Is This the Carbapenemase Test We've Been Waiting for? A Multicenter Evaluation of the Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method

Diagnostic Test Precision of Modified Carbapenem Inactivation Method and Carbapenemase Nordmann-Poirel Test for Phenotypic Detection of Carbapenemase Production in Enterobacterales: A Systematic Review

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, particularly those that produce carbapenemases, pose a significant public health concern due to very limited treatment options. The timely identification of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) is essential for putting in place efficient infection control measures and selecting appropriate antimicrobial therapies, thereby improving the clinical outcome of the patient. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the diagnostic accuracy and practicality between two phenotypic tests, namely the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) and carbapenemase Nordmann-Poirel (Carba NP) test, in detecting carbapenemase production by Enterobacterales and thereby aiding the clinician in making a decision to choose an appropriate test for their phenotypic detection. This systematic review involved combining sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, diagnostic odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CIs), Forest plot for sensitivity and specificity, and plotting suitable summary receiver operating characteristic curve with the area under the curve. Of the 20 studies included in this review, the overall effect sizes of Carba NP and mCIM with 95% CIs were as follows: sensitivity, 91% (86-96%) and 97% (95-99%); specificity, 93% (88-97%) and 97% (93-100%); PPV, 97% and 98%; NPV, 79% and 90%; accuracy, 93% and 97%; diagnostic odds ratio, 1487.8879 and 8527.5541; and AUC, 0.85 and 1, respectively. In conclusion, the mCIM method showed superior sensitivity (97%), specificity (97%), and accuracy compared to the Carba NP test in detecting carbapenemase production, even though both these methods had a few technical limitations. The Carba NP test is rapid, affordable, and dependable, whereas mCIM is more accurate and cost-effective but time-consuming. We propose that both tests can be reliably used for screening of carbapenemase production in Enterobacterales, as endorsed by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute even in resource-limited clinical laboratories, in the order of prioritizing the mCIM method first and then followed by the Carba NP test when situation demands expedited results.

A Pooling Strategy for Detecting Carbapenem Resistance Genes by the Xpert Carba-R Test in Rectal Swab Specimens

Rapid and accurate detection of carriers of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO) in hospitalized patients is critical for infection control and prevention. This study aimed to evaluate a pooling strategy for the detection of carbapenem resistance genes (CRG) in multiple specimens using the Xpert Carba-R test. Two rectal swabs each were collected from 415 unique patients. One swab was tested by Carba-R on the five specimen-pooled strategy. The other swab was tested individually by culture followed by DNA sequence analysis for CRG as the reference. At the first 5:1 pooling testing, 22 of 83 pools were positive, which yielded 34 positives from individual specimens when positive pools were subsequently retested. All individual specimens in the 61 negative pools were retested as negative by Carba-R. Among the 34 Carba-R-positive samples, 30 and four were positive and negative, respectively, by culture and sequencing. The remaining 381 Carba-R-negative specimens were also negative by culture and sequencing. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the 5:1 pooled screening were 100.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 85.9% to 100%), 99.0% (95% CI = 97.2% to 99.7%), 88.2% (95% CI = 71.6% to 96.2%), and 100.0% (95% CI = 98.8% to 100%), respectively. Using the 5:1 pooling strategy, our study completed CRG screening in 414 patients with 193 reagents with significant cost savings. The 5:1 pooling strategy using the Carba-R test showed a potential method for screening CRG from rectal swabs with good sensitivity and decreased cost.

Diagnostic Accuracy and Agreement between Four Phenotypic Carbapenemase Detection Tests among Enterobacterales

Introduction:

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CREs) are becoming increasingly popular as a cause of hospital-acquired infections that are difficult to treat and are frequently reported as causes of outbreaks in various hospitals. Conventional culturing techniques take at least 2 days to report a case as carbapenem resistant, and it is therefore important to detect such resistance mechanisms as early as possible.

Methods:

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of Carba NP, modified Hodge test (MHT), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) disk synergy test (DST), and the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM). This study was done at Microbiology Laboratory, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi. It was an observational study. Carba NP, MHT, EDTA DST, and the mCIM were performed on consecutive isolates of Enterobacterales. Sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between the four tests were calculated.

Results:

Of 207 Enterobacterales isolated, 127 were resistant to carbapenems. One hundred and fourteen of these were tested by a polymerase chain reaction, and the sensitivities of the Carba NP, MHT, EDTA DST, and the mCIM were found to be 94.34%, 75.47%, 79.25%, and 98.11%, respectively.

Conclusions:

Due to increased rates of carbapenem resistance, there is a need to employ mechanisms in hospitals that can identify such organisms as early as possible, both from clinical and epidemiological standpoints. The Carba NP test is a rapid, cost–effective, and reliable method and mCIM is more accurate but time consuming and both can be safely used for the screening of CREs.

mCIM test as a reliable assay for the detection of CRE in the Gulf region

Introduction. Carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are one of the leading causes of systemic and nosocomial infections and are multidrug-resistant organisms producing different carbapenemases. There are many genotypic and phenotypic methods for detecting the carbapenemases; however, there is a limitation for each. Modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) assay is a recent phenotypic method which has been published by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.Hypothesis / Gap Statement. mCIM assay could provide a reliable method for the detection of carbapenemases in CRE.Aim. Evaluation of the mCIM assay performance for the detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacterales and the identification of the common carbapenemase genes at Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia and Kingdom of Bahrain.Methodology. A collection of 197 non-duplicate carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates, were evaluated with the mCIM test comparing its performance to multiplex PCR. The minimum inhibitory concentration susceptibility testing was done by the Etest method for imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem.Results. The sensitivity of the mCIM assay was 94 % (95 % CI, (89.3-97.1)). In Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, OXA-48 was the most prevalent carbapenemase gene followed by NDM. Coexistence of multiple carbapenemase genes is reported in eleven cases.Conclusion. These findings indicate that the mCIM test is a reliable and simple assay for detecting the activity of carbapenemase in Enterobacterales, especially in resource-limited laboratories.

Risk Factors Associated with Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales (CPE) Positivity in the Hospital Wastewater Environment

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing organisms (KPCOs) are bacteria that are resistant to most antibiotics and thus are challenging to treat when they cause infections in patients. These organisms can be acquired by patients who are hospitalized for other reasons, complicating their hospital stay and even leading to death. Hospital wastewater sites, such as sink drains and toilets, have played a role in many reported outbreaks over the past decade. The significance of our research is in identifying risk factors for environmental positivity for KPCOs, which will facilitate further work to prevent transmission of these organisms to patients from the hospital environment.

Hospital wastewater is an increasingly recognized reservoir for resistant Gram-negative organisms. Factors involved in establishment and persistence of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing organisms (KPCOs) in hospital wastewater plumbing are unclear. This study was conducted at a hospital with endemic KPCOs linked to wastewater reservoirs and robust patient perirectal screening for silent KPCO carriage. Over 5 months, both rooms occupied and rooms not occupied by KPCO-positive patients were sampled at three wastewater sites within each room (sink drain, sink P-trap, and toilet or hopper). Risk factors for KPCO positivity were assessed using logistic regression. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) identified environmental seeding by KPCO-positive patients. A total of 219/475 (46%) room sampling events were KPCO positive in at least one wastewater site. KPCO-positive patient exposure was associated with increased risk of environmental positivity for the room and toilet/hopper. Previous positivity and intensive care unit room type were consistently associated with increased risk. Tube feeds were associated with increased risk for the drain, while exposure to patients with Clostridioides difficile was associated with decreased risk. Urinary catheter exposure was associated with increased risk of P-trap positivity. P-trap heaters reduced risk of P-trap and sink drain positivity. WGS identified genomically linked environmental seeding in 6 of 99 room occupations by 40 KPCO-positive patients. In conclusion, KPCO-positive patients seed the environment in at least 6% of opportunities; once positive for KPCOs, wastewater sites are at greater risk of being positive subsequently. Increased nutrient exposure, e.g., due to tube food disposal down sinks, may increase risk; frequent flushing may be protective.

IMPORTANCEKlebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing organisms (KPCOs) are bacteria that are resistant to most antibiotics and thus are challenging to treat when they cause infections in patients. These organisms can be acquired by patients who are hospitalized for other reasons, complicating their hospital stay and even leading to death. Hospital wastewater sites, such as sink drains and toilets, have played a role in many reported outbreaks over the past decade. The significance of our research is in identifying risk factors for environmental positivity for KPCOs, which will facilitate further work to prevent transmission of these organisms to patients from the hospital environment.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: An emerging bacterial threat

The first reports of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae isolates occurred in the early 1990s. Researchers published the first report of an isolate that produced Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase in 2001. Since that time, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates have disseminated globally. Microbiology laboratories are integral to the control of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Laboratories need to be able to identify CRE, identify possible therapeutic alternatives, and sometimes identify the type of mechanism responsible for the carbapenem-resistant phenotype. Knowledge of these tasks is essential for all clinical microbiology laboratorians.

Phenotypic and molecular identification of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae - challenges in diagnosis and treatment

Introduction: Infections due to carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CPCRE) are an emerging global public health threat. The purpose of this study was to investigate phenotypic and genotypic features of CP-CRE strains isolated from hospitalized patients. Material and methods: Between 1st of January - 1st of July 2017, in the Department of Microbiology, “Dr. Constantin Opriş” County Emergency Hospital Baia Mare, Romania, 1110 strains of Enterobacteriaceae were isolated from bronchial secretions, urine, wounds and blood cultures. Bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed by conventional methods, Vitek 2 Compact and M.I.C.E. strips. We analysed all Enterobacteriaceae strains non-susceptible to carbapenems according to CLSI 2017 criteria. The modified Hodge test (MHT), the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) and the combination disks test (KPC, MBL, OXA-48 Confirm kit, Rosco Diagnostica) were used for phenotypic confirmation, whereas a multiplex PCR assay for genes blaKPC, blaNDM and blaOXA-48 was used for genetic confirmation. Results: 19 non-duplicate strains isolated from 16 patients were phenotypically identified as CP-CRE: Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=14), Escherichia coli (n=2), Providencia stuartii (n=2) and Serratia marcescens (n=1). Most strains were isolated from bronchial secretions (n=9). The carbapenem-hydrolizing enzymes were identified by the combination disks test as: KPC (n=9), OXA-48-like (n=5) and MBL (n=5). Molecular confirmation was performed in 18 phenotypically positive isolates with 100% concordant results with mCIM and combination disks test. Discrepant results were noticed with the MHT in case of 4 NDM-producers confirmed by PCR. All CP-CRE strains were resistant to all tested cephems. Three out of 9 K. pneumoniae strains tested against colistin were found resistant. Conclusions: The most common carbapenemase detected was KPC. Therapeutic options were limited in all positive cases. Rapid and reliable detection of CP-CRE is critical for preventing the spread of these pathogens