Genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase inhibitors by use of the TruGene sequencing system

Towards Next-Generation Sequencing for HIV-1 Drug Resistance Testing in a Clinical Setting

The HIV genotypic resistance test (GRT) is a standard of care for the clinical management of HIV/AIDS patients. In recent decades, population or Sanger sequencing has been the foundation for drug resistance monitoring in clinical settings. However, the advent of high-throughput or next-generation sequencing has caused a paradigm shift towards the detection and characterization of low-abundance covert mutations that would otherwise be missed by population sequencing. This is clinically significant, as these mutations can potentially compromise the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy, causing poor virologic suppression. Therefore, it is important to develop a more sensitive method so as to reliably detect clinically actionable drug-resistant mutations (DRMs). Here, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of a laboratory-developed, high-throughput, sequencing-based GRT using 103 archived clinical samples that were previously tested for drug resistance using population sequencing. As expected, high-throughput sequencing found all the DRMs that were detectable by population sequencing. Significantly, 78 additional DRMs were identified only by high-throughput sequencing, which is statistically significant based on McNemar's test. Overall, our results complement previous studies, supporting the notion that the two methods are well correlated, and the high-throughput sequencing method appears to be an excellent alternative for drug resistance testing in a clinical setting.

New aspects of the Virus Life Cycle and Clinical Utility of Next Generation Sequencing based HIV-1 Resistance Testing in the Genomic, the Proviral and the Viral Reservoir of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells

BACKGROUND

Typically, genotypic resistance testing is recommended at the start of antiretroviral therapy and is even mandatory in cases of virologic failure. The material of choice is plasma viral RNA. However, in patients with low viremia (viral load < 500 copies/ml), resistance testing by population-based sequencing is very difficult.

OBJECTIVE

Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether next generation sequencing (NGS) from proviral DNA and RNA could be an alternative.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

EDTA blood samples (n = 36) from routine clinical viral load testing were used for the study. Viral loads ranged from 96 to 390,000 copies/mL, with 100% of samples having low viremia. Distribution of subtypes A (n = 2), B (n = 16), C (n = 4), D (n = 2), G (1), CRF02 AG (n = 5), CRF01 AE (n = 5), undefined/mixed (n = 4). The extracted consensus sequences were uploaded to the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Data Base and Geno2pheno for online analysis of drug resistance mutations and resistance factors.

RESULTS

A total of 2476 variants or drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were detected with Sanger sequencing, compared with 2892 variants with NGS. An average of 822/1008 variants were identified in plasma viral RNA by Sanger or NGS sequencing, 834/956 in cellular viral RNA, and 820/928 in cellular viral DNA.

CONCLUSIONS

Both methods are well suited for the detection of HIV substitutions or drug resistance mutations. Our results suggest that cellular RNA or cellular viral DNA is an informative alternative to plasma viral RNA for variant detection in patients with low viremia, as shown by the high correlation of variants in the different viral pools. And we show that by using UDS, a plus of two DRMs per patient becomes visible and that can make a big difference in the assessment of the expected resistance behavior of the virus.

Trends in drug resistance-associated mutations in a real-life cohort of Italian patients infected with HIV-1

Recent studies support the idea that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drug resistance is declining in developed countries. To help assess the current situation in Italy, the dynamics of drug resistance mutations in pol and integrase genes in plasma samples from HIV-1-positive patients attending Sapienza University Hospital, Rome, from 2003 to 2014 were analysed. In total, 1730 genotype resistance tests (GRTs) were retrospectively analysed. The prevalence of major drug resistance mutations (DRMs) was evaluated over time in the global population and in patients with antiretroviral therapy (ART) failure. Population dynamics, changes in ART administration, and HIV-1 RNA levels were analysed in combination with DRM trends. The global population showed a strong reduction in major DRMs to all drug classes. Over the 2003-2014 decade, resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs) declined from 80.0% to 18.7%, from 42.8% to 20.1% and from 74.2% to 8.3%, respectively (P<0.005 for all comparisons). However, only PI-associated mutations showed a significant decrease in patients experiencing ART failure. Interestingly, analysis of the integrase gene disclosed an increased resistance to integrase inhibitors, mainly regarding N155H, detected in 32.6% of raltegravir-treated patients in 2012-2014. In conclusion, in line with previous findings, this study shows that drug resistance is declining in Italy. However, the persistence of DRMs to NRTIs and NNRTIs suggests that despite adherence and treatment optimisation, some patients still experience therapy failure, emphasising the need for GRTs both in naïve and ART-failed patients.

Sensitive deep-sequencing-based HIV-1 genotyping assay to simultaneously determine susceptibility to protease, reverse transcriptase, integrase, and maturation inhibitors, as well as HIV-1 coreceptor tropism

With 29 individual antiretroviral drugs available from six classes that are approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection, a combination of different phenotypic and genotypic tests is currently needed to monitor HIV-infected individuals. In this study, we developed a novel HIV-1 genotypic assay based on deep sequencing (DeepGen HIV) to simultaneously assess HIV-1 susceptibilities to all drugs targeting the three viral enzymes and to predict HIV-1 coreceptor tropism. Patient-derived gag-p2/NCp7/p1/p6/pol-PR/RT/IN- and env-C2V3 PCR products were sequenced using the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine. Reads spanning the 3' end of the Gag, protease (PR), reverse transcriptase (RT), integrase (IN), and V3 regions were extracted, truncated, translated, and assembled for genotype and HIV-1 coreceptor tropism determination. DeepGen HIV consistently detected both minority drug-resistant viruses and non-R5 HIV-1 variants from clinical specimens with viral loads of ≥1,000 copies/ml and from B and non-B subtypes. Additional mutations associated with resistance to PR, RT, and IN inhibitors, previously undetected by standard (Sanger) population sequencing, were reliably identified at frequencies as low as 1%. DeepGen HIV results correlated with phenotypic (original Trofile, 92%; enhanced-sensitivity Trofile assay [ESTA], 80%; TROCAI, 81%; and VeriTrop, 80%) and genotypic (population sequencing/Geno2Pheno with a 10% false-positive rate [FPR], 84%) HIV-1 tropism test results. DeepGen HIV (83%) and Trofile (85%) showed similar concordances with the clinical response following an 8-day course of maraviroc monotherapy (MCT). In summary, this novel all-inclusive HIV-1 genotypic and coreceptor tropism assay, based on deep sequencing of the PR, RT, IN, and V3 regions, permits simultaneous multiplex detection of low-level drug-resistant and/or non-R5 viruses in up to 96 clinical samples. This comprehensive test, the first of its class, will be instrumental in the development of new antiretroviral drugs and, more importantly, will aid in the treatment and management of HIV-infected individuals.

Current assays for HIV-1 diagnostics and antiretroviral therapy monitoring: challenges and possibilities

In 2011, there were over 34 million people living with HIV infections, placing a heavy burden on public health sectors. HIV infection is a lifelong threat that cannot be prevented by vaccination or cured by antiretroviral drugs. The infected patients rely on daily antiretroviral therapy to suppress HIV viral replication. Hence, it is important to diagnose HIV infections as early as possible and to monitor the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy every 3–6 months. Different immunoassays detecting HIV antigens and antibodies have been modified to offer better sensitivity and more rapid diagnosis. Several clinical and virological parameters, including CD4+ cell counts, viral load and drug resistance mutations, are also used for treatment monitoring. Many molecular assay optimizations are now being utilized to improve patient care. This review will focus on the most updated HIV diagnostic assays, as well as discussing the upcoming possibilities of other advanced technologies.

Short communication: analysis of the integrase gene from HIV type 1-positive patients living in a rural area of West Cameroon

Major mutations associated with HIV-I integrase inhibitors (INI) resistance are rare in INI-naive patients. However, polymorphisms at positions that may influence the genetic barrier and/or drive the selection of specific INI resistance pathways are common in HIV non-B subtypes. The aim was to evaluate the presence of natural polymorphisms and/or INI resistance mutations in HIV-1 non-B subtype samples obtained from INI-naive patients living in rural west Cameroon. Thirty-three HIV-1 non-B samples were obtained from INI-naive African women and, as controls, 15 samples of HIV-1 subtype B were obtained from antiretroviral-naive Italian patients. The integrase gene was amplified and sequenced using Trugene Core Reagents. Several amino acid positions in B and non-B subtypes were found to be polymorphic. Interestingly, two patients infected with the CRF02_AG subtype had the resistance mutations N155H and E157Q/E and 12% of African samples had an amino acid substitution at position 143. Silent mutations leading to a higher increment of genetic barriers were detected at 140 and 151 positions in non B-subtypes. Although most polymorphisms may have little effect on INI susceptibility, the IN gene variations found in the present study should be taken into consideration as they may facilitate or delay the emergence of variants fully resistant to INIs.

Role of raltegravir in HIV-1 management

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature concerning the role of raltegravir in the treatment of HIV-1 in antiretroviral (ARV)-experienced and ARV-naïve patients.

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search was conducted for published data through March 2012 using the search terms raltegravir, MK-0518, and integrase strand transfer inhibitor. An additional search of International Pharmaceutical Abstracts for unpublished data, including data from the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, the International AIDS Society, and the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, was conducted using similar search terms.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

In vitro and in vivo Phase 2, Phase 3, and postmarketing studies available in English, evaluating antiretroviral regimens that contain raltegravir for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in both ARV-naïve and ARV-experienced patients, were evaluated. Studies assessing raltegravir pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were included for review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The nucleoside-based regimen of raltegravir with tenofovir/emtricitabine provides an effective first-line treatment option. However, nucleoside-sparing regimens appear unfavorable in ARV-naïve subjects and should be reserved for patients with limited treatment options. Raltegravir used with optimized background therapy provides an alternative regimen for ARV-experienced patients. This review describes the available in vitro and in vivo data on raltegravir potency, defined as the ability to achieve undetectable viral load, and safety profile, as well as comparison to standard HIV-1 therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Raltegravir has demonstrated potent antiretroviral activity against HIV-1 in both ARV-naïve and ARV-experienced subjects, with the benefits of a favorable adverse effect profile and minimal drug interactions. Raltegravir must be dosed twice daily, as once daily raltegravir displays decreased virologic efficacy compared to twice daily dosing. However, the ongoing development of new integrase strand transfer inhibitors may provide potent once daily regimens.

Description of two commercially available assays for genotyping of HIV-1

HIV-1 resistance testing is one important part in the diagnostics of antiretroviral treatment and is commonly done by genotyping. Currently, two systems are commercially available and, despite being far from easy to use, these have achieved a high degree of sophistication. Modifications of standard kit protocols might be necessary based on the clinical situation. Although resistance reports based on decision rules are a part of both systems, considerable knowledge and skills are nevertheless required by the user to establish useful clinical data out of detected resistance patterns. Both systems described here have their advantages and disadvantages; a decision for one or the other system needs to be based on individual requirements. The future might lie in so-called 'next-generation sequencing' systems based on pyrosequencing, which enable a high throughput and the detection of minor variants of less than 1%.

Genotypic prediction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tropism by use of plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the routine clinical laboratory

We developed a sequencing assay for genotypic HIV-1 tropism determination. The assay allows examination of HIV RNA from plasma and HIV DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), including PBMC samples from patients with undetectable viral loads. Assessment of 100 pairs of plasma and PBMC samples showed a high concordance of 90%. With the limitations of population-based sequencing, the assay was found to be robust and suitable for the routine clinical laboratory.

Evaluation of two human immunodeficiency virus-1 genotyping systems: ViroSeq 2.0 and an in-house method

Commercial HIV-1 genotypic resistance assays are very expensive, particularly for use in resource-constrained settings like India. Hence a cost effective in-house assay for drug resistance was validated against the standard ViroSeq HIV-1 Genotyping System 2.0 (Celera Diagnostics, CA, USA). A total of 50 samples were used for this evaluation (21 proficiency panels and 29 clinical isolates). Known resistance positions within HIV-1 protease (PR) region (1-99 codons) and HIV-1 reverse-transcriptase (RT) region (1-240 codons) were included. The results were analysed for each codon as follows: (i) concordant; (ii) partially concordant; (iii) indeterminate and (iv) discordant. A total of 2750 codons (55 codons per patient samplex50 samples) associated with drug resistance (1050 PR and 1700 RT) were analysed. For PR, 99% of the codon results were concordant and 1% were partially concordant. For RT, 99% of the codon results were concordant, 0.9% were partially concordant and 0.1% were discordant. No indeterminate results were observed and the results were reproducible. Overall, the in-house assay provided comparable results to those of US FDA approved ViroSeq, which costs about a half of the commercial assay ($ 100 vs. $ 230), making it suitable for resource-limited settings.