group (P = 0.01). Compared with pre-AXDX, median time to first antibiotic modification (29.1 versus 15.9 h; P = 0.002), time to first Gram-positive antibiotic modification (33.2 versus 17.2 h; P = 0.003) and median duration of unnecessary MRSA coverage (58.4 versus 29.7 h; P = 0.04) were reduced post-AXDX. A trend towards decreased acute kidney injury (24% versus 13%; P = 0.06) was observed in the post-AXDX group. Groups did not differ in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of AXDX testing for patients with Gram-positive bacteraemia shortened the TTOT and reduced unnecessary antibiotic exposure due to faster antibiotic modifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ryan K Dare
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Eric R Rosenbaum
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Services, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Kaleb Wolfe
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Bradley Ford
- Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Dilek Ince
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Patrick Kinn
- Department of Pharmaceutical Care, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Kelly M Percival
- Department of Pharmaceutical Care, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Romney M Humphries
- Accelerate Diagnostics, Inc, Tucson, AZ, USA.,Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Savage TJ, Rao S, Joerger J, Ozonoff A, McAdam AJ, Sandora TJ. Predictive Value of Direct Disk Diffusion Testing from Positive Blood Cultures in a Children's Hospital and Its Utility in Antimicrobial Stewardship. J Clin Microbiol 2021; 59:e02445-20. [PMID: 33692138 PMCID: PMC8316030 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02445-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Accurate and early susceptibility results could reduce overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics for empirical treatment of bacteremia. Direct disk diffusion testing (dDD) using nonstandardized inocula directly from blood cultures could facilitate earlier narrowing of antibiotics. To determine the predictive value of dDD compared with standardized antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), we performed a retrospective cohort study of 582 blood cultures from 495 pediatric patients with bacteremia. Positive and negative predictive value (PPV: number of isolates susceptible by both dDD and AST divided by the total number of isolates susceptible by dDD; NPV: number of isolates not susceptible [either intermediate or resistant] by both dDD and AST divided by the total number of isolates not susceptible by dDD), sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence interval were calculated for each bacterium-antibiotic combination. We evaluated the Antibiotic Spectrum Index of prescribed antibiotics to assess change in antibiotic prescribing after availability of Gram stain, dDD, and AST results. dDD results were available a median of 21 h before AST results. dDD had PPVs of ≥96% for most organism-antibiotic pairs, including 100% (CI 96 to 100%) for Staphylococcus aureus with oxacillin and 99% (CI 93 to 100%) for Enterobacterales with ceftriaxone. NPVs of dDD were variable and frequently lower than the PPV. Very major errors and major errors occurred in 31/5,454 (0.6%) and 231/5,454 (4.2%) organism-antibiotic combinations, respectively. Antibiotics were narrowed in 30% of cases after a dDD result and a further 25% of cases after AST result. dDD is highly predictive of susceptibility for many common organism-antibiotic combinations and provides actionable information one day earlier than standard susceptibility approaches. dDD has the potential to facilitate earlier deescalation to narrow-spectrum antibiotic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Savage
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shun Rao
- Precision Vaccines Program, Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jill Joerger
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Al Ozonoff
- Precision Vaccines Program, Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexander J McAdam
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas J Sandora
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Banerjee R, Humphries R. Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods for Blood Cultures and Their Clinical Impact. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:635831. [PMID: 33777978 PMCID: PMC7987685 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.635831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria isolated in blood cultures is critical for optimal management of patients with sepsis. This review describes new and emerging phenotypic and genotypic AST methods and summarizes the evidence that implementation of these methods can impact clinical outcomes of patients with bloodstream infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritu Banerjee
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Romney Humphries
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|