Evaluation of MicroScan WalkAway for Determination of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility in Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli

Comparison of two commercial broth microdilution panels for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: Thermo Scientific™ Sensititre DKMGN vs. Beckman Coulter MicroScan NMDRM1

Introduction

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) using broth microdilution (BMD) is usually the reference method to obtain accurate minimum inhibitory concentrations and optimally manage infections with resistant organisms. Several commercial dry BMD are available for AST in clinical laboratories.

Materials and methods

Two commercial BMD panels for testing of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria were compared: the Thermo Scientific™ Sensititre DKMGN and the Beckman Coulter NMDRM1, for 17 antimicrobial agents.

Results

A total of 207 isolates were tested: three ATCC strains and one NCTC strain, six quality control strains from the Belgian National Antimicrobial Committee, and 197 clinical isolates, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) 2023 breakpoints version 13.1 were used to assign susceptibility categories.

Discussion

Overall, the categorical agreement (CA) and essential agreement (EA) were both above 90%, but several useful antibiotics for the treatment of multi-resistant organisms showed CA and EA under 90%, that is, meropenem, imipenem, and colistin for Enterobacterales and meropenem and colistin for P. aeruginosa. For Enterobacterales, the NMDRM1 panel showed a significantly higher resistance rate for meropenem, imipenem, amikacin, and colistin. For carbapenems, the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were underestimated by the DKMGN panel, as already pointed out by a warning on the EUCAST website. To better assess carbapenem susceptibility in carbapenem-resistant organisms, the DKMGN panel now requires the use of a higher inoculum in the insert kit. However, for a given isolate whose susceptibility to carbapenems is not known, there is a risk of underestimating the MIC values. Our results show that colistin testing remains a challenge, highlighting the urgent need for the development of more accurate commercial methods. The use of a single commercial method cannot guarantee good precision in the determination of the MIC value for colistin.

Evaluation of three commercial methods of susceptibility testing for ceftolozane/tazobactam against carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

INTRODUCTION

Ceftolozane/tazobactam has shown excellent activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but this drug is not always included in commercial panels. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of 2 gradient strips (BioMérieux and Liofilchem) and a commercial microdilution panel (Sensititre, EURGNCOL panel) using this combination against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates.

METHODS

Three commercial methods were tested with 41 metallo-beta-lactamase-producing and 59 non-carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa isolates. Broth microdilution was used as reference.

RESULTS

All carbapenemase-producing isolates and only one non-producing isolate were resistant to this antibiotic. Both essential agreement and bias were outside the acceptance intervals since MIC values were higher than reference values for all three methods. The Kappa index indicated poor or weak agreement. Changes in clinical categories were observed in 3 isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

The three methods yielded poor agreement with the reference. Despite the differences in MIC values, fewer than 3% involved category changes.

German Multicenter Study Analyzing Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam of Clinical Meropenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Using a Commercially Available Broth Microdilution Assay

Multidrug resistance is an emerging healthcare issue, especially concerning Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this multicenter study, P. aeruginosa isolates with resistance against meropenem detected by routine methods were collected and tested for carbapenemase production and susceptibility against ceftazidime-avibactam. Meropenem-resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa from various clinical materials were collected at 11 tertiary care hospitals in Germany from 2017−2019. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined via microdilution plates (MICRONAUT-S) of ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem at each center. Detection of the presence of carbapenemases was performed by PCR or immunochromatography. For meropenem-resistant isolates (n = 448), the MIC range of ceftazidime-avibactam was 0.25−128 mg/L, MIC90 was 128 mg/L and MIC50 was 16 mg/L. According to EUCAST clinical breakpoints, 213 of all meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates were categorized as susceptible (47.5%) to ceftazidime-avibactam. Metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) could be detected in 122 isolates (27.3%). The MIC range of ceftazidime-avibactam in MBL-positive isolates was 4−128 mg/L, MIC90 was >128 mg/L and MIC50 was 32 mg/L. There was strong variation in the prevalence of MBL-positive isolates among centers. Our in vitro results support ceftazidime-avibactam as a treatment option against infections caused by meropenem-resistant, MBL-negative P. aeruginosa.

Pathogenesis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm: A Review

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with several human infections, mainly related to healthcare services. In the hospital, it is associated with resistance to several antibiotics, which poses a great challenge to therapy. However, one of the biggest challenges in treating P. aeruginosa infections is that related to biofilms. The complex structure of the P. aeruginosa biofilm contributes an additional factor to the pathogenicity of this microorganism, leading to therapeutic failure, in addition to escape from the immune system, and generating chronic infections that are difficult to eradicate. In this review, we address several molecular aspects of the pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa biofilms.