Rifampin drug resistance tests for tuberculosis: challenging the gold standard

Evaluation of AAICare®-TB sequence analysis tool for accurate diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis: A comparative study with TB-Profiler and Mykrobe

A rapid and comprehensive drug susceptibility test is essential for eliminating drug resistant tuberculosis. Next generation sequencing (NGS) based susceptibility testing is being explored as a potential substitute for the conventional phenotypic and genotypic testing methods. However, the adoption of NGS based genotypic susceptibility testing depends on the availability of simple, accurate and efficient analysis tools. This preliminary study aimed to evaluate the performance of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) genome analysis pipeline, AAICare®-TB, for susceptibility prediction, in comparison to two widely used gDST prediction tools, TB-Profiler and Mykrobe. This study was performed in a National Reference Laboratory in India on presumptive drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) isolates. Whole genome sequences of the 120 cultured isolates were obtained through Illumina sequencing on a MiSeq platform. Raw sequences were simultaneously analysed using the three tools. Susceptibility prediction reports thus generated, were compared to estimate the total concordance and discordance. WHO mutation catalogue (1st edition, 2021) was used as the reference standard for categorizing the mutations. In this study, AAICare®-TB was able to predict drug resistance status for First Line (Streptomycin, Isoniazid, Rifampicin, Ethambutol and Pyrazinamide) and Second Line drugs (Fluoroquinolones, Second Line Injectables and Ethionamide) in 93 samples along with lineage and hetero-resistance as per the WHO guidelines.

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

One of predominant contributors to global mortality is tuberculosis (TB), an infection caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). Inappropriate and ineffectual treatment can lead to the development of drug-resistant TB. One of the most common forms of drug-resistant TB is multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), caused by mutations in the rpoB and katG genes that lead to resistance to anti-TB drugs, rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH), respectively. Although culturing remains the gold standard, it is not rapid thereby delaying potential treatment and potentially increasing the incidence of MDR-TB. In contrast, molecular techniques provide a highly sensitive and specific alternative. This review discusses the classification of biomarkers used to detect MDR-TB, some of the commonly used anti-TB drugs, and DNA mutations in MTB that lead to anti-TB resistance. The objective of this review is to increase awareness of the need for rapid and precise detection of MDR-TB cases to decrease morbidity and mortality of this infectious disease worldwide.

Exploring diagnostic methods for drug-resistant tuberculosis: A comprehensive overview

Despite available global efforts and funding, Tuberculosis (TB) continues to affect a considerable number of patients worldwide. Policy makers and stakeholders set clear goals to reduce TB incidence and mortality, but the emergence of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) complicate the reach of these goals. Drug-resistance TB needs to be diagnosed rapidly and accurately to effectively treat patients, prevent the transmission of MDR-TB, minimise mortality, reduce treatment costs and avoid unnecessary hospitalisations. In this narrative review, we provide a comprehensive overview of laboratory methods for detecting drug resistance in MTB, focusing on phenotypic, molecular and other drug susceptibility testing (DST) techniques. We found a large variety of methods used, with the BACTEC MGIT 960 being the most common phenotypic DST and the Xpert MTB/RIF being the most common molecular DST. We emphasise the importance of integrating phenotypic and molecular DST to address issues like resistance to new drugs, heteroresistance, mixed infections and low-level resistance mutations. Notably, most of the analysed studies adhered to the outdated definition of XDR-TB and did not consider the pre-XDR definition, thus posing challenges in aligning diagnostic methods with the current landscape of TB resistance.

Dual-centre evaluation of the FluoroType MTBDR version 2 assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and resistance-conferring mutations in pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples from Denmark, Germany and Sierra Leone

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the ability of FluoroType MTBDR version 2 (FTv2; Hain Lifescience), a second-step real-time PCR assay, to simultaneously detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) DNA and mutations conferring resistance to rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH), in pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples from patients and compared them with corresponding cultures.

METHODS

FTv2 MTBC was evaluated on 1815 and 432 samples from Denmark (DK) and Germany (DE), respectively. RIF and INH resistance mutations were assessed in the German samples and 110 samples from Sierra Leone and subsequently compared to phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing and a composite reference DNA (CRD) based on the GenoType MTBDR line-probe assay and Sanger sequencing or whole-genome sequencing.

RESULTS

Of the 584 (557 smear-negative) Danish and 277 (85 smear-negative) German sputum samples, 42 (16) and 246 (54) were culture positive, and 44 (18) and 222 (35) were FTv2 positive, providing an FTv2 sensitivity and specificity of 0.86 (0.63) and 0.98 (DK), 0.90 (0.65) and 1.00 (DE), respectively. The count, sensitivities, and specificities for all pulmonary samples were 1434, 0.79, and 0.99 (DK) and 347, 0.86, and 1.00 (DE), respectively; for extrapulmonary samples, 381, 0.33, 0.99 (DK) and 83, 0.50, and 1.00 (DE). The valid count, sensitivity, and specificity compared with CRD for detecting resistance mutations were RIF 355, 0.99, 0.96, and INH 340, 1.00, and 0.98, respectively.

DISCUSSION

FTv2 reliably detects MTBC DNA in pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples and detects resistance mutations for INH and RIF resistance in inhA promoter, katG, and rpoB genes.

Rapid detection of multidrug resistance in tuberculosis using nanopore-based targeted next-generation sequencing: a multicenter, double-blind study

Background

Resistance to anti-tuberculous drugs is a major challenge in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB). We aimed to evaluate the clinical availability of nanopore-based targeted next-generation sequencing (NanoTNGS) for the diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB).

Methods

This study enrolled 253 patients with suspected DR-TB from six hospitals. The diagnostic efficacy of NanoTNGS for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis and its susceptibility or resistance to first- and second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs was assessed by comparing conventional phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) and Xpert MTB/RIF assays. NanoTNGS can be performed within 12 hours from DNA extraction to the result delivery.

Results

NanoTNGS showed a remarkable concordance rate of 99.44% (179/180) with the culture assay for identifying the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. The sensitivity of NanoTNGS for detecting drug resistance was 93.53% for rifampicin, 89.72% for isoniazid, 85.45% for ethambutol, 74.00% for streptomycin, and 88.89% for fluoroquinolones. Specificities ranged from 83.33% to 100% for all drugs tested. Sensitivity for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis using NanoTNGS increased by 9.73% compared to Xpert MTB/RIF. The most common mutations were S531L (codon in E. coli) in the rpoB gene, S315T in the katG gene, and M306V in the embB gene, conferring resistance to rifampicin, isoniazid, and ethambutol, respectively. In addition, mutations in the pncA gene, potentially contributing to pyrazinamide resistance, were detected in 32 patients. Other prevalent variants, including D94G in the gyrA gene and K43R in the rpsL gene, conferred resistance to fluoroquinolones and streptomycin, respectively. Furthermore, the rv0678 R94Q mutation was detected in one sample, indicating potential resistance to bedaquiline.

Conclusion

NanoTNGS rapidly and accurately identifies resistance or susceptibility to anti-TB drugs, outperforming traditional methods. Clinical implementation of the technique can recognize DR-TB in time and provide guidance for choosing appropriate antituberculosis agents.

Optimising machine learning prediction of minimum inhibitory concentrations in Klebsiella pneumoniae

Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) are the gold standard for quantitatively measuring antibiotic resistance. However, lab-based MIC determination can be time-consuming and suffers from low reproducibility, and interpretation as sensitive or resistant relies on guidelines which change over time. Genome sequencing and machine learning promise to allow in silico MIC prediction as an alternative approach which overcomes some of these difficulties, albeit the interpretation of MIC is still needed. Nevertheless, precisely how we should handle MIC data when dealing with predictive models remains unclear, since they are measured semi-quantitatively, with varying resolution, and are typically also left- and right-censored within varying ranges. We therefore investigated genome-based prediction of MICs in the pathogen Klebsiella pneumoniae using 4367 genomes with both simulated semi-quantitative traits and real MICs. As we were focused on clinical interpretation, we used interpretable rather than black-box machine learning models, namely, Elastic Net, Random Forests, and linear mixed models. Simulated traits were generated accounting for oligogenic, polygenic, and homoplastic genetic effects with different levels of heritability. Then we assessed how model prediction accuracy was affected when MICs were framed as regression and classification. Our results showed that treating the MICs differently depending on the number of concentration levels of antibiotic available was the most promising learning strategy. Specifically, to optimise both prediction accuracy and inference of the correct causal variants, we recommend considering the MICs as continuous and framing the learning problem as a regression when the number of observed antibiotic concentration levels is large, whereas with a smaller number of concentration levels they should be treated as a categorical variable and the learning problem should be framed as a classification. Our findings also underline how predictive models can be improved when prior biological knowledge is taken into account, due to the varying genetic architecture of each antibiotic resistance trait. Finally, we emphasise that incrementing the population database is pivotal for the future clinical implementation of these models to support routine machine-learning based diagnostics.

Optimizing the use of current antituberculosis drugs to overcome drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Antibiotic-resistant tuberculosis continues to be one of the major threats to global tuberculosis control. After a hiatus of over 40 years in antituberculosis drug development, the last decade has seen a resurgence of research, yielding a number of promising compounds in the tuberculosis drug pipeline, with some that are now game changers in the treatment of MDRTB. Despite this progress, there are still obstacles restricting the use of these molecules as first-line drugs. The quick appearance of bacteria resistant to these new treatments highlights a continuing need to fuel the discovery and development of new molecules. With this in mind, alternative strategies aimed at optimizing the utilization of existing antituberculosis agents are currently under evaluation. They are focused on enhancing the efficacy of antibiotics against their bacterial targets, primarily by augmenting the quantity of antibiotic that engages with these targets. This objective can be achieved through two primary approaches: (1) Provided that toxicity concerns are not a limiting factor, increased dosing is a viable avenue, as demonstrated by rifampicin, isoniazid, and fluoroquinolones, for which escalated dosing has been effective; and (2) Employing enhancers such as drug activator boosters (ethionamide), efflux pump inhibitors, or hydrolytic enzyme inhibitors (kanamycin) can elevate the concentration of antibiotics in bacterial cells. These strategies offer the potential to mitigate antibiotic obsolescence and complement the discovery of new antibiotics.

Phenotype versus genotype discordant rifampicin susceptibility testing in tuberculosis: implications for a diagnostic accuracy

IMPORTANCE

An accurate diagnosis of drug resistance in clinical isolates is an important step for better treatment outcomes. The current study observed a higher discordance rate of rifampicin resistance on Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) drug susceptibility testing (DST) than Lowenstein-Jenson (LJ) DST when compared with the rpoB sequencing. We detected a few novel mutations and their combination in rifampicin resistance isolates that were missed by MGIT DST and may be useful for the better management of tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcomes. Few novel deletions in clinical isolates necessitate the importance of rpoB sequencing in large data sets in geographic-specific locations, especially high-burden countries. We explored the discordance rate on MGIT and LJ, which is important for the clinical management of rifampicin resistance to avoid the mistreatment of drug-resistant TB. Furthermore, MGIT-sensitive isolates may be subjected to molecular methods of diagnosis for further confirmation and treatment options.

Effects of sputum bacillary load and age on GeneXpert and traditional methods in pulmonary tuberculosis: a 4-year retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of the GeneXpert® MTB/RIF (Xpert®), Auramine O staining method, and Lowenstein-Jensen medium for bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis and explore the effects of the sputum bacillary load (SBL) and qRT‒PCR threshold cycle (Ct) value on the detection methods.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the results in the Department of Infectious Disease for 49 months. The χ2 test was used to compare the performances of each method, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off values, and the factors associated with a false-negative result from Xpert® were analysed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Simultaneous analysis of 980 sputum specimens showed that the positive detection rate of Xpert® did not increase with increasing SBL, and there were differences between the three when SBL ≤ 1 + (all P < 0.05). There was a good negative correlation between the Ct value and the SBL (P < 0.0001). Age was an independent risk factor for false-negative Xpert® results (P = 0.029), and when Ct < 16, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were both 100.00%. The optimal cut-off Ct values for resegmentation based on the drug resistance classification were < 18.6, 18.6-34.1, and > 34.1 cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

Xpert® was not affected by SBL but it was by age, and it is more advantageous when SBL ≤ 1 + . The results regarding rifampicin resistance were reliable, and the novel Ct segmentation was a practical and more clinically meaningful classification method for diagnosing rifampicin resistance. These findings will help improve physicians' ability to accurately diagnose TB.

Phenotypic drug susceptibility characterization and clinical outcomes of tuberculosis strains with A-probe mutation by GeneXpert MTB/RIF

BACKGROUND

GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay was applied widely to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and rifampicin resistance.

METHODS

Retrospectively investigated the association among treatment histories, phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) results, and clinical outcomes of patients infected with probe A absent mutation isolate confirmed by Xpert.

RESULTS

63 patients with only probe A absent mutation and 40 with additional pDST results were analyzed. 24 (60.0%) patients had molecular-phenotypic discordant rifampicin (RIF) susceptibility testing results, including 12 (12/13, 92.3%) new tuberculosis (TB) patients and 12 (12/27, 44.4%) retreated ones. 28 (28/39, 71.8%) retreated patients received first-line treatment regime within two years with failed outcomes. New patients had better treatment outcomes than retreated ones (successful: 83.3% VS. 53.8%; P value = 0.02). The clinical results of RIF-susceptible TB confirmed by pDST were not better than RIF-resistant TB (successful: 62.5% VS. 50.0%; P value = 0.43). INH-resistant TB and INH-susceptible TB had similar treatment outcomes too (successful: 61.5% VS. 50.0%; P value = 0.48). 11 (11/12, 91.7%) new patients treated with the short treatment regimen (STR) had successful outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of mono probe A absent isolates had RIF molecular-phenotypic discordance results, especially in new patients. Probe A mutations were significantly associated with unsuccessful clinical outcomes, whether the pDST results were RIF susceptible or not. STR was the best choice for new patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

retrospectively registered in Wuhan Jinyintan Hospital (No. 2021-KY-16).

Lineage classification and antitubercular drug resistance surveillance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by whole-genome sequencing in Southern India

Whole-genome sequencing has created a revolution in tuberculosis management by providing a comprehensive picture of the various genetic polymorphisms with unprecedented accuracy. Studies mapping genomic heterogeneity in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using a whole-genome sequencing approach from high tuberculosis burden countries are underrepresented. We report whole-genome sequencing results of 242 clinical isolates of culture-confirmed M. tuberculosis isolates from tuberculosis patients referred to a tertiary care hospital in Southern India. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the isolates in our study belonged to five different lineages, with Indo-Oceanic (lineage 1, n = 122) and East-African Indian (lineage 3, n = 80) being the most prevalent. We report several mutations in genes conferring resistance to first and second line antitubercular drugs including the genes rpoB, katG, ahpC, inhA, fabG1, embB, pncA, rpsL, rrs, and gyrA. The majority of these mutations were identified in relatively high proportions in lineage 1. Our study highlights the utility of whole-genome sequencing as a potential supplemental tool to the existing genotypic and phenotypic methods, in providing expedited comprehensive surveillance of mutations that may be associated with antitubercular drug resistance as well as lineage characterization of M. tuberculosis isolates. Further larger-scale whole-genome datasets with linked minimum inhibition concentration testing are imperative for resolving the discrepancies between whole-genome sequencing and phenotypic drug sensitivity testing results and quantifying the level of the resistance associated with the mutations for optimization of antitubercular drug and precise dose selection in clinics. IMPORTANCE Studies mapping genetic heterogeneity of clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis for determining their strain lineage and drug resistance by whole-genome sequencing are limited in high tuberculosis burden settings. We carried out whole-genome sequencing of 242 M. tuberculosis isolates from drug-sensitive and drug-resistant tuberculosis patients, identified and collected as part of the TB Portals Program, to have a comprehensive insight into the genetic diversity of M. tuberculosis in Southern India. We report several genetic variations in M. tuberculosis that may confer resistance to antitubercular drugs. Further wide-scale efforts are required to fully characterize M. tuberculosis genetic diversity at a population level in high tuberculosis burden settings for providing precise tuberculosis treatment.

Borderline rpoB mutations transmit at the same rate as common rpoB mutations in a tuberculosis cohort in Bangladesh

The spread of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a growing problem in many countries worldwide. Resistance to one of the primary first-line drugs, rifampicin, is caused by mutations in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis rpoB gene. So-called borderline rpoB mutations confer low-level resistance, in contrast to more common rpoB mutations which confer high-level resistance. While some borderline mutations show lower fitness in vitro than common mutations, their in vivo fitness is currently unknown. We used a dataset of 394 whole genome sequenced MDR-TB isolates from Bangladesh, representing around 44 % of notified MDR-TB cases over 6 years, to look at differences in transmission clustering between isolates with borderline rpoB mutations and those with common rpoB mutations. We found a relatively low percentage of transmission clustering in the dataset (34.8 %) but no difference in clustering between different types of rpoB mutations. Compensatory mutations in rpoA, rpoB, and rpoC were associated with higher levels of transmission clustering as were lineages two, three, and four relative to lineage one. Young people as well as patients with high sputum smear positive TB were more likely to be in a transmission cluster. Our findings show that although borderline rpoB mutations have lower in vitro growth potential this does not translate into lower transmission potential or in vivo fitness. Proper detection of these mutations is crucial to ensure they do not go unnoticed and spread MDR-TB within communities.

GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra performance to detect uncommon rpoB mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the performance of GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra to accurately detect rifampicin resistance for less common rpoB mutations that potentially confer phenotypic resistance, we tested 28 such Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures with Xpert Ultra.

RESULTS

They represented 22 different (combinations of) rpoB mutations. Of 28 isolates tested, one was reported by Xpert Ultra as "No rifampicin resistance detected", 8 yielded a "Rifampicin indeterminate" result, and 19 were identified as rifampicin resistant. Overall, our results corroborate previous observations on the "Indeterminate" results for mutations at codon 432, while we add Lys446Gln as additional "Indeterminate" result and Pro439Leu as a false rifampicin-susceptible result. Furthermore, we document other uncommon point mutations and indels across the rpoB gene that are mostly correctly identified as rifampicin resistant by Xpert ultra (V3). Taken together, "Indeterminate" results in Xpert Ultra may indicate underlying rpoB mutations within the rifampicin-resistance determining region and thus increase the post-test probability of rifampicin resistance, albeit to an unknown extent.

Clinical implications of molecular drug resistance testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a 2023 TBnet/RESIST-TB consensus statement

Drug-resistant tuberculosis is a substantial health-care concern worldwide. Despite culture-based methods being considered the gold standard for drug susceptibility testing, molecular methods provide rapid information about the Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutations associated with resistance to anti-tuberculosis drugs. This consensus document was developed on the basis of a comprehensive literature search, by the TBnet and RESIST-TB networks, about reporting standards for the clinical use of molecular drug susceptibility testing. Review and the search for evidence included hand-searching journals and searching electronic databases. The panel identified studies that linked mutations in genomic regions of M tuberculosis with treatment outcome data. Implementation of molecular testing for the prediction of drug resistance in M tuberculosis is key. Detection of mutations in clinical isolates has implications for the clinical management of patients with multidrug-resistant or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, especially in situations when phenotypic drug susceptibility testing is not available. A multidisciplinary team including clinicians, microbiologists, and laboratory scientists reached a consensus on key questions relevant to molecular prediction of drug susceptibility or resistance to M tuberculosis, and their implications for clinical practice. This consensus document should help clinicians in the management of patients with tuberculosis, providing guidance for the design of treatment regimens and optimising outcomes.

Performance Evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 System for Rifampin Drug-Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Using the Current WHO Critical Concentration

The World Health Organization recently lowered the rifampin (RIF) critical concentration (CC) for drug-susceptibility testing (DST) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) using the mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) 960 system. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the MGIT system with the revised CC for determining MTBC RIF resistance with 303 clinical MTBC isolates, including 122 isolates with rpoB mutations, of which 32 had single borderline-resistance mutations, and 181 wild-type rpoB isolates. The phenotypic RIF resistance was determined via the absolute concentration method (AC) and via MGIT using both previous (1 mg/L) and revised (0.5 mg/L) CCs for the latter method. The diagnostic accuracy of each phenotypic DST (pDST) was assessed based on rpoB genotyping as the reference standard. The overall sensitivity of the AC was 95.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.6 to 98.2%), while the MGIT results with previous and revised CCs were 82.0% (95% CI 74.0 to 88.3%) and 83.6% (95% CI 75.8 to 89.7%), respectively. The 32 MTBC isolates with single borderline-resistance mutations showed a wide range of MICs, and sensitivity was not significantly increased by reducing the MGIT CC. All 181 wild-type rpoB isolates were RIF-susceptible in the AC and with MGIT using the previous CC, whereas 1 isolate was misclassified as RIF-resistant with the revised CC. Our results demonstrate that the overall diagnostic performances of the MGIT DST with the revised RIF CC and previous CC were comparable. A further large-scale study is required to demonstrate the optimal RIF CC for MGIT.

Tuberkulose im Erwachsenenalter

Die Tuberkulose ist in Deutschland eine seltene, überwiegend gut behandelbare Erkrankung. Weltweit ist sie eine der häufigsten Infektionserkrankungen mit ca. 10 Millionen Neuerkrankungen/Jahr. Auch bei einer niedrigen Inzidenz in Deutschland bleibt Tuberkulose insbesondere aufgrund der internationalen Entwicklungen und Migrationsbewegungen eine wichtige Differenzialdiagnose. In Deutschland besteht, aufgrund der niedrigen Prävalenz der Erkrankung und der damit verbundenen abnehmenden klinischen Erfahrung, ein Informationsbedarf zu allen Aspekten der Tuberkulose und ihrer Kontrolle. Diese Leitlinie umfasst die mikrobiologische Diagnostik, die Grundprinzipien der Standardtherapie, die Behandlung verschiedener Organmanifestationen, den Umgang mit typischen unerwünschten Arzneimittelwirkungen, die Besonderheiten in der Diagnostik und Therapie resistenter Tuberkulose sowie die Behandlung bei TB-HIV-Koinfektion. Sie geht darüber hinaus auf Versorgungsaspekte und gesetzliche Regelungen wie auch auf die Diagnosestellung und präventive Therapie einer latenten tuberkulösen Infektion ein. Es wird ausgeführt, wann es der Behandlung durch spezialisierte Zentren bedarf.

Die Aktualisierung der S2k-Leitlinie „Tuberkulose im Erwachsenenalter“ soll allen in der Tuberkuloseversorgung Tätigen als Richtschnur für die Prävention, die Diagnose und die Therapie der Tuberkulose dienen und helfen, den heutigen Herausforderungen im Umgang mit Tuberkulose in Deutschland gewachsen zu sein.

Pyrazinamide resistance in rifampicin discordant tuberculosis

Introduction

Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains with phenotypically susceptible rpoB mutations (rifampicin discordant) have emerged following implementation of rapid molecular drug resistance testing for tuberculosis. Whilst rifampicin resistance is known to be associated with resistance to other rifamycins (rifapentine and rifabutin) as well as isoniazid and pyrazinamide, rifampicin discordant strains have shown high rates of susceptibility to isoniazid and rifabutin. However, pyrazinamide susceptibly testing results have not been reported.

Materials and methods

We evaluated pyrazinamide resistance in 80 rifampicin discordant and 25 rifampicin and isoniazid susceptible isolates from KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa using Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube method and sequencing of the pncA. We also compared susceptibility of pyrazinamide with that of isoniazid.

Results

Pyrazinamide resistance was found in 6/80 (7.5%) rifampicin discordant isolates. All pyrazinamide resistant isolates were also resistant to isoniazid and pyrazinamide resistance was found to be associated with isoniazid resistance. No pyrazinamide resistance was found among the isoniazid susceptible isolates.

Conclusion

Given the low prevalence of pyrazinamide resistance in rifampicin discordant TB, this anti-TB drug still has a significant role in the treatment of these patients. Performing pyrazinamide susceptibility testing remains a challenge, our findings show that isoniazid susceptible isolates are unlikely to be resistant to pyrazinamide among the discordant TB isolates.

Evaluation of whole-genome sequence to predict drug resistance of nine anti-tuberculosis drugs and characterize resistance genes in clinical rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Ningbo, China

Setting

Controlling drug-resistant tuberculosis in Ningbo, China.

Objective

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has not been employed to comprehensively study Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates, especially rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, in Ningbo, China. Here, we aim to characterize genes involved in drug resistance in RR-TB and create a prognostic tool for successfully predicting drug resistance in patients with TB.

Design

Drug resistance was predicted by WGS in a "TB-Profiler" web service after phenotypic drug susceptibility tests (DSTs) against nine anti-TB drugs among 59 clinical isolates. A comparison of consistency, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values between WGS and DST were carried out for each drug.

Results

The sensitivities and specificities for WGS were 95.92 and 90% for isoniazid (INH), 100 and 64.1% for ethambutol (EMB), 97.37 and 100% for streptomycin (SM), 75 and 100% for amikacin (AM), 80 and 96.3%for capreomycin (CAP), 100 and 97.22% for levofloxacin (LFX), 93.33 and 90.91% for prothionamide (PTO), and 70 and 97.96% for para-aminosalicylic acid (PAS). Around 53 (89.83%) and 6 (10.17%) of the isolates belonged to lineage two (East-Asian) and lineage four (Euro-American), respectively.

Conclusion

Whole-genome sequencing is a reliable method for predicting resistance to INH, RIF, EMB, SM, AM, CAP, LFX, PTO, and PAS with high consistency, sensitivity, and specificity. There was no transmission that occurred among the patients with RR-TB in Ningbo, China.

Tuberculosis Phenotypic and Genotypic Drug Susceptibility Testing and Immunodiagnostics: A Review

Tuberculosis (TB), considered an ancient disease, is still killing one person every 21 seconds. Diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) still has many challenges, especially in low and middle-income countries with high burden disease rates. Over the last two decades, the amount of drug-resistant (DR)-TB cases has been increasing, from mono-resistant (mainly for isoniazid or rifampicin resistance) to extremely drug resistant TB. DR-TB is problematic to diagnose and treat, and thus, needs more resources to manage it. Together with+ TB clinical symptoms, phenotypic and genotypic diagnosis of TB includes a series of tests that can be used on different specimens to determine if a person has TB, as well as if the M.tb strain+ causing the disease is drug susceptible or resistant. Here, we review and discuss advantages and disadvantages of phenotypic vs. genotypic drug susceptibility testing for DR-TB, advances in TB immunodiagnostics, and propose a call to improve deployable and low-cost TB diagnostic tests to control the DR-TB burden, especially in light of the increase of the global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance, and the potentially long term impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disruption on TB programs.

Minos: variant adjudication and joint genotyping of cohorts of bacterial genomes

There are many short-read variant-calling tools, with different strengths and weaknesses. We present a tool, Minos, which combines outputs from arbitrary variant callers, increasing recall without loss of precision. We benchmark on 62 samples from three bacterial species and an outbreak of 385 Mycobacterium tuberculosis samples. Minos also enables joint genotyping; we demonstrate on a large (N=13k) M. tuberculosis cohort, building a map of non-synonymous SNPs and indels in a region where all such variants are assumed to cause rifampicin resistance. We quantify the correlation with phenotypic resistance and then replicate in a second cohort (N=10k).

Utility of line probe assay in detecting drug resistance and the associated mutations in patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Introduction

Molecular tests allow rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug resistance in a few days. Identifying the mutations in genes associated with drug resistance may contribute to the development of appropriate interventions to improve tuberculosis control. So far, there is little information in Ethiopia about the diagnostic performance of line probe assay (LPA) and the M. tuberculosis common gene mutations associated with drug resistance in extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Thus, this study aimed to assess the frequency of drug resistance-associated mutations in patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) and to compare the agreement and determine the utility of the genotypic in the detection of drug resistance in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on stored M. tuberculosis isolates. The genotypic and phenotypic drug susceptibility tests were performed using LPA and BACTEC-MGIT-960, respectively. The common mutations were noted, and the agreement and the utility of the LPA were determined using the BACTEC-MGIT-960 as a gold standard.

Results

Of the 151 isolates, the sensitivity and specificity of MTBDRplus in detecting isoniazid resistance were 90.9% and 100%, respectively. While for rifampicin, it was 100% and 99.3% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively. The katG S315Tl was the most common mutation observed in 85.7% of the isoniazid-resistant isolates. In the case of rifampicin, the most common mutation (61.9%) was observed at position rpoB S531L. Mutations in the gyrA promoter region were strongly associated with Levofloxacin and Moxifloxacin resistance.

Conclusion

Line probe assay has high test performance in detecting resistance to anti-TB drugs in EPTB isolates. The MTBDRplus test was slightly less sensitive for the detection of isoniazid resistance as compared to the detection of rifampicin. The most prevalent mutations associated with isoniazid and rifampicin resistance were observed at katG S315Tl and rpoB S531L respectively. Besides, all the fluoroquinolone-resistant cases were associated with gyrA gene. Finally, a validation study with DNA sequencing is recommended.

Rapid molecular diagnostics of tuberculosis resistance by targeted stool sequencing

Background

Stool is an important diagnostic specimen for tuberculosis in populations who struggle to provide sputum, such as children or people living with HIV. However, the culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) complex strains from stool perform poorly. This limits the opportunity for phenotypic drug resistance testing with this specimen. Therefore, reliable molecular methods are urgently needed for comprehensive drug resistance testing on stool specimens.

Methods

We evaluated the performance of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS, Deeplex® Myc-TB) for the detection of mutations associated with M. tuberculosis complex drug resistance on DNA isolated from stool specimens provided by participants from a prospective cohort of patients treated for tuberculosis in Eswatini (n = 66; 56 with and 10 participants without M. tuberculosis complex DNA detected in stool by real-time quantitative PCR), and an independent German validation cohort of participants with culture-confirmed tuberculosis (n = 21).

Results

The tNGS assay detected M. tuberculosis complex DNA in 38 of 56 (68%) samples; for 28 of 38 (74%) samples, a full M. tuberculosis complex drug resistance prediction report was obtained. There was a high degree of concordance with sputum phenotypic drug susceptibility results (κ = 0.82). The ability to predict resistance was concentration-dependent and successful in 7/10 (70%), 18/25 (72%), and 3/21 (14%) of samples with stool PCR concentration thresholds of > 100 femtogram per microliter (fg/μl), 1 to 100 fg/μl, and < 1 fg/μl, respectively (p = 0.0004). The German cohort confirmed these results and demonstrated a similarly high concordance between stool tNGS and sputum phenotypic drug susceptibility results (κ = 0.84).

Conclusions

tNGS can identify drug resistance from stool provided by tuberculosis patients. This affords the opportunity to obtain critical diagnostic information for tuberculosis patients who struggle to provide respiratory specimens.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13073-022-01054-6.

Updating the approaches to define susceptibility and resistance to anti-tuberculosis agents: implications for diagnosis and treatment

Approximately 85 000 deaths globally in 2019 were due to drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB), which corresponds to 7% of global deaths attributable to bacterial antimicrobial resistance [1]. Yet concerns have been mounting that drug-resistant TB was being underestimated because the approaches to define susceptibility and resistance to anti-TB agents had not kept up with those used for other major bacterial pathogens [2–9]. Here, we outline the recent, evidence-based initiatives spearheaded by the World Health Organization (WHO) and others to update breakpoints (traditionally referred to as critical concentrations (CCs)) that are used for phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), also called drug susceptibility testing in the TB literature.

Inappropriately high breakpoints have resulted in systematic false-susceptible AST results to anti-TB drugs. MIC, PK/PD and clinical outcome data should be combined when setting breakpoints to minimise the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance. https://bit.ly/3i43wb6

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Whole Genome Sequencing of Drug Resistant and Drug Susceptible Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates From Tigray Region, Ethiopia

Background: Tuberculosis, mainly caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), is an ancient human disease that gravely affects millions of people annually. We wanted to explore the genetic diversity and lineage-specific association of Mtb with drug resistance among pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Methods: Sputum samples were collected from pulmonary tuberculosis patients at six different healthcare institutions in Tigray, Ethiopia, between July 2018 and August 2019. DNA was extracted from 74 Mtb complex isolates for whole-genome sequencing (WGS). All genomes were typed and screened for mutations with known associations with antimicrobial resistance using in silico methods, and results were cross-verified with wet lab methods. Results: Lineage (L) 4 (55.8%) was predominant, followed by L3 (41.2%); L1 (1.5%) and L2 (1.5%) occurred rarely. The most frequently detected sublineage was CAS (38.2%), followed by Ural (29.4%), and Haarlem (11.8%). The recent transmission index (RTI) was relatively low. L4 and Ural strains were more resistant than the other strains to any anti-TB drug (P < 0.05). The most frequent mutations to RIF, INH, EMB, SM, PZA, ETH, FLQs, and 2nd-line injectable drugs occurred at rpoB S450L, katG S315T, embB M306I/V, rpsL K43R, pncA V139A, ethA M1R, gyrA D94G, and rrs A1401G, respectively. Disputed rpoB mutations were also shown in four (16%) of RIF-resistant isolates. Conclusion: Our WGS analysis revealed the presence of diverse Mtb genotypes. The presence of a significant proportion of disputed rpoB mutations highlighted the need to establish a WGS facility at the regional level to monitor drug-resistant mutations. This will help control the transmission of DR-TB and ultimately contribute to the attainment of 100% DST coverage for TB patients as per the End TB strategy.

A Comprehensive Evaluation of GeneLEAD VIII DNA Platform Combined to Deeplex Myc-TB® Assay to Detect in 8 Days Drug Resistance to 13 Antituberculous Drugs and Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Directly From Clinical Samples

The GeneLEAD VIII (Diagenode, Belgium) is a new, fully automated, sample-to-result precision instrument for the extraction of DNA and PCR detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) directly from clinical samples. The Deeplex Myc-TB^® assay (Genoscreen, France) is a diagnostic kit based on the deep sequencing of a 24-plexed amplicon mix allowing simultaneously the detection of resistance to 13 antituberculous (antiTB) drugs and the determination of spoligotype. We evaluated the performance of a strategy combining the both mentioned tools to detect directly from clinical samples, in 8 days, MTBC and its resistance to 13 antiTB drugs, and identify potential transmission of strains from patient-to-patient. Using this approach, we screened 112 clinical samples (65 smear-negative) and 94 MTBC cultured strains. The sensitivity and the specificity of the GeneLEAD/Deeplex Myc-TB approach for MTBC detection were 79.3% and 100%, respectively. One hundred forty successful Deeplex Myc-TB results were obtained for 46 clinical samples and 94 strains, a total of 85.4% of which had a Deeplex Myc-TB susceptibility and resistance prediction consistent with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST). Importantly, the Deeplex Myc-TB assay was able to detect 100% of the multidrug-resistant (MDR) MTBC tested. The lowest concordance rates were for pyrazinamide, ethambutol, streptomycin, and ethionamide (84.5%, 81.5%, 73%, and 55%, respectively) for which the determination of susceptibility or resistance is generally difficult with current tools. One of the main difficulties of Deeplex Myc-TB is to interpret the non-synonymous uncharacterized variants that can represent up to 30% of the detected single nucleotide variants. We observed a good level of concordance between Deeplex Myc-TB-spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR despite a lower discriminatory power for spoligotyping. The median time to obtain complete results from clinical samples was 8 days (IQR 7–13) provided a high-throughput NGS sequencing platform was available. Our results highlight that the GeneLEAD/Deeplex Myc-TB approach could be a breakthrough in rapid diagnosis of MDR TB in routine practice.

Molecular characterization of rpoB gene mutations in isolates from tuberculosis patients in Cubal, Republic of Angola

Background

The importance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains with disputed rpoB mutations remains to be defined. This study aimed to assess the frequency and types of rpoB mutations in M. tuberculosis isolates from Cubal, Angola, a country with a high incidence of tuberculosis.

Methods

All isolates included (n = 308) were analyzed using phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and GenoType MTBDRplus assay. DNA sequencing of the rpoB gene and determination of rifampicin MIC by macrodilution method were additionally performed on isolates yielding discordant results (n = 12) and those in which the mutation detected was not characterized (n = 8).

Results

In total, 85.1% (74/87) of rifampicin-resistant strains had undisputed rpoB mutations -S450L (49), D435V (15), H445D (3), H445Y (2), Q432ins (1), L449M plus S450F (1), S450F (1), S450W (1) and S450Y (1)-; 10.3% (9/87) had disputed rpoB mutations—L430P plus S493L (1), N437del (1), H445L (3), D435Y (2), L452P (2)-, 2.3% (2.3%) showed no rpoB mutations and 2.3% (2/87) showed heteroresistance—D435Y plus L452P and L430P plus S493L-.

Conclusion

Disputed rpoB mutations were common, occurring in 10.3% of rifampicin resistant isolates. Current phenotyping techniques may be unable to detect this resistance pattern. To increase their sensitivity, a lower concentration of RIF could be used in these tests or alternatively, rpoB mutations could be screened and characterized in all M. tuberculosis strains.

Disputed rpoB Mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes

Discordant results between genotypic drug susceptibility testing (gDST) and phenotypic DST (pDST) for Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with disputed (discordance between gDST and pDST results) mutations affect rifampin (RIF)-resistant (RR) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) treatments due to a lack of practical clinical guidelines. To investigate the role of disputed rpoB mutations in M. tuberculosis and TB treatment outcomes, initial isolates of 837 clinical RR- or MDR-TB cases confirmed during 2014 to 2018 were retested using agar-based RIF pDST and rpoB gene sequencing. MICs were determined for isolates with disputed rpoB mutations. Disputed rpoB mutations were identified in 77 (9.2%) M. tuberculosis isolates, including 50 (64.9%) and 14 (18.2%) phenotypically RIF- and rifabutin (RFB)-resistant isolates, respectively. The predominant single mutations were those encoding L533P (a change of L to P at position 533) (44.2%) and L511P (20.8%). Most of the isolates harboring mutations encoding L511P (87.5%), H526N (100%), D516Y (70.0%), and L533P (63.6%) had MICs of ≤1 mg/liter, whereas isolates harboring the mutation encoding H526L (75%) had a MIC of >1 mg/liter. Of the 63 cases with treatment outcomes available, 11 (17.5%) cases died, 1 (1.6%) case transferred out, and 51 (81%) cases had favorable outcomes, including 8 and 20 cases treated with standard-dose RIF- and RFB-containing regimens, respectively. Excluding cases that transferred out or received no or 1-day treatment, we observed statistically significant differences between the outcomes using active and inactive fluoroquinolones (FQs) (P = 0.008, odds ratio = 0.05 [95% confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.38]) in 57 cases (where active means a case susceptible to the drug and inactive means a case resistant to the drug or drug not used). We concluded that disputed rpoB mutations are not rare. Depending on the resources available, sequencing and/or MIC testing is recommended for better management of RR- and MDR-TB cases.

Discordance of the Repeat GeneXpert MTB/RIF Test for Rifampicin Resistance Detection Among Patients Initiating MDR-TB Treatment in Uganda

BACKGROUND

The Global Laboratory Initiative (GLI) guidelines recommend repeat for GeneXpertMTB/RIF (XpertMTB/RIF) in patients with a low pretest probability of rifampicin resistance (RR).

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study using results of sputum specimens collected from participants screened for the STREAM 2 trial. We recruited all patients with XpertMTB/RIF RR-TB detected who were referred for RR/multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB treatment initiation at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, between September 2017 and October 2019. At baseline, smear microscopy, repeat XpertMTB/RIF, Xpert Ultra, and MTBDRplus assays were done on sputum specimens. Culture-based drug susceptibility testing (DST) was performed on discordant specimens. We analyzed the prevalence and factors associated with discordance between initial and repeat XpertMTB/RIF RR and false XpertMTB/RIF RR. False XpertMTB/RIF RR was defined as no RR detected by any of Xpert Ultra, LPA, or culture DST (reference comparator).

RESULTS

A total of 126/130 patients had repeat XpertMTB/RIF results, of whom 97 (77.0%) had M. tuberculosis detected, 81 (83.5%) had RR detected, and 1 (1.0%) had RR indeterminate. The prevalence of discordant XpertMTB/RIF RR was 15/96 (15.6%), whereas false XpertMTB/RIF RR prevalence was 10/96 (10.4%).Low-bacillary load sputum specimens were more likely to have discordant XpertMTB/RIF RR and false XpertMTB/RIF RR results (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.04; 95% CI, 0.00-0.37; P = .01; aOR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01-0.35; P = .01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show a high false-positive rifampicin resistance rate in low-TB burden patients, which calls for repeat testing in order to prevent unnecessary prescription of anti-MDR-TB therapy.

Thin-Layer-Agar-Based Direct Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility Testing on Sputum in Eswatini Rapidly Detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis Growth and Rifampicin Resistance Otherwise Missed by WHO-Endorsed Diagnostic Tests

Xpert MTB/RIF rapidly detects resistance to rifampicin (RR); however, this test misses I491F-RR conferring rpoB mutation, common in southern Africa. In addition, Xpert MTB/RIF does not distinguish between viable and dead Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). We aimed to investigate the ability of thin-layer agar (TLA) direct drug-susceptibility testing (DST) to detect MTB and its drug-resistance profiles in field conditions in Eswatini. Consecutive samples were tested in parallel with Xpert MTB/RIF and TLA for rifampicin (1.0 μg/ml) and ofloxacin (2.0 μg/ml). TLA results were compared at the Reference Laboratory in Antwerp with indirect-DST on Löwenstein-Jensen or 7H11 solid media and additional phenotypic and genotypic testing to resolve discordance. TLA showed a positivity rate for MTB detection of 7.1% versus 10.0% for Xpert MTB/RIF. Of a total of 4,547 samples included in the study, 200 isolates were available for comparison to the composite reference. Within a median of 18.4 days, TLA detected RR with 93.0% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.4 to 98.0) and 99.4% specificity (95% CI, 96.7 to 99.9) versus 62.5% (95% CI, 42.7 to 78.8) and 99.3% (95% CI, 96.2 to 99.9) for Xpert MTB/RIF. Eight isolates, 28.6% of all RR-confirmed isolates, carried the I491F mutation, all detected by TLA. TLA also correctly identified 183 of the 184 ofloxacin-susceptible isolates (99.5% specificity; 95% CI, 97.0 to 99.9). In field conditions, TLA rapidly detects RR, and in this specific setting, it contributed to detection of additional RR patients over Xpert MTB/RIF, mainly but not exclusively due to I491F. TLA also accurately excluded fluoroquinolone resistance.

Multicenter Study of the Accuracy of the BD MAX Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis Assay for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex and Mutations Associated With Resistance to Rifampin and Isoniazid

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) control is hindered by absence of rapid tests to identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and detect isoniazid (INH) and rifampin (RIF) resistance. We evaluated the accuracy of the BD MAX multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB assay (BD MAX) in South Africa, Uganda, India, and Peru.

METHODS

Outpatient adults with signs/symptoms of pulmonary TB were prospectively enrolled. Sputum smear microscopy and BD MAX were performed on a single raw sputum, which was then processed for culture and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST), BD MAX, and Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert).

RESULTS

1053 participants with presumptive TB were enrolled (47% female; 32% with human immunodeficiency virus). In patients with confirmed TB, BD MAX sensitivity was 93% (262/282 [95% CI, 89-95%]); specificity was 97% (593/610 [96-98%]) among participants with negative cultures on raw sputa. BD MAX sensitivity was 100% (175/175 [98-100%]) for smear-positive samples (fluorescence microscopy), and 81% (87/107 [73-88%]) in smear-negative samples. Among participants with both BD MAX and Xpert, sensitivity was 91% (249/274 [87-94%]) for BD MAX and 90% (246/274 [86-93%]) for Xpert on processed sputa. Sensitivity and specificity for RIF resistance compared with phenotypic DST were 90% (9/10 [60-98%]) and 95% (211/222 [91-97%]), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of INH resistance were 82% (22/27 [63-92%]) and 100% (205/205 [98-100%]), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The BD MAX MDR-TB assay had high sensitivity and specificity for detection of MTB and RIF and INH drug resistance and may be an important tool for rapid detection of TB and MDR-TB globally.

Comparative Utility of Genetic Determinants of Drug Resistance and Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility Profiling in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Setting: Programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Ningbo, China.

Objective: To assess whether data-driven genetic determinants of drug resistance patterns could outperform phenotypic drug susceptibility testing in predicting clinical meaningful outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB).

Design: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 104 MDR-TB patients. All MDR-TB isolates underwent drug susceptibility testing and genotyping for mutations that could cause drug resistance. Study outcomes were time to sputum smear conversion and probability of treatment success, as well as time to culture conversion within 6 months. Data were analyzed using latent class analysis, Kaplan–Meier curves, and Cox regression models.

Results: We report that latent class analysis of data identified two latent classes that predicted sputum smear conversion with P = 0.001 and area under receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.73. The predicted latent class memberships were associated with superior capability in predicting sputum culture conversion at 6 months and overall treatment success compared to phenotypic drug susceptibility profiling using boosted logistic regression models.

Conclusion: These results suggest that genetic determinants of drug resistance in combination with phenotypic drug-resistant tests could serve as useful biomarkers in predicting treatment prognosis in MDR-TB.

Increasing prevalence of resistance to second-line drugs among multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in Kuwait

Molecular methods detect genetic mutations associated with drug resistance. This study detected resistance-conferring mutations in gyrA/gyrB for fluoroquinolones and rrs/eis genes for second-line injectable drugs (SLIDs) among multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MDR-TB) isolates in Kuwait. Fifty pansusceptible M. tuberculosis and 102 MDR-TB strains were tested. Phenotypic susceptibility testing was performed by MGIT 960 system using SIRE drug kit. GenoType MTBDRsl version 1 (gMTBDRslv1) and GenoType MTBDRsl version 2 (gMTBDRslv2) tests were used for mutation detection. Results were validated by PCR-sequencing of respective genes. Fingerprinting was performed by spoligotyping. No mutations were detected in pansusceptible isolates. gMTBDRslv1 detected gyrA mutations in 12 and rrs mutations in 8 MDR-TB isolates. gMTBDRsl2 additionally detected gyrB mutations in 2 and eis mutation in 1 isolate. Mutations in both gyrA/gyrB and rrs/eis were not detected. gMTBDRslv1 also detected ethambutol resistance-conferring embB mutations in 59 isolates. Although XDR-TB was not detected, frequency of resistance-conferring mutations for fluoroquinolones or SLIDs was significantly higher among isolates collected during 2013–2019 versus 2006–2012. Application of both tests is warranted for proper management of MDR-TB patients in Kuwait as gMTBDRslv2 detected resistance to fluoroquinolones and/or SLIDs in 3 additional isolates while gMTBDRslv1 additionally detected resistance to ethambutol in 58% of MDR-TB isolates.

Value of routine whole genome sequencing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance detection

Routine whole genome sequencing (WGS) of pathogens is becoming more feasible as sequencing costs decrease and access to benchtop sequencing equipment and bioinformatics pipelines increases. This study examined the added value gained from implementing routine WGS of all Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in New South Wales, Australia. Drug resistance markers inferred from WGS data were compared to commercial genotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) assays and conventional phenotypic DST in all isolates sequenced between 2016 and 2019. Of the 1107 clinical M. tuberculosis isolates sequenced, 29 (2.6%) were multi-drug resistant (MDR); most belonged to Beijing (336; 30.4%) or East-African Indian (332; 30%) lineages. Compared with conventional phenotypic DST, WGS identified an additional 1% of isolates which were likely drug resistant, explained by mutations previously associated with treatment failure and mixed bacterial populations. However, WGS provided a 20% increase in drug resistance detection in comparison with commercial genotypic assays by identifying mutations outside of the classic resistance determining regions in rpoB, inhA, katG, pncA and embB genes. Gains in drug resistance detection were significant (p = 0.0137, paired t-test), but varied substantially for different phylogenetic lineages. In low incidence settings, routine WGS of M. tuberculosis provides better guidance for person-centered management of drug resistant tuberculosis than commercial genotypic assays.

Low-Level Rifampin Resistance and rpoB Mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: an Analysis of Whole-Genome Sequencing and Drug Susceptibility Test Data in New York

Rapid and reliable detection of rifampin (RIF) resistance is critical for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-resistant and multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis. Discordant RIF phenotype/genotype susceptibility results remain a challenge due to the presence of rpoB mutations that do not confer high levels of RIF resistance, as have been exhibited in strains with mutations such as Ser450Leu. These strains, termed low-level RIF resistant, exhibit elevated RIF MICs compared to fully susceptible strains but remain phenotypically susceptible by mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) testing and have been associated with poor patient outcomes. Here, we assess RIF resistance prediction by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) among a set of 1,779 prospectively tested strains by both prevalence of rpoB gene mutation and phenotype as part of routine clinical testing during a 2.5-year period. During this time, 139 strains were found to have nonsynonymous rpoB mutations, 53 of which were associated with RIF resistance, including both low-level and high-level resistance. Resistance to RIF (1.0 μg/ml in MGIT) was identified in 43 (81.1%) isolates. The remaining 10 (18.9%) strains were susceptible by MGIT but were confirmed to be low-level RIF resistant by MIC testing. Full rpoB gene sequencing overcame the limitations of critical concentration phenotyping, probe-based genotyping, and partial gene sequencing methods. Universal clinical WGS with concurrent phenotypic testing provided a more complete understanding of the prevalence and type of rpoB mutations and their association with RIF resistance in New York.

Tale of compounding oddities

We present a case of a 59-year-old man, who on being evaluated for abdominal pain and headache, was found to have a pancreatic head mass and inflammatory hypophysitis. Xpert MTB/Rif of the pancreatic mass biopsy showed the presence of tuberculosis (TB) with a very low load, and rifampicin resistance was detected with absence of probes A and B. Pyrosequencing (a novel genotypic test for TB) of the Xpert MTB/Rif isolate detected a single, rare, high-confidence mutation (S512T) in the rpoB region (rifampicin resistance determining region in the MTB genome). The TB mycobacteria growth indicator tube (TBMGIT) phenotypic drug susceptibility test (DST), however, showed rifampicin susceptibility. Incidentally, he was unable to tolerate rifampicin and responded well to a non-rifampicin-based regimen. We discuss a possible hypothesis of the Xpert-DST discordance in accordance with a recent literature review on phenotypic DST methods. We also discuss the utility of pyrosequencing in clinical practice for the diagnosis of TB and its resistance patterns.

Diagnostic Performance of GeneChip for the Rapid Detection of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Different Subgroups of Patients

Objective

Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is a growing problem worldwide. The rapid drug susceptibility test (DST) of DR-TB enables the timely administration of a chemotherapy regimen that effectively treats DR-TB. GeneChip has been reported as a novel molecular diagnostic tool for rapid diagnosis but has limited data on the performance of subgroup patients with DR-TB. This study aims to assess the diagnostic value of GeneChip in patients with different sexes, ages, treatment histories, treatment outcomes, and places of residence.

Methods

We recruited newly registered sputum smear-positive pulmonary TB patients from January 2011 to September 2020 in Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province, China. We applied both GeneChip and DST to measure drug resistance to rifampin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH). The kappa value, sensitivity, specificity, and agreement rate (AR) were calculated. We also applied a Classification and Regression Tree to explore factors related to the performance of GeneChip.

Results

We observed that sex, age, treatment history, treatment outcomes, and drug resistance type were significantly associated with the performance of GeneChip. For RIF resistance, there was significant accordance in young patients (kappa: 0.79) and cases with the treatment failure outcome (kappa: 0.92). For multidrug resistance (MDR), there was significant accordance in young cases (kappa: 0.77). Compared with previously treated patients, the newly treated patients had a significantly higher AR in detecting RIF resistance (0.97 vs 0.92), INH resistance (0.95 vs 0.89), and MDR (0.98 vs 0.92). The overall sensitivity, specificity, AR and kappa value for the diagnosis of MDR-TB were 0.70 (95% CI: 0.63–0.70), 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98–0.99), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97–0.98), and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.67–0.78), respectively.

Conclusion

We observed a high concordance between GeneChip and DST among TB patients with different characteristics, indicating that GeneChip can be a potential alternative tool for rapid MDR-TB detection.

Case Report: Therapeutic Threshold for Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis in a Patient from Maputo, Mozambique

We present a case of a patient in Mozambique, who initiated treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) without proof of resistance. For this patient, we estimated the probability of RR-TB using likelihood ratios of clinical arguments. The probability of RR-TB in Mozambique, positive HIV status, and treatment failure after a first treatment and after retreatment were included as confirming arguments, and a rapid molecular test showing rifampicin susceptibility as excluding argument. The therapeutic threshold to start treatment for RR-TB is unknown, but probably lower than 47% and should be calculated to guide clinical decisions.

Low Cycle Threshold Value in Xpert MTB/RIF Assay May Herald False Detection of Tuberculosis and Rifampicin Resistance: A Study of Two Cases

We report 2 cases for whom Xpert MTB/RIF falsely signaled rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, based on unusually low cycle threshold and 3 of 5 probes missing. Other mycobacterial tests were negative. Further optimization of the Xpert MTB/RIF algorithm is warranted.

Should treatment of low-level rifampicin mono-resistant tuberculosis be different?

Background

Rifampicin resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) was frequently detected in Suriname after the introduction of Xpert MTB/RIF in 2012. Subsequent phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing (DST) was not conclusive at that moment, while RR-TB patients treated with first-line tuberculostatics had good treatment outcome. In our study, we analysed this interesting observation.

Methods

We collected demographic and clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of TB patients from May 2012-December 2018 and performed a univariate and multivariate analysis to assess possible associations with resistance to rifampicin. Secondly, we conducted whole genome sequencing on all available Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates that had a rifampicin resistance in the Xpert MTB/RIF test and performed phenotypic DST on selected isolates.

Findings

RR-TB was detected in 59 (9.6%) patients confirmed by Xpert. These patients were treated with rifampicin-containing regimens in most (88%) of the cases. In all 32 samples examined, a D435Y mutation in the rpoB gene was identified; only one isolate revealed an additional isoniazid mutation. Phenotypic DST indicated low-level rifampicin resistance. In multivariate analysis, the Creole ethnicity was a factor associated with rifampicin resistance (aOR 3.5; 95%CI 1.9–6.4). The treatment success rate for patients with RR-TB (78.0%) was comparable to the treatment outcome in non-RR-TB patients 77.8%.

Interpretation

This study confirms a low-level rifampicin mono-resistance in TB patients of Suriname. These patients could benefit from a first-line regimen with high dose rifampicin (or rifabutin), rather than from the lengthy treatment regimens for rifampicin-resistant and multi-drug resistant TB, a concept of stratified medicine also advocated for the treatment of TB.

Funding

None.

Rifampin-resistance-associated mutations in the rifampin-resistance-determining region of the rpoB gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates in Shanghai, PR China

Introduction. Resistance to rifampin (RIF) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection is associated with mutations in the rpoB gene coding for the β-subunit of RNA polymerase. The contribution of various rpoB mutations to the development and level of RIF resistance remains elusive.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Various rpoB mutations may be associated with differential levels of RIF resistance.Aim. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between specific rpoB mutations and the MICs of RIF and rifabutin (RFB) against M. tuberculosis.Methodology. Of the 195 clinical isolates, 105 and 90 isolates were randomly selected from isolates resistant to RIF and sensitive to RIF, respectively. The MICs of 12 agents for M. tuberculosis isolates were determined using commercial Sensititre M. tuberculosis MIC plates and the broth microdilution method. Strains were screened for rpoB mutations by DNA extraction, rpoB gene amplification and DNA sequence analysis.Results. One hundred isolates (95.24 %) were found to have mutations in the RIF-resistance-determining region (RRDR) of the rpoB gene. Three rpoB mutations were identified in 90 RIF-susceptible isolates. Out of 105 isolates, 86 (81.90 %) were cross-resistant to both RIF and RFB. The most frequent mutation occurred at codons 450 and 445. We also found a novel nine-nucleotide (ATCATGCAT) deletion (between positions 1543 and 1551) in the rpoB gene in two strains (1.90 %) with resistance to RIF, but susceptibility to RFB. In addition, the mutation frequency at codon 450 was significantly higher in RIF-resistant/RFB-resistant (RIF^R/RFB^R) strains than in RIF^R/RFB^S strains (75.58 % versus 21.05 %, P<0.01), whereas the mutation frequency at codon 435 was significantly lower in RIF^R/RFB^R strains than in RIF^R/RFB^S strains (1.16 % versus 26.32 %, P<0.01).Conclusion. Our data support previous findings, which reported that various rpoB mutations are associated with differential levels of RIF resistance. The specific mutations in the rpoB gene in RIF^R/RFB^R isolates differed from those in the RIF^R/RFB^S isolates. A novel deletion mutation in the RRDR might be associated with resistance to RIF, but not to RFB. Further clinical studies are required to investigate the efficacy of RFB in the treatment of infections caused by M. tuberculosis strains harbouring these mutations.

Clinical Interpretation of Drug Susceptibility Tests in Tuberculosis

:

Prompt and accurate diagnosis of drug resistance is essential for optimal treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. However, only 20% of the more than half a million patients eligible for the treatment of MDR-TB/RR-TB receive an appropriate drug regimen. Drug-resistant TB regimens must include a sufficient number of effective medications, a significant challenge for clinicians worldwide, as most are forced to make therapeutic decisions without any, or very little information on drug susceptibility testing. Although phenotypic DST is still commonly regarded as the gold standard for determining M. tuberculosis susceptibility to antituberculosis drugs, it has several limitations, mainly its prolonged turnaround time. Molecular methods based on M. tuberculosis genomic DNA sequencing have been developed during the past two decades, to identify the most common mutations involved in drug resistance. The Xpert ® MTB/RIF is a real-time polymerase chain reaction that offers results in less than two hours and has an overall sensitivity for rifampin resistance of 96% and 98% specificity. Line probe assays (LPAs) are commercial DNA strip-based tests for detecting the most frequent mutations responsible for resistance to rifampin, isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, and second-line injectable drugs.

:

Discrepancies between phenotypic and genotyping methods are a problem that the clinician will face in everyday practice. However, any resistance result (with any type of test) in a person with risk factors for harboring resistant microorganisms should be considered appropriate while the results of complementary tests are available.