Evaluation of the clinical performance of the cobas 4800 HPV test in patients referred for colposcopy

Prevalence and genotypic distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) among ever-married women in coastal regions of Bangladesh

BACKGROUND

Understanding the distribution of type specific human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes in screen-detected lesions is crucial to differentiate women who are at a higher risk of developing cervical cancer. This study aimed to find out high-risk HPV genotype distribution among women of the coastal districts of Bangladesh.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study conducted from January 2023 to December 2023 aimed to investigate the prevalence and distribution patterns of high-risk HPV genotypes among ever-married women aged 30-60 years residing in three coastal districts of Bangladesh. Sampling was purposive, with 300 participants per district. Exclusion criteria included prior cervical precancer or cancer treatment, hysterectomy, cervical amputation, and pregnancy. HPV DNA specimens were collected and tested using Cobas 4800. Positive cases underwent further genotype analysis with GenoFlowTM HPV Array Test Kit. Statistical analysis utilized SPSS version 25.0, employing Chi-square and Fisher's Exact tests.

RESULTS

Among 900 participants HR-HPV prevalence was 2.56%. HPV 16 was the most prevalent genotype (38.46%), followed by HPV 66 and HPV 68 (11.54% each). Single infections of HPV 16 predominated (39.13%), while for co-infections HPV 66 and HPV 68 were most common (13.04%). HR-HPV positivity increased with age, peaking at 5.5% in the 55-60 years' age group. Participants education level, occupation, income, and reproductive history showed no significant association with HPV positivity. District-wise prevalence varied insignificantly, with Jhalokathi exhibiting the highest (3.0%), followed by Cox's Bazar (2.7%), and Bagerhat (2.0%). HPV 16 was the predominant genotype across districts, with Cox's Bazar and Jhalokathi demonstrating greater genotype diversity than Bagerhat.

CONCLUSION

The study concludes that among ever-married women in the coastal districts of Bangladesh, there is a low prevalence of high-risk HPV. The predominant high-risk HPV genotypes identified were HPV 16, followed by HPV 66 and 68. These findings hold significant implications for policy makers, providing guidance for targeted screening strategies and vaccination programs.

Comparison of four different human papillomavirus genotyping methods in cervical samples: Addressing method-specific advantages and limitations

Since human papillomavirus (HPV) is recognized as the causative agent of cervical cancer and associated with anogenital non-cervical and oropharyngeal cancers, the characterization of the HPV types circulating in different geographic regions is an important tool in screening and prevention. In this context, this study compared four methodologies for HPV detection and genotyping: real-time PCR (Cobas® HPV test), nested PCR followed by conventional Sanger sequencing, reverse hybridization (High + Low PapillomaStrip® kit) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) at an Illumina HiSeq2500 platform. Cervical samples from patients followed at the Family Health Strategy from Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil, were collected and subjected to the real-time PCR. Of those, 114 were included in this study according to the results obtained with the real-time PCR, considered herein as the gold standard method. For the 110 samples tested by at least one methodology in addition to real-time PCR, NGS showed the lowest concordance rates of HPV and high-risk HPV identification compared to the other three methods (67-75 %). Real-time PCR and Sanger sequencing showed the highest rates of concordance (97-100 %). All methods differed in their sensitivity and specificity. HPV genotyping contributes to individual risk stratification, therapeutic decisions, epidemiological studies and vaccine development, supporting approaches in prevention, healthcare and management of HPV infection.

High sensitivity and specificity rates of cobas® HPV test as a primary screening test for cervical intraepithelial lesions in a real-world setting

Cervical carcinoma (CC) is the fourth most common malignancy among women. Screening with Papanicolau smear is linked to a reduction in CC incidence rates when screening programs have been developed. However, this technique has several limitations, including moderate sensitivity rates for detection of cervical preneoplastic HPV-related lesions. In this real-world study, we proposed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity rates of cobas® test, which amplifies target DNA fragments by polymerase chain reaction and hybridization of nucleic acids for the detection of 14 HR-HPV types in a single analysis) used as primary screening test for CC and preneoplastic lesions in women aged 25-65 years in a large University Hospital in Buenos Aires. A total of 1044 patients were included in the sample (median age: 46 years); sensitivity and specificity rates for the HR-HPV test used as primary screening test were 98.66% (95% confidence interval [95CI]: 97.67-99.3%) and 87.15% (95CI: 84.93-89.15%), respectively. The positive predictive value was 88.47% (95CI: 86.54%-90.42%) and the negative predictive value was 98.48% (95CI: 97.75%-99.23%). The cobas® HR-HPV testing was highly sensitive and specific for the detection of CC and preneoplastic lesions in real practice.

Incidence, persistence and clearance of cervical human papillomavirus among women in Guangdong, China 2007-2018: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies showed the incidence, persistence and clearance of cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) among women varies from regions. There is no study on dynamic changes of HPV infection among women in Guangdong.

METHODS

It is a retrospective cohort study that included gynecological outpatients aged ≥15 years and retested for HPV within 24 months in Guangdong Women and Children Hospital to estimate HPV incidence, persistence and clearance. Outcomes were estimated through the proportion of HPV incidence, persistence and clearance in HPV-negative or HPV-positive women. Moreover, we examined HPV incidence, persistence and clearance among women who retested in four calendar periods: 0-6, 6-12, 12-18, 18-24 months after the first test.

RESULTS

33,328 gynecological outpatients were included in our study. Incidence rates of any HPV, high-risk (HR) HPV and low-risk (LR) HPV were 10.58%, 8.68% and 4.83%. The most common incident HR HPV were HPV52 (2.69%), HPV16 (1.23%) and HPV58 (1.23%). Persistence rates of any HPV, HR HPV and LR HPV were 47.55%, 42.77% and 33.88%. HPV52 (42.33%), HPV58 (40.74%) and HPV68 (32.36%) were commonly found persistent types. And clearance rates of any HPV, HR HPV and LR HPV were 52.44%, 57.23% and 66.12%.The lowest clearance rates were observed for HPV52 (57.67%), HPV68 (67.64%) and HPV39 (68.56%). HPV incidence and persistence were higher among women aged 15-19 years and ≥55 years. HPV incidence and persistence were found higher among women who retested within 6 months than others in other periods.

CONCLUSIONS

HPV52, 58, 68, and 39 were the more likely to cause incident and persistent infection, and less likely to be cleared among women in Guangdong. HPV incidence and persistent infection were higher among women aged both younger and older women compared to middle aged women. HPV retesting period may impact the detection of HPV incidence, persistence and clearance.

Comparison of CerviHPV and Hybrid Capture 2 HPV tests for detection of high-risk HPV infection in cervical swab specimens

BACKGROUND

Persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection is the etiological cause of virtually all cervical cancer cases. HR-HPV screening achieved with earlier generations of HR-HPV tests has been instrumental in the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer worldwide. The first FDA-approved HR-HPV test, digene Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA Test (HC2), has been prominent in these efforts. Newer tests have since been developed to improve upon the capability of HC2 test.

METHODS

To evaluate the performance of a new multiplex real-time quantitative PCR assay for HR-HPV detection, CerviHPV HR-HPV Test (CerviHPV), 232 cervical swab specimens were collected and analyzed by HC2 and CerviHPV tests for comparison.

RESULTS

HC2 test detected 69 (29.7%) positive cases, whereas CerviHPV test reported 43 (18.5%) positive cases. The concordance rate between the two tests was 84.5% with a kappa value of 0.579. Additional analyses identified only HPV66 or low-risk HPV (LR-HPV) types in six HC2 positive discordant cases, suggesting these HC2 results to be false positive.

CONCLUSION

CerviHPV test has two advantages over HC2 test: It contains a cellular control to eliminate false negative results due to failed sample collection and processing, and it can simultaneously detect and genotype the two most carcinogenic HPV types, HPV16 and 18. In this comparison study, CerviHPV test also demonstrated higher analytical specificity for HR-HPV genotypes than HC2 test. Therefore, CerviHPV test has the potential to become a viable option for cervical cancer screening in the clinics.

Cervical human papillomavirus among 19 753 women attending gynecological department of a major comprehensive hospital in north Anhui China 2013-2016: Implication for cervical cancer screening and prevention

Our study aimed to assess the prevalent, incident, and persistent infection, and clearance of HPV among 19 753 individual women attending the gynecological department at a major comprehensive hospital. HPV 16, 52, and 58 ranked top three types with the highest prevalence and incidence. The prevalence of high-risk (HR) HPV peaked among women aged 15 to 19 years, then sharply decreased with age, stabilized among women aged 25 to 44 years, and then surged again among women aged 45 years and older. HR HPV infection were more likely to be prevalent (15.9% vs 1.3%, P < 0.001), incident (17.3 vs 2.0 per 1000 person-months, P < 0.001), and persistent (33.0% vs 24.2%, P = 0.033), and less likely to clear (88 vs 115 per 1000 person-months, P = 0.040) compared to low-risk HPV types. The majority of women detected with HR HPV types did not retest within 12 months. Clinical guidelines on HPV DNA testing are needed and education and counseling about HPV infection and its implications for women detected with HPV at clinical settings are warranted.

The Accuracy of p16/Ki-67 and HPV Test in the Detection of CIN2/3 in Women Diagnosed with ASC-US or LSIL

The objective of this study was to compare the accuracies of double staining for p16/Ki-67 and the molecular test for high-risk HPV (hr-HPV) to identify high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2/CIN3) in women with cervical cytology of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). Data were collected from 201 women who underwent cervical cytology screening in the Barretos Cancer Hospital and their results were categorized as ASC-US (n=96) or LSIL (n=105). All patients underwent colposcopy with or without cervical biopsy for diagnosis of CIN2/CIN3. The hr-HPV test (Cobas 4800 test) and immunocytochemistry were performed to detect biomarkers p16/Ki-67 (CINtec PLUS test). Two samples (1 ASC-US/1 LSIL) were excluded from the analysis due to inconclusive results of the histologic examination. There were 8 cases of CIN2/CIN3 among 95 women with ASC-US (8.4%), and 23 cases of CIN2/CIN3 among 104 women with LSIL (22.1%). In the group of women with ASC-US, the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing CIN2/CIN3 were 87.5% and 79.5% for the HPV test and 62.5% and 93.1% for p16/Ki-67. Among women with LSIL, the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of CIN2/CIN3 were 87% and 34.7% for the HPV test and 69.6% and 75.3% for immunocytochemistry. Superior performance was observed for p16/Ki-67 double staining, especially among women under 30 for whom the test had an area under the ROC curve of 0.762 (p<0.001). Both p16/Ki-67 double staining and the hr-HPV DNA test had similar performance in predicting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women with ASC-US. The best performance was observed in women aged >30 years. In younger women (≤30 years) with LSIL, p16/Ki-67 had greater accuracy in identifying precursor lesions. Among women >30 years diagnosed with LSIL, the two methods showed similar performance.

A cornucopia of screening and diagnostic techniques for human papillomavirus associated cervical carcinomas

Cervical carcinoma is one of the major consequences of human papillomavirus (HPV) infections. Although HPV infections of cervix do not always progress to cancer, 90% cases of cervical cancer have been found associated with high risk HPV (hrHPV) infection. Usually, HPV infection is asymptomatic; however, this asymptomatic infection can cause abnormal changes in cervix ultimately leading to cancer development. These changes can be detected by the application of screening tests at regular time intervals. For this purpose, morphological, cytological, and DNA based techniques are available. Nevertheless, abnormal screening tests have only the predictive value for precancerous lesions and thus require further evaluation which is usually done by using diagnostic techniques. So far, colposcopy and histological examination alone were considered as the gold standards for cervical cancer diagnosis. Currently, some tests based on expression level of host cell biomarkers are also being used along with histology for diagnostic purpose. Albeit, these tests have significant specificity and sensitivity values but they are unable to suggest a particular viral genotype involved in infection. Diagnostic methods such as PCR, HPV genotyping assays, microarray, and mRNA based assays are useful to predict the genotypes as well as the quantity of viral load in a host cell. Similarly, these diagnostic procedures have high specificity and sensitivity ranges. However, only few of them are practiced commonly, as approval of these tests as routine diagnostic tests requires clinical validation and cost effectiveness.

Human papillomavirus detection and genotyping, by HC2, full-spectrum HPV and molecular beacon real-time HPV assay in an Irish colposcopy clinic

Cervical screening programmes are moving towards HPV testing as part of the screening process and as a triage for colposcopy. Three HPV detection methods were evaluated using cervical cytology specimens from colposcopy patients. PreservCyt™ liquid based cytology specimens from 241 women attending colposcopy clinics with greater than 2 persistently abnormal smears were recruited through the Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin. HPV DNA was detected by Hybrid Capture (HC2) for 13 high-risk HPV types, Full-Spectrum HPV (FS-HPV) for 49 high and low-risk types and Molecular Beacon Real-Time HPV assay (MBRT-HPV) for 16 high and low-risk types. HPV genotyping was performed using Linear Array HPV Assay (LA-HPV). HPV was detected in 83.3% (195/234), 91.9% (217/236) and 80.1% (169/211) of cytology specimens by HC2, FS-HPV and MBRT-HPV, HPV DNA detection assays. The sensitivity of the assays for the detection of high-risk HPV in cytology specimens that had a Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2+ result by histology were, 98%, 97% and 94% for HC2, FS-HPV and MBRT-HPV assays with positive predictive values of 94.1%, 94.1% and 97.3%. The most common HPV genotypes were HPV 16, 31, 33, 58, 42, 61 and 53, and the most common high-risk HPV genotypes were HPV 16, 31, 33, 58, 18, 45, 59, 51, 56 and 39, with detection of multiple infections in 57.7% of all cases. FS-HPV and MBRT-HPV are highly sensitive and have a similarly high PPV as the HC2 assay for detection of HPV in patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2+ disease. HPV genotyping of women with persistent abnormalities is warranted prior to the introduction of HPV DNA testing in a colposcopy setting.