Diagnostic Accuracy of Cerebrospinal Fluid Procalcitonin in Bacterial Meningitis Patients with Empiric Antibiotic Pretreatment

Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in adults with suspected central nervous system infections

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for the diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) infections and specifically bacterial meningitis.

METHODS

We analyzed 12 cytokines, chemokines, and acute phase reactants in CSF and plasma of 738 patients with suspected neurological infection included in a multicenter prospective cohort. We determined diagnostic accuracy for predicting any CNS infection and bacterial meningitis.

RESULTS

We included 738 episodes between 2017 and 2022, split into a derivation (n = 450) and validation cohort (n = 288). Of these patients, 224 (30%) were diagnosed with CNS infection, of which 81 (11%) with bacterial meningitis, 107 (14%) with viral meningitis or encephalitis, and 35 patients (5%) with another CNS infection. Diagnostic accuracy of CRP, IL-6, and Il-1β in CSF was high, especially for diagnosing bacterial meningitis. Combining these biomarkers in a multivariable model increased accuracy and provided excellent discrimination between bacterial meningitis and all other disorders (AUC = 0.99), outperforming all individual biomarkers as well as CSF leukocytes (AUC = 0.97). When applied to the population of patients with a CSF leukocyte count of 5-1000 cells/mm3, accuracy of the model also provided a high diagnostic accuracy (AUC model = 0.97 vs. AUC CSF leukocytes = 0.80) with 100% sensitivity and 92% specificity. These results remained robust in a temporal validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Inflammatory biomarkers in CSF are able to differentiate CNS infections and especially bacterial meningitis from other disorders. When these biomarkers are combined, their diagnostic accuracy exceeds that of CSF leukocytes alone and as such these markers have added value to current clinical practice.

Distinguishing community-acquired bacterial and viral meningitis: Microbes and biomarkers

Diagnostic tools to differentiate between community-acquired bacterial and viral meningitis are essential to target the potentially lifesaving antibiotic treatment to those at greatest risk and concurrently spare patients with viral meningitis from the disadvantages of antibiotics. In addition, excluding bacterial meningitis and thus decreasing antibiotic consumption would be important to help reduce antimicrobial resistance and healthcare expenses. The available diagnostic laboratory tests for differentiating bacterial and viral meningitis can be divided microbiological pathogen-focussed methods and biomarkers of the host response. Bacterial culture-independent microbiological methods, such as highly multiplexed nucleic acid amplification tests, are rapidly making their way into the clinical practice. At the same time, more conventional host protein biomarkers, such as procalcitonin and C-reactive protein, are supplemented by newer proteomic and transcriptomic signatures. This review aims to summarise the current state and the recent advances in diagnostic methods to differentiate bacterial from viral meningitis.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Cerebrospinal Fluid Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Panel Testing in Patients With Suspected Central Nervous System Infections: A Multi-Center Study in the United Arab Emirates

Background Delays in diagnosis and treatment of central nervous system (CNS) infections can lead to significant morbidity and mortality among children and adults. Prior antibiotic treatment is a major hurdle to accurate diagnosis due to falsely negative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures in partially treated patients. Increasingly, molecular diagnostic methods using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) testing on CSF samples are being utilized in clinical practice for timely and accurate diagnosis. However, there is no data regarding the diagnostic accuracy or clinical impact of CSF mPCR testing in the Middle East region. We sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of an automated mPCR CSF panel with routine CSF culture, the current gold standard, in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).  Methods This single-gated, multi-center, diagnostic accuracy study included patients from birth onwards who were admitted to any of the three participating hospitals with an initial diagnosis of meningitis or encephalitis, between January 2017 and March 2021, and had CSF samples collected for mPCR and culture. Sociodemographic, clinical, and molecular data were collected for all. Results A total of 353 CSF samples were collected from patients from 0-90 years old hospitalized for suspected CNS infection. Children constituted 51% of the study population, and males were slightly over-represented (55.2%). Pathogens were detected by mPCR in 78 (22%) CSF samples, of which 19 (24%) were bacteria and 59 (76%) were viruses. No fungal pathogens were detected. Enteroviruses were the most prevalent CNS pathogen among our cohort (40%), followed by herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) (12.5%). Children constituted 69% of positive samples for enterovirus, while HSV-2 was exclusively detected among adults. Using CSF culture as the diagnostic gold standard, the mPCR panel demonstrated high specificity (100%) and sensitivity (96.3%) in diagnosing CNS infection among all age groups. mPCR testing demonstrated a high overall percentage of agreement (OPA) with CSF culture (98.9%). Patients with bacterial meningitis had a significantly longer hospitalization (p=0.004) and duration of antibiotic therapy (p=0.001) compared to those with viral meningitis. Three CSF samples were negative on mPCR testing but positive on culture. These pathogens included: methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus(MSSA), Bacillus cereus, and Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (MTB). In addition, 13 patients had negative CSF cultures but tested positive on CSF mPCR. These pathogens included Streptococcus pneumoniae (seven patients), Haemophilus influenzae (three patients), Streptococcus agalactiae (two patients), and Escherichia coli (one patient). All discordant results were confirmed by reviewing the patient's clinical presentation, CSF analysis, clinical course, and final diagnosis. Conclusion CSF mPCR panel is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of CNS infections among all age groups in the UAE. Routine use of CSF mPCR panels can decrease healthcare costs by reducing the length of stay and can also aid antibiotic stewardship efforts by reducing antibiotic overuse in patients with viral CSF infections. CSF culture and mPCR complement each other by identifying CNS pathogens in patients with prior antibiotic exposure who would otherwise be missed if relying on CSF culture alone. However, concomitant CSF culture samples should be sent to avoid missing unusual CNS pathogens.

Extra-pulmonary applications of procalcitonin: an updated literature review

INTRODUCTION

: Procalcitonin (PCT) is a biomarker with established performance in the differentiation between bacterial and viral infections, predominantly in pulmonary infections, as well as the diagnosis and prognosis of bacterial sepsis. However, the role of PCT in extra-pulmonary infections is not well described.

AREAS COVERED

: We reviewed the role of PCT in commonly experienced extra-pulmonary infections including meningitis, diabetic foot infection, prosthetic joint infection, osteomyelitis, and skin and soft tissue infection. PubMed and Medline online libraries were searched, from 2013 till 2022, for relevant articles.

EXPERT OPINION

: For meningitis, PCT could distinguish bacterial from viral meningitis. PCT distinguished septic arthritis from different types of arthritis but had variable performance in discriminating septic arthritis from crystal arthropathy. For periprosthetic joint infections, results were inconclusive. PCT had a potential role in diagnosis of more complex infections such as osteomyelitis and diabetic foot infections, but further studies are needed for a definitive cutoff. In skin and soft tissue infections, PCT performance was more variable requiring further investigation to define cutoff for the discrimination of cellulitis from necrotizing fasciitis. We find that PCT performed best for meningitis and helps in the reduction of unnecessary antibiotic treatment, but has variable outcomes with other extra-pulmonary infections.

Quantitative proteomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid reveals CD163, A2M and full-length APP as potential diagnostic biomarkers of paediatric bacterial meningitis

Background

Bacterial meningitis (BM) is a life-threatening infectious disease of the central nervous system in infants and children. To date, no diagnostic methods for the early and precise diagnosis of paediatric BM have been developed.

Methods

A label-free cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) quantitative proteomic analysis of 8 patients with confirmed or suspected BM, 9 patients with confirmed or suspected viral meningitis (VM) and 6 non-CNS-infected hospital patients was performed via high-resolution LC–MS/MS.

Results

Our CSF proteomic analysis allowed the identification of critical differences between the BM and non-BM groups. Compared to the proteomes of the non-BM groups, the proteome of the paediatric BM group was characterized by upregulation of complement and coagulation cascades, regulation of IGF transport, uptake by IGF-binding proteins and acute inflammatory response, downregulation of developmental growth, and metabolism of carbohydrates. Moreover, the levels of CD163, A2M and full-length APP in CSF showed excellent diagnostic performance for paediatric BM, with AUC values of 0.911 (95% CI: 0.839–0.984), 0.908 (95% CI: 0.816–1.000) and 0.944 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.000), respectively. Among them, A2M and full-length APP are reported here for the first time as potential diagnostic biomarkers of BM. The findings imply that peptidase regulator activity plays an important role in BM and provide potential novel targets for precision medicine in paediatric BM.

Conclusions

CD163, A2M and full-length APP are validated as potential diagnostic biomarkers of paediatric BM.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12953-022-00191-5.

Accuracy of heparin-binding protein for the diagnosis of nosocomial meningitis and ventriculitis

Background

The sensitive and accurate diagnosis of nosocomial meningitis and ventriculitis is still a critical problem. This study was designed to explore the diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid heparin-binding protein (HBP) in nosocomial meningitis and ventriculitis in comparison with procalcitonin and lactate.

Methods

In this observational study, 323 suspected patients were enrolled, of which 42 participants were excluded because they could not be accurately grouped, 131 subjects who were eventually diagnosed with nosocomial meningitis or ventriculitis and 150 patients in whom infection was ultimately ruled out were included in the final analysis. The main results are expressed as medians (interquartile ranges). The Chi-squared test was used to compare the baseline characteristics. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used for group and subgroup analyses. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to describe the diagnostic accuracy of the biomarkers. Spearman's partial correlation was used to analyze associations between the biomarkers. Statistical significance was set when p value < 0.05.

Results

HBP achieved the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, which was 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.98—1.00) compared with 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.96—0.99) for lactate and 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.62—0.75) for procalcitonin. With a cutoff level at 23 ng/mL, HBP achieved a sensitivity of 97%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 93% and a negative predictive value of 98%. The levels of HBP presented no significant discrepancy between patients who received previous empiric anti-infective therapy and those who did not (p > 0.05). Higher concentrations of HBP were present in patients with positive microbiological findings (p < 0.05). Levels of HBP positively correlated with polymorphonuclear cell count (Spearman's rho = 0.68, p < 0.01), white blood cell count (Spearman's rho = 0.57, p < 0.01) and lactate (Spearman's rho = 0.34, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Cerebrospinal fluid heparin-binding protein is a reliable auxiliary diagnostic marker that is preferable over lactate and procalcitonin in identifying nosocomial meningitis and ventriculitis, and it also contributes to solving the diagnostic difficulties caused by empiric antibiotherapy.

Post-neurosurgical meningitis; gram negative bacilli vs. gram positive cocci

Background

Post-neurosurgical meningitis is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity. In this study we aimed to compare the differences of clinical, laboratory features and outcomes between the post-neurosurgical meningitis caused by gram-negative bacilli (GNB) and gram-positive cocci (GPC).

Methods

Cases of post-neurosurgical meningitis (with positive CSF culture) were included. After classifying patients as GNB and GPC groups, clinical and paraclinical data were compared.

Results

Out of 2667 neurosurgical patients, CSF culture was positive in 45 patients. 25 (54.3%) were GNB, 19 (41.3%) GPC. The most common microorganisms were Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=14, 31.1%), Coagulase negative staphylococcus (n=8, 17.8%), Staphylococcus aureus (n=6, 13.3%), Acinetobacter baumannii (n=4, 8.9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=2, 4.4%), and Escherichia coli (n=2, 4.4%). There were no correlation between CSF Leakage, Surgical site appearance, presence of drain, Age and GCS between two groups (P=0.11, P=0.28, P=0.06, P=0.86, P=0.11 respectively). The only different laboratory indexes were ESR (86.8 mm/h vs. 59.5 mm/h, P=0.01) and PCT (13.1 ng/ml vs. 0.8 ng/ml, P=0.02) which were higher in GNB cases. 20% (n=5) of patients with GNB meningitis received preoperative corticosteroid, while none of GPC cases received (P=0.03). The median length of hospitalization for GNB and GPC cases was 56 and 44.4 days respectively (P=0.3).

Conclusion

The GNB antibiotic coverage should be designed more carefully in post-neurosurgical meningitis especially in patients with recent corticosteroid therapy and elevated ESR and procalcitonin.

Predicting Bacterial Versus Viral Infection, or None of the Above: Current and Future Prospects of Biomarkers

Sepsis and pneumonia cause significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite improvements in diagnostic methodologies for organism identification, the early recognition and further risk stratification of these infections can be challenging. Although traditional clinical scoring systems are beneficial for the management of sepsis and pneumonia, biomarkers supporting the diagnosis and management of these infectious diseases are needed. Many biomarkers have been identified and there is no lack of studies and meta-analyses assessing the utility of biomarkers. Focusing primarily on sepsis and pneumonia, this article discusses the most commonly used biomarkers for which clinical laboratory testing methods are available.

Value of lipocalin 2 as a potential biomarker for bacterial meningitis

OBJECTIVES

Central nervous system (CNS) infections are common causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. We aimed to discover protein biomarkers that could rapidly and accurately identify the likely cause of the infections, essential for clinical management and improving outcome.

METHODS

We applied liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry on 45 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from a cohort of adults with and without CNS infections to discover potential diagnostic biomarkers. We then validated the diagnostic performance of a selected biomarker candidate in an independent cohort of 364 consecutively treated adults with CNS infections admitted to a referral hospital in Vietnam.

RESULTS

In the discovery cohort, we identified lipocalin 2 (LCN2) as a potential biomarker of bacterial meningitis (BM) other than tuberculous meningitis. The analysis of the validation cohort showed that LCN2 could discriminate BM from other CNS infections (including tuberculous meningitis, cryptococcal meningitis and virus/antibody-mediated encephalitis), with sensitivity of 0.88 (95% confident interval (CI), 0.77-0.94), specificity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.94) and diagnostic odds ratio of 73.8 (95% CI, 31.8-171.4). LCN2 outperformed other CSF markers (leukocytes, glucose, protein and lactate) commonly used in routine care worldwide. The combination of LCN2, CSF leukocytes, glucose, protein and lactate resulted in the highest diagnostic performance for BM (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99). Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD020510.

CONCLUSIONS

LCN2 is a sensitive and specific biomarker for discriminating BM from a broad spectrum of other CNS infections. A prospective study is needed to assess the diagnostic utility of LCN2 in the diagnosis and management of CNS infections.

Technological advances and changing indications for lumbar puncture in neurological disorders

Technological advances have changed the indications for and the way in which lumbar puncture is done. Suspected CNS infection remains the most common indication for lumbar puncture, but new molecular techniques have broadened CSF analysis indications, such as the determination of neuronal autoantibodies in autoimmune encephalitis. New screening techniques have increased sensitvity for pathogen detection and can be used to identify pathogens that were previously unknown to cause CNS infections. Evidence suggests that potential treatments for neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, will rely on early detection of the disease with the use of CSF biomarkers. In addition to being used as a diagnostic tool, lumbar puncture can also be used to administer intrathecal treatments as shown by studies of antisense oligonucleotides in patients with spinal muscular atrophy. Lumbar puncture is generally a safe procedure but complications can occur, ranging from minor (eg, back pain) to potentially devastating (eg, cerebral herniation). Evidence that an atraumatic needle tip design reduces complications of lumbar puncture is compelling, and reinforces the need to change clinical practice.

Diagnostic Value of Procalcitonin for Bacterial Meningitis in Children: A Comparison Analysis Between Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid Procalcitonin Levels

The aim of this study was to analyze and compare procalcitonin (PCT) levels in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as tools for detecting bacterial meningitis (BM) in children. Serum and CSF PCT levels as well as albumin index (AI = CSF albumin/serum albumin × 1000) were measured from 29 BM, 25 viral meningitis (VM), and 47 non-meningitis patients. Differences between groups only for CSF PCT were significant. A stronger positive correlation between CSF PCT level and AI was observed in the BM patients ( R = 0.68, P < .001). As a predictor of BM, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for CSF PCT was greater than that of serum PCT (0.76 vs 0.67, P < .05) and a cutoff of ⩾0.085 ng/mL achieved 55.17% sensitivity and 95.83% specificity. High levels of CSF PCT may indicate loss of integrity of the blood-brain barrier; only CSF PCT has a diagnostic value for BM in children suspected meningitis.

The Role of Procalcitonin in the Diagnosis of Meningitis: A Literature Review

OBJECTIVE

To review the current published literature on the use of procalcitonin as a diagnostic and prognostic marker in adult patients with meningitis.

METHODS

We conducted a PubMed search to identify all relevant publications regarding the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum procalcitonin in patients with a known or suspected central nervous system infection. We also reviewed the bibliographies of all identified manuscripts in an attempt to identify additional relevant references.

RESULTS

A significant body of evidence suggests that serum procalcitonin has a promising role and can be a useful biomarker in the assessment of patients with meningitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our literature review suggests that data on the role of Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) procalcitonin are limited, whereas serum procalcitonin (S⁻PCT) is probably a useful tool in the evaluation of patients with a known or suspected central nervous system infection and can help distinguish between bacterial and viral meningitis.