Multicenter Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the Vitek 2 System

Antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against KPC-2-producing Enterobacterales: a cross-combination and dose-escalation titration study with relebactam and vaborbactam

With the introduction of ceftazidime-avibactam worldwide, the antimicrobial activity of new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs) needs to be investigated. From January 2020 to June 2023, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacterales were collected. With a broth microdilution test of new BL/BLIs, cross-activity test with nine combinations of BLs and new BLIs and dose-escalation titration test for non-susceptible isolates were conducted to investigate inhibitory activities of new BLIs. A total of 188 isolates was collected and most isolates (186/188, 98.9%) carried the KPC-2 gene exclusively, while two isolates (1.1%) co-harbored NDM-1. Among the 186 KPC-2-producing isolates, 184 (98.9%) were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, 173 (93.0%) to imipenem-relebactam, and 184 (98.9%) to meropenem-vaborbactam. All isolates non-susceptible to imipenem-relebactam or meropenem-vaborbactam became susceptible when avibactam replaced relebactam or vaborbactam, with 7 of 11 (63.6%) imipenem-relebactam non-susceptible isolates and both (100.0%) of the meropenem-vaborbactam non-susceptible isolates. When the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of BLs were compared using log2 scales, combinations with avibactam showed statistically significant efficacy in lowering MICs compared to relebactam and vaborbactam (all P < 0.05). In the dose-escalation test of new BLIs, increasing dose of all new BLIs corresponded to increased susceptibility to BLs. Ceftazidime-avibactam exhibited excellent susceptibility against KPC-2-producing Enterobacterales unless co-harboring metallo-β-lactamase. The cross-combination test against non-susceptible isolates suggests that the inhibitory activity of avibactam was superior to those of relebactam or vaborbactam. Increasing the dose of new BLIs produced increased susceptibility to BLs, suggesting that high-concentration regimen need to be developed.

IMPORTANCE

This study investigated 188 Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-2-producing Enterobacterales collected from January 2020 to June 2023 in a tertiary care hospital of Korea. Most isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam (98.9%) and meropenem-vaborbactam (98.9%), while susceptibility to imipenem-relebactam was lower (93.0%). The cross-combination test using nine combinations of the individual β-lactams (BLs) and new β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) showed that the inhibitory activity of avibactam was significantly superior to relebactam or vaborbactam when the Log2 MIC of BLs were compared for each combination with BLIs (all P < 0.05). The dose-escalation test of new BLIs demonstrated that increasing doses of new BLIs corresponded to increased susceptibility to BLs. Taken together, this study illustrates the excellent activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against KPC-2-producing Enterobacterales and suggests further investigation into high-concentration regimens for potentially non-susceptible clinical isolates.

DP1, a multifaceted synthetic peptide: Mechanism of action, activity and clinical potential

AIMS

Microbial infections remain a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) being a prominent etiological agent, responsible for causing persistent bacterial infections in humans. It is a nosocomial, opportunistic pathogen, capable to propagate within the bloodstream and withstand therapeutic interventions. In the current study, a novel, indigenously designed synthetic antimicrobial peptide (sAMP) has been evaluated for its antimicrobial potential to inhibit the growth and proliferation of S. aureus.

MAIN METHODS

The sAMP, designed peptide (DP1) was evaluated for its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) against a panel of pathogenic bacterial strains. Membrane mechanistic studies were performed by measuring membrane conductivity via dielectric spectroscopy and visualizing changes in bacterial membrane structure through field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Further, DP1 was tested for its in vivo antimicrobial potential in an S. aureus-induced systemic infection model.

KEY FINDINGS

The results indicated that DP1 has the potential to inhibit the growth and proliferation of a broad spectrum of Gram-positive, Gram-negative and multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial strains. Strong bactericidal effect attributed to change in electrical conductivity of the bacterial cells leading to membrane disruption was observed through dielectric spectroscopy and FE-SEM micrographs. Further, in the in vivo murine systemic infection study, 50 % reduction in S. aureus bioburden was observed within 1 day of the administration of DP1.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results indicate that DP1 is a multifaceted peptide with potent bactericidal, antioxidant and therapeutic properties. It holds significance as a novel drug candidate to effectively combat S. aureus-mediated systemic infections.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Meropenem/Vaborbactam for the Management of Enterobacterales Infections: A Narrative Review, Clinical Considerations, and Expert Opinion

This comprehensive review examines the unique attributes, distinctions, and clinical implications of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and meropenem-vaborbactam (MEM-VAB) against difficult-to-treat Enterobacterales infections. Our manuscript explores these antibiotics' pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, antimicrobial activities, in vitro susceptibility testing, and clinical data. Moreover, it includes a meticulous examination of comparative clinical and microbiological studies, assessed and presented to provide clarity in making informed treatment choices for clinicians. Finally, we propose an expert opinion from a microbiological and a clinical point of view about their use in appropriate clinical settings. This is the first review aiming to provide healthcare professionals with valuable insights for making informed treatment decisions when combating carbapenem-resistant pathogens.

Performance of Ceftazidime-Avibactam 30/20-μg and 10/4-μg Disks for Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Ceftazidime-avibactam, a new β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination, is active against multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates and has became available for clinical use in China in the latter half of 2019. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the disk diffusion test with ceftazidime-avibactam 10/4-μg and 30/20-μg disks, compared with the reference broth microdilution method, with a collection of 467 Enterobacterales and 182 P. aeruginosa nonduplicate clinical isolates. The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing indicated that the categorical agreement (CA) of ceftazidime-avibactam 10/4-μg disk testing for all tested Enterobacterales isolates was 99.8%, with 0.5% very major errors (VMEs) and no major error (ME). The CA of ceftazidime-avibactam 10/4-μg disk testing for all tested P. aeruginosa isolates was 87.9%, with 15.5% MEs and no VME. The CA of ceftazidime-avibactam 30/20-μg disk testing for all tested Enterobacterales isolates was 99.4%, with 1.5% VMEs and no ME. The CA of ceftazidime-avibactam 30/20-μg disk testing for all tested P. aeruginosa isolates was 91.8%, with 2.5% VMEs and 9.9% MEs. Overall, ceftazidime-avibactam 10/4-μg disk testing showed superior performance and was more suitable for assessment of the susceptibility of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates. IMPORTANCE Multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa strains have become a global public threat, with the emergence and prevalence of plasmid-mediated extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC cephalosporinases, and carbapenemases disseminated worldwide. Ceftazidime-avibactam, which is commercially available, has shown excellent in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates. Moreover, ceftazidime-avibactam has shown promise in treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant isolates. The disk diffusion test for ceftazidime-avibactam is the most common antimicrobial susceptibility testing method in most laboratories in China. The accurate detection of ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility is of great significance for the rational clinical application of drugs. Here, we evaluated the performance of the ceftazidime-avibactam 10/4-μg and 30/20-μg disk diffusion tests, compared with the reference broth microdilution method, with clinical Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates.

Comparative Experimental Investigation of Biodegradable Antimicrobial Polymer-Based Composite Produced by 3D Printing Technology Enriched with Metallic Particles

Due to the prevailing existence of the COVID-19 pandemic, novel and practical strategies to combat pathogens are on the rise worldwide. It is estimated that, globally, around 10% of hospital patients will acquire at least one healthcare-associated infection. One of the novel strategies that has been developed is incorporating metallic particles into polymeric materials that neutralize infectious agents. Considering the broad-spectrum antimicrobial potency of some materials, the incorporation of metallic particles into the intended hybrid composite material could inherently add significant value to the final product. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate an antimicrobial polymeric PLA-based composite material enhanced with different microparticles (copper, aluminum, stainless steel, and bronze) for the antimicrobial properties of the hybrid composite. The prepared composite material samples produced with fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printing technology were tested for different time intervals to establish their antimicrobial activities. The results presented here depict that the sample prepared with 90% copper and 10% PLA showed the best antibacterial activity (99.5%) after just 20 min against different types of bacteria as compared to the other samples. The metallic-enriched PLA-based antibacterial sheets were remarkably effective against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli; therefore, they can be a good candidate for future biomedical, food packaging, tissue engineering, prosthetic material, textile industry, and other science and technology applications. Thus, antimicrobial sheets made from PLA mixed with metallic particles offer sustainable solutions for a wide range of applications where touching surfaces is a big concern.

Susceptibility of Meropenem-Resistant and/or Carbapenemase-Producing Clinical Isolates of Enterobacterales (Enterobacteriaceae) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam as Assessed by In Vitro Testing Methods

This study aimed to assess the comparability of in vitro susceptibility testing methods to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T). Meropenem-resistant and/or carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates of Enterobacterales (Enterobacteriaceae) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were tested by both bioMérieux ETEST and VITEK-2 AST-N397 card and compared with a Micronaut AST-system broth microdilution (BMD) method. CZA and C/T MICs were interpreted using EUCAST breakpoints. Of the 153 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 55.6% and 0.0% (VITEK 2) and 56.9% and 0.0% (ETEST and BMD) were susceptible to CZA and C/T, respectively. Of 52 P. aeruginosa isolates, 50.0% and 40.4% (VITEK 2, ETEST, and BMD) were susceptible to CZA and C/T, respectively. The essential agreement (EA) was 96.1% (197/205; VITEK 2 versus BMD) and 95.6% (196/205; ETEST versus BMD) for CZA testing, whereas EA was 98.0% (201/205; VITEK 2 versus BMD) and 96.6% (198/205; ETEST versus BMD) for C/T testing. The categorical agreement (CA) was 98.0% (201/205; VITEK 2 versus BMD) and 100% (ETEST versus BMD) for CZA testing, whereas CA was 100% (VITEK 2 versus BMD) and 100% (ETEST versus BMD) for C/T testing. Categorical errors regarded four Enterobacteriaceae isolates. VITEK 2 and ETEST yielded equivalent CZA and C/T susceptibility testing results, compared to the BMD method, in such a clinical context.

Comparative Evaluation of Vitek 2 and Etest versus Broth Microdilution for Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) are novel antibiotics with activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Nevertheless, resistance to both agents has been reported emphasizing the need for accurate and widely accessible susceptibility testing. In the present study, Vitek 2 and Etest CAZ and C/T MIC results for 100 non-repetitive clinical isolates (83 Enterobacterales and 17 P. aeruginosa, whereof 69 challenge isolates) were compared to the standard broth microdilution (BMD) method. EUCAST breakpoints were used for assessing the categorical (CA) and essential (EA) agreement between the methods along with the corresponding error rates. The Vitek 2 performance was comparable to that of BMD for testing both antimicrobial agents exceeding the ISO requirements (CA 98–99%, EA 96–100%, major errors (MEs) 0–1%, very major error (VMEs) 1%). Likewise, the Etest provided accurate results for CZA and C/T testing against Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa, respectively (CA 100%, EA 97–100%, MEs 0%, VMEs 0%). On the contrary, EA of 85% and 6% VME rate were found for CZA Etest and P. aeruginosa. Overall, Vitek 2 measurements of CZA and C/T susceptibility correlated closely with the reference BMD, indicating that it can represent a suitable alternative to BMD for susceptibility testing of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. The Etest did not fulfill the ISO performance criteria of EA and VME for CZA and P. aeruginosa. Further studies are needed to assess whether the Etest allows a reliable assessment of CZA and C/T EUCAST MICs.

Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Meropenem/Vaborbactam and Imipenem/Relebactam in Gram-Negative MDR Bacilli: Molecular Mechanisms and Susceptibility Testing

Multidrug resistance (MDR) represents a serious global threat due to the rapid global spread and limited antimicrobial options for treatment of difficult-to-treat (DTR) infections sustained by MDR pathogens. Recently, novel β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (βL-βLICs) have been developed for the treatment of DTR infections due to MDR Gram-negative pathogens. Although novel βL-βLICs exhibited promising in vitro and in vivo activities against MDR pathogens, emerging resistances to these novel molecules have recently been reported. Resistance to novel βL-βLICs is due to several mechanisms including porin deficiencies, increasing carbapenemase expression and/or enzyme mutations. In this review, we summarized the main mechanisms related to the resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam in MDR Gram-negative micro-organisms. We focused on antimicrobial activities and resistance traits with particular regard to molecular mechanisms related to resistance to novel βL-βLICs. Lastly, we described and discussed the main detection methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of such molecules. With increasing reports of resistance to novel βL-βLICs, continuous attention should be maintained on the monitoring of the phenotypic traits of MDR pathogens, into the characterization of related mechanisms, and on the emergence of cross-resistance to these novel antimicrobials.

The Ins and Outs of Susceptibility Testing for New β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations for Gram-Negative Organisms

Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam are among the newest β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs) introduced to the North American antibiotic market. All have broad Gram-negative activity, including against certain carbapenemases. Despite this, susceptibility testing is warranted due to variable activity against certain β-lactamases (e.g., oxacillinases) and the presence of acquired resistance mechanisms in some isolates. Here, we discuss what we know about these new antimicrobial agents and how to navigate implementation of susceptibility testing and reporting of these agents in clinical laboratories.

Evaluation of MicroScan WalkAway for Determination of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility in Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli

We evaluated the performance of ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam MicroScan Neg multidrug-resistant MIC 1 (NMR1) panel for clinical carbapenem-nonsusceptible Gram-negative bacilli isolates. We evaluated 212 clinically significant carbapenem-nonsusceptible Gram-negative bacilli (139 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 73 KPC-producing Enterobacterales) from 71 Brazilian hospitals (2013 to 2020). Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam MICs from the panel were compared with a broth microdilution (BMD) test as the reference method. Essential agreement (EA) and categorical agreement (CA) were assessed. For P. aeruginosa, antimicrobial susceptibility testing error rates were calculated using the error-rate bound method. Discrepancies were initially observed with 11 isolates; 4 resolved after retesting, 2 in favor of the NMR1 and 2 in favor of the BMD method. The ceftazidime-avibactam EA (overall and evaluable) was 100% for P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. The CA was 100% for Enterobacterales and 98.6% for P. aeruginosa. The ceftolozane-tazobactam EA was 98.6% and 100% (overall and evaluable, respectively), and the CA was 96.4% for P. aeruginosa. For ceftazidime/avibactam, no very major error (VME) was found, and the major error (ME) rate was 4.2% (2/48). For ceftolozane-tazobactam and P. aeruginosa, using the CLSI breakpoints, the minor error (mE) was 11.4%, and no VME or ME was found. While using EUCAST breakpoints, the VME was 11.4% with no ME. The mE becomes ME or VME in the absence of the intermediate category. All categorical errors were also within 1 log of MIC variation, and the adjusted error rate for CLSI/EUCAST was 0% (0/212). The NMR1 panel is an option to test ceftazidime-avibactam for KPC-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa. When a MIC of 4 mg/liter for ceftolozane-tazobactam is obtained using this method, an alert could be created, and the results could be confirmed by an alternative method.

Establishment of epidemiological cut-off values for cefoselis, a new fourth-generation cephalosporin, against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

OBJECTIVES

To establish the epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) for cefoselis against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

METHODS

We collected 2288 non-repetitive clinical isolates from five laboratories throughout four cities in China. The cefoselis MICs and inhibition zone diameters for all isolates were established using the broth microdilution method and the disc diffusion method following EUCAST guidelines. MIC ECOFFs were determined by visual estimation and ECOFFinder software. Zone diameter ECOFFs were set if a high correlation of MICs and inhibition zone diameters was found by Pearson correlation. Zone diameter ECOFFs were finally determined by the visual estimate method.

RESULTS

MICs of cefoselis were distributed from 0.008 to >256 mg/L for the four Enterobacterales species and from 0.25 to >256 mg/L for P. aeruginosa. MIC ECOFFs were 0.125 mg/L for E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis, 0.25 mg/L for E. cloacae and 32 mg/L for P. aeruginosa. A high correlation of MICs and zone diameters was observed for all Enterobacterales (|r| > 0.8, P < 0.001) and a relatively high correlation was found for P. aeruginosa (|r| = 0.71, P < 0.001). The zone diameter ECOFF was 24 mm for E. cloacae, E. coli and K. pneumoniae, 26 mm for P. mirabilis and 21 mm for P. aeruginosa.

CONCLUSIONS

We determined MIC and zone diameter ECOFFs for cefoselis against four Enterobacterales species and P. aeruginosa. The establishment of ECOFFs for cefoselis provides clinicians with helpful guidance to differentiate WT and non-WT pathogens.