Prevalence and detection of mixed-population enterococcal bacteremia

Consideration of within-patient diversity highlights transmission pathways and antimicrobial resistance gene variability in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium

BACKGROUND

WGS is increasingly being applied to healthcare-associated vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) outbreaks. Within-patient diversity could complicate transmission resolution if single colonies are sequenced from identified cases.

OBJECTIVES

Determine the impact of within-patient diversity on transmission resolution of VREfm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen colonies were collected from VREfm positive rectal screens, single colonies were collected from clinical samples and Illumina WGS was performed. Two isolates were selected for Oxford Nanopore sequencing and hybrid genome assembly to generate lineage-specific reference genomes. Mapping to closely related references was used to identify genetic variations and closely related genomes. A transmission network was inferred for the entire genome set using Phyloscanner.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In total, 229 isolates from 11 patients were sequenced. Carriage of two or three sequence types was detected in 27% of patients. Presence of antimicrobial resistance genes and plasmids was variable within genomes from the same patient and sequence type. We identified two dominant sequence types (ST80 and ST1424), with two putative transmission clusters of two patients within ST80, and a single cluster of six patients within ST1424. We found transmission resolution was impaired using fewer than 14 colonies.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients can carry multiple sequence types of VREfm, and even within related lineages the presence of mobile genetic elements and antimicrobial resistance genes can vary. VREfm within-patient diversity could be considered in future to aid accurate resolution of transmission networks.

Variability of antibiograms: how often do changes in the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern occur in isolates from one patient?

OBJECTIVES

Many laboratories do not perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for all consecutive isolates of the same species from one patient. The objective of this study was to assess how often changes in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns (cASP) occur in such isolates.

METHODS

AST was performed for all isolates of defined species obtained from clinical routine (2015-2018) without restrictions for consecutive or sequential isolates of one patient. Occurrence of cASP and time between the first sampling date and first cASP were determined by combining antibiograms from all specimens and after stratification into species and specimens.

RESULTS

A total of 35 473 AST results were included (range 2-71 per case). Combining pathogens and specimens, 1991 cASP occurred in 1269/8502 (14.9%) of all cases after a median time until cASP of 5 days (range 0-364). Of these, 628/1991 (31.5%) occurred on the day of first sampling (predominantly due to phenotypic variants in the same specimen). Excluding isolates with differing AST pattern on the first day of sampling, the median time until cASP was 12 days (range 1-364). Stratification into species and specimen revealed a large variance of the median time until cASP (e.g. in Escherichia coli: 5 days; range 1-48 for blood cultures or 16 days; 1-364 for urine).

DISCUSSION

Using routine microbiological data in a large tertiary hospital, cASP occurs occasionally. The time to perform subsequent AST to detect cASP depends on the species and type of specimen. Other studies are needed to evaluate whether ideal time intervals applicable beyond local settings can be defined.

Genome-Based Analysis of Enterococcus faecium Bacteremia Associated with Recurrent and Mixed-Strain Infection

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) bloodstream infections are associated with high recurrence rates. This study used genome sequencing to accurately distinguish the frequency of relapse and reinfection in patients with recurrent E. faecium bacteremia and to investigate strain relatedness in patients with apparent VREfm and vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium (VSEfm) mixed infection. A retrospective study was performed at the Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) between November 2006 and December 2012. We analyzed the genomes of 44 E. faecium isolates from 21 patients (26 VREfm isolates from 12 patients with recurrent bacteremia and 18 isolates from 9 patients with putative VREfm/VSEfm mixed infection). Phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility was determined using a Vitek2 instrument. Genomes were compared with those of a further 263 E. faecium isolates associated with bacteremia in patients at CUH over the same time period. Pairwise comparison of core genomes indicated that 10 (71%) episodes of recurrent VREfm bacteremia were due to reinfection with a new strain, with reinfection being more likely with increasing time between the two positive cultures. The majority (78%) of patients with a mixed VREfm and VSEfm infection had unrelated strains. More than half (59%) of study isolates were closely related to another isolate associated with bacteremia from CUH. This included 60% of isolates associated with reinfection, indicating acquisition in the hospital. This study provides the first high-resolution insights into recurrence and mixed infection by E. faecium and demonstrates that reinfection with a new strain, often acquired from the hospital, is a driver of recurrence.

Emergence of linezolid resistance in hepatobiliary infections caused by Enterococcus faecium

Enterococcal infections are common in liver transplantation and hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgery. Linezolid is frequently used to treat not only vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), but also vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus (VSE) infections, and resistance can develop. This study evaluated all the Liver Unit patients who developed infections with linezolid-resistant Enterococcus (LRE) in order to elicit the association with prior linezolid usage, to explore possible risk factors for infection, and to better understand the epidemiology of these isolates in this patient group. Between 2010 and 2015, infections with LRE developed in 10 patients (8 following liver transplantation and 2 following HPB surgery) after 22-108 days of treatment. Selected pulsed-field gel electrophoresis demonstrated that 2 out of 10 patients were cocolonized with different strains and indicated that cross-transmission may have occurred. In conclusion, in this group of patients with complex hepatobiliary infections, the optimal antibiotic strategies for the treatment of Enterococcus faecium infections are not clearly defined, and there is a significant risk of emergence of resistance to linezolid in E. faecium after exposure to this agent in patients, especially in the presence of a deep source of infection on a background of hepatic artery insufficiency. Caution is needed when using prolonged courses of linezolid in this setting, and further studies are necessary to determine the optimum treatment.